Packers Snap Counts Vs. Chicago: Week 16, 2025
The Packers beat themselves again in a loss to the Bears.

The Packers activated Edge Brenton Cox to the 53-man roster and placed Micah Parsons on injured reserve. The Packers did not elevate anyone from the practice squad. TE Josh Whyle, RT Zach Tom, and Safety Evan Williams were inactive due to injury. DTs Quinton Bohanna and Nazir Stackhouse were healthy scratches.
With Zach Tom out, Jordan Morgan rather than Darian Kinnard got the start at right tackle. Javon Bullard got the start at safety in place of Evan Williams. Donovan Jennings was active but did not play.
OFFENSIVE LINEMEN:
| Player | Snaps | % | STs |
| Belton | 72 | 100 | 4/18% |
| Rhyan | 72 | 100 | 4/18% |
| Walker | 72 | 100 | 4/18% |
| Banks | 72 | 100 | 4/18% |
| Morgan | 72 | 100 | 4/18% |
| Kinnard | 11 | 15 | 4/18% |
| Monk | 4/18% |
The run blocking was above average. It started out a little rough. One the first drive, the Packers rushed for 2, (roughing the passer to get the first down), 1, 1, 2, to turn the ball over on downs. That is 4 carries for 6 yards. However, the offensive line warmed up after that. The Packers added 19 more carries for 89 yards in the first half (4.68 yards/carry) to finish with 95 yards on 23 carries in the first half. The Packers added 97 yards on 21 carries (4.62 yards/carry) in the second half. The Packers gained 192 yards altogether on a whopping 44 carries (4.36 per carry) and still managed to lose the game. Pro Football Focus had the Packers in the 69th percentile of rushing EPA with a -0.03 per rush. The Packers do have some problems on third and short and on goal line plays.
The pass blocking was good enough. The Packers allowed 10 pressures, including 2 sacks plus another sack that was negated by a roughing penalty. The Packers only attempted 24 passes Jordan Morgan allowed 1 sack, which ended the Packers' chances to win in regulation. Per PFF, Banks and Belton each allowed 2 hurries, while Rasheed Walker, Sean Rhyan, and Darian Kinnard did not allow any pressures.
RUNNING BACKS:
| Player | Snaps | % | STs | Routes | Targets |
| Wilson | 33 | 46 | 11 | 0 | |
| Jacobs | 28 | 39 | 14/54% | 9 | 2 |
| Brooks | 15 | 21 | 11/50% | 11 | 0 |
Josh Jacobs gained 36 yards on 12 carries with a long of 7. He caught both of his targets for 12 yards. Jacobs fumbled at the Chicago 4-yard line to take points off the board. It is not clear whether Jacobs' knee flared up but he did not play much, maybe not at all, after his fumble.
Emanuel Wilson gained 82 yards on 14 attempts, 5.86-yard average. He had a long of 14. On second and goal at the Chicago 5 yard line, Wilson dropped a pass which turned out to be a backwards pass, so it went down in the records as a fumble. It went out of bounds at the 8-yard line. The Packers failed to score on third down and settled for a field goal. Wilson again showed good acceleration. Brooks gained 4 yards on 1 carry and he had an assisted tackle on special teams. None of the running backs allowed a pressure while pass blocking.
QUARTERBACKS:
| Player | Snaps | % | STs |
| Willis | 46 | 64 | |
| Love | 26 | 36 |
Jordan Love completed 8 of 13 (612.5%) passes for 77 yards (5.92 yards per attempt). He had a 78.0 pass rating. He also scrambled twice for 7 yards. He was knocked out of the game after a helmet-to-helmet hit gave him a concussion. Malik Willis played admirably in place of Love. Willis completed 9 of 11 passes (81.81%) for 121 yards (11 yards per attempt) including a gorgeous 33-yard touchdown pass to Romeo Doubs. Willis was sacked twice for 6 yards and finished with a passer rating of 142.8. He also gained 44 yards on 10 carries. It looked to me like Coach LaFleur kept the training wheels on Willis a bit. Most of his throws were outside the numbers. I admit that the few throws over the middle were not without a bit of suspense. The Packers failed to score a touchdown on any of their 5 trips into the red zone, and twice came away with no points at all due to a fumble and turning it over on downs.
After the game Willis said he tried to speed up the play and changed his cadence, which led to losing the handle on the snap. Willis was supposed to fake an end around to Melton but instead Wilson picked up the ball off the ground but could not gain the first down.
TIGHT ENDS:
| Player | Snaps | % | STs | Routes | Targets |
| Musgrave | 55 | 76 | 1/5% | 27 | 3 |
| Fitzpatrick | 26 | 36 | 2/9% | 2 | 1 |
Musgrave caught all 3 of his targets for 38 yards with a long of 26. Last week he had 52 receiving yards. Though he once again stumbled or fell almost immediately when he tried to turn up-field after catching each pass , Musgrave continues to show that he can be a useful member of the team. Fitzpatrick had no receptions. He sustained a non-contact injury and did not return. It was reported to be an injury to his achilles tendon. Whyle was still out with a concussion. The Packers elected not to elevate one of the two tight ends on the practice squad for this game. Expect the Packers to be scouring practice squads and looking at street free agents if Fitzpatrick's injury is indeed serious.
WIDE RECEIVERS:
| Player | Snaps | % | STs | Routes | Targets |
| Reed | 46 | 64 | 1/5% | 27 | 3 |
| Watson | 45 | 62 | 1/5% | 22 | 6 |
| Doubs | 45 | 62 | 4/18% | 20 | 6 |
| Wicks | 30 | 42 | 12 | 2 | |
| Golden | 22 | 31 | 9 | 0 | |
| Williams | 3 | 4 | 5/23% | 0 | 0 |
| Melton | 1 | 1 | 9/41% | 0 | 0 |
Doubs caught 5 of his 6 targets for 84 yards, including a 33-yard touchdown when he cleanly beat safety Chauncey Gardner-Johnson at the line of scrimmage. Doubs injured his wrist while attempting to field the on-side kickoff and did not play in the overtime period. Reed caught all 3 of his targets for 35 yards with a long of 31. He added a 6-yard run. Watson caught 2 of his 6 targets for 17 yards. Wicks caught 2 passes for 12 yards. Matthew Golden had a target but no receptions. Melton and Savion Williams did not even run any routes.
DEFENSIVE TACKLES:
| Player | Snaps | % | STs |
| Brooks | 49 | 77 | 11/50% |
| Wooden | 29 | 45 | 7/32% |
| Riley | 23 | 36 | 4/18% |
| Brinson | 21 | 33 | 4/18% |
Brooks had no statistics (other than an assisted tackle on special teams). PFF listed Brooks with 1 hurry. Wooden had 2 tackles (1 solo). PFF listed Wooden with 2 stops and he also had a missed tackle. Jordan Riley had 2 solo tackles, both of which were stops. Brinson had a solo tackle, a QB hit, and another QB hit that was negated by his own penalty for a face mask violation. Brooks seemed a little overwhelmed at times as a run defender. PFF credited both Brinson and Wooden with 2 hurries.
The Bears gained 150 yards on 26 carries for a 5.77-yard average. Their running backs gained 108 yards on 22 carries, a 4.91-yard average. The Bears' offensive line got a good push and opened holes. That said, Chicago was 1 of 4 on third downs on the first half and 1 of 7 in the second half, though they converted 2 of 3 fourth down opportunities in the second half. 1 of 11 third downs is good defense, and even 3 of 14 is a good percentage. Still, despite an good defensive effort, the Packers found ways to lose.
DEFENSIVE ENDS:
| Player | Snaps | % | STs |
| Enagbare | 43 | 67 | 4/18% |
| Gary | 37 | 58 | |
| Van Ness | 26 | 41 | |
| Cox | 18 | 28 | 6/27% |
| Sorrell | 10 | 16 | 5/23% |
| Mosby | 16/73% |
Enagbare had 3 assisted tackles. PFF lists him with 1 hurry in 25 pass rushing snaps, a tiny 4% pressure rate. Gary had no tackles and 2 QB hits. PFF listed him with 5 hurries on 26 chances, a 26.2% pressure rate. Van Ness had no conventional statistics. PFF credited him with 3 hurries on 14 pass rush attempts, a fine 21.4% pressure rate. Cox had 3 tackles (1 solo). PFF listed him with 1 hurry in 9 pass rushing snaps, an 11.1% rate. Sorrell had no stats and PFF listed him with no pressures in 4 chances. Mosby had 2 tackles on special teams (1 solo).
LINEBACKERS:
| Players | Snaps | % | STs |
| Cooper | 64 | 100 | 9/41%% |
| Walker | 64 | 100 | 4/18% |
| McDuffie | 26 | 41 | 17/77% |
| Hopper | 13/59% | ||
| Welch | 2/9% |
Walker had 14tackles (5 solo) including a tackle for loss and he had a pass defensed. He had 2 stops per PFF. Walker had 2 hurries on 11 pass rushed, an 18.2% pass rush rate. He allowed 5 of 6 his targets to be completed for 58 yards, a 106.9 passer rating. Cooper had 3 tackles (2 solo). He had no stops and 1 hurry on 6 pass rushes, a 16.7% pressure rate. He allowed 2 of his 2 targets to be completed for 37 yards, a 118.8 passer rating. McDuffie had 5 assisted tackles. PFF listed him with a missed tackle. He allowed 1 target to be completed for 10 yards. McDuffie had an assisted tackle on special teams.
DEFENSIVE BACKS:
| Player | Snaps | % | STs |
| McKinney | 64 | 100 | 11/42% |
| Valentine | 64 | 100 | |
| Nixon | 64 | 100 | 4/15% |
| Bullard | 64 | 100 | 7/27% |
| Hobbs | 38 | 59 | |
| Anderson | 14/64% | ||
| Olapado | 13/59% | ||
| Hadden | 12/55% |
Bullard had 9 tackles (4 solo) and a pass defensed. He also had a tackle on special teams. He allowed 3 of 5 passes to be completed for 15 yards, a 64.6 passer rating. I thought Bullard was very active and had a very nice day. Mckinney had 6 tackles (3 solo) and he had a pass defensed. He had a good chance for an interception but could not haul it in. PFF did not provide a coverage breakdown for him. Hobbs had 6 tackles (3 solo) and a tackle for loss/stop. He had 2 hurries on 2 pass rushing chances, a 100% pressure rate. He allowed 3 of 4 targets to be completed for 37 yards and a 103 passer rating. Valentine had 2 tackles (1 solo). He also had a hurry on his only pass rushing snap. He allowed 3 of 5 targfets to be completed for 41 yards, good for an 83.3 passer rating. Nixon had 1 assisted tackle. He allowed 2 of 4 targets to be completed for 52 yards and a 135.2 passer rating. Nixon did not seem to have a great day. He did have tight coverage on one touchdown reception - just a great route and pass.
SPECIAL TEAMS:
Whelan never had to punt even though the Packers had 9 possessions. McManus made all of his extra points and all of his field goals. Double-clutch Doubs could not secure the onside kick to ice the game. Matthew Golden, the guy with great hands, was riding the bench instead of being on the hands team.
The Packers committed just 4 penalties for 40 yards. It seemed worse than that. The Bears committed 10 penalties for 105 yards, some of which kept drives alive. There were a couple of miscommunications on defense that led to touchdowns. The Packers tend to be sloppy. They outplayed the Bear but lost.
All statistics nflgsis or pro football focus.
Photo courtesy of Dan Powers, USA Today Network.
OL: 5.15
RB: 1.06
TE: 1.15 (down a bit due to the injury to Fitzpatrick)
WR: 2.67
DT: 1.91
DE: 2.09
LB: 2.41
DB: 4.59
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________




Comments (28)
Thegreatreynoldo
December 21, 2025 at 04:50 am
This is a team that finds it hard to win if it does not play a clean game. Someone said that the Bears had a 0.5% chance of winning the game at one point. Nothing like beating the odds. I guess no one told the Bears what the odds were.
It looks like Jordan Morgan can play right tackle. Maybe he can be the starter at LT next year. It also looks like Belton can play guard. And Rhyan can play center. Run blocking at the edges was iffy at the beginning of the game.
It looks like Riley leapfrogged Brinson and Stackhouse, as least as a clogger. Brinson has at least some pass rush juice. I did not think much of the defensive personnel back in July but Hafley gets more out of the unit. The secondary is pretty strong. The front 7 is where I think he is getting more out of those players than expected.
jlc1
December 21, 2025 at 06:58 am
This is also a team that let's other teams play clean games. McKinney missed a throw on his hands. 4 dropped int chances last week. Where are the TOs?
SinceLombardi
December 21, 2025 at 06:39 am
What is the definition of insanity again? Doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different result?
This roster is loaded with wildcard round players. Wildcard coaches and a wildcard GM.
They aren’t winning anything next year either. Does anyone remember the Schottenheimer Chiefs? Marty was a really good coach that always got your 10 wins. But something always went wrong.
murf7777
December 21, 2025 at 10:12 am
That’s a really interesting comparison between Mlf and Shottenheimer. Let’s look at Shottnheimer’s record with Cleveland as a young innovative HC. . His 5 years were 5 X in playoffs, 4 X won division and 3X lost in the conference game. Since he left after that year which was 1988 Cleveland has made the playoffs 4 times. That 36 years. I’d guess that in hindsight, if Cleveland could go back in time they would give a king’s ransom to have kept Shottenheimer as there HC.
As Harry said, Firing doesn’t mean better!
I’d say be careful what you ask for, for another Example, just look at our Badger Football team.
dobber
December 21, 2025 at 10:26 am
"As Harry said, Firing doesn’t mean better!"
When you're living near the top of the league, it's a lot easier to move down than up. If you're going to make a change, you'd better be darn sure you've exhausted the opportunities in hand.
"I’d say be careful what you ask for, for another Example, just look at our Badger Football team."
I thought Fick was a great get when they brought him in, but it's looking like he wasn't prepared for both the rapid shifting in the landscape of college player recruitment and for the issues he would inherit in his own locker room. He made poor decisions in terms of offensive schemes and assistants, and failed to stock the offensive line. He's tied himself to a contract the Badgers can't financially swallow (good for him, but not the program), which means that if he doesn't turn things around in 2026 to the tune of 8+ wins (and--let's face it--his roster is in tatters despite decent play from his defense down the stretch), he's on his way out after 2026 and Mac probably goes with him.
PackEyedOptimist
December 21, 2025 at 07:10 am
A Seahawks-like epic loss.
BUT
You have to consider just how GREAT this team played given the full circumstances:
1. Playoff-like away game against a dirty-cheap-shot opponent
2. Incredible Injuries:
NFL Offensive MVP-candidate QB is lost early on a second dirty hit
ALL-Pro TE candidate is out
Pro-Bowl C/G is out
Pro-Bowl ROT is out
All-Pro/Pro Bowl RB is playing badly injured, and leaves early
Back-up QB is cheap-shotted
NFL Defensive MVP-candidate DE out
Pro-Bowl candidate FS is out
Starting, best DT is out
Despite all of that, the team played their hearts out and "should" have won.
I have ZERO complaints about the coaching in this game (though the Red-Zone failures issue is mind-boggling at this point)
I just hope our QBs recover, and we meet the Bears in the playoffs...
Ferrari-Driver
December 21, 2025 at 08:49 am
Packeyed, I like that post and you are an optimist. It makes me think of that old movie line "we was robbed".
SicSemperTyrannis
December 21, 2025 at 09:25 am
I agree with all that except I fault our HC for not adjusting from last game better. At least they used a cage rush.
SinceLombardi
December 21, 2025 at 09:31 am
I’m looking at it in the totality of the MLF era. This happens too often. It’s not the players that are missing that hurt us. It’s the ones that played. Nixon is a penalty magnet clown. Valentine is not a starter.
The corners have been an issue for three seasons. Even Rasul Douglass is better than anything we have.
The next two games will decide if MLF/BG get extensions. I wouldn’t hold my breath.
PackEyedOptimist
December 21, 2025 at 11:17 am
Caleb Williams threw a bunch of passes away—because our coverage was good.
All CBs get beaten. ALL.
WD
December 21, 2025 at 09:58 am
I agree there is no need for pessimism about the Green Bay Packers!
No Parsons? No Jordan Love? I would say no chance at winning! Sure, the loss was devastating. But, had we handled the onside kick we would all be talking about a great victory against all odds! And, a game ball to our backup QB! There is no doubt in my mind that when and if we are completely healthy we would be hands down the best team in the league!
PS It ain't over till it's over.
Since'75
December 21, 2025 at 06:26 pm
"No Parsons? No Jordan Love? I would say no chance at winning!"
Funny thing happened, without Parsons, Love out of the game, we had a great chance of winning.
harleycops
December 21, 2025 at 07:26 am
Nixon's salary cap hit is $6.8m, Doubs is $3.5m, Brinson is $900k. Cut all three of these moron, bonehead players and we recoop $11m toward the cap. For what they did tonight, they ought to be giving back a couple of million to the Packers. Their play was absurb, unacceptable, and totally ridiculous for losing this pathetic game to Da-Bears. Nixon can't cover, Doub can't catch, and Brinson can't tackle w/o a facemask. Hope these 3 had to take an Uber back to G.B. and not fly on the team plane.
Doubs had 1 job on special teams: cover the damn ball and the game is over. Remember back to Jan 18, 2015? Bostick botched an onside kick from Seahawks instead of Jordy Nelson catching it and blew our NFC Championship chances. This is dejavu all over again. These idiots just blew our NFC Championship chances 10 years later. The onside kick curse is alive and well!!!
jvole
December 21, 2025 at 07:33 am
Things I learned, that take my mind off this loss---Malik is going to get paid next year. So is Hafley. Hopefully our next DC is similarly talented.
Doubs should probably get taken off of special teams. He is afraid of getting hit and is thinking too much. Only a matter of time before that becomes an issue in punt returns. Probably fearful because of his concussions. I would be.
The Packers are a deep and the better team. They fought like hell. Just a weird game.
Apparently the refs ARE able to call holding. Just 1x per game.
stockholder
December 21, 2025 at 07:58 am
Any questions about the depth have been answered.
The OL can take a beating and keep on ticking.
Why change it?
Re-sign Willis and Quay Walker.
Bullard, Williams, and Cooper are the future of
this Defense.
jvole
December 21, 2025 at 08:23 am
I have been critical of Walker in the past but he has been getting better every year. I think having Barry as a coach for two years did him no good but he has really come on. Still does not have the greatest instincts but he is so freaking fast. So I agree with signing him. He will never be a pro-bowler but above average.
There is zero chance that they can afford Willis. My bet is that he goes to the Saints. For his sake, I hope it is not the Jets or Raiders.
SicSemperTyrannis
December 21, 2025 at 09:29 am
For all we know GB keeps both Hafley and Willis.
jvole
December 21, 2025 at 10:09 am
We will see what the cap gurus say, and who gets cut, but the average non-rookie QB averages $20-30 million. That's not nothing. Besides, he might want to start somewhere.
dobber
December 21, 2025 at 11:31 am
I agree that Willis is going to want a chance to play, but no one is going to give Willis even low-end starter's money up front.
Since'75
December 21, 2025 at 06:32 pm
They could give him a 3 or 4 year deal, with 15 million guaranteed, and a team friendly contract with an out his second season if he doesn't pan out
jvole
December 22, 2025 at 08:12 am
This would make the most sense. Build in performance metrics that could get him to $20 million or more and then either drop him or renegotiate after year 1. I just don't see the packers paying $15 mil for a backup quarterback. Better to use that money for an above average cornerback.
jannesbjornson
December 22, 2025 at 11:56 am
To win in this League, you need highly mobile QBs. He will be considered for a promotion by some franchise.
The Pack should give him a fair deal to stick around. He plays to Win.
PeteK
December 21, 2025 at 10:19 am
It's one thing playing backup on a good team and starting for a weak team.
Canam73
December 21, 2025 at 10:30 am
I don't think they can afford to keep Willis either. If they have any free agency money I think they need to look at re-signing starters.
But that said, I will always be a Willis fan. I don't like seeing Love hurt, but it's always fun seeing Willis come in to the game.
tobinrote
December 21, 2025 at 07:58 am
why do i keep getting that feeling that our best qb is riding the bench? He will be starting somewhere next year. this team finds incredible ways to ruin our sense of well-being. this is probably the third giveaway game in which we just simply blew it. but again the red zone playcalling leaves one screaming at the tv and cursing MLF: 4th and a half yard and you do not even have Jacobs on the filed and instead line up in shotgun, not even a pretense of having to defend a run.
Coldworld
December 21, 2025 at 08:10 am
LaFleur and co had a chance to show their true colors. They did. This team showed it still has talent. It also showed it’s as mentally fragile as any team I can recall in any sport. This melt down was spectacular but it wasn’t isolated, even this year. This team will never go anywhere worthwhile without a drastic culture change. We will continue wasting talent as long as LaFleur is here.
The answer came faster and more dramatically than expected. In fact it was the second week in a row, but without the smokescreen of injury shock. Theres really nothing left to be exposed as far as I’m concerned: we have shown what we are. Whether this team squeaks into the playoffs or not, it’s not mentally positioned to win or deliver on its potential. Another year of underperforming the roster potential. LaFleur has to go.
MooPack
December 21, 2025 at 10:24 am
Agreed. This is a cultural problem. It is not isolated. 7 years of a MLF run team. But, muh record?? I now think the Packers record under his tenure was despite him. The team's player talent carried his lack of decision making on almost all levels (coaching staff hires with minimal accountability, player personnel choices, discipline, in game adjustments, clock management, blocking schemes, stubbornness of not more talented rookie player use, situational play calling. Green Bay should have at least one if not two more SB's under Rodgers even if he eventually became part of the problem later. Of course I can already hear some asking who are you going to replace him with. Seriously? As if the entire NFL and NCAA coaching ranks is completely devoid of talented coaches that can run an NFL team. Who here knew who Matt LeFleur was when hired? Didn't think so.
[edit] Keep Hafley at all costs. He turned that D around.
GregC
December 22, 2025 at 10:52 am
Matthew Golden has great hands, but his decision making as a punt returner was shaky. I would have much preferred Doubs to Golden for fielding an onside kick. Unfortunately, Doubs blew it. He took his eye off the ball.