Which Players Might Be Under the Radar Trade Candidates This Summer?
Could these players be on the move before the start of the regular season?
By Dan Saia
Before the Green Bay Packers report to training camp in a matter of weeks, most of the conversation surrounding the roster has focused on which young players will earn the final spots on the 53-man roster. However, general manager Brian Gutekunst has never been afraid to make a late-summer trade if it strengthens the team or turns surplus depth into future draft capital.
Green Bay has done it before, acquiring offensive lineman Darian Kinnard and edge rusher Micah Parsons before the 2025 season and making other roster-shaping moves as injuries and depth charts around the league evolved. With another deep roster entering camp, there could once again be opportunities to move a player before final cuts.
While the obvious trade candidates such as Luke Musgrave have been discussed throughout the offseason, three under-the-radar names stand out as players who could quietly generate interest from other teams as we move throughout the summer.
Isaiah McDuffie
At first glance, Isaiah McDuffie doesn't seem like a logical trade candidate. He has become one of Green Bay's most reliable linebackers over the past several seasons, is well respected inside the locker room, and is a steady contributor on special teams. The problem isn't his ability—it's the depth chart.
The Packers enter training camp with Zaire Franklin and Edgerrin Cooper expected to lead the linebacker room. Former third-round pick Ty'Ron Hopper is entering an important third season and has shown flashes when his (limited) snaps have come, Nick Niemann and Kristian Welch have been brought back because of his value on special teams. That leaves McDuffie competing in a room that suddenly has much more depth than it did a year ago.
McDuffie would immediately appeal to linebacker-needy teams because he has proven he can start NFL games while also contributing heavily on special teams. He isn't a flashy player, but coaches value dependable veterans who rarely make mental mistakes.
Would Green Bay miss him?
Absolutely.
However, if the Packers believe Hopper is ready for a larger defensive role and Franklin gives them the veteran leadership they were seeking, Gutekunst could view McDuffie as a valuable asset capable of bringing back a Day 3 draft pick rather than potentially losing value later.
It might hurt the depth in the short term but if it can help Hopper develop it could be beneficial in the long run.
Darian Kinnard
Among these three players, Darian Kinnard may be the easiest to envision being traded.
The Packers have worked on developing their offensive line depth this offseason with the drafting of Burton and several undrafted free agent singees. Kinnard has proven to be a capable reserve who can play multiple positions and that type of versatility is hard to find in the late summer. He appeared in every game last season and even made several starts, showing enough versatility to be trusted whenever injuries struck.
The issue for him is that Green Bay's offensive line continues to get younger.
Jager Burton has quickly impressed coaches, while Jacob Monk, Donovan Jennings, and several other young linemen are competing for backup jobs. Kinnard remains valuable, but his experience may actually make him more attractive to another team than to Green Bay's long-term plans.
Offensive line injuries happen every August around the NFL. It only takes one contender to lose a starting tackle or swing lineman before the phone starts ringing.
Because Kinnard has starting experience and positional flexibility, he could easily become a player another organization targets late in training camp.
The Packers have consistently shown confidence in their ability to develop offensive linemen. If they believe Burton or another young blocker is ready for a bigger role, moving Kinnard for future draft compensation would fit Brian Gutekunst's roster-building philosophy.
Brenton Cox Jr.
Brenton Cox Jr. might be the most intriguing name on this list to another team.
The former undrafted free agent has flashed legitimate pass-rushing ability whenever he's been on the field. His production in limited opportunities has been encouraging, and few would question his natural talent.
The challenge has always been consistency and opportunity.
Green Bay's edge room why young and mostly unproven, has become increasingly crowded. Lukas Van Ness, Barryn Sorrell, rookie Dani Dennis-Sutton, Collin Oliver, and eventually Micah Parsons all factor into the rotation, leaving Cox fighting for defensive snaps despite possessing NFL-caliber talent.
Pass rushers are among the league's most valuable commodities, though, and there are always teams searching for rotational edge defenders who can get after the quarterback.
Cox has already shown he can produce when given opportunities, recording five career sacks despite playing a limited number of defensive snaps. That type of efficiency could intrigue teams looking for inexpensive pass-rushing help.
The biggest question is whether Green Bay values his upside more than any potential trade return.
If the Packers believe Dennis-Sutton and Oliver are ready to assume larger roles while Parsons eventually returns to full strength, Cox could become expendable despite his talent.
On the other hand, if injuries strike during camp—as they often do at edge rusher—the Packers may decide keeping proven depth is worth more than a late-round draft selection.
None of these players are likely to headline national trade rumors over the next several weeks. In fact, there's a very good chance all three remain in Green Bay when Week 1 arrives.
Still, Brian Gutekunst has built a reputation for maximizing roster value and taking advantage of depth when opportunities present themselves. The Packers have quality players at linebacker, offensive line, and edge rusher, and those just happen to be positions where injuries frequently create trade markets during training camp.
Isaiah McDuffie offers veteran leadership and starting experience. Darian Kinnard provides versatility across the offensive line. Brenton Cox Jr. brings pass-rushing upside that many teams covet.
If another franchise suffers injuries or becomes desperate for help before final roster cuts don't be surprised if one of these three under-the-radar Packers becomes the next player involved in a late-summer trade. It may not generate blockbuster headlines, but it could be exactly the type of calculated move that helps Green Bay both now and in the future.
-Dan Saia




Comments (11)
stockholder
July 02, 2026 at 10:52 am
You can't be serious,
Trade anyone. And you won't make the super-bowl
Reghamster
July 03, 2026 at 09:14 pm
So true anyone is our secret weapon. Well ask anyone!
Cheezehead72
July 02, 2026 at 10:57 am
If we are playing for a championship NFC or NFL why would we trade any of these players for a day three pick next year? Most people believe that day three picks are a crap shoot and even if you get a good one it takes at least a year for them to be of value to the team. That is two years before we get the return on the trade.
Most people believe that we lack depth at OL and edge and I think ILB too. So it would have to be a very good trade for me to agree with it. Yes I think that we will not get anything better than a 5th or possibly a late 4th for any of these guys. So I say hold pat and do not draw any cards.
Coldworld
July 02, 2026 at 12:27 pm
I hope Cox isn’t going anywhere! Of the remaining ones, McDuffie if they think Neiman or Hopper can play MIKE, but I think Hopper is the reserve Will, which is what his skills fit. They will want to keep Neiman as our best STer.
I think it’s not impossible we trade Brooks now we’ve got a group of penetrative DEs and may use LVN too on passing downs.
I could see Nixon getting traded if Cisse really takes off and St. Juste and or another looks good. It could be Valentine, but he’s younger, cheaper and not likely to be a problem off the bench. It’s unlikely but not inconceivable if our young corners & St Juste really have a good summer.
I doubt Kinnard goes anywhere, although I’d move him to G where he is better. For one thing he can play emergency RT and TE as well as G. He’s a good game day active candidate. I don’t see other backups being ready to do all of those supporting roles reliably.
The potential surplus appears to be at ILB and DE to me (assuming injury doesn’t intervene). I could see one at WR too. I’d hate to lose him for STs, but Melton is perhaps a possibility as a trade candidate, if not a probable one. Moore would probably have to be a dramatically better WR than he’s ever been to date and more physical and someone else would have to force their way on to the 53 (which I can see happening) while others show ST promise as a jammer and gunner.
barutanseijin
July 02, 2026 at 01:27 pm
“Under the radar trade candidate” = guys i want to see gone.
The problem is if you think so poorly of the guy, you should have no reason to expect anything of value in return.
dblbogey
July 02, 2026 at 01:58 pm
Gotta love thinking other teams will want to give up draft picks for our rejects.
WestCoastPackerBacker
July 02, 2026 at 02:39 pm
Every team needs depth, particularly if injuries hit in training camp. Like GB getting Kinnard for a 2027 6th round pick. If his current team didn’t think he’d be getting snaps, you trade him for a future pick that could net a player or be packaged to move up.
Zapato
July 02, 2026 at 04:55 pm
If the Packers get four compensatory picks next year, like all you beat writers claim, they'll have twelve picks in next year's draft. They'll also be pretty fat in the mid-rounds. So, I don't think we need more draft picks unless Gute's going to do some extensive "moving on up" during the draft.
So, what position would we want to trade for? I could maybe see getting another reliable cornerback or running back. But, those may be hard to come by. Maybe staying put is the better strategy.
Ya_tittle
July 03, 2026 at 12:24 am
Monk is trash.
There is an UFDA LB that I have read is a real gem. Can't recall the name right now but depth there is stronger than we realize.
HarryHodag
July 03, 2026 at 06:30 am
1)Why trade McDuffie while the team is under staffed at that position? For a late round pick?
2) Kinnard is too valuable. If Morgan is hurt or ineffective, Tom is likely to move to the left side with Kinnard at tackle. Or move Belton left and Kinnard to guard. He's more likely to be cut than traded.
3) Cox is a possible but if he's effective then we should keep him.
golfpacker61
July 03, 2026 at 07:16 pm
I agree Harry. That is a strange list of players to trade. All 3 are needed. Kinnard isn't a starter but he is a solid backup and our OL has been said to be weak. Our LB group is not much to write home about after Franklin & Cooper. The guys after McDuffie are basically JAGs & special teams guys. The LB room will get an upgrade in next years draft.
Cox is the biggest mistake on that list. He has more potential than LVN and with Parsons out, we don't need to trade 1 of the better Edges, we need to sign a FA for insurance.
It's surprising the writer didn't start with Musgrave, he has been mentioned the most and was almost traded last year before Kraft was hurt. He could easily be TE4 and not needed. Whyle has done more lately and Lachey is more well-rounded than Musgrave. Honestly, the UDFA guy can do what Musgrave does for less money.
Nixon has also been mentioned more than those other 3. As Coldworld said above, Cisse & St Juste could be better options than either Nixon or Vallentine. I don't think we are done yet @ CB. Watch who becomes available in Philly this summer. They are loaded and will cut/trade some good ones.