Packers Snap Counts: Week 11 Vs. The Bears
The Bears manage to dictate the style of play but still lose.

The Packers placed Jordan Morgan on the injured reserve list and traded Preston Smith to Pittsburgh. Presumably that means that Jacob Monk would be first up if there were any injuries to interior offensive linemen, and either Kadeem Telfort or Andre Dilliard if any tackles missed time. They signed CB Robert Rochell to the 53-man roster, leaving one open roster spot. That probably was meant for RB Marshawn Lloyd but after being activated from IR for his 21-day window, he came down with appendicitis. The Packers did not elevate anyone from the practice squad.
Colby Wooden was inactive due to injury. Since both Jaire Alexander and Evan Williams were activated after being limited in practice all week, the Packers listed CB Rochell as an inactive player. The other healthy scratches were Travis Glover and Kitan Olapado. QB Malik Willis did not play.
OFFENSIVE LINEMEN
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Walker | 46 | 100 | 2/11% |
| Rhyan | 46 | 100 | 2/11% |
| Tom | 46 | 100 | 2/11% |
| Myers | 46 | 100 | |
| Jenkins | 46 | 100 | |
| Monk | 2/11% | ||
| Telfort | 2/11% | ||
| Dillard | 2/11% |
The offensive line was adequate with their run blocking. The Packers gained 106 yards on 25 carries, good for a 4.24-yard average, which is about league average. The Packers gained 1, 10, 8, 6, and 13 yards on 5 carries during their first offensive possession, or 5 carries for 38 yards. They gained just 11 yards on 9 carries for their remaining carries in the first half. The Packers made corrections in the second half. Their running backs gained 38 yards on 8 carries (4.75-yards average) and Love gained 19 more yards on 3 carries. The line allowed only 2 quarterback hits and 1 sack. Love had enough time. The Packers had long possessions - the absence of mistakes and silly penalties helped make those long drives possible.
Zach Tom, Rasheed Walker, and Sean Rhyan are under contract for 2025 and become free agents in 2026. Josh Myers will be an unrestricted free agent in 2025, so the Packers have some decisions. Zach Tom has made the decision in his case easy: the Packers should extend him some time after this season, so the only issue is agreeing on the numbers. Walker, Mers and Rhyan are starters a team can get by with, although it is a bit undesirable to have three such players starting together. I imagine the Packers will wait to see if Walker and/or Rhyan are going to take another step or not. I would dislike seeing the Packers write big checks to Walker and Rhyan (and Myers, for that matter) in March only to turn around and use high draft picks in April to try to replace them. Myers is another starter who a team can get by with. Since Myers only plays center, he has no value as a utility lineman. Assuming that the 2025 salary cap limit will be $280M to $285M, is a 3-year, $21M deal for Myers too much?
QUARTERBACKS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Love | 46 | 100 | |
| Willis | DNP |
Love completed 13 of his 17 (76.47%) pass attempts for 261 yards (15.35 yards per attempt), 1 TD, 1 Interception, and a 113 passer rating. Love was accurate with his passes other than the interception, which he just plumb overthrew. His decision making was good, other than the 48-yard bomb to Watson. I suppose reasonable people can disagree with that, but I have been consistent on these types of play. I think a player like Xavier McKinney intercepts that pass. The defensive backs, Kyler Gordon and Elijah Hicks, simply did not get the heads turned around. Love added 18 yards on 4 scrambles.
It seems to me as though passes are not coming out within the rhythm of the play; that is, one the first reed and when Loves back foot hits the ground on his backpedal.
RUNNING BACKS:
| Players | Snaps | % | STs |
| Jacobs | 37 | 80 | |
| Brooks | 10 | 22 | 9/50% |
| Wilson | 3 | 7 |
Jacobs gained 76 yards on 18 carries, a 4.22-yard average and a touchdown. He caught 4 of 5 targets for 58 yards with a long of 23. When the Packers need a play, they tend to rely on Jacobs. Brooks had no carries but caught both of his targets for 13 yards. After I wrote 2 weeks ago that Brooks was the best blocking RB on the team, he blew a block against the Bears. Emanuel Wilson got just 3 snaps. He gained 17 yards on 2 carries. Wilson had a carry with 8:40 seconds left in the third quarter. Did Wilson get hurt? Because the Packers ran just 46 plays, Jacobs was able to handle the vast majority of the running back snaps.
TIGHT ENDS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Kraft | 43 | 93 | 3/17% |
| Sims | 17 | 37 | 5/28% |
| Fitzpatrick | 3 | 7 | 5/28% |
Kraft had just one target, which was way over his head and got intercepted. Sims had no targets. The tight ends have been quiet recently.
WIDE RECEIVERS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Doubs | 36 | 78 | |
| Watson | 31 | 67 | |
| Reed | 26 | 57 | 2/11% |
| Wicks | 16 | 35 | |
| Melton | 5 | 11 | 4/22% |
| Heath | 3 | 7 | 5/28% |
Watson caught all 4 of his targets for a whopping 150 yards. He made some tough catches and added lots of yards after the catch. Reed caught 2 of 2 targets for 23 yards, including a 15-yard touchdown strike from Love on a free play (12 men on the field). He also had 1 carry for minus 5 yards. Doubs caught one pass for 17 yards and dropped his other target which would have been good for a first down. Wicks had no receptions and just 1 target.
DEFENSIVE LINEMEN:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Clark | 48 | 67 | |
| Wyatt | 35 | 49 | 4/22% |
| Slaton | 34 | 47 | 6/33% |
| Brooks | 29 | 40 | 6/33% |
| Gary | 46 | 64 | |
| Enagbare | 41 | 57 | 7/39% |
| Van Ness | 24 | 35 | 14/78% |
| Cox | 22 | 31 | 2/11% |
| Mosby | 10 | 14 | 9/50% |
Brooks had 2 solo tackles and the huge blocked field goal. Slaton had 1 sack. No other interior defensive linemen had any statistics. Caleb Williams got the ball out of his hands so fast that it would be difficult for any defensive tackle to generate pressure or even a lot of interior push. De'andre Smith had 71 yards on 14 carries (5.07-yard average), but other than toss play around the left end that ruptured into a 39-yard touchdown run, Swift gained 65 yards on 23 carries. Roschon Johnson gained 33 yards on 10 carries, but he gained tough yards, and I suspect that quite a few of his runs would be deemed successful runs. I think the interior guys were okay.
Gary had 6 tackles (3 solo), 2 quarterback hits, one of which was a sack. Cox had 3 tackles, one of which was a sack. He had 2 quarterback hits and a tackle for loss. Cox was unblocked on both of his impact plays but he showed good recognition on those plays. Enagbare had 3 tackles (1 solo) and a quarterback hit (which should have been a sack but Williams wriggled out of it). Mosby had 1 assisted tackle.
LINEBACKERS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Walker | 72 | 100 | 4/22% |
| Cooper | 51 | 71 | 8/44% |
| McDuffie | 21 | 29 | 5/28% |
| Wilson | 13 | 18 | 12/67% |
| Hopper | 11/61% |
Quay Walker had 8 tackles (5 solo) and a pass defensed. Yes, Walker bounced backwards off some runners and missed his run gap a few times (see Andy Herman's tweet here). He does some good things as well, so he is frustrating. Cooper had 7 tackles (4 solo). Wilson and McDuffie both had 2 tackles and each had 1 solo tackles.
DEFENSIVE BACKS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| McKinney | 72 | 100 | 8/44% |
| Nixon | 71 | 99 | 9/50% |
| Ev Williams | 71 | 99 | |
| Valentine | 64 | 89 | 2/11% |
| Bullard | 52 | 72 | 8/44% |
| Alexander | 10 | 14 | |
| Stokes | 4 | 6 | 2/11% |
| Ballentine | 1 | 1 | 12/67% |
| Anderson | 12/67% |
Surely the Packers should know how defend an offense like the one Malik Willis runs? I guess not. I suppose allowing 19 points is not bad. I kept expecting one of the defensive backs to jump one of Caleb's quick passes. I think Rasul Douglas would have been biding his time. I think Jaire Alexander would have looked for an opportunity, though he might have dropped it anyway. I don't think McKinney had much opportunity. Click here for Caleb Williams' passing chart per Next Gen Stats.
McKinney had 9 tackles (6 solo). McKinney allowed a run to rupture into a big play when he got juked by Swift. Valentine had 9 tackles (5 solo). Yes, Roschon Johnson steam rolled Valentine but Stokes would have been worse and Alexander would just get injured in that kind of run support. Bullard had 8 tackles (6 solo). Evan Cooper had 7 tackles (4 solo). Nixon had 4 tackles (3 solo) in yet another up and down performance. That is a lot of tackles by safeties and cornerbacks.
SPECIAL TEAMS:
McManus made both of his extra points. His kickoffs were fine. Whelan only punt was fine. Brooks blocked a field goal to allow the Packers to walk off the field with a win.
Photo courtesy of Mark Hoffman, USA Today Network
RB: 1.06
TE: 1.37
WR: 2.54
DT: 2.03
DE: 1.99
LB: 2.18
DB: 4.79
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________




Comments (30)
Thegreatreynoldo
November 18, 2024 at 05:38 am
"After entering the week with a slower release than 24 quarterbacks at 2.9 seconds on average, Williams sped that up to 2.42 seconds vs. the Packers, per Next Gen Stats. That’s faster than any quarterback has averaged this season, the Dolphins’ Tua Tagovailoa leading qualified passers at 2.44 (quarterbacks have had faster single games)." See the link below of Williams' passing chart from Next Gen. [Okay, I had to put the link in the article - the link is under the DB section.]
“We got poor with our rush lanes and he was running right up the middle,” Packers head coach Matt LaFleur said of Williams. “Where they hurt us, though, especially in the first half, was his ability to make plays.” Williams had 60 of his 70 rushing yards in the first half.
They had the ball 36:21 minutes to gb's 22:39. They were 12 of 19 on 3rd and 4th down conversions. 72 snaps to GB's 46. Each team had 7 possession but one of GB's was a kneel down. GB was 1 of 6 on 3rd and 4th down conversions. At least GB was 3 of 5 in the red zone. Too bad two of those trips resulted in zero points. You have to be able to get off the field - otherwise the opponent can dictate the style of play. And that was 8 plays, 34 yards 3:26 off the clock, (FG), 10 plays, 51 yards, 6:26 off the clock (punt), 13 plays, 76 yards, 5:42 off the clock (TD). Detroit had possessions in the 2nd half of 10, 11, 12 plays, and 7 plays (and that was them getting a field goal blocked on 2nd down) with time running out.
dobber
November 18, 2024 at 03:58 pm
AND YET...even though we all saw what the Bears were doing, the Packers' DBs played off and never tried to jump those quick dump-offs. They seemed to play the whole game as if they had a two or three score lead.
Lphill
November 18, 2024 at 05:52 am
Nixon, Valentine and Ballentine would not be starters on any other team , they are special teamers at most .
GregC
November 18, 2024 at 06:22 am
Ballentine is a third-string player. He played one snap in this game.
HawkPacker
November 18, 2024 at 08:53 am
I have been saying for sometime now that we should not have given Nixon $6 million per year. He is just not worth it.
I have also been saying that they messed up the 1st round of this year's draft by picking an offensive tackle to play guard. They should have picked DeJean for our defensive backfield!
murf7777
November 18, 2024 at 05:58 am
I thought Mlf not kicking the FG was puzzling. I realize the numbers say it’s about even odds whether you kick or go for it, but I think you have to put it into perspective. You are going against the #1 red zone D, so that should factor in. Other than not having any finger nails left, it sure was a great way to win the game, I almost feel sorry for da bears….not!
dobber
November 18, 2024 at 04:00 pm
The problem was the play calls that got them to 4th down to begin with...slow developing plays running wide. Ugh.
"it sure was a great way to win the game,"
It means we get the pleasure of a few weeks of "fan fail" home vids as they miss the kick.
GregC
November 18, 2024 at 06:21 am
Stokes' snaps were way down. Only four. I wonder if that will continue or if it had something to do with matchups in this game.
Edgerrin Cooper had the second most snaps of LBs in this game, by a long shot, yet as far as I could tell he had virtually no impact. I saw Caleb Williams outrun him to the sideline a couple of times. Cooper is exactly the player you call on to stop a good running QB like Williams. It was a rough day for him. Let's hope he learned something.
The low snap count for Emmanuel Wilson (only 3) was strange. He made them count, though. Two carries for 17 yards.
I see that Dontayvion Wicks was a distant fourth in snap counts, and I think he was only targeted once, or maybe not at all. Looks like they've finally decided to curb his involvement in the offense, at least temporarily.
It was great to see Brenton Cox getting on the field so much (almost as many snaps as Van Ness) and making some plays. They needed to shake up the DE rotation.
T7Steve
November 18, 2024 at 06:22 am
TGR, what does it tell us when Stokes only played 4 snaps on D when Alexander was hurt after 14? Was he dinged too?
How many more yards would Watson have had if he'd been hit in stride? Seemed he had to stop and wait 3 seconds for the ball to catch up to him on the interception worthy pass TGR mentions above. Seemed like that happened on all but one of the times he was targeted.
72-46 plays. That seems by far the worst all season. Only one punt might mean that's misleading.
Thegreatreynoldo
November 18, 2024 at 07:03 am
I think it means Stokes and Ballentine are in a lower tier than Valentine. Or at least, I think it ought to mean that.
I think it means that McDuffie and especially Wilson are in a lower tier than Walker and Cooper. [I think had Eric Wilson been blessed with great talent he would have been a great player - smart, fundamentally sound and pretty instinctive, but just can't always get there.]
I don't understand why Emanuel Wilson got so few snaps. I suppose because there were so few snaps, Jacobs could handle almost all of it. When he needed a brief rest, they opted for Brooks' blocking. But maybe I am wrong and Brooks has passed Wilson on the depth chart or maybe Wilson tweaked something.
GB has very tight rotations at CB and safety, but seem more willing to rotate at ILB, DT, DE. Some rotation at WR but that rotation seems like it is forming some consistentcy ( I don't know when and why they bring in Melton - I am not against Melton, mind you, just don't know what motivates bringing him in instead of Heath, for example).
T7Steve
November 18, 2024 at 07:28 am
Do you think Melton comes in for Reed because they run the same type of play packages for them like the end arounds and stuff?
Coldworld
November 18, 2024 at 07:28 am
Hafley was determined to play zone until late in the game when he was trying to blitz more as Williams asserted himself. Stokes is not a zone CB. Valentine is not ideally either, but Stokes is probably more one dimensional press and tight coverage. The right call for the game plan regardless of longer term meaning. Unfortunately the game plan was deeply flawed from the outset.
Thegreatreynoldo
November 18, 2024 at 07:52 am
That could be, as well.
Speaking of zone coverage., I remember someone in the watch party screaming in the watch party that Valentine had just bounced off Johnson and given up two completions in a short period. He is guilty on bouncing off Johnson, but he was in zone coverage that apparently did not ask him to match up with the receivers on those completions. Both completions were short and the tackle got made quickly.
LLCHESTY
November 18, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Walker had one nice pass breakup but why Wilson isn't in for him on the Bears last drive is a mystery to me. If a guy is top 10 in the league in coverage let him play in those situations until he's not.
Thegravedigger
November 18, 2024 at 06:24 pm
Brooks clearly passed Wilson and I'm not really sure why. Wilson is a tough runner. And eric Wilson might not always get there but he makes a lot more plays than quay. Quay blows plays. And gets blown off the ball. It's hard to watch him play after play lately when we watched Wilson do a better job than him for a few weeks. Idk I don't watch film but naked eye tells me Wilson is the better guy for the mike job.
Coldworld
November 18, 2024 at 06:31 am
I thought, aside from the one bad throw, which was a good decision, just failed execution, Love played pretty well. However, I do agree that the passing offense seems to have no rhythm. Moreover, we seem to not use the shorter middle. The passing concepts just feel very disjointed. It seems like it’s Jacobs or big chunk play routes.
Emmanuel Wilson is being under used. I do not understand why. He’s not alone. For the second week, Reed seemed an afterthought. I don’t know why against that D. Likewise we barely targeted Kraft and the TEs seemed an afterthought. It was good to see Watson getting snaps over Wicks. Hell we eventually even got him on s crossing route. Why does that seem so hard for LaFleur to dial up?
Our red zone offense is completely bereft of ideas or inspiration. Maybe its time for LaFleur to let one of his subordinates handle play design there, because its now been seasons since we’ve looked to have any verve there.
I’ve been pretty pleased with Hafley so far, with the exception of the first half approach versus the Vikings. Yesterday, however, was his worst overall game. We managed to resurrect Williams confidence, visibly. After the OC change, Chicago made no secret that they would try to give Williams quick and easy reads and help him stay upright and get his skill players involved. Hafley seems to be the only person on the planet who didn’t see that coming or that Williams was likely to be allowed to run more. Nor did he seem to recognize it during the game.
I thought Quay Walker was awful. I’ve not been a big hater of him by comparison with many, but yesterday he just seemed to be in the wrong place at the wrong time continually. I have said that Nixon had no place playing perimeter corner once an opponent starts to throw beyond short range. Yesterday he was dire. Valentine looked better, despite also looking rusty. If Stokes is a write off, play Rochell. Hafley not only called a stinker but needs to get a grip of his personnel assessments.
The DL is simply not working. Not good enough in a 4:3 context? Perhaps, but that’s our base not our most frequent look. It’s not working out of base either. Not even against a bad O line. Cox was a bright spot in terms of upside, but needs to learn contain. However, the general rush and also the blitz was fairly pathetic against a pretty poor OL. Part of that was continually letting the Bears short outs get yards. Part of it was playing a lot of zone earlier. We just are not competent in zone Mr. Hafley. When will you grasp that. We did better, relatively, once we went man, well Valentine did. Nixon isn’t good at that either.
A very poor day from the coaches. Poor planning and tactics. The exception was Bisaccia. STs had perhaps its best day in ages across the board (though Whelan had to rescue at least one basket case of a long snap),
That was not a performance to be proud of. It is a win to cherish simply because it was so crushing for the Bears. It also probably kept our post season hopes alive: 0 and 3 in the division is not a good place to be. However, if we play like that we don’t deserve and won’t have post season success. It’s starting to look like the red zone and rush deficiencies are not going to get better. Our IOL is probably undone by a long term failure to value run blocking that is both at odds with the move to Jacobs and has for seasons been an Achilles heel in the red zone. Our pass rush looks to be both ill suited to the players we have in terms of scheme and approach.
I am getting weary of disjointed performances and dubious player selection along with never seeming to learn lessons. The LaFleur era is frayed. Pretty, but ineffectual. He needs to step up fast and significantly. We are going nowhere but mediocrity with the product he’s currently delivering. If we are right that there is little difference in overall roster quality between us and Detroit, then there is a large difference in production against weaker teams. Thats on the head coach, and it’s undeniable that there is a vast differential.
T7Steve
November 18, 2024 at 06:43 am
What did you think of the 2-point conversion play? Not blocked very well but right up in the strength of the Bears D.
Did it seem to you that they were only going to do as much as they had to, to win and not show anything more than they had to? Almost backfired if so.
Coldworld
November 18, 2024 at 07:05 am
The 2 pointer was poorly executed, but really, did the Bears not see it coming just as we did? Going for it didn’t bother me, but it only emphasizes what I said about us being bereft of ideas or imagination in the red zone. This from a supposed offensive genius and not new this season, though perhaps even worse.
LaFleur never plays to crush the life out of opponents and his definition of adequate margin is questionably small, but yesterday the inept D just kept the O off the field far too long. We should be very concerned about Hafley’s love affair with Nixon and his whole DL philosophy—it goes beyond player ability I suspect. We don’t have zone corners. I understand, he wants them, but that doesn’t make them appear if Jaire is absent. Well, Rochell is a better candidate based on physical traits, but Hafley doesn’t try him.
Hafley needs to do some serious self scouting. That was his worst day, and weaknesses are starting to look congenital, not growth pains and his personnel and tactical choices seem to be exacerbating them. Yesterday it kept our O off the field and let them get into rhythm. I think it was that more than LaFleur’s lack of killer instinct.
Guam
November 18, 2024 at 08:08 am
Loved all of your post except the paragraph on the D-line. Chicago got both their starting tackles back from injury for this game and that made them better. This was not the same O-line that gave up nine sacks the week before. Additionally Williams was getting the ball out very quickly (under 2.5 seconds) and almost no D-lineman can get home in under 2.5 seconds unless he is completely unblocked.
I would criticize the D-line for poor containment on Williams but otherwise the pass rush was okay and the run defense was good save one play. The flaw in the defense yesterday was the secondary (scheme and players).
Given the obvious Bear game plan of getting the ball out quickly, I do not understand why Hafley didn't mix in more man coverage as well as bringing the zone down closer to the LOS. The Bears threw underneath all day and Hafley and the secondary never reacted.
Offensively you simply can not make two trips inside the 15 yard line and come away with zero points, particularly when you only get seven possessions during the entire game. Love's untimely interception and LaFleur's decision to go for it left the Packer offense not scoring enough points to put the game away. LaFleur needs to get much better in the red zone and quickly or the Packer post season will be very short.
dobber
November 19, 2024 at 10:16 am
"I would criticize the D-line for poor containment on Williams but otherwise the pass rush was okay and the run defense was good save one play."
The Packers showed such improvement this season in containing running QBs (Hurts, Richardson, Murray). Somehow that all got away from them on Sunday.
rememberWhitehurst
November 18, 2024 at 06:45 am
No special teams snaps listed for Brooks. Oh, he had one. Did he ever have one.
Thegreatreynoldo
November 19, 2024 at 01:46 am
Oops. Fixed. thanks
GregC
November 18, 2024 at 06:58 am
So true about the passes not being in rhythm. Thankfully Jordan Love played well enough to overcome that problem yesterday (ironically, his one interception was on an easy pass), but it's a tough way to make a living.
It was a gritty performance by Love. He took a big hit when he tried to score on that failed 4th and goal play and took another big hit when he tried to score on the last drive and got knocked out of bounds at the one-yard line. I was glad they let him get the TD on the next play. His teammates must be gaining more and more respect for him when they see plays like that.
I'm not going to rip Love for the 48-yard completion to Watson. I suppose Xavier McKinney might have intercepted it, but McKinney wasn't on the field, and Love knew that.
Speaking of McKinney, I was annoyed with him for talking smack about D.J. Moore during the week, getting Moore all fired up for the game, and then McKinney went out and had probably his worst game as a Packer. McKinney needs to shut up and let his play do the talking.
Thegreatreynoldo
November 19, 2024 at 01:40 am
I am just being consistent. I "ripped" his decision to throw the TD pass to Wicks while he was falling down backwards. I didn't like the decision to throw a TD to a triple covered Reed a few weeks ago.
Love is throwing 1.375 interceptions per game. That extrapolates to 23 INTS per year.
Love is throwing 2.00 TDs per game. Extrapolates to 34 TD per full season.
I am not impressed by QB who throw 34 TD to 23 INTs.
egbertsouse
November 18, 2024 at 08:51 am
Quay Walker is out a couple games and the defense plays pretty well. Quay Walker returns and the defense stinks. Hmmmm…. I wonder if there is a connection?
tobinrote
November 18, 2024 at 08:54 am
I guess i will never understand what the coaches see in Q Walker to get him so many snaps. Herman's twitter feed says it all, but so does just watching him on TV; but at least they are cutting down on LVN's snaps and getting people who can make an occasional play on the field. I really cannot figure out what the brass saw on tape to draft Walker and LVN in the first round. and when oh when is Love going to see the field and make easy accurate throws? how on earth did he so miss on an easy pitch and catch of ten yards to an open Kraft for that int?
NFLfan
November 18, 2024 at 11:04 am
@TR-Green Bay Brass saw a high RAS scores on both LVN and Walker but neglected some of the objective scouting reports on both.
NFLfan
November 18, 2024 at 10:48 am
Green Bay's overall coaching, like Jet's coaching is soft and a bit confused.
Players respond to tough but fair coaches who hold players accountable and discipline immediately.
Someone with the temperament of Belichick or Mike Vrabel needs to have a word with Rashan, Jaire and Kenny.
Thegreatreynoldo
November 19, 2024 at 02:04 am
PFF thinks I'm an idiot stuff:
1. WR Christian Watson: 93.0
2. RT Zach Tom: 73.8
3. QB Jordan Love: 73.7
4. WR Jayden Reed: 73.6
5. RB Josh Jacobs: 71.5
1. LG Elgton Jenkins: 48.4
2. TE Ben Sims: 50.3
3. WR Dontayvion Wicks: 53.1
4. TE Tucker Kraft: 54.4
5. WR Romeo Doubs: 56.5
1. DE Rashan Gary: 79.0
2. LB Eric Wilson: 69.5
3. CB Jaire Alexander: 65.9
4. LB Quay Walker: 62.6
5. LB Isaiah McDuffie: 61.0
1. DE Lukas Van Ness: 33.1
2. CB Keisean Nixon: 45.8
3. DE Kingsley Enagbare: 49.4
4. DL Devonte Wyatt: 49.6
5. DL Kenny Clark: 50.3
I don't think there are many surprises here. Maybe Quay Walker. I don't hate Quay like some fans do but his "why are you going there" moments are glaring, Reed only ran 12 routes so 23 yards/12 routes isn't so bad. Why only 12 routes though? Wicks only ran 6 routes. Maybe he is still dropping them in practice? Sims' blocking was average and he had no receptions. Iguess he is perpetually going to get PFF grades in the fifties, though sometimes he catches a safety valve pass. Kenny Clark did not have a pressure for the third straight game.
NFLfan
November 19, 2024 at 09:22 am
It's the Defense that is causing the majority of the problems-there is below-average pass rush, no reliable elite corner play.
The DL has regressed across the board-players? coaching?
2 additional D players are compromising the team-Walker and LVN. In total, there are 5 players on D who are not helpful to the team.
The lack of Pass Rush will stop the Packers from advancing.--Josh Allen would have his way with this DL.