Cory's Corner: Plenty Of Losers In This Situation

The Packers were stuck between a rock and a hard place and ultimately had to part ways with the seven-year Packer that when healthy, was one of the best corners in the game. 

So who takes the loss in a situation like this?

Jaire Alexander, who only played in 14 games in the last two years, wasn’t willing to restructure his contract. But it’s clear that Alexander meant something to this team. With Alexander wearing green and gold, the Packers were 10-4 and they were just 10-10 without him. 

This is going to sound crazy, but when healthy, Alexander would have potentially been the Packers best defensive player. He takes away one side of the field. Who is going to shut down Minnesota’s Justin Jefferson or Detroit’s Amon-Ra St. Brown? 

From the Packers perspective, they weren’t willing to pay top dollar to someone that was only playing part-time. The 28-year-old Alexander had a cap hit of $24.6 million in 2025. That’s why the Packers were hoping he would take a pay cut. Unfortunately, that didn’t happen. 

The next thought was a potential trade, but other teams also knew that they could just wait this out. They knew the Packers weren’t going to pay him that much money after underplaying his contract for the last two seasons. 

If Alexander really wanted to come back to Green Bay, he takes a contract restructure that gives him some incentives for being on the field. The problem is, I don’t think he really wanted to come back. He earned a one-game suspension in 2023 for going into the coin toss uninvited and nearly screwed up the winning flip decision. 

“I absolutely am confident that the relationship between me and Jaire 100 percent will be better for this,” said Packers coach Matt LaFleur after the incident. “I really believe it. We had a great conversation this morning and I’m looking forward to having him back as part of this football team, and being a big part of it moving forward.”

I don’t think the wounds were fully healed after this. The Packers and Alexander said the right things, but nothing seemed like his Pro Bowl season of 2022 when he had five picks. 

The reason why this is tough for the Packers is because they are getting nothing in return. Just releasing him means the Lions or Vikings could easily scoop him up.

But I think Alexander is in for a rude awakening. The restructure that the Packers wanted him to take is going to be a similar contract he signs with another team. No team will be willing to give him over $20 million a year, but they will give him a heavy incentive-laden deal that forces him to be on the field. 

And that’s another issue here as well. The Packers knew that Alexander wasn’t 100 percent last year from Week 12 on but he was still able to play. When you get into that portion of the schedule, nobody is 100 percent anymore. You have to realize that.

“I don’t have an idea of when I’ll feel well enough to play, but I know that I need ‘more than 21 days of non-contact.’” Alexander said this past November. 

The Packers are in win-now mode, but picked the wrong time to not have their best cover corner. But this is also a testament to who is currently on the roster. Maybe Keisean Nixon has taken a step, even though he looked dazed and confused at times last year. Or maybe Nate Hobbs can be that guy, even though he has only picked off three passes in his previous four years with the Raiders.

Ultimately, the losers in this are the other players. This move just put Lukas Van Ness on notice. It puts Devonte Wyatt on notice and it puts the entire offense on notice. If teams are able to chuck it deep more often now, the offense will have to keep pace.

This was a move the Packers had to make because Alexander was being unreasonable, but in the end, the losers are his ex teammates. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (61)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
TKWorldWide's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:00 am

The go-to response is “the defense played pretty well without him.” Now we’re waiting to see where he signs and for how much.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:02 am

I have made comments that the best thing for the Packers to do if they could not trade JA was to keep him. I still do not like the idea of releasing him but I realize this might be the best for the team.

As I think about this situation the more I have come to believe JA is not a team player. He thinks of JA only. I believe he was well enough to play last year but chose not to and used his injury to stay off the field. He did this because he saw a team that would not go deep into the playoffs. He did not want to risk injuring himself more. He also does not like to play zone which the Packers are moving to. He likes to be in the limelight and cover the best WR.

I do not blame him for refusing to take a pay cut. He had a contract. If the Packers wanted to protect themselves they could have structured to contract that if he does not play a certain amount of games he would have to restructure or something like that.

In the end I wish JA was still on the team with an attitude to do whatever it took to make the Packers a winning team. As I look at the Packers know I see a problem in the secondary and that it could be their weak spot.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:30 am

Agree with everything you said except your last sentence Cheezehead. I don't think their secondary is all that weak. The Packers had the number six scoring defense last year with that same "weak spot" since Alexander barely contributed in 2024.

Part of the issue with Alexander was one of fit with the new defense. Alexander is a very good man coverage corner, but the Packers were playing lots of zone last year (which better suits the talents of the other guys in the secondary). I think that lack of fit with the new defense is part of the reason Alexander is no longer a Packer.

I think the Pack likely need to find a fourth CB for depth purposes. Whether that is a veteran or Kalen King or the 7th round pick this year IDK, but more depth would be helpful. But the starters will be just fine in Hafley's zone.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:07 am

The chances are they will need more than a 4th given the typical attrition rate at corner. Obviously, the fact that the slot is probably going to be partially manned by a safety helps and we may now use more safeties in dime situations, but they really need 5 viable corners of whom at least 4 need to be adequate on the perimeter in order to get through the season.

Break it down further, and we appear deeper in the center, but outside on the perimeter we have Valentine and 2 players who have mostly played slot in Nixon and Hobbs and then a lot of unknowns. Hadden and king are not fast, both project more inside athletically and the rest are as yet even less known.

Perhaps the team is really excited about its depth CBs, but unless that’s the case, it’s hard to see where help is coming from on the perimeter. Essentially we have enough known commodities to fill out starters (including slot) against pass heavy teams, and for nickel if Bullard is at C. Not even that If injuries hit, so one or two more need to emerge or be added.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:44 am

We'll see how this shakes out during TC, but I think Bullard winds up as their full time slot guy and Nixon, Valentine and Hobbs are the perimeter CBs. They need one more perimeter guy, but given the amount of zone Hafley was playing last year I don't think they need athletic, speed guys so much as quick, smart zone CBs. That could be King or others.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:01 am

One can do a lot with ball skills and short area athleticism in zone, but ultimately, when playing against good QBs, a perimeter QB has to be able to track and keep up with WRs. That’s less true against dink and dunk offenses and most dual threat QBs, but last season was perhaps unusually full of those.

As I look at the current CB room, I see 3 players and a lot of improve. late draft questions with athletic limitations but ball skills (King and Hadden) or just unknown quantities like Junior and Dunne who are more athletic but less heralded in coverage. I wouldn’t mind us resigning Rochell, who couldn’t get a defensive snap last year at this point and he might immediately be our 4th best corner when all are healthy.

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:19 am

He's going to have to take a pay cut when he signs with another team. He just wanted out of Green Bay. He's played a total of 18 games in 3 of his last 4 seasons, he's a bit of a head case. the guy practiced every week, then come game time he said he couldn't play. I doubt his teammates appreciated that, or the time he acted the fool that got him a one game suspension. I keep reading that when he's healthy, he's still one of the best. How do we know that? Injuries, age, attitude, who knows what he has left? I'll take the $17 million in cap savings - it'll come in handy when resigning Zach Tom and others.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:25 am

"He's going to have to take a pay cut when he signs with another team."

All he really had to protect in GB was his cash value in 2025 and some limited game bonuses, and the Packers weren't going to give him that. He knew that his days in GB were limited based on the 2026 cap and an untenable hit on his current deal.

I suspect he doesn't get a multi-year deal right off the bat, but if he commits and plays in 2025 elsewhere, a one-year deal with modest bonus probably puts him about where his pay cut would've left him in GB. He needs to jockey some for the ability to position himself for that next deal which he can do by choosing his landing point. I suspect he saw protecting his value as harder in GB with Nixon, Valentine, and Hobbs, than in other places where he could step in and headline the CB room.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:13 am

I think the author is grossly overrating the value of Alexander to the Packers when he says the other players are the losers. The Packers had the number six scoring defense in the league last year and that was almost entirely without Alexander on the field. How much could a healthy Alexander improve on that? And how likely was it that Alexander would stay healthy enough to be able to help the defense? I think the other players will be just fine without Alexander.

And Alexander's release gives the Packers some cap room to accommodate Jenkins' concerns and perhaps sign Tom or some other young player to their second contract.

0 points
0
0
jaxpackfan's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:22 am

Wise comments Guam!

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:52 am

I agree Guam.

Is Valentine a "loser" becoming a starting CB for the Packers?

Is a the Packers Defense, #5 in yards/game and #6 in points a loser because Alexander will not be sitting on the sidelines for over half the games again this season? He had little to do with the Packers assent to the top ranks of NFL Defensive Teams.

The last two years, Alexander was the most expensive Packers "Cheerleader" since Bakhtiari.

He clearly does not want to win football games in Green Bay. His motivation first and foremost is money.

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:42 am

I agree with money being a motivator, but honestly, end of day, that's got to be at or near the top of everyone's reason for punching a clock.
I never went to work just because I loved my coworkers, leadership or helping the company make more money.
I also recognize that the highest salaries require the highest amount of value in return.
JA's salary exceeded his return. Simple as that.
This was a no-brainer for the Packers.
It will be interesting to see how 23's career and earnings play out over the next 3 to 4 seasons.
GPG!

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:23 am

"If Alexander really wanted to come back to Green Bay, he takes a contract restructure that gives him some incentives for being on the field. The problem is, I don’t think he really wanted to come back. He earned a one-game suspension in 2023 for going into the coin toss uninvited and nearly screwed up the winning flip decision."

THIS is what I think is really happening. I don't think he really wanted to be in Green Bay for the 2025 season. Personally I think he's one of the more selfish players the Packers have had in YEARS. Yes, the Packers are/were better with Alexander on the field, but after missing at least 10 games the last two seasons, those times are to far and few in-between.

That whole coin toss thing in Carolina was pure selfishness. Not to mention you HAVE to wonder how smart the guy is when you almost screwed up the coin toss. That whole thing never sat right with me. I wish him well but good riddance.

One last thing, Alexander was NEVER the same player after tearing up his shoulder when he tackled Najee Harris of Pittsburgh. He was a DOG coming up in run support before that injury. Afterwards? Not so much.

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:25 am

Absolutely agree. I think he's going to be disappointed at the contracts he'll be offered as a free agent. I love the cap savings.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:29 am

Whether he stayed in GB on a pay cut or got cut and found a new one-year deal elsewhere, I think he knows that 2025 is about getting one more big payday starting in 2026.

If his trajectory of injury and limited availability continues, he's likely to finish his career on a series of one-year deals and playing for several teams.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

June 10, 2025 at 02:14 pm

Excellent point NP. After that hit by Najee Harris he was never the same. He lost all of the killer instinct when it came to tackling. Permanent shell shock. This may well be a blessing in disguise.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:24 am

Management won.
And so did the packer fans.
Over-paid, seldom used, said it all.
Temper tantrums aside.
The guy is 28. Needs motivation.
And it was no wonder they couldn't trade him.

No excuses.
Thats what Alexander didn't understand.
Instead of Sucking it up.
He decided to push the blame elsewhere.

0 points
0
0
packer132's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:47 am

Well stated SH

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:25 am

Should have moved him last season. The Coin-Toss incident, revealed a fool and the front office passed on some secondary talent in the past two drafts. See what Hafley has to say...

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

June 11, 2025 at 05:41 am

This is an excellent comment yet SH still received 2 thumbs down.

Hmmm... Thumbs up or down of the comment people, not the commentor.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:26 am

This article describes JA as he was 3 years ago, not what he is now. He shut Jefferson down once a few years back and fans are living off that memory.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:04 am

exactly

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:28 am

Drives me nuts reading these "experts" state, as fact, that when healthy, Alexander is still one of the best. Says who? Nobody knows how good he is anymore and it would have been crazy to keep him at the current contract given the last 4 years.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:28 am

The pick in the 49r Playoff Game and the snag in the endzone vs Philly in the opener were ALL-PRO plays, but they were few and far between given his availability. When talent leaves without a replacement, the Fans lose.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:48 am

Jaire REALLY struggled against tall receivers the past three years or so. He was great against average and short guys, but an accurate QB throwing to a tall WR was his bane.

When I look at the CBs the Packers have picked up in the last year, they are NOT targeting great man coverage types; they are adding heady, zone guys. A few years ago, the bottom of the CB room was all high-RAS guys, now they are all VERY average athletes (5 range) who do well in zone coverage. That's a BIG change.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:10 am

"Maybe Keisean Nixon has taken a step, even though he looked dazed and confused at times last year."

Nice insult Cory. Nixon, since playing significant CB snaps for the Packers in the slot (in '23) and boundary last year has taken significant steps up, the most steps of any Packer on Defense over the last 2 years.

He was awarded a lucrative contract (looking like steal now) and responded last season with the most tackles, solos, assists of his career. He greatly improved his miss tackles and got ball carriers on the ground. He is now one of the best tacklers on the team, responding to Hafley's tackling emphasis. He had 3 sacks and 7 passes defensed also career highs. And he was AVAILABLE for duty on D and STs all 17 games and the playoffs.

Nixon has taken a "maybe" step? "Dazed and confused"? Maybe watch him play football games.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:33 am

Nixon outside was surprisingly adequate. That’s about it against deeper passing teams. He’s definitely a plus against run heavy and short pass offenses. Hopefully he’s learned to get his head turned to the ball this off season, because I think we were extremely lucky he wasn’t penalized on several occasions for game changing plays last year.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:01 am

He's 27 and about to start only his 3rd season as an NFL CB, 2nd on the boundary. He has exceeded expectations in my opinion with his performance and continued growth.

Hafley is a DB expert and Nixon is responding to his and Ainsley's coaching. More growth on the way.

He will never be as talented as Alexander the Occasional, but he shows up and wins plays.

0 points
0
0
UnoMyName's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:03 am

"Alexander the Occasional" That gave me a laugh. Thanks!

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:23 am

And so on and so on, and scooby dooby dooby.

0 points
0
0
TXCHEESE's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:27 am

Would have loved to have JA back this season, but ONLY if he was all in. Management had every right to ask for a pay cut from a player who didn't even play a third of the defensive snaps the last two years. I see maybe Minny or Chicago courting him, but pretty sure Campbell would not want to put up with JA's crap.

Silly that he was a full participant in the majority of the practices a couple weeks after his injury, but unable to suck it up and play the games. The worst thing that could have happened is he tweaks his knee and is out for the rest of the year, but taking practice reps away from other players and then sitting on game day was completely selfish.

One thing is for sure. The projected starters in the secondary are all more willing and able tacklers than JA has been the last 3 years.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:16 am

What was irritating for me was exactly that, TX...he'd practice during the week and take prep time from the guy behind him then take the bench on game day.

He even stated after one of his many "tweaks": “I don’t have an idea of when I’ll feel well enough to play, but I know that I need ‘more than 21 days of non-contact.’” Alexander said this past November with his plan to collect over $4,000,000 for the non contact.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:27 am

Sam Monson and Steve Palazzolo from PFF had some humorous takes on Jaire. They praised his talent but said that came with a 'bit of crazy'. They also mentioned his lack of availability.
As I recall, they thought some team will give him a one year deal for 12M or so.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:32 am

We have no idea what the Packers offered him in a pay cut, but my guess is that it's close to what they felt JA can get on the open market. I'm no expert, but $12M sounds reasonable in comparison to his $17M cash value on his now-defunct contract.

0 points
0
0
Dragon5's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:33 am

I don't see how you can pick your spots with finger pointing; everyone loses, period. As the cliche goes, "it starts from the top."
Gute CHOSE to draft potential with volatile personality. He could have passed. Even after the 2nd All Pro year in '22, Alexander's persona had not tempered one bit, Gute CHOSE not to sell high, a major Achilles in his tenure. All this BS about the "Packer Way" and we want "character guys..." Rules for thee, not for me. In the end, a couple great years, a few serviceable, and plethora of headaches; it starts at the top.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:27 am

It's good to have at least a couple players with spicy personalities, to liven things up. That part of Alexander was tolerable and maybe even a plus. Aside from the coin toss incident, I don't remember him causing any problems. It was the injuries, year after year, that made him expendable.

0 points
0
0
Dragon5's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:49 am

"When a person shows you who they are, believe them."

Jaire is all about Jaire.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:35 am

I don't know if it was Vic Ketchman or someone else who used the word "mercurial" do describe higher end DBs and WRs. They're the thoroughbreds of your football team, and the guys who spend more time playing one-on-one than anyone else...it takes a very different mindset.

We'll see how mercurial Nixon who fancies himself a #1 CB turns out to be during and after this season after the Packers paid Hobbs $12M AAV and Nixon's not making nearly so much.

0 points
0
0
lou's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:27 am

There are arguments on this "business decision" with merit from both sides that have been discussed over and over again. The key issue of course is posting on game days i.e. return on investment. Shut down corners are RARE especially those that will also sell out to stop the run in addition to their coverage ability and when on the field he did both. When I look back on the big playoff win over the Cowboy's I also saw a player who stepped it up a notch in a big game, his setting up of MVP candidate Dak Prescott and his breaks on the picks reminded me of Adderley and Woodson. It is too bad something could not be worked out, lets hope the GM puts the cap savings to good use going forward.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:40 am

The Packers have had too many of these situations where they give a player a huge contract and then find themselves 2-3 seasons later in a situation where they need to either release the player of try to trade him. Rodgers, Bakthiari, now Alexander to name a few. They ended up with nothing in return for either Bak or Alexander. They received some good value back for Rodgers but if they had traded him after 2021 instead of signing him to that huge contract in '22 they would have done much better in terms of their return.

This has been a consistent problem for this Packers management team and it has continued with Love's current contract. In fairness to Love we don't yet know what he will become as an NFL QB but why the big contract?

We'll see how all of this plays out for the defense without Alexander. Hopefully the Packers will add some depth to the CB room and the younger players will take a step up. The Packers will need to figure this out during TC. GPG! Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Dragon5's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:07 am

'61, THANK YOU for being a voice of reason reinforcing management's lack of execution to realize (asset) value. Converting assets such as Rodgers, Bahk, and Alexander at peak value within a long-view context are what separates not just contenders from pretenders, but champions above all. Gute easily has a "D" round 1 drafting grade; maximizing value with premier talent isn't far behind.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:37 am

"The Packers have had too many of these situations where they give a player a huge contract and then find themselves 2-3 seasons later in a situation where they need to either release the player of try to trade him. "

I'd argue EVERY team has this issue. Contract structures for higher end players with ballooned cash values in years three and four invariably lead to restructures or trade rumors/releases as the amount of cap they consume becomes untenable.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

June 10, 2025 at 12:04 pm

You draft a guy, develop him. Then you either have to pay him or you have to replace him. This isn't exclusive to the Packers.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

June 10, 2025 at 01:27 pm

Why the big contract for Jordan Love? Because if the Packers didn't sign him to a big contract, he would've gotten a big contract from another team, and the Packers would've had to start all over at QB, after spending a first round draft pick on Love and training him in for three years.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

June 11, 2025 at 10:27 am

Yes. Love was paid and secured at what amazingly is now market value. Crazy money but as long as the Packers maintain a solid balance sheet, it's all Monopoly money to them.

0 points
0
0
the_gavia_pass's picture

June 12, 2025 at 11:27 am

gutekunst history is full of dead money. but is that also on russ ball? or on mark murphy who has always the last word?
rodgers situation was different. they traded up for a QB not saying a word to rodgers. so he made them pay with 2 mvp and a big big contract. without that trade up everything would have changed (and a WR instead of a bust qb would have taken us to SB).
bakhtiari was injured...you can't see future injuries...so this is not on the gm.
alexander was a big management mistake. the guy is not happy I think he is not a fan of the love era but they managed to make him stay giving him too much money. and now they pay for the mistake because alexander unhappiness derailed his career in GB.
love contract is a direct consequence of that damn 2020 night. they have doubt on him but they can't trade or release him because they should resign 1 minute after that. so they had to pay him big money even if he is more a bust than a big money QB

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:41 am

This had to be done. But I don't have to like it.

JA was the last member of the All Dreamy Eyes Packer team. The others were Randall Cobb and Chester Marcol.

Dreamy Eyes. Full Heart. Can't Lose.

Big Sexy has spoken,

Burp

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

June 10, 2025 at 01:29 pm

Pretty big gap between Chester Marcol and Randall Cobb. That must have been tough for you.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:45 pm

It was a living hell Greg...

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

June 10, 2025 at 08:05 pm

My wife was always raving about Randall Cobb's eyes. She still does sometimes.

0 points
0
0
Vanwe's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:32 am

Now don't get me wrong, Jaire was the Best CB on our team last year and our defense is worse without him. However even when he played last year he was not the same player. He played 232 coverage snaps and allowed 231 yards, 56.7% completions, 7.7 yards per target, and an 86.9 passer rating. When you factor in that he faced a lot of bad offenses (he only played against 2 teams that ended the season with winning records) that is not particularly impressive. Heck he gave up more TDs in 6.1 games last year than he did in 15 games in 2022.

I am sad to see him go, but he was not worth the money he would have been getting this year.

0 points
0
0
the_gavia_pass's picture

June 12, 2025 at 11:18 am

the problem is alexander in a very down year had 75 pff grade....nixon in his best year had 65

0 points
0
0
Vanwe's picture

June 16, 2025 at 08:57 am

Re-read the very first sentence of my previous post.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

June 10, 2025 at 10:38 am

The Gutekunst Packers have not been particularly insightful about stringently assessing the character of those they plan to reward with a very large sum of money. One important question to ask beforehand is 'how will this player respond to a huge contract renewal?' Will they start to decline, lose a bit of interest, or will they become even better? I think it is important for teams to more accurately assess that phenomenon as there are huge risks at stake. There are psychologists and tests that can help with character testing.
IMO, all 3 of the most recent highly-paid vets are personalities who prioritize the self more than team. All of their play declined after 'securing the bag'. Some will say Jaire had injuries that kept him from playing but when he practiced all week and failed to show at games, that was a red flag. Clark postponed surgery on long-standing bunions/bone spurs. Would Tom Brady have chosen to let that go?

My guess is that someone like Rasul Douglas would have kept up his excellent effort and play after being paid as he showed he was internally motivated as well as more team oriented. He wanted to see D improvement and took the risk of critiquing Barry. Someone like Gary would not (did not) have exerted that effort/risk.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

June 10, 2025 at 01:33 pm

Good to know that Kenny Clark was selfish for playing through an injury. With your medical expertise, you should think about joining the Packers training staff.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

June 10, 2025 at 02:41 pm

@Greg-He had a bunion and spurs-Those conditions are long-standing. One does not develop a bunion in one year. It takes many years, same with bone spurs. He should have taken care of it last off-season. Bunions need to be removed during surgery, same for spurs.
I would look it up.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

June 10, 2025 at 06:23 pm

"One important question to ask beforehand is 'how will this player respond to a huge contract renewal?' Will they start to decline, lose a bit of interest, or will they become even better? I think it is important for teams to more accurately assess that phenomenon as there are huge risks at stake. There are psychologists and tests that can help with character testing."

As far as I know, Bob Harlan left the Packers Book of Important Questions to Ask in a safe place upon his departure. Now, what happened to it after that, I cannot say with any confidence. Perhaps it was misplaced, or maybe Ted and now Gute have consulted it. It is a puzzler, that's for sure. Those who have seen the book, however, recall question 148 being "How long does it take for a bunion to develop?" Do with that what you will.

As far as psychologists assisting with personality inventories and character evaluations, well, you should likely run that idea up the pole ASAP because I'm certain the gang at 1265 has never heard of such a thing. You'd be doing them a great service.

Stay strong, fangirl. Your cries from the wilderness will on day be heard and the Packers will finally see the light.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

June 10, 2025 at 09:40 pm

@LH- I would recommend you find a hobby instead of breathing down my neck on the regular -it's creepy and carries a stalking vibe. Perhaps I will share my concerns with Mr. Nagler.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

June 10, 2025 at 11:53 am

Of course there are not "Plenty of Losers" with this situation. Actually, I see more of a net gain than a multiple loss with JA taking his talents to the biggest pile of cash. So a few positives:

The CB Room - with more snaps now available for hungry, young and more durable CBs - who can tackle and play well in zone.
The Locker Room - while JA could be entertaining at times - he was likewise annoying. So less babysitting now required.
The Salary Cap - 17.5M re-claimed for extensions and FAs - which can further lock-in the core.

Also I am expecting that Richmond Williams and the Pro Scouting Dept. to be heard from after cutdown day (Aug. 26) - if not before - with another player or two. Perhaps a CB.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

June 10, 2025 at 07:59 pm

I think everybody wins here.

Alexander gets to be a FA and can sign on wherever he wants....if they want him. That's a win for him.
The Packers clear him off the books for 2026 and still save about $6M. That's a win.
The team frees up a roster spot for a younger, healthier guy with an upside. That's a win.

The drama is over. That's a win.
Some other team gets to add him to their team. That's a win.

We have plenty of money to add a better player, and I suspect we'll do that.

xXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I think that Gutekunst has changed his philosophy regarding drafting DBs early in the draft. After the past years of Alexander, Savage, Stokes, Jackson not really making a difference, and then we get guys like Hobbs, McKinney, and Nixon in FA and draft 7th rounders like King and Valentine.

When we passed on good CB last year, and chose an offensive lineman instead, I think it signaled a shift in how the Packers are going to address the secondary. I'm not expecting any high draft picks are going to be used on DBs for a while.

We're going to play 2, and we've got 3. One more reliable guy would sure be nice.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

June 13, 2025 at 04:10 pm

"This is going to sound crazy, but when healthy, Alexander would have potentially been the Packers best defensive player."

Not even close. That player is Xavier McKinney. All day. C'mon.

0 points
0
0