Ask Maggie: LaFleurishing or LaFloundering?

Pieces are starting to fall into place in Green Bay. Jonathan Gannon is the team’s new defensive coordinator and the coaching staff is evolving. I can tell we’re getting into the offseason because we’re starting to get questions about the draft, which has me pretty excited. Let’s jump in: 

“It feels like, if this doesn’t go well, this will be LaFleur’s last chance at picking a DC. He must know that. Given that, what does his choice of Gannon say about him? My uninformed take: LaFleur went the safe route. Rather than taking a chance on an up-and-coming prospect who shows potential, he went with the experienced guy whose track record is mixed (he certainly didn’t get the job based on his past few years as HC in Arizona). But Gannon does have coordinator experience in ways that people like Leonhard or Harris didn’t have. I wonder if this reveals something about his decision-making. In a moment of high risk, is he more likely to tap the breaks than floor it. Just look at his coaching performance on offense with a lead in the second half of games. And I wonder if that reluctance was part of the reason there were people who thought we’ve already seen peak LaFleur. Just curious what you think.” - Jon

I’ve said it before about the LaFleur conversation, but I don’t fault anyone for feeling how they feel. There are people that are understandably frustrated by his last few seasons as a head coach, and if they aren’t excited he’s back, I can understand why they feel that way. Especially since it feels very much like a “run it back” kind of year where the only real changes happening to the coaching staff are changes made out of necessity (like Hafley getting a job elsewhere). I had hoped for a little bit more of a shake up to the status quo. 

But I do think Gannon’s head coaching experience absolutely mattered to LaFleur. I don’t necessarily think he approached it thinking it’s a make or break decision, but I think he values an experienced voice to lead the other side of the ball so he can focus his efforts on the offense. Mike Pettine was a McCarthy holdover, but he had previous head coaching experience. Joe Barry is the only outlier from the LaFleur tenure, but he did have multiple stints as a defensive coordinator and worked with LaFleur on the Rams staff in 2017. Hafley had head coaching experience, too, albeit at the college level. So it made sense that LaFleur would want someone experienced to handle business on that side of the ball. If he had hired someone like Leonhard or Harris, he probably would have felt the need to be much more involved in defensive meetings (I’m not saying this is the right way to operate, just that I’d imagine this was a factor). He won’t have those concerns with Gannon. 

I’m not sure I’m willing to make much of a connection beyond that. As in, I don’t think this hire is indicative of who LaFleur is with the game on the line. If anything, I think the hope here is that Gannon can take the reins defensively and let LaFleur focus his efforts on things like making those better second-half adjustments on offense. That’s arguably why I’ve been hoping we’ll see some changes to the offensive coaching staff, too. We’ll dive into a question about this at the end, but some new perspectives on offense feel just as needed as the new perspectives on defense. It doesn’t sound like those changes are forthcoming, though, aside from LaFleur losing his quarterbacks coach. 

“Does Gute go CB and OL/DL heavy in the draft?” - Hank 

The Packers are looking at eight picks in this year’s draft, despite not having a first-round selection. If I had to give a very rough guess as to how they spend those picks, here’s what my guess would be, in no order: CB (1), OL (2), DL (1), EDGE (1), LB (1), RB (1), QB (1). So that wouldn’t necessarily lend itself to going “heavy” anywhere. But here’s why I think that way. 

I don’t think cornerback is going to be as high on Gutekunst’s radar as we the fans want it to be. The Packers spent some significant money to bring in Nate Hobbs last offseason. He’s likely a starting corner this upcoming season. For what it’s worth, if Gannon plays more three-high safety looks and uses more dime personnel, I didn’t think Hobbs looked bad in the slot. Boundary corner, though, is clearly the weak link of the secondary. I’d like to see a day two pick used on a CB, but again, I’m not convinced Gutekunst agrees. It’s worth noting that both Nixon and Valentine are free agents after next season, so the Packers should be looking for a future starter even if they don’t want him to be a Week 1 starter this season. Could this be like the 2024 season where Green Bay took three safeties to just completely overhaul the room? Yes. It wouldn’t surprise me. But I think that might happen next year when Nixon and Valentine are presumably off the roster. 

As far as the big guys on both sides of the line, I think nose tackle is a must to make this defense operate the way we envision Gannon wanting it to. Nose tackle is my favorite position in football, probably because I watched BJ Raji in some of my most formative football years. So give me a NT in the second or third round and I won’t give a hoot about the rest of the draft (just kidding, I still very much will). But yes, I think the Packers definitely prioritize bolstering the d-line in this draft, despite the depth they have there. Depth pieces are great, but depth doesn’t always translate to “guy I want to play 50% of snaps.” They need more talent in a space-eater next to Devonte Wyatt. I know I only took one in my prediction, but I think they spend a high pick here and get someone they plan to start this season. They’ll fill in the rest of the snaps with their depth pieces. 

The o-line is interesting because we assume they want Jordan Morgan to be LT, Zach Tom is locked in at RT, and then the interior is kind of a mystery. Aaron Banks was another high profile free agent signing in 2025, so he likely stays at LG (and I thought he played better once he got healthy). Then the Packers need to figure out their future at center. Does Sean Rhyan come back for the Spotrac estimate of around $6.5 million per year? What happens with Elgton Jenkins once he’s healthy? Is he a cap casualty? He’s entering the last year of his deal this year. Would they keep him and kick him back to RG? Does Jacob Monk enter the competition at center? And then there’s Anthony Belton, who probably fits best as Green Bay’s swing tackle as the roster currently stands (unless he’s in the competition with Morgan at LT). I think the Packers will draft at least two offensive linemen because it’s just something they historically do. But I don’t think it’ll be a top priority given some of the recent investments they’ve already made. 

“Hey Maggie! Are you at all concerned about the potential “brain drain” coming this year from all the folks leaving 1265? Between (seemingly) half the defensive staff headed to Miami, another QB coach gone after just 1 year, as well as additional support staff (Sully, Campy, Hackett), it just seems like an incredible amount of turnover. Granted, their replacements are no slouches, but I don’t recall this many new faces, outside of a head coaching change. Curious of your thoughts…” - Jim

I’d argue some Packers fans are excited about a brain drain. But in all seriousness, there are certainly good coaches and good football minds that have walked out the door. I’ll miss Jon-Eric Sullivan’s pressers during the draft. I always enjoyed hearing him evaluate prospects. Jordan Love moving onto yet another QB coach isn’t the most ideal scenario, but we don’t know what the rest of this staff is going to look like just yet. And certain voices leaving gives LaFleur a great opportunity to refresh his own strategy and vision (which, again, I know a lot of Packers fans are clamoring for). Gannon wasn’t my top candidate for defensive coordinator, but the more I dive into some of his past defenses, the more excited I am about what he’ll do with the pieces he has in Green Bay. 

The optimistic take here (which is who I tend to be) is that LaFleur knows this team needs to make a deep playoff push. The Wild Card round isn’t going to be good enough in 2026. So much to Jon’s point in the first question, he’s got a lot on the line with every new voice that comes into 1265. And like I said at the top of this, I wish there were more new voices on offense. This is an opportunity to make the necessary changes that’ll get this team over that playoff hump. For what it’s worth, I really, really like the hires of Bobby Babich (defensive pass game coordinator) and Sam Siefkes (linebackers coach). 

As always, thank you all for engaging with the mailbag. We’re a month in already with no signs of slowing down. Hopefully we can keep this thing going all offseason. Send your questions to [email protected] and let’s talk football.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Maggie Loney is a writer for Cheesehead TV and podcaster for Pack's What She Said. Find her on Bluesky at @MaggieJLoney.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (38)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
splitpea1's picture

January 31, 2026 at 02:17 pm

I totally agree that we need more talent out of the NT position or so-called space eater. This philosophy where we always try to plug the need on Day 3 is erroneous (same with CBs); once in a while you can be lucky and get away with it, but you want prime time talent if it's available. Think Vita Vea or Dexter Lawrence if you want to start making your interior defense a strength--they're worth the high draft capital.

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

January 31, 2026 at 04:20 pm

Vita Vea - 12th player selected in 2018. Hard to get the studs when you're picking late almost every year because you have a good team every year.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

January 31, 2026 at 06:09 pm

We didn't have a chance to draft Vea, but Lawrence was selected a few spots after Gary and has recorded roughly a third more defensive snaps.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

February 01, 2026 at 07:29 am

And then when you do pick high you pick a guy with a questionable motor from Michigan and a guy who didn’t start one game at Iowa.

0 points
0
0
davekenya's picture

January 31, 2026 at 04:17 pm

DT is probably the highest GB draft priority - all things being equal. Three reasons:
* The position itself is in the 'top tier' of importance (along with Edge Rusher on D and QB/LT on O)
* Devonte Wyatt is currently on a 1-year contract. GB will want to draft someone who could potentially replace him should the Pack not be able to reach a (reasonable) contract extension -- i.e. they need to protect themselves at that position.
* Wyatt is recovering from injury. You want insurance and someone to in-fill should Wyatt not be at top form at the start of the season. (Wyatt could start on PUP; you want enough talent at DT to succeed until his return)
So, lots of reasons.

I follow Jon's reasoning/intuition about MLF and how his personality exhibits (...'In a moment of high risk, is he more likely to tap the breaks than floor it...').

I say 'yes'.

To me, MLF seems 'passive' in letting the game come to him rather than striving to dictate it's outcomes himself. This displays itself in ways I interpret as 'cautious' and 'indecisive' rather than the inverse.

One possibility for the way MLF operates may be due to (continually) having a very young roster where a HC may need to be more 'hesitant' in being directive...as his players won't properly know how to execute...or MLF may (rightly?) feel less confident a younger player will know what to do in a given situation...so MLF needs to be (cautiously) thinking more 'how can I put this guy in a situation to be successful?' than so with a veteran player who would more know how to do that himself. Think: AR's reluctance to throw to young WRs who may not run the right audible route, etc...and extend this same hesitancy/reluctance to coaching/directing an entire team!

Does this play out with his coaching staffs as well?

When LaFleur was first hired in 2019, he chose to retain Mike Pettine (a holdover from the Mike McCarthy era) rather than bringing in his own guy immediately. While the defense was serviceable, it fell apart in back-to-back NFC Championship games (giving up 37 points to the 49ers and the infamous "Scotty Miller" touchdown to the Bucs). LaFleur eventually moved on from Pettine in 2021, but again, critics argued the move could have happened a year sooner.

DC Barry was eventually fired in January 2024, but the general feeling was that the decision came a full year too late, potentially wasting a year of the team's competitive window after underwhelming defensive performances throughout the 2022 and 2023 seasons.

ST coaches: LaFleur hired Shawn Mennenga based on a recommendation from Mike Pettine and kept him for two mediocre seasons (2019–2020). Instead of looking outside the organization after firing Mennenga, LaFleur promoted assistant Maurice Drayton. This led to the disastrous 2021 special teams unit that was directly responsible for the playoff loss to the 49ers (blocked punt).

And now we've been riding Bisaccia since 2022 and we've been seeing the results. While metrics consistently ranked the unit near the bottom of the league (20th–30th depending on the source), the internal "self-scout" message from Head Coach Matt LaFleur and Coordinator Rich Bisaccia was that the unit was fundamentally sound but victimized by "catastrophic anomalies." LaFleur told reporters, "I think our teams have done a pretty good job, especially if you look at our coverage units… we're sound in what we do." He argued that a handful of "disaster plays" (blocked kicks) overshadowed consistent performance.

Matt LaFleur values continuity and culture over quick fixes with his coaches. To him, firing a coach seems a last resort, not a spark plug. To the fanbase, this often looks like 'tapping the brakes' or an inability to identify under-performance until it has already cost the team a(nother) playoff run.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 01, 2026 at 01:05 pm

Packers fans forget that when it comes to hiring assistants the H.C. in Green Bay doesn't get to pay like other teams in the past. Are they changing that? With the hire of Gannon I am starting to think they are. How far that goes down the line is yet to be seen. From what I have heard Pettine wasn't so much retained by MLF but it was strongly suggested he keep him. No defense for Barry and I said the the day they announced that horrible hire. MLF has squawked as others before him about not being able to pay for the best because the Packers feel they can go cheap there.

For ST I have been told for about 4 coaches now this is the one that will fix it all. Bisaccia is a respect ST coach in this league who has had success. I laughed when he was hired and fans will be calling for his head in a few years. Maybe firing the coaches isn't the cure all and sometimes it isn't the coaches fault. Players never look at the player who didn't execute, it was the coaches fault he didn't execute. Good coaches get fired all the time because the player missed his assignment.

0 points
0
0
davekenya's picture

February 01, 2026 at 02:54 pm

.

0 points
0
0
davekenya's picture

February 01, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Yes, I very much agree with you, Bucky, that this was likely true - especially early in MLF's tenure I think GB did underpay assistants. Some of this was speculated to be because:

The Packers often filled vacant assistant roles by promoting from within (e.g., hiring an assistant offensive line coach to be the receivers coach) rather than conducting expensive national searches for established names.

Recent studies show that Packers assistants often had significantly less "outside experience" than staffs of other playoff teams, a strategy frequently used to keep payroll lower.In recent years, the Packers have decisively shifted away from their "frugal" reputation.

While the Packers were historically conservative with assistant pay, they are currently in the middle of a "spending arms race." They have moved from being a "draft and develop" staff to one that is willing to pay $4M–$5M for a coordinator to ensure they remain competitive. Does this payscale 'trickle down'? Not sure - I don't have that detail. As publicly owned, we can look up GB staff salaries, but can't compare them to other teams as that info isn't publicly available.

Defensive Coordinator Salary Comparison (Est. 2025)

Coach Team Est. Salary Status
Vic Fangio Eagles $4.5M – $5M benchmark for DC pay.
Jeff Hafley GB $4M – $4.5M matched his $4M BC salary
Matt Eberflus Dallas $4M
Steve Spagnuolo KC $3.5M – $5M Recently extended; 2024 base + bonuses. This guy is underpaid!
Average NFL DC Various $1M – $1.5M The "middle class" of NFL assistants.

I don't know what Gannon got, but it has apparently been close to 'resetting the market' according to some sources...

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

January 31, 2026 at 07:31 pm

If Gute can pick up a Legit Starters: Vet OL / Vet DL / Vet CB/ ....and draft 2 of each and a TE...we should be okay to move up in the playoffs and possibly contend. OH...and ML play / Love throw to Golden....we'll be okay...GPG

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

February 01, 2026 at 08:36 am

So, why did Gute let Diggs walk? He was a Vet DB.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 01, 2026 at 12:48 pm

Who made is rep on one good year getting INTs which where largely based on luck. The can't cover anyone.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

February 01, 2026 at 01:16 pm

There's no room under the cap for a $15M contract for a guy who's struggled the last year or two and especially in zone. They needed a body. They tried him out against the Vikes. They apparently didn't like him enough to play him against Chicago. They might still bring him back under a new deal for less money, but he doesn't seem to be a good fit for the defenses the Packers have been running.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

February 02, 2026 at 08:27 am

You are right, there was no way we were taking on that contract, even if we would have liked to keep him. Form his perspective why negotiate down at this point? Nothing to lose from his by being a FA at this time of year. For us, there is navigating one the cap bar at the start of the League year to consider.

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

February 01, 2026 at 04:05 pm

He would have been due a 15 mill CAP hit to stay in GB who is over the CAP until they shake loose Gary and Jenkins and the CAP went up 20 Mill also. Should have 45-50 Mill to sign players either home grown or FA's.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

February 02, 2026 at 08:51 am

Nowhere close to that number. Really good cap article on APC that puts the available cap number around $11MM after setting aside needed money for new draft class, RFA and ERFA money, performance bonuses, operating room for 2026 season, etc. etc.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 01, 2026 at 12:56 pm

This roster doesn't need a ton and I think if healthy as good as the team favored to play in next week.

They have offensive weapons and I would say the only area there would be interior linemen which can be had later in the draft. They get better run blocking (the reason the team failed in the playoff game) this offense will hum next year.

On defense I would look to add a big body up front to help vs the run. I love the Parson trade but he is light in the pants as Vic Ketchman would say. Hopefully can get a DT in the 2nd or 3rd and the front 7 will be fine. Safeties are good and I think I would draft with late picks are few CBs and RBs (Jacobs is showing wear) to keep the groups competitive young.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 01, 2026 at 01:11 pm

I agree the roster is pretty good. I'd like to agree about the run blocking being the reason we lost in the playoffs, but those 25 points in the 4th quarter keep distracting me. We could get a starting caliber LT in the second round, and that would protect us against injury or poor play by Morgan. AND, if needed, he could play LT while Morgan filled in elsewhere.

Here's our DT situation: Wyatt, of course. Then we have Wooden and Brooks, and Stackhouse, and Brinson, and Riley. I think the Packers are thinking/hoping that Stackhouse and Brinson will be better next year, and that Wyatt will be more available.

Brinson actually looks like a keeper to me. He put some pretty good stuff on film this year and I could see him having a much bigger part next season.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 01, 2026 at 04:50 pm

What is the best way to protect a lead? You run the ball. The whole 2nd half the OL got no push and the run game couldn't net any positive runs. If they could have gotten a couple of 1st downs running the ball it would have been game over. Couple that with Love taking 2 very stupid grounding penalties and now the Bears are getting too many chances with good field position. Everyone want to blame the coaches for that loss but it was 100% on the players. Parson's was correct when he said at some point the players need to go out there and win the game. The coaches put them in position to win and they dropped the ball.

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

February 01, 2026 at 11:02 pm

2-DE / 2-DL / 2-CB / 2-OL

0 points
0
0
ArlenWilliams's picture

January 31, 2026 at 11:47 pm

If the 2026 Packers coaching staff were a movie, it might be Revenge of the Nerds.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

February 01, 2026 at 07:32 am

No, they’ve already done that , we’re on Revenge of the Nerds III at this point.

0 points
0
0
harleycops's picture

February 01, 2026 at 10:31 am

Why has GB lost so many coordinators and coaches? Were we that good that teams wants our coaches OR do these coaches figure GB is going nowhere fast after losing 5 in a row? It begs the question and commands an answer. Don't know if Mannion is the huge loss that writers say he is, but time wil tell about Leonhard / Gannon. PackerNation will monitor that closely and depending how that goes, the temperature will rise or fall in the LaFleuzy office. I hope we aren't saying after a month into the season: "See what defense we could have had with JL as our DC?"

Incidentally, a Buffalo sports writer said this: "When Brady was hired as the head coach, the biggest immediate task was to find a solid defensive coordinator that could help the defense. He knocked this hiring out of the park with Leonhard." Another wrote: "This will be the hire of the year!" Don't hear that about Gannon. Hmmm?

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 01, 2026 at 12:29 pm

I wish Leonard all the luck in the world and hope he thrives. If he does he will be a H.C. candidate because he just took on what I would have judged the hardest of the coordinator positions. He enters that job on the hot seat.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 01, 2026 at 01:13 pm

A good question. The working assumption was that LaFleur didn't have the ability to develop a staff, and that none of our assistants were very good. Obviously false, of course.

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

February 01, 2026 at 04:13 pm

Mannions work with Willis is what I believe has shown others something....When reality IS Willis found a team with a pretty good support group he did not have in Tenn. Which is why most QB's struggle when going to a poorly constructed team. GB has a lot of holes but the offense is still more complete than the Defense.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

February 01, 2026 at 05:45 pm

"Incidentally, a Buffalo sports writer said this: "When Brady was hired as the head coach, the biggest immediate task was to find a solid defensive coordinator that could help the defense. He knocked this hiring out of the park with Leonhard." Another wrote: "This will be the hire of the year!" Don't hear that about Gannon. Hmmm?"

A Buffalo sports writer, you say? Man, I haven't seen anything like that about Gannon from anyone covering the Packers. "Hmmm" is right!

https://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/the-dc-hire-that-could-push-green-bay-to-t...

https://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/jonathan-gannon-brings-experience-to-super...

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

February 02, 2026 at 08:38 am

We lost Hafley, who has taken a number of his hires with him. We hired Gannon who seems to have negotiated to bring his people, displacing others Gafley hadn’t taken. The exception was Mannion on offense. Mannion was tipped as a riser and to move up, but the way is blocked here. He got a lot of the credit for Willis’ preparation in league circles.

Almost all of these coaches were with us for 2 seasons (including Mannion). They were not long time Packers. Almost all are due to losing Hafley and Gannon bringing his own people in.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 01, 2026 at 12:41 pm

I wish Leonard the best and hope he thrives in Buffalo. I will be the first to admit I didn't think he would draw that much attention in the musical chairs go around this off season but it appears he was on the radar of a few teams. With that said he sat down on a hot seat there in Buffalo. If he thrives teams will be asking about him as a H.C. or he will be the sacrificial lamb.

The fanbase is starved for a title in Buffalo and the coach they hired will have to prove immediately that he isn't more of the same. The offense always scored in Buffalo so the first guy Brady will be shoving under the bus if his seat gets hot will be the D.C. if they aren't looking better immediately. They just fired a coach who was possibly a fluke play away from being in the Super Bowl (I think Buffalo beats the Pats) so the owner and fanbase will show very little patience for this new coaching regime.

Factor in the prevailing thought in Buffalo is that they need to get more help around Josh Allen so don't expect them to concentrate on defense in the draft even though they probably should. If they are paying Allen and going to be drafting there as well that leaves Leonard scrapping for his players. The new coach usually doesn't get pound the table for his picks or roster concerns. It will be go get the job done kid.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 01, 2026 at 01:16 pm

Buffalo has a problem called the Patriots. They couldn't break through when the Patriots were down, and that window has closed. They play in a division with the Jets and Dolphins, two traditionally poorly run, weak teams, so you're almost guaranteed second place.

I'm going to be very interested in what happens in Buffalo, because they did what many here wanted: Fire a good coach because he hasn't won a Super Bowl. We'll see what happens.

0 points
0
0
davekenya's picture

February 01, 2026 at 03:17 pm

Good insight, Leather...Buffalo and Pack HCs were/are indeed in very similar places with their teams. Some of the main differences into why Buffalo moved on from McD while Green Bay extended MLF seem to be:

The Josh Allen Window: With Josh Allen in his prime and having won an MVP in 2024, the front office rationalized they couldn't afford to waste more years with a coaching staff that seemed stuck. For MLF, Jordan Love's still 'young' and not in the same career place. The Packers viewed LaFleur as essential to Jordan Love’s continued ascent. Management feared that a coaching change would disrupt Love’s rhythm just as he was establishing himself as one of the league's elite passers. Interesting, I read this to mean Love's more 'fragile' than Allen is in establishing himself as top QB...

The Joe Brady Factor: Offensive Coordinator Joe Brady had become a rising star. To avoid losing him to another team, the Bills promoted him to head coach shortly after McDermott’s firing to maximize Allen’s offensive potential. If GB's defense had played stellar (say Parsons and Wyatt stay healthy), doe Hafley look like the rising star GB doesn't want to lose and he gets promoted to GB HC?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

February 02, 2026 at 08:47 am

All very nice, but the real reason seems to be more of a GM power move intended to at the same time buy time for himself with the owner and fans. By going this way he is selling fresh air, reinvigoration and a need for time for these exciting new minds to shape a new future. Under his guidance of course. Machiavelli would be proud. Whether the fans will be is unclear, but it’s undoubtedly bought the GM time. He was smart enough that, before this, he was sitting on a powder keg with a fuse lit and burning.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

February 02, 2026 at 09:50 am

Occam's razor

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

February 01, 2026 at 02:07 pm

it'll be interesting to see how successful Gannon can be with the lack of talent given to him by Gutekunst (no DL, no CB's, questionable LB). He'll have Micah for half a year which will help, but there's some serious questions elsewhere (including the OL).

0 points
0
0
davekenya's picture

February 01, 2026 at 03:21 pm

...and it seems normal for a team with a new DC to adopt to that new system...and for the DC to understand each players' strengths and how to best utilize them in his system. The 'growing pains/learning curve' will be somewhat settled right when Parsons and Wyatt are fully back from their injuries...which would seem to indicate a stronger second half of season D than first half season D

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 01, 2026 at 04:52 pm

The defense has talent. Their should be no drop off, if anything they should improve. Maybe he can get more out of LVN and Gary.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

February 02, 2026 at 09:52 am

Objectively looking at the season, does anyone believe Gary was healthy. Looked to me like he was running on guts and fumes.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

February 02, 2026 at 10:08 am

Something definitely seemed off about Gary, but there was never an official injury report or even a hint from some reporter that Gary had an injury. Maybe it wasn't physical but something in his personal life that caused him to be distracted or unmotivated. Hard for us to actually know what was going on. I suspect the team has a much better idea of what the cause of his decline was. Whether the keep him or cut him will tell us something about the team's evaluation.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

February 02, 2026 at 10:01 am

With both Nixon and Valentine up for new contracts after next year, wouldn't Gute's standard move be to draft one or more CBs this year as a backstop to losing one or both of them? He drafted Morgan two years before Tom and Walker came up for renewal, drafted Golden the year before Doubs and Watson came up for renewal, drafted Gary and LVN before the Smith's came up for renewal, etc. etc.

I think Gute goes heavy on CB this year since he only has Hobbs under contract after next season.

0 points
0
0