Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Don't want to talk about it

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

LaFleur's chat -  Our head coach spoke at the NFL Annual Meetings yesterday - here are a few tidbits.

Bringing Barry Back - I don't know about you, but when you're asked why Barry is back and your lead is it's about continuity, I don't find that a ringing endorsement. 

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

Plan for Love - LaFleur revealed that the Packers will once again hold some joint practices, being cognizant of Love needing more live reps. also to that point, he hinted that we would see Love getting plenty of playing time in preseason games. Sounds like they have a plan.

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

The Law Firm of Watson and Doubs - LaFleur spoke effusively about the second-year WR duo. Of Watson, he lauded his ability to grasp the offense and vowed that he would be running a bigger variety of routes than they gave him as a rookie. Of Doubs, LaFleur very carefully brought up a Davante Adams comparison, tempering it of course, but saying that Doubs has some Davante-type movement skills of the line of scrimmage. 

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

Rasuuuuuuuulllll - It's funny, I kept hearing EVERYONE saying Rasul Douglas would be moving to safety. Well, I guess everyone except the Packers were on that train. LaFleur flat-out said that while Rasul would be capable, that's not where they plan to have him line up. LaFleur feels strongly that Rasul is best as an outside corner, which makes for an interesting conversation of what that could mean for Eric Stokes.

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

Nixon/Savage - Adding to the Rasul discussion, LaFleur also said that Keisean Nixon is earmarked for the slot corner spot and that Savage will play at safety. That makes sense, with Adrian Amos likely gone, Savage is more needed back there at safety.

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

OT Class - I recently finished my offensive tackle analysis and rankings for the CHTV Draft Guide. I can tell you this, overall, this OT class is underwhelming compared to most previous years, especially taking into account what the Packers look for.  There's one player I consider a future All-Pro LT, maybe two that could become  Pro-Bowl LTs and a whole bunch of bigger RT types. There are 2-3 players who will definitely get overdrafted because they are the "LT type," but much improvement is needed. Finally, I always have one or two "sleepers" I feel really strongly about. This year I only have one and I'm not nearly as enthusiastic as I usually am. Yeah, it's not a great class.

Ok, I'm not going to talk about Rodgers, but I am curious what you all think given that Gutey yesterday gave a far different account of how this offseason transpired than what Rodgers told us on the McAfee show. So do me a favor, and please vote in the poll at the bottom of this post. But we don't have to talk about it...

And don't forget: The CHTV Draft Guide will be available on the CHTV Store on April 3rd and you will be able to download it right from there.  NOTE: All CHTV Patreon and Youtube "Carry the G Club" members will get a discount on the guide.

 

 

 

 

Who do you believe more - Aaron Rodgers or Brian Gutekunst?

Aaron Rodgers
9% (8 votes)
Brian Gutekunst
91% (78 votes)
Total votes: 86
 

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
11 points
 

Comments (228)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
NickPerry's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:38 am

"I don't know about you, but when you're asked why Barry is back and your lead is it's about continuity"

Yup, lets worry about continuity when you have seven 1st round drat choices lining up and you still look completely lost most games and continue to make the same mistake again and again. Hmmm, I wonder what he said about keeping and promoting Drayton as ST Coordinator after 2020?

Love...So glad there's a plan for Love. I understand he needs playing time, but don't get stupid with him and play him longer than he should be out there and have some overzealous UDFA tear up his knee. I think he THRIVES in this offense.

Watson and Doubs...I'm STOKED to watch these two this season. We keep talking about the jump Watson will make and I think he will, ESPECIALLY seeing the REAL MLF offense and not the watered down version Rodgers insisted on running. But Doubs was pretty impressive last season until he got hurt. There's A LOT to be excited about... NOW, lets ADD to the WR and TE group in the draft...EARLY!

No Douglas at Safety? Savage AT Safety? I think I'm going to be sick. Get ready Rudy Ford!

Gute or Rodgers?... I TELL you who I voted for since I've hardly ever commented recently on what I think of Rodgers. ; )

I believe Gute without a doubt. Now I'm sure there was a little extra thrown in by Gute but all in all I believe Gute. All I know is I CAN'T WAIT when talking about the GB Packers QB, it's all about FOOTBALL and not everything other God Damn thing not related TO Football. Like darkness, body cleansing, or Ayawaska!

Wow, what a concept!

15 points
21
6
Bearmeat's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:46 am

You have to think that they're going to draft a safety then, right? I mean, Gute said some things that would lend themselves to Rasul at safety just before MLF talked. But if it's not Rasul, then who? Certainly not Jaire. And Stokes is a CB through and through. Ford might be right as a pairing with Savage, but I'd have to think it's a draft pick...

I refuse to talk about Aaron Rodgers. Done with him. I'll clap when he has his jersey retired. When Ole #4 left, I wanted to assign his number to a backup punter. I don't hate ACR THAT much... maybe a backup WR? ;)

3 points
8
5
Rebecca's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:21 am

Joe Barry will dash your dreams.

9 points
9
0
fthisJack's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:19 am

My dreams are nightmares.

-1 points
1
2
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:01 am

Bearmeat, I’m convinced S Tarvarius Moore will be a starter, they’ll draft another to pair with him. Gutekunst is always looking to turn over the bottom of the roster too, replenishing questionable talent positions with better talents.

You can’t have enough DBs.

3 points
6
3
barutanseijin's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:30 pm

Lynn Dickey was good, but does he really merit having his number retired?

2 points
2
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:50 pm

Good but not great! No retirement!

1 points
1
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:50 pm

Good but not great! No retirement!

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:33 am

I don’t know about the level of endorsement perspective though. LaFleur has to realize that he’s very much tied himself to Barry by bringing him back, particularly in the year after the Drayton fiasco. If Barry’s D underperforms it will take a stellar offensive year to save LaFleur. I suppose with Murphy still there he might survive as a lame duck for a year, but that would say more of Murphy than LaFleur meriting retention.

Rasul at outside corner and Savage back at S and Stokes where? At least in my eyes, that makes no sense, though it’s true Stokes, who was an all rookie remember, seems to be a fish out of water, or perhaps a fish a system keeps from
The water. Sorry, that looks like 2 dubious moves to get Douglas outside.

Just increases my doubts about Barry and overall ability to use pieces to the best collective potential. Ah, that was a signature of both Barry and LaFleur/Stenovich last season. Perhaps that’s where continuity comes in. If so it is likely the continuity before a convulsion.

7 points
10
3
jurp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:10 am

In my experience, "Continuity" = "Mediocrity", as well-run organizations always strive to improve, not tread water.

4 points
5
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:15 am

While I agree with you regarding this situation, " it's about continuity" can mean the progress too. You learn from previous mistakes and make your job better. Implementing every year new system it is not easy task for success. Especially if you have ~25 different personality that you have to to make them work as one unit.

My problemwas that the system Barry was implementing really did not match strenght of the individuals, as well as the streght as the group. Changing of the system can be done by same leader (Barry), but there is the question if he will knew enough to make that changed system work properly. I, personally doubt he is capable. And that is why I'm also on the same side with many that calls for change. Nothing against Joe Barry... effective!

1 points
2
1
jurp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:27 pm

Continuity can be fine to a certain extent if you've been successful, but Scooter saying after an 8-9 season with a flame-out in a must-win game to end it that he favors continuity shows, IMO, that he's unfit for his position.

True, you don't want to rework everything each year because there is such a thing as too much change and/or change for its own sake, but successful orgs constantly tweak processes to fine-tune them

2 points
3
1
Ferrari-Driver's picture

March 29, 2023 at 03:30 pm

I remember a quote about football and I'm struggling to remember who said it...Perhaps Lombardi, but that's just a guess.

"If your not getting better, you are getting worse"

Prioritizing "continuity" is certainly not an operative word that should be attached to improvement.

-2 points
0
2
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 05:02 pm

Joe Paterno. True.

-1 points
1
2
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:20 pm

Troubling to me is that Jaire missed most of Barry’s first year, and then last year, with an even (supposedly) deeper pool of talent on D (23 returned, and 2 1st round picks added) the unit regressed. SMH.

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 05:03 pm

Sadly, Jaire is getting long in the tooth as well.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 05:17 pm

He just turned 26.

5 points
5
0
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 05:40 pm

I was trying to edit it and kept getting bounced out by pop up ads. Fuck it. I’m leaving it.

Didn’t convey what I was trying to say.

He sadly looked long in the tooth last year. Late making plays. Coming off the shoulder. I didn’t feel like he brought the juice he had before.

Oddly, NO ONE in our secondary looked as if they had improved. Rather, they all regressed significantly. Yes, a young guy on his first contract extension.

This points to coaching, especially with player accounts pointing to Jerry Gray giving instructions to perform against Barry’s wishes.

2 points
3
1
LLCHESTY's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:22 pm

I think he gets another year pretty easily unless their picking in the top 5 next year. Then a house cleaning would be in order. The big question is would Murphy be part of that or would he be allowed to pick the next group to run the franchise. Sadly I think I already know the answer to that.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:12 am

Barry...SMH.

MLF is going to be dragged kicking and screaming to AGAIN get rid of yet another pathetic assistant. I think he panics when his first coaching candidate slips through his fingers and just lunges to hire "somebody". I think his coaching network is very weak.

Rizzi for STs in 2019 was a great candidate. Then Acting GM Murphy waded in, said Rizzi wanted too much money and said no. Then Murphy relented a few days later, but Rizzi by then said "thanks, no thanks...I'm moving on."

So MLF hires Mennenga...who was clearly in over his head. MLF lets him flop around for 2 years because I also feel he is terrified to fire people. He finally does fire SM and hires his assistant, Drayton! Drayton gulps water for two years and I read others had to convince him not to bring him back for a third year! Took four years to get a competent ST coach in Bisaccia.

Pettine was held over in 2019. His group didn't do much better...so he keeps him around for year 2. That didn't go well so MLF was convinced to move on and reluctantly fire Pettine...tries to hire Leonard...great move but can't convince him. So he lunges to a crony, impetuous hire in the failed DC Barry, who continues to fail in GB.

But MLF watches a bunch of outstanding DCs become available, but impetuously decides Barry Ball will flop around again in 2023. Meanwhile, the defensive guru, Brian Flores will attack MLF's O twice a year wearing the ugly purple!

Will it be 5 years before MLF hires a competent DC? Maybe it will take a new HC to finally have solid coaching for a talented defense.

As HC, MLF is exasperating, and probably over his head too.

14 points
16
2
Guam's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:34 am

That's a distressing review of MLF's management skills and unfortunately accurate too. Well said LP.

9 points
9
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:18 am

MIke Pettine was under contract with Packers and, by their own words, they asked MLF to keep him untill contract expires. He accepted (I have no doubt looking how he was willing to avoid any confrotation!), as that was one of the conditions to get the HC job. Pettine retain has nothing to do with MLF choice!

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 05:08 pm

Sorry, I’ve never bought that beyond the fact that he was probably the team’s preferred option when KaFleur was hired, and LaFleur chose not to fight that when he probably could have. Indeed LaFleur’s justification for retaining him after 2019 is eerily similar to the one he gave for keeping Barry after the Eagles game. Asked why he decided to keep Oettine, LaFleur said:

“Yeah, there was never a doubt.” … “I’m not going to make a rash decision on one game. I thought our defense did a lot of great things. We’re looking forward to … certainly, there’s areas we have to improve upon, but it’s not just defensively. It’s on offense and on special teams, as well.”

We of course “improved” very little on Special Teams and a year later dropped off a cliff with Drayton and Pettine didn’t get better in D despite the continuity. It was rumored at the time that he told the Packers in season that he wouldn’t sign a new contract.

1 points
2
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 30, 2023 at 04:06 am

On his inaugural press conference, Mike Pettine said that he is satisfied with 3 year contract as he believe longer contracts always brings stagnation on the development and he is happy to move further, to new challanges.

So, by his words, he did not have any objection that contract expires and that he was let go.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 30, 2023 at 08:53 am

Interpret that as you will. It was thought during his last season that Pettine wanted out and had made that clear. Rather like Gray, the excuse of expiry is convenient and doesn’t rock the career boat in an incestuous league.

0 points
0
0
4thand10's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:33 pm

Look at how long they held onto capers….the league was evolving around him and his system became obsolete. Pettine put us in the top 15 D once.I thought he had a chance , but regressed for one reason or another.Barry…as much as i dislike him, he is capable of adjustments…he’s just really really freakin late making em. This last year wasn’t about the D, this D was actually capable of red zone stops…which, well, it’s been awhile since i seen that. Clock management on the O, red zone on the O and completion % s were the issue this last year. Then toss in 6-7 games of abhorrent drops on special teams. But I believe special teams will be decent this year. I hope Barry learns his lesson on off coverages and it’s thrilling to see what Love can do. But we need another Clark, we need a TE or 2 but the db room is pretty deep. It’s sketchy with Douglas on the outside because i had seen him get burned deep a handful of times…so I think safety help over the top with him is a necessity. 1st 15 yards he’s great, but 20+ yard pass plays, I do question him being alone on the outside.

2 points
2
0
coolhand's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:11 am

So, Minnesota fired their DC even though they made the playoffs. We missed the playoffs with a poor DC and MLF keeps him for continuity? I really question this train of thought.

10 points
10
0
jurp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:28 pm

I think Scooter's train of thought might have derailed somewhere between the field and the locker room after the second (!) Detroit loss.

1 points
2
1
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:43 am

Al, I kid you not, but, this is how I just read your lead in:

“I don’t know about you, but when you're asked why Barry is back and your head is about to explode…”
(adjusts glasses)

LOL. It’s early. It was too funny not to share.

Love the plan.

Watson & Doubs are going to explode onto NFL secondaries. Love, with that quick release, and the arm strength & accuracy for two deep ball aficionados?

Look out!

Suuul!!! I like it. Moving corner to safety is just not an automatic thing.

Nixon being integrated to slot coverage and keeping Savage makes sense. I’m hoping to see Savage bounce back to being the player we drafted him to be. I’m a Stokes fan left wondering myself. Maybe his ankle and knee injuries v. DET that finished his season are more severe than we know. Hoping for the best for Eric Stokes, and his healthy return.

OT class - Totally agree it’s light up top, but I do think there’s some good value players smattered throughout.

I’m always reminded of David Bakhtiari’s draft profile, and how skinny he was when he came in to start at LT as a rookie.

Almost all of them need sand in the pants, which is cured by a year or two of pro-level training tables plus the training.

I’m a little more encouraged than you are with this OT class, but I get what you’re talking about. There’s one in a class all his own. Another just a notch below, a small notch, then a group of around 3 you can be excited about, another 8 to 12 stretching into Day 3 that could get the job done.

A couple OGs I like who really are OGs…!!! (TK - yo.)

There’s some Centers to be had.

5 points
13
8
Rebecca's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:19 am

Hilarious.

0 points
3
3
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:21 pm

Same page, amigo!

0 points
1
1
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:29 pm

Man, I'm still laughing from that line yesterday... Nice work!

For shits & giggles, check out nfldotcom's take on Bakhtiari "Weaknesses:"
___

Not an ideal build for an offensive lineman, thin in arms

Many difficulties arise from pass blocking on an island

Beaten around the edge without slowing the rusher down and can lose face up against stiff contact due to not having the ability to stop backwards momentum

Move to Guard is likely in his future

Deep drop steps aren't natural and stiff contact jolts him mid-stride

Loses on counter moves, thrown to the side when top heavy or leaning too far over, specifically when run blocking

Whiffs on cut blocks
___
LOL. I reference this just about every draft when I study the OL... Take what you read with a grain of salt, and watch as much tape as you can to best form your opinions. The eyes don't lie.

2 points
3
1
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:16 pm

For sure.
I remember that was the year they flipped Bulaga and Sitton from right to left, and then Bulaga got hurt.
Bakhtiari, from the very beginning, looked great against Clay Matthews in practice, and has anchored the left side ever since. When Bulaga returned from injury, they put him back on the right side. They knew by then that DB was an OG playing LT, baby!

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:26 pm

Correct. It really was a great part of the story, and saddest part for me and many is knowing neither Bak nor Cobb nor Davante won a Super Bowl ring with our Packers.

2 points
2
0
marpag1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:47 am

Actually, I'm not going to vote about it, either. No offense.

Thankfully, next year we will no longer need to endure all of the insufferable "move Lazard to tight end" crap. Imagine how cool it would be if MLF's comments quashed the "move Rasul to safety" crap, too! Goodness, what would people talk about?

-1 points
5
6
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:14 am

"Actually, I'm not going to vote about it, either. No offense."

Bingo.

What does it really matter if we "believe" any of them? It's a backward-looking approach that only serves to dump on and divide the fan base. Eyes forward. Moving on...

5 points
9
4
JerseyAl's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:39 am

To quote Monty Python, "Oh, you're no fun anymore..."

10 points
10
0
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:46 am

Actually I found the running total quite interesting. Whether it means anything relevant to football is a wholly different question. Probably not.

The more I read LaFleur’s comments, the less belief I have in his strategic and tactical capabilities. He talks well but what he says suggests that he struggles with the big picture.

9 points
12
3
GaryC's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:19 am

I agree re MLF. I found his presser utterly uninspiring and devoid of any enthusiasm whatsoever. (Have you seen the picture of Wes Hod listening? That was me for the full 30 mins). I have zero confidence in the guy. I hope I’m wrong and he shuts people like me up but I’m not holding my breath.

5 points
7
2
croatpackfan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:33 am

That is why I missing his part of MLF answer about Rich Bisaccia. He gave very positive and suportive answer on direct question and said a lot of good staff about him. I have no doubt that Rich Bisaccia will take on his back most of the HC responsibilities connected with unifying all phases of the team, set fire to the hearts of the players and make them to go through the wall for him. MLF will be true OC, no matter what his title says.

Some of those words were told by MLF in the answer to the reporter.

0 points
2
2
marpag1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:49 am

Geez, Al, I didn't expect a kind of Spanish Inquisition.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:02 am

I will take the comfy chair with my coffee and CardinAl Sin’s polluted thoughts though.

2 points
2
0
jurp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:13 am

I wish my chair here at home was a comfy as that one looked.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:17 am

NO ONE expects the Spanish Inquisition!

7 points
7
0
TroubleDog's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:42 am

But, what a show!

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:16 am

I am the "Upper-Class Twit of the Year!"

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:41 pm

Airs and graces indeed, Dobber

0 points
0
0
jont's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:23 am

dobber,
👍 and another 👍

1 points
1
0
Razer's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:48 am

Well, I do want to talk about Rodgers! I get the feeling that the majority of us have moved forward from Rodgers. Many of us did this last year. We know his shtick and are glad to have the Jets play his game. What I am starting to fear is that we have a front office problem.

I was optimistic when Gutekunst became the GM. Between him and Murphy, we have a lot of unnecessary talk and a fair amount of ego. Why couldn't Gutekunst keep his mouth shut about Rodgers at these team meetings?! Make up anything but don't try to make yourself look good by making Rodgers look bad. The Packers publicly burned the Rodgers bridge. Talk about throwing leverage out the window. If I were the Jets, I would downgrade my offer.

Aside from our pro scout guy, I have very little confidence that this front office knows what it is doing let alone building a championship team.

-1 points
12
13
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:21 am

As to building a championship team, the next TWO years will give us a big indication. Lotta work to do, but with a recovered cap and some extra draft picks, we shall see.

6 points
8
2
Razer's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:03 am

You are right about this timeframe. I was hoping that the Packers might get a couple of 2's and maybe a conditional pick (1 to 4) next year to contribute to this rebuild. At this point, we may get Rodgers back and a locker room meltdown.

-1 points
2
3
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:54 am

Rodgers returning and having to be cut or traded for next to nothing remains a possibility. I noted that Gute referenced that some vague interest from other teams had occurred, but has ceased after Rodgers comments about wanting to play for the Jets.

3 points
4
1
murf7777's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:13 am

CW….I’d put Arod back to GB at about 1% possibility. Odds are very low, Jets mgmt and especially the owner, is all in on bringing Arod to them. They are confident it will be done is what the owner stated. I’d say the deal is very close or he wouldn’t say such a thing. Rodgers will be a Jet.

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:24 am

I’d say not a probability, but from years of negotiating I know that the cardinal rule is that it’s not a deal till it’s signed. A secondary adage is that if all parties really want it enough the details resolve very quickly. In this transaction that’s absent. Does that mean it won’t be consummated? No, but it indicates that there’s some uncertainty. Don’t buy the urgency chatter. Both parties want it done if they are going to, the question is do they both like the approximate terms enough to make it happen?

4 points
5
1
Swisch's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:50 am

I'm always wary of human folly upsetting what seems to be a settled deal.
One concern is that the key negotiator for the Packers -- whoever he may be -- is embarrassed at giving Rodgers an idiotic contract last year, and is trying to overcompensate in the proposed trade of Rodgers to the Jets by asking for too much in return.
Please, let's not compound past idiocy with present idiocy.
Instead, lessen past idiocy with present realism.
Take a second-round pick this draft, and a conditional second-round pick next season if Rodgers does not retire.
If we can get a good player in the package, then that's a bonus.
Get it done this week, and move on.

1 points
4
3
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:57 pm

Coldworld, you're right. Don't celebrate till the contract/check is signed. 100%

As to details resolving quickly, I firmly believe they came to an agreement quickly on AR, but not the rest of the package, which I suspect is up to 3 of our starting OL players. All of the denials are meant to keep the public's interest at max ebb & flow, releasing bits & pieces up to the announcement turning this AR trade into a mania.

Deal most likely to be announced Draft Day 1, Thursday, April 27th for the biggest media splash possible.

I don't care what anybody says, the Jets OL looks more like the aftermath of a tornado instead of the wall of trusted protection AR demands. This will be a monster deal unlike anything in the modern history of this NFL. It will likely set new precedents in deal making in the NFL, if successful.

Those thinking NYJ keeps the picks and drafts their OL upgrades are disregarding AR's trust issues, and the importance of familiarity with the system.

Did you notice them talking up Bakhtiari? Well... what do you think happens after that? Runyan's OK. Myers? Better than anything the Jets have. I'm thinking it goes down like that.

The Packers are going to clean up nicely, while the Jets get instant offense air dropped into their team with a Top 5 defense.

The trade is so important to the NFL that if anything goes sideways, they'll step in to mediate it to full resolution by April 27th. Of that, I'm certain. Why? >>> AR going to the Jets is too much of a money maker for the league.

$$$$ talks.

Both parties should wind up being very, very happy, one aiming for the present, the other for the future.

1 points
3
2
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:48 pm

Peter,
I love the idea....if the Packers get enough compensation. This is not only in draft capital either. Will be very interested to see if this actually happens, or anything along the lines you indicate. I am convinced though at minimum DB is traded along with AR. Fingers crossed!

-1 points
0
1
MainePackFan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:47 am

As a last resort, there may be another option if they can't make a trade happen. The Packers and Rodgers could agree to rip up the contract and Rodgers could become a free agent. The Packers don't have a 99M dead cap hit and Rodgers is free to go to the Jets (or wherever).

I assume if both sides agree to void the contract it's possible to do it. I could be wrong, but one thing that I don't believe for a second is that AR returns to the Packers under any circumstances.

That being said, this trade will happen one way or another.

5 points
6
1
Rebecca's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:26 am

What can we do about the front office? Can we vote them out? Just asking out of frustration.

5 points
11
6
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:00 am

My gut feeling is that Gute could be a competent GM but that the post TT structure of management by committee has caused fluctuations in direction and divergences between player usage and roster formation/retention.

GMs need a 3 year plan and to stick to it. They are then judged on that plan. Looking at the roster, I believe that they had one and then blew it out of the water. The result being a wholly contradictory mess.

I don’t think Rodgers extension is the only example, only the most salient. Amari, Deguara, Dillon, now perhaps Stokes all seem to speak to it and there are probably others. Do I know this for a fact, no, because responsibility is so opaque. I see people referring to Gute as driving the trade negotiations, but Ball and Murphy do not report to him, he seems like he may well be just the spokesman to me.

I firmly believe that, with Rodgers gone, football will show whether LaFleur can lead (as a HC and through his choices of subordinates both). As to the FO, well the wisdom of LaFleur being here is in Murphy but the rest will remain too clouded to tell.

Murphy’s era, bookended by ugly divorces it seems, can’t come to an end soon enough for me.

6 points
10
4
Razer's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:09 am

All very true. The Packers need to get back to a Ron Wolf style org and they need to find a team builder GM. Gutekunst is an athlete finder. He could easily transition to a track and field recruiter when this dust settles

1 points
5
4
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:49 am

Possibly you are right about Gute, though for me, it’s very much the role of the coach to forge a team and I think we have had the pieces to do so. Again, it’s hard to judge when the GM doesn’t control the coach. I fear that we have been bedeviled not by roster but by what we have made of it.

2 points
4
2
murf7777's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:17 am

CW…..isn’t the management structure of Murphy the same as other NFL teams. Murphy = owner. Owner of an NFL team controls all aspects of the Franchise, similar to Murphy. Owner can fire anybody similar to Murphy. Owner can and many times will get involved in the draft and/or FA acquisition. Maybe I’m missing something, if so, fill me in.

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:30 am

The Murphy as owner analogy is maybe close to Jerry in Dallas (who had called himself GM). It’s more involved more often than most teams on an executive level and differs because in other teams, the contract and coaching report to the GM and the GM deals with the owner. It’s more akin to the Harlen Structure in that sense, even under Jerry.

1 points
2
1
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:23 am

Gutey was hired into a "temporary" football operation committee structure in 2018. Murphy made himself acting GM and really liked being Jerry Jones...SMH. Except Jones is making decisions with his own money.

Gutey doesn't have nearly the responsibility, accountability and power Ron Wolf or Ted had. Or even Mike Sherman for that matter.

Who is in charge of the football operation in terms of Vision, LT planning, strategy and tactics? Under Murphy's Management by Committee the operation seems year to year and a lot of status quo, little self scouting, not seeing problems & correcting them.

But the dysfunction will probably continue until Murphy retires.

3 points
4
1
Leatherhead's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:29 pm

Does this "dysfunction" we've had since 2018 account for the three straight division titles? The 47-19 record? The preparation to transition away from a 40 year old HOFer?

If that's what dysfunction looks like..........

-3 points
3
6
jurp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:14 am

The FO built a championship team in 2020. Too bad part of it choked.

3 points
8
5
Leatherhead's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:30 pm

You're not wrong.

-1 points
0
1
TacoTuesday's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:17 am

Take Branch or Baily at 15 and then move Rasul to safety.
However, we still have Barry. So 'It just doesn't matter'.

-3 points
6
9
Rebecca's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:30 am

And give them to Barrry? So underwhelming as a coach. Nice guy though.

3 points
5
2
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:26 am

Nice and stubborn. Jerry Gray, a former DC himself but one who actually had success in the NFL doing it, could not stand Barry Ball. Gray could not stand Barry's D philosophy with so many playmakers whose skills were being misapplied.

When MLF said "more Barry Ball please!", Gray couldn't leave fast enough (despite MLF asking him to stay) to begin interviewing with other teams and was quickly hired as Asst. HC/Defense for the Falcons.

Does MLF even supervise Barry and his "performance"?

9 points
10
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:36 am

We learned that he had very little active Involvement in STs and little knowledge of them as a result of what came out after Bissacia arrived. It’s quite possible he’s very hands off on D too, though one would think a little more knowledgeable.

2 points
3
1
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:02 am

Maybe, CW.

McCarthy was mostly an OC wearing a HC hat, but Mike was very decisive and assertive with the O. The one year he spent time with the D (moving CMIII to ILB), they had one of their best seasons under Capers. The next year, Mike gave the room back to Dom....

I believe Capers defenses prevented more SB appearances during the prime of Rodgers and MM's Offense.

MLF is following the same path, it seems. But we have yet to see the leadership MM had for the Offense. Maybe with Rodgers gone, who I believe had MLF completely intimidated, maybe we will see a different coaching style and leadership. Maybe not.

4 points
5
1
mrtundra's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:53 am

We may be able to snag Devin Witherspoon or Christian Gonzalez at #15. Both are dynamic CBs and both will be gone by our 2nd round picks. A few weeks ago, our Draft needs were Edge, Safety, TE, OT and WR. Now, it seems, we need a DB, or two, depending on what they do with Rasul, Stokes and Savage. As for the OL, I was hoping some of last year's draftees would step up and claim those jobs. I think every draft pick priority changes, a bit, if we get the Jet's pick at #13. or a couple more picks in the 2nd round.

-2 points
1
3
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:27 am

Gonzalez will be in the upper tier. He will not drop past ten. Witherspoon sticks like glue to the WRs and is always around the play. He is a liability in the run stop. Porter,Jr &. Brents are solid all around CBs. Stevenson and Ringo are big and fast to cover and hold the perimeter in the run stop. If one of the blue chips falls, take him @ #15

4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:21 am

So much of LaFleur's commentary on players is premature. They're going to play guys and use guys based on what's in the locker room and available when the games start. I'll all but guarantee that if they draft a CB early (and don't find another playable S) that they'll be investigating some CB's ability to play deep. Maybe they have that much faith in guys like Ford and Moore to play next to Savage, and that Savage got his head on straight at the end of 2022 enough that they think he will be OK. I'd still be looking for someone else who can play...especially someone who can handle the single-high looks.

They paid Nixon based on his ability to not just return kicks, but also to play meaningful snaps at DB--probably moreso for that. Yes, he was a great returner, but KR are fairly easily neutralized--we saw Detroit do it with directional kicking, and they pounded Nixon on his returns. Assuming Stokes comes back healthy, they have four playable CB...probably need to find one more.

OT Class--the top of the class might be underwhelming, but there are developmental guys who could be players after a year in the weight room and with additional coaching. They've aligned themselves so that they really don't need that OT this season, but they probably will in 2023--which gives guys line Jones, Walker, and a draft pick, time to show they belong. Could be the Packers draft a true, thumping OG, and there are a few of those in this class.

9 points
9
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:25 am

Right. There are still players to be added. If they, for example, view Moore as a starter, would they say so? Or would they wait until after the draft? Posturing, poker, and strategy are all in play.

5 points
6
1
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:36 am

Two CBs at minimum from this draft. Some are big guys And Fast. Some can play safety and cornerback to provide flexibility. You cannot assume Stokes comes back 100%. The CB field is one of this draft's strengths.
They need Pass Rush and a Better CB than Douglas on the perimeter. He will be torched by the faster WRs.
Edge or OT in round one. Get better.

5 points
6
1
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:24 am

"Two CBs at minimum from this draft."

It almost makes too much sense to actually happen. There's a lot of length at CB in this draft.

"They need Pass Rush and a Better CB than Douglas on the perimeter. "

There's a reason why Douglas was just hanging around on the ARZ practice squad and that was his lack of long speed and inability to flip and run. He's good if he can body up a WR or with the play in front of him where he can pllay with his eyes in the backfield, though. Sounds like a S to me.

6 points
7
1
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:32 am

If he is not moved to safety like the Woodson(s), we will know the extent of Barry's influence over LaFleur.

6 points
6
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:35 pm

I will not be surprised by whatever they do in round one.
I will also not be surprised if they do not draft a tight end, or a safety, or an edge rusher.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:45 am

Dobber, my view is in the NFL, when you need 5 solid OLinemen to play together...more so than any unit on the team...I would be drafting an OL prospect every year in rounds 1 or 2. Keep the competition in the room and replace the bottom.

5 points
5
0
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:20 am

Good LBP! Next on the list is D-line or vice-versa depending on BPA and the existing contract situations.

0 points
1
1
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 30, 2023 at 06:03 am

I agree with the sentiment. I'd modify it to one OL in the top four rounds every year with regard to centers and guards (and sometimes it turns out they can play OT), to include a first or a second round on an OT at least once every 3 or 4 years.

2 points
2
0
Packers0808's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:23 am

No matter how you figure the Barry move you still get wood under the fingernails!

5 points
6
1
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:28 am

Well then, let’s give ‘em something to talk about.

I am hopeful that Woody gets impatient and makes it happen.

7 points
7
0
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:47 am

It’s built in to their big Draft Day 1 media circus splash.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:34 pm

" I am hopeful that Woody gets impatient"

Must...
not...
post...
impatient...
Woodies...

3 points
3
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:36 pm

Could be premature.

4 points
4
0
stockholder's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:30 am

MLF said," they had to pump the brakes on Love just a bit."
Sure - Ever go down hill without brakes. No emergency Brake?
I don't need to talk about Rodgers.
Instead lets talk about why Gutey was so anxious to move on.
Of course it just fulfilled his plan when he drafted Love.
But Hate is hate. He's such a pathological liar.
And not only Do we have a bust with Savage.
I believe you can add stokes to that list too.
I prefer Douglass at CB. Learning new positions takes time.
Ot just might be in play @15.
Trading down gives us that extra pick.
But I'm not going to comment on Trading Rodgers.
And I would replace Lazard with Rashee Rice.
This team has more problems than Barry.
And with the Loses of Reed and Lowrey.
I'm not so sure Gutey shouldn't draft the DL.
Roy and Brooks just might be the killer's needed; in 4 & 5.
Ok let's not talk about Rodgers, but a FO change.

-20 points
4
24
Packers0808's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:46 am

Think point is why talk about Rodgers? What really more can be said? Yesterday I counted 17 stories about Rodgers on MSN alone before I quit doing so, imagine there were even more that came out after.

3 points
4
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:42 am

Rodgers is gone, the only questions are how and when we will know. Everything else has been said that can be until is shakes out finally.

4 points
5
1
Packers0808's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:13 am

My whole point, become verbatim in different words!

3 points
4
1
packer132's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:29 am

Front office change? I am all for Murphy retiring as are most Packers fans. No GM is going to hit on every player in a fans mind, and hindsight is great. The draft is based on past performance, and most players after the 2nd round are a question as to NFL greatness. Gute was ranked #4 in the NFL.com power rankings for GM's. Everyone can debate that, but he certainly is not near the bottom as you allude to in every post. I choose to pull for the Packers, from the top down.

13 points
14
1
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:44 am

Kleen Haus. He is in Year Six.

-1 points
4
5
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:52 pm

I see what you mean, but I disagree on a couple points:

1. The draft is also based on projecting how these players will fare in the NFL. A few years ago, Mike Golic said that scouts definitely agree on who the top college players are. It’s projecting them into the future is where it gets muddy.

2. If you go back and review even just the first round selections from previous years, ask yourself, if they’d re-draft now, would the order stay the same? Tons of examples of busts and disappointments as well as players exceeding their draft position. One of my favorites was in 2011, ten players were selected before JJ Watt, THREE TIME Defensive Player of the Year. If they redid that round a few years later, would all ten GM’s pass him over again?

I’m not saying the scouts/GMs are idiots. Not at all. Something like 80% of each year’s All-Pro’s were selected in the first two rounds. To me, the uncertainty is where the intrigue lies and where the debates begin. It’s what makes the whole thing fun, interesting, exciting, disappointing, frustrating, etc!

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:31 am

"What is the color of the sky in your world?"--Frasier Crane.

3 points
6
3
Oppy's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:51 pm

No shit Gutekunst wants to move on to Love from Rodgers.

He didn't draft a QB in R1 because he wanted to continue on with Rodgers forever.

I sometimes worry you might actually just be dim.

-1 points
1
2
stockholder's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:39 pm

Regardless how much you Love Gutey.
He still had a chance to reverse all the trade talk.
And that is the bottom line.
No matter how great Rodgers was, is, will be.
The idiot in the Gm chair, doesn't care about winning.
He is exactly the same guy, you painted Rodgers out to be.

-4 points
2
6
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:53 pm

“Oh, how closely genius and folly touch!” Denis Diderot

1 points
2
1
Packerpasty's picture

March 30, 2023 at 08:10 pm

Sure hope Love improves...a lot...he was an INT machine in college, I think he led all of the big schools at least twice in interceptions...once an INT machine always and INT machine?? lets hope not...

-2 points
0
2
Rebecca's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:31 am

Woody? 🤪

5 points
5
0
marpag1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:36 am

Yes, Woody. Woody JOHNSON, to be exact.

4 points
5
1
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:30 am

***writes and deletes inappropriate comment, then smirks about how clever I thought I was***

5 points
7
2
marpag1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:45 am

Did it have something to do with "Johnson & Johnson?" Not that there's anything wrong with that....

5 points
6
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:08 am

Aaah...it is nice to see some humor on here after the non-stop craziness these last couple of months.

5 points
5
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:35 am

Let's just hope Woody Johnson is very excited about trading for Rodgers.

His parents must have had a weird sense of humor...or his grade school chums did. Although I believe Woody's father was named Richard...and his grandfather was named Roderick.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:37 pm

Vewy Weww...we wiww wewease WODEWICK!!

--Monty Python, "Life of Brian"

6 points
7
1
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:48 pm

The laugh I didn't know I needed.

2 points
2
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:29 pm

And Wodger!

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:26 pm

Nothing wrong with avoiding the low hanging fruit.
We expect a little more from a varsity letterman. 😉

3 points
3
0
PatrickGB's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:33 am

Not moving Douglas tells me that they expect to draft a true safety, pick up a FA or use one of the ST’s guys on the roster. Keeping Barry tells me that he plans to have a serious talk with him and the new CB assistant about coverage plans. And as far as OT, I expect they draft a few because they always do. And unless a gem is unexpectedly there, it will be in the later rounds.

3 points
5
2
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:29 am

I don't think keeping Barry tells me anything about MLF except he is timid and unwilling or unable to make bold, strategic decisions.

6 points
10
4
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:38 am

"except he is timid and unwilling or unable to make bold, strategic decisions."

Doesn't that tell you all you need to know?

4 points
6
2
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:41 am

And I wish I knew I was wrong. My impression with MLF began with hope, turned to concern about leadership and personnel decisions, and is now mired in serious questions about his HC ability.

5 points
6
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:33 am

The good news is that he has no hiding place. Without Rodgers and banking on continuity, there are no excuses. Even if Love is a disaster, we will see enough to get a true feel for LaFleur. That in itself is necessary progress.

3 points
4
1
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:51 am

The journey of 1,000 miles begins with the first step. Let's hope it becomes a sprint.

2 points
2
0
jurp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:37 pm

All true, but Scooter is Murphy's guy, so even if he shits the bed will Murphy be man enough to say "I'm sorry. I made a huge mistake hiring this guy after only a one-hour interview" and fire him?

1 points
2
1
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:55 am

He used a four pick to move Up for Savage. He is Gutedkunst's guy and the option was exercised. Savage has to show as a FS. Nixon could possibly be the FS in a pinch. He plays downhill. Ford proved last season he is a backup at best and a Sp teams ace. Keep him out of the starting lineup. I like Sydney Brown if they look in that direction in rd two. Bagging both of the Jets two picks would be the hardline position. He has to secure 2023 selections. The second round will yield the Players needed to plug the leaking berm as the snow melts and flood waters approach.

1 points
4
3
murf7777's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:23 am

I think Douglas is a much better outside corner than a safety. Seems to make sense to keep playing him at that position. I agree they will draft one or two safeties in this draft.

1 points
3
2
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:37 am

Douglas hasn’t played S really, so undoubtedly at this point. He does profile better at S in future. I actually thinks it’s a move he should want to try. Though I have doubts about whether anyone will thrive as a S in the Barry D of last year.

I wonder if this isn’t more if a comment on expecting to bring back Stokes slowly and remind us that Nixon will be getting more opportunities on D, as his contract suggested.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:29 am

I've heard that they're enamored with Tariq Carpenter, who's more hybrid ILB/S than S. Maybe they think his coverage skills have improved to the point that they're willng to use him in the regular rotation?

Otherwise, yeah, I think they have to find another DB who can play S either in the draft or as guys are let go post draft.

2 points
2
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:10 am

I was impressed with Carpenter pre-draft last year. We might have something there!

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 05:42 pm

Didn’t he look completely lost in coverage when we saw him in preseason? That’s a huge leap from there in one off season. He only had 17 defensive snaps and no stats in season. He did become a staple on STs later in the season. If he clicks, he is a physical freak, but I’ve seen nothing to suggest that he has yet.

-1 points
1
2
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:35 pm

CW,
I said pre-draft was impressed with him and his athletic abilities. I also was impressed with his special team prowless. The ability is there.....let's see what comes of it.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:26 pm

I don’t deny the athlete or his ST performance last year, I just view him as a CB project on D from what little I’ve seen. That’s fine, as an athletic late pick. I was just expressing surprised to hear him spoken of as emerging as a possible part of the solution at safety. It would be great if true but the first time I’ve heard it.

1 points
1
0
LLCHESTY's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:32 pm

Jordan Battle to break the 3rd round curse at 78 works for me. Their biggest issues is safeties that can play deep and he had over 1000 snaps deep at Alabama. I doubt he's ever an All Pro but I think he could be a plus starter.

-1 points
1
2
greengold's picture

March 30, 2023 at 05:23 am

Are we talkin’ about that guy who’s 6-4 220 something?

dobs, I gots you!
__
S Tariq Carpenter 6-4 225 4.51
223 TACKLES, 7 TFL, 4 INT, 18 PD, 3 FF

Big-time tester who's much more of a linebacker than a safety. For as explosive as he is in a thick frame, his change-of-direction skill leaves a lot to be desired, and he misses a lot of tackles.
__

I’ve listened to Gutekunst very closely over the years. Came to the conclusion he holds to those players who are bigger, faster - at times, to a fault (Josh Myers, bigger, taller, but less effective).

Gutekunst is stuck on that SEA secondary of yesteryear. He was the one who drove the Kevin King bus.

There are worse secondaries to emulate than “The Legion of Boom!” Richard Sherman & Byron Maxwell at CB. Earl Thomas & Kam Chancellor (6-3 232) at Safety.

I’m not making a judgement, but simply saying this is what we may be seeing here.

The year SEA won its first Super Bowl, Cam Chancellor, The Enforcer, had greatly improved his coverage skills, rendering a white hot Jimmy Graham with NO at the time a non-factor.

Tarvarius Moore & Tariq Carpenter entering this chat is no accident, especially given all we’ve witnessed in dynamic TE play in recent playoffs.

Gutekunst likes to stack player types on his roster.

If we get the 13, paired with the 15, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Gutekunst select Nolan Smith (Quay) & Brian Branch (Savage). The problem in that scenario is Branch’s lack of speed, compared to the model of Earl Thomas, whom I believe Savage was traded for to emulate. (Savage has been a problem there too).

That Legion of Boom defense was successful because they could allow Earl Thomas to be used as a single Safety - because he had the SPEED. Chancellor was big enough to switch to that roving LB/S hybrid to cover TEs.

At LB Quay fits the Bobby Wagner mold. Nolan Smith would fit the Bruce Irvin mold, who was switched from DE to OLB that season due to his speed.

I’ll put money on it that this is what they brought Barry in for, to run that kind of defense.

1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:42 am

Bringing Barry back for continuity?!?!?! Sounds like MLF is OK with the continuity of mediocrity! Maybe he will enable Bisaccia to infuse a sense of urgency into Barry's defense.

Al your survey question needed a third choice. I don't believe either of them. They both have their own agendas and both of their agendas are self serving and not necessarily about what is best for the Packers.

Savage to safety!!?? WE've seen that movie and it doesn't end well.

A plan for Love!!! Really, I would hope so. They want to give him more snaps. They should have done that while Rodgers was injured in 2022 when the snaps would have been meaningful and showed the team if he can actually play. Instead they want to give him more snaps during meaningless preseason games when he will playing against second stringers and guys who won't be in the league when it's over. Great plan. Why not send him to college team for a few weeks. The more I hear/read MLF speak the more I hear gibberish.

If Rasul and Alexander are on the boundary what does that mean for Stokes?

Watson and doubt need to stay on the field. If that happens we'll be OK as the season progresses.

OT class. Since I haven't seen any members of the class play I can't comment on the class. However, AL knows what he is talking about when it comes to OT so if he says the class is not great I'm going with that.

Good job Al. Thanks, Since '61

9 points
11
2
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:05 am

The OTs are in round one or two. The blue chips may all be gone by #12. Anton Harrison is next in line with Darnell Wright a powerful guy to go RT. A lot of these guys are power gap dudes who will not be bull rushed in the "phone booth." He wants to stay with the Shanahan sweep, so be it. A finesse O line, once again, will not help Love.
LaFleur did have the decency to thank Rodgers for all he did for Himself and his Family.

5 points
5
0
Slim11's picture

April 03, 2023 at 12:17 pm

I'm with you on Bisaccia possibly infusing some fire underneath Barry's hindquarters.

A big part of the reason I say this is one should notice who was named an assistant HC this off-season and who wasn't. As an assistant HC, I hope Bisaccia has a green light to tell Barry to get his head out of those hindquarters when necessary.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:51 am

--As Dob mentioned, we have many T prospects on the roster hopefully 1 or 2 develop, and a young draftee CB playing center field could playout well.
-- A stud G in a mid round would be good or can one of our Ts fit there. I would go for the latter as we have other needs.
-- 2--2s this year and a 1 next year? One would think that compensation should have been worked out before announcement of a trade. Bizarro situation. However, I think Jets are in a tougher situation because we have a QB they don't.
--Barry's defense could rebound to a previous season performance. A DE/DT and a young CB/S could greatly help. Let's not forget, 6 against the pass, 26 versus run.

5 points
5
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:12 am

Chase ILBs are not run stoppers.

4 points
5
1
Untylu1968's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:56 am

Here's a super sleeper RT prospect for one of our 7th-round picks. Jake Witt from Northern Michigan University. The kid is raw and an athletic freak! Plus, he's a yooper, so you can't go wrong..

4 points
4
0
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:57 am

Al, you forgot a ballot box. I can't believe everything either said and, believe some of what both said. They'd make top notch politicians.

They might be planning on teaming Savage over the top of Rasual and leaving J.A. on an island. Might work, just not all the time.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 07:58 am

LaFleur's chat -
I don't know why this is not the year to rip off that bandaid. They decided as a team to move on from Rodgers. They apparently decided to move on from Crosby. Why not make the move and move on from Barry. Now some of what LaFleur said about Barry was true. He made some changes later in the season and it worked better. But I just don't get that if the franchise is going to reset itself, why they don't change the DC as well.

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

Plan for Love -
They have a plan. The plan is to get Love as many live reps as possible. To build as much starting reps with his fellow starters as possible. BUT its also about getting whoever is going to be his main backup as many reps as possible. They will most likely be breaking in a new backup and will need to get him as many reps as possible as well. Whether it ends up being a veteran or rookie.

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

The Law Firm of Watson and Doubs -
This is going to be a tremendous duo. Doubs was one of the top rookie WR's until he got hurt. He was becoming our number 1 WR until he got hurt in Detroit. Even the first play of that game went to him for a big gain. I'm excited for the future of these 2 guys. That being said they have to continue to develop and they have to find more guys to go with these guys. Toure and Melton are intriguing. They could perhaps be the hidden gem type. But either way, they have to continue to add top tier talent around Love. He will need as much help as he can get starting for the first time.

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

Rasuuuuuuuulllll -
I like Douglas at outside CB. I don't' get why they ever tried experimenting with him in the slot. So the question is about Stokes. What about if they put Alexander in the slot? He is more then capable of doing it. I don't believe Stokes is a slot CB . And we will have to see how Stokes comes back from his injury. It sounds like they are planning to have Nixon do some slot work as well.

I'm not going to talk about Aaron Rodgers...

Nixon/Savage -

OT Class -
Last year in the draft they drafted Rhyan who was a T, Tom who had played T, and Rasheed Walker who was a T. Then they picked up Tenuta who was a 6th round pick, and they got Caleb Jones as an UDFA. They brought in 5 guys that can play OT. Call me crazy but I'm not concerned about our OT position with Bakhtiari back. We will see if Yosh comes back (I believe he will be back). So with that being said, I'm happy they went OT happy last year.

Who do you believe more - Aaron Rodgers or Brian Gutekunst?
More? that is a good question. I believe they each are telling their own versions of the truth. And the real truth is in between somewhere. The comment that I am hung up on from Gutey was "they couldn't get a hold of him and they had to make a decision". I compare that to Rodgers comments of "I came out of the darkness and something changed". Gutey can easily say that they tried calling him and he wouldn't return the calls. But perhaps it was when he was in the darkness where he didn't have his phone and whatnot. So he is telling the truth, but not telling the whole truth kind of thing.

Regardless, they need to get the deal done and move on. Give us both 2nd round picks this year, and a conditional pick next year. I will throw back a 2025 3rd round pick if Rodgers doesn't come back next year or if they don't win the super bowl this year.

13 points
13
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:27 am

Good post, RC.
You forgot to include my switching picks 13 and 15 in the deal. :-D Two 2s and a conditional is the answer.
I like your other addition, I'd also be willing to throw in a 3 if Rodgers only plays one year.

2 points
2
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:21 am

Thanks.

Yeah I thought about that. I would be all for it if they could get it as a part of the deal.

If reports are true it could possibly be we get a 2nd this year and a 2nd next year that could turn into a first depending on what the Jets do. I am "ok" with that, but I'd prefer the 2- 2's this year.

2 points
2
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:15 am

I'd also like a player (receiver) included in the trade.

1 points
2
1
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:19 am

I imagine they have a Plan to secure a veteran backup QB to cover the risk of a Love injury.

2 points
3
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:28 am

I think it would help to have a veteran for someone that Love could lean onto if needed. A mentor. I just think that Matt Ryan would be a perfect player for it. He is at the end of his career. He has played with LaFleur and has tons of experience. He could be a perfect guy in that role. But who knows if he would want to go into a place that he knows he wouldn't be the starter.

I wouldn't be surprised though if they drafted a guy to possible be the backup/development guy. Maybe bring in a lower tiered backup as well. When Rodgers took over in 2008, they drafted 2 QB's that year. I woudln't be surprised if they did something similar.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:43 am

The free agent cupboard is pretty picked over Keenum went to Buffalo. Maybe he will consult withTed's ghost? Ryan ? I would go with a mobile QB from this draft. I like Max Duggan as a winner and he was the guy chucking the ball to Johnston and Davis @ TCU. Jake Haener is a competitor. Hendon Hooker has the arm and movement skills.
A QB at cut-downs, or trade may transpire.

2 points
3
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:22 am

Yeah it is. But there are some guys that are still available that would be good pick ups.

If they are looking earlier in the draft. I think Hooker might be the option. Maybe they look at McKee from Standford as another option.

I could also see a cut down QB or something. Maybe someone post draft.

I think it would be wise to find someone in the draft and develop them. Look at Purdy last year. You never know where you can find a guy that can play well.

2 points
2
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:03 am

I think they’ll draft a QB, but it would be problematic to take one high, even though it might be a good idea. I’m a believer in having a young QB with potential on the roster. The coaches can prepare Love, and it’s not like he hasn’t had three years to learn behind a Hall of Fame QB…

3 points
3
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:24 am

I think they will draft one too.

I think if they drafted one from round 3 down, it would be ok. i don't see them using a first or 2nd round pick on one. Unless they had 3 2nd round picks, then maybe if a guy fell down, they would consider it.

I think it would be wise drafting a guy though. They need someone else to develop.

-1 points
0
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 05:31 pm

I think they will pick up a project if they find one with true upside. Not a terrific draft but there are a few late/UDFAs with clear technical issues but good physical attributes.

0 points
1
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:06 am

You can be sure one QB will be drafted. Depending on the Jets trade compensation even with all the needs on the team I could conceivably see a QB drafted higher than many of us might be thinking. The team is going young, so let draft a young talented QB who can grow along with the rest of the team. Personally, I don't see benefit of over paying for some washed up veteran QB. Why? Might we win an extra game or two if JL is injured? Big deal...its not worth it! Save the money & go for youth building the team the right way for the long term! What's the worst (bitter/sweet) thing that could happen? Higher draft picks in 2024 along with a game day experienced #2 QB?

I am a Jordan Love fan but getting tired of people babying him & pampering him. This is year 4! Yes, I'm guessing 3 or 4 games are needed to get his feet wet, and to get rid of some anxieties, but he will be fine. He doesn't need some washed up old guy to mentor him. That is why they have a full-time QB coach.

1 points
2
1
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:26 am

Also, if they get a vet, there's a leadership question raised and second guessing. If you get a rookie for Love to mentor, it builds his confidence and requires his leadership.

1 points
2
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:38 pm

Bingo T7!

As someone else on here says so well....you get the cookies!

1 points
2
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:27 am

Yeah I just mentioned that if they had 3 2nd round picks they maybe would use one on a QB. If it was a guy that fell I could see them doing it.

I wouldn't overpay them either. Maybe they would do a deal that they would earn the minimum, but get a significant bonus if they start or do whatever throughout the year.

Sometimes veteran QB's can help young QB's. Not always, but sometimes they can. I'm not saying they will sign a guy, but I could see them doing it. I am guessing it will be post draft if they would though. I think they will look for a guy in the draft.

0 points
1
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 03:26 pm

RC,
Based on everything I have gleaned from ML he will want the safety net of a veteran QB. Sometimes he is too risk adverse for me & It is trait about him I do not like. However, I personally see virtually no real value of a veteran QB as they will take up too much cap space, and depending on who that QB is there MAY be behaviors you do not want them imparting on a young QB. No one, ever seems to think about it in this way but it could become a negative issue. Draft a quality young guy and develop him. If Love is injured we may have a back-up QB with experience, and our draft choices may improve next year.

1 points
2
1
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 30, 2023 at 06:49 am

LaFleur can want all he wants to. He'll get at most a guy under $2M.

3 points
3
0
stockholder's picture

March 30, 2023 at 07:06 am

I say trade for one
WHEN YOU NEED ONE.
Otherwise I'm sure a bargain in the draft
will be just as good.
It almost worked for SF.

2 points
3
1
CheesePuff's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:07 am

Speaking of "continuity", I think Packer fans can expect a lot of continuity going forward - in the front office , the quality of the coaching staff, and performance on the field (not to mention full attendance at games regardless of the team's record). Bad mouth them all you want, but the main reason for the Packers' playoff relevance during the last 25+ years has been 2 HOF quarterbacks. Looking forward to the days when any Packer win is reason to celebrate. GPG!!!

1 points
3
2
Packer_Fan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:25 am

All these stories coming out just shows how dysfunctional the Packers were last year.

No OTA for Rodgers to link with the new WR's. Rodgers kind of doing his own thing. We will never know all the things that happened. But we sensed the disconnect.

But it also happened on the defense. Gray and Barry weren't on the same page. And it showed during the mid season slump.

The best I expect out of the season is 500 ball. What I want to see is how Lafleur's offense works. And then see if the defense can be more aggressive. Important factors for 2024 and beyond.

5 points
6
1
Slim11's picture

April 03, 2023 at 12:22 pm

I was excoriated on other sites for bringing up Rodgers' absence from the voluntary OTAs being a factor in the "trust" issue with his new WRs.

Gray's departure combined with Barry's retention does not bode well for what appears to be a very talented defense. I hope Bisaccia's promotion to assistant HC allows him to take on Barry directly .

0 points
0
0
PatrickGB's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:31 am

“It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future'” Yogi Berra.

6 points
7
1
LeotisHarris's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:34 am

FiveThirtyEight is reporting Gutekunst has a 86% chance of winning Al's CHTV poll.

MSNBC called the poll for Gute at 8:04 Eastern.

Fox News is reporting the race is too close to call.

Newsweek says you won't believe what Devante Adams said about...

7 points
9
2
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:42 am

Newsmax reported fraud and ballot harvesting.

2 points
7
5
BirdDogUni's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:04 am

So, status quo...

-2 points
3
5
Swisch's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:39 am

Newsmax, while flawed, is better than most.
If the establishment media has people believing it's racist to show a valid ID before voting, and that it's just fine to have a few people turning in the ballots for many other people, then we might as well just go with the kind of poll above for Rodgers/Gute as being appropriate for our presidential election.
Maybe we can go with the same voting system as that for American Idol.

-7 points
3
10
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:07 am

I was just trying to add some levity. I wouldn't dare show any of my conservative leanings here. This is my place to get away from all of that.

3 points
3
0
Swisch's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:26 am

We can just consider each other independents in the pursuit of common sense, while respecting each other in our differences.
***
It all hits home to sports with Atlanta losing an MLB all-star game to supposed racism, while previously Charlotte lost an NBA all-star game due to the issue of open bathrooms supposedly being enlightened and necessary.
In the past, Roger Goodell wouldn't allow Peyton Manning to wear black high-tops to honor Johnny Unitas, but now pushes on fans messages during games that basically label us a bunch of racists.
I agree we should mostly avoid such controversial topics here at CHTV, but to some extent the controversial topics are pushed in our faces even as football fans.
***
Please excuse me, T7Steve, for any inappropriateness on my part.

-5 points
1
6
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:02 pm

If you speak russian.

1 points
3
2
Leatherhead's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:37 pm

Newsmax is just like all the rest. They tell you what they want to tell you, they don't tell you what they don't want to tell you. This is newsentertainment, and it doesn't matter if it's right, or true, or fair, it only matters if it sells.

Of course they want you to think like them. Otherwise you wouldn't watch.

4 points
6
2
Swisch's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:41 pm

In an imperfect world, we have to do the best we can with what we have available, including how we get our news.
We can think independently while listening to any news source -- even if it's only natural that we'll gravitate to places we trust in relation to our own views -- taking what is good and true, while leaving the rest behind.
It seems the news these days is like American Pickers: most of it junk; some of it nasty in its degradation; but if we look hard enough, containing a few items of valuable reporting.
In any case, I pray that we'll all find some things in common as Americans that we'll all be able appreciate and cherish for our mutual benefit as a country.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XS3YBV1/ref=ox_sc_saved_image_1?smi...

-1 points
2
3
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 03:04 pm

Isn't that what football and CHTV is doing? No matter what we believe we can all get along by disagreeing about the Packers and still feel good about it.

1 points
2
1
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 03:04 pm

Too more.

0 points
0
0
Swisch's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:57 am

ESPN is saying that the poll is systemically racist.

-5 points
2
7
PackEyedOptimist's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:35 am

My take on Rasul at CB instead of safety is that they are almost certain to not take a CB with the first round pick. I thought that was a possibility until now. HOWEVER, they COULD take a CB with the idea of turning him into a S, several of the top guys have the size to do that.

I still think Gute will use #15 to take a DL or an EDGE he's become enamored with. He follows the "only so many big guys" mantra. Our current OL roster vs what's available in this draft says "defense."

Me? I'd still take offense at 15, probably, but Keion White has crawled into my "dark horse crush" territory.

3 points
3
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:36 pm

I am trying to remind myself that if GB’s first round choice turns out to be GREAT, I don’t care what position he plays.
This is an old example, but it is such a good one:
Michael Jordan was picked THIRD. Olajuwon went first, terrific big man, but Portland, picking second, passed on Jordan because they “didn’t need a guard”. Ouch. (Yes, I know, Clyde the Glide, but tell me what they’d do if they had a do-over.)
Who doesn’t NEED Michael Jordan?
So, as much as we have our ideas about what GB should do, and which players we really like, just sit back. And get your 🍿 ready.

2 points
2
0
splitpea1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:22 pm

On a related note, the draft picks don't have to check every athletic box to be great. In 2007, Portland drafted Greg Oden, who did check all those boxes--but had an extremely injury-riddle career that only lasted a few years.

Meanwhile, Seattle took Kevin Durant, who lagged behind Oden in several athletic tests, including the bench press--and look at the player he turned out to be.

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:31 pm

Yes! That whole basketball thing has to be taken into consideration for sure!
Just like there’s more to football than RAS.

One football skill that can’t be overvalued is for defensive players is to be excellent tacklers. Gotta figure with the limitations put in place with the current CBA, that tackling would be very hard to improve in practice because, well, they can’t really tackle all that much. I also think there’s a better than average chance that NFL players are, by and large, more difficult to tackle than college players. (Unless they play in the SEC.)

3 points
3
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:56 am

MLF says Douglas is best suited to play outside so he will be a CB. OK. Is that a talking point from Barry or from MLF's evaluation of DB talent? IDK.

A few weeks ago, Gutey said they would like to look at Douglas at S due to his skill set: awareness, smarts, ability to diagnose, anticipate and tackle. At the time I was thinking "sounds like Sir Charles Woodson".

Also thought what Gutey stated would help form his draft strategy in a draft class weak on S, much better at CB.

Do MLF and Gutey talk to each other about strategy and tactics or is Murphy the filter? Seems like a disconnect to me.

2 points
3
1
jurp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:25 am

They may talk, but since Scooter doesn't report to Gutekunst he doesn't technically have to listen to him. The top of our FO is, frankly, a clusterfuck thanks to Murphy's idiotic org structure.

1 points
4
3
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:42 am

Amari, Deguara, Douglas as a S …. Press corners in soft of coverage … fish or fowl? This structure is creaking at the seams.

3 points
5
2
Bitternotsour's picture

March 29, 2023 at 05:45 pm

Hey. Don't blame Murphy, like a good safety he saw a floater and picked it off. Now he's the owner of a multibillion dollar non-profit.

Opportunity knocked, Murphy grabbed the brass ring. He didn't dare pull that shit with Thompson in the GM chair.

2 points
2
0
Jordan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 03:01 pm

A GM will say things in the media that are designed to not show their cards. There’s always stuff going on behind the scenes with personnel. A GM has the job of making all their players seem valuable and flexible to the other 31 teams especially when they are trying to trade them. Leverage is really important.

The Packers don’t exactly have great trade leverage with Rasul’s $7.7 million dead cap hit.

My opinion is they are **trying** to trade Rasul Douglas and the Packers will draft 2 corners in draft.

0 points
1
1
pantz_bURp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:55 am

I believe, I believe, I believe...I am falling in Love!

*Where is my "I Voted" sticker?

We got this!!! Woody, meet Brian "the Pileated Woodpecker" Gutekunst.

2 points
3
1
Packerpasty's picture

March 29, 2023 at 09:57 am

Twitter didn't like MLF's comments on Love..."pump the brakes, lower our expectations?" " he's been here four years working with a future HOF'er" got rid of pain in the ass Rodgers handed the keys to Love, now we have to "pump the brakes"....we'll see how that goes this season, especially with home games and full stands....hope the boo birds are patient..

2 points
5
3
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:41 am

I think he's building in an excuse for himself. It's not about Love. It's about his system.

1 points
4
3
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:47 am

I don’t expect Love to have a smooth first year. I’m hoping for growth. Rodgers and Favre had plenty of growth pains in their first year starting. However, it’s also in LaFleur’s interest to play down expectations as those are not just on Love but him. Let’s see how the draft goes and what holes remain, but I’m not in the group expecting a vast amount this year, but hoping we build the next one.

As for Rodgers, if he plays, good luck to him, but enjoy it because it may not be a long encore and he would have had a lot less ready to work with here. Time to let go and let football highlight some home truths.

3 points
4
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:11 am

Yes, at first it looks to me as already prepared excuses for fail.

But when you understand the crowd pulse I can understand why he had to say it. There is a part of fan base (I'm the part of it) that believe Jordan Love will be very good from the beggining. I know that I will have patience to wait, but many of that part might not be so. And, then there is the part of the fan base that believe Jordan Love is THE bust (like stockholder, btw) and that message was sent to them, not to be nagging towards Love. And there is part of fan base that really did not need that message. That part knows Jordan Love needs to get some time to be adapted that he is NFL starter ast NFL QB job.

0 points
1
1
Oppy's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:49 pm

You know what MLF's comments really mean?

It means first year starting QBs are exactly that- first year starting QBs.

It means that there's no substitute for playing time in the development of QB, and that experience is the best teacher.

Which leads us to the axiom, "Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want."

MLF's comments are simple and at face value. Love will be a first-year starter at QB in the NFL. He is going to make mistakes. Nothing more, nothing less.

3 points
4
1
TKWorldWide's picture

March 30, 2023 at 12:29 pm

Nailed it!

If GB wins 7 or more games, Love shows encouraging signs, and the cap gets back to manageable, I’d take it for 2023.

2024, on the other hand…

1 points
1
0
Swisch's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:13 am

Even I have fatigue when it comes to talking about our former quarterback (I hope), and only wish him well going forward.
I am excited about Jordan Love, plus Watson and Doubs, and maybe Washington drafted at TE, as well as anyone such as Toure and Melton who may step up.
***
This is a pivotal year for coaches LaFleur and Barry. While Love gets some leeway for inexperience in his first full year as a starter -- and I still think he'll do a lot of good to establish himself as our quarterback of the future -- LaFleur and Barry have enough experience to be at the top of their games in showing us what type of coaches they are.
***
I like an enthusiastic and aggressive and creative Packers team -- with good discipline, too -- to contend for the playoffs this upcoming season of 2023 with a 9-8 record or better.
Again, the coaches are the key. Mistakes will be made with a lot of youth on the field, but the coaches have to instill in our players the poise and smarts and tenacity to overcome them most of the time for wins.
It could be a lot of fun!

3 points
5
2
Tundraboy's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:19 am

I think I'm going to retreat into darkness for a week or so.

4 points
5
1
LeotisHarris's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:53 am

Solid plan. ::fistbump::

3 points
4
1
Swisch's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:55 am

Please reconsider, Tundraboy, always follow the light.
It's not a bad idea, though, to turn off the electronics from time to time.

0 points
2
2
Tundraboy's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:31 pm

I'll try!! Lol

1 points
1
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:31 pm

Still trying,but having nightmares over Barry and MLF returning. Yuck.

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 29, 2023 at 08:39 pm

I do about 8 hours each night.
Works for me.

3 points
3
0
Irish_Cheesehead's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:55 am

Why would we want to discuss the Jets QB? GO PACK!

8 points
9
1
Duneslick's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:06 am

Notice how murphy is conditioning the fans to expecting less for Rodgers ina trade. Now a first round pick is not expected and they are preparing us for Gute caving in on the trade

5 points
6
1
golfpacker1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:15 am

No to moving CB to a big need and drafting one at #15. If Douglas is staying @ CB then drafting one moves down the list. We are not close talent wise to think we are a draft best player available team at this point. Draft best player at position we need most.

Tarvarius Moore is a wildcard. If he ends up a starter and we draft another good safety, we get better quick. Battle?

Could Jim Leonhard still be in mix for DC next year or will he be a college head coach for more $$$?

Someone mentioned Jake Witt-OT sleeper for late round developmental OL.

0 points
1
1
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:12 pm

The top CBs in this draft are Better than Douglas.

1 points
2
1
golfpacker1's picture

March 30, 2023 at 09:54 am

The top 10 TEs in the draft are better than what we have because we have nothing on the roster now. We have 3 BIG needs this year, TE, Safety, and Edge. We don't need to waste a pick at a position of need on a position of strength. CB is a 4th round or later pick. Green Bay is a long way from being a BPA team at this point.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:22 am

Given how many people are vocal on Gutekunst (in a negative way), it's interesting to see that as I write this the vote tally on who is telling the truth is:
Gute 55
AR 05

The poll doesn't address past times, when Gute may not have been as communicative to players the team is moving on from, as he might have been......................but on the issue we voted on, the result shows with absolute clarity what the people that frequent this site think.

4 points
5
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:31 am

The poll also doesn't include if there are biases involved. This website is very biased against Rodgers. As an experiment a few weeks back I posted 2 things. I simply posted "Aaron Rodgers". And the next post was "Go Pack Go".

I will let you guess which one had the most likes and which one had the most dislikes.

0 points
3
3
jannes bjornson's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:18 pm

Vox Populi, Outsiders Lament:
alwaysfindaway says:
March 28, 2023 at 1:55 am
Look at how silly GB mgt looks…big talk from Murph at the girls high school tourney like Rodgers is a distant memory. Big Murph wasn’t going to take any crap from a punk QB or the Jets, only to get criticized by everyone in football as handling it like an impetuous jerk. So Gutey gets the handoff to come back and blame Rodgers. How’s their draft looked the last few years? Why are they gutting the roster exactly if Love is looking so great? Rodgers may be too far down the goofy path to win a SB anymore anyway, and i expect that the Jets will regret this, but GB mgt has shown how inept they are and why Rodgers never got a legit roster to compete with. Can’t wait for the Murphy era to pass

1 points
3
2
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:32 pm

Bias and a difference of opinion are very different things.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:47 am

Yeah, Turophile. I think more of Gutekunst than most, apparently. To me he is a brilliant evaluator of talent, and a tireless worker to improve the Green Bay Packers at every turn. He and his own Personnel Departments are exemplary, in my eyes.

He's had his misses like all GMs do, but, I think he hits pretty well, and shows a good vision for improving the talent across the board.

Seems to me Gutekunst is in between a rock & a hard place, waiting patiently, extremely patiently until he's possibly put in charge of Football Operations as GM, like Ted Thompson was, and Ron Wolf before him under Bob Harlan's exemplary leadership.

I'd love to know who he would select as our next HC, should the need arise. I hope he gets that chance to make the call if the situation presents. I trust him implicitly.

Any word smithing to the media with the AR trade in process is said out of pure professional necessity.

3 points
6
3
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 29, 2023 at 02:52 pm

I am 100% a supporter of Gutey as well! Came into the job in less than desirable circumstances and has done a fantastic job. The Packers seem to be very fortunate to have him. I expect him only to continue to get better with each passing year, and like you wonder when Murphy is gone whether he steps full-time in the VP of Football Operations position.

0 points
3
3
NorCalPacker685's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:36 am

The defense is just going to have to underperform for yet another season for anything to happen... The thought process of keeping a below average DC, who led the team to a below average defensive ranking, just because of continuity is a very scary thought. But if it ultimately leads to change, I guess I'll take it. Because this is a year of finding out what this team needs to become a true contender again.

2 points
4
2
dobber's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:45 pm

"The defense is just going to have to underperform for yet another season for anything to happen"

What this tells you more than anything else is that there's no downward pressure on LaF, yet. When HC's start to feel the heat from above, they start shedding and replacing assistants or reassigning playcalling responsibilities. I'd like to see LaF give over the playcalling.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:01 pm

To whom would you have LaFleur give the play calling? What then would LaFleur actually be doing?

I agree on the downward pressure. I think it’s going to take it being as bloody obvious as the contract calamity became. I think it’s equally plausible that this just exploded in LaFleur and Murphy’s face now they’ve refused to utilize pressure valves.

-2 points
0
2
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:23 pm

Those were my first thoughts too.

I’m a bit torn, waiting for the book to come out to know what the hell happened to LaFleur. ???

As a fan, I’d like to give him a chance to right this ship without Darkness McDramapants sucking all the air out of the stadium.

He made poor choices, but they were made under duress. I’m comfortable seeing what he does with 100% of his focus on making Jordan Love and this Offense the best it can be.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 30, 2023 at 07:53 am

At one point he had Clements, Hackett, and Getsy. Now? Darned if I know. Anyone up for Stenovich calling plays? I am not.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

March 30, 2023 at 07:56 am

Lolz. Me either!!!

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

March 30, 2023 at 10:57 pm

Tom Clements? Connor Lewis? Adam Stenavich?

Be nice if we had a HC who actually was a HC.

0 points
0
0
jurp's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:46 pm

I suspect that the defense won't have to work at under-performing with Barry in charge.

-2 points
0
2
splitpea1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:41 am

Bringing Barry back: MLF seems to be one of those HCs that is loyal to a fault with similar behavior regarding Drayton. Probably wishful thinking on my part, but if the defense gets off to a slow start and Barry continues to do things that don't make sense (and we end up losing because of it), then the temperature on both their seats should be rising to "high".

Rasul: Maybe everyone but me said he will be moved....As far as Stokes goes, there's a nice breakdown of the situation from an Andy Herman podcast. The gist of it is that he is best suited as the #3 CB to be used on obvious passing downs because he is not physical enough in the run, needs to be a better tackler, and needs to work more on his technique instead of relying on his speed to cover everything....and that Douglas is simply better at these things and should be the #2 boundary corner. Despite his solid rookie season, injury notwithstanding, it seems Stokes has quite a ways to go to become a complete CB.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:37 pm

OOOO! Thanks for that update on Stokes. I had been wondering. He was my favorite CB in that draft. Loved his play as a rookie. I think some injury dings caught up to him throughout his Year 2 until the season ending knee & ankle v. DET.

You & I were both in agreement on Suuul staying where he was. Those position changes away from a player's natural skillset seems to rarely be successful.

There's a lot of negative stuff flying around on MLF and Barry. I think this is their last shot to make it work. The on field real time decision making by MLF has left much to be desired, and having AR tire tracks across his back is no way to lead.

Barry was a tough sell two years ago... still, no buyers!

0 points
3
3
golfpacker1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 11:51 am

Love had a veteran to learn from in Rodgers, but I can't imagine Rodgers was too keen on "teaching" his replacement.

Trade Savage, save $8 million we can actually use to buy FA safety who can actually tackle.

Even If we aren't getting #13, and I don't think we will, we are better off financially to get both of their 2nds. Then trade back with #43 to later in 2nd round for an extra 3rd. Its better than if we got #13. Someone always wants to trade back up for a player they covet.

Sean Rhyan is not a bust. He was the 7th rated OT on PFN board and best run blocker in draft. Rasheed Walker was #14.

How much could Matt Ryan cost? Or what about Mason Rudolph for minimum as backup? He has arm talent and big stats at Oklahoma state.

No CBs early but I do like Darius Rush-South Carolina, 6'2 4.35 40, Mekhi Garner-LSU-6'2 215lbs-could be a Safety, Riley Moss-Iowa, and sleeper Starling Thomas-UAB-6'0 and 4.25 40. Wow!

Denzel Mims back from Jets. Perfect Packers WR, 6'3 215lbs, 4.3 40. Has experience & cheap @ just over $1 million.

0 points
3
3
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:13 pm

Hey golf!

I think Savage's nearly $8M cap figure is one of two of our higher deals left to rework if need be to stay under the cap while signing all of our yet unknown draft picks. The other player who could help is Rashan Gary.

If I understand correctly, we'll be able to slide under the cap, sideways with smiles on our faces, with all our picks signed with the help of these remaining players plus workout bonus conversions in a Draft Day trade scenario of AR.

Keeping Savage might be to our fiscal benefit, while trading him may be cost prohibitive. That's the gist I got from TGR's recent piece, and I'm probably wrong! again. Yay! lol

0 points
1
1
golfpacker1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:06 pm

Keep the politics out of here boys. We have enough to argue about without starting that shit on here. If we don't have a bunch of injuries, we could surprise some teams and pundits. But 7 wins would not be terrible if Love plays well and answers the questions, we have about him. Plus the other young guys make strides. We are probably picking around #10 in 2024 and have the Jets 2nd rounder. If we had a great draft in 2023 to fill the holes with talent. We get younger, better, and out of salary cap hell. We could be surprisingly decent in 2024 with another good draft coming. Maybe the biggest and most refreshing thing will be not having to deal with or talk about the Diva anymore.

3 points
4
1
greengold's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:20 pm

Agree with -almost - all of it.

7 Wins?

I think we're going to be far more competitive this season, and we'll challenge for the Division. Been confident in Love carrying that QB1 Badge to greatness for a while now. Seems eager as hell to make the most of this opportunity as well, organizing the private workout in California with the boys.

Good!

Everything else is very well said. Necessary too.

-1 points
2
3
golfpacker1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:20 pm

Some know it all "insider" is reporting Jets/Packers trade being held up because the Jets wanting compensation in case Rodgers only plays a year. Is it too complicated to think the Jets can't get a commitment from Rodgers that he will play 3 years? They could resign him to a new contract that stipulates that. That shouldn't be the Packers responsibility. The Jets are getting a 4-time NFL MVP. How often does that happen? Rodgers could easily play 3-4 years and at a high level. He is motivated to do so because he feels disrespected by Packers wanting to move on. The Jets getting compensation or assurance that Rodgers plays long enough is between them and Rodgers. Get it done already.

3 points
3
0
T7Steve's picture

March 29, 2023 at 01:02 pm

Yes. I was wondering why the Packers should be held up "post Rodgers" too. Cap hit is bad enough.

The Jets haven't had the chance learn how it feels to wonder every year.

Tampa just learned, and in a couple years the Chiefs will be lucky to be starting to worry.

Not too many teams have had this problem (Bears?)

0 points
1
1
Lphill's picture

March 29, 2023 at 12:49 pm

Joe Barry was a decent linebackers coach but it ends there.

3 points
3
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 29, 2023 at 03:10 pm

Green, I think we could be better than 7 wins too. But I don't think it's as important if we squeak into the playoff as the Packers made it seem this year. Look what that got us, we missed out on a top ten pick, and we still really don't know any more about Love. I am optimistic that Love is going to turn into at least a good NFL QB. With a good chance of being really good. This year I would be happy with at least being competitive in every game with a chance to win. If we add the right pieces in the draft and get a few players back from the Jets, barring injuries we could see 10 wins.If we draft 2 or 3 good TEs and a real WR2, 1 or 2 good Edge rushers and a top Safety would go a long way to being better than last year.

Do you have some insight when you said 3 OL would be included in the trade? What would that do for our cap woes, and can the Jets afford to take on that much $$?

Also who do you think will come back from the Jets. I am hoping for at least Ruckert and Mims. But I wouldn't turn down Ashtyn Davis as well.

-2 points
0
2
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 29, 2023 at 04:43 pm

I always look forward to CoaPM - although to be part of the initial barrage of comments one must be ready to go at sunrise - which my lifestyle does not allow. I'm also wondering how many dairy farmers are there on this site? Still there is an upside for me - as many of my thoughts and opinions have been adroitly covered by others. So that only leaves me with a minimal effort to expend - such as:

* anytime I see an MLF interview - I skip it. Always a serving of cliches, platitudes and banal comments.
* of course MLF has a plan for Love and company. What is the alternative? The reality is that most people change because they have to - not want to.
* It appears to be an underwhelming OT class. Still we know that there will be some hidden gems - which Gutekunst is perfectly capable of finding.
* of course I will comment on Gutekunst ghosting Rodgers. Simply, karma at work.

2 points
3
1
EnemyTerritory's picture

March 29, 2023 at 06:31 pm

Best player available please. The GBP have a dearth of offensive talent. The WR and TE rooms are dang near barren. Keeping Douglas for one year suggests a two yeAr plan with Rasul as a stopgap. There will be cap cuts and signings 6/1. That which we do not discuss will as I’ve said numerous times occur 6/1. Daresay the GM makes a trade or two picks for players…. Of course Barry will bury the hopes and dreams of the faithful.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:08 pm

What poll?

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

March 29, 2023 at 10:58 pm

The real MLF offense?

1 points
1
0
StarrtoRodgers's picture

March 30, 2023 at 05:55 am

Jets GM Joe Douglas drafted Zach Wilson 2nd overall in the 2021 draft & watched the Jets trade for & draft QB Sam Darnold 3rd overall in 2018. Douglas then traded Sam Darnold, & benched Wilson, after Douglas had given up on the two 23 year olds after 38 starts for Darnold and 22 for Wilson.

The Jets were originally so high on Darnold that they traded 4 high picks to get Darnold - their 6th overall pick in 2018, 2018 37th overall pick, 2018 49th overall pick and their 2019 2nd round pick (which would be 34th overall).

Given that the Packers think so highly of Jordan Love that they are willing to give way the QB that won the passer rating title over 31 other starting QBs 2 of the last 3 years and is a 4 time MVP, wouldn't the Jets think the same & drop the idea of Aaron as their QB in an instant & jump at a Packer offer of young 24 yr old Jordan Love?

With Jordan so highly thought of, would the Jets give the Packers a Russell Wilson like package in return?:

Russell Wilson was traded for 7 players - the 9th (2022), 5th (2023), 40th (2022), 37th (2023) picks in the NFL Draft - all unconditional draft picks - & a young solid starting tight end (Noah Fant, the 20th pick in the 2019 draft) & a starting defensive end (Shelby Harris) & quarterback Drew Lock (2nd round 42nd overall pick in the 2019 draft - 6 players who will be Seattle starters and 2 of which (5th and 9th pick) will probably be all pros and a backup or possible starting QB in young Lock.

If no, why not?

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 30, 2023 at 10:28 am

"As a fan, I’d like to give him a chance to right this ship without Darkness McDramapants sucking all the air out of the stadium." Green Gold that is the name of the year for Rodgers. Congrats!

Starr I would take 50% of that at this point. I do think Rodgers is worth that especially if the Jets can get a 3 year commitment from Rodgers, which by the way is their problem not ours. It is mind boggling to revisit what we lost out on by passing on that deal and adding in the battleship anchor of a team crippling contract they gave Rodgers on top of it. Think where we would be now with the players we would have got from the picks, the additional players in the trade, the extra picks this year, Rodgers gone and no cap killing contract that won't even let us sign a minimum free agent. That's on someone's resume forever as one of the biggest trade mistakes ever in NFL history.

Green Bay can get some of it back this year in the Rodgers trade if we get good compensation back. While we deserve a 1st rounder this year and next plus players too, I hope we at least score both of their 2023 2nd rounders, a 2nd next year that turns into a 1st if they make playoffs, and some players. Even though we don't have money to spend on much needed free agents this year, we still have to fill out a roster with the best 53 affordable players. And if that means demanding and taking 3 minimum salary players from the Jets in the deal, we cut 3 other players and fill holes @ Safety, WR, TE with Davis, Ruckert, and Mims. The other way to enhance the rebuild is to trade back for more top 4 round picks.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

March 30, 2023 at 10:36 am

Dont think MLF doesn't know Rich Bisaccia isn't lurking....

1 points
1
0