Packers Snap Counts V. Dallas: Week 19, 2023

Packers upset the Cowbys with some unusual snap counts.

 

The Packers elevated CB David Long from the PS, but when it was determined that Jaire Alexander would be able to play, they made Long inactive.  [Long still gets the extra money.]  The inactive players were Long, Caleb Jones, Malik Heath, Benny Sapp, Brenton Cox, and the injured AJ Dillon.

 

Player Snaps % STs
Myers 56 100 7/25%
walker 56 100 7/25%
Tom 53 95 7/25%
Jenkins 49 88  
Runyan 34 61 7/25%
Rhyan 26 46  
Newman 3 5 7/25%
Nijman 3 5 7/25%
       

 

 

The offensive line won another game in the trenches, though this time it was not a dominant effort.  The pass protection was excellent.  Jordan Love was only hit 3 times and sacked just once.  While there was some pressure at times, the line and Love were usually able to buy enough time for long-developing routes to materialize, even if it meant some throws off the back foot.  

 

The run blocking warmed up as the game progressed.  The Packers gained 143 yards on 33 carries for a 4.3-yard average for the game.  The run blocking was hit or miss in the first half.  The Packers gained just 32 yards on 15 carries in the first half to average 2.1-yards per carry.  Of the 15 carries, which were all by running backs, 6 would be deemed successful runs. 

 

The line started opening wide running lanes in the second half with some regularity.  The Packers’ running backs ran the ball 8 times in the second half and gained 89 yards (Love had a kneel down for the ninth carry).  The Cowboys only had one tackle for loss (on Aaron Jones).

 

Player Snaps % STs
Jones 35 62  
Wilson 15 27  
Taylor 6 11 9/32%

 

 

Aaron Jones finished with 118 yards on 21 carries, a 5.6-yard average with 2 touchdowns.  He caught his only  target for 13 yards.  Jones has excellent vision and processes quickly.  His play speed to the hole (or crease) is very fast.  He picks up the blitz very well and can run an expanded route tree as a receiver.  Trying to replace him with a second round pick is a risky proposition.  He won’t turn 30 until next December.  Let us hope the Packers can find a way to retain him in 2024, though giving third contracts to running backs is also risky.

 

Emanuel Wilson gained 2 yards on 3 carries in the first half.  I thought he did very well to get back to the line of scrimmage on one of those carries and to gain a yard on another carry.  Wilson added 18 more yards on 5 carries in the second half.  Patrick Taylor gained 6 yards on 3 carries.

 

Player Snaps % STs
Kraft 45 80 15/54%
Musgrave 15 27 3/11%
Sims 13 23 3-11%
Deguara 10 18 9/32%

 

 

Tucker Kraft caught both his targets in the first half for 15 yards, and dropped his only other target in the second half.  He also had a holding call.  Still, his blocking has improved significantly in the latter part of this season.   Ben Sims threw a couple of nice blocks but had no statistics. Deguara played.

 

Luke Musgrave caught all 3 of his targets for 52 yards, including a 38-yard touchdown.  The touchdown in the second half was the dagger, and it was a great play call.  Musgrave started in the slot to Love’s left and ran a deep crosser, catching Love’s pass well downfield near the numbers on the right side.  The offensive line and Love, who threw the pass while falling backwards, bought the time to make the long-developing play work.

 

Player Snaps % STs
Love 53 95%  
Clifford 3 5  

 

 

Jordan Love completed 16 of 21 passes (76.19%) for 272 yards (12.95 yards/attempt) for 3 touchdowns and no interceptions.  His passer rating was 157.2.  There was a dropped pass.  Love did not have a turnover-worthy pass. He threw a dime for a touchdown to Doubs in the end zone.  Love did a lot of damage in the first half (13/16 for 195 yards with 2 TDs), but he puts points up in the second half by completing 3 of his 5 passes for 87 yards (17.4yards/att) with a touchdown.  

 

Moreover, Love appeared to change protections and/or the play altogether with very successful results.  He looks like a franchise quarterback, an expensive one.

 

Player Snaps % STs
Doubs 39 70 2/7%
Wicks 31 55%  
Reed 26 46 5/18%
Watson 23 41  
Melton 22 49 8/29%

 

This was the Romeo Doubs show.  Doubs exploded for 152 yards on 6 receptions (6 targets), good for a 25.2-yard average, with a touchdown.  Doubs had 102 yards on 4 receptions in the first half.  In the first half, Wicks contributed 25 yards and a touchdown, Watson had 9 yards and Melton 7.  Only Doubs (2 for 49 yards and a TD) and Musgrave (1 for a 38-yard touchdown) caught a pass in the second half.   Reed had 3 targets but no receptions. Perhaps next year the staff can figure out how to play 2 TEs without taking Reed out.

 

 

Player Snaps % STs
Wyatt 50 53 5/18%
Clark 48 51  
Brooks 45 47 5/18%
Wooden  34 36 5/18%
Slaton 23 24 10/36%
       

 

 

Clark, Slaton, and Brooks each had 2 tackles with Clark and Brooks having a QB hit.  Clark had a tackle for loss and several pressures.  Wooden had 3 tackles (2 solo).  Wyatt had 1 assisted tackle and a couple of pressures.  OC Tyler Biadasz was the weakest link.  The Cowboys gained 123 yards on 25 carries for a 4.9-yard average.  The average was 5.0 in the first half.  The Cowboys’ running backs gained 67 yards on 17 carries for a 3.7-yard average.  It was a reasonably good effort against an offensive line with 3 All-Pros.  Prescott escaped 6 times for 45 yards. The Cowboys ran 95 offensive plays and still lost. Think about that! 

Wyatt getting the most snaps is interesting.  I thought he was up and down against the run.  Wooden and Brooks getting more snaps than Slaton is a little surprising.  Getting a big lead perhaps meant valuing pass rush ovre run defense. 

 

 

Player Snaps % STs
Campbell 75 79 5/18%
Walker 67 71 2/7%
Wilson 20 21 19/68%
McDuffie 16 17 9/32%
Smith 55 58  
Van Ness 50 53 6/21%
Enagbare 40 42 7/25%
Gary 39 41  
Welch     14/50%

 

 

Van Ness had 3 tackles (2 solo) with a sack and a tackle for loss.  The sack was a bull rush which benefited from excellent coverage.  Preston Smith had one tackle.  He was credited with a sack which also benefited greatly from coverage) and a pass defensed.  Enagbare had 1 tackle and 2 QB hits.  Rashan Gary had 1 tackle and a QB hit.  They all had multiple pressures.  Gary failed to dominate RT Terrence Steele.  Gary and Smith both rushed too far up-field allowing Prescott to scramble for good gains. Gary coming last in snaps is surprising.  

 

Quay Walker had 11 tackles (8 solo) and Campbell added 8 (6 solo) plus a QB hit and a pass defensed.  Eric Wilson had no statistics.  I thought the coverage was pretty good, especially in the first half when the RBs combined for just 7 receiving yards.  Anyone who was responsible for covering TE Jake Ferguson had headaches.  The Packers did okay in the first half, limiting Ferguson to 4 receptions on 5 targets for 31 yards and a TD.  Ferguson added 6 receptions on 7 targets for 63 more yards and 2 more TDs in the second half.

 

Player Snaps % STs
Valentine 90 95 8/29%
Owens 89 94 18-64%
Nixon 89 94 8/29%
Savage 79 83% 7/25%
Alexander 52 55  
Ballentine  43 45 12/43%
Johnson 23 24 8/29%
Anderson 13 14 13-46%
Rochell 5 5 16/57%
       

 

 

 

Keisean Nixon had 11 tackles (7 solo) with a sack and 2 passes defensed.  The sack was a good defensive call that he executed well.  Nixon was very active.  He did miss a tackle at the line of scrimmage and another after a catch that led to sizable gains.  Valentine had 8 tackles (6 solo) and Alexander had 7 (3 solo) and a huge interception at the Dallas 19-yard line which subsequently led to a TD.  Alexander left the game early with an ankle injury and did not return, which was a shame because he was looking like one of the best CBs in the NFL.   Ballentine had 5 tackles (4 solo) and Savage had 4 tackles and a Pick 6.  

 

The coverage was very good in the first half.  Prescott only threw for 87 yards and a 47 passer rating in the first half.  It seemed like the defensive scheme confused the Cowboys and Prescott.  Unfortunately, Prescott threw for 316 yards in the second half.  Either the Packers really missed Alexander, figured out the defense, or Barry changed it in the second half.  Perhaps it was a little of all three.

 

I find it interesting that the Packers went for the touchdown on 4th and 2 while up with 10:23 left in the game up 41-16.  I also think playing Love and Jones when there was only 2:33 left in the game while up 48-32.  I think it means that Barry’s job is not safe though I am not certain about it.

 

SPECIAL TEAMS:

 

Whelan punted 3 times for a 37.7-yard average, but all three were inside the 20, and indeed, inside the 10 if I recall correctly.  Carlson made 6 of 7 extra points.  There were a couple of high snaps, including the one he missed, but I thought Whelan did a good enough job getting it down.  The coverage teams were okay.  

 

RB:  1.02

TE: 1.48  ( a high number)

WR: 2.51

DL:  2.10  ( a low number)

ILB:  1.87

OLB: 1.94

DBs: 5.08

 

Stats courtesy of NFLgsis

 

 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

7 points
 

Comments (31)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
HawkPacker's picture

January 15, 2024 at 06:51 am

" I also think playing Love and Jones when there was only 2:33 left in the game while up 48-32."

I agree but as I mentioned in an earlier thread, LaFleur took Love out of the game one series too soon. I believe there were over 6 minutes left in the game and we just ran the ball at that point with no success. If Love would have been in the game, they probably would have had 2-3 first downs essentially running out most of the clock. Hopefully, LaFleur learned from that.

5 points
5
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2024 at 08:11 am

LaFleur, like Barry, went into already won mode too early. The D got softer and softer from mid 3rd quarter and Dallas got moving.

Plowing Taylor up the gut 3 times with 6 plus minutes to go was too early. I was hoping we would at least try to extend that drive as we did last time Clifford took the field. Perhaps it all went to LaFleur’s head a bit.

Barry still baffles me. Why change what is working and why not go back to it when the change isn’t? When you get it right, stick with it surely? It just seems like a personality thing with these two.

5 points
5
0
PeteK's picture

January 15, 2024 at 12:48 pm

Compared to the Chiefs game where they went after the QB even with a big lead. Running the ball didn't bother me.

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

January 15, 2024 at 07:15 am

Thanks, TGR. I was worried this morning when your "counts" weren't up yet.

The snap counts were weird because they were playing backups as much as possible even early in the second half the announcers noted it, so I started paying more attention.

Hope we get back to healthy before next week's outing. What happened to Enagbare? MLF said it was serious?

Do you believe we're advancing in the playoffs? The Playoff???

1 points
1
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2024 at 07:21 am

Good morning,
Thank You Aaron Rodgers, we just might owe you one, maybe!
Before the 2022 season Aaron, you either asked for, begged for, or demanded that the Packers bring back Tom Clements as QB coach. Be careful what you wish for!
What Clements has done with Jordan Love from the beginning of the season to the precise, surgical QB we saw yesterday is nothing short of amazing. Even at this early stage Love seems to have the ability to throw to where the receivers are vs. where 'You' thought they were supposed to be, Aaron. No eye-rolling, no stink-face, no bullshit!
I know that one great game does not make a QB career, but if Gutey was right, and Love continues to improve and strive in LaFleur's system he might break ALL of your records Aaron, and we know how much you'd hate that. If it's any consolation, I myself am eating some crow regarding my early season assessment of Jordan Love while you had confidence in him. You were right and I was wrong, what can I say?
Thanks again A-Rod, we still love you, but as it stands, we don't miss you!

2 points
3
1
vin0770's picture

January 15, 2024 at 07:47 am

My son told me during the game that Carlson has missed the most extra points in the NFL this year, is that correct?

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 15, 2024 at 09:55 am

That is what has been reported by the media. I didn't check.

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

January 15, 2024 at 10:24 am

What were the averages? You usually put them at the end. I didn't understand them at first till you explained them to me.

I'm guessing DL over 2.4 but, I usually guess wrong. Have no clue about TEs.

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 15, 2024 at 10:52 am

I just posted them. They were late due to decrepitude. The Packers played just 2.10 true defensive lineman on average per play.

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

January 15, 2024 at 10:57 am

Thanks.

Seemed like it would be more than 2.1 but, maybe the all the plays the Cowboys ran in the second half against the prevent did it.

2 points
2
0
tobinrote's picture

January 15, 2024 at 07:58 am

imagine giving up 510 yards and 90 plays to an opponent and still winning. i suppose that is a result of us 'losing' one possession on a pick six, and then playing prevent an entire half. but as good as this win was, there is still a problem with the D coordinator and i would replace him and send Carlson packing too as a failed experiment. but oh my how good the O looked and Love just earned himself a very big payday.

1 points
2
1
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2024 at 09:11 am

Tobin,
" a result of us playing prevent an entire half"
Yes, 510 yards, the almost expected result of a Joe Barry "prevent" defense!
Thank God, the "O", and the "O" coaches for one hell of a game!

2 points
2
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 15, 2024 at 10:55 am

GB lost the time of possession battle as well. Since they only have 5 DL, I wonder if some of the big guys just couldn't handle 95 snaps?

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2024 at 11:10 am

Because Bend with breaking plus a few fast offensive scores is a recipe for defensive disaster. We just let them March up and down pressure free in the second half. TOP shows it

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2024 at 08:16 am

One little nugget this week was that all Doubs receptions were in the middle, between the hashes. He seems much more effective allowed to find space. That seems to come more with the two TE sets. It’s a battle for playing time and that’s good. It will be interesting to see whether next week the usage is similar or if this was opponent specific.

PS: why does this article always seem to get buried? I find myself having to look for it every week. This is one of the best pieces … come on Al, let’s not bury this weekly!

6 points
6
0
HawkPacker's picture

January 15, 2024 at 08:56 am

I have no problem finding it but I wonder if there is an issue from some as usually there are not as many comments as I would expect.

2 points
2
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 15, 2024 at 11:18 am

It varies. It is mostly factual information with a handful of my opinions. Sometimes some snap distribution arouses attention, I guess.

1 points
1
0
LLCHESTY's picture

January 15, 2024 at 02:18 pm

Reed played 66% of his snaps from the slot so they did move him around a bit. I think they'll expand where he lines up next year. I was a little surprised Musgrave only played 28% of his snaps in the slot.

https://www.playerprofiler.com/nfl/luke-musgrave/

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 15, 2024 at 10:24 am

There was a technical issue this time: I pulled the bejeezus out of something in or around my hamstring about 4 am. It was about an hour before I dared to sit at the computer again. [Don't ask what triggered the event since the answer makes me feel old - oh, all right - I stood up to get a cup of coffee. Okay now, thanks. It went away finally.]

Anyway, because I badly missed my deadline, I didn't make it a featured article which would push down the articles by other authors. I didn't do everything i usually do, either.

4 points
4
0
Guam's picture

January 15, 2024 at 11:07 am

I got a good chuckle out of that description TGR! Unfortunately I fully understand "old man" injuries.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2024 at 11:13 am

Glad it’s passed. Don’t hide your light under such bushels though. More value here than much that will follow! Keep up the great work. Watch that early morning hydration! Football injuries!

3 points
3
0
LLCHESTY's picture

January 15, 2024 at 02:13 pm

Don't feel old just from a hamstring pull, I've gotten bad hamstring cramps since I was in my 20s. Usually from a combo of hot outdoor work and unwise beer consumption but not always. Talk about feeling old, I needed help getting up from an MRI last week after just 25 minutes. Lower back issues have led to some terrible stiffness after any inactivity. Getting up in the morning is sometimes 2 or 3 minute process. The sciatic stuff has led to some seriously tight hamstrings. I probably need to stretch twice as long as I do and then some.

1 points
1
0
Guam's picture

January 15, 2024 at 08:28 am

I can forgive Kraft his holding call as that was as much on the RB as it was on Kraft. The play was designed to go left and Jones cut it back hard right which means all the blockers were on the wrong side of their defender. It is just too easy to grab and hold in that situation and Kraft got caught. As a long since "retired" high school offensive lineman, I used to hate it when our RBs would cut back against the grain of the play. I've gotten the same flag Kraft got yesterday and always blamed the RB....:)

I love the "next man up" philosophy of the Packer receiving group. From week to week it is almost never the same guy who has a big game. That has to drive DC's nuts! The Packers have multiple wideouts and TE's who can dominate a game and that is almost impossible to defend short of smothering the passing game at its source - the QB. I suspect SF is going to try to pour the pressure on Love since they can't cover all of the Packer receiving weapons.

Really good gameplan by LaFleur against Dallas. I hope he can create the magic again against SF, a team against which he has often been out-schemed.

3 points
3
0
LeotisHarris's picture

January 15, 2024 at 08:48 am

TGR, what do you make of Gary's snap count? I don't recall him being injured in any way during the game.

Thanks again for the great work here. Much appreciated.

4 points
4
0
T7Steve's picture

January 15, 2024 at 09:02 am

They were resting starters as much as possible and too early. It made the game look less lopsided than it was.

2 points
2
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2024 at 09:24 am

Steve,
To me Gary seems to have kinda' fallen off the last part of the season.
I'd like to think and hope that it could be a conditioning issue due to his missed time from the knee injury earlier in this year rather than the big contract getting into his head.

2 points
2
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 15, 2024 at 10:28 am

I don't know. Someone above wrote that enagbare got hurt which I am unaware of.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2024 at 11:14 am

I heard he was seen on crutches. I did not see it in game.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 19, 2024 at 07:48 am

ACL. Idk if it's torn or something else, but that's never good.

0 points
0
0
Doug_In_Sandpoint's picture

January 15, 2024 at 10:44 am

TGR, how did you think Clark did in coverage? I almost threw my Spotted Cow at the TV when we rushed 3 in the 1st quarter and dropped Clark. Of course Dak ran for a first down. If I never see a 3 man rush again it will be too soon.

3 points
3
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 15, 2024 at 11:00 am

I did notice that in real time. Sometimes the surprise works: I bet most here remember another NT getting a pick 6 in a playoff game years ago.

4 points
4
0