Javon Bullard NFL Draft Prospect Profile and Scouting Report

Georgia Safety Javon Bullard - 2024 NFL Draft Scouting Report

Name: Javon Bullard

School: Georgia

Year: Junior

Position: Defensive Back

Measurables: 5’10 ⅖ ”, 198 lbs. (Combine Measurements)

Combine: ARM: 30.75”. HAND: 9”. VERTICAL: 33”. BENCH: 16 Reps. 40-YD DASH: 4.47. 10-YD SPLIT: 1.51. SHUTTLE: 3.97. 3-CONE: 7.00.

Stats:

Courtesy of Sports-Reference.com

 

General Info:

Born and raised in Georgia, Bullard attended Baldwin High School, where he played wide receiver, running back and cornerback, as well as safety.

He was a consensus three-star prospect coming out of high school, opting to play for his hometown team in Georgia over offers from Tennessee and Auburn.

Bullard saw playing time right away as a freshman, appearing in 14 games, splitting time between free safety, strong safety, and slot cornerback. He then started 11 games as a sophomore, playing mostly in the slot.

In 2022, Bullard logged 39 tackles, four sacks, two interceptions and five pass break ups.

The Bulldogs won the National Championship in each of his first two years, with Bullard being named the Defensive MVP of the 2022 Championship game.

After switching back to primarily a safety role in 2023, Bullard had 45 tackles, two interceptions and 5 pass break ups. He was named second-team All-SEC after his final campaign with Georgia.

In September of 2022, Bullard was arrested and charged with DUI. He will be 21 years old on draft day.

 

Positional Skills:

Strengths

From an athletic standpoint, Bullard has the tools to succeed in the NFL. He achieved an 8.25 Relative Athletic Score (RAS) on a 0-10 scale compared to his positional peers.

His freaky 3.97 3-cone ranks in the 98th percentile for safeties since 1987, and his 1.51 10-yard split ranks in the 96th percentile. He was also one of the speed leaders at the Senior Bowl, clocked at 20.71 mph.

The testing translates to the tape. Bullard is a fluid mover and an explosive athlete who can burst downhill, making him a dangerous blitzer.

In coverage, Bullard can take one on one man assignments and has all the movement ability he needs to stay in phase with receivers. During his mostly-slot season in 2022, he covered Florida’s Ricky Pearsall impressively. Bullard has no problem being physical with receivers on their routes.

When in zone coverage as a safety, Bullard has a good understanding of how to shade over different routes to dissuade the quarterback from going there. He will take away the deeper route, then break on the checkdown to limit the gain.

On the run defense side, Bullard defies his size and is a really solid contributor. Down in the box, he can set the edge, find the ball through trash and make the stop. Bullard’s tackling technique is really sound, reflected in the fact his missed tackle percentage in college was under 10%.

He gives good effort to get to the ball and arrives ready to hit. Bullard hustles down from the deep safety spot and fights to get off wide receiver blocks in order to get involved where necessary.

Bullard versatility is a real asset, as he projects to be able to play free safety and slot corner at the next level. There is plenty of evidence of success at both positions on his resume. Bullard can be asked to spy quarterbacks, and is a communicator on defense.

Weaknesses

The chief concern over Bullard will be his size. As a free safety, he has a ‘poor’ RAS score, ranking in the 22nd percentile for height and the 47th percentile for weight. However, if he is viewed as a cornerback, his size score is ‘good’.

If he is going to be asked to cover tight ends or bigger receivers regularly, this lack of size could be an issue. There are instances of tight ends knocking him around on routes, and there is a possibility he struggles to tackle as well in the NFL as he did in college at his size.

In coverage, his willingness to be physical can certainly border into ‘grabby’ territory at times, making him a potential risk to give up interference or holding penalties, although he only had five penalties in college.

When lined up at safety, he can make the wrong decision on which of his corners need help, and at times he could do a better job of closing the ‘turkey hole’, AKA the gap between the corner and the safety on the sideline, when receivers find their way there.

 

Fit with the Packers:

Overall, Bullard has all the movement skills and coverage ability required, and more than holds up his end of the bargain in run defense. He may never be special, but has a very well rounded game and his versatility adds real value.

Whether viewed as a corner or a safety, Bullard satisfies Green Bay’s general athletic preferences and could fill the Brian Branch-shaped hole in Packers fans’ hearts as a more athletic version of the playmaking DB many wanted a year ago.

The Bulldog could see significant playing time as a rookie alongside Xavier McKinney at safety, and eventually take over the starting slot role from Keisean Nixon.

Bullard is ranked 58th on the consensus big board, and the second round may be fitting, but do not be surprised if he ends up as Green Bay’s first pick in the draft, either at 25 overall or after a trade back.

Just three years ago, the Packers drafted Eric Stokes, a defensive back from Georgia ranked 56th on the consensus board, in the first round. Providing Green Bay is satisfied that any off-field issues are well behind him, Bullard is a sneaky first-round candidate hiding in plain sight.

 

VIDEO: 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
5 points
 

Comments (25)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 23, 2024 at 03:45 pm

Bullard and Bishop are 1 and 1A for me. In terms of an NFl comparable - Bullard is an extremely similar athlete to Budda Baker of the Arizona Cardinals. While stylistically he has been compared to Nick Collins - who needs little or no introduction to Packers fans. Especially as Collins was known as being fantastic in covering the middle of the field - while also a marvellous tackler who always was around the ball. Should Bullard approximate anywhere close to Baker and/Collins - the Packers will have a fine Safety to pair with McKinney for years to come.

As for his off-field issues - it was for underage drinking and a D.U.I. Apparently since then there hasn't been a single incident with Bullard.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
LLCHESTY's picture

April 23, 2024 at 05:11 pm

I don't get the Collins comparison, he was 10 lbs heavier 19 years ago. Baker makes more sense but my guess is they want a bigger guy at the other safety spot.

Some people think the other Georgia safety, Tykee Smith, will be a better pro. He played mostly at nickel for them but his job description seems to fit SS too. From PFF:

"Smith was a three-star recruit out of high school but very quickly outplayed that rating. He is a bigger slot player, which comes with useful extra power. He played the STAR position, a hybrid between a slot defender and linebacker, in Georgia’s system. In that role, he showcased his strength of taking on tight ends and offensive tackles better than most defensive backs."

If Hafley wants a on the line SS Tykee Smith fits better than Bullard. If they want an interchangeable guy with McKinney than Bullard makes sense.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 23, 2024 at 06:18 pm

The 2 most versatile Safetys in this draft are:

1. Cooper DeJean
2. Javon Bullard

No one else is in this tier. That being so, either DeJean or Bullard are probably the best partner for McKinney and fit for the Hafley scheme.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
LLCHESTY's picture

April 23, 2024 at 06:24 pm

How do know DeJean is a good deep safety? He's never played there.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 23, 2024 at 06:46 pm

His ability to adapt to various defensive roles, overall athleticism and high football I.Q. suggests that he can.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 23, 2024 at 07:50 pm

CBs are more valuable than Safeties. That's why they get drafted higher and paid more. So if a guy can play CB, you play him at CB, not safety.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 23, 2024 at 09:55 pm

So why do guards get more than centers? A lot more.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 24, 2024 at 05:58 pm

I don't know. Do you? I might offer the theory that you only need one center, and you need two guards So you only need to draft a center once every four years or so, but you need to draft guards twice as often. At that point, supply and demand start taking effect. The demand for centers isn't as great as the supply, which depresses the cost of their services.

But that's just a theory. CBs being more valuable than safeties isn't just a theory, it's football Bible. Defense in the NFL is pass defense, since that's how most yards are gained and most points are scored. And pass defense starts with keeping people covered long enough for the pass rush to reach home. When that happens, you get sacks and hurried throws. But if you can't cover anybody, the QB will simply throw it to an open guy before the rush can get to him.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 24, 2024 at 04:59 am

If he's an average CB but a great safety, he's more valuable as a safety. That might be the case with DeJean. I'd love to know what Hafley and Gutekunst think of him.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Bitternotsour's picture

April 24, 2024 at 06:10 pm

you'll know tomorrow night

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 23, 2024 at 09:41 pm

Smith is still recovering from a knee injury ,but was the better cover CB for West Virginia early in his collegiate career. See where he lands? Could be a steal if his physicals are sound. Malik Starks is the primo 1st team, All-American from the Bulldogs secondary crew, but you have to wait until next draft to see his name called.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 24, 2024 at 12:53 pm

I have not seen Hafley talk about wanting the hybrid SS/LB role, but that doesn't mean he doesn't want it.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 23, 2024 at 05:23 pm

"There are instances of tight ends knocking him around on routes, and there is a possibility he struggles to tackle as well in the NFL as he did in college at his size." Per this article, Bullard is not a marvelous tackler. He is also small for a Safety. Unless there are multiple legal problems like TVondre Sweat, I would not be concerned with one DUI. It is a serious offense, but most people who drink, including me, could easily have one of these on their record.

Nubin, Hicks, Bishop, and Kinchen are above this guy for me.

+ REPLY
0 points
3
3
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 23, 2024 at 06:38 pm

Until proven otherwise - all Safetys may potentially struggle to tackle at the Nfl level. Still Bullard had consistently demonstrated aggressiveness and competitiveness - particularly in run defense - while unafraid to confront blocks and challenge ball carriers.

As to his size - Budda Baker has been measured at 5'10" and 195 lbs - with All-Rookie, All-Pro and Pro Bowl honors. At the Combine - Bullard was measured at 5'10.5" and 198 lbs. Meanwhile McKinney is 6' and 201lbs. So just a small measure larger than Bullard.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 23, 2024 at 07:44 pm

But we're talking about a guy to play SS while McKinney is in single high, not his clone. Adrian Amos was 218 lbs, I think of you're going to put a safety on the LOS you want a minimum 205 lbs. We'll see what happens.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 23, 2024 at 10:16 pm

McKInney can play box, ss, fs and robber - as can Bullard. Gutekunst has stated that he wants a Safety who is versatile. Not just restricted to a certain area of the field.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2024 at 04:03 pm

I have Bullard at #58.
I Have Bullock near him.
So the problem seems to be size.
Not speed. I like both. But Nubin more.
But how do you write them in @58.?
(If Gute doesn't bring them in for a visit.)
It seems like #58 is trade Bait.

Obviously Gute is doing his due Diligence.
With the Amos clones instead.
And when I see where they might go.
I Doubt Bullard will be in GB.

+ REPLY
-1 points
1
2
jannes bjornson's picture

April 23, 2024 at 09:26 pm

With a 4-3 set up, a LB will crash to the LOS to confront the RB. Bullard profiles as a slot CB/S, but does not have the 4.3 Savage speed which is meaningless if the guy is afraid to tackle. Nubin a 4.6 guy with less than stellar explosion and vertical lift, but sound instincts. Will he be fast enough to run with the WRs working the crosses?
The guy they want down low is DeJean, followed by Mustapha, 205 lbs with 4.4 time and 41"-0 elevation with the desire to crash hard on the RBs. The other guys will be Hicks and Bishop if they want somebody with a heavier frame.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
splitpea1's picture

April 23, 2024 at 04:05 pm

Not in the first round. Most boards have him ranked between the middle and end of the second.

Since it's as good of an opportunity as any, I'll lobby for the Packers taking Cole Bishop somewhere along the line, even if it's a little bit of a reach. He has the big athletic numbers that Gute likes, so it could be a realistic possibility. We're badly in need of an enforcer in the box as well as someone who can cover tight ends (a problem for years). He would pair nicely with McKinney.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

April 23, 2024 at 04:12 pm

The only safety I want before pick 88 is Cooper DeJean.
At 88, I want whoever safety Hafley thinks is best for his system: Hicks, Bishop, Bullock, Bullard, or anyone they like better. I really don't know what qualities Hafely "needs."

I'd be fine with a second safety at 91 as well (assuming they don't get DeJean at 25).

I'm hoping 41 and 58 are both used on LBs, unless the board vehemently says "NO."
Two offensive linemen at 25 and 125, plus two LBs at 41 and 58, and two safeties at 88 and 91, would make our "three areas of concern" go away.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 24, 2024 at 01:01 pm

We need 0 CBs?

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Turophile's picture

April 23, 2024 at 04:36 pm

If you are not counting DeJean as a Safety he is probably safety no.1 now, after Nubin and Kinchens disappointed in athletic testing.

I'd be good with Hicks, Bishop, Bullard. I'd even take Nubin as a later pick (round 3). I like Bullock too, he has the athleticism you want, but he has to tackle better.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
golfpacker1's picture

April 23, 2024 at 05:32 pm

No Safties will be taken in round 1. Bullard might not go until round 3. In spite of the combine and pro day performances of Kinchen and Nubin, they are still both above Bullard. Their tape doesn't lie, and Kinchen had a better pro day. Nubin was still recovering from end of season surgery. Either could start in Green Bay next year.

That said almost every draft service have said Hicks and Bishop are perfect for the Packers need at Safety. One of those 2 and add Dominque Hampton-Washington later in the draft plus a decent veteran and the Safety Room is a full blown strength in 2024.

+ REPLY
4 points
5
1
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 24, 2024 at 12:15 pm

Assuming no Ss, LBs, RBs, WRs and QBs in the first round.

I do acknowledge that Hicks and Bishop are often mocked to the Packers. However I defer to Gutekunsts description of what he is looking for in a S - rather than the draft services - with Bullard emerging as the most ideal choice for the Packers. Just for the record - my top S choices are:
1. Cooper DeJean
2. Javon Bullard
3. Cole Bishop
4. Dadrion Taylor-Demerson
5. Jaden Hicks

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 24, 2024 at 06:08 pm

Golf, I agree that there aren't any first round safeties. There is a strong possibility that a quality CB would be available at #25. I strongly, 98% think that we'll sign a vet safety, like Micah Hyde or Rudy Ford or somebody, and that we'll draft a safety on Day 2.

I like Bishop. Then again, I'm a fan of Alien.

Today's Simulation, PFN. No trades.

#25 McKinstry
#41 Edgerrin Cooper
#58 Kiran Amegadjie
#88 Cole Bishop
#91 Sedric Van Pran

Two offensive linemen, three defenders.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.