Packers Select DT Chris McClellan in 2026 NFL Draft - Round 3, Pick 77
By Carter Semb
Chris McClellan, DT, Missouri
MEASURABLES/PRO DAY:
Height: 6'3 ¾”
Weight: 313 lbs
Arms: 34”
40 Time: 5.05 seconds
0-yd Split: 1.80 seconds
Vertical: 29 1/2”
Broad: 108”
VIDEO:
NFL SCOUTING REPORT:
Here's what Lance Zierlein of NFL.com had to say about McClellan: "Two-year starter who is solidly proportional with adequate length. McClellan is not a natural knee-bender, which limits his anchor, and he allows blockers too far into his frame too often. He has flashes where he can dominate a rep, but he will need to improve his take-on technique and hand usage to be more consistent. His first step is average and his pass rush isn’t overly explosive, but McClellan can pry open edges with strong hands. He plows through to collapse pockets once his foot is in the door and projects as a backup nose tackle in an even-front defense."
Here's what Dane Brugler of The Athletic had to say about McClellan: "McClellan looks like an NFL player, with his big frame and bear-claw hands. He can be a tough guy for centers to defend when he times up the snap and uses his full extension or arm-over moves to create interior pressure. However, he can get stuck on blocks and needs to be more efficient with his hands to deconstruct and shed. Against the run, he can hold the point and respond well to double teams. McClellan isn’t a consistent disruptor, but he checks boxes with his physical characteristics and developing recognition skills. He projects as a rotational lineman on the interior who can give teams quality snaps as a zero-/one-technique."
FIT WITH THE PACKERS:
The Packers needed a nose tackle, and they got one. McClellan isn't a disruptor, but he can line up as a zero-, one-, or three-technique, and he's has the potential to be a rotational defensive linemen for a long time. Here's what the Cheesehead TV Draft Guide had to say about McClellan's fit with the Packers: "McClellan possesses an excellent frame and 34-inch reach, allowing him to establish a solid anchor and generate leverage to disrupt running lanes. His strength is most effective when he wins the initial engagement. However, his game remains largely unrefined; he often struggles with his get-off and can be neutralized by more technical interior blockers. His overall impact fluctuates due to inconsistent snap quickness and a lack of polished counters. Despite these technical hurdles, his natural power and frame provide the foundation for a productive role as an NFL rotational defender."
CAREER NOTES:
| Year | School | Games | Tkls | TFL | Sack | FF | PD |
| 2022 | Florida | 13 | 23 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | Florida | 12 | 23 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | Missouri | 13 | 39 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 2 |
| 2025 | Missouri | 13 | 48 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
Chris McClellan was a four-star recruit out of high school and the No. 2 recruit in Oklahoma. He had major offers from schools like Michigan, Ohio State, Oregon, USC, Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, LSU, Oklahoma, Texas, and Texas A&M. McClellan chose Florida, which is where he spent his first two seasons. After his sophomore season, McClellan entered the transfer portal and committed to Missouri for his final two seasons.
McClellan played in 51 games over his four collegiate seasons, and he improved each season. His senior season was his best from a production standpoint, recording 8.0 TFLs and 6.0 sacks. McClellan consistently produced above-average games in 2025, including solid performances against Arkansas, Mississippi State, Texas A&M, and Vanderbilt.
Chris McClellan said the first thing he thought about when he hung up the phone was that he gets to play with @MicahhParsons11
“Man, I get to play with one of the best in the game” #GoPackGo pic.twitter.com/ZZx2q7tSYw
— Hogg (@HoggNFL) April 25, 2026
COMMENTARY:
The Packers needed to add to their defensive front, and they did so on Friday night by drafting defensive tackle Chris McClellan out of Missouri. McClellan is a big-bodied, experienced, pro-ready prospect who could come in and contribute right away for Jonathan Gannon's defense. Green Bay chose to move up from pick 84 to select McClellan over Iowa State's Dominique Orange, Oklahoma's Gracen Halton, and Florida State's Darrell Jackson Jr.
McClellan's 11-inch hands rank in the 99th percentile and immediately stand out among his physical tools. His size is complemented by good speed and agility, and his strength allows him to control offensive linemen with effective leverage. He has improved each season by developing consistent practice habits, is regarded as a strong locker room presence, and has not missed a game in four college seasons.
Despite good size and speed, McClellan posted a poor RAS score due to below-average shuttle and three-cone times, making him less of the athlete Gutekunst typically targets — though clearly not a deal breaker. The main flaw with his technique is playing too high, which costs him leverage, gets him pushed around, and throws off his hand placement. It's a correctable issue, and given his reputation for strong work ethic and consistent practice habits, there's reason to believe he'll address it at the next level.
In an interview with Justin Melo of Sports Illustrated, McClellan stated, "I developed a great routine. I watched tape. I knew how to approach the game. It went beyond practice and extended to things like recovery, sleep habits, film study, and nutrition. I’ve told every team the same thing. I’m going to come in and contribute right away. I guarantee that I’ll earn the respect of my coaches and teammates. I’m ready to play ball and help the team."
McClellan is coming to Green Bay with the right mindset. After being drafted, he shared, "I can play anywhere across the line, and that's what I'm going to do. Wherever they need me to go, I'll go and play and contribute and help the team in whatever way I can. I don't care if I have to be a zero-nose or a five-technique. I just want to go in there and learn from all the guys there and try to soak up as much knowledge as I can...It's one of the most legendary franchises in the league, and the expectation is to win games year in and year out."
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Carter Semb is a lifelong Packer fan, shareholder, and season ticket holder. He is a contributor for Cheesehead TV and Packers Talk. For commentary surrounding Wisconsin sports, he can be found on X at @cmsemb.
__________________________
Comments (130)
LeotisHarris
April 24, 2026 at 09:05 pm
Crap, he was born in North Tulsa, and is not a natural knee-bender.
LambeauPlain
April 24, 2026 at 09:12 pm
Doesn't need the deep knee bends...he has massive claws.
Gave up a 5th to go up and get him...seems the D coaches are winning with Team Gutey so far. They must like him.
Oppy
April 25, 2026 at 08:56 am
All interior linemen need deep knee bends..Just sayin'.
Low center of gravity = leverage advantage
lol
Houndog
April 25, 2026 at 10:10 am
Lambeau,
Haven't we seen enough 'Bent Knees' over the past few years?
TKWorldWide
April 24, 2026 at 09:17 pm
But he can be rotational! That sounds good to me.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 09:35 pm
I liked that McClellan had production numbers to back up his play. 6 sacks, 8 TFL, 2 PBU, 1 FF, 1FR, and 48 Tackles, 2 fewer than Wooden had, in his 13 game season. That, and he played all 51 games in his college career. Getting both pass rush and run stop a huge plus for a player who projects best at NT.
Appreciating this pick at 77 quite a lot.
PFF: 78.2 Overall. 73.2 Pass Rush. 75.2 Run D. 9.6% Pass Rush Win Rate! 8.1% Run Stop Win Rate!
HUGE
Doofapotamus
April 24, 2026 at 09:41 pm
This wasn't pick 84, this was pick 77 that we sacrificed 160 to get. We couldn't afford to waste any picks in this draft with the amount of holes we have on the roster and it appears as though Gute may have done just that.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 09:44 pm
Oh, yeah. Sue me. Hadn’t time to see what we gave up for him. Thanks. Was shocked to see us on the clock there.
Like yourself, I hate giving up R5 to move up, but I can’t blame Gutekunst for wanting to get ahead of MIN to take McClellan, with the Vikings having lost 2 DTs this offseason.
The Packers went up and took who they really wanted. Good.
Doofapotamus
April 24, 2026 at 09:51 pm
I wasn't nitpicking you, I was highlighting the fact that Gute likely pissed away another third round pick and managed to waste a 5th rounder as well to do it.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 09:53 pm
Yeah, it’s all good bro. Tired af. Really, I was stunned he moved up, but got it when I saw MIN likely about to take him. I think McClellan was a great pick there.
My guess is Gutekunst grabs another NT before this draft is done.
Doofapotamus
April 24, 2026 at 10:09 pm
I think OL depth is a much more pressing need but we'll have to wait and see how the rest of the draft shakes down. Round 4 is usually Gute's bread and butter.
dblbogey
April 25, 2026 at 07:27 pm
LOL at all the "experts" in here.
Swisch
April 24, 2026 at 09:28 pm
Leotis, do you have a qualm with living on Tulsa time?
LeotisHarris
April 25, 2026 at 10:38 am
Nope, I was born to just walk the line.
greengold
April 25, 2026 at 11:41 am
You’re killin’ that, man! Way to BE!
golfpacker61
April 24, 2026 at 09:09 pm
McClellan was one of my DT picks for the Pack. He has some pass rush skills too. With another 15 lbs he could be a nice dual purpose defender.
This pick is maybe an early glimpse of what the Packers will do in free agency after the draft as Dani Dennis-Sutton was available here too. Maybe a FA Edge rusher is on the horizon later on.
GregC
April 24, 2026 at 09:13 pm
I've been reading up on him, and the popular opinion seems to be that he is not a good pass rusher. So how did he get six sacks last season as a DT? Maybe just clean-up sacks?
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 09:40 pm
He’s not athletic enough to be a great pass threat and he gets far too upright far too often to be a nose in any true sense. He’s not able to anchor consistently or out leverage defenders. That’s why he played so little nose.
If he does get low, use his arms then he will get into the backfield and his reach then comes into play. He will get more sacks than, say, Orange, but he doesn’t anchor as well or even consistently if run at. Players get under his pads regularly. He’s good at getting hands on a back in a gap, but he will also get moved out of the way. That’s why, despite his sacks, he was consistently outside the top 100.
We traded a 5th for a player who is a decent run playing 3tech, using his length. He would probably have been there in the 4th. I have no idea how he fits unless he’s a conversion project and they can teach him bend (which is rare).
dblbogey
April 25, 2026 at 07:29 pm
" He would probably have been there in the 4th." Got any facts to back that up, or just babbling again ?
Starrbrite
April 24, 2026 at 09:41 pm
Good question GregC.
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 10:54 pm
"Two-year starter who is solidly proportional with adequate length. McClellan is not a natural knee-bender, which limits his anchor, and he allows blockers too far into his frame too often. He has flashes where he can dominate a rep, but he will need to improve his take-on technique and hand usage to be more consistent.
His first step is average and his pass rush isn’t overly explosive, but McClellan can pry open edges with strong hands. He plows through to collapse pockets once his foot is in the door and projects as a backup nose tackle in an even-front defense."
Lance Zierlein. This is representative of a pretty unified expert consensus.
Doofapotamus
April 24, 2026 at 09:42 pm
Every report I've read on him says he has virtually 0 pass rush capability.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 10:20 pm
20 Pressures, 11 Hurries, 6 QB Hits, 6 sacks in 2025 says differently. Not a single iDL for the Packers came close to those numbers.
Doofapotamus
April 25, 2026 at 01:07 am
Lol. McClellan had almost 300 pass rush snaps and 20 pressures to show for it, less than a 7% pressure rate. Wyatt had 22 pressures, 16 hurries and 4 sacks in 10 games with a 10% pressure rate. Karl Brooks had 25 pressures and 22 hurries with a 6.5% pressure rate and he was terrible. Warren brinson had 11 pressures and 9 hurries on only 150 pass rush snaps. All of the other guys not named Colby Wooden barely got playing time because they were awful and couldn't stay healthy even on a limited basis. The only thing they were missing were the sack numbers because the quarterbacks didn't stand still for most of the sacks that McClellan benefitted from after his lineman whiffed on their blocks. How do you think McClellan will do against the Lions and Bears offensive lines or against quarterbacks like Murray and Williams?
TKWorldWide
April 25, 2026 at 07:45 am
He’ll…dominate??
Thegreatreynoldo
April 25, 2026 at 11:19 am
LOL!
Oppy
April 25, 2026 at 11:30 am
The real question is why everyone seems to believe the only role NFL DT's fill is rushing the passer. Some guys' roles are to stay home, eat blocks and tackle anything coming through the A gaps.
It's called defensive integrity up the middle, and a 3-4 front in particular won't be very effective without it.
I suspect the long term application of McClellan's talents at the NFL level project to this type of role. Not very glamorous, but essential.
greengold
April 25, 2026 at 11:56 am
Oppy! What we are seeing firsthand is how rare it is to find an effective NT equally adept v both run & pass, with real production numbers to prove it.
Just a great get by both Gutekunst & Gannon.
Oppy
April 25, 2026 at 01:44 pm
I don't particularly believe McCellan has the ability to be an adept pass rusher at the NFL level, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 10:22 pm
I’m more worried about his tendency to let linemen under his pads and lose leverage. That’s why Ford has never established himself despite the ability to penetrate or anchor when he did.
TKWorldWide
April 25, 2026 at 07:45 am
Pad level!!!
Houndog
April 25, 2026 at 08:52 am
Oh Really?
I think you'd better read more, son!
Six sacks last season, along with some really decent stats, improved every year, long arms, huge hands, and the non-measurable, a great attitude!
Some of that just might be what Ron Wolf often spoke of when he said "Yeah, I've seen the scores, and I don't care, he's a Football Player'!
B. J. Raji looked like shit on paper coming out of the draft, and I doubt you'll hear or see anyone complaining about him.
Thegreatreynoldo
April 25, 2026 at 11:25 am
BJ Raji, the 9th pick in the draft, was an absolute monster with outstanding physical traits. He did not look bad in any way, shape, or form. The knock on him was work ethic. I used to warn all the time to be careful about giving Raji any guaranteed money on his 2nd contract because he did not like football.
Oppy
April 25, 2026 at 11:35 am
Raji should have never been played as a NT. Ryan PIckett was a far better nose.
Raji was soft as hell against the run, he'd get rolled off the LOS by 3-5 yards regularly. sub par anchor for NT play.
What Raji was: a deceptively mobile and agile large man. He was a natural penetrator. He was a finesse player. 3 tech all day long.. but he was absolutely not ideal at the nose tackle position. I think the Packers miscast him for a good deal of his time in GB.
Oppy
April 25, 2026 at 11:38 am
Side note, I agree with your assessment about Raji and love of football.
He wasn't in football because he loved it, he was in football because he was good at it and it was a high paying job. There's nothing wrong with that at all.
He made his money and when his family needed him, he left and never came back. Good on him; realized he had made enough money and prioritized his family.
jannesbjornson
April 24, 2026 at 10:00 pm
He gets under the offensive lineman's pads fast and has a quick first step. His size is just right, similar to Kenny Clark. He is faster to the spot than Orange.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 10:18 pm
YESSSSSSSSS!
Oppy
April 25, 2026 at 11:40 am
Kenny Clark only gets away with his size at the position because he has rare strength at that size.. really rare strength for his size.
This young man is going to need to put on weight if he's going to play nose tackle in the NFL. He's not Kenny.
For what it's worth- I love Clark, and I think McClellan has a shot to be a very good player in the league- but I don't think anyone should justify McClellan's playing weight by comparing it to Clark's because the functional strength is a huge part of that equation, and very few 310 lbs DL have the type of balance, leverage, and strength that Clark has. He's just built different.
MooPack
April 24, 2026 at 09:12 pm
I was hoping Orange, but this kid works. Long arms and huge hands at 11". As long as he can hold point and free up Wyatt and the LB's to make plays. Has some pass rush. The Packers obviously saw enough to trade up to pick 77. Gave up their lower 5th.
[Edit] Looks like a good decision after the Jags and Queens both took DT's right before the 84th pick. Queens got Orange.
GregC
April 24, 2026 at 09:15 pm
Surprising that they traded up for this guy. I thought when they traded up, they would go for Domonique Orange, or maybe another CB.
It's good that they have addressed their biggest needs with their top two picks, so they will have a lot of freedom to pick their highest-rated players on day three.
Packerpasty
April 24, 2026 at 09:30 pm
This guy they didn’t need to trade up for…what didn’t they like about the big orange guy I wonder? We’ll see how this works out two times next season when they play the vikes..
GregC
April 24, 2026 at 09:47 pm
I'm assuming they traded up for a reason--not only that they liked him a lot, but that they had reason to believe another team was going to grab him--maybe because he looks like he has more pass rush ability than Orange.
Still a bit of a head-scratcher in the 3rd round, although not on the level of Ty'Ron Hopper.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 10:37 pm
Hey GregC. Orange has no range at all. He stops chasing. Turns his motor on when he wants to. Makes very few plays outside his area. Super late to shed blocks. Zero pass rush. Production fell in 2025.. McClellan’s production shot through the roof.
We got the ascending talent Dane Brugler felt projected best at 0-1T. Orange was descending, and lacks discipline.
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 10:43 pm
I don’t think that accurately conveys quite what Brugler was intending when he used that language, if you read the whole summary. In fact, most analysts are pretty much in consensus on Mclellan and his strengths and weaknesses.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 11:08 pm
The production numbers do not lie.
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 11:20 pm
They also don’t necessarily translate
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 11:40 pm
Wtf is that supposed to mean? Seriously, Coldworld?
Brugler is not the only game in town, nor Zierlein. This from Lindy’s:
“Highly productive senior season, with 6 sacks, 48 tackles, and 2 pass deflections. Has prototypical size for a defensive tackle and is an above-average athlete to boot. His hands might be made of cement as, when he does land his strikes, he can toss blockers around with ease. Active hand fighter who consistently looks to knock punches away. Motor can be inconsistent at times but, when he’s hot, looks to chase players across the field. Has the leg power and overall power to drive blockers backward, creating disrupted running lanes and collapsed pockets.”
From Athlons:
McClellan is a well rounded defender with intriguing upside whose size gives him an advantage as both a run defender and a pass rusher. He’s physical at the point of attack, using active hands and a relentless motor to work through contact, and his awareness and technique as a tackler ensure that ball carriers rarely get away once they are in his grasp. He’s got an explosive first step, and his surprising quickness makes him a challenge when he’s rushing the QB from the inside. He plays with polish and intelligence that should make his transition to the NFL that much easier.”
I think we all understand the standard, the high bar. Vince Wilforks are rare, and getting close even more so at Pick #77. Let’s give the guy a chance to show he belongs. You seem to be overtly trying to discredit his merits. Those both born with and those he’s worked hard to attain.
Thegreatreynoldo
April 25, 2026 at 11:29 am
You're suggesting that statistics can't lie?
murf7777
April 25, 2026 at 07:07 am
Why is it a head stratcher? They needed a DT and went up to get the one they wanted. I like that he improved every year and that he was very productive last year. They thru RAS out the window on this pick, we’ll see how it goes.
GregC
April 25, 2026 at 12:05 pm
He was a consensus #130, and they picked him at #77 and traded up to get him. Also, his RAS was quite low, at 6.1. So kind of a surprise. That doesn't mean it was a bad pick. I like him better after watching highlights and reading more about him.
dblbogey
April 25, 2026 at 07:32 pm
Several teams wanted him. The Packers moved up so they could get him.
Doofapotamus
April 24, 2026 at 09:19 pm
I wouldve taken a lot of guys over this one. Dunker would've provided depth at multiple positions, Mike Washington would've been an ELECTRIC pick at RB, could've doubled down at CB, could've taken Big Citrus, or hell, there's a 95% chance he would've been there when GB picked at 84. Time will tell if this was the move but this seems like a typical super reach by Gute in the third round and he traded away one of the precious few picks we have in this draft to do it.
Starrbrite
April 24, 2026 at 09:45 pm
Doof—I don’t believe it was a super reach.
Doofapotamus
April 24, 2026 at 09:48 pm
The guy has absolutely no pass rush ability and is both undersized and one of the worst athletes at the position in this draft. I say super reach loosely because they traded away one of their precious few picks to get a guy that more than likely would've been there when we were originally picking.
RacineTom
April 25, 2026 at 05:52 am
6 sacks last year just proves you're wrong about that. Who is your actual favorite team?
jaxpackfan
April 25, 2026 at 08:28 am
95% chance he would've be there at 84? And how do you know this?
DoubleJ
April 25, 2026 at 08:34 am
If one team viewed him as a top 100 pick then there were 5 others that did as well. He was 108 (early R4) on the consensus big board so getting him at 77 (mid R3) isn't that much of a reach. Teams also have an idea what other teams are going to do. The Jags (81) and Vikings (82) both took a DT in within a couple picks of the Packers at 77.
Bear
April 25, 2026 at 10:40 am
SCOUTING REPORT: WEAKNESSES Domonique Orange
Tackling consistency is a real concern; missed tackle rate climbed sharply as a senior.
Very limited pass rush production; just one career sack across four college seasons.
Struggles to disengage from blocks once locked up; shed quickness needs significant work.
Tends to play with a narrow base, which leaves him vulnerable when combo blocks sustain contact.
Overshoots the backfield on penetration; needs to learn to break down in the hole.
Below-average lateral agility and body control when asked to redirect or slide with moving targets.
Slow testing numbers raise questions about range and pursuit ability at the next level.
Swisch
April 24, 2026 at 09:22 pm
It seems as though he has some bulk to clog up the middle on runs and some athleticism to get to the quarterback on occasion.
That appears to be a good combination.
As always, we have to hope the Packers front office sees how this kid is going to fit in with the team and how he's going to make an impact.
A relevant question is who else was available at his position or other positions of need?
The_Justicar
April 24, 2026 at 09:29 pm
I watched him play at Florida before he transferred to Missouri and saw him play there. I hope he hasn’t reached his ceiling cuz he was just ok in college. Nothing special. To me, not worth trading up for and giving up a decent pick in next years deep draft. Just didn’t seem necessary at all.
TKWorldWide
April 25, 2026 at 07:51 am
Gave up a pick in next year’s draft? I thought they gave up a 5th in this year’s.
Houndog
April 25, 2026 at 09:08 am
They did, this year's fifth rounder is correct!
I'm guessin' nobody's buying on all those picks we'll supposedly have (and supposedly not need) next year?
DoubleJ
April 25, 2026 at 08:35 am
The Packers parted with pick 160 (original R5) in this year's draft.
Doofapotamus
April 24, 2026 at 09:45 pm
This guy is one of the least athletic DT's in the draft who has no pass rush ability whatsoever.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 10:42 pm
BS.
Doofapotamus
April 25, 2026 at 12:55 am
Try me. His RAS and intangibles are garbage outside of his wing span. He has one move, it's a bull rush and he stands up too tall ck stantly leading to him being stonewalled by anything better than sup-par lineman. He's not a good athlete compared to the rest of the class.
Coldworld
April 25, 2026 at 08:17 am
His RAS is lower (6.01) than Stackhouse’s (6.21), both scored as DTs. They both had exactly the same 10 yard split, though Stackhouse tested 14 pounds heavier than McClellan’s 313.
The only thing I can come up with is that while McClellan played very little NT, he played a lot of 0 and 1 technique. He is really the only relevant player in the draft who did. Does Gannon really want to incorporate that as a significant element in his D scheme?
Oppy
April 25, 2026 at 09:03 am
"The only thing I can come up with is that while McClellan played very little NT, he played a lot of 0 and 1 technique."
I'm not sure what semantics crusade you're on, but if you're a defensive lineman and you're playing 0 tech or shading the center... you're playing the nose tackle position.
;)
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 11:28 pm
That’s overstating it. If he gets bend and wins leverage he can swim and use his arms to pry his way behind the line and swallow up a back or QB fast. It just doesn’t happen very often and it’s pretty much his one trick.
Moreover, he really struggled to anchor against the run because he loses leverage and gets moved. Try to run past him and he’s a beast if he can disengage. Run at him and he’d often leveraged out of the way.
He’s not going to hold up as a traditional NT on a regular basis. To me that was what we needed and then some disruptive ability beyond that. If I were scheming for him, it would be run right at him early and often. As strange pick for our particular DL room therefore.
Doofapotamus
April 25, 2026 at 12:57 am
That's exactly my point. He has one move and it's a bull rush. He constantly gets stood up when trying that and the play is over if he can't get his hands on the runner.
murf7777
April 25, 2026 at 07:11 am
You’ve got to give the GM and coaching staff the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure they know exactly the type of player they’re after. I don’t think they value someone who only plays NT as much as some here do. Personally, I believe versatility is more valuable than a player like Orange, who’s likely just a one or two down guy and doesn’t offer much in terms of pass rush.
jaxpackfan
April 25, 2026 at 08:30 am
Neither did Orange, and this guy is more versatile.
dblbogey
April 25, 2026 at 07:34 pm
Doof is desperate for attention.
Packerpasty
April 24, 2026 at 09:23 pm
Trade up for a rotational project!! Perfect!! Reclaiming the North! Get that bad taste of five losses in a row to end the season out of our mouths….
Major Snafu
April 24, 2026 at 09:59 pm
A so so 5'10 under sized cb who analyst say needs work. he lacks skills followed up by a dt who can't stop the run, get off blocks and lacks speed to pass rush and we gave up a needed fifth rounder for?
I thought Gutt gave up drinking.
GregC
April 24, 2026 at 10:03 pm
He's not 5'10". Google is your friend.
Doofapotamus
April 24, 2026 at 10:06 pm
Are you talking about Cisse? He is 6' tall and was a projected borderline first round pick with great athletic traits, great run defense and man coverage skills. The DT assessment sounds good but knocking Cisse is just silly.
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 11:36 pm
He’s 1 3/4” taller than Jaire (5’10”) but 7 pounds lighter per the combine. That’s usually pretty accurate.
NitschkeFan
April 24, 2026 at 10:16 pm
You keep lying on your posts, why? You have been corrected multiple times.
You repeat that he is undersized at 5'10" when all sources say he is 5'11.6"
What is wrong with you? Fake news troll like your daddy? Junkie like your momma? Unemployed bitter incel like your brother? Pedophile like your favorite politician?
Get a life loser.
Bitternotsour
April 25, 2026 at 09:34 am
That's only what Dane Brugler had to say about him, if you check out some of the other evaluation services you'll find even more damning assessments.
DoubleJ
April 25, 2026 at 08:37 am
All rookies are projects.
stockholder
April 24, 2026 at 09:28 pm
With the Vikings taking orange.
It's obvious why they traded up.
If they get him to play Low.
He will be a good player.
Starrbrite
April 24, 2026 at 09:47 pm
That’s what I think Stock, the Vikings had eyes for him—we weren’t having it!
Major Snafu
April 24, 2026 at 10:02 pm
he played in top college programs for four years and has all these flaws?
I'm considering him as a back up fill in player never a starter. Apparently Gutt feels 2e
don't need much. Ya gonna be a long season.
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 11:44 pm
If they can get him to play low you are right. However, thats not something that can often be changed that much by this point.
He probably needs to add 10 pounds of functional mass and his hand technique to shed blocks needs considerable refinement.
Bear
April 25, 2026 at 10:50 am
He played last year at 323 pounds.
Houndog
April 25, 2026 at 09:23 am
Thanks, Stockholder, you're not always that positive. :)
I've read a lot about DTs over the past week, and while opinions are always mixed, nobody trashed the kid and despite his RAS score he rated pretty well overall, a lot due to his 'immeasurables', consistent annual improvement, and attitude.
He'll be joining Devonte Wyatt, Javon Hargrave and Micah Parsons, and if each can teach him one or two things, he might be what we've been waiting for.
mnbadger
April 24, 2026 at 09:42 pm
Packers' coaching will have him looking like Chris Jones in no time!
GPG!
Alberta_Packer
April 24, 2026 at 09:43 pm
Pretty well all the pass rushing DTs will be gone in the 1st and 2nd rounds. So the Packers real need was for a run-stopping, lane-clogging DT. Especially if they are going to play some 3-4. Ostensibly - mission accomplished.
Starrbrite
April 24, 2026 at 09:43 pm
I think it’s an excellent pick at position of need. He’s gonna help.
Whataya ya’ll believe about taking qb Cole Payton if we can get him as a 5th?
Coldworld
April 24, 2026 at 11:48 pm
It was pushing it to squeeze in a QB with our needs previously. Now we just burned a 5th it would be to the point of supreme folly to take one, regardless of which of this class it were. We have McCord as a potential PS squad 3rd QB. I’m not sure I see better remaining. I think we will pick up a UDFA to compete and take reps.
Bitternotsour
April 25, 2026 at 09:38 am
As a smokescreen the QB thing makes sense. As an inducement for the best available undrafted QB, well, you can't go wrong hyping your need for a qb and establishing a path to the roster. It never hurts to let guys and their agents know that you like them and if things break right you'll pick them.
Houndog
April 25, 2026 at 09:29 am
They traded their 5th to move up for McClellan! So No, it won't happen!
LambeauPlain
April 24, 2026 at 09:56 pm
Big Mac did one thing I look for in college prospects...improvement year over year.
He grew in production playing the college game and it could be the D coaches see a high ceiling playing the NFL game. And you cannot coach 6'4", 34" arms and 11" hands attached to a young man who's motor your CAN coach...seems to run hot.
Swisch
April 24, 2026 at 10:09 pm
A commonality of our two picks tonight seems to be they are hard workers.
When in doubt, get those kind of guys.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 10:46 pm
No doubt, Availability is huge. McClellan didn’t miss 1 game in his college career.
Minniman
April 25, 2026 at 12:58 am
Agree about work ethic comment Swisch.
In this modern post-career podcast world where ex players fess up to what really goes on behind the scenes (and in some cases how lazy and unprofessional they really were - e.g. Eddie Lacy) I’m increasingly trusting commitment to their craft as one of the key ultimate evaluators.
I think that when this guy pairs with Devonte Wyatt (IR last year) and Javon Hargrave - with addition support from Karl Brooks+ Warren Brunson, we might see some more consistent interior pressure.
With floating weapons like Micah Parsons and Edgerin Cooper probing for gaps, the Packers don’t necessarily need spectacular interior defenders just consistent ones
Houndog
April 25, 2026 at 09:35 am
Lambeau,
High ceiling and coach-able were mentioned often in the reviews I read about him.
Add that to his size and wingspan, and I'll take that! He's a 3rd rounder, not another 1st round "Project" Gutey's too often blessed us with!
Major Snafu
April 24, 2026 at 10:06 pm
Having read the UN glowing assessment of the analyst, this guy will be a fill in player and not a reliable starter. He lacks speed and strength. The problem here is if our starting nose gets hurt your stuck with this guy who isn't all that good.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 10:47 pm
Trolls troll.
Thegreatreynoldo
April 24, 2026 at 10:09 pm
This is a surprise. Since no one else has mentioned the obvious, it seems like Josh Myers over Creed Humphry all over again.
I have not watched McClellan's tape. He was #13 on the draft guide for IDL. I did not go that deep into the weeds. We have folks writing that MN wanted McClellan but had to settle for big citrus. Maybe so. I hope McClellan is a pleasant surprise.
Time will tell.
Edit: Mike Renner liked the McClellan pick, indicating that was where he had the DL on his big board. He gave McClellan an A- at pick 77 and MN a B+ for taking Orange at 82.
Swisch
April 24, 2026 at 10:14 pm
Orange you glad that we picked McClellan?
Or do you think it was bananas?
Apparently, he does have a knock or two against him.
Let's hope he keeps improving.
He does seem to have the right attitude, which could help to open the door for him to succeed in the NFL.
Since'75
April 24, 2026 at 10:10 pm
Checked him out, said most of what everyone here says about him.
NFL AND BR, had him at 4th or 5th round.
Like all the picks, we'll see in time.
*********
Looks like the only person who would downvote that.
Is my very own stalker.
Well...everyone needs a hobby i suppose.
DoubleJ
April 25, 2026 at 08:47 am
Consensus big board has him at 108, an early R4. Dane Bugler has him as DT8 with Orange being DT6, DT7 Tyler Onyedim went to the Broncos at pick 66. There are plenty of people who thought he would be picked around when he was.
Houndog
April 25, 2026 at 09:52 am
Since'75,
Yes, he was often rated at a 4th or fifth.
But, if you read all the Bio's on DT's (which I did) between the 50th to the 150th pick predictions in the draft there wasn't a lot of difference, and McClellan outscored (in words, and by description) some of the 'bigger' names. High ceiling was often mentioned and for that along with his size and 'coachability' he got some pluses, aka, brownie points!
After reading too much to remember it all, all I know is that I wasn't disappointed when they chose him over 'Big Orange', (and I had checked them against each other) for what that's worth.
Since'75
April 25, 2026 at 10:59 am
Everyone relax! i didn't say whether i like him or not.
What i did say was ...
"Like all the picks, we'll see in time."
*******
If the thumbs down make ya'll happy.
Then i'm happy 😊
13TimeChamps
April 25, 2026 at 03:05 pm
Seems like someone is living rent free in your head.
Downvotes are a weird thing to obsess about, but yet it seems to be important to you. Maybe overcompensating for something? You know, kind of like your silly, juvenile avatar.
Personally, if I have an issue on here with someone, I will address it head on, not through some anonymous thumbs down. You seem to get a lot of those. If you want to put them on me, knock yourself out.
Strat
April 24, 2026 at 10:24 pm
Like the pick you get an up-vote, don't like the pick you get a down-vote. Great. When this team moves up in the draft I cringe. Probably didn't need to move up to get him. I don't have a ton of faith in this brain-room bunch. But like always with the draft, let them prove everyone wrong.
murf7777
April 25, 2026 at 07:16 am
Since 2 DT were taken shortly after, including your division rival who was known to need a DT it was obvious the Packers moved up to get the one they wanted. If it works out it will be well worth the 5th round draft pick.
Doofapotamus
April 25, 2026 at 07:51 am
It's not just a 5th round pick, it's the third round pick that was used on him. A pick Gute typically tries to throw at a dart board from a football field away and RARELY hits. His third round pick track record is absolutely abysmal.
murf7777
April 25, 2026 at 09:53 am
Yes, what I meant was an add'l 5th round pick.
Starrbrite
April 25, 2026 at 08:04 am
Agree Murf.
Thegreatreynoldo
April 25, 2026 at 12:26 pm
It seems that way, but I suggested it was a case of taking Josh Myers over Creed Humphrey and I did not get any downvotes.
I don't mind trading up. With last year clearly in mind - when all the defensive linemen I liked came off the board higher than expected - it seems like a position that teams have to be proactive to fill if they pick later in each round.
I don't think McClellan is a total stiff. I don't like big citrus as much as some of the media (looking at Justis Mosqueda and Tex Western over at APC) but I think McClellan is closer to Tederall Slaton than he is to Orange. I think McClellan has a chance to be an all around player but I don't think he can actually stuff the run as a rookie. Maybe they can develop him - the raw size is there but I don't see the desired athletic ability.
splitpea1
April 24, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Reserving judgment here as to whether or not he was worth the trade-up. McClellan was one of the best remaining at the position left, so the need did get addressed.
One of the ways McClellan wins is with his huge hands (comparable in size to Shaq), but you have to get him to play lower. He's versatile and a disruptor, but not surprising, needs to add to his moves. Both areas of improvement will take time.
A very detailed scouting report can be found on the Buc's "Pewter Report" if you really want to get in the weeds. It's interesting, though.
***
I have to congratulate Gute for not throwing us any curve balls tonight. Both picks made sense and weren't overdrafted (or so it seems right now)... I think Cisse has the chance to be a really good one once you get him developed.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 11:37 pm
Trade up was kind of a curve, and… not! Lololol
Starrbrite
April 25, 2026 at 08:06 am
Split—That’s what I believe also, i.e., Guty didn’t overthink these picks.
Bear
April 24, 2026 at 11:04 pm
SCOUTING REPORT: STRENGTHS McClellan
323 pounds and he carries it well -- proportional build with enough length that he checks the NFL body box at nose tackle without needing to add weight before training camp.
Tackling grade is excellent and the film shows why -- once he locates the ball carrier, his pursuit angles are sharp and he finishes plays, which not every big interior guy can say.
One-on-one against single blockers he's a problem; wide base, hard to move, and he takes on blocks with the kind of anchor that makes running at him a losing proposition.
Block recognition is better than average -- he doesn't get caught sleeping on down blocks or fold blocks, stays in his gap more often than not and keeps himself clean enough to make plays.
The bull rush has genuine pop when his pad level is right -- he's collapsed pockets on tape, and his hump move has flashed as something worth developing at the next level.
His hands are legitimately big, among the best in this class, and on reps where he punches on time he controls the block and sheds clean -- that's the version of him you're betting on.
Two full seasons of starting-caliber production in the SEC is not nothing -- 8.5 sacks, 13.5 tackles for loss, and he held up on a real snap count against real competition.
Showed enough hip fluidity to work a swim move when given the chance, so there's at least a second gear in there as a pass rusher, even if it hasn't shown up consistently yet.
greengold
April 24, 2026 at 11:32 pm
Exactly! Adding to that is there’s a lot of ceiling with this player. He’s got all the traits and physical gifts of a difference maker at 0-3, with a resume of production. McClellan seems like a great prospect to develop further from R3.
You can’t teach that kind of size & length. 6-4 313, 5.05 40 Time, 34”arms, 11” hands, 83.25” wingspan, 9’ broad jump…
PFF: 76.8 Overall, 72.8 PR, 73.2 Run D… find another player projected to NT/ 0-1T with a more balanced set of grades in this draft.
Altogether, a versatile iDL who fits Gannon’s D. Think he didn’t want him? Taking McClellan was very likely one of Gannon’s prized players available to GB from this draft. Gutekunst isn’t going to saddle his new DC with anything less.
Ferrari-Driver
April 25, 2026 at 12:01 am
"I’ve told every team the same thing. I’m going to come in and contribute right away. I guarantee that I’ll earn the respect of my coaches and teammates. I’m ready to play ball and help the team."
Well, thus far he has talked the talk...now I hope he will walk the walk.
egbertsouse
April 25, 2026 at 06:57 am
No comment. Never heard of this guy. Missouri football is not on my radar.
Starrbrite
April 25, 2026 at 08:08 am
I have two close friends from St. Louis—they both gave the picks high marks.
murf7777
April 25, 2026 at 07:18 am
I just hate it that Gutey filled two of our biggest needs on the team with the first two picks. Build the trenches Gutey!
Bitternotsour
April 25, 2026 at 09:44 am
it had to be said. build the foundation for future criticism, perhaps add in a speculative 3rd and 5th round alternative, sit back, get ready to rumble.
HarryHodag
April 25, 2026 at 08:13 am
He's initially going to be a rotational player inside with Wyatt and Hargrave. He has the size. Like all rookies he'll need to be schooled which will happen.
My biggest surprise is at edge. That is a 'quiet' need. They also need a tight end. The more I thought about it linebacker is less of a need.
murf7777
April 25, 2026 at 09:56 am
I might be in the minority, but I like the Edge that we have. People are sleeping on Cox; he was a stud the last half of 2024. The two rookies will be 2nd year players and Mr. Hercules will be fine and take a step up as he was towards the end of last year. Take care of the OL next!
pantz_bURp
April 25, 2026 at 08:43 am
R-E-L-A-X all you fine folk packer backers.
I was hoping for Big Citrus, primarily in nickname. He appeared more "appealing" than our guy. But, and here is the kicker...I don't feel we will regret the pick. Big handz equal big glovz.
We seem to have invested on the D side for many moons. Let's dominate at some point and coach them up or WD40 their pursuit motor.
There better be some improvements becuz those last 5 games still leave a bad taste in mouth. Or, perhaps it's Sweet Peas cooking?
**oh hell, I just thought of this and hope da Vikes dont see it. "We got the Orange, da Pack got the Lemon". Nooooooooooo....
The young man (men) will be fine...welcome to the Packers! Letz start selling Bear Claw donuts at Lambeau Field, proudly hold them up when CM stuffs a run or causes a strip sack. My work is done...
XXXOOOs,
Pantzy
Bitternotsour
April 25, 2026 at 09:49 am
You should probably look into trademarking the Bear Claws nickname. The marketing opportunities are immense (like his hands, and those big gloves)
Spock
April 25, 2026 at 09:57 am
I've worked in bakeries. Bear Claws are made up with "old" donuts; the icing and nuts are to hide that fact and get the inventory out the door. Doesn't mean they don't taste good though! One thing I learned well while working at the bakery: always insist on getting the goods closet to you (the customer) in the display case, the ones in the back are almost always older/less fresh!
Since'61
April 25, 2026 at 09:31 am
I think that Gute has done well with both of his selections given the Packers draft position and who was still on the board at the time the Packers made their selections. Time will tell how well these players will work out. It's on the coaches now to get them ready to play. Thanks, Since '61
Oppy
April 25, 2026 at 09:34 am
Like most highlight reels of DT's, this one focuses on rushing and penetration.. that's not where his future in the NFL will take him.
He's got length and he knows how to keep guys at distance and disengage to make the tackle in the hole. He stays on assignment and lets the play come to him instead of over-pursuing. The seven plays in this highlight reel, starting at the 55 second mark, are indicative of what he should be asked to bring to the table in the NFL.
He's 310 lbs and he carries that in a deceptive manner. His frame should be able to be filled out substantially. This young man will be asked to put on 10-15 lbs by the start of the 2027 season, and maybe another 10 lbs after that. He'll have a shot at an NFL career as a massive, legitimate NT, playing at around 330, 340. In the meantime, playing at his current weight, and while developing more consistency, he'll be a more versatile interior lineman, but not dominant. Don't expect him to be a penetrating missle blowing up plays in the backfield. He'll be a good addition to run defense with a little mobility today, but has a chance to be a dominant nose controlling the point in a few years.