Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Lion Eyes
The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.
By JerseyAl

It's difficult to bring you any polluted thoughts when the Lions game was 6 days ago and has been dissected every which way since, but. I'll try.
For me, this loss is fully on the Packers coaching staff. The Lion's eyes were clearly focused on the tape during the days leading up to the game. They seemingly identified specific weaknesses on this Packers team and attacked them head on with great success. This was a Ben Johnson Master Class - please don't let him go to the Bears next year. And Aaron Glenn wasn't too shabby either!
On offense, it was targeting specific players in the red zone, They isolated a WR or RB on McDuffie, Wilson and Stokes, challenging them to do one thing - cover a player running right at them - and they couldn't. Three incredibly easy TD receptions with little resistance. They challenged those same players as well as Quay Walker to cover the middle of the field in the passing game and found continual success.. Jared Goff completed 14-of-17 for 152 yards targeting the middle of the field against the Packers. It helped that they had no reason to fear the Packers' pass rush and knew Goff would have time for those routes to get run.
On defense, it was sending all out pressure and trusting that the Packers receivers couldn't beat man coverage. Other than the long pass to Watson, it's not like the Packers took advantage of single coverage across the secondary when presented with it..The Lions also attacked the Packers' pass pro weak link on the offensive line - Josh Myers. Here's an interesting video by Kurt Benkert - while he exaggerates that this was the #1 reason the Packers lost to the Lions, I did notice Myers getting beat a lot and this definitely would be one reason why.
I have to throw some kudos to Jordan Love for handling the Lions' pressure as well as he did. It certainly helps that he has his legs back under him and can better navigate the pocket and get out of trouble, which he had to do a lot last Thursday. He also made some really impressive throws while taking hits from the Lions, of which there were many (including illegal ones).
And that last note brings us to the referees. I'm not a fan of complaining about the refs, but I'll make an exception here. The penalty count was even, seven each on the Packers and Lions, but this game it was often about what wasn't called. See the videos at the end of this column for evidence (Be sure to click on "read replies" to see all of the videos in the thread).
Every season, Matt LaFleur has a game where I just don't understand why he is doing what he is. This was one of those games. With the Lions putting so many players in the box, why did he not attempt to get some run game going to the outside? It was all right into the mass of Lions players, which by the way, makes it even more impressive how Josh Jacobs can find a way to gain yards when none are there. Next, with all the blitzing and pressure the Lions were bringing, not a single screen pass? The Lions sure used that play to plunge knives into the hearts of the Packers. Also, why not a single pass to the running backs - another great way to counteract heavy pressure? But Al, you say, the Packers scored 31 points! My response is they got the benefit of tremendous field position twice (Nixon's INT and the Lions failed 4th down). With a better offensive plan (or adjustments in-game), the Packers offense would not have been out-snapped by 30 plays and out-posessed by 12 minutes. I'd posit that would have cut back on the Lions' scoring and could have added some points for the Packers. Finally, I know it's been brought up ad nauseam all week, but I had this instant reaction after the game about some coaching malpractice from LaFleur:
From an offensive standpoint, how does Jayden Reed never touch the ball?
— Jersey Al - GBP (@JerseyAlGBP) December 6, 2024
As for the defense, yes, they could have been better, but they actually did a nice job against the run. The problem was going into the game without Alexander and Cooper and then losing Williams and Bullard in-game. When you have to play McDuffie 80 snaps and Wilson 44 snaps and then Zayne Anderson (who had played a total of zero defensive snaps over three and a half years in the NFL), for 53 snaps, there isn't a lot you can do as a defensive coordinator but pray that the Lions make mistakes and beat themselves. But they didn't.
Getting back to Josh Jacobs, here's an interesting tidbit I heard on the RIch Eisen show: Only two Packers running backs in the team's history have scored 10 or more touchdowns over a six-game span, Josh Jacobs and Jim Taylor. Josh is in pretty good company...
Go Pack Go!
A phantom illegal contact penalty that leads to a Lions touchdown. pic.twitter.com/XmJEXSFq9p
— Nile🇪🇷 (@nileriverx2) December 6, 2024
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
__________________________




Comments (96)
NickPerry
December 11, 2024 at 06:51 am
"Next, with all the blitzing and pressure the Lions were bringing, not a single screen pass? The Lions sure used that play to plunge knives into the hearts of the Packers. Also, why not a single pass to the running backs - another great way to counteract heavy pressure?"
I've been beating lack of the screen game into the ground as well as the remark Al made about MLF. It seems every season LaFleur DOES have one of those games where you just scream at the TV WTF are you doing??? And you're screaming it all night long.
No screen passes, no Jaylen Reed, no Center worth a F##K. Gutey has some work to do this summer. A Center, a few CBs, a pass rusher or two, and maybe a Tee Higgins in Free Agency would about do it because I have news for my fellow fans...The Packers DO NOT have a #1 WR on this roster, not right now and this season it's become OBVIOUS.
Please don't tell me Watson is the #1 either and I really like Watson. He's just not a #1 and I don't think he ever will be.
sugarbair
December 11, 2024 at 08:49 am
I read an article about Ron Wolfe saying they needed to get better at two positions during the off season before Farve won his Super Bowl. One involved replacing a fan favorite. I think that might hold true this off season. I think the offensive line falls under this thought process. I think we probably need to upgrade 3 of the linemen. Maybe move the other 2. This group needs to get better.
crayzpackfan
December 11, 2024 at 09:51 am
Hopefully a balance between run and pass blockers will be sought after. Other than Tom, the ratings on our OL are middle to upper half of the league in pass blocking while being at or near the very bottom in run blocking ratings individually. Our run game is good in spite of them or because of playing against bad teams. We need to toughen up on the OL. This RAS, develop thing went from a reality to near mythology. Drafting tackles in round 1 and making them a RG seems wasteful. Guards can be found on day 2 and 3. We should have drafted a CB at 25.
ricky
December 11, 2024 at 11:25 am
No to the idea that the Packers need a #1 receiver. Rodgers had one for years in Davante Adams. And it led to no SB's. What it did lead to was Rodgers always looking for Adams, then, maybe throwing the ball to someone else. Bringing in Higgins is also no guarantee that he will blossom in this offense. Right now, he is doing well because he has Chase on the other side. Is Higgins willing to block, be a decoy, and play unselfishly? And if Higgins is a starter, which one of the current crop of WR's do the Packers first use sparingly, and then let walk in FA? Not to mention that Higgins will want a big payday, probably in the $32-35 million range per year. How would having two players eating up about $85 million per year affect the cap and the Packers ability to bring in FA's if they choose?
TKWorldWide
December 11, 2024 at 06:55 am
The Packers do not get consistent pressure rushing 4. They do not have multiple players that can stand up consistently in man coverage. They need to blitz to get pressure, yet we expect them to stuff the run and shut down the entire field vs the pass? Somehow, Hafley is supposed to “scheme” all of that? Yikes.
And yet, the Packers are a good team. They’re fun to watch. They are in the mix for the Super Bowl. Going “all in” to ENSURE a Lombardi trophy is a myth. I choose to enjoy the roller coaster. I will NEVER ride the Worry Bus.
GPG!
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 09:55 am
"They’re fun to watch."
For the most part it is fun viewing. Jordan Love is again hotter than the Christmas Yule Log.
But when the D is on the field playing the "Ghost of Christmas Past" Barry Ball, giving the opponent 75 scoring opportunities, it is not fun...not fun at all.
If Alexander, Cooper, Williams and Bullard (that's a lot of difference makers) don't play, encouraging Hafley to again play the "Lump of Coal" zone defense, this will likely be another "Bah Humbug!" game.
TKWorldWide
December 11, 2024 at 10:35 am
Extreme seasonality. Well done!
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 12:33 pm
Ho Ho Ho! Go Pack Go!
(ok, I will show myself out)
LLCHESTY
December 11, 2024 at 02:02 pm
Remember before and during TC when we thought they would be able to get pressure with just 4? Ahh, good times. In the playoffs the QBs and OLs are better and blitzing will get you burned more often. Its certainly worrisome but we can hope they are close to full health. Having Alexander, Cooper, Williams and hopefully Bullard back might be enough to win some games if the offense is humming.
NickPerry
December 11, 2024 at 07:26 pm
I was one of those who thought that.
Hmmm...Sometimes the thought just needs to be enough.
stockholder
December 11, 2024 at 06:59 am
The packers #1 problem just wasn't the center.
It was the whole OL was tipping the play again.
We had this discussion last year.
The OL doesn't know where the LOS is.
The total Alignment is pathetic.
TKWorldWide
December 11, 2024 at 07:04 am
Tell that to KC’s right tackle.
stockholder
December 11, 2024 at 07:17 am
False starts ?
It easy to see why Tom had trouble -
And why they have trouble early.
TKWorldWide
December 11, 2024 at 07:44 am
Jawaan Taylor lines up too far off the line with alarming frequency.
jannesbjornson
December 12, 2024 at 03:28 am
Not after the first couple games. Andy Reid would have replaced him if he stayed in violation. King Sua is his replacement. Maybe he returns to the starting lineup.
TKWorldWide
December 12, 2024 at 06:12 am
I just saw it again during KC’s last game. 🤷♂️
T7Steve
December 11, 2024 at 07:07 am
Watching live, I thought the nose was lined up in the neutral zone and rewatching Al's clip proved that was true and he was offsides when the ball was snapped. That and when Z. Smith was playing patty cake on Love's head while rushing was something the Packers couldn't have gotten away with.
Why was it called OPI on Watson instead of incidental contact or on the D as they both didn't see the other player and just collided? Another 4 points left on the field.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 07:27 am
That remains inexplicable to me too. Rewatching only reinforced the appearance that Watson either needs an Oscar or was just running his route and not even aware of the defender almost to collision. If anything the defender seems to be watching Watson. Even then he tried to avoid impact and regain his route.
One imagines the team asked the league for clarification. Sometimes those responses become public. I hope so, because I would really like to know. Regardless of team, I want to understand plays like that when they decide outcomes or it diminishes the validity of the contest. The catch rule is bad enough without adding that. Like most officiating issues though, it shouldn’t detract from learning the lessons of how the rest of the game played out.
dobber
December 11, 2024 at 09:25 am
I agree with the notion that the Watson play happens 10 or more times per game and isn't called very often, it was probably best left as a no-call. When you watch the replay, more than one flag came out on that...so it was more than one official making that call. The refs conferred, and decided on OPI. The question really becomes: did the two refs have different interpretations (DPI/OPI) and convince each other, or did they see it the same way?
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 10:34 am
But if even one saw it as a deliberate route run to take out the defender, on what basis? I can’t see a basis for that anywhere on film. At this point, I’m more interested knowing what made it OPI, even if that was error.
Oppy
December 11, 2024 at 11:04 am
I would assume that the opposing coaching staff complained and lobbied to the refs / league to look for the Packers to run offensive pick plays in the red zone / goal line situations like that one during the days leading up to the game.
It's not uncommon for teams to bring up specific concerns if they see a habit of what they believe is an infraction that is going unchecked on tape or from a previous match up. It doesn't always stick but sometimes officiating crews see it and agree, and the flags come out.
Not certain that's what transpired here, but that happens all the time.
Doug_In_Sandpoint
December 11, 2024 at 01:11 pm
After seeing the Watson penalty, I was even more exasperated watching the late game when the Rams receiver full-on blocked the DB prior to the throw on the 2nd Nacua TD. Not one mention of OPI on that play. Instead the talking heads praised the block in springing Nacua.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 07:19 am
Well summarized Al. The Lions called us on things that have been present all season and often before and the coaching staff do little about. We don’t learn, we don’t change, we perpetuate.
Whether it’s Myers at C, the wider inability to run block, the use of Stokes and Valentine in zone, the retention of McDuffie in passing downs and the unwillingness to try inexperienced options in lieu of the failed status quo or to accept that sometimes the better option is to opt for coverages players might have a chance of executing over the ideal whiteboard approach. Games are played with real people not concepts.
Your point about Reed and the tactics employed is both salient and telling. That should have been one of the first elements of the game plan. Failing that it should have been an early and fast adjustment. Kraft too seems to have been an afterthought in the original plan. Jacobs took a quarter to appear essentially. Staggeringly inept. LaFleur seemed to have gone into this game thinking his OL was inviolate. That shows a complete disconnect with performance and reality. Organizations that have a false conception of themselves do not do well in any field of competition.
The Lions showed that they have a have a more accurate assessment of our strengths and weaknesses on both sides of the ball. Both teams started our playing to our weaknesses on both sides of the ball. The result was the first half drubbing, of Love personally and of the Packers.
6 1/2 seasons in and more than ten games into this one, our coaches seem to have little grasp of our real strengths and weaknesses and to be living in a false comfort zone. There’s no better way to hold a roster back than that. The inability to know yourself is fatal. This far in it won’t get better no matter how good the roster. In this case it’s clearly not perfect, but on O in particular it showed in the second half that it’s better than LaFleur let it be in the scripted phase, indeed the entire first half.
The writing is in the wall. Other teams see it. We keep repeating yet don’t seem to grow. The LaFleur bubble is burst. We aren’t winning tactically consistently, before or in game. I increasingly believe one reason is that the coaches don’t really have a clear grasp of our own merits and limitations. We look like we listen to our own hype and have built a self perpetuating bubble of reinforcement that drifts ever further from reality.
This was one game, but it was one where a divisional opponent essentially cruelly exposed the emperor as naked, and with a rag tag group of back ups. It wasn’t brilliance of talent but of evaluation of the Packers. This won’t get better even if the roster does it will come back to undermine us time and again, as it has in past seasons with different players. Time has just cast the traits in higher definition. Stop the train, we need to get off.
T7Steve
December 11, 2024 at 07:36 am
Talk about grinding me into the dust when I'm down, CW!
I think these coaches will watch the recording honestly and with more detail than we have and come to honest conclusions. We have to trust they'll have ways to fix some of the problems and the new ones that come up all the time.
The season is far from over. Try not to be too gloomy or you'll go into depression.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 07:45 am
Isn’t there an aphorism about leopards and spots? If one does not have the ability to clearly and accurately self assess, then typically one doesn’t “see” the right lessons or interpret them as they need to be, let alone take effective steps to address them. That manifests in a pattern of repetition regardless of individual personnel. That is what we have seen and it’s highly unlikely to change after more than half a decade in any context, football or otherwise. It’s a congenital flaw in any organization by then.
Bearmeat
December 11, 2024 at 07:45 am
Wow. Calm down, CW. MLF is a good coach. He was out coached last week. If we get them again in the playoffs, he will make it right.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 07:50 am
Sounds like our old hopes re the 49ers or Brady’s buccaneers . Not if I’m right he won’t. This is not new, nor is it uncommon for LaFleur to be outcoached in big games. In fact it’s probably more common than not. It should be rare if he’s the man so many claim.
We don’t always lose, he was whipped by the Bears recently, but we lose often enough to turn a winning season into another almost. At some point the evidence just piles up to the point of familiarity. That’s the point to call a halt. We’ve reached it. Let another team benefit from his genius.
I am calm. This isn’t based on one game but that game showed things that finally sealed the conclusions. I’m a lot more calm now I’ve accepted them. It’s not that I want this to be the outcome, just that one can only see things so many times without accepting them as reality. When other teams demonstrably see them too, that just amplifies the volume.
Bearmeat
December 11, 2024 at 10:18 am
Do you know what I see? A young team. The youngest team in the league (again) by far. I see a first year coordinator with a new defensive system. I see a QB in his 26th start and historically young weapons. I see a TON of salary cap space in the near future and our regular allotment of draft picks.
I see a bright future with a puncher's chance to win it all now. I don't know why people are upset.
Green Bay Shareholder
December 11, 2024 at 12:18 pm
I think some fans are tired of just getting to the Playoffs over the years, a lot of which was playing in a historically weak division and I am not just talking about the current management / coaching staff either -14 years is a long time and yes, I know some teams haven't got 1 but they also haven't had 1st ballot HOF QB's for three decades. Ron Wolf stated it plainly - to have won only 1 Championship with Brett Favre as a QB was "Like a Fart in the Wind". I just hope the goal is not to have the youngest team every year - the best 2 players on the team this year were picked up in Free Agency. We solved a huge problem this year and finally found a kicker - kudos to all - again was not a draft and develop. I can't fathom the draft capital spent fishing for a defensive impact player with net zero results so once again we find a team reliant on a super human QB effort and now a large running game contribution when we don't get away from it before halftime. We need to start beating really good teams when it really matters, not just the doormats. I have to say I can't recollect the last time that happened, we beat Dallas surprisingly last year in the playoffs but we see what they are doing this year and of course that team was coached by one of the former people I am describing . We need to take some games in the next few weeks against some Playoff quality teams and show this team and coaching staff has the grit to knock heads in a deep playoff run and hopefully a Super Bowl appearance. Sadly I have only seen us take what our schedule allows thus far.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 10:11 am
I don't disagree with your assessment of the O. But the STs and D also played. The former ok, the latter atrociously.
The Defense played losing football in Detroit because the lions O drooled all week watching the film of the Miami game and the soft zone where Hafley was inhabited by the Ghost of Barry Past.
Lions O had 75 scoring opportunities. For the record, the Packers also had a bit of a rag tag D too with Alexander (who's been a bit of a ghost), Cooper, Williams and Bullard on the sideline. Those are 4 of the best 5 D players.
I don't know what Matt will call on O Sunday evening...it is what Hafley dials up that has me most concerned.
Packitin
December 11, 2024 at 10:34 am
Without Jaire, Cooper, Williams, and Bullard, what should Hafley have 'dialed up' to stop the Lions? Sometimes, as Vic Ketchman used to say, it is 'Players, not Plays'.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 11:57 am
I guess dial up prevent (the win) defense was the only coaching option. So lions licked their chops and passed into the soft zones, especially the middle...all game long. Hafley was playing prevent even before Williams and Bullard got hurt.
McDuffie is just not good in coverage. He's a banger in run D...but he didn't do much banging, mostly botching his coverage assignments. Wilson too. So is Hopper even worse? Could Haf put him on the field for a few plays? Does the 3rd rounder have ANY skill Haf could use?
How about Oladapo...can he play some slot...blitz? He played well in college. How about more snaps for Mosby? The few he played he made an impact. What are strengths of other players on your defense?
Both Stokes and Valentine are weaknesses in zone coverage. So play them in zone? Why not play more press. Rochelle can play press too.
My frustration is the defense has been coached to play attack D since the Spring. But when injuries strike you revert to the old scheme that sent Hafley's predecessor packing?
JerseyAl
December 11, 2024 at 11:08 am
gold star for use of "inviolate"
Hitnhope23
December 11, 2024 at 03:35 pm
That is the best analysis of the packers I've ever had the pleasure of reading. The packers excel at being mediocre, but the fans keep buying in and record profits keep rolling in, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
GregC
December 11, 2024 at 07:42 am
If the Packers really were outcoached that badly, and yet lost on the road on a last-second field goal (with a few questionable calls by the officials to boot), it stands to reason that the Packers are WAY more talented than the Lions and should've beaten them handily--which means, of course, that since the Lions are the best team in the league, the Packers should beat EVERY team handily and easily win the Super Bowl this year.
My own estimation of the Packers' roster is not so lofty. While I think they are one of the more talented teams in the league, I don't think they are that much better than the Lions or a handful of other teams, and in fact, they are probably not quite as good. But they are in the mix. I consider them to be a contender.
I agree that Matt Lafleur's offense got beaten to the punch by the Lions' defense early in the game. It was disappointing that they had no answer for the Lions' blitzes. I wonder how much the crowd noise may have had to do with that. The announcers said it was extremely loud in that dome when the Packers had the ball. Yet I haven't read any postgame analysis that mentions this. The O-line got better later on, but they never found their groove.
The criticism of Jeff Hafley is harder to understand. Jersey Al does not mention the names of any Lions offensive players, except Jared Goff, who is mentioned once. Goff was a #1 overall pick, by the way, and is one of the better QBs in the league. He has been torching defenses all season. Here are some other Lions players who touched the ball:
Amon Ra St. Brown--a fourth round pick in 2021 who is now one of the best WRs in the league
Jameson Williams--a #12 overall draft pick in 2022 who is now living up to his draft placement
Jahmyr Gibbs--another #12 overall draft pick in 2023--one of the best RBs in the league
Sam LaPorta--a second round pick, #34 overall--a very good tight end
Now granted, the Packers have one of the best safeties in the league, Xavier McKinney, playing deep, but aside from him, they didn't have the horses to match up with the Lions' skill players. Jahmyr Gibbs vs. Isaiah McDuffie is not an even matchup at the 2-yard-line. It's the kind of matchup we want to avoid, but there are other matchup problems with players like St. Brown, Williams, and Laporta. Losing their #2 and #3 safeties to injury during the course of the game further hurt the Packers' chances of containing the Lions.
If we play these guys again, I think we need Jaire Alexander on the field, and Edgerrin Cooper would help a lot too. Even with them in the lineup, the Lions will probably put up plenty of points, but the Packers will have a better chance of outscoring them.
Guam
December 11, 2024 at 08:49 am
I agree with most of your points GregC, particularly the excessive criticism of Hafley. It is tough to play the #1 offense in the league at any time much less missing most of your starting secondary as well as your best pass coverage linebacker.
I do think you are giving LaFleur an inappropriate pass. Crowd noise is part of the game and it is widely known that the Lion fans are loud. If LaFleur didn't have his team properly prepared for it, that is on him, particularly since this was far from his first game in Lion's stadium. BTW we will see an immediate repeat of the issue playing in Seattle as the Seahawk fans are reputedly among the loudest in the league.
I strongly favor Al's assessment that this was just a bad game plan. With so many key Lion DL injured before the game, you had to assume the Lion's would try something really aggressive to offset the loss of talent. Heavy blitzing should have been planned for as it certainly fits the style of Dan Campbell. Yet the game plan had no screens, no draws, no passes to backs in the flat, none of the usual blitz antidotes. That was a complete failure by LaFleur and the offensive staff in game prep. They did make adjustments in the second half and scored lots of points then but the Packers could have won this game with better first half offensive planning.
Bearmeat
December 11, 2024 at 07:47 am
This was a game where everything that could have gone wrong, did. Those happen. Happened at CHI too. We will be fine and I expect to beat DET if we see them again.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 08:00 am
Even if that were true, twice in a month against division opponents should set the alarm bells ringing. Everything that went wrong was not new failings but known ones. That’s not chance it’s where the coaches led us.
In a normal team I’d include Gute as well, but there’s talent here and that’s what enables us to keep competing despite the coaching. We do less well than we could/should, and have now got every year since LaFleur’s first. In the interim we’ve been tripped up by off field decisions regularly.
After half a decade it’s time to be realistic. We win despite much more than because of this coaching staff. Thursday just encapsulated that neatly and through an opposing HC who clearly knows us better than our coaches do.
Nobody loves hearing it any more than I want it to be true, but it’s past time to when opponents are already there.
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 08:29 am
We win despite our coaching. Classic Coldworld, and completely wrong.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 08:42 am
It would be great to see this team consistently play above itself. It’s yet to happen. After 6 plus years, I don’t expect it to. We’ve the record our various rosters carried us to.
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 09:07 am
We're 9-4 with 3/5 of an offensive line and a bunch of guys on defense who aren't good enough. YOUR WORDS, not mine. So how is this accomplished without coaching?
It's all about the roster with you. Has Jordan Love benefitted at all from any coaching? How about the guy we took in the 7th round and turned into a starting LT? Any coaching involved there at all?
If you truly believe the stuff you are saying, you're a fool.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 09:49 am
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish." Euripides.
“You can't make people listen. They have to come round in their own time, wondering what happened and why the world blew up around them. It can't last.” Ray Bradbury
“It's always better to face the truth, no matter how uncomfortable, than to continue coddling a lie.” Lou Holtz
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 04:43 pm
Is this derision in place of rebuttal?
The TRUTH is that we are about to make the playoffs for the 5th time in 6 years, our HC has one of the highest winning percentages of all time, our cap is in good shape, we're one of the youngest teams in the league, we're one of the best scoring teams in the league, and we have a #10 scoring defense.
Those are all facts. Face that Truth. This is a very good team that's only going to get better. LaFleur is a very good HC. Gutekunst is a very good GM. We have solid, stable organization that isn't going to go out and do something galacticly stupid.
barutanseijin
December 11, 2024 at 04:06 pm
LH, you have a point, but no one is listening, especially the person to whom it is addressed .
It’s best to save your breath with folks who are never wrong, and who are impervious to new information & arguments other than their own. They tend to need to get in the last word, too. You just can’t win. There is no ignore button so you just have to scroll on by. Granted, it’s going to be a lot of scrolling in some cases.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 04:22 pm
I’m wrong as much as the next person. I’d like to be wrong about this, but I do not believe I am. I was wrong about Zach Tom for one. I’ve been right about other things, just like you or anyone else. That’s a cheap way to deride without rebutting, regardless.
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 04:45 pm
Thanks. I'm not trying to convince him, but I believe I can persuade others.
Packerpasty
December 11, 2024 at 06:30 pm
no, he's not completely wrong...MLF and his staff are not a great coaching staff, MLF has too many games where you just have to say 'wtf" is he doing...thats not great coaching....beat the best teams before you say he's a great coach....start by beating the Seahawks then the Vikes....show me something...
Bearmeat
December 11, 2024 at 10:19 am
I just plain old disagree, CW. I think we are starting to come out of the other side of a massive rebuild from Rodgers. And I think we've seen remarkable success considering that transition.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 10:37 am
It’s fair enough to disagree. I’d much rather you were right even if I really don’t agree. However, I’m not going to apologize for calling it like I see it because it’s not what we all want to hear.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 10:48 am
Love is again ringing the Christmas Bells down the stretch. He has obviously been well coached. He is seeing the field really well. He is displaying top shelf talent in both mind and body.
The Packers have an elite RB too. He's been coached well...I think Ben Sirmans is one of the best coaches on the Packers.
Where I agree with CW is the O line play. Our star QB has the skill to deliver passes under pressure...and the OL gives up a lot of pressure. Our star RB is able to slip through tiny cracks like few RBs can and turn routine gains into chunk plays. But he is always running through trash.
If LaFleur has a HC flaw, his has feet of clay when it comes to holding his coaches accountable. Leaders have to do this and his tenure shows he will let Stenovich and Butkus continue to play their favorite 5 on the OL. I don't think this will change this season.
The weak link on the O is the IOL. The Packers have a strength at RB and a decided weakness this season at Guard and Center. The Lions saw it...and attacked the weakness.
CW is right about the coaches stuck in their thinking that they have the right people on the bus and everyone in the right seats. And they just keep on driving.
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 05:03 pm
''' the OL gives up a lot of pressure.''''
According to pro-football-reference, that's not right.
He's the least sacked QB in the NFC. I can't find where it's listed, but I know he's pressured on a low % of his passes. He only threw 20 times last week, he was sacked once, had zero hurries, zero interceptions, 6 pressures and 7 hits.
I don't get why Butkus/Steno can't play the only 5 healthy, experienced guys they have.???
Our IOL may be weak, depending on what your definition of that word is, but it's been strong enough for us to be near the top of the league in both rushing and passing. That doesn't happen if people aren't getting blocked.
Bitternotsour
December 11, 2024 at 06:14 pm
yes, but PFF says...
Bitternotsour
December 11, 2024 at 07:13 pm
Offensive stats: (with 3/5th of a line)
Total yards per game: 376.3 - 6th
Yards per play 6.28 - 3rd
Rush yards per game - 144.7 5th
Pass yards per play 8.2 - 3rd
Saks allowed per pass attempt 4.36% - 3rd
points per game 26.8 - 7th
sacks allowed 16 - 2nd.
Those other three guys must be masters of the universe
RCPackerFan
December 11, 2024 at 08:59 am
If they don't make that BS call against Watson who knows what happens. They should have been up by 4 points. Maybe our defense gives up the TD, but you never know what happens. The point being the 4 points they took off the board changed the game.
And since they made that call, they should have called Detroit on about 4-5 plays that was very similar to what they called Watson on.
It is tough to beat a team 3 times.
The first match up Love came off the game he got hurt in, couldn't finish and was clearly not healthy and limited. Also it was in a the monsoon where Jenkins was playing Center for the first time in a long time. Also we didn't have Alexander and Williams.
The 2nd matchup started out slow and the Packers didn't play their game. The defense again didn't have 2 of its best players but then also lost Williams again and lost Bullard. And the refs took 4 points off the board for GB. 4 points that would have put them ahead instead of tying the game.
Packers did not play their best ball. They can play a lot better. And I truly believe they will if they play them a 3rd time.
coolhand
December 11, 2024 at 11:49 am
Or how about the no call on St Brown when he punched X in the face and knocked his helmet off. No hands to face call there? It was right out in the open, the ref saw it, but ignored it.
RCPackerFan
December 11, 2024 at 08:20 am
" This was a Ben Johnson Master Class - please don't let him go to the Bears next year. And Aaron Glenn wasn't too shabby either!"
Its going to be interesting to see how the Lions will look when both of these guys leave and gut the coaching staff. Ben Johnson is a tremendous play caller/game planner. He knows how to attack defenses. And Glenn has really been good as a defensive coordinator. Both guys should be prime candidates for HC jobs.
"As for the defense, yes, they could have been better, but they actually did a nice job against the run. The problem was going into the game without Alexander and Cooper and then losing Williams and Bullard in-game. When you have to play McDuffie 80 snaps and Wilson 44 snaps and then Zayne Anderson (who had played a total of zero defensive snaps over three and a half years in the NFL), for 53 snaps, there isn't a lot you can do as a defensive coordinator but pray that the Lions make mistakes and beat themselves. But they didn't. "
While I agree that the injuries really hurt the defense, I feel like they can find a better way to manage. To me they need to make a big change at least while Cooper is out. They need to get McDuffie and Wilson off the field in passing situations. They are simply not fast enough to be able to do a lot of covering. I would much rather see them going to a big safety look. Put Oladapo in to play a LB/S tweener role. Either that or go with a 5th DL/DE and only go with 1 LB. Just change it up a bit. McDuffie is a liability in the passing game. They need to find a way to get faster. I believe Oladapo could fill that role well.
GregC
December 11, 2024 at 08:48 am
None of us has any idea how good Oladapo is. We haven't seen him practice. He was a fifth round pick who missed all of the off season workouts and most of training camp with an injury. It does not bode well for him that Zayne Anderson played while he remained on the bench. I'm going to assume that the coaches probably know what they're doing with this, which I realize is not a popular opinion around here.
RCPackerFan
December 11, 2024 at 09:07 am
None of us know. I have no idea.
What we do know though is that McDuffie is a liability in coverage. They can't keep using him when teams are most certainly going to take advantage of him. McDuffie is a downhill LB. He can play against the run, but they need to get him off the field on passing downs. Which if Cooper is healthy that is what they do.
Once Williams comes back maybe they would do something with him and Anderson.
Oladapo is listed at 6'2 216 lbs. Cooper is listed at 6'2 229 lbs. That isn't that much different, which is why I think he could play that kind of role. Also what I'm referring to isn't an every down kind of thing. Its a package to bring in versus certain matchups.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 12:11 pm
Very true from what I see. McDuffie gives his all. And in the run game he hits hard and tackles well. But playing him in coverage is like playing X at DT. You already know it is not going to work. So Hafley keeps doing it?
McDuffie (and to an extent, Wilson too) in coverage is like AJ Hawk was in run D. Teams continued to run at AJ because he couldn't get TFLs nor many stops until 5, 6 yards up the field. Expect Seattle to pass at the LBs if Hafley dares them to with his passive zone.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 01:15 pm
Without knowing much of Oladapo or Hopper other than on-line clips and reading, we can not possibly know their upside or their current state of reeadiness. We didn’t see either meaningfully in the summer.
That said, if something is as broken as our recent ILB coverage then trying something else seems logical—these players are active. At least dip your toe in the water. At the very worst it stays broken and, even if it does, the change might throw off the opponent for a little while.
Unfortunately that kind of experimentation/risk taking in inexperience has been very much absent throughout the LaFleur era on both sides of the ball. Players take ages to lose favor and new players not immediate entering the season have to exit for injury typically. Not even first rounders are guaranteed to start out of the gate if there is an alternative.
To me it’s just a highly conservative and performance-blind weakness. If it’s not working to a point where it’s affecting outcomes, see if something else will, even if only situationally at first. Performance regardless of status from origin and a willingness to admit problems and trying to innovate until we break through them should be our maxims.
GregC
December 11, 2024 at 06:27 pm
Do other coaches experiment more with backups, inserting them into the lineup to see how they play? How do the very best coaches handle this? I honestly have no idea. Compared to previous Packers coaches, I don't notice any glaring difference with LaFleur. It seems like fans often want to get some different players into the lineup, especially when they are high draft picks, but the coaches are reluctant to do so. I always keep in mind that the coaches are basing their decisions based on way more information than we have. It doesn't mean they are right, but it makes me cautious about criticizing them.
Coldworld
December 12, 2024 at 08:36 am
It’s statistically impossible to untangle, but we’ve seen how long it can take to get multiple players actually involved over the LaFleur era.
We’ve discussed the handling of many each season, due to frustration at cameos not leading to more time or prominence. Wyatt and Tom being salient examples. We’ve lamented the continual roll out of others. Quay, Stokes and Amari Rodgers come to mind.
Yes, I think other coaching staffs are more willing to try alternatives and reward performance. One factor cited for the Seahawks improved play on their OL had been their switch to Sataoa Laumea at G. He started his first game against the Giants (pinch of salt), but was dominant and a big factor in both run and pass versus AZ, reversing a prior major weakness.
You never know till you try. If you don’t try a Monk/Hopper/Oladapo/Rochel/etc. then you will never know. Obviously if the incumbent is healthy and thriving you don’t rock the boat, but when a player is not getting it done adequately then why not?
It’s not irreversible if the result is no better. As Seattle seem to think, in Laumea’s case, it might have been the piece needed to unleash their run game. It appeared to be last week at least. Even one game is better than none.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 10:28 am
Oladapo seems to have been assigned a redshirt year on defense this season.
I'd like to see him skin his nose on Defense a few times and see how he responds. He played quite well in college. But I doubt Hafley will. He obviously does not trust him...playing the journeyman Anderson instead.
But for crying out loud...is Hopper even WORSE in pass D than McDuffie? How can that possibly be? Would some reporter in the press room ask Hafley or Campanile about this? And if he is, the next question needs to go to Gutey asking him what he saw in the 3rd rounder.
I had high hopes Santa would bring me new BB gun on Defense this year...it's looking like it may turn out to be a lump of coal after a promising start. Ghost of Barry Ball Past is haunting the D room now.
pacman
December 11, 2024 at 01:01 pm
How about we dump MLF for Ben Johnson?
MLF has too often been out coached by the better teams. 9-4 is good record but not good enough. I'm not at all confident that MLF can get us to a SB.
I little hard to judge Hafley with the injuries but it's hard to take getting picked apart over the middle and very limited pressure rushing 4.
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 08:21 am
A little better officiating and we win on the road against the NFL's best team, but the loss is on the coaching staff?
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 08:45 am
With a better first half and D the officiating would be irrelevant. However dubious that was it doesn’t explain or excuse the performance as a whole. You omit to mention just how decimated the Lions D was and also missing its best OT.
RCPackerFan
December 11, 2024 at 09:19 am
Maybe if the officiating were fair Detroit wouldn't have as wide open WR's as they ran pick plays at least 4-5 times that weren't called. The one TD the WR runs directly into Wilson. Should have been a penalty instead they get a TD. The final drive there were 2 OPI penalties that should have been called. Both would have pushed Lions back.
Also don't forget St Brown knocking off McKinney's helmet at the goal line. Should have been a penalty and pushed them back. Detroit got away with a ton of shit which if called correctly, perhaps that changes the outcome.
Yes the defense can play better, but failing to admit that the refs didn't impact this game is not being honest.
Also with injuries, yes Detroit had injuries. So did GB. They played without their best CB and the one guy who changes how Hafley calls the defense. They were without their best LB. They lost Williams and Bullard in the game. And we also were without Doubs.
Injuries are a part of the game. It never seems to matter when GB is missing players, like the first game when Myers was out and they had to some maneuvering around the OL.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 09:52 am
Even as a fan, I can’t really buy the equivalence of injury impact claim. That’s a huge reach that I think would get little neutral support.
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 09:49 am
I also didn't mention that we were missing Alexander or Williams or anybody else. You play with what you've got. You never have the army you want, but you have to fight with the army you have.
We were ahead in this game with 14 minutes to go, went behind by 3, tied it up again until the walkoff FG. That is how close this game was. And yes, I do kind of wonder about the impact of that call.
The fact that we lost such a close game to the best team in football and on their home field makes me wonder why you feel you have to denounce/denigrate/disparage the team?
phillythedane
December 11, 2024 at 08:24 am
Love me some Jersey Al, and Jim Taylor.
mrtundra
December 11, 2024 at 08:25 am
When will the Packers and the Coaches realize they need to win their division games? Detroit has beaten us several times in a row, now. I remember, not too long ago, saying how Detroit was our biggest rival, in the North--and I was being laughed at, by many, for saying it. I purposely excluded the vikings from that conversation because when the vikings and their fans are excluded, from anything, they throw a hissy fit. Still, I did say Detroit is our biggest rival, now and that has proven itself to be true. I think the Packers players are looking for a rematch with Detroit. I think they may get it. First up, though, are the Seahags. Take care of business and GO PACK, GO!!!
Since'61
December 11, 2024 at 08:45 am
As usual Al your article is spot on. The Lions game is just another example of MLF being out coached in a big game. As others have posted where are the screen passes? Why not throw passes to the RBs? Why is Reed invisible on offense? I posted before the game that the OL had to win the LOS for the Packers to win this game. They clearly did not. They did not dominate the LOS and they needed to.
The defense needs Alexander, Cooper and Williams back and playing at 100%. The backups were no match for the Lions skill players. Add in nearly no pass rush and the Lions offense is too for the Packers to hold down.
Having said that it was clear that the Lions found the numerous weaknesses for the Packers on both sides of the ball and exploited them. This has been the problem with MLF in big games from the beginning as Coldworld has correctly pointed out and its a big factor in why the Packers come up short in the playoffs since he's been the Packers HC. Six seasons in and MLF has not shown any growth in this area of his coaching. It needs to change or we will wee this film again and again. Thanks, Since '61
RCPackerFan
December 11, 2024 at 09:25 am
Its funny reading comments and how the Packers basically got destroyed in this game. That is the general theme with most posters.
Yet when we see the score board and they lost by 3 on a last second FG. And that is with the mess of a game the officiating had. We can't discuss this game without being honest in how bad the reffing was. Maybe it isn't the root of the reason why we lost but they blew a lot of calls that impacted this game.
jannesbjornson
December 11, 2024 at 07:51 pm
You don't want to see the Tomlin Show in Greeeen Bay. Stasis doesn't get the job done and too many misses from the personnel dept. to Win the Gold ring...
J-Rome
December 11, 2024 at 09:38 am
Clearly the Lions watched the tape against Chicago. Almost all of Chicago's offense was screen passes. No adjustment was made to stop them either. We are going to keep seeing screen passes go for chunks of yards until the defense starts showing they have at least SOME ability to stop it.
coolhand
December 11, 2024 at 11:58 am
Our problem on defense with screens from what I see is after the snap when it looks like a pass, our LBs immediately turn their backs to the play and run into coverage. When the screen is thrown they are 15 to 20 yards up field and have no chance to disrupt the play. It is also why the short passes over the middle are always open, coverage is so deep on almost every play.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 12:20 pm
That's a fair observation for the current look of Hafley's rendition of Barry Ball.
There were also several passes Goff lofted over the top of McDuffie on quick throws as receivers quickly got behind him.
coolhand
December 11, 2024 at 12:40 pm
Since we do not press at the LOS the receivers run their routes with no disruption. We have to make them adjust and disrupt the timing. 1/2 second more and we would get some sacks.
Coldworld
December 11, 2024 at 01:22 pm
To compound that, in the last 2 games the DBs are so deep that the area coverable by the ILBs is too deep as well. Theres a sweet arc between the two that Goff and Tua hit time after time with no contact till after completion. Yes, we mostly ended it there, but 8 yards or so that easily is terminal, unless you have a clear lead to errode.
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 09:45 am
I always look forward to Al's witty pop culture references. Re: the coaching I also think there are overt insufficiencies with a number of Defensive personnel that no amount of coaching will correct.. When I think of someone (s) like Ben Johnson or Dan Campbell trying to get Gary and Clark to transform into a top D.End/D Tackle, I'm not too hopeful. Stokes, MacDuffie, Wilson, Valentine & Ballentine will not magically metamorphose into starting-caliber players no matter who the coach is.
Another question I have: isn't the same coach working with both Walker and Edgerrin Cooper?
Can a coach untangle LVN's potential? (Maybe, on that one).
I think we have a critical mass of defensive personnel limitations.
There may be some lackluster coaching going on too. I would question Stenavich, Butkus & the DL coach.--not MLF.
HarryHodag
December 11, 2024 at 10:04 am
...and here we go again. The sky is falling when the Packers lose on the last play of the game. Football is a team sport played by individuals paid to do a job. Just like any job, some people have good days and some people have bad days. But trying to micro-analyze everything is yet just one more way to punish the fan base. There's a lot of competition for the eyeballs of Packers fans so everyone supplying info
is trying to one-up their competitors. The net result is a feeling that somehow losing a game is the same as having your pet dog run over by a car.
Some things to consider:
The Lions are really good. I started chirping about them a couple of years ago, some here thought I was nuts. They've benefited from some good fortune amidst the bad. The Packers aren't there yet, but they will be. By the way, the Vikings are really good too. Flores has the defense playing out of their minds and they've done a remarkable job resurrecting Sam Darnold from the trash bin.
Aaron Glenn is smart. He, along with all the other d-coordinators, know Reed can kill them. So they keep him from doing that. With Doubs out, the others had to step up and didn't. Watson disappears sometimes when he's needed or gets slippery fingers.
The offensive line is better than expected. I noticed there wasn't much complaint when Myers was doing well. He didn't have a good game, true, but lets not forget that the Packers did score 31 points. My biggest complaint about Myers is with Gute. Gute could have drafted Creed Humphrey, now an All-Pro, but took Myers. I suspect they will let Myers walk, shift someone to center and look for a guard or tackle. But that happens with every team.
It is not beyond the realm of possibility that the Packers miss the playoffs. A couple of losses in the next four games could be the end of it. That doesn't mean that wholesale changes are necessary. Some smart personnel moves(and a more favorable salary cap) should put the Packers in great shape in 2025.
coolhand
December 11, 2024 at 12:04 pm
If we play soft zone against Minne like we did in Detroit, Darnold and co will destroy our defense. I don't understand how these guys can't cover 1 on 1 AT ALL against the opposition.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 12:22 pm
And my more immediate concern is what Seattle is going to do to that style of defense.
coolhand
December 11, 2024 at 12:37 pm
Yea, I hear Smith likes to throw a lot, but also can throw picks. Some pressure would be nice but not counting on it.
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 10:06 am
I think good teams understand there will be unforeseen injuries among really good players-- (Alexander, Cooper, Bullard, Williams ) and poor officiating and don't use those unfortunate circumstances as excuses for losing.
Detroit played with 2nd-3rd stringers and dominated. Some of it is coaching but most of it is culture.
***We are looking for someone to blame. I don't really think GB has fully digested that they are no longer the big dogs in the North and as a result have not focused single-mindedly on drafting the best players, hiring the best coaches or requiring the necessary intensity and excellence to be the best.***
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 10:42 am
We're 9-4. Despite unforeseen injuries, and unfavorable officiating. And missed FGs.
I don't get how Detroit "dominated" in a narrow win in a close game. That just sounds like nonsense to me.
We are big dogs. There's no question we have the best organization in the division. The last HC we hired has one of the highest winning percentages in NFL history.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 11:25 am
Right now the Packers of one of the FOUR best teams in the NFC. They have the youngest roster in the NFL. I believe the future is bright for winning football in Green Bay.
Championship football under Matt & Co? Not so sure...if past is prologue. Good has not been good enough, yet.
This will be a test of O coaching prowess Sunday night. The strength of the seabirds is their interior DL...going against a weakness of the Packers, the IOL.
A big test for Hafley too! And it the Ghost of Barry Ball Past shows up in Seattle and they again serve up a zone Christmas feast in the soft zone for the seabirds...the Packers may return to GB as one of the FIVE best teams in the NFC.
LLCHESTY
December 11, 2024 at 02:21 pm
"There's no question we have the best organization in the division."
You sure about that? The Vikings have certainly done more with less than the Packers, especially on defense. They've won 11 games with Darnold FFS. It will take a couple years to see how that GM's drafts are fairing but they certainly have a coaching advantage at this point, coaching a less talented roster to two more wins. The Lions are set up pretty nicely as well although it's not hard to see that offense slipping when Johnson gets a HC gig.
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 05:07 pm
Well, the Vikings joined the league in 1960. Since that time, the Packers have won 9 titles and the Vikings have won 0.
So yeah, I think the Packers have a better organization, based on 64 years of data.
Bitternotsour
December 12, 2024 at 10:23 am
a mark that may leave
croatpackfan
December 11, 2024 at 11:40 am
I expected much more comments after last, hard to feel outcome.
My take from the game is that you can not start cold the game vs top 1 team in the league. Packers, by my opinion lost this game in the first half. Second half was trying to catch the way away runner, who has speed to do it.
My main complaint is those red flag that MLF throws on calls hard to overturn, even if he is right. You are running to win the close game, man! Keep yout TO intact.
I would agree with many of posters here that Packers OL are little bit shaky. Jenkins are not playing that well as we expected, Josh Myers had one (f*cking one - 1!) game when he played well, othertime he looks like disaster... We have bad RG and questionalvble LT. Every week at least one of those lineman playing bad enough so we can not say that OL is very good or good. They are playing under the average level.
Referees are another story. But we can do much of nothing about them. I could understand one or 2 suspect calls, even when both goes towards one tem, but there was few more and it was always in the favour of Lions (I'm talking on suspect calls, not the correct ones!). On the other side, if there was 2 referees that saw situation different why they are not review it through NY. Not by discussion. Go watch the replay and than make the decision. Not NY, but you, referees on the field. It is simple and take same time as small
councel meeting on hard issues.
We all have expectations for our Packers. But often we forget few things: - young team, many of the players goes through not so rare second year slump. Few bright experienced players can not cover for them. Also, as someone mention - this is the first year DC Jeff Hafley establishing the defense. And lets be honest - players need to adapt themself on new requests and new way of playing as the group. We have talent on the D, as well as on the O - just give them the time...
I thought that Brian Gutekunst are to modest when he declared that 2025 season is the goal. It looks like he was right. Those players need at least another season under their belt.
I want to ask you all, as I agree with many of you who is not on Stokes bandwagon. Where is Kalen King, what is with him - any news about PS player who played one wonderfull season, one bad season and became injured. Anyone's thoughts on that? Why Packers do not try him, after all, he was draft pick isn't he?
I'm not losing my hope for the season. I know that this team can beat any team any time anywhere, just they have to put their heads together and play like they play last season in Dallas. Seahawks should be another test. Lets hope they will pass it with A grade!
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 11:40 am
Currently, I think GB is willing to commit to tinkering around the edges but not to a full-scale COMMIT-like the Lions. If Johnson and Glenn are poached, things might falter somewhat, though. GB seems to be actively hoping Ben Jonhson finds another home instead of raising their own level of excellence.
tobinrote
December 11, 2024 at 08:47 pm
so the lions had 8, yes 8 people on defense who were not starts and many not even on the roster when the season started. and yet their coaches get them to play, and beat up our O line. meanwhile our D with how many number 1 draft picks cannot get close to a QB no matter what or cover the middle of the field. something is really rotten in the state of denmark
Ya_tittle
December 11, 2024 at 11:26 pm
Truth. Best facts to show we were severely outcoached.
veteranviewer
December 12, 2024 at 02:31 am
LAFLUER SHOULD OBVIOUSLY WORK ON HURRYING UP THE PLAY CALLING OPERATION. SNAPPING THE BALL WITH 1 OR 0 SECONDS ON THE PLAYCLOCK GIVES THE OPPOSING DEFENSE A BIG ADVANTAGE. JUST RUN YOUR SHIT AND GET OUT OF THERE.
veteranviewer
December 12, 2024 at 02:39 am
RODGERS USED TO DO THE SAME THING AND IT DROVE ME NUTS.