If they just want a field stretcher to replace Watson's ability to keep the D back up top, they can probably bring MVS back with Adams and they can have a reunion. That might risk AR wanting to show up with Lazard though.

I wouldn't be opposed to the idea at all. As stated, it wouldn't break the bank, the other receivers could learn from his example, and most importantly, he is still a reliable go-to receiver. Even with his last couple of teams he caught plenty of first downs and TDs, so having a receiver with his ability to get open and convert those third downs is something we could use. We would still need to draft a WR somewhat early, one with more speed, but signing Adams would help bridge the gap as the newly drafted receiver gains experience.

No. He left. We offered him good money to stay and he left.

While he was here, in his prime, he didn't make the difference in the playoffs. I don't see any reason to believe that he would now.

Draft a legit #1 WR at #23.

I never heard anything about Adams having a problem with the Packers front office. When he left, he said it was because Aaron Rodgers was not going to be around much longer, and he wanted to raise his family on the West Coast. Maybe there was some inside scoop that I missed, but even if there was, he has nothing but good things to say about the Packers now.

The answer is quick: no. Too much baggage along with age. The shadow of His Darkness would also hang once again over the team.

Adams was always a good team mate, made really no waves, great at his job, and be one hell of a mentor to our young receiver corp. Is all that enough to take another chance on him?

I'm sure Adams can be a factor for a true SB contender, but bringing him back to GB thinking he will be the key to raising the Packer's contending level is not sound thinking.
If bringing him back to move pass Driver on the list is even more pathetic thinking.
If Adams is in search of an SB ring, then he needs to look elsewhere, regardless of how much he is actually needed or expected to be used. Any demand of high dollar money/years negates that thinking, regardless if true or not.
If you're not moving on and forward, you're losing.
If you're going backwards into the past, you're losing.
The past should never be repeated, your goal is getting better than what was and had.
Love at this stage doesn't need the pressure to help Adams achieve a personal goal, and Adams isn't what the team needs to get Love to achieve the team goal of an SB win, or less than an SB appearance.
This is not meant to ignore the much-needed improvement of MLF, who has played a huge hand in the reasons of missed opportunities for better success.
If I was Adams, I'd look to Buffalo, PHI, Bal, KC, if a Ring is what's most important for a two-year deal.

Adams is a possession receiver now.
I'd like him to come back.
But- He's just too costly and limited now.

What was a strength of the packers a year ago.
Quickly changed with the drops.
If we don't have what we need. Draft it.

Adams has made his money and done his celebrity thing with his buds. It is time to move on to the next generation. If we want a good WR then draft a good one or two. Don't draft a raw athlete who you might be able to train up. Draft a savvy route runner who knows the craft. It is a young man's sport and these guys only sparkle for a short time then get expensive and injured.

I believe Adams price tag will be too high, especially if Gutey acquires proven FAs at OL, CB, or DL.

He would be a solid addition in tangible ways in addition to on field production. He overcame his "dropsies" early in his career and should be able to help teammates do it too.

He is still a quality receiver with a high work ethic and a leader.

He’d have to get rid of the Taco Bell in his house and get a Chili John’s.

It's so ridiculous to think about bringing Adams back. This sounds like an article from a 12 year old.

I like Adams and would welcome him back. But, let’s go get Hendrickson—go get’em Packers!
And…Bring on the draft.
Go Packers!!!

I would sign him him if it makes sense salary wise or another veteran WR. I would also invest a high pick in a WR. I thought last year it, at times, WR was the Packers' biggest weakness. We need WRs that consistently catch the ball!

My biggest concern is not about receivers. Sign one and draft one. My concern is with who’s throwing the ball to them. 2024 was not good for 10. Inaccurate and bad decisions. I want the guy to be good soooo bad.

Maybe their best bet - if Gutey wants to make one difference making signing - is to go more 'all in' on Josh Sweat. Sweat seems to make his DEs 'better' - and we need more production out of Gary/Van Ness. This would mean the Adams vs. Metcalf debate goes off the table as we couldn't afford both.

As there's not really another FA WR to stretch the field at under 10M, maybe it would be smartest to see if actually using a #1 pick on this type of WR in the draft makes sense.

I appreciate I'm in the minority here, but I don't have a problem keeping JA one more year (even if it's only 1/2 year of healthy top production) for the 7M in cap money 'lost' in releasing him...as you can't get anything for 7M at the CB position for his skill level (again, even if only for 1/2 year)

This 'package' would upgrade DL, keep CB at par (use a day 2 pick here to upgrade) and a #1 at WR would in theory upgrade that position.

You can't have everything, but this would be low risk in cap dollars and only a bit of risk at WR (using a #1)...but every #1 pick would carry the same risk as the risk from a #1 spent at WR...

I'm less certain 'sitting on your hands' and only nibbling in FA would improve the Pack progressing in the playoffs further. The TT approach to saving cap money to extend our own players after the 2025 season seems to be spinning the wheels and not improving. So...some type of calculated risk 'spash' needs to happen...