Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - You Feel a Draft In Here?
The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.
By JerseyAl

Congratulations to the Green Bay Packers Organization and the city of Green Bay and surrounding areas for pulling off what many thought was not possible. From all indications and reports,draft week in Green Bay was a rousing success. Lambeau hosted a total of SIX TIMES the population of Green Bay over the three days of the draft. And as is the Wisconsin way, no one ran out of beer or brats! A huge success!
Now some post-draft thoughts...
The focus on wide receiver and pass rush help seemed obvious, but I was surprised that cornerback wasn't addressed earlier. Obviously, the Packers like their cornerback room better than most fans. I think they have a lot of options and different ways they can go with their existing personnel and are going to lean on not being predictable as a core strength of that unit.
My draft crush was unequivocally DT Kenneth Grant. But despite the "consensus" boards claiming he should be available around when the Packers picked, I told you all he would go in the teens, Sure enough, the Dolphins grabbed him with pick 13. He's going to be a beast for the Dolphins.
Speaking of "consensus," you all surely know that every team has their own board and these boards can all be very different based on what the organization values in a prospect. Give me a consensus board that is an amalgamation of the 32 team boards, and then I'll take it as an excellent prediction of where players will be drafted. The whole consensus board thing is a big reason why I only do one mock draft - I just pick players I like and try to guess when they'll get drafted - usually pretty poorly!
As for the Packers draft picks...
Matthew Golden - It was my belief that he was the second-best WR in the draft after Tet McMillan and the only other one worth a first-round pick. I'm beyond thrilled that Gutey broke the streak and what a special moment to have Mark Murphy make the announcement in front of thousands of raucous Packers fans.
Anthony Belton - I was impressed with Belton when I scouted him for the draft guide. I was confident in his movement ability for such a big man, but I tempered my Belton analysis as I was unsure if the Packers signing a big guard like Aaron Banks was a new trend or just a one-off. When the Packers took Belton, I joked on twitter that the Packers signing Banks and drafting Belton was an obvious attempt to punish the NFL for not banning the tush push by building an Eagles-type offensive line and becoming the best at it. Anyway, here's what I wrote about Belton:
After two years at Georgia Military Academy, Belton joined the Wolfpack, where he started at left tackle for two and a half seasons. Belton flashes above-average feet and surprising overall quickness for a long and wide-framed player his teammates nicknamed “Escalade.” Belton is a right tackle mauler-type yet gets off quickly at the snap with good burst and straight-line agility. He excelled in NC State’s inside zone scheme, showing surprising mobility for his size. Belton is the proverbial large block of clay that you hope to mold into something special, but is he the Packers’ type of clay? He also had a problem with penalties, drawing 24 flags during his time at NC State.
Although Belton played left tackle in college, I viewed him as more of right tackle/guard type for the Packers and I do believe he needs a year of technique work before attaining NFL-starter level as a tackle. Many people are thinking he'll compete with Sean Rhyan for the RG spot this year, but I feel like he's more likely to serve as a G/T backup this season.The Packers are going to be signing Zach Tom to a big extension this year, so perhaps 2026 holds a move to LT for Tom with Belton taking over at RT? It's possible.
Savion Williams - This was the shocker of the Packers' draft for me. While I expected them to double-dip at wide receiver, twice in their first three picks was not on my bingo card (or Gutey's from what he said in his presser). What also surprises me is that Williams does a lot of the things we assumed they signed Mecole Hardman to do. Then again, Hardman was likely a one-year rental and they can move on from him without much financial loss - an easy decision if your rookie shows he can handle the job.
Barryn Sorrell - Well, just like the Packers drafting a first-round WR in front of their hometown fans, the NFL script writers did a hell of a job with this one. Kid pays his way to Green Bay with his family just to experience the draft, sticks around in the Green Room for day three, gets picked by the Packers, gets announced by Goodell, goes outside to celebrate with the fans and holds a tear-jerker of a press conference. Damn those NFL script writers are good!
Collin Oliver - This pick is pretty interesting. He's played linebacker and EDGE and the Packers are looking at him as an EDGE first. He's a very different EDGE than what they normally look for - smaller in size and one reliant on speed. To this I say, finally! Sure he's likely to be limited to DPR status at first (designated pass rusher), but what's wrong with having a different tool in your toolbox when the occasion calls for it? If he can contribute on special teams, which is the expectation, he could be well worth a roster spot.
Warren Brinson - Somebody needed to replace the beef TJ Slaton provided, and Brinson has plenty of beef. He is a bit if a different big body DT than Slaton, however. Brinson is more of a penetrator and disruptor, one that can push the pocket. It's what Hafley prefers in his interior defensive linemen, but will the run defense take a hit because of that?
Micah Robinson - Gutey has found seventh-round cornerback success with Carrington Valentine - can history repeat with this pick? Of course, the odds are very much against it. Robinson was not invited to the combine and received only one top-30 visit (from the Packers). He may even have gone undrafted, but likely one of the Packers' scouts saw something in Robinson and pounded the table for Gutey to pick him.
John Williams - Like the Valentine/Robinson comparison above, the Packers may be hoping to find their next Rasheed Walker with the drafting of Williams. Williams fell just outside my top-25 for offensive tackles, whereas Walker was my 12th-rated tackle in 2022. I thought Walker had all the tools necessary to play tackle in the NFL and I just didn't see that in Williams. The Packers had a 5th-6th round grade on Williams, so obviously they saw some things this armchair scout didn't.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
__________________________




Comments (106)
TKWorldWide
April 30, 2025 at 06:51 am
Just curious about straight line agility. I always thought agility referred to the ability to change directions.
Like most of us here, can’t wait to see these guys in action!
PackEyedOptimist
April 30, 2025 at 07:01 am
:-D
I wondered about that too!
mnbadger
April 30, 2025 at 07:33 am
I stopped to think about it too.
An ability to quickly juke left or right while otherwise driving straight to the target - my best guess.
GPG
Cheezehead72
April 30, 2025 at 08:36 am
According to the internet, straight line agility is the ability to move quickly and efficiently in a straight line, without changing direction.
TKWorldWide
April 30, 2025 at 09:07 am
What’s the shortest distance between two points?
Cheezehead72
April 30, 2025 at 09:14 am
A short story
Bitternotsour
April 30, 2025 at 09:30 am
you win the Vonnegut prize
dobber
April 30, 2025 at 09:36 am
On the curved surface of the earth, it's a secant.
TKWorldWide
April 30, 2025 at 09:45 am
On a related note, I’d like to secant my earlier testimony.
barutanseijin
April 30, 2025 at 02:45 pm
The secant is the shortest distance if you’re tunneling. On the surface, the shortest distance is an arc.
TKWorldWide
April 30, 2025 at 03:09 pm
Check with Joan. Or Noah.
dobber
May 01, 2025 at 08:35 am
That was a MOST triumphant movie reference, Dude!
LLCHESTY
April 30, 2025 at 11:57 pm
So you're saying Oliver is going to be good? Awesome!
dblbogey
April 30, 2025 at 12:30 pm
My house and my Mother in laws house?
TKWorldWide
April 30, 2025 at 05:35 pm
You must be a saint!
davekenya
April 30, 2025 at 06:23 pm
And as we all know (from getting sucked into listening to past AR pressers), the shortest distance between two points within a black hole is generally defined by a geodesic, which is the equivalent of a straight line in curved spacetime
TKWorldWide
May 01, 2025 at 07:35 am
Hells yeah, brutha!
SicSemperTyrannis
May 01, 2025 at 09:54 pm
Josh Jacobs
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 09:30 am
I always thought burst and explosion were the measures for straight line athleticism.
Bitternotsour
April 30, 2025 at 01:25 pm
Dear Penthouse letters,
It was the summer after my high school graduation and I'd always thought burst and explosion were the measures for straight line athleticism, little did I know that my temporary pool cleaning job would teach me a new set of definitions...
dobber
May 01, 2025 at 08:36 am
WINNER!!!
JerseyAl
April 30, 2025 at 12:16 pm
To me, it means a few things - he's not a plodder, he runs with athleticism and is able to make direction adjustments on the move, with few wasted steps. This has nothing to do with side-to-side lateral movement, where he is not as agile.
Hope that makes sense,
dblbogey
April 30, 2025 at 12:35 pm
I always look forward to your articles Al. Good, informative, interesting stuff. I watched 2-3 of Barryn Sorrell's press conferences/interviews and I wish he was my neighbor. What a wonderfully genuine human and good man.
TKWorldWide
April 30, 2025 at 05:37 pm
Sounds good to me, amigo! I appreciate all the work that goes into what you guys do!
PackEyedOptimist
April 30, 2025 at 06:55 am
A few thoughts bouncing around in my cranium.
John Williams is an aerospace engineering student; maybe he was a little more invested in his classwork than most NFL prospects, and now that he can focus on his new career, he will make some big technique jumps.
Collin Oliver: I "picked" Jaheed Campbell with our #53; Oliver is kind of a poor-man's Campbell. It will be fun to watch a pass rusher with true bend--when was our last one? Clay Matthews? Kabeer Gbaja Biamila?
Hopefully we didn't cast our pick #124 on "barren soil." (sorry) In truth, he wasn't on my radar, and seems like an interesting addition. Maybe he becomes an Aaron Kampmann type, a lunch-pail guy who far exceeds people's expectations. That would be awesome.
Since I regularly picked Savion Williams with pick #87, the only "surprise" was that Gutey agreed with me! The last time that happened was with AJ Dillon--hopefully this one works out better... I really see a potential Randy Moss/Eric Dickerson blend in him. He MAY bust, but his ceiling is sky-high. He was used oddly at TCU, so everything depends on how he is coached and used (and how he adapts to it) in Green Bay.
Brinson reminds me of the Colby Wooden pick--sort of a sketchy tweener, at least as far as his play style...
Belton's tape is interesting; he doesn't always look good doing it, but he gets the job done. Those guys sometimes bust when up against NFL opposition...fingers crossed.
Bitternotsour
April 30, 2025 at 09:32 am
used oddly at TCU is redundant
dobber
May 01, 2025 at 08:39 am
Yeah, maybe this is the draft where a TCU WR is picked and actually becomes a pro difference maker.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 09:39 am
Wooden was a 278 pound DE who was not very effective as an outside rusher in college and thought to be better suited to being an interior penetrator and he had increasingly been used as a 3T. His pass rush was more potential than actual though despite his athleticism.
He’s since bulked up a bit, but he’s never managed to match his tested athleticism with production and his run game work has, if anything, declined. He was an athletic potential over production pick that so far has not worked out. Can the new coach salvage him? Maybe that’s a factor, but I don’t really see a parallel with the 315 pound Brinson.
Alberta_Packer
April 30, 2025 at 11:55 am
Brinson not a parallel to Wooden. However his replacement.
PackEyedOptimist
April 30, 2025 at 11:59 am
I get that. My point was that he, like Wooden, isn't physically a match for his play style.
Brinson is built like a run-stopper, but isn't good at that.
GregC
April 30, 2025 at 07:08 am
The Packers broke several precedents in this draft. It started with the wide receiver in the first round. I never thought it was an actual policy for them not to draft a receiver in the first round, because that would've been ridiculous, but 23 years is a long time. Also, Matthew Golden is smaller than usual for a Packers outside receiver. I wasn't sure he was on their board. I'm glad he was.
Anthony Belton is well beyond the usual weight threshold for a Packers draft pick. He was even mentioned in the CheeseheadTV Draft Guide article, "They Won't Be Packers," due to his weight. Savion Williams is a receiver with an unusual skill set. I don't remember the Packers drafting anyone like him, not even in the later rounds.
Collin Oliver is way smaller than any player the Packers have used at edge in recent years. I'm not sure how they are going to fit him onto the roster. They already have five DEs, plus they drafted Barryn Sorrell. Even if they go with six DEs, which they could get away with if Oliver plays special teams, they will have to cut one of the others. Cox? Enagbare? Sorrell? I guess I would say Enagbare, but is it worth cutting him for a pass rushing specialist and special teams player? That could be a tough decision.
Finally, the seventh round CB, Micah Robinson, is undersized at 183 pounds. He's just a seventh round pick, but still not their usual kind of CB.
dobber
April 30, 2025 at 09:00 am
"I don't remember the Packers drafting anyone like him, not even in the later rounds."
The closest guy I can come up with is Ty Montgomery in round 3 in 2015. He was not nearly as dynamic as Savion Williams but probably a more skilled football player--comparatively speaking--at the time of his draft.
" I'm not sure how they are going to fit him onto the roster."
With Sorrell and Oliver, and now the addition of Simmons, the battle for roster spots in the front 7 is going to be rough. If I'm Kristian Welch or Arron Mosby--maybe even Ty'ron Hopper or Colby Wooden--I'm thinking I really need to bring it in OTAs and training camp.
" I guess I would say Enagbare, "
At this point, about half the depth chart projections out there list LVN as the DE starter across from Gary, and half list Enagbare. Enagbare wasn't special last season, but he's a capable NFL player. I don't know if the Packers can afford to sign him when his contract expires after 2025, so that might shape how they handle him. There's a lot about Sorrell that's reminiscent of Enagbare. Sorrell tested better...Enagbare with better length.
"He's just a seventh round pick, but still not their usual kind of CB."
Over the last year or two, the "not the usual" has become the usual comment. We're watching the roster--and likely, the general roster-building philosophy--evolving in real time. It might be the story of the off-season.
PeteK
April 30, 2025 at 09:44 am
Brenton Cox is the riser in the pass rush category as he performed well later in the season.
dobber
April 30, 2025 at 09:51 am
He didn't get a chance until P. Smith was dealt: 4 sacks in 7 games.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 10:06 am
If he sustains the level he achieved on just under 70 rushing snaps over a handful of regular season games late, he’d have finished the year with 15+ sacks. He also held up pretty well versus the run. Even if there is some drop off, the potential to approach 10 sacks a year as a rotational player means Cox is not going anywhere. No team in its right mind will pass on that potential.
Oliver will likely replace Mosby. I’d say the least effective DE last year and perhaps the least likely projected fit to transition to 4:3 and the new concepts physically is Enagbare (excluding Van Ness who is anyway a better fit on paper but they won’t give up on yet). Whatever happens, Cox won’t be the one missing out based on actual performance at a level we only hope a pick like Sorrell can match, at least till that is definitively proven to be a flash in the pan (so not this year).
GregC
April 30, 2025 at 10:36 am
I realize now that I counted wrong! You are correct. Oliver can replace Mosby. Cox and Enagbare can stay, along with Sorrell if they are willing to carry six DEs. Oliver will have to show a lot in training camp to make the roster, but that's the way it should be.
LLCHESTY
May 01, 2025 at 01:25 am
According to PFF he had a better year vs the run than Enagbare. I think if LVN shows he can come in and be a plus starter on early downs Cox gets the job unless Enagbare really kills it a TC. Hopefully they could get a little something for him in a trade, even if it's just a 6th or 7th.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 10:15 am
Randall Cobb. When they drafted him he’d actually done very little as a WR. He’d been most effective as a gadget and running back in college—his route tree was virtually non existent as a result. . When he arrived, his receiving was much better than virtually anyone anticipated and far more polished technically.
He was anticipated to be a guy they had to scheme open in the slot and hand the ball to, but he could return and that would earn his place (it did) before he learned to be a true WR. In fact he arrived and looked like one from the first day he hit the practice field meaningfully.
stockholder
April 30, 2025 at 07:20 am
It's time to re-adjust your thinking.
The strategy to win the division.
Is- take Offense.
Always take the MVP. Gute did.
Golden was this drafts MVP.
Speed says it all.
And finally a freak for the red zone.
CB was Zero thinking.
And we have veterans now on the DL.
The packers must put points on the board.
It's what kept us on top until recently.
This team will grow by leaps and bounds.
Gute got what MLF was looking for.
jannesbjornson
April 30, 2025 at 08:51 am
More than likely they made a deal with Jaire, or have an understanding of a deal and he stays; otherwise CB is just as critical to stop the opponent's passing/scoring. Some veteran CBs may be cut through Summer Session. The depth has to be improved. Best remedy for the red zone is better play calling. They have the horses.
Guam
April 30, 2025 at 07:45 am
One more post draft thought - the Packers need to get Alexander's status resolved. Demovsky reported that the Packers and Alexander are talking about a contract restructure. Neither party is bargaining from strength as the Packers didn't draft a CB until very late and the rest of the league drafted lots of CBs early, so maybe both parties now have an incentive to get a responsible deal done. I think the Packer secondary is better when Alexander plays and Alexander won't get paid as much anywhere else due to his availability issues. Get a deal done and get ready for a 2025 Super Bowl run!
Cheezehead72
April 30, 2025 at 08:41 am
I believe it is in the best interest for the Packers to keep Alexander this year even if he does not restructure his contract due to the amount of savings and the dead money hit difference. Alexander actually has more bargaining power. Keeping Alexander gives the Packers more than enough options at CB.
dobber
April 30, 2025 at 09:06 am
The Packers need to do something to get 23 off the books for 2026. That could be a cut. It could be a restructure--adding incentives to a lower base--that makes him an FA after 2025.
"Alexander actually has more bargaining power. "
That's debatable. Gute has had every opportunity to cut him up 'til this point, either straight-up or with a June 1 designation. He's making it clear that he's willing to play chicken on JA, which means that JA needs to be prepared to play in GB in 2025.
PeteK
April 30, 2025 at 09:52 am
it was always a better cap strategy to cut him after next season unless a good trade materialized. Since no one else was willing to take him, he might have come back down to earth to stay with a team that has a good chance of being in the SB.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 10:24 am
Let a player who thinks he’s worth more test the market. It’s pretty clear that that market is reflecting a more Packers reality than Jaire’s team thought. This is a lesson in reality that teams resort to fairly regularly with elite players who have not been living up to their pay or expectations of it but are still seen as assets or cap critical.
We now either keep him a year in return for a better structure for the team, or he restructures for longer than that with a contract that better suits the cap profile and is probably more performance related. Don’t expect it to be cheaper in non cap terms though if he stays on the field, because he’s still very good when healthy and only 28.
LambeauPlain
April 30, 2025 at 12:09 pm
Reading Alexander may be open to renegotiation? That would be an unexpected, positive development.
Reworking his K to possibly even pay him even more based on playing football games would be a win/win, far less when he can't/doesn't play.
We will see if he wants to help his team win a championship more than clipping coupons from the sidelines.
dobber
May 01, 2025 at 08:43 am
"Let a player who thinks he’s worth more test the market."
I think Gute is trying to control where he lands...I don't think he wants a motivated JA playing somewhere else in the division.
Leatherhead
April 30, 2025 at 10:04 am
Demovsky has been pretty firm that the Packers don't want Alexander, and Alexander wants a change of scenery. Now, with the draft behind us, he's saying that maybe something can be worked out.
If the Packers cut Alexander, he is free to sign with anyone, but the thing is, nobody is going to pay him $17M. At this point, his best interests financially are in staying with the Packers.
If he's open to it, he could restructure his contract so that he'd have bonus targets that could take him to $17M if he meets them, which would require that he's on the field. I'm sure the Packers would rather have him on the field at a reduced cost than lose him for nothing, but they aren't going to commit to a $17M salary for a guy who doesn't suit up.
The ball is in Alexander's court. He can agree to renegotiate, or he can get cut after June 1 (that's only a month away now) and play somewhere else for quite a bit less.
Personally, I'd cut my losses with this guy and move on.
Guam
April 30, 2025 at 10:46 am
When the draft came and went with no movement on Alexander, I figured both parties might adjust their stance and that was what Demovsky has reported post draft. We will see what happens. I would prefer a motivated Alexander be with the Packers in 2025. Their CB room looks a little thin without him.
BTW, congrats on calling the draft better than most of us on CHTV. WRs and O-linemen!
murf7777
April 30, 2025 at 11:47 am
Yes, my prediction sucked as I felt they would go DL/EDGE and in no way WR in round 1. Anyways, that's partially because I'm biased towards building the trenches vs WR position. Hope I'm wrong and Golden ends up being gold for our roster. After getting to know him, I do like his attitude and dog mentality.
Leatherhead
April 30, 2025 at 01:50 pm
Thanks for noticing. I obviously had a blind spot towards Golden, as I had Egbuka-vision and never really considered Golden as an alternative.
The biggest need was to improve the offense. Not more pressure, not replacing Slaton, not a CB. Better blocking (like Banks and Belton) and better weapons. And nobody in the Top 100 said weapon to me like Savion Williams. Get him the ball and block for him. I think he'll be an extension of our running game.
Guam
April 30, 2025 at 02:48 pm
I'm hoping Williams is the next Deebo Samuels and LaFleur can design an offense to make full use of his talents. LaFleur seems to like jet sweeps and other WR gadget plays, so Williams should make him very happy.
Leatherhead
April 30, 2025 at 03:43 pm
As I mentioned, in 12 games last year, he was targeted 82 times and caught 60 passes, most of them short throws on catch-and-run plays.
He caught 75% of the balls thrown to him, even with 8 drops. He also got two or three touches on runs, so in an average game, he catches 5 passes and has a couple of runs. Figure 7 touches. And with those 7 touches, he averaged a TD per game. To me, that stood out even beyond his size.
I think the Packers are going to view this as an extension of their running game, which is the driving force of the offense. We've improved the starting Oline and the bench is better and Williams is going to take a little bit of the load off of Jones.
These WR screens and slants and shovel passes are essentially long handoffs.
He's not needed downfield, because the Packers are going to have Golden and Reed doing that. We need him doing quick catch and runs to keep the linebackers honest.
Once Upon A Time, we used to line up two RBs in the backfield. Then one of them became a blocking back. Then we went to just one guy. Williams is kind of like a second guy in the backfield.
I'm really, really like the pieces. We've got guys who can get deep, we've got a real good TE, a real good offensive line, and of course, we just keep hitting teams with that hammer named Josh Jacobs. It gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling inside.
Anyway, we've got Williams for 4 years.
murf7777
April 30, 2025 at 04:13 pm
If this doesn't smell like a SF offense, I'm not sure what does.
Spock
May 02, 2025 at 04:47 am
"Williams is going to take a little bit of the load off of Jones." LOL, this is at least the 2nd time you've said Jones when you meant Jacobs; you're not the only one!
stockholder
April 30, 2025 at 12:11 pm
Love came out and wanted JA.
And he wouldn't say it.
Unless that is the teams opinion.
This either comes down to cap money.
Or Alexander starts over with less.
murf7777
April 30, 2025 at 04:15 pm
Many players say they love the man, he's great in the locker room....players will want to keep another liked player, of course they don't have to deal with the salary cap.
Guam
April 30, 2025 at 10:00 am
I agree with Dobber about negotiating power. When the rest of the league passed on paying any material trade price for Alexander, that should have been a wake up call to Alexander and his agent. Alexander won't get the same amount of money from any other team as he can earn in Green Bay.
I expect a renegotiated contract that offers Alexander just as much money as his current contract provided he plays a significant percentage of the season. An incentivized contract that allows both parties to get what they want.
Bitternotsour
April 30, 2025 at 02:03 pm
giving away top 5 corners for free is bad business and never made any sense to me.
Leatherhead
April 30, 2025 at 02:08 pm
Is he a Top 5 corner? He wasn't in the Top 3 in Green Bay this year, if you measure by things like snaps and tackles.
Once Upon A Time, he was a 23 year old Pro Bowler. Then he missed a half a season, then he had another good season at 25, then he missed most of the next two seasons. Now he's 28 and has had one good season in the last four years. I'm not sure that puts him in the Top 5, Top 20, or Top 40
We can save $17M.
Bitternotsour
April 30, 2025 at 06:58 pm
Yes. He's a top five corner.
SicSemperTyrannis
May 01, 2025 at 10:20 pm
We can't save $17MM against the cap in '25. Not quite $7. Not sure how it affects the '26 cap.
dobber
May 02, 2025 at 08:33 am
If he goes prior to Jun 1, he's off the books in 2026.
After Jun 1, he counts just shy of $10M against the 2026 cap.
Cheezehead72
April 30, 2025 at 08:42 am
From what I read most of these picks were value picks. Yes I would have loved to see the Packers get one of the top 4 DTs in the first round but they were all gone.
HarryHodag
April 30, 2025 at 08:54 am
I think the final chapter regarding cornerback has yet to be written. Will Jaire stay a Packer? I suspect the Packers waited on making a move until after the draft as it drives down Jaire's value on the open market. They well could be asking him for a pay cut and now if he refuses his market is much reduced. His injury history will also be a consideration for any team.
If he stays they have enough players at cornerback. If he goes they will need to find one or two for depth.
dobber
May 02, 2025 at 08:40 am
It's possible they're looking at those depth pieces they have (King, Hadden) and like what they see from them as role-players in this defense. If they were concerned, they could've hit the udfa market harder. Hard to say.
Packer_Fan
April 30, 2025 at 08:59 am
This year, Gute did not pick what everyone thought. I like the Golden pick. He has a quick first step to get separation and the Packers need that. He is going to contribute this year
Last year we thought we had a great future at WR. Well the NFL figured it out and the injury bug csused Gute to restock.
I thought that an edge/DL pick would be earlier. Hafley must like the DL he has. And Gute is hoping one of two of the two edges will contribute.
Not sure about CB. The Hobbs, Nixon & Valentine are okay for starters but I don't see any quality backups. Lost them in free agency. Making up with Alexander looks like a must.
With Bullard available and this new guy Simmons, it will be interesting how Hafley uses them vis-a-vis with the CB. We will have to see.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 10:37 am
We have King (our 7th last year), Hadden (Chiefs 6th last year), Dunn a guy with 12 games and Kaleb Hayes, raw 2023 UDFA out of BYU who was a playmaker and earned a 9.75 RAS. It’s quite possible that they like one or two of those more than we know. It’s also possible multiple back sets will include multiple safeties and even LBs such as Simmons. We can’t know about the depth we’ve not seen or Hafley’s plans.
murf7777
April 30, 2025 at 11:59 am
It also could be true that they didn't find value in the CB position and didn't want to reach. And/or, they plan to sign a free agent yet. Douglas, Gilmore or Samuel perhaps? They all have some deficiencys. After a great 2023 year, Douglas had a down year in 2024; Gilmore is 34 and Samuel has shoulder issues.
Maybe you roll the dice on Samuel and keep Ja and hope one or the other shoulder holds up. I'm very concerned about the lack of experience depth in the Packers CB room.
dobber
May 02, 2025 at 08:45 am
Absent another signing, I like the possibility of the UDFA from Delaware (Herring) of making a run at the depth chart.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 09:16 am
Micah Robinson had a horrendous agility score in his testing. A 4.55 shuttle and a 7.14 3 cone. Actually that is 1/100th of a second slower than Kingsley Enagbare managed on both tests.
His shuttle is significantly slower than Kemal Hadden’s another playmaking CB who plummeted to the 6th last year in part because he was so stiff (their 3 cone is comparable). Hadden is on our roster having been picked up last year for our PS.
It’s not hard to see why Robinson was available despite his ball skills, particularly given he did that at 5’11” and 185pounds. Hadden is 6’1” and 191. What is hard is to see what position he projects to. On paper perhaps safety, because Robinson is certainly fast in a straight line (sub 4.45 40).
He’s a 7th, so some leaps of projection are to be expected, but if the Packers believe that that testing is completely unrepresentative then he could be a steal. If not then the question for the packers becomes why pick him and was it really as a corner? The question for pundits is why no one else seems to have picked up on this? It’s a pretty extreme deficiency at least as tested.
Racingdad
April 30, 2025 at 09:34 am
Pack must have liked him better than both mello Dotson or his teammate as they both went undrafted
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 10:47 am
Dotson ran a 4.58 40, weak jumps and didn’t do agility, which was not expected to be good. He’s also prone to being outmuscled. Not really a Hafley prototype
Bitternotsour
April 30, 2025 at 09:41 am
you have people to practice against, right? you step up, you get to stay, you don't and it's not for long.
Alberta_Packer
April 30, 2025 at 10:06 am
Interestingly - Robinson's physique comparable - Maxwell Hairston - did not do the agility skills. Thereby recording a 9.68 RAS v 6.41 for Robinson.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 04:54 pm
Yes, it seems that many players are guided to approach testing strategically now. That throws the emphasis back on the scouts and film I suppose but is that part of managing media buzz and are teams (owners) truly impervious to that? Are any teams thought penalizing players when they don’t test in their private metrics? There might be a statistical study in there to see if certain teams do.
LambeauPlain
April 30, 2025 at 09:36 am
Fun draft in Titletown! Solid draft for the Packers. NFL.com gave them an A-.
I was expecting my favorite draft pick would be a DT at #23. So Golden was a bit of a surprise, but a happy one after the top DTs fell off the board.
I say surprise because there were good DL prospects still available. Yet I was happy they took him after he fell...a bit of a steal. Good pick.
Very high ceiling. So high I do believe he can become WR1 and play X. His size would indicate that's probably unlikely. Counter the size with his speed, hands, and incredible quickness. He can kick it into another gear on the run after a quick juke and separate in a flash. And just a quickly, he can slam on the brakes and separate just as effectively to come back to his QB. Probably the quickest Packer WR feet since Adams. And he is fearless high pointing the ball. He averaged 17 yards per catch!
Belton is a dark horse. He was judged by many to be a bit of a reach, but that size and strength is incredible! Very impressed by his tape that also shows he struggles a bit with speed rushers as a T right now. So I see him competing at RG in camp, and he just might win the job. The rookie's size would be well placed between Jenks and Tom.
murf7777
April 30, 2025 at 12:07 pm
Lambo....regarding Belton, in watching his film I really noticed his strength. I'm not sure how many times he did this in his game film, but it was multiple where he pushed a defender off his feet like a rag doll. It seemed so effortless for him to do it that amazed me. He must be one really strong man. I'm going to love watching some real smash mouth football out of Green Bay this year.
LambeauPlain
April 30, 2025 at 12:17 pm
Belton built a very tall stack of pancakes, that's for certain.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 05:02 pm
I don’t think Golden will ever primarily be an X WR in the pros. That does not mean he can’t be a number 1. After all, Adams and Jennings were primarily Z WRs. Nor, as Jennings showed, does it mean he can’t be a deep threat.
SicSemperTyrannis
May 02, 2025 at 03:38 am
It'll certainly be interesting to watch him develop! I do not forget about anyone else in our WR room, they ALL could still develop into special talents in the league. It's just more likely that some do while some don't. Developing some of them into trade candidates is not a bad team building strategy ...
SicSemperTyrannis
May 02, 2025 at 03:30 am
Even if all Escalade does this year is push Rhyan to improve at RG, that's still a good pick. Depth, and developmental pipeline for next year are both necessary team building strategies. It's also great to collect 3 people to contend for LT, protecting JL10's blind side deserves a high priority. 9 great O linemen who are hard to pick between would be a nice problem to have.
Likewise our WR room seems overstocked, but that also seemed to be the case the past two years and proved to be underwhelming. Golden is a curious combination of both spectacular catches and lots of drops. If he remains in the developmental pipeline this season because other WRs beat him fair and square, Mecole Hardman or otherwise, that's also a good problem to have. I think I'll need to get to TC this year, even if only to watch this one battle! (There are others that are interesting, LB not being the least of them)
I do think the recipe for success is using fewer WRs, giving our best more snaps. It's possible to rotate so much that nobody really "gets hot." The strategy of involving all your playmakers early in a game is designed to determine who has the hot hand that day; this is only helpful if you then go to them more in that game. Also TE and RB(s) need to get the ball more often. Spreading passes to "only" 2 or 3 WRs would not be a problem, and could be key to increasing JL10's completion rate. Better protection certainly is ...
GPG!
RCPackerFan
April 30, 2025 at 09:39 am
Matthew Golden -
I don't care where teams had him ranked. All that matters now is that he is a Packer! I think he will bring some much needed Juice to the offense. After Watson got hurt there was a clear lack of juice on offense. Golden definitely provides that. And how freaking amazing was it Thursday Night seeing Mark Murphy making the pick.
If anyone gets a chance, go check out Golden's draft experience on youtube. He posted it on his own page. Its a really cool look at behind the scenes.
Anthony Belton -
I think GB had a bad taste left in their mouth in the Philly game. Losing Jenkins early, and going with a couple that simply weren't ready for the moment. I see the vision of what GB is starting to do. They made a decision to get bigger on the OL. They got Banks, moving Jenkins to OC. And then they draft Belton. We will see what position he will play but I could see LT, to RG or RT. I think they decided to go OL to build up the size of the OL, but also give them more options for the future.
I do wonder if they are thinking about moving Tom to LT. But they also have Morgan to play there as well. I just know the OL is deeper and better!
Savion Williams -
This was definitely the most shocking pick of the draft for me. I was not expecting a 2nd WR. I do feel like this was most likely BPA for them. But also, they clearly were not as high on the WR room as what most of us feel. They have now brought in 3 new WR's. We know that Watson will be out until later in the season. We don't know what is going on with Doubs. I do think his just simply not showing up last year left a bad taste in GB's mouth. So I feel like they definitely wanted to add more talent to the position. But I think they have a big time vision for WIlliams. A guy who will be a swiss army knife in the offense, but also will be an outside WR.
Barryn Sorrell -
When Sorrell was drafted, and Goodell came out and said this young man is here, I thought he was referring to the person who was going to say the pick. Then he announced the pick. I had no clue he was there and what an amazing moment. Seeing him come out on stage. That was special. Sorrell is a very good player as well. Whoever wrote that script, was on point! So cool.
Collin Oliver -
I love this pick. I have no clue how good Oliver will be but I love how they took a guy who offers something that they really haven't had since Clay Mathews. An Edge player that can bend the corner. If he is a designated pass rusher in for sure passing downs, I am just fine with that. I'm excited to see how they plan to use him.
Warren Brinson -
When you get to the 6th round you never know what you can find. Gutey has been pretty damn good with 6th round picks. He has drafted St Brown, Ka'dar Hollman, Jon Runyan, Jake Hanson, Isaiah McDuffie, Karl Brooks. He has had some really good finds. Can Brinson be the next one? I think so. He brings good size and they needed another player on the DL.
Micah Robinson -
I know nothing about Robinson. There isn't a ton of info out there about him. But like 6th round picks, look at some of the 7th rounders Gutey has drafted. Ty Summers, Vernon Scott, Johnathan Garvin, Rasheed Walker, Samori Toure, Carrington Valentine, Anthony Johnson, Grant DuBose, and Kalen King last year. They have had success in the 7th round, they clearly see something in Robinson and we have to feel good about that.
John Williams -
Adding another big OL in the 7th round is a good move. You can never have to many players in the trenches. One it creates more competition, but it also puts existing players on notice that they drafted another OL. I think Williams will probably move inside, but they have Walker as their starting LT.. So i'm guessing they will try him at OT first and see what position he would best fit at.
dobber
April 30, 2025 at 09:43 am
" I think they decided to go OL to build up the size of the OL, but also give them more options for the future....Adding another big OL in the 7th round is a good move."
^^THIS^^
OL was clearly a bigger concern for management than it was for most fans.
Leatherhead
April 30, 2025 at 10:08 am
Well, Packer fans like to talk about how important the Oline is, and winning the trenches, etc. But on the mock drafts posted on this site, it wasn't important enough to spend anything more than a Day 3 pick on some project, and certainly not as important as some demon edge rusher.
Nothing good happens on offense unless people get blocked. I thought that Glover made that clear against the Eagles.
RCPackerFan
April 30, 2025 at 10:51 am
That Eagles game I think really put OL a high importance going into the offseason.
RCPackerFan
April 30, 2025 at 10:50 am
I really think they have decided to make a bit of a philosophical change on the OL. With 2 OL playing OG suffering shoulder injuries, I think they decided to make a change and get bigger on the interior. Now we will see if Belton will be inside or out. But he brings a lot of size to the OL.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 05:11 pm
We went from an outside the tackles primarily running game to one led by Jacobs, a major signing who runs between the tackles almost exclusively.
Last year he was hit 2 yards further back relative to the line of scrimmage than Saquan per play over the entire season. That got media attention but I’m darn certain it got a great deal more from the quality control people up within Lambeau. An average of 2 yards every carry is actually a staggering differential.
Even without the Eagles game and the data indicting that our OL was either penetrated or pushed back into the central pocket consistently, the yards before contact stat had probably driven this message home remorselessly.
dobber
May 01, 2025 at 09:00 am
My second ^^^THIS^^^ of the thread....
murf7777
April 30, 2025 at 12:53 pm
Savion Williams -
This was definitely the most shocking pick of the draft for me. I was not expecting a 2nd WR. I do feel like this was most likely BPA for them. But also, they clearly were not as high on the WR room as what most of us feel."
RC....you could be right that it was the BPA. In addition, to the injuries to Watson and Doubs, and Doubs being a bit malcontent, I'll add another reason for adding a 2nd WR and that is the over inflated salaries going on right now in the NFL. There are #2 WR's now approaching the 30M per year. If you are going to be building a solid team you need to curb the excess salaries for certain positions. The Packers know this and are drafting accordingly as they have 4 starting type WR's coming up for Free Agency in the next 2 years. You don't want to be held hostage to a guy you must sign and now they don't need to.
SicSemperTyrannis
May 02, 2025 at 03:50 am
Very curious considering they devoted 4 roster spots to huge O linemen while only playing one (Nijman) who they then ran out of the building and not because of legitimate competition. Something else was going on there. Maybe none of them were that good but that's not what I saw at TC, I saw Caleb Jones do nothing but dominate and then never play a snap during the season. He came back the next season over 30 pounds lighter and they still never played him. I would've loved to have seen them at least tried as a jumbo package on third and short. I consider that a missed opportunity. Hopefully they do something like this, including 6 O linemen in key situations ...
GPG!
Boneman
April 30, 2025 at 10:08 am
I think this draft is a great example of evolving strategy and tactics. The Packers have been slow to evolve to new trends and tactics in the NFL but inevitably come around. They were late to adopt to the three four defense but finally brought in Capers and changed. Result was a top defense and a Super Bowl. We were slow to switch to a more up tempo multiple receiver offense but McCarthy came in and we got a prolific passing offense for a number of years. Now we see defenses playing safe coverages and rushing with multiple variations of rushers We see smaller shiftier speed receivers across the NFL. We see big offensive lines pushing the smaller defenses off the LOS. Teams like SF and Philly and Detroit have adopted this trend early and to great effect. Looking at our draft you can see that Gute has realized what the last step towards getting to a SB is and that is receivers that can get open and threaten the deep areas of the field. We see multiple styles of pass rushers and bigger road grading OL. You have to be very excited for the next step and another SB in Titletown!
Alberta_Packer
April 30, 2025 at 10:37 am
This was Gutekunst somewhat thinking outside of the mocks; with a WR in the 1st - a superheavyweight OT in the 2nd - a "Freak" WRRB (Wide Receiver Running Back) in the 3rd etc.
As for not taking a CB until late Day 3. Understandable. This was not an impressive CB class. First - 3 of the tier 1 CBs (Johnson, Benjamin and Revel Jr.) were all medically compromised. Then there deficieny issues with another 2 - Jahdae Barron arm-length and Maxwell Hairston's weight. Then another "Trey Amos" - recorded a poor 4.36 shuttle. All in all - not a good year to bolster the CB room.
SicSemperTyrannis
May 02, 2025 at 03:53 am
Making it a good year to keep Ja on a deal that pays him for being available.
splitpea1
April 30, 2025 at 11:04 am
Okay, so what's the take on how we're going to use our new DTs? Both were a reasonably good value pick and signing, but I'm wondering whether or not Stackhouse is going spend his entire Packers career on the practice squad like J. Ford did. The loss of Slaton was not an insignificant one, so one of these guys is going to have to work out.
If anyone noticed, SF used their first five picks on defensive players, including two DTs. I wouldn't have minded the Packers maybe trading up in the fourth round to select the one they took, but at least they did finally get around to selecting an edge prospect.
dobber
April 30, 2025 at 11:55 am
"If anyone noticed, SF used their first five picks on defensive players, including two DTs. "
Prior to this draft, SF hadn't picked a DT since 2022, and that guy has barely played. You have to go back to Javon Kinlaw in 2020 for a DT draftee of note, and he spent most of his time in SF injured.
PackEyedOptimist
April 30, 2025 at 12:58 pm
I also thought of Ford after Brinson was picked; he’s another huge guy who you THINK should be good at run-stopping, but both, in reality, we’re NOT good vs. the run.
I think Stackhouse is much more like Slayton, and his tape shows a more effective player than Brinson to me.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 05:25 pm
Brinson is not at all bad against the run, but he was picked not for that but because he was essentially the only player left who was decent in the run game but also offers the athletic potential and had flashed the ability to disrupt. He’s not a Slaton replacement but a potential back up for Clark and perhaps eventual replacement. He’s a guy who could be out there for 3 downs regularly. I hope we concentrate on having him hone his penetrative skills first. Those are what will turn him into a really good pick.
In the run game, in contrast, Stackhouse is considered very good to elite by almost everyone. He’s almost impossible to move and bends incredibly well for a big guy, keeping leverage as a result. With his strength, that’s formidable. Most though doubt his potential to disrupt and thus that he will be more than an early down player. I hope we’ve learned that a one or two down elite run stopper should be part of the rotation and essentially, that’s what Slaton equated to last year, without being as good against the run as Stackhouse has been.
SicSemperTyrannis
May 02, 2025 at 03:57 am
I still mourn the loss of Slaton. It could be that Hafley doesn't want that type of player? I don't think that's it. Maybe he just requires more speed out of his big guy? I dunno, but hopefully he can scheme up something for every situation.
NFLfan
April 30, 2025 at 12:08 pm
My hope is GB makes the most of their early round draft picks by coaching them well. I hope the same for Jordan Love and his footwork/accuracy issues.
-Re: Jaire: I would use a 'per-diem' pay structure- he gets paid for each game he plays
dobber
April 30, 2025 at 12:22 pm
He currently has a pretty significant per game bonus in his deal
Leatherhead
April 30, 2025 at 01:56 pm
Yeah, about 40K/game.
Last year, his salary was $6.6M. This year, it's $16.1M. Add in the roster bonus and workout bonus and we save $17M by releasing him. We can't do anything about the signing bonus money, or the restructure money, but we absolutely, positively, do not have to reward him for missing 20 out of the last 34 games by giving him $17M.
Coldworld
April 30, 2025 at 05:33 pm
Last year is last year. We aren’t paying him for that. We are paying him for how many games we think he will play this year. The difference is much smaller than you suggest most likely, but any player can be lost for a season in one snap. There’s no question of age or if declining ability on field.
There is a question of cap management and expectations if there is to be an extension and/or adjustment that would allow an agreed departure before he turns 30 (so next year). He is 28 now. His pay level actually would be pretty reasonable if he had been healthy and played at the level he was in October.
SicSemperTyrannis
May 02, 2025 at 03:59 am
JL10 had no footwork problems before he started. That's all bad habits learned while being constantly harassed and never protected. Get the man some protection!
I'm glad to see Gutey addressing that glaring need ...
greengold
May 01, 2025 at 06:10 am
Great stuff, Al. My crush from Day1 of my draft studies was Kenneth Grant too. Loved the Golden pick as well. Felt he was the only true #1 WR in this draft. Tetairoa McMillian had bust stink all over him, to me.
Thrilled with Belton as our starting LT. He’s a great pass blocker - and - a destroyer in run blocking.
Savion Williams was equally surprising to me, as I felt he was the most dynamic player on O altogether, albeit with fewer opportunities to build his resume. One of those “God only made so many of those big fellas,” descriptors applies, but unique to this WR!!! Holy crap. The Packers stole him there in R3. 6-5 225? Loves to block too? Sign me up.
There is a nimble, agile, smooth Ferrari quality to both Golden and Savion that this offense has not seen at WR in a very long time. Great picks.
Yes, we needed beef at 1T. Yes, we needed CB - OR, did we really?
I mentioned before the draft Gutekunst signed CB Kamal Hadden to a futures contract in January. He’s literally an incompletion machine boundary Corner.
Dane Brugler on Kamal Hadden: “A well-built athlete, Hadden plays sticky coverage, because of his pattern recognition, foot quickness and play confidence.”
Haden’s Coverage grade at PFF was 90.4, allowing a paltry 36.4% Comp%. Huge value find and signing prior to this draft.
Of the Day 3 Picks, I liked the Warren Brinson selection the most, and I’ll be darned if he doesn’t remind me of Cullen Jenkins in his physical stature. Hopefully Brinson can play like Jenkins!
Felt all along GB would double dip at NT, WR and LT. Well, we really needed two NTs, and Gutekunst signing Brinson’s Georgia teammate, UDFA DT Nazir Stackhouse, 6-4 328, ought to do just fine in run stop & creating pressure.
Stackhouse brings elite gifts as an enormous wide body to take on double teams with anchor strength, gap discipline, and old school play recognition and tackling ability.
I know nothing about Sorrell as an EDGE other than he gets a shit ton of pressures. Dollar Store Gary. Alright. Oliver, he carries a unique bag of PR tricks. Good. Unsure about Micah at CB. John Williams is a LT I kind of liked out of Cincinnati, but seems could slide to G and deliver well there.
While the needs for quality behemoth DT help screamed out in GB, the Golden, Belton, Savion Williams trifecta was a good reminder our greatest need overall was scoring points.
Savion Williams was #7 overall for WRs in red zone efficiency, and secured 75% of his contested catches. Bueno!
Adding two Home Run hitters in Golden & Williams, along with Belton to help spring Josh Jacobs free with true mauling bodes well for this 2025 Packers team. Good.
SicSemperTyrannis
May 02, 2025 at 04:10 am
I'm with ya on all that! Hopefully our coaching staff is as improved. Developing these guys is at least half the equation. Then putting everybody to good use in games, having evaluated talent well and drawing up plays accordingly is an area I see room for improvement. Offensively, marrying pass and run plays and fooling at least one opponent on one play will require some magic that was simply lacking last season. RPO? MLF "doesn't even know what that means," as he stated in at least one press conference. Hopefully he remembers ...