The Lass Word: It's Always All About Injuries
Next man up is easier said than done.
By KenLass

National Football League teams spend hundreds of millions of dollars on talent, coaching staffs, armies of scouts, and technology. The Green Bay Packers will employ no fewer than thirty coaches this year. Each one will spend countless hours this season breaking down video and formulating strategy. They will pore over analytics, trying to identify trends and percentages. They do this because any little edge they can find might make the difference between winning and losing. Winning games is the way they keep their jobs. The way they provide for their families.
And yet, despite all the hard work and finances invested, the fate of every team will almost certainly boil down to something over which they have little, if any, control. Injuries. How many players will get hurt, which players get hurt, how badly they get hurt, how many games will they miss. The answers to these questions will make the difference between a successful season and a disappointing one.
Which is maddening, especially since there is no definitive evidence that any particular practice or game strategy works better to avoid injuries, short of just holding players out. Even that is problematic. If you hold players out, they can’t improve. So you might as well play your guys, and let destiny play its hand.
The Saints, 49ers, Panthers, Patriots and Dolphins all dealt with the most massive injury issues in 2024. It’s no coincidence that all of them finished with losing records, falling short of expectations. According to the Sports Injury Control website, the healthiest teams in 2024 were the Ravens, Falcons, Vikings, Eagles and Broncos. All except the Falcons made the playoffs, the Vikings and Broncos far surpassed expectations, and the Eagles won the Super Bowl.
Last January the Packers lined up in a playoff game against the Eagles. They had to start the game without receiver Christian Watson and cornerback Jaire Alexander. Green Bay lost its best offensive lineman, Elgton Jenkins, on his first snap of the game. The loss was devastating. Travis Glover and Kadeem Telfort were disasters as replacements. Before the first quarter ended, defensive lineman Devonte Wyatt left the game with a leg injury. In the third quarter receivers Romeo Doubs and Jayden Reed both had to take a seat, Doubs with a concussion, and Reed with a shoulder problem. Remember, Christian Watson was already out, meaning the team had to go down the home stretch without its top three pass catchers.
Josh Jacobs had to carry the offense, and was on his way to a big day, having run for 81 yards and scoring the team’s only touchdown. But midway through the final period, Jacobs left the game with a leg injury. Before the contest came to a merciful end, center Josh Myers and linebacker Quay Walker had also limped off the field.
Would the outcome of the game have been different if all of those key players had remained healthy throughout? We can debate that. It would have been fun to find out. But one thing is for sure. Green Bay had no chance without them. Injuries basically decided the team’s fate.
It should be pointed out that injuries worked in Green Bay’s favor a few times as well. During the season they defeated a very good Houston Texans team that was missing five starters on defense, and their best receiver Nico Collins. They also had the fortune of playing, and beating, the Los Angeles Rams, who were without three O-line starters, plus receivers Puka Nacua and Cooper Kupp.
Coaches and players will always play down injuries. “Next man up!”, they will proclaim. That’s understandable. They can’t let themselves fall into the psychological trap of using injuries as an excuse. They must think positive. But let’s get real. The next man up is not as good as the player in front of him, otherwise he wouldn’t be the next man up.
Injuries don’t always take you down. It is possible to overcome them. The Packers won two games last season without Jordan Love. Granted, the victories came against the Titans and the Colts, two of the worst teams in the league, but Green Bay still deserves credit for redesigning the offense in a week’s time to empower back-up signal caller Malik Willis. Overcoming that kind of adversity, the loss of your starting quarterback, is rare.
I bring this up because injuries have been a major topic of conversation in training camp this week. We probably give them too much emphasis because we are starved for information about our team during this time of the year. Often coaches choose to hold players out of training camp workouts out of an abundance of caution, to ensure their readiness for the regular season. Many would play if the games counted. Yet it’s hard not to cringe at the laundry list of key players who are missing valuable training camp time, a list that includes Jordan Love, Jayden Reed, Dontayvion Wicks, Xavier McKinney, Nate Hobbs, Romeo Doubs and of course, Christian Watson. To this point, the injury gods have been reasonably benevolent. Of these critical starters, only Watson is confirmed not available to start week one, as expected. The Packers will need all the others to heal up quickly because the season starts with a bang as the Detroit Lions come to town.
We ruminate over which players are the best, which will break out, which will disappoint, the difficulty of the schedule, the competence of the coaches. We can make bold predictions and informed speculation. But you can’t predict injuries. To have a great season, you must be very good. And when it comes to injuries, you must be very lucky.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.
__________________________




Comments (33)
Savage57
August 15, 2025 at 06:01 am
Records of the injuries from various eras where practice and preseason games were wildly different from today's NFL probably don't exist, and if they do, who's going to take the time to scut through all the data to make a meaningful comparison?
But it would be interesting to be able to see if preseason processes from days past didn't produce 'hardened' players less susceptible to all of the pulls and tweaks players seem to incur today.
Or maybe it's just a case where every second of camp wasn't viewed through a microscope and what we perceive as different is just the absence of awareness.
WestCoastPackerBacker
August 15, 2025 at 11:43 am
I’d venture a guess that the intense workouts of this era are putting a lot of strain on the soft tissues and joints. Not clear why so many hamstring and groin injuries. But these guys are not under-trained.
dobber
August 15, 2025 at 01:01 pm
" Not clear why so many hamstring and groin injuries."
I would argue that it's more because simulating game conditions on your own when you're training is very difficult--you aren't stopping and starting, leaning on guys, bumping off guys and trying to regain balance and direction the same way. I've had it explained to me also that you can be extremely fit but still suffer muscle fatigue pulls and strains. But I agree, most of these players are hyper trained, twitched-up, powerful athletes. The days of needing camp to get players who spend their off-seasons driving trucks or cutting meat in shape are pretty much gone.
Cheezehead72
August 15, 2025 at 06:41 am
Not sure where Ken got his information from as to which teams had the most injuries but from what I see the Lions had the most in games lost and points lost due to injuries and they made the playoffs.
Injuries will happen in the NFL or any sport for that matter no matter what you do. So you have to depend on the next man up. The key in building a team under the salary cap is to build a competitive team that does not over extend on a few players so you can sign good players to be the next man up. In other words it is best to decrease the difference between the first and second string as much as possible to make the next man up work. This is one of the reasons I am happy the Packers do not go after those high priced impact players. If you use too much money on one or two high priced players you will have a harder time signing good players as backups.
stockholder
August 15, 2025 at 06:59 am
Love is a injury prone QB.
Moving on from the injuries, is
History lesson 101.
Lambeau field is not a museum.
TXCHEESE
August 15, 2025 at 08:13 am
Calling a player who has missed less than 3 games in 2 seasons injury prone is pathetic. Your man crush missed a significant number of games, through the years if I remember correctly. I don't thing anyone would call Rodger's injury prone.
stockholder
August 15, 2025 at 09:32 am
Back to Back?
I get you like waxed figures.
But 13 Ints in 2023.
and another 11 in a short 2024.
Isn't the connection for the play-offs.
Coldworld
August 15, 2025 at 09:58 am
Rodgers had 20 interceptions in his first 2 years as a starter. Love has 22. Rodgers had 11 interceptions in his 3rd year as a starter as well.
Mahomes had less than both, 17, but over the last 4 years has averaged 12.5 a year. No wonder the Chiefs have been such a disaster over that period and Mahomes is out of the league …
T7Steve
August 15, 2025 at 07:00 am
"The Green Bay Packers will employ no fewer than thirty coaches this year."
While there're 90 players in camp it sounds like each coach could take responsibility for 3 players regardless of position, less after cutdowns. No wonder there seems to be communication and responsibility issues.
In football I think there will be injuries. These 30+ coaches need to plan for "WHEN" not "IF" they occur. You plan for what your enemy can do not what you think he might do.
Cheezehead72
August 15, 2025 at 07:13 am
The Packers list 29 coaches on their website. Yes that is a lot and I agree there needs to be very good communication and coordination. To look at a ratio of coaches to players is a short sighted way of looking at the size of the staff being as each coach has different functions and responsibilities. Getting back at the communication and coordination needed is the reason that I have stated that I do not like MLF calling plays. The game has become so sophisticated that there needs to be one person in charge of the whole coaching staff. No head coach should also be a coordinator.
T7Steve
August 15, 2025 at 07:32 am
"short sighted"
How hard is it to have only THREE players under your wings and still be able to do your job? Only around TWO after cut downs. There would be nothing going on in those players heads that isn't accounted for, on or off the field. That's why I said, "regardless of position".
I agreed about MLF calling plays. Even Andy Reed is showing some wear and tear in his game decisions because of that, and he has a Hall of Fame QB to help with on field decisions.
NFLfan
August 15, 2025 at 07:49 am
@T7Steve-Kyle Shanahan is also showing wear and getting lots of criticism.
T7Steve
August 15, 2025 at 07:55 am
On a side note, did TGR say he wasn't going to do the practice roundups this week? I'm missing them. Maybe he's on vacation.
mnbadger
August 15, 2025 at 09:09 am
Remember that about half of the "coaches" have little or no oversight over players.
Video, scouting, travel coordination, strength training, equipment, etc eat up many of the 29 on staff.
Position coaches and coordinators are likely the only ones involved in technique.
I'd love to see mlf concentrate on the big picture and not on play calling.
He seems to lack a feel for the games once the ball is kicked off.
GPG!
dobber
August 15, 2025 at 01:04 pm
You beat me to this one, MN.
NFLfan
August 15, 2025 at 07:46 am
@CH72-Bravo. Let me reiterate that statement-'No HC should also be a coordinator'
LambeauPlain
August 15, 2025 at 08:30 am
I agree. I wish LaFleur had his head in the overall preparation, planning, execution and leading communications for O, D, and STs during the week...and during the game. Now during the week and on game day he is the OC and his head is micromanaging the offense, deep in the playbook.
How many Head Coaches with a Defensive or ST background call the defensive and ST plays? I don't know. My sense is few do.
LaFleur will not give up the gig as game day OC, though. He's very status quo.
Coldworld
August 15, 2025 at 09:00 am
LaFleur is supposedly best as an offensive mind. Why would one want to remove that? Do you really want Stenavich shaping the O? This contention makes no sense to me.
LambeauPlain
August 15, 2025 at 09:09 am
I would like a HC who's "best" is being a HC. So your contention is Stenavich is not an effective OC? That makes sense?
Coldworld
August 15, 2025 at 09:29 am
I suppose my contention is that if you are going to have an “offensive genius” as a HC then you need to capitalize on that. As to Stenavich, his play calling even if Vanilla, has never impressed in comparison to other coaches in prior preseason. Why would we want to put that in his hands and who takes over the bulk of the detail work if he’s planning game tactics?
I’m not arguing all HCs need to call plays. I’m very much stating that, in LaFleur’s case, and with his offensive coaching team, not doing so takes away his best attribute and poses more questions about his chosen supporting class of coaches. If LaFleur isn’t leading the O, what is he bringing to the table?
LambeauPlain
August 15, 2025 at 10:33 am
"What is he bringing to the table?" Apparently as the overall HC of the Packers, not very much? My belief is he could be very effective as overall HC leading up to and on game days. He is very bright. I note when he was "helping" Barry on D a few seasons ago, the D did improve.
And hey, CW....they now have Luke Getsy as Special Assistant and he called plays for the bares...oh yeah...never mind.
mnbadger
August 15, 2025 at 09:11 am
CW - No, I'd like mlf to specialize in his offensive talent as a coordinator.
He is not a good game day head coach.
GPG!
Bitternotsour
August 15, 2025 at 05:23 pm
Yeah. Since taking over in 2019, he’s led the Packers to five playoff appearances in six seasons. Including last year, he’s led the team to four seasons of 11-plus wins. With a 67-33 record, he’s 34 games over .500. That’s tied with Hall of Famer Hank Stram and ahead of Hall of Famers Bill Walsh and Marv Levy, among many others.
But sure, he totally sucks I can see how you'd think that. I can see that because I've read several of your posts and they're equally inane.
I think he's hovering around 12th ALL TIME in win percentage.
mnbadger
August 15, 2025 at 09:57 pm
You said he totally sucks.
I said I'd like him to either focus on offense as OC, or turn it over to a talented OC and manage the whole team better.
Especially on game day.
GPG!
stinkycheesehead
August 15, 2025 at 07:36 am
INJURYS ARE THE CULPERT, if you are fortunate enough to not have too many to key players and have capable backups, then you have a chance to excel and win the ultimate prize, do we have the (pack)age? that remains to be seen.
NFLfan
August 15, 2025 at 07:39 am
-GB has 30 coaches? Why not streamline by hiring the best positional coaches with proven excellent track records and let them hire their excellent assist coaching staffs? I bet it wouldn't add up to 30. And, it would streamline communication and accountability. Coaches such as Butkus, Stenavich, Mahaffey, Getsy, Hackett, Bisaccia are essentially dead-wood and are dragging the team. Perhaps these new excellent coaches would be current with injury-prevention techniques such as teaching better form, footwork as well as working with cutting edge training staffs? GB needs a major offensive coaching house-cleaning-won't happen with MLF @ the helm.
49ers were also dealing with 'hold-outs' such as Aiyuk and Trent Williams who missed important practices, were not 'football ready' and got injured. Might happen with Jenkins.
WestCoastPackerBacker
August 15, 2025 at 11:50 am
Jenkins has been back practicing for a couple of weeks now.
I’m wondering how you determined who is “dead wood” on your list. You do know GB was top 5 to top 10 in the various offensive rankings last season. And the D was top 3 in points allowed. How do you know they don’t already have some of the top positional coaches?
NFLfan
August 15, 2025 at 12:22 pm
@WCPB- I will share with you my process and it hasn't changed.
-Hackett has been fired by 2 teams. His ineptness was on full display on both the Jets and Broncos teams
-Getsy- He was also fired from other teams and was not picked up by anyone but the Packers MLF was heard yelling at him several days ago to put some effort into his coaching.
-Stenavich-He was a decent OL coach but his is not an authentic OC. He does not call plays nor does he manage the the offense well-there are many instances of lack of discipline, penalties, poor progress
-Butkus- His OL is often beset with numerous holding calls, poor footwork, overall lack of discipline.
-Bisaccia-has been paid 2Million and has not improved the ST's over a 4 year period. ST is ranked at the bottom of the NFL
-Mahaffey- I just look at the receivers and know they aren't be coached well-too many drops, poor route running. He had no experience prior to taking on that role.
I look at the results, primarily on Offense, and see stagnation and too many mistakes.
The Defense is coached well.
Vachio
August 15, 2025 at 08:17 am
That's where coaching makes the most difference. MLF has been both brilliant and not so much in that regard. His work with Willis was masterful. But there are many times in games where he doesn't seem to have a counterpunch or a plan B. I always coached my wrestlers to have a secondary move based on how an opponent is likely to defend against their primary move(s). Then work on a 3rd once you have the first two mastered. Football shouldn't be much different. This is how I want to attack this defense...what do I do if that gets taken away (either through injury or adjustment)? What do I do when the 2nd option gets taken away? It seems like a lot of football coaches struggle with that. I cringe every time I hear a coach complain about not having the right players to run his scheme. If you're saying that, you're not a real coach. A real coach should be able to build something around whatever players are available.
LambeauPlain
August 15, 2025 at 08:51 am
St. Vince had a whopping 6 assistant coaches. He didn't have an OC on the sidelines however. His OC was on the field. Both Bart and Zeke were adept at calling plays, situational football, reading the game flow and pulse of the game. If Vince felt he needed a certain play he would send out a sub player with the call...usually a WR or RB.
I do know many players played with and through injuries...some probably to great detriment. Concussion protocol? What concussion protocol?
Regarding injuries...is there data recording how many game week practices are missed players on a team, most especially starting players? I have the sense the Packers sit a lot of players during the practice, install game week. Their weekly injury report always seems very long. Many DNP and limited players. This has to impact the game day performance.
Packers have been a very conservative, cautious team dealing with even minor injuries. The Medical Staff is very careful.
T7Steve
August 15, 2025 at 09:00 am
Not only do they miss because of dings, but (my pet peeve) the dreaded "VET REST". These vested vets can probably get away with it, but I think the guys around them suffer.
Coldworld
August 15, 2025 at 09:13 am
It’s preseason. Almost any niggle is treated as an injury for established players. There is no reason to risk aggravation. At this point, none of the higher profile players were due to play this week anyway.
It’s different for those who have been out for a long time, especially the inexperienced and, obviously, for those fighting for roster and PS squad places. We are lucky this year, we have a competent number 2 QB in Willis.
It’s worth remembering that he did pretty well playing without familiarity with the WRs last year, albeit in a simplified O. Well the O is simplified in preseason anyway. Now the back up WRs get a chance to show with a good QB throwing to them. A blessing in disguise in some ways. Let’s see if any stake a claim to a PS spot. We may also get some comparatives when Elgersma and Clifford get in.
Interestingly yesterday, it was Heath and Brooks with the worst drops apparently, not the novices. However there appeared to be issues with route knowledge. Most of those haven’t played with the ones. Let’s hope yesterday was a crash course. Apparently Neyor again stood out.
It’s worth noting that the Colts have a lot of defenders injured too. Their OL lost their C and RG to the Vikings this off season and both their replacements were out. The back ups were inexperienced and visibly not ready and the OL was an uncoordinated mess.
That’s both reminiscent of our struggles in recent weeks and a reminder that lines need to get used to each other (not constantly switch out). It should probably temper the excitement about the amount of pressure we got somewhat, despite their quality tackles.
WestCoastPackerBacker
August 15, 2025 at 11:53 am
Would you rather dinged up players practice and risk exacerbating their injuries?