Curd is the Word: It's Just a Flesh Wound
By GregMeinholz

Screwball and satirical comedy may be some of the best versions of the genre when it comes to cinema in the last 50 years. When you want nothing but brainless laughs, it doesn't get much better than that. Perhaps one of the top movies that could fit that description would be Monty Python and the Holy Grail, released in 1975—just an absurd parody of a medieval times movie. Despite this movie now being 50 years old, it still has some of the most quotable lines that are said every day, which people might not even realize come from the legendary film. Perhaps the top example would be the famous line "It's just a flesh wound!" said by the Black Knight after he has his arm dismembered comically while facing off against King Arthur. King Arthur proceeds to comically dismember the Black Knight further until he has no arms or legs left. To which the Black Knight continues to state that "Tis but a scratch!"
Of course, this scene is meant to be comically ridiculous. But, in a way, it can serve as a motivation of sorts, representing a mindset that no matter what you may be going through, you can still persevere. The Black Knight didn't care about the loss of his appendages, he was still going to fight King Arthur the best he could. While they didn't lose appendages, we found out this week that some Packers players were playing injured the majority of last season. But, like the Black Knight, they didn't care and pushed through no matter what.
Kenny Clark
Admittedly, I can't stand when word of injury to a player that may have hampered their season comes out after the fact. The reason would be that you have to listen to all the endless speculation around their performance. Have they regressed? Were some changes by the coaching staff to blame? Do they not care anymore? Are they discontent with their situation? All of this could end if it were just to come out that they're battling a bit of a hampering injury, where mid-season surgery just isn't worth it.
This was exactly the situation for Kenny Clark. All we heard in the second half of the season was, "Where is Kenny Clark?" and entering free agency and the draft, many talked about trading him or replacing him. Well, this past week, he shed a little light on the subject himself in an interview, stating that he underwent foot surgery in January for bunions/bone spurs. According to Clark, the injury occurred in the season opener in Brazil. When asked what it was like playing through that injury, Kenny Clark iterated that it's not just speed, it's every single step. You're taking every step, and your toe is busted. Clark spent the majority of the season on the injury list for a toe injury, but due to his consistent availability, no one paid any attention to the severity.
It can be argued that this may have severely impacted Kenny Clark during the 2024 campaign. Trying to get that initial burst out of your stance can be fairly difficult if you're dealing with a busted toe. Your footwork in general is thrown off as you have to account for that difference with every step. A leverage game that you may have usually won against an offensive lineman could put you at a disadvantage, as you're just not able to anchor yourself in ways you're accustomed to. It can completely throw you off your game a bit, so it's no surprise that Clark wasn't his usual disruptive self.
Many might ask the question, "Well then, why was he even on the field?" To that, I would argue that sometimes with a player like Kenny Clark, you take him at 70% over nothing at all. He can still manage a productive season, and you still want to keep him involved.
Now that we have a little insight into why Clark may have had an off-season by his standards, hopefully, we will see Clark back to his true form in 2025.
Lukas Van Ness
Kenny Clark isn't the only one who had the severity of an injury kind of kept under wraps. Lukas Van Ness played last season with a cast protecting a broken thumb on his right hand until week 10. Van Ness says that even after the cast was removed, he had a bit of a mental block learning how to use his hands again.
When you're a defensive lineman trying to elude a 300+ pound offensive lineman, your hands can be everything. You're trying to prevent them from getting a lock on you, get them a little uncomfortable so you can take advantage. The ability to use your hands to accomplish that is huge. As a result, Van Ness was mainly limited to the right side of the defensive line. Perhaps one of his best skills when the Packers drafted him was his ability to play all around the defensive line. Van Ness could play inside and outside in college. In Year 1, playing in a 3-4 with Joe Barry, Van Ness was sort of limited to being an Edge Rusher. In year 2, when perhaps Van Ness could move around in the new 4-3 with Jeff Hafley, he was instead hampered by injury, but he still carried on.
In OTAs so far, Van Ness has been spotted at DT during 2-minute drills. "I just think there's a different confidence level with him," Matt LaFleur said about Van Ness. He stated that Van Ness has been embracing a lot of the coaching he's received so far and is looking very good. Many wrote off Van Ness after a rough year 2, but we find out now that a minor injury may have had an impact. Hopefully year 3, we will see a different player that shows why he was chosen 13th overall in the 2023 draft.

Aaron Rodgers is a Steeler
How long has it been since Free Agency started? Three months? The rumors trying to figure out where Aaron Rodgers will end up after his departure from the New York Jets have been rolling almost from the start. After only a couple of days, it became fairly obvious that Pittsburgh would be the best destination for him. But days and even weeks went by with Rodgers still not making a decision.
Initially, I thought for sure that his decision would be announced on the first night of the NFL Draft. It would just be like Aaron Rodgers to try to take some of the spotlight off the hosting city of Green Bay to announce his future intentions. Instead, he waited until OTAs were just about over to make his decision. Some say this is due to individuals close to him undergoing cancer treatment, and he wanted to focus on that before his return to football. If this is true, it is a bit admirable, but at the same time, the timing seems a tad convenient for a guy who never really liked OTAs during his time in Green Bay. But apparently, he will join the Steelers this week for the remainder of their program.
To be honest, Aaron Rodgers has handled his departure from Green Bay much better than Brett Favre did. Rodgers still displays some Green Bay loyalty and talks positively about Jordan Love and the fact that he envisions the Packers being successful with Love for a while. Favre seemed like he wished for Green Bay to be buried in the seventh circle of hell up until he finally made up with them before his Hall of Fame induction. So, while we want to ensure the Packers have more success than their former QB, there's not as much animosity on the topic.
In Week 8, on October 26th, the Packers will travel to Pittsburgh to face Aaron Rodgers and the Steelers. Aaron Rodgers has defeated 31/32 NFL teams, with the lone remaining being Green Bay. We might wish him luck weeks 1-7 and 9-18, but when the Packers visit the Steelers, all bets are off, and we hope the Green and Gold embarrass the Steelers and their former leader.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________




Comments (35)
porupack
June 08, 2025 at 06:42 am
Well Greg, I was skeptical in the reading of your piece, but you kind of convinced me on Clark. You softened me a little of my opinioin on LVN....but not quite buying that one. LVN could have used braces for the psychological element...as many do after injuries for the mental aspect. WIth Clark, we know he proved it...and had a down year. With LVN, he hasn't proved it yet....so he is what he is until he shows otherwise. Good luck, and best wishes for the young man....as long as a player is on the roster of G, I hope we all root/pull for him to be successful, and make his place in the GB hall of fame. Everyone can improve, reinvent, transform....and coaches are part of that equation.....so I'm not one to trash a guy that is putting in maximum effort and shows potential. I'm quicker to trash coaches and leadership, haha. Bring out your dead!, Bring out your dead! Hey, wait, I'm not dead yet!
LLCHESTY
June 08, 2025 at 12:26 pm
Agreed on LVN. I hope the light comes on and he takes a big step this year but I'm not going to hold my breath. The coaches are singing his praises and he knows what's on the line. Now it's time to sh!t or get off the pot. I think they've shown they won't keep him on the field just because he's a 1st round pick, the time for learning on the job is over.
Good article by Bretl on the subject:
https://www.espnlacrosse.com/2025/06/06/with-confidence-high-a-pivotal-t...
Guam
June 08, 2025 at 07:30 am
Every Packer fan wants Clark to have a big rebound year in 2025 and be a force in the middle. The concern is injury. Clark will turn 30 this season and it is common for OL and DL to have more injuries as they cross that threshold into an "older" player. If Clark has a second injury filled season the Packers will be in the same boat with him they were in with Alexander this offseason - big contract players who underperform due to injury for two consecutive years. Let's hope Clark stays healthy this year.
Not at all surprised LVN is playing some DT. He did so at Iowa and the Packers may well find he can at the NFL level as well.
WD
June 08, 2025 at 12:01 pm
I luv the idea o Van Ness moving inside particularly on passing downs.
Vachio
June 08, 2025 at 07:42 am
Injuries and such affect every person differently. Jerry Rice tore an ACL in week 1 and came back to play and play well in the playoffs. We've all heard about Adrian Peterson returning from the same injury quickly and well. But we also know other players who effectively had their careers ended by that same injury. It takes time both physically and mentally to recover, with the mental part being MUCH harder. I know recovering from my first ACL surgery, I was terrified to do any cutting movements. I was given a clean bill of health from the therapists, but I could not cut. My body shut down when I tried. It wasn't until I was outside, playing with a dog, when I started cutting again. Playing with the dog, I forgot I couldn't cut and so I just did it while playing. I realized what I was doing, tried it a few times without the dog and it was only at that point I was completely "recovered" from the injury.
Professional athletes often seem superhuman, but at their core, they're human beings just like the rest of us, subject to the same foibles and idiosyncrasies.
TarynsEyes
June 08, 2025 at 08:35 am
"Many might ask the question, "Well then, why was he even on the field?" To that, I would argue that sometimes with a player like Kenny Clark, you take him at 70% over nothing at all. He can still manage a productive season, and you still want to keep him involved".
So, you're implying that the backup to Clark, whomever it is at any given time, for any given game, is less than a 70% version of Clark, That player shouldn't be on the team, and speaks to drop off from starter to backup. This doesn't exclude the fact that if Clark is at 70%, and other than that 'common core' math, is as close to failure as one can get, grade wise as to needed production.
Leatherhead
June 08, 2025 at 09:27 am
Taryn. 2/3 of the players in the NFL are average. 1/6 are below average and are usually at the bottom of the roster. 1/6 are above average, and are starters, stars, and Pro Bowlers.
So you shouldn't have a rookie on the team who isn't 70% of a Pro Bowler? I don't think that's possible.
TarynsEyes
June 08, 2025 at 10:28 am
Let's take the number 1000, so 2/3 is 666 are average and 1/6 (166) are above average, and another 1/6 (166) are below average, so 166 below average divided by 32 =5,1 per team. On the 53-man roster, with 45 active on game day, why would GB have a player active that is below average? That's half of the practice squad. Are all the average players hurt? Do the Packers have more below league average players than other teams? You're using stats, and I'm using stats, where does your reason come from as to the drop from starter to below average that needs to be active on game day. Mine is simple, they have a lot more below average guys on the team than some others. This does not mean some teams don't have more, but by how the seasons play out for at least 10 teams, the usual names, the Packers are closer to being average at best with a chance for the last playoff spot, and with a possible lean toward lesser.
The 11 wins last year did them no benefit, but only to allow you and others of the same ilk, to continue thinking it isn't a problem, or that there is one at all.
LLCHESTY
June 08, 2025 at 11:08 am
LH is way off. There's 2208 players on the 53 and PS at any one time and a lot more than ⅙ of them are below average. The Packers are above average in talent but their still going to have below average players on the roster, especially at a position that's very hard to find talent. The Eagles were the only team last year that was above average at DT in terms of talent and depth and they had one player drafted 9th overall and two drafted 13th overall. Now they lost two good players off that team and there goes the depth.
The Packers had DTs good at rushing the passer and DTs good at stopping the run but Clark was the only one on the roster last year that was good at both. Taking the 70% as gospel is foolish, only the team knows how close he was to full health. So no, it's not easy to replace a good injured DT with a backup and expect production.
Leatherhead
June 08, 2025 at 05:17 pm
Why would we include guys who aren't on the field?
Read my post. 45 guys.
I also wonder what is average for you. Is it 16 or 17, or is there a broader group. 32 teams......12-20 is average, 21-32 is below average and 1-11 is above average.
I stand by the math. You have 45 guys on your team. Most of them are average-ish, some are above, and some are below. I don't want to get into standard deviations but that's what your'e looking at. You're always trying to replace the below guys, of course, but the fate of your season is in those top 8 guys or so.
Leatherhead
June 08, 2025 at 05:11 pm
No, let's take 32 teams times 45 guys on the active roster.(not counting the kicker/holder, snapper)
32 x 45 = 1440
And you aren't comparing starters to practice squad. You're comparing our starters to every other team in the league, and that's who you suit up and play against each other.
Out of 1440, that would leave the bottom 1/6 (16%) with about 240 players, evenly distributed, leaving 7 or 8 guys on the practice squad.
But so did every body else. Eventually, you're down to the guys you're going to put on the field that game, just like everybody else. And of those , 30 of them are going to be average starters, because 30 is 2/3 of 45. We'll have another 15, including our weakest 8, and our strongest 8 (Love, Jacobs, Tom, Jenkins, Cooper, McKinney, Clark, Gary. That's the top 1/6....the best players you have.
1,,,,,,,,,,8,,,,,,,,,,,,,,16,,,,,,,,,,,,,,24,,,,,,,,,,,,,,32,,,,,,,,,,,,,,40.........48
However, I don't think that's the best way of looking at it. I think it's better to separate out the kicker/punter/snapper and go with 45.
Do I think we've got a pretty good top 15? Yes, I do. In addition to the guys I mentioned above, add in Walker and Kraft . Add in Reed. Add in Bullard, and Quay Walker, and Nixon, and VanNess
Even if you look at our middle group, we have guys like Enagbare, Valentine, Williams, Hobbs, Rhyan, Wilson, Wicks, Doubs, Wyatt, Musgrave, Hobbs, McDuffie, Cox, Brooks.
Football rosters are no different than anything else....the Standard Distribution reigns. We're not going to "out-talent" 31 other teams over a 17 game season and then playoffs. That's not the path. The path is to maximize your main guys. Just like a band. Why didn't Van Halen feature more cowbell solos? Because they had Eddie Van Halen, that's why!!!
If the top of our roster....Love, Jones, etc., stay healthy and play well, it really isn't going to matter if the #42 guy on the roster is a below average NFL starter (unless you give him a chance to cost you the game on special teams).
Ilk? Seriously? 11 wins was enough to make the playoffs. What's the goal of the regular season? To make the playoffs, and have your guys healthy and playing well when the playoffs start.
We're a good team, with a good roster, and a good coach, and a good QB and a good RB. The defense is good. The offensive line is good. We're a good team; it's unfortunate you're unable to see that.
dblbogey
June 08, 2025 at 01:49 pm
Taryn apparently believes we should and could have a near pro bowl caliber back up at every position.
LLCHESTY
June 08, 2025 at 03:47 pm
And even then she'd find something to be negative about.
barutanseijin
June 08, 2025 at 05:03 pm
I think the assumption here is that there is something like a normal distribution of football ability, whatever that is. Maybe there is a normal distribution, but that’s over the whole population. Pro football players are all on the very right end of the graph. The distribution of “ability” in the pros is more like a very few players of great ability and very many players with less skill.
Leatherhead
June 08, 2025 at 05:25 pm
No, the pool is redistributed. 1st grade, 5th grade, high school, college, grade school, Ph.D.....You keep having to recalibrate. You don't get to continue to compare yourself to a 1st grader.
Obviously, these are the best players in the world, but that's not the pool. The pool is guys in the NFL, or starters in the NFL.
barutanseijin
June 09, 2025 at 08:03 pm
[ Pro Football Talent Distribution ]
xxx
xxx xxx
xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
x-axis: talent
y-axis: population
No way is there a normal distribution of talent in the pros. the majority of guys get one contract and are gone in less than three years. On the other end of the spectrum you have Tom Brady.
TKWorldWide
June 08, 2025 at 08:46 am
Scarcely was my armor damp before I scrolled down to give an immediate 👍.
Sometimes injuries are an excuse, sometimes they’re an explanation. Best thing for a player is to not get injured. If quality of play suffers, they get criticized. If they are unable to play, they get criticized. It’s a lose-lose.
TarynsEyes
June 08, 2025 at 09:07 am
Yes, but my issue with the article isn't about the injury, it's about why they had to keep him playing instead of being able to get healthy.
Bitternotsour
June 08, 2025 at 12:38 pm
Yes, the packers should have gone to the defensive tackle store and picked up an 80% of Kenny Clark replacement. They're out there for the taking.
TKWorldWide
June 08, 2025 at 01:58 pm
Yeah I wasn’t refuting your point. Remember when DeVondre Campbell was making his exit and tweeted (or whatever) something about “I’m never gonna play hurt again and get thrown under the bus” or something similar? I mean, whose performance wouldn’t suffer at least to some degree while playing hurt? I also know that after the first game or two, NOBODY is 100%. So the whole thing is a treacherous, slippery slope.
NFLfan
June 08, 2025 at 08:47 am
Clark knew he had a bunion and spurs. Both take years to develop and are obvious as the foot starts to look malformed. Anyone can Google what a foot with a bunion looks like. He should have taken care of it last offseason. The man is being paid millions and that is the least he could have done.
LVN could have hired a DL coach off-season and attempted to perfect 1-2 additional moves. Did he? Is he physically incapable? GB has too many players who are given 3-4 years to 'get it' and most of them are first-round picks. If LVN was a 'one-off' I would be less concerned, but I can name 7-8 players who never 'got it' though they were stubbornly placed on the field to the detriment of other, better players. These excuses keep Green Bay compromised.
Should we baby doctors? Pilots?
Leatherhead
June 08, 2025 at 09:28 am
Do you have any idea of how much training pilots and doctors get? They aren't 23 year olds a year or two out of college.
TarynsEyes
June 08, 2025 at 10:00 am
Seriously, you're comparing the training of Doctors and pilots to football players? Get a grip on your football is the hardest thing to do mentality. Yes, it's a hard game, get some better context comparison.
NFLfan
June 08, 2025 at 12:31 pm
I am making a point-not everyone is going to succeed in the NFL. This is a billion dollar industry; 'early and often' weeding out is a requirement. We don't have to wring our hands. GB (Gutekunst) refuses to cut their/his losses
re: sub-par players because the great majority are his early-rounders and he doesn't wish to take responsibility for those failures. I can almost guarantee Green Bay will not be up to the challenge next season as there are too few (2-3) play-makers and a HC who loses his mind every game because he is stretched too thin and refuses authentic offensive play-calling assistance. Bisaccia is not that person. (Bisaccia should have been let go last year-he's over-paid and under-performing-ST's are not improving)
Green Bay used to be excellent-at least the QB/receivers and LT were. That is not the case anymore.
I expect the usual apologists to gnash their teeth and submit scathing retorts. Whatever. I don't believe in spin control.
It is the truth and I want better for Green Bay.
LLCHESTY
June 08, 2025 at 04:16 pm
Who are the subpar players you'd like to see gone?
Leatherhead
June 09, 2025 at 08:08 am
That was NFL troll who suggested pilots and doctors. I went with his comparison.
Even in the military, 2nd Lieutenants are not expected to come in and be big contributors. They're expected to learn and develop. Just like football players right out of college.
NFLfan
June 08, 2025 at 12:27 pm
.
LeotisHarris
June 08, 2025 at 10:27 am
Someone needs to bring Doug and Dinsdale Piranha into this discussion before it's too late.
Bitternotsour
June 08, 2025 at 12:41 pm
your call for whithering sarcasm is answered. someone here is going to be pulling off their own heads if I see my way clear.
Turophile
June 08, 2025 at 02:46 pm
Lets hope they don't run into Spiny Norman......
barutanseijin
June 08, 2025 at 05:05 pm
Dins…dale!
LLCHESTY
June 08, 2025 at 04:14 pm
Obscure reference but thanks for that. I've seen the movies but haven't seen many of the shows other than the famous skits. Went directly from Google to YouTube.
Biting sarcasm>>>some of the negativity around here!
LLCHESTY
June 08, 2025 at 10:32 am
Clark could well have a bounce back year(finished 8th in sacks among DTs in '23) but the fact still remains they can't keep him in '26 at his current salary and shifting money around simply makes the pain of letting him go worse down the line. It was the perfect draft to bring in his eventual replacement and the failure to do so could be costly. In an early list of top 50 players in next year's draft there's only one DT over 310 lbs and he's a predicted top 10-15 player. Finding a DT that's good vs the run and pass to replace Clark won't be easy, made harder by not taking advantage of the deepest DT in years.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 09, 2025 at 12:30 am
The rest of the NFL wanted Days this draft as well, leading to lesser talent being over drafted. I’m glad they didn’t go that route. There was a run on the best ones. Maybe they pick up a veteran cut at the end of cuts.
LLCHESTY
June 09, 2025 at 09:19 am
The opportunity cost be way higher next year, or there could be no availability at all for players that aren't one dimensional. At a premium position it's always better to pick from the land of plenty than a land of one or none.