Hello Wisconsin: Skidding Into Soldier Field (Again)

It's Packers/Bears III and the Packers need to stop the slide.

It’s been a brutal stretch for the Packers ever since halftime of the Denver game.

The team is now 0-4 in its last four contests, with a whole bunch of injuries added on to the pile. The team is entering the playoffs with absolutely no momentum for the second season in a row–even less this year than last.

I was curious about a history of teams that ended the season on 0-4 or worse stretches but still made the playoffs, and I could only find three examples:

  • The 1986 New York Jets finished the season with FIVE consecutive losses and end their season 10-6. They actually ended up winning in the wild card round against the Chiefs, but then lost in double overtime in the divisional round against the Jets.
  • The 1999 Detroit Lions lost their final four games to finish 8-8, then got immediately bounced in the wild card round by Washington.
  • The 2024 Pittsburgh Steelers lost their final four games to finish 10-7, then got immediately bounced in the wild card round by Baltimore.

So as you can see, history isn’t particularly kind  to teams in the Packers’ situation. Yes, there are some slight differences between this edition of the Packers and those teams, but there also isn’t a very large sample size of teams that lost four straight games to close the season and still made the playoffs. 

So with the Packers skidding back into Soldier Field, what are some realistic expectations for this team?

Well, on the bright side, this is the most wide open either conference has been in years. There are not any dominant teams in the NFL, and especially in the AFC, many of the traditional contenders are noticeably absent from the tournament.

In the NFC, the defending champions are still there, but nobody is fearing them. The Rams were seen as a possible juggernaut at one point in the season, but have struggled of late. The Bears have lost three of their last five, including two straight, and the Packers have no reason at all to fear them based on their two matchups this season. These teams are evenly matched with perhaps even a slight edge to Green Bay. The 49ers are a dark horse and could surprise people. The Seahawks have an outstanding defense and capable offense; people will continue to doubt them simply because of Sam Darnold, but it’s time to recognize that Darnold has played at a very high level for back to back seasons on two different 14-win teams.

So, realistically, I think the Packers are capable of pushing deeper into the postseason. They have a favorable draw in the first game with a team they already know they can beat (they did so once already, and should have done so a second time). On any given Sunday, even without Micah Parsons, I see no reason why they couldn’t surprise some of the other teams seeded ahead of them.

Of course, the odds are against a deep run or a title push, but anything can happen in January, especially after you get out of that wild card round. 

In this way, the Packers probably have the most favorable position of any of those four-straight loss teams that have previously made the playoffs. Which, of course, is not exactly saying much. But it’s something to consider, anyway.

Does momentum matter? Heck yeah it does. Let’s not discount that. There’s a sort of innate belief that builds up within a person and a team when it’s made a habit of achieving at a high level. But let’s also not discount the variance that exists in professional football and the ability of these high-end athletes to turn it on when needed.

Here’s to the Packers doing exactly that on Saturday evening in Chicago.

Wisconsin Beer of the Week

Wisconsin residents and many beyond know New Glarus Brewing Company to be the brewery that makes SPotted Cow, but there are a whole lot of other offerings from the brewery that are equally good or better. One of my favorite things the brewery does is its Thumbprint series, which are its high-quality, slightly more limited release beers or beers that are a bit more difficult to brew.

One of these is Framboise, and I picked up the 2025 edition from Woodman’s this past weekend. And hoo boy is it yummy.

This limited-release Belgian-style fruit beer features sour ales blended with fresh raspberries. It’s a great beer for over the holidays especially, but it tastes good at any time of year. Usually it’s released in the late fall and early winter specifically for the holidays.

The beer rates very highly on Untappd; it’s sweet and flavorful without being overwhelming or having that sickly sweet feel. At just four percent ABV you don’t have to worry about it overpowering you, and there’s no bitterness at all. 

Of your various fruited sours, this is definitely of the more traditional variety. Highly recommend, especially if you like beers like New Glarus’s Raspberry Tart or Wisconsin Belgian Red. 

Matchups to watch against the Bears

It’s only fitting that the Packers will have to win a rubber match with the Bears to extend their season. The two games the team has played have been very different; the pre-Parsons and post-Parsons eras may as well be two different seasons. And yet in both games, the Packers handled the Bears from start to… well, almost finish, in the case of the second.

Here’s where the Packers are going to have to succeed to be able to win this game:

  • Packers defensive front versus Bears offensive line: Rashan Gary simply has to be better. He’s been invisible in the absence of Parsons and has likely played himself out of Green Bay. But he’s still on the team at the moment, and still being paid to be an elite pass rusher. He must have a strong game, and the other big bodies along the line need to hold their own and avoid getting pushed around; otherwise, the Bears could easily control the clock with their running game.
  • Packers’ cornerbacks in coverage: It’s been rough going for Keisean Nixon and Carrington Valentine since the Packers’ pass rush evaporated. The presence of Micah Parsons was masking just how overmatched these corners are. They’re going to need to be able to play solid defense even if the pass rush doesn’t get home. 
  • Christian Watson versus the Bears’ secondary: All of the Packers’ pass catchers are important, but none more so than Christian Watson. He is the team’s biggest matchup nightmare (especially in the absence of Tucker Kraft), and could cement himself as a true number one receiver with a dominant postseason performance. He is capable of having an excellent game against this Bears secondary.
  • Packers’ offensive line versus Bears’ defensive front in the run game: The Packers need to be able to control the clock themselves, and have had a tough time getting the ground game going of late. The offensive line had a couple rough outings, and need to be able to get some push in the run game to make the Packers’ offense multi-dimensional.

This is a game the Packers can win, but it’s going to be a tight one. Critical matchups like these will be the difference maker.

Expect LaFleur and Gutekunst to both be back

If you didn’t see Justis Mosqueda’s excellent analysis of the Packers’ coaching and GM situation and the decision Ed Policy is likely to make this offseason, do yourself a favor and check it out

Justis agrees with the reporting of Adam Schefter that it is likely that Policy will extend both Gutekunst and LaFleur this offseason. The details of that extension, of course, are going to be very interesting to see; how long will the extension be? Will we get any of the details about compensation amounts? Remember that coaching salaries frequently are not made public, at least not immediately.

Justis’s article goes into detail about some of the decisions the Packers have made with coaching in the past, largely due to a need to remain fiscally conservative with that pool of money. For this reason, he says, an extension of LaFleur could be less about belief in LaFleur’s ability to lead the team to a title than it could be about financial implications. See the article for more.

Ultimately, I have been saying all season that one of two things will happen this offseason: Policy will either fire or extend both LaFleur and Gutekunst. Their contracts expire after the 26-27 season, and teams almost never allow coaches or GMs to go into a season as lame ducks (see what happened with Mike McCarthy in Dallas as one recent example of this rarity occurring and why teams would rather avoid it). As long as the Packers made the playoffs, it was always far more likely they would both be extended.

Anything short of a three-year extension, though, would raise my eyebrows. It would be a less-than-full-throated endorsement of LaFleur and Gutekunst as the leaders of this team into the future, and an indication that perhaps Policy does have both men on a bit of a short leash.

Around the NFC North

As always, it’s time to go around the NFC North. 

  • The CHICAGO BEARS ended up losing their last two games, exactly as I predicted they would when I said the Packers would still win the division after losing to this team. Unfortunately, the Packers decided to not show up to play against Baltimore, which ended their hopes and resulted in a meaningless week 18 contest. The Bears are 2-3 in their last five games taking on a Packers team that is 1-4 in their last five games this weekend. A real barn burner. But the postseason results in extra juice, and given what we’ve already seen in the teams’ first two matchups, that could make for a particularly spicy affair. While the intensity certainly cannot match an NFC Championship contest between these two teams, it’s most definitely going to be quite the atmosphere for this one.

 

  • The DETROIT LIONS end the season on the outside of the playoffs, but at least managed to take a final parting shot at the Bears before doing so. As it turns out, losing both coordinators in a single offseason is a large hurdle to overcome, and that’s before considering Detroit’s offensive line ineptitude. There was a significant brain drain this past year, more than Dan Campbell and this team were able to overcome. It will be extremely interesting to see whether the Lions are able to return to the upper echelon of the conference in 2026 or if who they were this year is much closer to what their true identity will be moving forward.

 

  • The MINNESOTA VIKINGS beat the Packers’ JV squad to end the season with a winning record, marking just the second time since realignment that there has been a division where all four teams had a winning record. The fact that this team was able to win as many games as it did with a quarterback situation this terrible is a testament to head coach Kevin O’Connell. However, it’s only going to get harder for Minnesota moving forward. Not only do they not have a quarterback, but their financial situation is awful and they’re also rapidly aging. With how much this team’s starters struggled against the Packers’ third string early on in the contest, things could get pretty rough for the Vikings in the near future. 

Mr. Backes’s “This or That”

Every day I put a different “this or that” poll up on my whiteboard and have students leave tallies throughout the day. I then compile this information and post it here for laughs. However, this week we’re out all week (and next) on Winter Break. There are only a few updates since we just got back from Winter Break:

  • Driving in rain defeated driving in snow
  • A relaxing winter break defeated a busy winter break
  • Stranger Things defeated Euphoria

Wild Card Weekend

Look, as bad as it’s been for the Packers over the last four weeks, you’re out of your skull if you think I’m ever picking the Bears to beat the Packers. Not only that, but I genuinely think this Packer team is better. They’ve handled the Bears for about seven and a half quarters of football this season. They’ll do it again.

Packers 27, Bears 23

THE REST:

RAMS over Panthers
PACKERS over Bears

JAGUARS over Bills

49ERS over Eagles

PATRIOTS over Chargers

TEXANS over Steelers

Setting up the following divisional round matchups:

 

Packers at Seahawks

Rams at 49ers

Jaguars at Patriots

Texans at Broncos

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Tim Backes is a lifelong Packer fan and a contributor to CheeseheadTV. Follow him on Twitter @timbackes for his Packer takes, random musings and Untappd beer check-ins.

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (24)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
dobber's picture

January 08, 2026 at 08:04 am

"The team is now 0-4 in its last four contests, with a whole bunch of injuries added on to the pile."

As others have stated, this is pretty much the team you'd expected them to have finished 2025 with--with the interspersed injuries that happen over the course of the season--Wyatt, Kraft, Jenkins--and largely the same team that outplayed the Bears for 50-some minutes a couple weeks ago in crappy weather in Chicago. The weather will be crappy again with gusty winds (it's looking like the rain and snow will pass prior to kickoff), but those winds didn't seem to slow down either teams last time. We'll see some new wrinkles from both teams, but as the Vikings showed: just because the Ravens and Derrick Henry ran roughshod over the Packers, it doesn't mean everyone can do it.

If the last matchup is any indication, the Bears will come out playing with their hair on fire (and delivering Dennis Allen's questionable shots on defense). Packers need to weather the storm, make plays, and put up TDs. This team can beat the Bears, and has tended to play its best football against better opponents this season. It just struggles to keep it all together for 60 minutes.

"The details of that extension, of course, are going to be very interesting to see; how long will the extension be?...Anything short of a three-year extension, though, would raise my eyebrows. "

If the Packers' front office is lukewarm on LaF or Gute, they could lowball or offer an extension (as you point out in duration) that is ahead of their previous compensation but nowhere near what would be regarded as their "market value" with the idea that a resignation might happen. That would be pretty passive aggressive, though, and likely would lead to a prolonged negotiation and hard feelings that would put the Packers in a much later and riskier search window if they needed to find either a HC or GM and picking from the leftovers.

"The CHICAGO BEARS ended up losing their last two games"

They should've lost their last 4.
Teams that play like the Bears do might win a playoff game or even two, but tend to crash and burn pretty dynamically to land short of the goal. You can't live on turnovers, forcing FGs in the red zone, and fourth quarter comebacks before a team doesn't give you the TOs you need and steps on your throat at the same time. I'd argue this has a lot to do with why they're not being taken very seriously in Vegas in their SB odds, and why they're headed for a serious regression in 2026 (barring significant personnel changes, especially on defense).

LIONS--yes, have had to overcome injuries the last couple years, but they haven't been able to figure out their CB situation, and they're starting to struggle with paying their young players. They really missed Sam LaPorta in that offense, and not having Branch and Joseph down the stretch was a problem, too, so I wouldn't write them off completely in 2026. Their DL should be very good. If Taylor Decker retires, they'll have at least two if not three pretty significant holes to fill on the OL, and I expect they'll be drafting OL pretty heavy next spring.

VIKINGS--the roster is getting older. The cap is a problem. The front-line players are good, but they'll be releasing (or retiring) guys this offseason to gain some breathing room in the cap--you can't keep dealing picks for aging vets, and buying aging FA vets, and not have it come back to get you in reduced cap space and weak depth. With the weak HC market this off-season, I expect Flores will get interviews, but he's got an uphill climb given his sparring with the league. Either way, there will be teams that outbid the Vikes for his services, and he'll be missed for that defense. McCarthy was a McStake. The rebuild they should've undertaken 3-4 years ago should starts in earnest at the 2026 draft.

"They’ve handled the Bears for about seven and a half quarters of football this season. They’ll do it again. Packers 27, Bears 23."

IF the Packers beat the Bears, and I'm about 50-50 on it, I suspect it will look a lot like the Dallas game from a few years ago.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

January 08, 2026 at 08:26 am

I don’t think it will be a blowout. But I do think we’ll win. I think we will execute in the red zone, get out to a big lead, and weather the storm down the stretch. 31-27. Then we are playing with house money in Seattle. Don’t really care past this weekend. I don’t think we can win it all with our injuries. Just beat the ever loving blasted Bears!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

January 08, 2026 at 08:59 am

Just saying that when the Bears get beat in the playoffs, I think it's likely to be a pretty spectacular fail.

"Then we are playing with house money in Seattle. "

I'm not a believer in the 'house money' thing in the playoffs, especially for a team with pretty high expectations earlier in the season. We can point to the injuries, but the personnel is there if they can play 60 minutes of football.

" Just beat the ever loving blasted Bears!"

Amen, brother!

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

January 08, 2026 at 08:55 am

Dobber, if a team doesn’t believe in its HC or GM (or both) then lowballing seems like the worst possible course. If one has no faith in the ability of either to deliver, then have the courage to move on. If one believes, then pay them at a rate that fits comparatives in the league.

No team should settle for a person in either position that it doesn’t really believe in. This is sports: the point is to win, not simply turn up and long term performance bleeds into future prosperity too. If Policy can’t decide this or lacks the self-belief to commit to his belief, then we hired an apparatchik not a leader and the prospects are dim.

Mark Murphy reportedly earned over 11 million in 2023. That’s reportedly more than Gute and LaFleur earned combined. It’s also pretty high for a president of an organization of the Packers turnover and nearly what the top NFL coaches/GMs are paid. It’s therefore likely his successor is getting as much or more than his GM or HC.

There is a reason he’s paid that much and a significant part of that is to be able to make the critical organizational decisions (and mostly correctly). If not it’s merely crony hiring. I’m starting to wonder if Policy actually has what it takes. Decide (after the playoffs) and fully back that and pay what it takes. Fudging or indecision would be an extremely bad sign. These two are known commodities. Pick a path and commit.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

January 08, 2026 at 08:59 am

I don't disagree with you.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

January 08, 2026 at 08:30 am

"..skidding into Soldier Field.." made me think of Running Back to Saskatoon. Enjoy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79WIkr4F-Lc&list=RD79WIkr4F-Lc&start_rad...

GPG

0 points
0
0
TXCHEESE's picture

January 08, 2026 at 10:35 am

I bet I haven't listened to that in 20 years. Good band, great tune.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

January 08, 2026 at 10:57 am

Burton Cummings (Guess Who), might be my favorite vocalist ever. He’s from Winnipeg.
I grew up about 20 yards from the Saskatchewan border and not far from Saskatoon—the home of Gordie Howe, my favorite hockey player.
Thanks Leotis.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

January 08, 2026 at 01:35 pm

What a great story, Starrbrite.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

January 08, 2026 at 03:16 pm

Leotis, One of my huge regrets was not seeing the Guess Who in concert. I saw Bachman Turner Overdrive (BTO) in Regina, Sask., but not the same as hearing Cummings Live.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 08, 2026 at 08:49 am

Ed Policy is not signaling the energy, vision and drive required to take this talented team (with fairly big, expensive holes, ie., CB, OL, DL) to the next level. Realistically, that would involve a more dynamic, GM/HC duo with proven records, willingness to make the difficult/necessary decisions re: coaching hires/fires, sounder early round Draft choices, better, more expensive Coordinators/coaches and tougher accountability standards.
The Murphy/Policy duo does not over-prioritize the excellence of the team, they kind of fold it into the entire Titletown endeavor which appears to be the greater focus. (There is pre-occupation with keeping the Packers in GB and not allowing a move to a larger market which may account for this preoccupation)
Policy, IMO, is keeping the ship, which includes the team and Titletown, sailing on a comfortable path, free of turbulence-(new GM/HC and their possible demands).This approach will keep the team above average-but not SB contenders.

Notice how other teams are more willing to fire HC's, many of whom are superior to MLF? There is less tolerance
for not winning.

0 points
0
0
TXCHEESE's picture

January 08, 2026 at 10:37 am

Outside of possibly John Harbaugh, what coach(es) fired this year or last are superior to MLF?

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 08, 2026 at 10:43 am

I was including Harbaugh and would add Stefanski and possibly R.Morris. My point is most NFL teams do not retain 'up-and-down' coaches/GM's) as long as GB does.

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

January 08, 2026 at 11:40 am

It doesn't matter who might be better. LaFleur brings a seventh seed mentality, ability and futility to the Packers. We know what he is so let the Packers, at least try to, bring in someone better.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

January 08, 2026 at 10:12 am

"The team is now 0-4 in its last four contests, with a whole bunch of injuries added on to the pile. The team is entering the playoffs with absolutely no momentum for the second season in a row–even less this year than last."

While they did lose 4 in a row, we need to keep things in perspective. The Broncos game they lost Parsons and Watson and the whole game fell apart after that. The next game against the Bears, Love gets concussed and was out. And not only that but Willis got hurt in that game as well. The Ravens game, Willis already hurt, hurts his shoulder again, and has to come out of the game after leading them on a drive. The game immediately changed when Tune threw and interception. And the final game was treated as a preseason game.

They lost 4 games, and Love missed 2 1/2 of them. Willis got hurt in one and played as long as he could in the other.

I'm oddly not worried about losing 4 in a row as odd as that sounds.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 08, 2026 at 10:44 am

It's the 'every year barely make it to the Play-offs' recurring theme.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

January 08, 2026 at 10:47 am

This is off-topic, but makes my blood boil. The Packers/Bears match-up will be exclusively on Prime Video. If you don't subscribe, TS. This sucks. Big time. This is just a continuing example of how over the top greedy the NFL is getting. That they slapped their season ticket holders with PSL's. Force them to buy all the "pre-season" (exhibition) games, charge for parking, and gouge people for merchandise is awful. Then they moan that people are selling their tickets to opponents fans, as if getting money for a game is the exclusive right of the NFL, not the regular person.
Now this nonsense with streaming services having exclusive rights to games. This is the tip of the iceberg. There will come a time when they decide that a "playoffs package" should be auctioned off to the highest bidder. A separate auction will decide which streaming service. And at first, this cost will be relatively low. But each year, the price will increase, until the cost of watching the playoffs and SB will be literally a couple of hundred dollars (not adjusted for inflation).
Will this be the final insult that fans refuse to take? Will they rebel? Or will they be forced to charge "guests" a fee to watch the game with you? Mark Cuban already started the NFL is getting too greedy, and warned, "Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered." And right now, the NFL has both trotters in the trough.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

January 09, 2026 at 03:42 pm

An update. I got an e-mail from Prime Video telling me I could sign up for their service to watch the Packers game Saturday night. I deleted it, and opted out of any further communication with them. This is a personal decision. If anyone decides to pay to watch the game, that is your business, and I will not criticize your decision. But for me, I'll stay out of the loop and watch the rerun on the NFL Channel at 11 PM CST Saturday night.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

January 08, 2026 at 11:14 am

Hey Tim, speaking of fruit sours, have you tried "Caramel Apple Sucker" from Stubborn Brothers Brewery in Green Bay? It really tastes like a caramel apple!

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 08, 2026 at 11:25 am

Agree with Ricky-though I very much wish to watch the game, I got rid of Amazon (can't stand Bezos) years ago and also resent that the NFL will not show it on network TV.
I did sign up for Paramount to watch a recent Packer game and STILL could not watch it as it was 'out of area'
Couldn't wait to cancel them within the week.
Not many Packer games are shown in CA.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

January 08, 2026 at 03:03 pm

I feel for ya. I grew up and worked in cities where the packers were an afterthought; especially Denver. Couldn’t put up my dish because of covenant rules and had to attend a Packer bar. Then spent several years in southern Georgia. The NFL ticket cured my trouble there, but ut now this additional streaming BS makes me furious. I have YouTube, but I hate it. Directv I thought was much better.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

January 08, 2026 at 03:10 pm

Also lived in San Diego (mid-80’s) for a few years and seldom ever saw the packers. Drive me nuts, although I loved San Diego.

0 points
0
0
TheBigCat's picture

January 08, 2026 at 01:29 pm

Tim: After reading Mosqueda's 1/5 post, I have greater empathy for the Packers coaching staff. The Packers organization just does not deep enough pockets to hire the very best positional coaches, so you get what you pay for regarding player development, etc. However, knowing that then I believe the HC needs to assume some of those deficient responsibilities, and hand off the development the weekly game plan to the DC and OC (who will also call the plays).

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 08, 2026 at 02:27 pm

Murphy and Gutekunst get paid very well

0 points
0
0