"Packers have to continue to improve as it moves on a collision course with the Lions on Thanksgiving."

I'm thinking there's a game they need to improve for before then. Keep improving, but let's not look at anything but the next game. The last three weeks is all you need for proof of that.

We did what we needed to do. Love was good. Watson was good. The D had a sub par day and the offense made what should have been easy hard by dropping easy passes. Not to be outdone, the D turned down Winston’s gifts till almost the end of the game. We won. We did not play well overall. The vastly depleted Giants weren’t good and nor were we.

I was really critical of Jordon Love after the eagles game, he had a hell of game against the giants. He looked like a different QB, do we give credit to LaFluer? I think they are figuring out how to play after losing Tucker Craft. Beating the Vikings and their wonder boy QB would be great for the team and fan base.

Mike Wahle's diagnosis of current WR's/TE's without Tucker Kraft:----(Watson not included)

"Lack of physicality, lack of sustained blocks, lack of ability to secure the ball and no YAC"

-Combine above with leaky O-Line

MLF has to get creative and not coach as though he has Tucker Kraft

"It wasn’t a great game. Heck, it wasn’t even a good game. But the most important part was the fact that the Packers got a much-needed win".

This is the type of bs that foolishly convinces many, and not just the fools, that this team can get the wins it needs against the better. It isn't, and won't. The Eagles can because they have been all season, beating the better teams with, and I believe is planned, anemic Offense, weekly. The Packers, by no measure available, can be seen as equal to the Eagles, and why it's foolish to think this GB team can mirror what Philly does, basically, on purpose, and the Packers do while tripping over themselves.

There is no mention of the Eagles in this article, but I figured the best way to make my point was to use a team that was closely comparable to how winning, though the comparison of whom those wins came against is far from equal.

Each flawed win shouldn't allow you to deny what you know and see weekly from this team. Drink slowly, don't gulp.

I wonder when the stats nerds will begin to realize something everyone with a good pair of eyes can see: the Packers run defense has been shaky for a long time. Rico Dowdle looked like the second coming of Jim Brown. Tracy on Sunday gashed the Packers and he's a back up.

The logic of trading Kenny Clark for Micah Parsons was clear, but Clark's loss inside has been hurtful. As much promise as Cooper and Walker have at linebacker, things have been porous at best.

Statistically the Packers defense, overall, hasn't been all that bad. Those numbers are distorted by a pretty good pass defense. I wonder about Brooks and Wooden on the inside. Wyatt has been a good pass rusher but run defender is another story.

Teams have found a seam to run through, just off tackle, after Gary and Parsons go full rush outside. The linebackers and safeties must fill the gaps and they have not with any consistency.

In today's NFL it is very difficult to have all phases of the game playing in sync especially with a rash of injuries, but the Packers have an issue that needs more work.

Style points are only awarded in figure skating and gymnastics. While this has been mostly an unaesthetic season for the Packers - they are not in the minority. No team has been a standout. So the SB is still very much up for grabs by a slew of teams - including the Packers.