Cory's Corner: Alexander Is Addition By Subtraction
Jaire Alexander is the best cover corner on the team, but the best ability is availability.

It’s time to move on.
Jaire Alexander was a very solid corner for the Packers. In 2019 he was second in the NFL in pass breakups with 14 and in 2020, he was third with 14. This season, Alexander was tied for second on the Packers with three pass breakups — despite playing in only seven games.
And there’s the rub. Alexander has a cap hit of $25.4 million in 2025. That’s a number that many teams would be willing to pay for a 28-year-old who has been a two-time Pro Bowler.
But he’s only played in 14 games in the last two seasons. The 18th overall pick in the 2018 NFL Draft was the consummate pro early on by doing whatever was asked of him, even returning punts his rookie season.
He stood up to challenges from top receivers and found success against Justin Jefferson and Jordan Addison.
“Man, ain’t nobody, first of all, ain’t nobody tough that I feel is tough, because if a receiver beat me it’s probably something I did,” said Alexander from 2023.
There is a fine line between confidence and cockiness. And recently, Alexander has nothing to be confident about. The last time he played every game of the regular season was in 2019. He missed one game apiece in 2020 and 2022 and earned Pro Bowl bids.
The thing that remains a mystery concerning Alexander this season is that he practiced fully but ultimately remained out for that week’s game. The charade of on again off again went on since he injured his knee Nov. 17. The Packers finally placed him on injured reserve during the final week of the season and Alexander underwent surgery for a torn PCL.
I’m not saying that Alexander wasn’t injured. It would have been better for the team if he took care of his knee right away rather than tap dance around it. Practicing on it fully all week before deciding that he couldn’t go didn’t help anything. It’s no secret that the Packers could have surely used Alexander’s coverage help down the stretch and in the postseason.
But that’s where the Packers are now. They have to decide if it’s worth paying a part-time player big-time money. And the easy answer is no. The Packers have to continue building for another championship and having the highest paid player in the secondary in street clothes is not a road map to Super Bowl LX in Santa Clara, California.
On the surface, it doesn’t make sense, but this is a classic case of addition by subtraction.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn
__________________________




Comments (40)
Racingdad
February 18, 2025 at 07:10 am
So redo his contract and make it incentive laden based on if he plays he is still one of the best cover corners in the game
dobber
February 18, 2025 at 08:23 am
JA holds the keys to that car. He's got to agree to rework the deal that way. Anything short of a pay cut likely increases or pushes further down the road JA's impact on the cap.
JA will have to look at the writing on the wall and ask the question: if I get cut, what am I going to get on the open market? He's likely going to get a one-year deal low on bonus money and with most of the value in cash. That's what he's got right now. He might agree to a pay cut if he thinks the new cash value will be above what he might make with a new team.
Either way, whether he plays in GB or somewhere else, he's got to show that he's still got something in the tank--he should be in his prime at 28--to do much beyond playing out one and two-year deals for the rest of his time in the league.
SDPack
February 18, 2025 at 09:16 am
There are some levers here that could work for both sides. The Pack of course wants a lower base salary to right size the cap hit and not pay premium money for a guy who has availability risk. That much is clear. So what would entice the player? Provide some of the new deal in guaranteed money based on participation in off season programs and work out bonus. Basically, get his body right and reduce injury risk. Then, provide him incentives to actually make more money than his current deal provided he hits availability and performance targets. I don’t think anyone would have a problem with Jaire making more money if he plays every game and leads the team in interceptions and passes defended.
dobber
February 18, 2025 at 09:33 am
I'd point out here that he has a $267k per game bonus and a $700k workout bonus.
SDPack
February 18, 2025 at 03:22 pm
So if we reduce base pay, we can increase per game and work out bonuses and add performance incentives….interceptions, passes defended, all-pro
SicSemperTyrannis
February 19, 2025 at 10:53 am
It seems to me like the details could be worked out f both sides want to, yes.
BuckyBadger
February 18, 2025 at 09:37 am
Jaire has an agent and he won't give anything back. You can push out money but his agent won't be given a dime back that the contract will already pay him. This is the business side of the sport and his agent doesn't care what is good for the team.
SicSemperTyrannis
February 19, 2025 at 10:54 am
So it's agents ruining the sport.
BuckyBadger
February 18, 2025 at 08:56 am
No one gives money back without something in return.
Leatherhead
February 18, 2025 at 10:09 am
And why would Alexander want to redo a contract that pays him all that money? He's just going to say "I don't deserve this much money"??
SicSemperTyrannis
February 19, 2025 at 10:54 am
Mostly because he wouldn't get paid that much anyway.
dblbogey
February 18, 2025 at 04:48 pm
He'll be 29, and with the cumulative injuries and age it's not a good gamble. I believe I read they would save $17 million against the cap if they just cut him after June 1. I think it's time to move on. We saw how Stokes lost just a bit of speed and quickness after 3 assorted injuries after a promising rookie year.
SicSemperTyrannis
February 19, 2025 at 10:56 am
It would save less than $7MM against the cap this year to get rid of him, I don't know about 2026.
Leatherhead
February 19, 2025 at 11:14 am
It is only $7M this year. And of course, another $18M that we wouldn't have to pay for him next year. He's got about $20M in pro-rated signing bonuses and restructured money coming to him. As a two year package, we'd save $34M in salary and bonuses, at the cost of $20M dead money spread over two years.
Of course,that's not really relevant if he's not on the field. If I truly believed he'd play in at least 25 of the next 34 games, I'd keep him. But I don't believe that, and neither should the Packers.
Boneman
February 18, 2025 at 07:16 am
Unless you can get decent capital by trading him, there is little upside in getting rid of him. Despite some bad comments when he was clearly frustrated, he is not a cancer. Cap savings would only matter if it is substantial (I don't think it is) and you use it to get a player of equal or better quality. Otherwise keep him, get him healthy, pump him up with loyalty, and let's see if he can bounce back. It would be horrible if he went elsewhere and had a great season.
Leatherhead
February 19, 2025 at 11:16 am
The Upside to get rid of him is that it saves us $34M in salary and bonuses over the next two years, and let's us use his roster spot for a guy who might actually be on the field helping us win.
The money we'd save ($7M) would pay for a veteran offensive lineman. Or it could be used to help extend Tom. Anything would be better than paying for a guy who isn't helping you. We had the #6 defense in the league this year....how much did he contribute to that?
Over the last two years, he's been our #4 CB, in terms of snaps and tackles. He's the best paid #4 CB in the league.
egbertsouse
February 18, 2025 at 07:27 am
Just because he was a top cover corners three years ago doesn’t mean he’s one now. There is absolutely no evidence that he is anything but a JAG at this point. He is an undersized CB whose game was quickness and getting in the head of his opponents. Because of his age and injuries it is likely that he has lost some quickness. As far as the other trait, the last few games he’s played in I’ve seen the opposing WRs laugh at him when he starts his yapping. Time to cut him loose.
T7Steve
February 18, 2025 at 07:35 am
You just know he'd end up somewhere in the North, though.
Leatherhead
February 19, 2025 at 11:23 am
I would settle for a JAG. If you had a superduper CB for 8 games at $20+M, and I had a JAG that was on the field, tackling guys, playing his position, practicing, for 17 games, at a lot less than $20M, I'd consider that a win.
T7Steve
February 18, 2025 at 07:32 am
Why does it seem like this happens more often than not these days? What can a team do to keep these guys in love with playing football? Money doesn't work, obviously, signing top end free agents to improve the team doesn't help. Incentives?
If the guy is really injured, like Watson, you really can't do anything. If they want to play, they all play injured at some point in the season. I heard an X lineman say that if a team's active players are 80-90% healthy by playoff time you win the Super Bowl.
If they aren't available, a problem in the locker room, or won't restructure his contract to reflect their lack of availability, it's time to move on. I just hate playing for guys that aren't on the team anymore.
stockholder
February 18, 2025 at 07:39 am
The guy has lost his faculties.
And I’m not making reference
to his ego problems.
It’s about the Money now.
The decision to pay him top money;
Is officially, “A regretted decision”.
And as long as Jaire can’t see that.
He’s a Cancer.
The wants, Needs and Goals of the team.
Are the measuring points, that
No longer support his performance issues.
At 28, the decline is noticeable.
What use to be effortless.
Is the best assessment of the problem.
Negativity has affected his motivation.
So save the money for someone else.
jannesbjornson
February 18, 2025 at 08:50 am
It's about his knees. The brain trust knows the extent of his injuries. He made a spectacular pick vs Philly in game one and the snag vs the 49rs in the playoffs last year saved a TD. There is no replacement currently on the team.
If Hafley is pushing cover two, he needs press corners. Nixon is a slot guy where Bullard is supposed to play. They had their chances to stack the position last draft.
stockholder
February 18, 2025 at 09:28 am
Don't live in the past.
Most slot guys start there, and move.
I know you think he might turn into Casey Hayward.
But the Flip side? Amos got paid and lost it.
Alexander can be replaced.
His window is shutting. And the injuries prove it.
jannesbjornson
February 18, 2025 at 07:07 pm
Nixon will not replace him, that's for sure....
LambeauPlain
February 18, 2025 at 08:07 am
I will be very surprised if Gutey does not offer Alexander a lucrative, reworked incentive laden deal paid when he plays.
If JA doesn't even discuss the option, I believe the Packers have their answer. Time to cut bait.
If he does, that would tell them a lot too. Reward him on starts, % snaps, completion %, tackles, PBU and of course INTs and lay it out so he could make even a bit more than his current deal...if he plays.
Leatherhead
February 19, 2025 at 11:24 am
Alexander would have to be insane to take that, IMO.
It is time to cut bait.
dobber
February 18, 2025 at 08:18 am
Ryan Wood opines in his piece on JSOnline this morning that CB--even without JA--is not nearly as pressing a need as WR and pass rush. He gives a lot of credit to Hafley for realigning the secondary--and improved safety play--and scheming to take away downfield chunk plays. I think the takeaway from Wood is that he believes scheme can overcome a lack of top-end talent at CB, especially if the pass rush gets home more often.
If the team has decided to move on from JA, trading him is the most palatable option--anything in return is better than the nothing you get if you cut him. The cap relief doesn't change either way...and with a trade you control where he goes. T7 says that he doesn't like paying guys who aren't around--and I agree--and the cap relief isn't huge if cut before Jun 1. The Packers aren't really under any pressure to make a move on JA soon. They can wait to see how the FA market shapes up and if anyone they like falls into their laps.
Alexander's contract is heavy on cash from here on out (and the guarantees stay with GB), so any team that might deal for him would likely re-do his contract to off-set that hit. That said, I think a taker on an injured CB with a heavy contract seems unlikely. They'll just wait for the Packers to cut him.
BuckyBadger
February 18, 2025 at 09:32 am
No one trades for players on the chopping block. Why trade for someone that will be released? No one is tripping over themselves to take on his contract and injury situation. Other GMs will just wait till we cut him and then offer a cheap contract as the Packers will be paying him next year.
Leatherhead
February 19, 2025 at 11:37 am
I read that. The Packers return their two starting CBs from last year, Nixon and Valentine. They could get a CB in FA that would start for us for about $15M/year, and we could afford that. And we could draft a guy. I don't think it's the most urgent concern, and as you said, we have plenty of time on the JA decision, but IMO, he's not going to be part of the team this year.
AT WR, the Packers have to replace Watson's 33 touches and 555 snaps, about 33 snaps a game and two touches. I think this is doable. We should also look for some insurance in case Doubs takes another concussion.
IMO, we get a CB in free agency, draft a DE at 23, get a WR and an Olineman on Day 2.
LeotisHarris
February 18, 2025 at 08:47 am
It’s time to move on.
Jaire Alexander was a very solid corner for the Packers.
And there’s the rub.
He stood up to challenges from top receivers and found success.
There is a fine line between confidence and cockiness.
The charade of on again off again went on since he injured his knee Nov. 17.
I’m not saying that Alexander wasn’t injured.
But that’s where the Packers are now.
On the surface, it doesn’t make sense, but this is a classic case of addition by subtraction.
It takes a big dog to weigh a ton.
Any pizza can be a personal pizza if you believe in yourself.
BuckyBadger
February 18, 2025 at 08:55 am
They never should have handed him that big contract. Top contracts should not be handed out just because you have a good player at the position. This is a move Belichick never would have made because he understood roster construction and was the reason they staid competitive for nearly 20 years. You only pay special talent top dollar. The Pats lets lots of good CBs walk and they were proven right every time. Gary is another that is not producing up to his contract. Some players are better off letting walk when they take up that much of the salary cap. The worse is when they get hurt and you have 9% of your cap on the sideline doing nothing. Getting 3 good players is better than one real good player you are over paying. Gary and Alexander are good players but not top at their positions.
PeteK
February 18, 2025 at 09:01 am
I would keep him for this season as the cap hit would be much less in 2026. Sign FA DJ Reed ( unless an elite pass rusher can be traded for) and draft another CB.
LambeauPlain
February 18, 2025 at 09:20 am
Regardless of the Alexander conundrum, my opinion is the Packers need to draft the BAP at DL and OL in rounds 1 &2.
DL needs more pass rushing horsepower for the Top Ten D... and the OL depth is weak, and starting roles will need filling, likely this year (Myers) and next when Tom and Walker K's are up.
I am forecasting Gutey addresses CB and WR in rounds 3-5 and via FA. CB is not as dire a problem as S was during last year's offseason.
dobber
February 18, 2025 at 10:39 am
I think the chord you strike is about right: Gute is likely to hit a (or more than one) position via FA in an impactful way. That's going to inform how the Packers are likely to attack the draft.
Alberta_Packer
February 18, 2025 at 01:40 pm
In agreement with your drafting strategy. It appears that the CB and WR class is not great - but good. Also relatively deep. So good players should be available in rounds 3+. And certainly the BPA should be selected in the first 2 rounds - especially given the wealth at D-line/ Edge. However I am emotionally preparing myself for Gutekunst to take an OT in the 1st - because more of need than BPA.
MitchAnthony
February 18, 2025 at 09:21 am
I wouldn't bag on any player for injuries. Because it is the NFL injuries do happen and it is all part of the game they play. Alexander is and has been injured and that's too bad. It sucks for him and it sucks for the team.
For everyone who thinks they can simply and magically restructure his current deal to take some sort of pay cut with prove it incentives baked in, I want to try what your taking. Yeah sure, he and his agent are going to be so totally on board with that after what you've already seen from his attitude, comments and antics.
When balancing the costs of keeping him versus a separation it is basically a $17 million deal to have him remain. Is a half time Alexander worth that compared to a lesser and/or developing player who may be more available? Or an adequate free agent at a portion of that cost? A season full of non-participant in practice, to questionable, to doubtful, to not playing. Especially it seems when he will be facing better receivers (I dunno, could be just a coincidence). Do we think that will all get refreshed and corrected for 25? Lotta faith in that one cause that's a big ask. If he stays, he stays healthy for the majority of the season and plays at top level? It could maybe happen but the track record is there for the last few years to look at.
Could he go somewhere else, get a new deal, become a new guy and play at top level again for another team and make GB regret it? Sure he could. I liked him enough as a Packer player that if it does happen I'd say, "Good for you Mr. Alexander." Those things happen all the time around the league. The other thing that happens is that he might go off and prove the Packers correct if they do part ways. Because those things happen all the time around the league as well.
I don't get the vibe that he wants to stay in Green Bay. He's been putting those vibes out for a quite a while now and I'm sure he perceives his reasons for that. Making disaffected players stay doesn't often work out well.
LambeauPlain
February 18, 2025 at 09:34 am
"I wouldn't bag on any player for injuries."
But you "bag on" Alexander for his attitude, comments, and antics.
You don't think the two can be linked? And if you are correct he wants to leave the Packers, one way out the door with a truckload of cash in tow would be to "miss" games due to aches, pains and be unavailable. And save yourself for the next big deal. I don't know. I'd love Alexander to be back ready to roll and playing most of the season. He's vastly overpaid now.
Do $millions of banked money affect work ethic and attitude that affects behavior...ease up on the behaviors that earned you the big money? I believe it can and it does.
SicSemperTyrannis
February 19, 2025 at 11:09 am
The difference is not $17MM but less than $7MM saved against the cap to cut Ja this year. If Gutey can do something with that money that helps the team more than Ja, do it. I just don't see how.
Nor do I know how keeping him in 2025 affects cap space in 2026, it might. Looks like cutting him in 2026 would save $13MM against the cap.
Leatherhead
February 18, 2025 at 10:08 am
Turn the page. Once Upon A Time, he was a young CB with a lot of upside. In 2020, he was a 23 year old Pro Bowl CB. Now, he's a 28 year old who has missed 37 out of 51 starts in 2021, 2023, 2024. He's not a young CB with a lot of upside anymore....now he's an old, expensive guy that is rarely available. He's had one good season out of the last 4.
Alberta_Packer
February 18, 2025 at 01:04 pm
I do believe that Mr. Alexander has "spit the bit" - having become less manageable - less interested. Moreover he has shown to be less available - more injurable - regressing to a part time player over the last 3 years. Although drawing a full time salary.
Typically NFL players do not age well. Jaire Alexander has not countered this trend. Nor should we conflate sentimentality with reality. In sports this has often produced regrettable outcomes. The time has come to part ways. And as the Packers discovered this year - they will be all right without him.