Around the NFC North: Roster Review
They cut all the guys I liked.
By Mike Price

Bad job by me last week. Talked about multiple people making teams who would just get cut the next day. Unclear why the teams don't cut everyone at once but that's how it goes. Let's go over some highlights for each team's 53-man roster.
Lions
- Turns out I was right about Hendon Hooker. The Lions ditched Nate Sudfeld and will be going with Hooker as the back-up QB.
- The team kept just four receivers at cutdown day and then signed Tim Patrick to the practice squad (along with Allen Robinson and Donovan Peoples-Jones) who the Broncos cut. Everyone is talking about how Patrick, a former UDFA from Utah, is the perfect Lions receiver. He's big, he blocks and he can make contested catches. I don't 100% buy it. Those features would make a perfect Sean Payton receiver too and he unceremoniously cut Patrick. Never mind that Patrick is 30 years old (will turn 31 during the season) and is coming off a torn ACL. Patrick will probably be fine for a third or fourth receiver, but I doubt he's gonna be a huge difference maker here.
- Jakes Bates, who wowed UFL fans last year and had a visit with the Packers, made the team as kicker. Bates has an incredibly strong leg but missed some kicks in the pre-season. Some reporters speculated that the team would bring on a veteran kicker to the practice squad at some point so we'll see how long Bates' leash is.
- Former Packer Ty Summers, who impressed at Lions camp, ended up on the Giants' practice squad. Former Badger Rachad Wildgoose was cut and went unclaimed.
Bears
- The Bears didn't really make a whole lot of big name cuts. They cut veteran fullback Khari Blasingame and QB Brett Rypien and not a whole lot of other people who have or likely will make impacts on an NFL roster, at least this year.
- The practice squad additions were led by third string QB Austin Reed who reportedly impressed during training camp. The Bears also signed former Packer Samori Toure.
- 40-year-old former Packer Marcedes Lewis made the initial 53 as a the third tight end. He'll play behind Gerald Everett and Cole Kmet in what many expect to be a scheme that uses a lot of multiple tight end sets.
- Former Packer Jonathan Owens did make the team. The Bears kept a few players with Wisconsin ties: TJ Edwards and Jack Sanborn (who we talked about a lot last year).
Vikings
- The Vikings made plenty of unexpected cuts including former first round pick Lewis Cine, my favorite, Kene Nwangwu (who apparently failed a physical with the Saints and is still a free agent), and former Army edge Andre Carter. Carter was signed to the practice squad. They also left TJ Hockenson on the PUP list.
- The team currently has just two running backs. Very unusual, especially when you consider how injury prone Aaron Jones is and the fact that the team doesn't have an ancient receiver/kick returner to convert to running back.
- Jaren Hall made the initial roster as third QB but was then cut so that the team could sign Bears castoff Brett Rypien instead.
- Big Bob Tonyan did not make the 53 but did stay on the team via the practice squad. As far as I can tell there aren't any other former Packers though Andrew Van Ginkel, former Badger, is expected to start at edge.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Mike Price is a lifelong Packers fan who recently moved from Utah to Stoughton (a Madison suberb). You can follow him on twitter at @themikeprice.
__________________________




Comments (22)
T7Steve
September 03, 2024 at 10:54 am
The Vikings must have brought someone else onto the practice squad that's a running back, didn't they? I've a hard time believing they'd only have 2 on game day unless they have a bunch of fullbacks.
Leatherhead
September 03, 2024 at 11:25 am
If I recall correctly, teams make roster moves AFTER the first game for some reason. I don't know if it's some contractual stuff or whatever, but the Vikings don't have to play the season with only two RBs....they only need to make it through one game. That's doable, IMO.
If the offensive line permits it, they're going to be throwing a lot to the WRs. It's the strength of their offense. I have little faith in Jones' ability to play 17 games this season. Hockenson is on PUP to start the season.
If the offensive line doesn't permit that, then the Vikings will be playing their 3rd string QB soon enough.
Coldworld
September 03, 2024 at 12:56 pm
I think you are thinking vested veterans. If they are signed and on the roster for week one, their salary is fully guaranteed. If they are signed after that it is not.
As far as I can see, they have two running backs on the roster and two on the PS. I presume one will be elevated come game day. They like Ty Chandler, so I would imagine that they think they have a one and two and will go with one of the PS RBs initially.
LambeauPlain
September 03, 2024 at 11:16 am
Bares used a roster spot for Malcontent Marty Lewis? He was a juggernaut last year for them...snagging 4 passes. Probably kept him for his inspiring locker room presence.
Ugly Purple is seemingly going to make Jones into a workhorse? Raise your hand if you know the likely end result to that decision.
That other North team is going to be the rival again. I have a feeling the rivalry is going to be more outsized in the Motor City. That last season spanking stung in '23.
GregC
September 03, 2024 at 11:37 am
Why do you call him Malcontent Marty Lewis?
LambeauPlain
September 03, 2024 at 01:41 pm
My apologies to M. Lewis. I was thinking Marty Bennett when I commented.
Thanks Greg for alerting me to my mistake.
I hold Mr. Lewis in the highest regard. Great Packer!
Leatherhead
September 03, 2024 at 11:39 am
Since the merger in 1970 (53 years and counting) this was the SECOND time the Lions have made the Championship game. It was the first time in 30 years they won the division. So, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say this was the best season the Lions have had in a real long time.
Not only that, they were 30 minutes away from the Super Bowl when they choked up a massive, lion-sized furball. The architect of that collapse, Mighty Dan Campbell, is still calling the shots. Same staff, same QB, same players. In a better division than last year.
On Thanksgiving, the Lions could have stomped us out of existence. They were on their home field, a short week, etc. They had beaten us soundly earlier in the season. But the Packers had their act together by Thanksgiving, and won handily, forging a 17 point halftime lead. They never trailed in the game.
The Lions are Paper Tigers, IMO. Everything worked well for them last year, and they had their best season since the merger. That's not going to happen two years in a row. They aren't going to win the division, and if they have any bad luck, they could finish below the Bears and miss the playoffs.
GregC
September 03, 2024 at 12:44 pm
I don't see any reason why the Lions won't be as good as last year. They have one of the best O-lines in the league and a bunch of good skill players. Their defense is not as good, but again, I just don't see why they would be any worse this year. The Lions have steadily built up their team, and last year did not look like a fluke. It doesn't matter how they played in 1970 or even 2010. They've now got some people in charge who know how to run a football team.
Leatherhead
September 03, 2024 at 01:03 pm
I can give you two reasons: The Lions schedule is tougher this year. Packers are better. Bears are better. They open up against two playoff teams from last year, the Rams and Bucs. The also play the Seahawks and Cowboys before they play the Packers and Texans. All in the first 10 games......they aren't going to be 8-2 after 10 games, like last year.
Secondly, I have seen over and over that when a team has a massive collapse like the Lions did last year, they don't recover from it the next year. Look at the Packers after Bosticks Boner. Look at the Oilers after they collapsed against the Bills. Look at Atlanta, when they blew a big lead against the Patriots in the Super Bowl. None of those teams did as well the next year. Not only were none of those teams as good the next year, but none of them ever went to the Super Bowl after that.
Add in less luck with injuries than last year, and an odd bounce of the ball, and this is a 9-8 team. Maybe.
You think they have people in charge who know how to run a football team after ONE good year where they soiled themselves in the clutch. I'm not nearly as sure of that as you.
Bitternotsour
September 03, 2024 at 01:11 pm
All of those factors are unimpeachable, but the true reason they will fall back is that it's their DNA. they're the sad sack Lions and they will be forever so. scratch the surface of their fan base and they have paper bags with eye holes in their closet awaiting their ultimate fate.
13TimeChamps
September 03, 2024 at 01:07 pm
You haven't got the memo?
Players never change. Teams never change. Organizations never change. Whatever has happened in the past is destined to happen in the future. I think it's actually written in stone somewhere.
Just look at the Packers. They sucked the entire decade of the 70's. They sucked the entire decade of the 80's. They obviously were going to suck in the 90's, right?
No. They brought in new people to run the organization. Front office, coaching staff. Then they brought in more talented players. The entire culture changed. 25 years of futility turned into a long run of success.
Pittsburgh is another example. Before 1970, they were the doormats of the league for decades. Then they ran off 4 SBs in 6 years and have been a model franchise ever since. They changed the culture of the organization.
I've never understood people who are so rigid that they can't accept change. For one, I really hope GB doesn't take Detroit lightly.
Bitternotsour
September 03, 2024 at 01:13 pm
I'm with Leatherhead on this one. The Lions could bring in prime Belichick and they'd still turn back into the Lions.
Honestly, we're talking about generations of futility
13TimeChamps
September 03, 2024 at 02:29 pm
That's totally fine. You're certainly entitled to your opinion. I'm guessing many would agree with you. Probably more than would agree with me on this. But the Lions have got a taste of winning. I wouldn't be so sure they're just going to revert back to the same old Lions. We'll see I guess.
Brewcity_BearsFan
September 03, 2024 at 08:02 pm
You're not wrong about hangover affects, however I am curious why you think it would only plague Detroit, and not Green Bay?
Did the Packers not choke away the game much like the Lions? Wasn't it Jordon Love throwing across his body to a wide open Dre Greenlaw that sealed their fate?
The Lions are still a loaded roster. Dan Campbell is a good, albeit, unconventional coach, whose players genuinely seem to love playing for. You can't say that has always been the case with La Fluer.
The Lions weakness is their secondary. Their offense is arguably the best in the North. Hell one national writer is prediciting Goff to win MVP. They have the best pass rush, and best pass rusher.
Looking at least year's playoff teams, they seem least likely to drop off.
Bitternotsour
September 03, 2024 at 08:32 pm
DNA. The Packers have winning DNA. The Lions, well they are what they are. Keep your bag close by, you'll need it again.
Brewcity_BearsFan
September 03, 2024 at 09:19 pm
The Patriots once had "losing DNA". Teams can, and do change their histories.
I don't care one way or another. I am not a Lions fan. However, the insistance coming from some Packer fans that they will regress sounds like desperate hope. Definitely not in line with what you would expect from a fan base whose team has "winning DNA".
WorseWisconsin
September 04, 2024 at 08:04 pm
"the insistance coming from some Packer fans that they will regress ['"DNA"] sounds like desperate hope. "
EXACTLY.
Hey, I completely support rooting for your team, so I get the optimism. But here's what seems 'off' with cheeseheads...
I live in the SF Bay Area (not a 49ers fan, either), and lived in the area through the late 80s and 90s, peak 49er dominance. And many of the fans were as insufferable as what I see from Cheeseheads.
But the insufferable-ness was at least understandable: the '9ers won 5 Superbowls in that time.
In comparison, the Packers have 1 Superbowl in a quarter-century, and have a long track record of frequent regular-season success and coming up small in the post-season. There's the Packers DNA right there. Not the stuff of legend.
Bitternotsour
September 04, 2024 at 08:12 pm
Insufferability on a Packer fan specific website and board. I'll fetch you some smelling salts.
Titletown bitches.
GregC
September 03, 2024 at 11:41 am
Former Vikings QB Jaren Hall signed with the Seahawks practice squad. He was a fifth round pick last year. He struggled as a rookie but did better this preseason. Not good enough though.
Qoojo
September 03, 2024 at 01:24 pm
"Big Bob Tonyan did not make the 53 but did stay on the team via the practice squad."
I guess I have not paid much attention to practice squad limitations but i guess it's just an extra place to stash players given the amount of years Tonyan has. So I just googled it more and Josh McCown was the oldest PS player at 41
Coldworld
September 03, 2024 at 03:40 pm
Up to 6 can be vested veterans nowadays, if memory serves. 10 (11in our case with the international exception) of the players must be rookies or second year players.
Qoojo
September 04, 2024 at 11:21 am
I think it's kind of smart to use the international spot for kicker, as it seems the most likely position that might have some success.