Nine Months to Transform the Green Bay Packers Defense

The Green Bay Packers defense is a rapidly improving unit. It's taken a series of changes over the course of nine months to make it happen.

Packers defenders Mike Neal and Mike Daniels sack Patriots quarterback Tom Brady by Jeff Hanisch—USA TODAY Sports.

Packers defenders Mike Neal and Mike Daniels sack Patriots quarterback Tom Brady by Jeff Hanisch—USA TODAY Sports.

The Green Bay Packers defense may not be the best in the NFL. Not by a long shot.

But it's leaps and bounds better than a year ago.

The improvements made in some of the most frequently cited statistics may be modest, such as total defense and scoring defense.

The Packers finished the 2013 season ranked 25th and 24th in each respective category, allowing an average of 372.3 yards per game and 26.8 points per game.

By comparison, this season the Packers currently rank 25th in total defense (366.8 ypg) and 15th in scoring defense (22.2 ppg).

In other, more important statistical categories, however, they're a Top 10 defense, in categories that have a greater impact on the outcome of a game.

The Packers currently rank fourth in the NFL in turnovers forced (23) and seventh in opponent passer rating (82.0).

With a quarter of the season left to go, the Packers have already forced more turnovers than they did all of last season (22), which ranked 21st in the NFL. They also ranked 25th in the NFL last season in opponent passer rating (95.9).

Combined with an offense that avoids turning the ball over (a league-leading eight giveaways) and a quarterback (Aaron Rodgers) that leads the league in passer rating (118.6), it's no wonder the Packers are tied for the best record in the NFL (9-3).

It wasn't an overnight process for the Packers to transform their defense. It's taken time and come gradually, over the course of months.

Like the improvement by the Packers run defense, headway has come slowly. Exiting the bye week, the Packers ranked dead last in the NFL, allowing an average of 153.5 yards per game. They've slowly been climbing out of the basement ever since, improving by an average of more than 20 yards per game in the month of November, currently ranked 28th and allowing 132.3 yards per game.

Remodeling and overhauling the Packers defense has also been a total team effort, from decisions made by the front office to those made by the coaching staff to individual contributions by the players.

The following are 16 decisions and changes made in chronological order since the end of the 2013 season that have transformed the Packers defense from one of the league's worst into a unit that is rapidly improving and the arrow is only pointing up:

 

Mar. 8, Re-sign Sam Shields: Just days before the start of free agency, the Packers re-signed Shields, and it didn't come cheap. An average salary of $9.75 million over the length of his contract ranks sixth in the NFL among cornerbacks. But by signing Shields, the Packers kept intact one of the deepest groups of cornerbacks in the NFL. His coverage ability on the perimeter and deep speed are the best on the team.

 

Mar. 11, Tender Jamari Lattimore and Non-Tender M.D. Jennings: On the deadline to extend offers to their restricted free agents, the Packers decided they'd part ways with the weak link in their secondary and retain the services of a role player at linebacker. The Packers got very little out of Jennings in 2013, and nothing in the way of impact plays, such as interceptions, sacks or forced fumbles. Lattimore's impact on the 2014 has been minimal, but they're a better team with him than without him.

 

Mar. 13 & 14, Re-sign Mike Neal and B.J. Raji on Back-to-Back Days: Despite both players eligible for unrestricted free agency, the Packers re-signed both to relatively modest contracts for a being second and first round draft choices, respectively. Raji was injured during the preseason and placed on season-ending injured reserve, but Neal has been a contributing members of the Packers defense, having a hand in four sacks this season.

 

Mar. 15, Sign Julius Peppers: By signing Peppers, a lifelong 4-3 defensive end, the Packers showed they could be flexible under defensive coordinator Dom Capers and at least occasionally fit his system to the talents of his players and not the other way around. Like Shields, Peppers didn't come cheap. But having a hand in a team-leading six sacks and two pick-sixes, he's so far been worth every penny of the three-year, $26 million contract they paid him.

 

Mar. 17 Sign Letroy Guion: Agreeing to a mere one-year, $1 million contract, Guion's signing barely registered a blip on the radar of the national media. But with a hand in three sacks this season, he's already offered more pass rush in 12 games than Raji had in the previous two seasons combined. And that's not to mention the solid job he's done as a run stuffer.

 

Offseason, Letting Ryan Pickett and Johnny Jolly Walk: The Packers made a philosophical shift in the offseason, parting ways with a pair of defensive linemen over 30 years old and over 325 lbs. Instead, they decided to go with younger, lighter and quicker defensive linemen, adapting to the changing spread-out landscape of the NFL where mobility is becoming a more important asset than girth.

 

May 8, Draft Ha Ha Clinton-Dix: When Ryan Shazier and C.J. Mosley came off the board ahead of the Packers pick in the first round of the NFL Draft, the Packers pulled the trigger on Clinton-Dix to improve a safety position that failed to account for a single interception in 2013. The Alabama product has been infinitely more physical than Jennings, who lined up next to Morgan Burnett a year ago.

 

May 12, Sign Mike Pennel and Jayrone Elliott: Among the players the Packers signed as rookie free agents in the immediate aftermath of the NFL Draft were a pair of future contributors. Their impact may be modest thus far, but the Packers appear to have gained more confidence in Pennel and Elliott by the week and have carved out small roles for them this season.

 

Aug. 18, Trade Jerel Worthy: When Worthy was eventually cut by the New England Patriots, the Packers would get nothing in return for their trade. But more more important was the decision to part ways with a player that turned out to be a bust and stop investing into his development. Worthy was a one-trick pony that could only rush the passer, and he wasn't a very good one at that.

 

Sept. 14, Debut the 4-3 defenseAlthough it's since gone into mothballs, perhaps because of ineffectiveness, the Packers started using a 4-3 defensive front with Clay Matthews as a true 4-3 strong-side linebacker in the season opener against the Seattle Seahawks and in the weeks that followed. At the very least, it showed that defensive coordinator Dom Capers was willing to be flexible, and even though it hasn't been seen since early in the season, the Packers now have it in their back pocket.

 

Early season, Roll out the NASCAR Package: In an effort to get all of their "Elephant" type players on the field at the same time, the Packers developed a personnel package that included Julius Peppers, Clay Matthews, Nick Perry and Mike Neal all rushing the passer at the same time. The package has been used only sparingly, and in some weeks not at all, but it's been a creative way to get some of the team's best pass rushers putting pressure on opposing quarterbacks.

 

Oct. 1-2, Allow Jumal Rolle to Sign with Texans, Promote Luther Robinson to Roster: Despite having an opening on their roster when linebacker Andy Mulumba was placed on injured reserve, the Packers declined to sign cornerback Jumal Rolle off their practice squad and instead saw him sign with the Houston Texans. A day later, the Packers promoted defensive lineman Luther Robinson. In his first career game, Robinson responded by hitting Vikings quarterback Christian Ponder as he released the football, resulting in an interception return for a touchdown by Peppers.

 

Oct. 19 Clinton-Dix Makes His First Start: Although Clinton-Dix played in every game since the start of the season, he didn't become a full-time player and starter on the Packers defense until Oct. 19 in their Week 7 game against the Carolina Panthers. Although previous starter Micah Hyde hadn't played poorly, Clinton-Dix has been a better fit at the safety position.

 

Nov. 9 Make Hyde the Primary Slot Cornerback: Wanting to keep Hyde involved on the defensive side of the football, the Packers took the bye week to make Hyde their primary slot cornerback ahead of Casey Hayward. Since the switch, Hyde has made interceptions in two of the past four games, while Hayward has still stayed involved in the team's dime defensive package.

 

Nov. 9 Use Clay Matthews at Inside LinebackerIt hasn't been a full-fledged transition to inside linebacker for Matthews. Although not a strict policy, they've been using him primarily on the inside on early downs and lining him up at his old outside linebacker spot on long down-and-distance situations to rush the passer. The move has also allowed the Packers to get their 11 best players on the field by getting Nick Perry more playing time at outside linebacker. Although injury has slowed Perry the past two games, he's playing the best football of his three-year career.

 

Nov. 30, Promote Sam Barrington, Demote A.J. Hawk: It remains to be seen if the change lasts, but it was a bold move by the Packers' coaching staff to take the longest tenured player on the Packers defense out of the starting lineup. The Packers had not willingly benched Hawk since the first game of the 2010 season. Barrington played well in an expanded role.

 

Brian Carriveau is the author of the book "It's Just a Game: Big League Drama in Small Town America," and editor at Cheesehead TV and its "Pro Football Draft Preview." To contact Brian, email [email protected].

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (18)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
4thand1's picture

December 02, 2014 at 03:41 pm

Every move takes time. If this defense can improve every week, I'll take a top 10 to 15 ranking. Besides, a lot of yards were given up in the garbage time blow out wins. A lot of the starters were sitting.

0 points
0
0
travis's picture

December 02, 2014 at 04:01 pm

I think Clay is better suited for the MLB position. He is faster and stronger at the point then anyone else. His outside rushing ability is great, but he's not as strong as say Nick Perry when holding blockers. He also is constantly over pursuing which I suppose allows other guys to attack, but Clay in the middle makes this defense work a lot better and I love it.

0 points
0
0
Amanofthenorth's picture

December 02, 2014 at 05:07 pm

They now tackle too. Or doesn't that count?

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

December 02, 2014 at 08:22 pm

Maybe with the helmet to helmet hits taken away, players are going away from the big hit and finally tackling. I still see a lot of players going low. Ask Sam Shields, he may miss a game or two.

0 points
0
0
murphy's picture

December 02, 2014 at 10:48 pm

It counts, though images of defensive backs bouncing high off of Gronk still haunt my daydreams.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

December 02, 2014 at 05:55 pm

I would still feel better with Raji at nose, I dont know his health status but I wonder if the Packers ever considered bringing Jolly back to play nose tackle, I guess we will find out if The Packers play a run heavy team in the playoffs . I just dont feel the Packers D line is big enough. This may sound crazy but Daniels is quick on his feet and I dont see why on say inside the red zone why he could not play the linebacker spot on run downs. call me crazy but you never know.

0 points
0
0
Packer_Pete's picture

December 02, 2014 at 06:13 pm

the topic Jolly is closed. Too old. Not good enough for what the Packers want to play. I do think the Packers DL are big enough to stop the run. Plus, if the O keeps scoring, it will make the opposing team one-dimensional in a hurry.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

December 03, 2014 at 11:18 am

Yea -- you're crazy.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

December 02, 2014 at 07:48 pm

Well perfect example will be the Seahawks . Heavy run , stingy defense , not be a good match up for the Packers D but then again no deep threat from the Seahawks so I guess a safety can play up to help against the run .

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

December 03, 2014 at 07:13 am

Also the Seahawks no longer have Harvin. Harvin has been a nightmare for the Packers defense.

The thing i like about the Packers matchup now against the Seahawks is in the read option part of it. With Mathews at ILB he will be able to see who has the ball and won't be stuck in between players.

0 points
0
0
Brian's picture

December 02, 2014 at 07:54 pm

While the article is very interesting I would suggest waiting until the season is over. To me, the playoffs will determine if any of these changes really worked.

0 points
0
0
HankScorpio's picture

December 03, 2014 at 06:24 am

I dunno. Tom Brady had the ball at the 20, needing the end zone to take the lead, and fire in his eyes. The Packers denied him the go ahead score he so desperately wanted. I can't believe that would have happened the last few years.

0 points
0
0
lucky953's picture

December 02, 2014 at 08:32 pm

I appreciate the chronology--it's interesting. The focus is on personnel decisions by management/coaching. A less apparent, but extremely important part of the change has been on-going player development. Mike Daniels and Nick Perry spring to mind as players who've improved markedly from last year. Mike Neal is also better at the "elephant" than last year. I'm sorry Mulumba is missing the year. It would have helped him next year. It makes me better understand that becoming an NFL player is a process that takes three years for most rookies, if they're going to make it (excepting the few that have extraordinary talent and maturity). As a fan, I'm grateful that we have a draft and develop management team. While there are the inevitable busts and disappointments, it's gratifying to see players get better with coaching and training, and then to gradually take on increasing roles with the team.

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

December 02, 2014 at 08:56 pm

WHAT! Don't you know that high priced FA's are the way to go. Look at the Bears, they've signed more FA's than any team over the last few years and they're the toast of Chicago. I agree with you by the way.

0 points
0
0
Gman1976's picture

December 03, 2014 at 11:49 am

It has been a great joy to see the coaches and front office make significant changes this year. Our men in high places have really not stayed in ruts that often mean the tailspin of a team. Another significant factor in our success is the health of key players on defense (as well as offense) this year. If Matthews & Peppers can stay healthy, we can go a long way to improving the defense. If this team can stay healthy, we will continue to see growth in our young players and growing improvement. I really this team can improve much more and that's a scary thing for our opponents (on both sides of the ball).

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

December 03, 2014 at 01:59 am

I agree with most of your points. In part, there has been an infusion of talent (Peppers, Clinton Dix, and Guion), some internal player development and some addition by subtraction. Signing FAs Guion and Peppers has worked, (one of whom is a high-priced FA, BTW), though I still hope that Peppers can be an even greater force in the postseason. Clinton-Dix is a sizable upgrade over Jennings, and it may have made Burnett a better player (or Burnett is continuing to develop). That also fits in the "addition by subtraction" category, since even without Clinton Dix, just getting rid of Jennings and plugging Hyde in would have improved the safety position. More addition by subtraction involved getting Raji off the field at DE, even if Boyd and Datone have not exactly lit it up, that position by default is better since Raji was a really terrible DE. Dumping Worthy has been addition by subtraction, since he was a waste of coaching time and of a roster spot. Perry has been healthier, or arguably has developed. Barrington, if he continues to play well, would fit into player development. The Luther Robinson point is a real, real stretch, and it remains to be seen whether keeping Robinson over Rolle was the right decision in the long term (I doubt it, personally). Signing Neal (with which I strongly agreed) has not been a rousing success, but not terrible either. He looks overpaid to me. The 4-3 under look has had its ups and downs, with the Nascar remains to be seen.

0 points
0
0
Imma Fubared's picture

December 04, 2014 at 12:26 pm

I've never agreed with the 'defenses win super bowl' adage. You look at the super bowls and the winners were always balanced with good offenses and defenses. Only the Ravens were the team that once won a superbowl based on pretty much stellar defensive play and mediocre offense.

With that said the Packer D is not good enough to get you through the playoffs. Its an ok D but nothing special. The Pack like the Pats, need to score points in bunches to win.
I still see lapses on the pass rush. Datone whether playing or not is MIA and Hawk is just running around out there jumping on piles. The inside run game suffers because of it.
You replace Hawk with a speedy linebacker and send Datone packing and get one more solid rusher and you will have improved the D tremendously.

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

December 04, 2014 at 01:44 pm

Hawk has been replaced, and Datone played a good game against the pats.

0 points
0
0