Packers' Pass Rush Takes Over Game on Defense

The Green Bay Packers' pass rush hasn't been as consistent in 2020, but against Philadelphia, they continued to take advantage of struggling offensive line play. 

This season the Green Bay Packers' pass rush hasn't been nearly as dominant as it was a season ago. In 2019, led by The Smiths and Kenny Clark, Green Bay was top-5 in pressure rate; however, that hasn't been the case this season. 
 
According to Pro Football Reference, prior to the Packers' Week 13 matchup with Philadelphia, their pressure rate of 18.7 percent ranked 28th and is less than one percent away from being in last place. So what's been the issue?
 
Well, as always, there isn't just one, but the biggest contributor is that the players simply aren't playing at the same level or winning their one-on-one matchups nearly as often. 
 
With that said, while overall the Packers' haven't been generating pressure at the same rate this season, they've still been successful when playing against less-than robust offensive line units. Their four games where they've produced the most quarterback pressures came against Chicago, Atlanta, Jacksonville, and Houston--all of which rank in the bottom third of the NFL in pressures allowed. And that held true once again against the Eagles as they put together their best showing of the season.
 
Philadelphia entered that game having allowed 191 pressures and over four sacks per game, both of which were the most in football. This is in part due to a number of key injuries, poor play, as well as Carson Wentz holding the ball too long; and Green Bay made sure to take full advantage. 
 
When it was all said and done, Green Bay totaled seven sacks, four of which came in the first half, along with 12 quarterback hits, and an incredible 28 total pressures. Their previous season high was 18. This, of course, made it difficult for the Eagles' offense to get going and left Wentz flustered. Even on plays without pressure, his eyes would drop, and he was quick to leave the pocket because of the constant pressure he was under for most of the game. Pressure is what would also force Darnell Savage's game-ending interception as Preston Smith was able to get in Jalen Hurts' throwing lane and tip the pass.
 
As a result of this 28 pressure performance, everybody was able to get in on the action; Preston Smith, Za'Darius Smith, Rashan Gary, Kingsley Keke, Dean Lowry, and Raven Greene all recorded at least half a sack. Also, some credit does need to be given to Mike Pettine, who seemed to play much more aggressively at first glance. We saw more blitzing, press-man coverage, and guys in the box more often than what we have traditionally seen this season. This helped create some of that pressure and left the Eagles' offense averaging a pedestrian 4.7 yards per play.
 
It's also worth pointing out that after the game, Za'Darius Smith mentioned that he, Preston Smith, and Kenny Clark had a conversation with Pettine this week, asking him to simplify the game plan and to let them do what they do best, which is get after the quarterback. Credit to The Smiths and Clark for bringing this up, but also to Pettine for listening.
 
Ultimately, we still need to see more consistency from this group -- especially against better offensive line units -- but they are trending in the right direction. It can be easy to say, "oh, it was just the Eagles," but that's what good teams do against inferior opponents--they dominate. And for this Green Bay Packers team to reach their full potential, they'll need the pass-rush to continue dominating. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Born and raised in Green Bay, WI and I still call it home. After my family, watching the Packers, sharing my opinions on the team through my writing and interacting with other fans is my greatest passion. You can find me on Twitter at @Paul_Bretl. 
 

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (26)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

December 07, 2020 at 01:23 pm

That may be because we are getting back to the approach that Pettine outlined as the core principle golf his D: disrupting the passer.

Unfortunately, SF blew that apart last year by attacking and decimating on the ground, as others have replicated. I believe Pettine made adjustments to try and shore up the run and that those changes significantly hindered that core principle: disruption.

So it doesn’t surprise me that we can pressure the QB. However, until we are able to do that against a good running team that is committed to the run, I’m not sold on anything.

I’ve yet to see us show signs that we can pressure the QB and take the run out of the equation through defense as opposed to offensive points. Show that, and there is a basis for excitement that.

Let’s see how we do that against Henry and the Titans before we see this as real progress rather than just taking advantage against immobile, poor or rookie QBs with dubious O lines. There won’t be too many like that in the playoffs.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

December 07, 2020 at 02:59 pm

"I’ve yet to see us show signs that we can pressure the QB and take the run out of the equation"

That's hard. What I would be happy to see is that they are versitile enough to do either. So if they fall behind against a good running team they can slow them down enough to let the offense catch up.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 07, 2020 at 08:09 pm

Need stud ILBs to run a flexD. Does this guy know how to swap the front end looks from series to series. He seems predictable.

0 points
0
0
13TimeChamps's picture

December 07, 2020 at 05:15 pm

Not necessarily defending Pettine but.......currently the top 4 running backs in the league are:

Derrick Henry (1317)
Dalvin Cook (1250)
James Robinson (968)
Ronald Jones II (820)

That's a brutal Murderers Row of RBs for one team to face. It's not like other teams are stopping these guys either.

0 points
0
0
Bure9620's picture

December 08, 2020 at 04:41 am

That is true also Indys multi headed backfield and Miles Sanders.....our run defense isn't great yet we have
definitely faced some good rushing teams

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

December 07, 2020 at 12:40 pm

Pettine did the right thing--might as well take what the offense gives you. The Eagles are in a class by themselves as far as sacks allowed (53). By comparison, the Packers have allowed only 14, which is tied for second-fewest.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

December 07, 2020 at 01:22 pm

Inconsistent Packer rush needs to send a big shout-out to the Philly O-line for being injured and generally shitty. Our D-line did what is expected against a lesser opponent and for that I am thankful. Like Coldworld said, let's hold off with the ring measurements until we at least play the Titans.

0 points
0
0
Since91's picture

December 07, 2020 at 08:15 pm

You mean the same Titans that gave up 40 points to the Browns in one half?

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 08, 2020 at 05:29 am

The blueprint is Pass on the Titans, score points and make Tannehill beat you. The second half lapses by the Pack have to be eliminated on this December run.

0 points
0
0
Packer_Fan's picture

December 07, 2020 at 02:19 pm

Except for the 4th and 18 TD, the defense played well. They had to adjust to Hurst running ability, and they did that on the last drive.

I agree with the comment about making the defense simpler. One writer said they left Alexander on an island and they should. Makes the defense better.

It almost appears Pettine keeps on making adjustments to the point where aggressive play and not letting players play occurs. Just results in mistakes.

The best defense is a simple defense. They have good players, let em play

0 points
0
0
PatrickGB's picture

December 07, 2020 at 05:07 pm

And it’s been reported that Z and others had lobbied Pet for a simpler defense.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

December 07, 2020 at 02:43 pm

Pretty sad that Mike Daniels took to Twitter today to say he's shocked Keke doesn't play more , I guess everyone except Mike Pettine doesn't feel this way , and now word is out the Smiths and Clark had a private meeting with Pettine to ask to make changes and they then have a 7 sack game.

0 points
0
0
flackcatcher's picture

December 07, 2020 at 05:07 pm

Z Smith in HIS after game presser recounted the story to game reporters. Yeah, word is out..../////

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

December 07, 2020 at 07:54 pm

My response stating the word is out about the Smiths talk with Pettine about the Defense was referring to the fact that Pettine has been exposed in the sports media, so sorry if that was over your head .

0 points
0
0
HighPlainsDrifter's picture

December 08, 2020 at 04:57 am

Mike Daniels needs to keep his opinions about the Packers to himself.

Players suggest strategy to coaches quite often. Communication is a sign of a healthy coach/player relationship. There was nothing cloak and dagger about the conversation with Pettine, nor was there some type of clandestine aspect to it.

0 points
0
0
CoachDino's picture

December 07, 2020 at 06:06 pm

So frustrating...
Does anyone do, or are capable of critical thinking anymore? Seriously... What a useless article if the point is the packers are 28th in pressure. Think people, why? because Z, preston and clarke suck. 28th means suck. Because Keke and Gary haven't developed? What a disservice.

The biggest reason is because when you play prevent defense more than any other team in the league you are going to sacrifice your "pressure" ranking. Hello.

then to make a point that they make the most hay when playing teams that are susceptible to it is once again either dissiving or lazy. The inference being what, that other teams play better against better competition than they do against worse? ALL teams pad stats against weaker opponents, is it not obvious. When you look at stats that do not take into account smoothing, variance from the mean or critical factor adjustments they are incapable of being a stand alone analysis. It's why the all the political polls have been so wrong, lazy methodology. I no longer wonder why people on posts make so many knee jerk, emotional, ultra critical statements, they rely on poor information.

Oh it must be a Pettine problem? What problem? that they win? They are 22-6 in the regular season over the last 2 years. All I heard last year was how bad Arod and our Rec were. Those writers and posters were exposed. The results say the same for the Pettine / defense haters. Who are you going to replace Pettine with? Never hear mention of that. Just lazy statements that lack any substance. get rid of him, with who? Crickets. Sign a Big time WR ok and get rid of who Crickets.

Who is the issue? Gute for the terrible Drafts? FA Signings or lack thereof? pettine for the terrible coaching with the terrible players Gute gets him. Or ML for not getting Pettine to adjust his defense? Or is it because they paid Arod all that money and can't sign anyone else? At least those sheep have been silenced for now but since the clueless masses that need to complain to show how much they know are now on the Pettine and Gute and just Kinda WR when it suits them.

I could go on and on as the next mindless blunder is all the SBs they should have when in fact it has nothing to do with then GM's but everything to do with guys like Favre (who was a godsend) throwing ridiculously imprudent/untimely interceptions. Or Arod laying an egg against the Giants. Or Bostics mental lapse or 4th and 26.How quickly we forget the real reasons let alone how impossible it really is to wina SB.

I add JK Scott to the list now. I get one article where his kicks haven't been very long, then he boots a 60 yarder thats returned for a TD and he is the worst. he's currently graded 6th overall. He excels at hangtime producing the least returns. That is their game. If you want to knock it at least know about it.

I know this is a bit of a rant but my heavens the Packers due nothing but win and I still see 80% of writers and posters complaining about issues with no idea of what is behind them as in root cause analysis.

Its not this guy or Cheeseheadtv but everywhere. Sorry but I will at least make my points to insist on accountability for content.

How many SBs did the best defense to ever take the field win (85 bears).

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

December 07, 2020 at 07:57 pm

JK Scott is ranked overall 25 out of 32 , he was at 28 two games ago .

0 points
0
0
CoachDino's picture

December 08, 2020 at 12:17 am

1Jack Fox
2Bradley Pinion
3Tommy Townsend
4A.J. Cole III
5Mitch Wishnowsky
6J.K. Scott

PFF as of the time of my post.

0 points
0
0
CoachDino's picture

December 08, 2020 at 05:30 pm

He's ranked 25th on Average. that is not a performance ranking. Ranking Punters on average is fools gold.
Todays game is about
eliminating return opportunities (see what happens when he boons one and its returned)
Pinning teams down with Fair catches and out of bounds punts inside the 20 and 10.
Hang-time
release Time

You are comparing apples to oranges. playing Checkers vs Chess.

Avg yards is a stat, PFF Grade is a weighted composited of critical factors (one being distance Id assume).

Nothing personal but I wish the media would help fans get with the times, judging kickers by Avg distance is archaic Average measurements have shown statistically to be a poor measurement. Deviation from the mean and optimal vs result.

0 points
0
0
Bure9620's picture

December 07, 2020 at 08:31 pm

Those huge mistakes are why Packers fans are who they are......you forgot Larry Fitzgerald's catch and run in overtime after the insane throws by Rodgers to tie the game......The Patriots never had blunders like this which is why they won 6 SBs in a relatively short span....Your deficiencies are exacerbated in the playoffs and unless Special Teams improves or atleast the mistakes are corrected, these issues will rear their ugly head and other teams will exploit them. A punt return TD can cost you a game in the post-season even if Offense and defense play well.......Need I remind anyone of the consistent botched ST plays against Seattle in 2014......I am still unable to re-watch that game as I am afraid I will become catatonic in doing so....Special Teams are SOO important

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 08, 2020 at 05:35 am

Packertown never seems to define and secure dedicated role players for sp teams. Belichick had pro bowlers. Where are the gunners on this squad? LB depth is lacking.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

December 08, 2020 at 07:21 am

Wow, that was like listening to Rudy explain why he had his hand down his pants in the Borat movie.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 08, 2020 at 08:17 am

Coach, did you get up on the wrong side of the bed.....lol

I share your frustrations. Many fans seek perfection and don’t see the big picture, thus find something wrong with what the team or player did on said play or game. And the worse “arm chair QB’s” that stat oh, they should’ve ran the ball or threw the ball, even thou analytics and game flow support the play call by the Coach. Of course, that only comes out when the play doesn’t work. IE: I didn’t hear anyone tout about MLF called a successful 4th and 1/goal with a TD pass. If that pass would’ve failed MLF would’ve been toasted. Yes, a run has a higher success rate, but just maybe MLF and Rodgers saw a weakness they could exploit

I also notice certain posters come out after a loss so they can tout their intelligence of “I told you so”. It’s so easy to be critical. After a win, crickets.

0 points
0
0
CoachDino's picture

December 08, 2020 at 05:46 pm

Mur - How could you tell, I was frustrated by other things and took a break to read some GBP news and man, I went off. LOL... I'm still in mode. funny thing is I know it changes no one's mind but dang if it doesn't make me feel better.

PS Being a Coach on a mostly Non-Professional level for so many years you realize the #1 issue is Parents. That's what I see here. A bunch of parents that blame everyone else due to their unrealistic expectation and evaluations.

0 points
0
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

December 08, 2020 at 11:04 am

A lot here but there is much that is accurate! Other that may be debatable!

Thanks for your perspective!

0 points
0
0