Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Lovin' the Middle
The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.
By JerseyAl
This one is going to be brief as I just didn't have much time today to think polluted thoughts and write.
Lots of OTA reports floating around,, but I found this particular one very interesting (from Former CHTV writer Paul Bretl, now over at PackersWire.com), "Love has really been attacking the middle of the field during OTAs. The Packers have been running a lot of slants and crossers, and Love has been finding the soft spot in the defense." We saw some of this from Love in his appearance against the Eagles in 2022. It would seem he is more willing to throw to the middle of the field than Aaron Rodgers was. But it wasn't always like that for Rodgers. In fact, look at this tweet from Brandon Carwile (another former CHTV writer):
Aaron Rodgers’ passing depth chart from his first season as a starter (2008).
What will Jordan Love’s look like? pic.twitter.com/6A2v9K2alT
— Brandon Carwile (@PackerScribe) June 5, 2023
Look at that middle square. It's rather astonishing that this could be the same Aaron Rodgers we've known for the last few years. Did experience and the wisdom of age make Rodgers so middle field-averse? And is it as pronounced as we think it is?
Well. luckily enough, our own Dusty Evely tackled that very subject in an article for Packer Report. Dusty examined the final four years of Rodgers' career with the Packers. Dusty writes,
"Over that time, Rodgers has targeted the middle of the field on 38.5% of his attempts (~12.5 attempts per game), completing 77.3% of his passes for 9.0 YPA. That seems good! During that time, the rest of the league has targeted the middle of the field on 46.0% of their attempts (~15.7 per game), completing 74.1% of passes for 8.0 YPA."
Surprised the difference between Rodgers and the rest of the league wasn't greater? I am. Things are not always how they seem. And how about that 77% completion rate? What if he had used the middle of the field more often? The polluted thought are swirling around in my head now...
It's over Mason - It was reported this week that Mason Crosby sold his house in Green Bay. Much as I have expected since the end of last season, the Packers will not be bringing Mason Crosby back (regardless of Brian Gutekunst saying the door was not closed). Crosby was a cap casualty - there was just no way the Packers could fit him in unless he took significantly less money. Crosby wisely declined and will likely just wait and see if another team comes calling when their kicker gets hurt. Or maybe, he will decide to just retire. Crosby has purchased a home in Tennessee, seemingly the new popular place for former Packers to live. Thanks for everything Mason!
Not this year, rookies - Last season, every one of the Packers draft picks made the roster. The odds are against that happening this year. The seventh rounders will be battling a difficult numbers game at the position groups of safety, wide receiver,running back and cornerback. Can all four (Anthony Johnson, Carrington Valentine, Lew Nichols, Grant DuBose) grab the final roster spot at those positions? I could see two, possibly three, but not all four.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther. Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
Comments (155)
NickPerry
June 07, 2023 at 06:23 am
"What if he had used the middle of the field more often? The polluted thought are swirling around in my head now..."
Those polluted thoughts have been swirling in mine for the last several seasons Al and reached a highpoint after that loss in the Divisional Game vs the 49ers 2 years ago. I will forever see Allan Lazard running across the middle, ALONE, wide open, right in front of Rodgers yet he was ignored...Sigh...
Mason Crosby... Wow, I guess there's probably not a shot now Crosby would be back. The dude was money in the playoffs and in one of the most difficult places to kick a football...Green Bay Wisconsin. I wonder what Crosby's stats would have looked like had he kicked in a dome his entire career like those wusses in Minnesota and Detroit? I know, AWESOME!
Thank you Mason Crosby!
I think Anthony Johnson is almost a lock and the same might be said for Nichols if he can out play Patrick Taylor who I had high hopes for actually. I don't know enough about DuBose and nothing about Valentine. I do know many were stoked about DuBose and he was a steal in this years draft.
One thing is certain...The bottom half of this roster is going to be much more talented than it was in recent years. Better and younger!
Guam
June 07, 2023 at 06:50 am
Article in the local Madison paper today was lauding Valentine for his play at CB and stated he had the two best pass breakups of the practice. Preseason hype or reality - I have no idea, but he apparently caught the eye of the reporter and the CB coach.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 06:57 am
Glad to hear that, Guam! A lot to be excited about with this CB. From my draft notes:
Pick #232 CB Carrington Valentine - Kentucky (33rd CB taken. #137 Overall Daniel Jeremiah)
6-0 193 4.44 (72%) 39” vertical (85%) 128” broad (86%)
LENGTH, SPEED, AGGRESSION, TENACIOUS, MIRROR, FLUID, Changes direction on a dime.
INSTINCTS. Very strong in zone coverage. Also +press-man.
Exceptional athlete. Twitchy quick w track star long speed.
Long arms to succeed in press-man coverage, AND heavy, solid zone experience. Reactive, fluid & sticks to WRs.
Sees routes develop and able to run with receivers. +drive mechanics in zone. Eager to jump slant routes. VERY COMPETITIVE. Takes completions personally. Innately driven and DB Coach’s dream. Led Kentucky in PDs with 17.
Works hard in RUN D.
STs >>> Regular on KR coverage, PR coverage and PR teams
Boundary CB in zone heavy scheme with enticing blend of tools/physicality perfect for NFL.
NEGATIVE: allows big plays +20 (8) Also needs consistency tackling in run game. Just needs to polish skills & technique both coverage & v. run.
Long, athletic, aggressive CB yet to reach ceiling as man cover, ball instincts and technique - all underdeveloped. Zone/Press corner projection.
Irish_Cheesehead
June 07, 2023 at 12:34 pm
No Jaire, no Rasul, no Stokes, no Nixon. He's certainly getting his share of opportunities.
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 05:12 pm
Nixon was there
NickPerry
June 08, 2023 at 05:46 am
Hi Guam...I actually saw that after I had posted that later in the morning. Thank you for the heads up though, I always want to hear about other Packers content. It was actually encouraging to read that about Valentine.
NickPerry
June 08, 2023 at 05:46 am
Double post
packerbackerjim
June 07, 2023 at 09:52 am
I have often wondered if Rodgers saw “ghosts” or if he had a blind spot where he couldn’t locate the receiver. Perplexing.
SicSemperTyrannis
June 07, 2023 at 05:51 pm
His field of vision was blocked. A permanent screen in the middle. /s
Actually last season I saw him target Lazard in the middle, which is just the WRONG way to use him IMHO. Put him on the perimeter and put the ball where only he could get it. Let them double cover him, it wouldn't matter. I don't know that this is a viable strategy for JL10 and Christian Watson. Maybe that pinpoint accuracy will develop?
SicSemperTyrannis
June 07, 2023 at 05:45 pm
WR that don't make it onto the roster can still be kept in the PS? I don't know if an obvious worst WR will emerge from the 10, but it's going to be a tight squeeze.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 06:42 am
I love Paul’s & Brandon’s work alike, and this is some welcome reporting. Love is going to have one helluva a lot of opportunities over the middle with all the recently added players. Especially when TE Tucker Kraft returns. This will be fun to watch develop.
LaFleur’s playbook just opened wide, and the middle of the field should be bank for the Packers with teams dedicating Safety help over Watson. Kraft, Musgrave, Reed, Melton, Toure… a lot to like there.
Hats off Mason Crosby, the consummate Pro and All-Time scoring leader in Green Bay. Every one of his 1,918 points scored were greatly appreciated, but more so, the man. Thank you, Mason, for keeping the bar high.
I think the Packers keep 7 WRs this year. Plenty of quality backups should a starter need some time out. Speed guys can get dinged. We’ve now got 3 of them at WR running 4.3 range. Gutekunst kept 7 last season, and likely will again this year.
That clears a healthy (?) DuBose if so, and all 4 players make this team in Valentine, Nichols III, Johnson Jr., and DuBose. Guessing Gary and Stokes hit the PUP to start the season making this easier for Gutekunst to swing.
For those who haven’t seen Grant DuBose play:
https://youtu.be/VCazC0cDUgg
Thanks, Al!
mrtundra
June 07, 2023 at 07:40 am
Thanks for the link to Grant Dubose's highlight videos. I had not heard much about him, before. If this video is any indication of what Gute got, in this draft, Dubose is a keeper! GO PACK GO!!!
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 08:11 am
Thus far the unheralded receiver who has consistently attracted attention with stand out plays is Malik Heath, who is very similar in type to DuBose. Similar height and about 10 pounds heavier. I don’t put much store on catches against guys in shorts and non contact drills, but Heath is a guy to watch.
More generally, the chances are not all 7 will be healthy. I think that if healthy , the locks are WR Watson, Doubs, Reed and Toure and everyone after could be on a PS route. I do not see them keeping 7 unless Nixon is hurt, especially now we have Musgrave likely taking snaps in part as a receiving TE. I could see 4 RBs if Goodson (who has looked good thus far in shorts) and was playing in the slot yesterday, makes the team.
As to the rest, I’ve no idea how the DL will shake out. Slayton could make a push and is Ford for real? I’m going to hold off on anointing the final group there in part because the mix of types still puzzles me.
The odds are against a repeat of all making the opening roster, but that’s good: it’s important that we start to build our pipeline and that includes the PS. I don’t see our later picks being a problem to stash there unless they visibly ball out in camp to a point that gets wider notice, in which case I doubt we try.
The competition is looking like it’s going to be great this summer all over the roster. It looks like Tarvarius Moore is pushing Ford at this point, Goodson is making a case and Brenton Cox early on with Malik Heath and Valentine. Let’s hope they continue once the pads go on and get some company! It’s going to be fun.
On a side note, I was interested to see that Deguara and Pearson have been off in a separate F Back group at times. Practicing lead blocking technique but also the H/F back type of plays we’ve not seen. On both counts I find that an encouraging sign.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 08:54 am
These are all very solid points you bring up, Coldworld.
Heath has impressed early, and DuBose out with a mystery injury doesn't bode well for him to this point. Goodson shouldn't be underestimated, and it will be interesting where the cuts hit hard with so much talent on this roster. Something has to give at another position when we keep an extra WR or RB or Safety for that matter.
I really like Brenton Cox Jr., and I'm hopeful he is able to stick onto this Final 53. He needs further development, but probably makes the roster in a protective move, especially with Gary out recovering. Hoping like crazy they don't force him back in too early, as a healthy Gary returning to this team midseason may bring more benefits, and Cox Jr. provides depth at EDGE in the interim.
Bringing up both Deguara and Pearson is a big consideration as well, depending on the expansion of LaFleur's playbook like we've never seen. None of us can know at this point how run heavy LaFleur plans to go, but roster cuts may provide a good indicator.
Agree there is much to be encouraged about as GB moves closer to the start of this season. A lot of new faces, and in a youth movement, some vets could find themselves on the chopping block.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 09:50 am
Do you think Jonathan Garvin can afford to sit out OTAs? With Gary hurt you'd think he'd be all in? Think he's one of the vets on the bubble? If so where is he?
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 10:41 am
Yeah, Steve.
Garvin probably sees the writing on the wall... That's my guess. Others who I see are very likely feeling the heat: Josh Myers, Royce Newman, Jon Runyan, Jake Hanson, Shemar Jean-Charles, and Darnell Savage.
The raw number of Safeties fighting for roster positions is big. I could very easily see Savage being one of the odd men out here. More big names on that OL as well could be in for the fight of their 53 man roster lives. Apparently they have opened up OL positions for competition. Good.
LambeauPlain
June 07, 2023 at 11:38 am
Garvin may indeed see the writing on the wall...if it was him I'd be at OTAs and working hard to erase that writing.
Staying away is head shaker and kind of underlines that writing on the wall.
Even Bak is taking snaps...too bad Garvin passes on the opportunity.
HawkPacker
June 07, 2023 at 12:37 pm
I wonder if he is injured? I have not heard that but it is surprising that he would not attend as he is borderline making the team.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 01:09 pm
Even if, or especially if, injured you'd think he'd be there. They don't give injury designations for OTAs so it's either show or no show.
Turophile
June 08, 2023 at 03:17 am
Thanks to greengold and Coldworld for the very encouraging comments on WR.
So many seem to have flashed its going to need seeing them in full padded practice (and especially against another team). No sure things, but a whole slew of guys who might be a 4-5-6th option.............
There is serious competition at WR, but it is different at TE, where its Deguara, Kraft (if fit) and Mugrave and not much else. I can't see 4TEs on the roster, so Tyler Davis is going to have to impress to stay.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 11:25 am
He's got the goods, mrtundra! I mean, from the looks of him. Small school stasher on our IR to develop for a year to bring him up to NFL standards? Not a bad plan, if that is what Gutekunst is thinking here.
Grant DuBose really does look the part.
croatpackfan
June 07, 2023 at 08:08 am
GG, DoBoise main negative observation was bunch of drops between highlight plays. I'm keen to believe, with hard work and lot of practice he can improve to the level he may contribute in NFL. If he will be on 53 roster, I assume he will be mostly inactive at the beginning of his career.
He looks like he has a lot of talent, but need to clean a lot.
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 08:29 am
DuBose did not have a catching problem. He had very good hands in fact, including in contested situations. Melton and particularly Wicks and Watts have had issues catching. The questions with DuBose and Heath are timed speed and small school competition.
We tend to overlook undrafted depth, but Cotton (who is fast and also an X type) made the tough catch and got both feet in against the odds that got Clifford praise for a 2 minute drill yesterday. Competition is going to be fierce.
jont
June 07, 2023 at 01:22 pm
DuBose looks good. On a highlight reel. And I read a lot of good things about him.
But small school or not, what I'd like to know is what really made him a 7th rounder and not a 3rd.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 02:32 pm
Sometimes it's the obscurity of being in a small program, or being overlooked entering the recruiting process in high school to begin with.
Grant DuBose started his career at Miles College, a small HBCU in his home state of Alabama. COVID hit and DuBose then bagged groceries at Wal-Mart, AND worked on a line at a car factory.
A friend at Charlotte University played QB there, and DuBose hit the transfer portal. In 2 seasons DuBose caught 126 passes for 1684 yds and 15 TDs for the Charlotte 49ers. Talk about limited Division I experience!
He caught some eyes at the Senior Bowl (accepted invite just a week prior to the game after a roster spot opened due to injury), showing off his length on a TD reception sprawling into the corner of the end zone to snag. Showed great footwork in drills on another TD.
There were only 2 games where he finished with less than 48 yds receiving. He excelled as a blocker as well as a receiver. His size & willingness helped other teammates and that got noticed too.
jont, he doesn't have a lot of breakaway speed, but he does have the traits to be a great possession WR.
He uses his body strength/positioning to box out defenders. Boundary X. Back shoulder fades, jump balls flip 70-30 in his favor. Bulldozer after the catch. His tape, as you might have seen is filled with technical nuances. Stems, cuts to attack leverage. Can sink & snap on hitches. Great spatial awareness near boundaries that is super natural. Doesn't take plays off either.
Needs to learn the NFL route tree. Again, small program. Seems like a good get with the draft's 3rd to last pick.
jont
June 08, 2023 at 12:02 pm
good info
thanks
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 10:52 am
Not sure where you get his drops stats from, but, he played for a very small school, and agree he's probably a candidate for IR protection for a solid year of development.
With 13 picks, after having rostered 11 the year prior, you've got to figure Gutekunst was essentially securing what he felt might be his top UDFA hopeful with one of those late R7 selections - with a long term development plan ahead.
Spock
June 07, 2023 at 08:50 am
Thanks for the link. He looks like he's big and well built with soft hands. If you can catch everything thrown your way you've got a chance to make the team.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 11:21 am
Spock! Grant DuBose, Pick #256 has got some skills, right? I mean, he's from Charlotte University... small small small program. But, one look at him and you can see he belongs in this NFL.
I have to laugh a bit, because Gutekunst finds gems all over the place. He may have told DuBose that he was going to shut him down for full on development to bring him more up to speed this year with a plan to play him later in the season if necessary or next year.
A guy like that, with a solid year dedicated to his development at the NFL level? Reminiscent of Alcorn State's Donald Driver... selected in 1999's 7th Round, Pick# 213. Gutekunst has an eye for WR talent, and oddly, he was Ron Wolf's Scout that year Wolf drafted Driver...
Huh...!?! Hmm!?!
SicSemperTyrannis
June 07, 2023 at 06:01 pm
I hope there's so much talent that MLF has to pull his hair out trying to decide final cuts :)
I haven't heard of an obvious worst option on the 90 man roster yet ...
JerseyAl
June 07, 2023 at 12:37 pm
What I like: Tracks ball in the air, makes contested catches, some YAC ability and works back to the QB in the scramble drill. Huge jump in competition, but tools are there to develop.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Yeah, Al, DuBose has some of those intangibles you look for in an NFL prospect. Size, frame, length, fluidity, etc.
Grant is an exceptional route runner to begin with. That's probably his top trait. That and TOUGHNESS. I love seeing that in a WR most aside from catching ability & routes.
DuBose's other plus trait, as you mentioned is in contested catch wins. DuBose OWNS the ball and rarely dropped a pass from what I've read on him.
He plays bigger than he is (6-2 201) and has those natural ball skills. He's also got plus body fluidity, helping him in his mid-air adjustments and catch point talents. Apparently he was known as a jump ball weapon & zone beater.
As you said, huge jump in competition. Hard to say what is going on with his unknown injury. Just hoping for the best for his quick return to the roster competition, but maybe they just have a plan to hold him back this season to give him more specialized work.
From my notes, I guess he had some STs to him too. 8.4 yds/att on PR, and was a tackle machine in punt coverage.
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 05:30 pm
The guy who showed up as a catcher yesterday is the one we all overlook, Cotton. Small school guy who came out in the midst of Covid and did a solo NFL Covid protocol individual testing. He bounced around and missed all preseason last year hurt, so we didn’t see him and it’s hard to find all that much on him.
Returning from injury, he made I think 3 key catches with one long one and one spectacular end zone grab all off Clifford. Andy Herman said his speed stood out immediately. 6’2”, 206. Cotton recorded his pro-day numbers, then had his agent ship the tape to interested parties. Cotton logged:
4.21 in the short shuttle;
40-yard dash of 4.38 seconds;
36½ inches on the vertical jump;
7.01 seconds in the 3-cone drill;
14 reps on a parking-lot bench press
Started out at a JUCO, then 2 years at Idaho. Led the FCS with 8.8 catches per game in 2019, and was second in yards per game at 114.1. Cotton finished his career with 137 receptions for 1,797 yards and 14 touchdowns, and broke the program record for single-game receptions (18) in his final outing, tallying 230 yards and two scores in a 60-53 win Nov. 23 at Northern Arizona.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 06:21 pm
Yup. Cotton’s another one worth keeping an eye on.
All I know from the info gleaned is Gutekunst appears to have done a nice job adding competition in quantity & quality at WR this off-season. How they got here truly doesn’t matter. Not anymore.
Christian Watson
Romeo Doubs
Samouri Toure
Bo Melton
Jeff Cotton
Jayden Reed
Dontayvion Wicks
Grant DuBose
Malik Heath
Duece Watts
Jadakis Bonds
11 WRs battling it out. A couple of months ago there were questions about how we could have 10 to go to TC with…
SicSemperTyrannis
June 07, 2023 at 06:03 pm
Al, I also noticed the contested catch ability in an extended highlight reel. I was bummed when I read he was a no show at practice. Obviously he's attended now, do you know how many he missed?
PeteK
June 07, 2023 at 04:56 pm
Who's that QB?
SicSemperTyrannis
June 07, 2023 at 05:55 pm
GG, any word on Kraft's injury?
DuBose showing for practice? I read he was a no show, now I read he's been there, but never saw how many he missed or when he arrived.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 06:03 pm
No word on either player’s injuries keeping them out of participating that I have seen. I do think both Kraft & DuBose are there at the OTAs tho.
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 08:04 pm
DuBose has just been injured (withheld from on field activities) but present since rookie mini camp. I don’t think he’s missed being present at any. Kraft was practicing yesterday.
Handsback
June 07, 2023 at 06:43 am
A couple of issues with throwing over the middle. Throwing late over the middle is bad, very bad. Also get fewer defenders on outside routes.
When teams talk about a diverse receiving corp , they aren't talking about race but having players that can cover the field because of their strengths. I think for some time Green Bay has had multiple receivers with the same attributes. Now they have good and fast guys that can stress the middle of the field.
Yeah Rodgers didn't like working the middle when the chips were down, but maybe it was because he didn't have a guy that would stress the middle and make the play an advantage for the offense.
Just MHO
GregC
June 07, 2023 at 06:59 am
I think that if anything, speed is more important on the edges than over the middle. A big part of the reason for Rodgers' aversion to using the middle of the field was a lack of good TEs. There was also Rodgers' aversion to throwing interceptions. You mentioned that throwing late over the middle is bad, and Rodgers liked to hang onto the ball for awhile, which often took the middle of the field out of play.
Rodgers seemed to increasingly like the one-on-one game, which is more straightforward on the edges than it is over the middle. He liked to exploit one-on-one matchups and throw to a WR who was anticipating what Rodgers was going to do. It was a good tactic to use with Davante Adams, but not so good with most of the other guys.
jont
June 07, 2023 at 01:32 pm
This is a good look at it.
When Al wrote "surprised the difference between Rodgers and the rest of the league wasn't greater?" my thought was "not at all, those are 3 catches a game that would've gone to a decent TE or good slot guy, to a Findley or Driver or Cobb, who could get open consistently."
SicSemperTyrannis
June 07, 2023 at 06:08 pm
Hands, I like to think that AR12's combination of arm strength and accuracy opened up both sidelines and lowered risk, but the stats in the article about how often he threw to the middle surprised me.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 07:05 am
Al, I wonder if he can graph throws by quarters or even ends of halves. I was surprised too, when shown how many times he threw in the middle until I thought about it. It seemed to us he didn't throw in the middle, because he never used the middle during crunch time when we'd notice it the most.
I hope they can at least keep all the draft picks on the PS. Pluss, there's always an UDFA that seems to make the 53 too.
HawkPacker
June 07, 2023 at 08:11 am
Hopefully, Cox is the UDFA that makes the team.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 08:34 am
That's who I was thinking of. Thanks.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 08:34 am
again
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 09:06 am
Hopefully the best players in camp make this roster. There are a few lesser known UDFAs/SFAs that I think could be contenders in addition to Cox. One is WR Heath (based on showing in shorts admittedly), but I could see an OL shake things up once pads go on, if we are serious about the run game. My hope is that we keep an open mind to merit earned this year in terms of opportunity through the summer and carry that on to the roster.
CheesedDeadHead
June 07, 2023 at 12:45 pm
"Hopefully the best players in camp make this roster. "
AND get more playing time.
Guam
June 07, 2023 at 07:10 am
I too was surprised that the pass differential for over the middle throws wasn't larger. Dusty looked at the last four years, but I wonder what the trend looked like within those four years. I really wasn't conscious of Rodgers' avoidance of the middle of the field until the last two years, but that may have been more about me not being a good football analyst than any change by Rodgers. Regardless, I still would like to see the Packers use the middle of the field more.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 10:27 am
Dusty Evely, who is a complete boss with this stuff, and the author of the sited article went a bit further in his deep dive into this notion, and this part might be what many of us sensed.
The percentages sited were comprised from ALL QBs.
Evely went a step further and took RPOs behind the line of scrimmage out of the equation, concentrating on the 67 QBs who attempted at least 100 non-RPO passes past the LOS since 2019.
*** Of those 67 QBs, Rodgers ranked 65th at targeting the middle of the field.
Turns out Jimmy Garoppolo led that group of 67 QBs, targeting the middle of the field 58.4% of his attempts. In essence, Garoppolo attempted 14 more passes over the middle per game than did AR.
>>> Compared to most of the league's QBs we saw (67 QBs for 32 teams) throwing over the middle, Rodgers was close to dead last, amongst starters and backups, with just 35% of his passes targeting the middle.
I'll go onto add, the Packers in that span were pretty one dimensional in the middle of the field, and the king of the hill in Targets during the span since LaFleur's hire was Davante Adams, by an insanely wide margin.
YEAR / ADAMS / NEXT WR ON TARGETS LIST
2021 / 169 / 40 (Lazard)
2020 / 149 / 63 (MVS)
2019 / 127 / 52 (Lazard)
Much of that stuff going into the middle of the field was to Adams. Neither of Lazard nor MVS did much work over the middle. Bob Tonyan was 3rd on the Targets list in 2020 with 59. 11 of those were TDs. 9 were + 20.
Based on that, Guam, your eyes weren't deceiving you!!!
SoCalJim
June 07, 2023 at 10:42 am
Awesome post, greengold. My recollection of the past few years was that Rodgers did avoid the middle of the field to a significant extent, and when he did go there, DA was most likely to be his targeted receiver.
I look forward to J Love spreading the ball around a lot more, around all parts of the field and to all of his receivers.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 11:03 am
Thanks, SoCalJim. Something wasn't sitting right and had to do some digging!
Rodgers efficiency was high, but he really didn't target the middle of the field much, based on Dusty Evely's research. Dusty is such a great guy too. A wonderful gentleman. We've had a number of exchanges via email over the years. The guy is a true boss with this stuff.
SoCalJim
June 07, 2023 at 01:52 pm
I’m a big fan of Dusty’s work here on CHTV!
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 02:08 pm
A gem of a human being. So is Andy Herman. Both good people and great contributors here and elsewhere.
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 02:06 pm
Not surprising Garoppolo targets the middle of the field, he can't throw to the outside. By Purdy's 4th game he had attempted more 20 yard passes outside the numbers than Garoppolo had in his last 32 regular season games. It's actually damn impressive that Shanahan could keep getting so many explosive plays with a limited QB. Not sure why teams weren't crowding the middle of the field but I damn sure would be.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 07, 2023 at 03:12 pm
Its not just about Garopolo's throwing ability. That offense is designed to attack the middle of the field.
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 07:12 pm
They also have the YAC weapons to do so, but what I'm saying if you know the QB struggles with longer throws outside the numbers you should be able to get more bodies condensed in the middle. I'm not saying leave the 20 yard out wide open but I'd take a completion there in exchange for forcing him out of his comfort zone.
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 07:12 pm
They also have the YAC weapons to do so, but what I'm saying if you know the QB struggles with longer throws outside the numbers you should be able to get more bodies condensed in the middle. I'm not saying leave the 20 yard out wide open but I'd take a completion there in exchange for forcing him out of his comfort zone.
Guam
June 08, 2023 at 07:40 am
Thanks GG!. Great information and nice to know I wasn't making stuff up..... Appreciate your hard work.
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 11:06 am
Somewhere, in the bowels of 1265 Lombardi, there's a statistician that already knows the percentages on just about everything connected to the Packers. If there were something anomalous , that info would go to Gute and LaFleur.
I don't care which part of the field we use as long as we keep moving the ball downfield and into the endzone. I've always felt it was easier to work the edges, because that takes about half the defense out of the picture, maybe more. A lot of stuff is happening between the hashmarks.
You have to work the middle of the field enough to keep people honest. If 1/3 of your passes that went beyond the line of scrimmage were between the hashmarks, I'd say that's pretty proportional. We were at 38, which is more.
So we should be critical that we're more balanced in that regard than most of the NFL teams? The idea that a very good, very smart, very experienced QB spread the ball around proportionally left-center-right, as opposed to a league of mostly average QBs who throw over the middle more? Am I getting this right?
Truly, we're all bored, but I'm kind of tired of rehashing Rodgers. It's 2023, he's not on the team, we've got a game with the Bears in about 90 days. I think we've got a wonderful chance to start fast for a change and in the process, beat a division opponent on their own field. And it's the Bears. Yes, Yes, and Hell Yes.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 07, 2023 at 11:13 am
It seems the edges are easier because not as clogged with defenders, WR or TE less likely to get knocked unconscious by a hit, less likely to throw a pick. I think Rodgers used the middle of the field when he had guys he trusted there, like Cobb, Adams, a healthy Tonyan. So it's great if Love uses the middle more, if we've got some guys with YAC ability, but the outside seems less risky.
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 01:28 pm
The edges ARE easier, and safer, that's why it seems that way. You can roll your pocket and give the QB more time. There's fewer defenders. You can throw it away out of bounds or run and slide.
Look, if you draw up a play that involves your QB standing in the pocket and drilling a 30 yard strike over the middle to a guy who SHOULD be open, you're kind of asking for trouble, IMO. But throwing shorter between the hashes doesn't have to be a risky proposition.
GregC
June 07, 2023 at 07:12 am
The difference between Rodgers and the rest of the league on throws over the middle may not look as big as expected, but it's pretty big. Percentages involving high volume tend to not look dramatic. But the difference between 46% and 38.5% is 7.5%, which is the same as the difference between a .300 hitter and a .225 hitter.
jont
June 07, 2023 at 01:42 pm
I appreciate your math (though it would be a .251 hitter), but my decision to look left or right is in no way comparable to my success in contest against a series of experts doing what they do best.
GregC
June 07, 2023 at 02:35 pm
If I'm not mistaken, the difference between .300 and .251 is 4.9 percentage points, while the difference between. 300 and .225 is 7.5 percentage points. I don't see how I could be wrong about this.
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 04:42 pm
The difference between .300 and .251 is .049. which would mean that over 100 events, one would be successful 30 times and the other only 25 times. A difference of 5 in a 100, or about 10 in 200 events.
You think that makes a statement. It doesn't. That "middle of the field" average is the average of quite a few guys who are less skilled, less experienced, and less smart. Rodgers knows the middle is much riskier than the edges, especially late. Yet, he still manages to throw over 1/3 of his passes down the middle.
I don't think that if Rodgers had thrown down the middle 10 more times last season it would have made a big difference. 5 fewer to the left, 5 fewer to the right, 10 more down the middle....that's the difference? That's what we have to do if we want to win the division?
I could think of at least 8 things we could do on offense that would improve us more than throwing down the middle more.
jont
June 08, 2023 at 12:11 pm
In junior high I was convinced I'd never need algebra, and I was right... until today.
x(.46) = .300(.385)
x(.46) = .1155
x = .1155/.46
x = .251
GregC
June 08, 2023 at 04:47 pm
You've computed the percentage difference, but I'm talking about percentage points, not percentages. You can google "percentage vs. percentage points" to find out the difference between the two terms.
jont
June 09, 2023 at 02:36 pm
It's not about %. We are not comparing 46 to 38.5; we are comparing two pairs to solve for a variable. 38.5 is to 46 as x is to .300. It's algebra vs arithmetic, and there is one correct answer. It's the way math is.
jont
June 07, 2023 at 01:44 pm
dupl
PackfanNY
June 07, 2023 at 07:23 am
Al, I agree that all of the draft picks are NOT making the roster this year. Of course, I think most if not all will end up on the practice squad. From the four you mentioned Dubose and Nichols seem most likely barring injury. Dubose is a guy I really like. However, I don’t think that means we lose them. Positionally, I think RB and WR are the least likely to get scooped up by another team from a practice squad. So from that standpoint, unless the guy really shines during the Exhibition season you can effectively hide him on the practice squad.
stockholder
June 07, 2023 at 07:25 am
I wouldn't put too much into that chart.
I remember they had Rodgers rolling out.
Splitting the field in 1/2 and catching the
Wrs coming over the middle.
But it is what it is isn't it?
The biggest thing is Separation.
And with the weapons Rodgers had.
How DID HE WIN THOSE MVPS.
Moving on:
With all the complaints about not kicking
the ball into the end Zone.
Crosby still came up big when it counted.
Not this years's Rookies?
Why not ? The safety position is in a mess.
We always have a place for a CB.
And next year Dillion might not be here.
Money changes people. You know that.
It looks like the WR battle will come
down to chemistry.
But the bigger Question, is still Jordan Love.
Oppy
June 07, 2023 at 09:06 am
The supposed drought of WR's getting separation in GB for the last near decade is a distortion perpetuated by talking heads as to why Rodgers would hold the ball too long in the pocket, scramble, then throw it away.
Rodgers became risk adverse and got to a point where he would routinely pass up throws that nearly all other QBs in the NFL would make regularly. Half a step on a defender is open in the NFL. Young QBs regularly get chastised on telecasts for not letting the ball go and allowing the receiver to make a play on the ball, "That's open in the NFL. You have to throw that ball", while Rodgers would shun those same throws to targets (often because he simply wanted to throw to his 'preferred' receiver deep downfield), the narrative became "Rodgers' receivers have to get more separation for their QB.. that's why he's holding the ball / throwing it away."
Younger Rodgers threw the ball into tight spaces, as well as allowed his WRs to go get the ball. He also used his entire corps of recievers, 1-5, to make plays. Rodgers circa 2015 through current often shuns the first and second passing windows, is extremely selective about who he trusts, and often bypasses throws that are there in progression because he's looking for the deep shot to Nelson/Adams downfield that might develop later.
There was a particular stretch in roughly 2016-2018 where 'Packers WRs can't get separation" was all the buzz. I never understood how people could believe that while so many open targets were screaming through the shallow to medium depth of the center of the field on slants or crossers wildly waving a hand in desperate attempt to get Rodgers' attention only to be ignored.
But moving on.
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 09:31 am
“But moving on.”
We have. I’m interested in what they are doing now as a window on what we are likely to be doing going forward. So far the signs are that a lot of things will be different. That’s what I hope proves true and we can therefore move on in terms if our focus as well.
Since'61
June 07, 2023 at 09:54 am
Coldworld I'm with you. I'm gradually becoming convinced that Rodgers continues to come up in discussions because there is literally nothing else about the current roster that is worth discussing. Rodgers remains the only topic in town.
If this continues into the regular season we'll know we have an actual problem.
The annual hype season seems to be in flux between accepting that Rodgers is actually gone and hyping every draft pick and/or 2nd year player becoming HOFers during 2023. Time for moving on. Thanks, Since '61
jannesbjornson
June 07, 2023 at 10:45 am
They probably bring in a veteran WR at cut-downs. I like Nicholls to make the squad. Enagbare for the dark horse.
LambeauPlain
June 07, 2023 at 11:52 am
I seriously doubt the Pack brings in another end of career vet to take snaps from the host of young talent.
And if there is younger vet still out there, I also doubt he would be an upgrade for who's already in uniform.
jannesbjornson
June 07, 2023 at 12:55 pm
Veteran, not end of career guy. The Watkins signing was a fail fromDay One. Veach made a shrewd trade for Toney and helped Win another SB.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 07, 2023 at 11:17 am
Yes, since 61 (and I've been watching since the Bart Starr days, too). The constant rehashing of what Rodgers did or didn't do and projecting how Love will be different is all there is to talk about. One poster yesterday claimed he fully believes Love will be "far and away" better than Rodgers or Favre in all aspects of play. So yes, hype season is in full swing. I've got a "wait and see what we've got" viewpoint.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 11:38 am
Hi. You can call me out. No worries, WCPF. I didn't make that statement to duck & hide from it. There's one helluva lot of proving that has to happen. Like, an entire career's worth!!! Of course. That's a given.
What? Does this make me crazy? No. I shared the stats coming in, the characteristics coming in that make me feel he will wind up being the best of the three. Yeah, I firmly stand behind my beliefs in Jordan Love as being #1, the better player walking through the door at 1265, and #2 that he's going to wind up the best of all three when it is all said and done.
100%
As for Rodgers? Yeah, I try to talk about him as little as possible, but, the fact is we are transitioning to a new QB1, and Rodgers will still pop up in conversations, and in articles here discussing how LaFleur's offense might change.
SUCK IT UP, BUTTERCUPS. Right? What are our options? I include myself in that too!
LOL... I'm right there, completely unable to watch any of Dusty's film reviews from last year (and I'm a HUGE Dusty Evely fan), adverse to rehash all that was done before... but, I understand this as being part of that transitioning process to our new era in Green Bay. Great.
Moving on, indeed!
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 07, 2023 at 03:40 pm
GG, dont apologize to the gatekeepers. They cant stand people being excited while theyre fearful of the unknown. Reminds me of the angry old fan who tried getting me kicked out of the 2014 playoff game vs Cowboys cuz I was standing and making noise when the defense got to 3rd down. They were cold and miserable so they just had to make me miserable too. They can go yell at clouds for all I care. Just keep being you and whoever doesnt like it can go pound sand.
Rebecca
June 07, 2023 at 03:21 pm
✔️❤️
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 10:51 am
Oppy, this echoes my point of view.
I have a good friend who was an Apache pilot back in the day, and one of his favorite truisms was that "There are bold pilots, and old pilots, but no old, bold, pilots"""" As you age and gain experience, you (hopefully) don't spend so much time on the borderline of Bold and Stupid. Or you crash and the problem is solved.
Either way, I want to say this: Throwing interceptions does not help the team. One turnover is worth, on average, 40 yards and 4 points. I'm overjoyed that the Packers QB is the all-time best at protecting the ball. I'm not a guy who likes to risk it on jump balls or 13 inch windows, and I'm glad Rodgers eschewed them, and I hope that Love also takes care of the ball, and although it's unlikely he'll be better at that than Rodgers, it's probable that he'll do it better than Favre.
Oppy
June 07, 2023 at 11:14 am
There's a point of diminishing returns in protecting the football i've spoken to previously. The bottom line is almost every team/QB to play in and win a Superbowl in the last twenty years has had double, triple or more INTs than Aaron Rodgers has in any given year.
At some point, limiting risks prevents positive plays that help win games more than it protects from turnovers that lose them.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 07, 2023 at 11:26 am
Oppy, I would need to know if those QBs were backed up by a solid or more than solid defense. That can allow for more risks. Rodgers was certainly NOT backed up by a solid or reliable defense for much of his later career; thus the idea of a turnover is much more costly. When the D can't stop the other team's offense, the last thing you want to do is give them another opportunity and lose one of your own.
And actually, I'd love to see your stats on that.
Oppy
June 07, 2023 at 01:19 pm
It's not my job to fact check your knee-jerk 'gut feeling' defense of his royal majesty the infallible Aaron Charles Rodgers.
Do the work, report back.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 07, 2023 at 03:06 pm
So you're saying you can't back up the statement?
The bottom line is almost every team/QB to play in and win a Superbowl in the last twenty years has had double, triple or more INTs than Aaron Rodgers has in any given year.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 12:19 pm
B I N G O !!!!
One heads up a friend of mine shared was the number 1 factor most consistent in determining which team will win a football game is "sacks taken," not INTs. The team who takes the fewest sacks usually wins the game.
I was kind of stunned to learn this, from him, a former Packers beat writer & seasoned bettor.
barutanseijin
June 07, 2023 at 05:15 pm
His refusal to throw to open receivers is one reason why it was time for Rodgers to go. It was also a reason he was unable to win in the playoffs. Looks great in superficial statistics and emmveepee whoring, though.
RCPackerFan
June 07, 2023 at 07:43 am
"Love has really been attacking the middle of the field during OTAs. The Packers have been running a lot of slants and crossers, and Love has been finding the soft spot in the defense."
We will see but they drafted 2 TE's and a WR that figures to get a lot of playing time in the slot. It doesn't feel like its all about the QB. It feels like schematically they want to attack the middle of the field more.
It's over Mason -
Crosby will be missed. He had a great career and will be missed. It makes sense why they are moving on from Crosby. They are essentially restarting and now is the time to break in a new kicker.
Not this year, rookies -
My guess is 3 of the 4 make it. I think Johnson, Valentine and DuBose likely have the best chances at making it. Nichols could, but they have went with 2 RB's in the past. Goodson has had a great OTA's so far. Taylor has experience. Its going to be tough for Nichols to make it. I believe tougher then the other 3. But that's why these decisions aren't made today.
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 09:00 am
Love said that the middle of the field has been a point of coaching emphasis this week. Given what they are doing, it’s not surprising that he’s throwing there often therefore. The good news is that that seems to be that the middle is once again central to the intended offense.
With TEs Musgrave, Kraft, Z/Ys Reed, Toure, Melton, RB/slots Jones & Goodson and X/big slots DuBose & Heath as well as Doubs and Watson crossing from the edges it bloody well ought to be. A lot of size, speed, agility and suddenness that should be over the middle this summer.
SoCalJim
June 07, 2023 at 10:54 am
Why am I only allowed to give Coldworld’s post one thumbs up? I’m looking forward to seeing this point of emphasis show up in this season’s games.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 07, 2023 at 11:27 am
Yeah, maybe if they had given Rodgers some talented TEs or slot guys, he would have thrown more to the middle. He did with Adams and other guys earlier on, but who did he have to rely on there?
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 12:47 pm
Maybe, maybe not. Just happy that the early signs are that the post Rodgers offense will encompass the middle actively.
Rodgers will to an extent define his own legacy this year and the passage of time will help provide perspective as well. Part of that involves knowing what LaFleur does without him.
Constantly referring everything back to what Rodgers did or what his motivations or external reasons may have been gets us nowhere. Let’s let it go and look to the now present indications of what lies in the future. The past will look after itself whatever we do.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 01:17 pm
What no one is mentioning is that throwing to your receivers in the middle of the field tends to ratchet up their chances of injuries. Some QBs have been know not to protect their receivers. Some have been known to throw them open also.
TKWorldWide
June 07, 2023 at 08:01 am
Force the defense to cover the whole field, both width and depth. It appears that GB has the playbook, the receivers, and the QB to do it.
GPG!
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 07, 2023 at 11:18 am
Bingo, TK. Leave no blade of grass untouched.
croatpackfan
June 07, 2023 at 08:26 am
This time I will have just to agree with you, Al. Nothing to add.
I believe, Mason as good person as he is understand that his time for being player in NFL is over. Father time catch him and I believe that was mutual agreement, w/o any drama, between Packers and Mason to finish his career. While I do not expect his number to be retired, he will be in Packers HOF soon. He deserved that by his performance and, not less important, by his behavior as Packers. He will be remembered in Packers Nation as one of the greatest.
Regarding drafted rookies I bet that because of Brendon Cox, one of them will not make the team. My bet is on Nickols or DuBoise (DuBoise might finish on PUP list or on IR).
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 08:38 am
We don’t know what the health issue is with DuBose, but there’s no suggestion it’s long term at this point. If he is stuck on the PUP much beyond start camp then the PS becomes a more likely berth, but that could just benefit Heath.
As to Brenton Cox, he’s fighting Hollins really, if all stay healthy, but until the pads come on that fight doesn’t really start. If Gary isn’t yet ready to return, he’s probably in a good spot on paper to make it anyway if he continues to draw praise and behave. Smith, Van Ness, Enagbare and seemingly Hollins is the depth order based on what we’ve seen so far. I doubt they go in with less than 5 OLBs.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 09:36 am
Good call, croatpackfan.
Gutekunst does have a history of stashing players on PUP for further development, seen previously with Nijman. DuBose might find himself in that position this season.
LeotisHarris
June 07, 2023 at 08:34 am
Damn kickers. You find a great one and then just have to turn around in 17 years and get another one. Let's hope they still make 'em like they used to.
Thanks, Mason.
Oppy
June 07, 2023 at 08:47 am
Rodgers HAS been throwing over the middle much more under Matt LaFleur than he was during his last many years under MM. It is one area where Rodgers did show a willingness to change his habits to some extent.
One thing he often did, however, was throw those passes to targets over the middle (particularly the short-to-medium depth targets) with very, very low balls or ball somewhat behind the WR, which often led to the receiver having to severely contort or break stride to catch the ball, resulting in few YAC. But at least he was throwing them over the middle more often.
In Rodgers *real* prime ( MVPs of late be damned- we're talking about 2010-2014), Rodgers would throw over the middle with authority, be it deep seams or shallow crossers, with balls placed at chest to shoulder height out in front of the target leading them in stride to open field. Risk adverse Rodgers of 2015-2018 would rarely throw between the hashes, while under LaFleur, he has returned to some semblance of balance in his field distribution, although his fear of picks has put many less-than-ideal balls over the middle.
LambeauPlain
June 07, 2023 at 12:02 pm
MM's last few years in Green Bay was based heavily on chunk plays, especially to the perimeter. They were throwing there a third of all plays...easily leading the league. MM's offense was so predictable even as he gave lip service to the run game.
MLF has shown he values a balanced attack that was skewed toward passing with Rodgers freedom pre snap.
Return to balance and IOC on offense, please. Let Love lean on his teammates. Team stuff. Use the whole field and playbook.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 01:21 pm
MLFs offense was very balanced till they got to the red zone. This season should tell if that was on him, Rodgers or the O-line. I tend NOT to blame the runners.
Oppy
June 07, 2023 at 01:30 pm
When you refer to "MM's last few years in Green Bay", are you referring to the last few years where Rodgers was openly defying his head coach?
MM didn't change his entire offensive philosophy from what was wildly successful for his first near decade in Green Bay- the QB changed the way he played.
Razer
June 07, 2023 at 08:49 am
I think that much of Rodgers throwing tendency was dictated by his TE/WR talent. The Packers never favoured the smaller, quick twitch receiver that could exploit the middle nor did we have many TEs who had enough talent to feed in the middle. Most of Rodgers later career was throwing to guys who got little separation so the crowded middle was not the place to play the game. If we don't equip Love with enough catching talent he will be gambling over the middle or playing it safer on the sidelines.
LambeauPlain
June 07, 2023 at 12:15 pm
Randall Cobb? He's the smaller quick twitch slot player they favored...twice. They also drafted Amari Rodgers for that role, unfortunately.
Kind of a chicken egg issue. If you don't throw to the middle, guys won't get the experience and learning required to hone the skill in traffic. Most of these kids did it in college, so I think they will literally run with it.
Rodgers, unlike Love, was very risk averse to the INT. He was so invested in not making them, preferring to throw the ball away or take the sack. That stalled the O's tempo and drives.
I think Love will be willing to take more risks with INTs but also let his receivers make a play.
And, the middle of the field is where AJ, AJD, Musgrave, Kraft and Deguara need to attack for their receptions.
For opposing D's, gonna be more Packer meddling in the middle this year!
SicSemperTyrannis
June 07, 2023 at 06:44 pm
I never thought of "meddlesome" as a football term, but I hope to see it!
Spock
June 07, 2023 at 09:03 am
Love this column as always, Al. Who'd of thought that you'd be sad to see Mason go after the way you felt about him during his famous "slump" year, lol. I'm stoked for this young team. I'm managing expectations, but just think this will be a very, very, fun and competitive team to watch this year. GPG!
Since'61
June 07, 2023 at 09:36 am
I never understood how the myth of Aaron's Rodgers refusing to throw over the middle began. But like most things it was just a matter of people not paying attention and of course the media creating a crisis that didn't exist yet again. Having said that I do believe that as the quality of Rodgers receiving corps declined over the last 3-4 seasons, with the exception of Adams, Rodgers did not have the confidence to throw over the middle as often as he had earlier in his career. The risk of having a pass tipped or go off a receivers hands increases the possibilities for a turnover.
However Rodgers continued to throw quick slants and medium to long passes over the middle even during recent seasons. As I have often posted before just watch the games, pay attention and ignore the broadcasters and sports media air heads.
Sorry to read about what looks like the actual end for Mason Crosby's career in Green Bay. He was an excellent kicker and he was a great Packer. I wish him well in his future. Who knows the Packers may need to bring him back yet if the current kickers on the roster prove to be flops.
I see Johnson and Nichols as the 7th rounders with the best shot at making the roster. Valentine and Dubose could make the PS. We'll see.
Great job as usual Al. Thanks, Since '61
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 10:57 am
All kinds of myths get started and grow. As the editor of the Shinbone Star said, "When the myth becomes legend, print the legend". I can't believe that people are critical of a QB who has been all-time BEST at protecting the rock.
I understand we were frustrated with our offense last year, for good reason, but Rodgers continuing to protect the ball isn't one of them.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 07, 2023 at 11:12 am
Not throwing over the middle and not throwing picks are not necessarily mutually eclusive. Rodgers was pretty damn good at avoiding ints earlier in his career when he still threw over the middle a lot. The criticism comes when you look at the predictability factor. When a defense knows a qb is less likely to attack the middle, they know they dont have to emphasize middle-closed coverage. Not utilizing the whole field gives the defense the advantage. Sure it didnt amount to more interceptions but it amounts to a less effective offense overall. Its not just blind criticism. Also, simple physics plays into it. Its more difficult to complete a pinpoint 10 yard pass outside the numbers than it is to complete a 10 yard pass inside the numbers. It may only be 10 yards in game yardage, but it is a much further and more difficult throw to make. My biggest criticism of Rodgers is that he became too reliant on lower % throws over the years. The refusal to attack the middle of the field reflects that.
Since'61
June 07, 2023 at 12:01 pm
Leatherhead - Aaron Rodgers is the best that I have seen at ball security. Prior to Rodgers I would have said that Starr was the best but Rodgers who spent a significant amount of time with Starr early in his career became the student who surpassed the master in terms of ball security. Thanks, Since '61
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 01:40 pm
Objectively, he's the best ever at taking care of the rock. He rarely, if ever, costs us a game by having turnovers.
Bart said "I didn't want to do anything to hurt the team"
Favre said "I have to make a play"
Those turnovers count. Maybe not the ones against a weaker team during the season, but in the playoffs, you're playing a good team and you just can't give away the ball away and win. I'm grateful that Rodgers is so good at protecting the ball, because the only thing more valuable than possession of the ball is a touchdown. Every time the offense gives up possession of the ball without a TD it's a win for the defense. Turnovers, downs, missed FGs....they end up stopping almost 70% of drives. If you're in a game where you only get 11 possessions, and you turn it over 3 times, that means you have to be extra good with your remaining 8 chances.
Since'61
June 07, 2023 at 02:59 pm
Leatherhead I think that we agree completely on the effect of turnovers in terms of their impact on the outcome of the game.
The one huge advantage which Starr had that Rodgers never had during his career except for the 2010 season is that he knewif he took a sack on 3rd down and the Packers punted his defense was very likely to get the ball back for him probably with a 3 and out against the opposing offense.
Rodgers never really played with a defense that he could have that type of confidence to get the ball back. Favre did for '95 -'98. But Favre was usually winging it anyway.
In the end both Starr and Rodgers rarely hurt the team with turnovers. They were both very smart players in that regard. Thanks, Since '61
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 07:10 pm
I think the stuff about Rodgers "huge" disadvantage of not having a defense with 6 HOFers is kind of weak, since pretty much every QB in the history of QBs hasn't had that kind of support.
Even back in 1965, teams gained yards and scored points against the Packers. Yes, it's true. One team went over 30 on them. I remember that game. Chicago had a rookie RB that year who just shredded all those HOFers for about 200 yards. Later that season, the Vikings put up 251 rushing yards on the same bunch.
The point being, they pulled their jocks on three legs at a time, just like the rest of us. I did discover an odd fact while looking at the 1965 team.....league scoring average was 23.1, which is more than it is now. Over 50 years of innovation, rules to improve the passing game and protect the QB, and at the end of the day.....scoring has gone down. Hmmmmmmm..........
jannesbjornson
June 07, 2023 at 10:57 am
See if Valentine can move Shemar, or Ballentine off the roster. Otherwise, another empirical evaluation of the passing tendencies myth. Spot on. I am also pushing for Johnson and Nichols. If you watch MAC football, you know about Nichols.
Oppy
June 07, 2023 at 11:01 am
it wasn't a myth, it was a statistically validated fact during the second half of the last decade.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 07, 2023 at 11:05 am
How is it a myth when the statistics prove he threw a lot less to the middle of the field than the league average? And that doesnt even account for the Shanahan-style offense he was supposed to be running that emphasizes attacking the middle of the field. Look at the 49ers, pre-Stafford Rams (before McVay scrapped the Shanahan offense), and the Lions (who implemented the Shanahan offense last year because Goff runs that offense well). They all attack(ed) the middle of the field at will with a heavy emphasis on playaction crossing routes. Thats what this offense was supposed to resemble. The % of passes over the middle for the Packers should have been well above league average rather than below. Its far from a myth, its reality.
Since'61
June 07, 2023 at 12:08 pm
The myth as I stated was that Rodgers refused to throw over the middle. It was perpetuated by numerous posters here at CHTV. The reality is that he did throw over the middle less in recent seasons versus refused which as I pointed out was due to the decline in the quality off his receiving corps.
Can you blame any QB for not wanting to throw over the middle to receivers like J'mon Moore, ESB, MVS and even Lazard to name a few. They were drop machines. We also need to remember that Rodgers saw these guys and threw to them everyday in practice. He knew who was capable of making plays and who wasn't.
I just don't understand how or why alleged fans complain so often and so vehemently about a QB who excelled at protecting the football. There are other legit criticisms that can be made about Rodgers but protecting the football should not be one of them. If you want to talk about statistics talk about the stat that Rodgers has the lowest interception percentage of all time and that he has the best TD/Interception ratio of all time. That's the reality.
Concerning how the offense should have been run ask yourself whose fault is that? Rodgers? Really! Who is the Head Coach and where was he while Rodgers was allegedly running his own offense. If in fact he was running the offense differently than he should have why did the Head Coach allow it? I could see maybe a transition period during the 2019 season, maybe. But why? And beyond that why was Rodgers allowed to get away with it for 4 seasons. What does that tell us about the head coach and his conviction in his own system. Can anyone here actually believe that Mike Holmgren would have allowed Favre or Rodgers or any QB to run the offense differently than Holmgren expected. Would Holmgren have allowed any QB to change the plays as often as Rodgers is accused of changing the plays? Does Andy Reid allow Mahomes to run his own offense? Any NFL head coach who allows that to happen should not be an NFL Head Coach past the first season that it happens.
As the Head Coach you either install your system and the players run it or you don't have a system. When you accuse Rodgers of running the offense differently than it should be run you are actually accusing MLF of failing as a Head Coach and of not being able to deal with his players.
Bottom line, MLF is the head Coach. He is responsible for the teams results and won/loss record. If he was in fact allowing Rodgers to get away with all that he is accused of doing MLF and the Packers FO have no one to blame but themselves because they allowed it. End of story. Case closed. Thanks, Since '61
croatpackfan
June 07, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Since, I will not put as argument to the discussion that ACR was more reluctant to use middle of the field after 2014 season and it would be interesting what data would show usage of middle of the field from 2008 to 2014 and 2015 to 2022. Than we can debate what was the ACR tendencies with throws in the middle of the field.
What I noticed in 2 games played vs Seattle at Seattle that ACR was throwing ball only on the other side of the field from Sherman. Packers lost both games and especially was painful loss in NFCCG when Sherman was playing hurt (shoulder injury) and just run side of the WR, but ACR was totally turned to the other side of the field. ACR had/has his demons and every DC who can recognize them will produce under average play from ACR. As older he became, he was more reluctant to throw the ball of his primary and prefered target. It was recognized by opponents and better teams were using that against him.
And that is truth that can be checked statistically...
Regarding MLF bowing to ACR wishes was reported from ACR by himself and confirmed by MLF. And that was my main complaint towrds MLF. You are either HC or you are puppet. And I agree with you that he is responsible for 8-9 record last season, because he allowed injured player to play (and to play badly) in fear of problems that could be caused by that player. That is not manager (what HC should be) of the team. And we all asking ourselves why D played so bad. It is result of 2 factors: 1. more important, ACR team mates saw that they can do whatever they want and there is no accountability and 2. important, but somewhat less (in the circumstances) Joe Barry. Although, you might questioned if Joe Barry lose his D players or he was not allowed by the same players to coach them
Since'61
June 07, 2023 at 12:42 pm
Croat - as far as the 2014 NFCCG the first thing to remember is that Rodgers played that game on an injured leg. The second thing to remember is that Mike McCarthy designed the game plan for that game with the following factor in his mind.
1. The Packers were playing the defending SB champions and #1 ranked defense in the league at Seattle's home field.
2. McCarthy wanted to run the ball against Seattle's defense with Ed Lacy as a battering ram in an attempt to wear down the Seattle defense and keep Wilson and the offense off the field. During the first drive of the game the Packers ran the ball nearly exclusively all the way down the field and they continued to try to run the ball against Seattle for most of the game.
3. AS for Sherman at that point in his career throwing against him was not a good idea for any QB just like throwing against the Packers Jaire Alexander has not been a very successful idea for current QBs. More importantly however is that for Rodgers to throw to Sherman's side of the field during the 2014 NFCCG would have meant that Rodgers would have had to push off his injured leg to get enough on the ball to get it to his receiver before Sherman picked it off. The Packers decided that the risk was not worth it.
4. Everyone discusses the numerous reasons why the Packers lost that game and there are plenty of reasons. But I posted immediately after the game and repeatedly since then that the Packers lost that game because of Rodgers leg injury. If Rodgers had both legs healthy he would have run for first downs when he had the chance on at least three of the Packers drives in that game. But because he didn't have the mobility he usually had in those days, which was a big part of his game in those earlier years, he couldn't run for first downs against Seattle. Had he done so the Packers would have extended drives, using up more time on the clock and they probably would have scored more points. In that scenario Seattle would not have had the time or the opportunity to mount their late comeback against the Packers collapsing defense and failing STs.
There is no question of Rodgers decline in play as he became older but look at the OL play in front of him and the quality of his receivers, except for Adams, during those seasons. No matter who the QB is, they don't play the game alone. Thanks, Since n'61
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 07, 2023 at 03:21 pm
See GG's post towards the top referrencing Dusty Evely's work on this subject. Over the last 4 years, not counting rpo plays (which are literally run plays with a receiver or 2 running a route over the middle), Rodgers ranked 65th out of 67 qualifying qbs in targeting the middle of the field. Whereas, Jimmy G, in what was supposed to be a nearly identicle offense, was #1 out of 67 in targeting the middle of the field. Its not even debatable. And for the record, I dont care how long you've been a fan. Are you expecting free soup or something?
Since'61
June 07, 2023 at 03:35 pm
First off I've already conceded the point that Rodgers did not throw over the middle often during the last few seasons. I'm not debating any of that.
Secondly Jimmy G has had George Kittle as his TE to throw over the middle to. Rodgers has had ?????
Thirdly who cares what Jimmy G or any other team does. We're talking about the Packers here. Besides I put the question out there in my earlier post, "If Rodgers wasn't running the offense as it should be run whose fault is that?"
Fourth I don't understand how long I have been a fan has to do with anything. If you don't care about how long I've been a fan why bring it up at all?
And exactly which record are you referring to? Does it have anything to do with "Double Secret Probation?"
Fifth, fortunately I can state unequivocally that I don't expect or need soup or anything else for free. Although I do enjoy a piping hot French Onion Soup on a chilly winter's day. Thanks, Since '61
barutanseijin
June 07, 2023 at 06:41 pm
Rodgers was good at not throwing interceptions . You win by scoring more points, not by throwing fewer interceptions. Ol’ Rodge threw fewer INTs than Russ and Tom Brady but still lost those championship games.
Rodgers was never going to get to another super bowl with his strategy. It worked against Trestman’s Bears, but it was a losing strategy against better teams. People complained because they could see through it. So could defenses.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 12:16 pm
You have a good very point there.
I believe you had to let Rodgers play to his believed strengths however, or it would be defeating the purpose of him being the QB. Oh! That brings back other arguments that have been coming up lately.
Since'61
June 07, 2023 at 03:21 pm
T7Steve I agree that you need to let Rodgers play to his strengths but I don't see any reasons why MLF's system would not include those opportunities for Rodgers especially off of play action passes based on the ground game which is part of the MLF system.
However when you (read Murphy) utilize a superficial hiring process, specifically one two hour meeting, to hire the second most important position in your organization perhaps the organization should not expect better than superficial results.
2023 will begin to give us som answers on that issue. Thanks, Since '61
Guam
June 08, 2023 at 07:54 am
I don't believe it is a myth Since '61. Please see GreenGold's review/comment of the Dusty Evely study on Rodgers throwing over the middle. Evely did a deeper dive on Rodgers after he discovered Rodgers threw over the middle less (38.5% vs 46%) than the average NFL team. If you remove RPO throws over the middle but behind the line of scrimmage, Rodgers threw dramatically fewer passes over the middle. He ranked 65th out of 67 QBs in throws over the middle beyond the line of scrimmage (minimum of 100 throws).
Yes, Rodgers does throw some passes over the middle, but much less than most teams/QBs. I think there is a reason LsFleur has been emphasizing passes over the middle during OTA's. He wants his new QB to use the middle of the field more often than Rodgers has.
PewAuKeeFan
June 07, 2023 at 11:21 am
Thanks for the excellent article Al.
I know that the other writers do try to write good articles.
But you don't just try, you always deliver!
Alberta_Packer
June 07, 2023 at 11:26 am
The middle for Rodgers was like Tolkein's middle-earth - a place where humans inhabited but was fraught with evil and monsters (especially linebackers). So probably a place to not always be brave - especially if one lacked another hero or two.
As for the bounty of hopeful rookies. Better too many than too few. Or, finding quality through quantity.
bottlefliper
June 07, 2023 at 11:42 am
Its always the media, the NFL, the myth.....its never AR and dont talk about stats and numbers. Other than that is the real bad media, that one AR is using. And McAffee may be one of the better once. Look at his barstool friend or Rogan. If you want call that media, than its really bad. But people just get what they want and not the other way around.
He had no weapons just more than any other top QB on average over the years. Brady won with undersized WR, even for slot guys.
He had some great ones too, but so did AR. But it always the D, the weapons, the weather or the Coach. Sometimes the media. Never the diva.
He did not turn it over, but at what cost. He hold it forever and did not throw it away. How many games did he won when it counts? He was such a big part of the SC and did not play like it. We are in much better shape now, even Love is not that great
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 03:48 pm
"""" He hold it forever and did not throw it away.""""
That would usually end up in a sack, a long time before forever. And Rodgers didn't take a lot of sacks. I've seen him throw it away, many times. It's better than a sack or a turnover.
How many games could he have lost, when it counted, by not protecting the ball?
It's funny, because Bart was a guy who was real careful with the ball, too, and people said the same thing. But IMO, not turning it over is the single biggest thing you can do on offense. For anybody out there who is a Dad, you've got to protect the baby above everything. I think if you looked at the best offenses, you'll see fewer turnovers. In fact, I'm going to go check.
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 08:23 pm
Just reading this long exchange makes me feel like I passed through the Time Tunnel. Come on folks, eyes forward, focus on the future. It’s more interesting, honestly, and to be honest, a lot of the Rodgers debate will probably benefit from the perspective afforded by the passage of a year or two and the perspective that brings.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 09:22 pm
Same. The future is more fun, too, and good for you!
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Doesn't seem like a good sign for those that think Love can be better than Rodgers was last year:
"On Tuesday, Love threw Doubs’ way twice in that drill, completing a crosser for 14 yards and a comeback route for six yards before the drive ended with a goal-line interception on a poorly thrown ball late over the middle to Watson.
When Love isn’t throwing ducks -- and there have been more than a couple of wobblers so far in OTAs -- he’s throwing to No. 87."
https://www.espn.com/blog/green-bay-packers/post/_/id/53335/romeo-doubs-...
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 07, 2023 at 12:43 pm
It's OTA's. But I bet you're just loving the negative reports.
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 01:47 pm
Actually, he's probably happy that Love is connecting with Doubs, who he has been a fan of since the beginning. From my point of view, having a primary threat on the opposite side of the field from Watson is a good thing for us.
Love has thrown some bad balls in OTAs, and that's why you have training camps, which start in about six weeks or so. IMO, you're going to see a different offense out there in the opener than the one which has scored 7 and 3 in our last two openers. I'm going way out on a limb here, but I think we'll score more points than we did in those two games. Combined. By the second quarter.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 02:05 pm
LOL. You... you.... thrill seeker, you...!!!
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 03:47 pm
Why would I be? I actually don't like hearing he's throwing ducks because it means he hasn't corrected his mechanics yet, which isn't a good sign. I'd love it if he became a top 10 QB but I have my doubts. Wounded ducks equal Ints.
Coldworld
June 07, 2023 at 01:09 pm
Love threw just under half his passes to Doubs (7 of 15, of which 5 were completed), who LaFleur noted was constantly getting open in and out of the end zone and catching the ball. If the latter part is true then it suggests that is a logical place to put it. Apart from the throw across his chest late in the 2 minute drill (aimed at Watson in the middle of the field too), what would you suggest in a 2 receiver set. Musgrave dropped a TD. Watson doesn’t seem as comfortable expanding his route tree as Doubs has apparently been. Reed is still finding his feet, Toure was with the seconds.
I don’t get the basis for or validity of your point at all. Love apparently otherwise was good yesterday, but as a less conservative player (almost inevitably) there are going to be moments like that even allowing for further growth past OTAs. Love and anybody else are very very likely to be more prone to interceptions than Rodgers, even if they ultimately make it to Canton.
T7Steve
June 07, 2023 at 01:31 pm
I heard the all-time leader in interceptions made it into Canton on his first ballot opportunity.
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 02:52 pm
If you'd like to have a balanced attack, then a receiving target on the other side of the field is a really good thing to have, and hopefully Doubs/Reed/Toure will provide that.
I've watched Love throw enough to know that he can throw strikes. I've seen it.
What he has to do to help us win in Chicago is get the ball into the hands of Jones/Dillon, Watson and Doubs. Occasionally we might give a shot to Musgrave or Reed or somebody else, but basically, if he gets the ball into the hands of those four guys, we're going to win.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
I'd also like to add that Love knew he had committed the "mortal sin" of throwing late down the middle. Much better to make a mistake in OTAs, and preseason, than when it counts. I'm not worried about Love, it's the rest of the team, and if they do their jobs, Love is going to be fine.
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 07:30 pm
None of you seem to be getting the point I'm making. I know he can throw strikes. But he also shows inconsistent techniques and when he throws with bad technique things don't look good. It's been 3 full years, he should have ironed 95% out by now.
I'm not sure how many people realize how much Rodgers' throwing motion changed between college and his 1st year as a starter. Not just with clean pockets but when all hell was braking loose. They also don't realize how incredibly rare that is. On top of that how accurate he was throwing on the move in his prime. I call them deflates, where it just knifes the other team like WTF are we supposed to do against this.
I'm rooting for Love, I just think he could wind up in Jameis Winston territory if he can't consistently display good technique under fire. I almost hate to pick on Winston because I think Payton had really helped him smooth out the rough edges before Tampa ruined his knee that year.
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 04:52 pm
If you watch Kurt Warners breakdown of 2022L Love you'll see a couple really bad passes to RBs out of backfield and in the flat. I think he's got a rocket with proper technique but when he hurries a throw or just doesn't use proper mechanics they don't have oomph on them or are inaccurate.
How many more Ints do you think he can throw Compared To Rodgers' 12 last year and finish with the same record?
jannesbjornson
June 07, 2023 at 05:49 pm
He is a taller guy. He has to work on his footwork which is key to delivery in any version of the WCO, or in any hand and eye sport like tennis, golf, or baseball. He has to get those feet rotating faster and get the hips and legs into the pass with torque.
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 07:19 pm
I don't know how much height plays into it, I just know when he uses proper footwork he can really hum it. When he doesn't a RB has to work to catch the ball 15 lateral yards away from him and they got stopped immediately instead of getting a 6 or 8 yard gain. That's not good.
barutanseijin
June 07, 2023 at 06:45 pm
We’ll see how your team does with their has been QB. Good luck!
LLCHESTY
June 07, 2023 at 07:34 pm
Love is a has been already?
As for the Jets I think they'll be just fine, after all they have a HC who was once a very good DC. I don't think that D will slip much and I'm pretty sure Rodgers can do better than the 15 TDs the Jets QBs threw last year. But tough conference, I doubt they can finish higher than a WC team.
Boneman
June 07, 2023 at 04:04 pm
The distribution isn't shocking but our results weren't particularly great in the middle of the field. At least until Watson hit his stride. All of Cobb and Tonyan and many of Lazards catches were in the middle of the field but none of these players made much of an impact there. I remember Farve used to attack the middle extremely well with deep slants and then come underneath to his backs. Have Dillon or Jones ever caught a checkdown in the middle of the field? Their targets always seem to be wide...
It will be fun to see the difference with more dangerous weapons and a more willing passer.
jannesbjornson
June 07, 2023 at 05:51 pm
Favre's high numbers of INTs are also a result of forcing the middle.
Packers0808
June 07, 2023 at 05:29 pm
Just a feeling this team is going to be full of surprises and be a big surprise in the league and win the NFC quite handily. Optimistic you bet, much than the last few years with Rodgers what the hell he wanted too.
Leatherhead
June 07, 2023 at 07:12 pm
I agree. This team is going to start with a lot more focus and energy than they showed in their last two openers. With any luck, we'll start the season with two road wins, including a division win, before our home opener. I see a clear path to 4-0, actually.
greengold
June 07, 2023 at 08:03 pm
Packers0808, I do find this funny.
Like yourself, I’m an optimist in general. As far as this year’s Packers team goes, I too feel it’s going to be loaded with surprises.
It’s not a “blind optimism,” either. You know, the kind many feel a duty to slap others around with their keyboards over? You have a feeling this team of young players will be a success. Me too. And that optimism didn’t just happen.
First, there was the matter of getting a malcontent narcissist who felt he was more important than anyone on this team the hell out. Thank you, Woody Johnson.
Beyond that is the overwhelming cleansing breath I believe nearly everyone in the Packers organization collectively has taken.
Work is enjoyable again once an ominous black cloud moves out of the way of progress. That’s true in any field, including football.
There’s a number of other factors in play, going back to Love’s drafting, along with so many other players since, 33 of them drafted since? Plus UDFAs? That’s a major turnover.
Go backwards to see how many players remain: Bak, Clark, Jones, Jaire, Gary, Savage, Jenkins? Who am I missing? This off the top of the rock in my head.
The point is, an entire collection of factors converging together has given me this same feeling like: LOOK OUT!
THAT level of optimism.
Right down to Gutekunst looking every bit like an ascending talent as a GM. I think his work has been First Rate these past two years. LaFleur actually having that yoke of AR pressure usurping his leadership as HC removed. Barry & Bisaccia fully loaded with the talent they need. Everybody involved in the organization appearing to be having some fun… Look at the players! Lighter. Focused. Enthused. Chemistry being built together in having ridden out the storm. Survivors.
All of it conducive to WINNING.
Everyone collectively doing their jobs to the best of their abilities, as Sic Semper Tyrannis points to often, and winning this sucker is within their grasp.
Lolz. Bumps on the optimism, my brother.
Connor Wall
June 08, 2023 at 03:30 am
There will definitely be tough competition for the rookies this year, given the number of draft picks the Packers have. But I think all the rookies in the seventh round have the potential and the talent to be useful players for the Packers. They showed their strengths in colleges and training camps. I don't think the numbers game will be an obstacle for them. it's important that newcomers get to grips with the Packers team system and be able to partner with established players. Team chemistry and interaction on the field play an important role in achieving success. Let's see if they have the ability to adapt to the team system and compete for a place on the roster.