Packers' Cornerback Room Off to an Impressive Start

Keisean Nixon's Confidence is 'Through the Roof.'

Remember when the Packers let Jaire Alexander walk during the off-season, setting off a widespread gnashing of teeth across Green Bay fandom? Don’t look now, but it turns out the Packers’ cornerback room is pretty good even without Ja.

And the safeties are pretty darn good, too.

Heading to play a Browns offense averaging just 16.5 points per game (26th in the NFL), Green Bay looks poised to do more damage against a quarterback in Joe Flacco who is not just a statue in the pocket, but an elderly one. (Can you imagine Flacco trying to run from Micah Parsons? Sorry, I digress.)

Against the Washington Commanders last Thursday, Keisean Nixon played 14 snaps in man coverage. Five passes came his way, to the tune of zero receptions. All five of those incompletions were pass breakups on Nixon’s part, including a fourth-down breakup late in the game to help seal the win. 

Meanwhile, however much stock you put into Pro Football Focus grades, it’s still better to have a good grade than a bad one. On the very young season, Nixon has an 85.2 PFF coverage grade over 136 snaps – tied for first with the Jets’ Sauce Gardner, who is, well, pretty good.

Suddenly, it seems like a really long time ago that Nixon told reporters he didn’t want to return kicks anymore as the “CB1,” raising eyebrows across the country.

On the other outside corner is Carrington Valentine, the former seventh-round draft pick out of Kentucky. Valentine showed flashes as a rookie, exhibited tremendous growth last year, and even had an impressive interception in the end zone in a Week 15 tilt with the Seahawks.

Through two weeks this season, he is graded at 79.3 in coverage by PFF, good for seventh in the NFL.

Nate Hobbs, the off-season acquisition by General Manager Brian Gutekunst, is back in the fold after sitting out most of training camp and Week 1 with an injury. Over just 36 defensive snaps, his PFF coverage grade sits at 71.3, which is about six points shy of making the Top 10.

Rookie Micah Robinson hasn’t played any snaps yet, but he looked the part in the preseason, and during his final year at Tulane, he was graded at 80.7 in coverage and a 90 in run defense. Kamal Hadden, who also hasn’t seen a snap yet, had similarly high grades in college.

Meanwhile, Javon Bullard, who often slides into the slot, just had one of the better games of his young career against the Commanders, with five solo tackles and a crushing hit on a scrambling Jayden Daniels over 58 snaps.

Obviously, Bo Melton is currently injured and is still learning the position, but he’s got corner speed and seems to be quickly developing the instincts to play the position after spending his career as a wide receiver.

One obvious difference is that so far this season, the pass rush is getting home consistently – the Micah Parsons effect is on full display. His presence is making the defensive front better, which translates to making life easier on the cover guys. If the goal was to get consistent pressure with four, it looks like the Packers are on their way to achieving that goal. And that only bodes well for the overall defense. And it doesn’t hurt that there’s an All-Pro safety named Xavier McKinney patrolling the back end of the D.

Add in the Jeff Hafley effect, which has yellow helmets flying to the ball like buzzards to carrion, and there’s the makings of a complete defense. So far, the Packers' defense is ranked third in the league with 189.5 passing yards allowed per game. Again, a disclaimer: It’s only Week 3. But the Packers’ players and coaches sure seem to believe.

“I thought he played really good on Thursday night,” Haffley said of Nixon this week at his weekly press conference. “And now he needs to do that going forward. He has to do that over and over and over and over again, and that’s the sign of a great corner.”

“At the end of the day, that’s one game,” Nixon told Packers.com. “I want to do it every week. … My confidence is always through the roof.”

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Kevin Gibson is a professional writer and author based in Louisville, Ky. He's also a former sports writer who covered high school, college and professional sports, a Packers shareholder and a fan since 1975. Even John Hadl couldn't break him. Follow him on Twitter: @kgramone

__________________________

 

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (16)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
dblbogey's picture

September 19, 2025 at 02:20 pm

" Remember when the Packers let Jaire Alexander walk during the off-season, setting off a widespread gnashing of teeth across Green Bay fandom?" I recall most fans were in favor of letting Jaire walk, and it was the right move as Jaire's injuries have turned him into a very average player, when he actually plays.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 19, 2025 at 03:42 pm

Even fans who were happy to see Alexander move on were concerned about depth and talent at CB. So far, they look very good for an UDFA and a 7th round pick. We’ll see about Hobbs when he gets more playing time.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 20, 2025 at 08:31 am

I don't think it was unreasonable to be concerned, especially with a shiny new CB (Hobbs) with his own history of missing games with injury. Add to that the fact that the Packers largely ignored the DB position in the draft and there was plenty of unease. There's the gamble, but having two CB in house who have been durable and carried the load in '24 (Nixon and Valentine) helps.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

September 19, 2025 at 03:14 pm

Alexander didn't even play in Week 2 despite being active because the Ravens' coaching staff didn't believe he was in football shape (so they say) after coming off an off-season knee procedure --that was after a poor showing in Week 1 after the dramatic loss. Of course he got the old vote of confidence from Harbaugh, but LOL, he's the Ravens' problem now and not ours.

Nixon has been lights out. Sure the improved pass rush has helped out the secondary, but you still have to be in the position to make the plays and execute. The coaching staff aIso deserves credit for having them positioned correctly in the first place and not several yards away. I figured the CB room might be a little bit of a weak spot for us, but as pointed out, they've been at the top of the charts so far. Keep it up!

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

September 19, 2025 at 04:27 pm

I think the Packers organization looked at the high draft picks we spent on Alexander, Savage, and Stokes, and they looked at guys we could get on Day 3 and through FA, and they made a decision that they weren't going to take DBs early. So we bought McKinney and Hobbs. We got Nixon for nothing. We spent a 7th round pick on Valentine.

Bullard was taken late in the 2nd, and he's done a great job, but we also got Williams in the 4th, who is also doing a great job.

When we passed on Cooper DeJean, I believe that signaled the new strategy in the secondary. We weren't going to spend first round picks on DBs, but we'd bring in proven DBS in FA. Like McKinney, and it really looks, so far, as though it's working. Even last year, when Nixon and Valentine were de facto starters, and Bullard and Williams were rookies, this was an effective pass defense. You'd have to think with a year of experience, and the addition of Hobbs, that we might be a pretty respectable secondary. No rookies, several proven vets, a good pass rush

Not to sound anti-rookie, but they're going to make more mistakes than vets, and mistakes can/do cost games. I think the fact that we're not starting any rookies on defense is a plus. We didn't HAVE to play Belton last week, we could have gone a different route, but the coaches figured that they'd go with Belton. And Golden and Williams have played some snaps, but mostly this is a veteran team on both sides of the ball. This is a good thing, IMO.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

September 20, 2025 at 07:40 am

I dunno LH, every team passed on Cooper Dejean in the first round. Is that the sign of a new strategy or just an evaluation that Cooper was believed to be a second round talent. I agree with your pro-veteran sentiment but I am not at all sure about this new strategy by the Packer FO. I think we will see DBs taken in the first round again and it will happen whenever Gute sees a DB with a first round grade that matches the value of his pick.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 20, 2025 at 08:35 am

We can interpret the 2024 draft in a couple different ways, but I think the Packers expected JA to play more than he did in '24 and they had a second first-round draft pick (Stokes) that they needed to count on to play better. They also had Valentine who showed well as a rookie, and Nixon who helped carry the water when the team was playing well down the stretch in '23.

Going into '24, the resources and depth of the CB room looked way more promising than it turned out to be. At some point, you have to lean into that and put your draft resources elsewhere...thank you for Edgerrin Cooper!

0 points
0
0
RobinsonDavis's picture

September 20, 2025 at 09:27 am

For Gute, the CBs have become what the LB's were for Ted Thompson, in some respects. Gute demonstrates an unwillingness to draft injured CBs, or those coming off injuries with early picks. While you can't deny that the Packers are looking for value, they are ALSO identifying TYPES of CBs that are flexible enough to match opponents schemes. IMPORTANTLY, the Packers are drafting safeties that meet their speed and agility metrics for CBs, which should not be overlooked. When it comes to DB free agents, Gute is more willing to look at the players' tape/accomplishments, vs. metrics - exception Nixon, who was neither IMO, but has made himself into solid NFL corner while with the Packers coaching staff.

Regarding Dejean, let's remember the Packers traded DOWN IMMEDIATELY after the Eagles jumped-up to select him one pick in front of the Packers in the 2nd round. Though we may never know, it seems obvious to me that he was on the Packers radar at this point in the draft. Also, recognize that the Eagles gave up picks #50 & #53 in the second round to move up to #40....the trade value tracks to the equivalent of pick #23 in the Draft Valuation charts - a first round pick.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

September 20, 2025 at 08:46 am

Or, as has been repeated for back as long as Ted was at the helm, they take the best player on their board. Cooper DeJean wasn't that player, neither was he considered a first round selection by any other team. The fact that Bullard was picked in round two sorta undermines your theory, also Bullard fills a hybrid slot/safety position which also further stretches the idea.

If there's a great corner available in the first round and he's on top of their board, they'll pick him. Same as it ever was. They spent how many years not taking wide-outs at 1 and this year they took one. I don't think that suddenly means that wide-outs at 1 are a new philosophy, it's just the way the draft worked.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

September 19, 2025 at 04:51 pm

It looks like coaches Hafley and Covington have tightened up the DL so Nixon can now focus on his job.
He's always had heart.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

September 19, 2025 at 08:42 pm

The hand-wringing about the CBs in the off-season was much ado about nothing. They were plenty good last year, and they are bound to get better.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 20, 2025 at 08:42 am

Better knock on wood. It's all about health.
The top end of the CB room has played well so far, but the depth of the CB room isn't ideal. Having 3 CB who can play and two safeties who can cover is way better than most teams, though.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 20, 2025 at 07:20 am

"One obvious difference is that so far this season, the pass rush is getting home consistently – the Micah Parsons effect is on full display."

Yes...agree Kevin...then you also mentioned Hafley...who has provided a huge ripple effect of performance from both his DBs ...and his coaches since he arrived.

He and Ainsley have put the Team's back end in position to make plays.

Hafley and Covington and Dugan have done the same with the front 7.

The #1 vs the #3 Defenses in the NFL on display in Cleveland. I believe the Packer D will have a better day than the Browns D. Why? A tale of two QBs...40 year old Flacco vs 26 year old Love.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 20, 2025 at 08:51 am

The Packers were able to pressure Goff and Daniels. The test for the secondary will be when the Packers' defensive front runs into an OL that successfully buys a decent QB some time. It will happen. I don't think that's this week.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 20, 2025 at 10:44 am

Parsons seems to have success whether against a rookie or a high performing vet like Penei Sewell.

0 points
0
0
RobinsonDavis's picture

September 20, 2025 at 09:38 am

The CBs are playing great for the system that they are in. Give the Coaches and the Players the credit they deserve! In my opinion, the real test for a CB, is what happens once you leave him on an island covering a decent WR. I don't know if we have that or not. Let's enjoy this D and cheer them all on!

0 points
0
0