Packers Time Has Likely Come To Play In London

It's sounding more and more like the Green Bay Packers will play one of their regular season games in London.  Rumors have been swirling that they'll head overseas in 2016.  Head coach Mike McCarthy has hinted that he's not a huge fan of the idea of having to get his team across the pond and ready to play a game.  Then there's the logistics of dealing with the time change and then trying to return to normal when they get back in the States.  The team would get their bye week following the trip to help them readjust and so then the question becomes when that game would take place in the schedule.  For such a regimented individual such as McCarthy, it's easy to understand his hesitation.

Quarterback Aaron Rodgers has spoken in favor of playing a game in London when asked.  The experience of playing somewhere different and on different soil is a rare opportunity that face teams and their players.  Judging by the number of fans from the United Kingdom who follow the Packers and follow the NFL, the game is clearly gaining more and more popularity there.  Of course, the original football is still numero uno, that being what we call soccer.  But no doubt the NFL fever is picking up steam in the U.K.

One thing to consider about a game in London is that even though neither team calls it home, one team would be the home team and give up a home game back at their usual venue in the U.S.  As important as games at Lambeau Field are to the Packers and Green Bay, it would absolutely shock me if the NFL had Green Bay slated as the home team.  Bet on their being the visitors.  The Jacksonville Jaguars have played a game in London the past few seasons and are expected to extend that deal into next season.  As fate would have it, the Packers are set to face the Jags at home in 2016.  That's likely the matchup if the Packers are chosen.  And barring any major changes in either team over the next year, the Packers would stand a good chance at scoring a win in their inaugural game in London.

I think the Packers playing in London would be a good thing.  They have such a broad fan base and many based in the U.K. who would pack the stadium to see their team live for perhaps the first time.  It seems the NFL wants its marquis teams playing there eventually to give the fans a chance to see them and let's not ignore the financial gain.  If the 2015 season plays out how many of the experts and oddsmakers are predicting, London will be getting the defending Super Bowl champions.

There are many takes on whether the Packers playing overseas is a good thing or not.  Chime in with your thoughts and I'm hoping to hear from some of our followers and fans out in the U.K.!

-------------------

Jason is a freelance writer on staff since 2012 and also co-hosts Cheesehead TV Live, Pulse of the Pack and Pack A Day podcasts.  You can follow him on Twitter here

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (13)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Since'61's picture

July 15, 2015 at 04:48 pm

Another unnecessary money grab by the NFL. I don't like the idea of the Packers playing in London. MM is correct in that it is difficult to adjust to the time difference for people who do not travel long distances regularly. Also many teams have returned from their London games and have complained about the quality of the field at the stadium. We don't need to risk injury to our players due to a poor quality field. I would prefer for the Packers could find a way to avoid playing in London. Then there is the fact that the game would be televised in the U.S. pretty early in the day, although we can record it and watch it any time we like. Worst case scenario is the Packers lose one their 8 Lambeau games, which is unfair to the season ticket holders. For now I'll stay focused on the 2015 season. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

July 15, 2015 at 05:26 pm

Agree. 2015 is all that I care to focus on.

0 points
0
0
Matt LeClair's picture

July 15, 2015 at 07:39 pm

I think MM likes regularity and consistency yet I think he does pretty good with the whole Thursday games crap. At least that's what I remember with my crappy memory, as for the field Soldier Field has some atrocious field. Every game the announcers spend more time complaining about the field than they do about the game. Also these guys are paid crap tons of money, they better be able to get over some time difference.

It's not like they are rocket scientist or performing some advanced surgery. They need to perform for 3 hours in a day. I personally think it would be cool so long as it's an away game for them.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

July 15, 2015 at 06:13 pm

Blerch.

0 points
0
0
Mojo's picture

July 15, 2015 at 06:40 pm

I think they usually start the London games at 9:30 ET or 8:30 central. Could be quite a challenge to be vertical by then and get my pre-game rituals in.

0 points
0
0
SteveCheez's picture

July 15, 2015 at 07:07 pm

Even worse, then, for those of us out here on the Left Coast.
I just hate this on so many levels, that's just one more.

0 points
0
0
Tommy Phillips's picture

July 15, 2015 at 10:58 pm

I like it. As long as it's an away game, I'm all for it. It's not like the London games are going away anytime soon, if ever. Someone has to play in them, and the Packers might as well have their turn.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

July 16, 2015 at 08:12 am

The only positives I see:

1) It's an away game for us

2) Aaron Rodgers wants it

0 points
0
0
BeyKlaw's picture

July 16, 2015 at 11:30 am

The NFL should just extend the regular season to 17 games by eliminating 1 pre-season game. Then each team can have 8 home games, 8 away games and 1 game at a neutral site (London, Toronto, Mexico, Tokyo, LA, etc).

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

July 16, 2015 at 10:18 pm

I'm shocked that I kinda like that idea.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

July 17, 2015 at 09:23 pm

If I was Mark Murphy I would never agree to it. I travel to Europe often for my job and I know how to deal with the Jet Lag, but it takes a serious effort and it still interferes with my ability to function at a high-level.

I'm not going to try to compile the W/L record for teams the week after a trip to Europe, but I seriously doubt it is good.

0 points
0
0
Philip Young's picture

July 18, 2015 at 06:48 am

I live in UK & would love to see Packers play in London, BUT, I know how hard it would be for the players.. I have travelled to Green Bay & the journey was bad. OK players will fly on their own plane rather than scheduled.

0 points
0
0
ray nichkee's picture

July 18, 2015 at 07:16 am

I dont like the idea. Its just to make the rich richer. Let the brits watch people chase the round ball around and only see a few points scored.

0 points
0
0