Browns 13 Packers 10 Game Balls & Lame Calls
The Packers snatch defeat from the jaws of victory
By Kalani Jones

In what feels like an annual tradition, the Packers fail to close the game out against a lesser opponent, and take an early season L that exposes the team's flaws in embarrassing fashion. Last year, the Packers were treated to a humiliating loss at the hands of the Minnesota Vikings, to the tune of a 3 interception game in Jordan Love's return from injury. In 2023, a debacle of a Monday Night Football game against the Las Vegas Raiders was a summation of Love's growing pains. 2022 was the Sauce Gardner Cheesehead game, a 27-10 fart that spelled doom for an anemic offense.
The list goes on and on.
2025's version might be the worst of them all.
The Packers rolled into the Dawg Pound riding high off a dream start to the season, featuring everything from a WAY too early mention of an undefeated season, to a couple of #1 spots on power rankings around the web. The team was favored by 7.5 points on the road, and looked ready to take advantage of a Browns offense that had been anemic to begin the season. And well... you already know the rest.
Is this the worst regular season loss of Matt LaFleur's tenure? I still maintain that title belongs to the season opener in 2021, when they were banished to the shadow realm 38-3 by Jameis Winston. Either way, there's little to be gained from this game but a healthy slice of humble pie.
I'm not here to cry Chicken Little. The sky is not falling, the 2025 season is not over, and the Packers are still Superbowl contenders. But my job here today is to hand out some superlatives for this game and this game only. And the story of this game is... not great.
Game Balls
The Defense
Through three quarters of this game, the Browns had only 123 yards of total offense, zero points and were seemingly in the process of being ground to dust beneath the boot of the Packers' defense. Then the fourth quarter happened, but I don't put the 13 points scored on them on the defense, necessarily.
The defense, especially the defensive line, dominated a Browns unit that was missing their two offensive tackles, and was even down to their third string right tackle. Rashan Gary's two sacks probably earn him an individual game ball (will he finally break ten sacks in a single season?), I thought LVN had a good game, same for Parsons and the secondary. A major takeaway from this game for everyone should be that this defense is a unit that can be relied upon, if the offense is struggling to find it's feet. They've allowed 18 points or fewer in the first three games of the season, a monumental feat.
Lame Calls
The Offensive Line
It starts here, unfortunately. Zach Tom and Aaron Banks were rushed back from injury too early, and will likely not be back until after the bye. Jordan Morgan had his worst game in the NFL, as he struggled to adjust to playing on the right side of the line (I'd question whether it was fair to put him in that position in the first place, considering that you have Belton and Kinnard in your back pocket), not to mention giving up the game - deciding blocked kick on special teams. Neither run blocking nor pass blocking was a positive for the Packers. Jordan Love was pressured on 13 of 31 dropbacks, for an unreal 42% pressure rate. Five sacks, more than double what the line gave up in the previous two weeks. A measly 2.6 YPC on the ground. The Browns deserve every ounce of credit they'll get for this game, as they are shaping up to be one of (if not the best defense in the league). But the offensive line depth was supposed to be a superpower of this Packers team, and instead they were a total liability.
Penalties
Fourteen penalties. FOURTEEN! That's seventy five yards given away for free off of them, and it's starting to feel like we can again consider the youngest team in the league to be the most undisciplined. On offense, you've got false starts, block in the backs, ineligible men down field, and holding. On defense, Micah Parsons had two offsides flags (including one that gave the Browns a five yard bonus to their game winning kick. Don't forget about Special Teams, including a completely unacceptable offsides, that would have given the Browns another crack at winning the game if the first kick hadn't gone through the uprights.
Penalties can represent a number of different issues for a team, but it's always a lack of something. Whether it's a lack of discipline, concentration, or positioning, the team needs to clean up the most basic fundamentals of their game. No team is getting far into the playoffs, let alone hoisting the Lombardi, playing with this level of self-handicap.
Fun Fact: This is the most penalties committed by the Packers in a single game since 2010.
Take Your Pick
Look, I could be here all day. You could pin the late interception on Jordan Love or Matt LaFleur, but it doesn't matter at the end of the day. Four years after signing the most expensive Special Teams Coordinator contract in the league, Rich Bisaccia's unit continues to come up short of the relatively low bar of league average. A lack of complimentary football meant that the defense was totally gassed by the time it came to stopping the Browns' game winning drive. Mental mistakes piled up, such as Xavier McKinney intercepting an arm punt from Joe Flacco, instead of awarding the team with better field position with a swat. We saw the first real impact of a lack of run-clogging DT, something myself and others were vocally worried about even before Kenny Clark was sent to Dallas (NOT to say you still don't make the trade, obviously). But the Browns' 5.1 yards per carry on offense provide a benchmark for other teams to follow, in order to beat this Packers team. Jaff Hafley will need to go back to the drawing board when it comes to protecting the interior defensive line players from a whole lot of good running games that Green Bay has on the schedule.
Three and Out
-- Here's the word of the week, and I don't think it's going to be a surprise to anyone: "Sloppy". Sloppy play. Sloppy execution. Sloppy discipline. Sloppy gameplan. For a team with the aspirations that Green Bay has, there's no reason for this sort of play to be put there. Obviously, we don't have access to the film rooms at 1265 Lombardi Ave. There's no all-22 footage of practice. The players and coaches need to bring their A game each and every week, and that's just not what happened.
-- In the NFL, you've got to learn how to win all sorts of games. Against the Lions and Commanders, the game was won with a quick start on offense that put the opposing teams on their back foot early. The Packers could tee off with their pass rush, allow the cornerbacks to play aggressive, and run an offensive game plan that was balanced. But on Sunday, the team was simply not ready for the "tortoise beats the hare" approach which saw the Browns eek out a win by the hand of Shelby Harris. The Packer's lack of protection on offensive line spelled doom from the beginning, and the offense just couldn't put together a semblance of a game plan in its stead. What we saw on Sunday was two of the best defenses in the league matched in an absolute mudfight, and the Packers didn't have the horses on the offensive line to play that game.
-- There's going to be a lot of discussion surrounding this game. It all feels so familiar, but what should also feel familiar is a bounce-back from these games. There's no reason for a general doom-and-gloom following this game, considering we are still in September, and the Packers still looked completely dominant against NFC powerhouses twice this season. No team is invulnerable. No team is perfect, and the Packers certainly aren't. This team is going to have to take its licks, figure out how to get back on its feet, and get ready for a very special matchup with the Cowboys in Jerryworld. As a wise man once said, "Lotta ballgame left".
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns!
__________________________




Comments (84)
mrtundra
September 22, 2025 at 07:39 am
Everything changed after the Love INT. The OL breaking down on the left side of the line happened twice.The first time, Love gets sacked.The second time the Browns block our FG attempt. McCarren saw it, after the first incident. Penalties up the wazoo--and 4 of them on Morgan, alone. Inexcusable! The D played really well, but no complementary football from our Offense. Get it together, and take it out on the Cowboys. GO PACK, GO!!!
norcaljoe
September 22, 2025 at 08:36 am
As for that Love INT, sadly, we've seen this movie before. But you're right, move on and whup the "Boyz.
Madrcat
September 22, 2025 at 04:35 pm
Everything changed way before the interception. Multiple 3rd and 1 passes that Love would not complete, or screwed up by false starts. Love ends the 3rd Qtr by screwing up another 3rd and one to get sacked for 13 yards as time ran out. Multiple Love passed that sailed over receivers and RB's heads. Then a low throw up the middle for an INT. How many RPO's did love actually hand off, instead of always wanting to be the hero and try to throw it? Too many! I agree with many others. Time to sit him down and start Willis at least for a half. Let the superstar rethink his worth, while rewarding Willis for passing on a $20 M offer to play elsewhere.
How many times over the last two years has the defense had a great game, only to have running backs take a pitch and run outside for big yards? This year it was our offense and MLF's play calling who didn't add those plays into our book. Cleveland gave him the edge on many plays, but he refused to roll out or pitch outside. Preferring used up trickery and jet sweeps instead.
Don't get me started on Special Teams. Once again, friendship is keeping poor talent on the Coaching staff. Fire him and take the long snapper with him.
TXCHEESE
September 22, 2025 at 07:48 am
Jordan Love? MLF? WTF? that is all.
mnbadger
September 22, 2025 at 09:32 am
MLF left nearly 3 minutes on the clock, starting around the 9.30 mark.
We threw 3! INCOMPLETE screen passes in run situations when all we should have been thinking about was draining the clock and taking care of the ball.
Plus the interception, with 3 players running routes in close proximity, while browns played tight coverage the entire game. What could go wrong?
Trade Fickell to the Packers for mlf. Very even trade, that both teams end up losers!
GPG!
PeteK
September 22, 2025 at 09:59 am
No problem with the screen pass calls as they represent a run by pass, Love was rattled and over threw 3 easy passes.
mnbadger
September 22, 2025 at 11:35 am
I agree that he was rattled. Don't put it on his shoulders.
Reminder, 3 of the 4 results of called pass plays are negative.
- incomplete, stopping the clock and no yardage
- interceptions - see Delpit, G.
- sacks - see Garrett, M and Harris, S. etc.
Also, as poorly as the oline was playing, penalties for holding, illegally downfield, missed assignments were also in play.
Offensive scheme and execution were horrid.
I hate saying it but Cleveland deserved to win this game, not us.
GPG!
dblbogey
September 22, 2025 at 12:23 pm
And Love threw very bad passes on all 3 of those screen passes. MLF didn't throw the bad passes, the stupid interception nor did he allow the kick to be blocked. Players get the credit win they win, they should get the blame when they lose.
jjbathgate66
September 22, 2025 at 01:08 pm
Oline was terrible, Morgan was not good, how many penalties can you have. They overlooked the Browns, they started to believe the hype, just show up not against this defense. Stinker
KenEllis
September 22, 2025 at 08:00 am
MLF extended Rich Bisaccia and made him the Assistant Head Coach this past January.
After Bisaccia's Special Team units sucked.
MLF had to be pushed to file Mo Drayton when he coordinated historically bad Special Teams and the 49ers blocked a FG and a PUnt (for a TD) when the D gave up just 6 points in the 2021 playoff loss.
When a head coach makes it clear he does not give a flying F about Special Teams believe him and expect continued outcomes like yesterday's in Cleveland.
jannesbjornson
September 22, 2025 at 08:38 am
Should have been moved when his guy, Anders Carlson was cut.
LambeauPlain
September 22, 2025 at 11:08 am
I believe Biscassia was named Assistant HC (what does he do in that role...teach blocking fundamentals?) two years ago after a lousy ST season and got a pay raise. Then LaFleur extended him in January for more money after another lousy ST season.
Matt grades his coaches really easy.
Who gets held accountable for the STs miscues that probably cost the game? Who gets held accountable when the entire OL sucked for 4 quarters? Horrible call and INT...but to get a FG winning kick blocked by incompetent blocking....SMH.
Defense had this game won after a bad day at the office from the O and STs...but the other 2 squads flushed the game.
CanPackFan
September 22, 2025 at 01:19 pm
MLF has no idea of how to hire ST coordinators! How many of us are sick and tired of Rich B? We cannot be a dominant team while Rich B is allowed to foul up games...
egbertsouse
September 22, 2025 at 08:04 am
They need to bench Morgan. I don’t care who they replace him with, someone from the practice squad, a FA signing, or the ball boy, just get him off the field. To allow him to start constitutes an acceptance of sloppy, don’t give a crap , sub-par play that can infect the entire team. MLF, hold somebody accountable just once.
10thArmored
September 22, 2025 at 10:22 am
We definitely don't have the luxury of benching him. What needs to be done is give him massive practice reps at LG to take the place of Banks who is already proving to be a health liability.
egbertsouse
September 22, 2025 at 11:18 am
Maybe they can just replace him with a turnstile, it blocks just as well and won't get a false start.
canadapacker
September 22, 2025 at 08:11 am
Total arrogant team loss. Lack of focus by all including the coaching staff. QB thought he was the best and going to the superbowl and not playing well. Special teams co-ordinator needs to be fired this week. Examples of Love's bad play include not making easy dump offs, the bad slide when he could have had the first down ( I mean technique in sliding looks good but dont start it early ), INT of course and too many times standing in the pocket holding the ball . Defense played well except near the end but I thought and the commentators said that the Interference calls were weak. Special teams - holding on every kick and cant block on the field goal - Com on man.
The O line issues need to be fixed and can be fixed by play design- we have enough talent both with the QB running and the other fast guys to not just to accept our running backs to keep hitting a solid wall of defensive players. Take this game and dump it into the NOT HOW TO PLAY dumpster.
And I am serious - fire the Special teams co-ordinator -
Stickfish
September 22, 2025 at 09:00 am
Can’t see it much different. What was it, like three TOs used as the play clock ran down? How many pre-snap penalties? To me those all speak to the same symptom and that is leadership and accountability, or lack thereof.
Defense resorting to hugging the opponent down instead of hit and wrap yields the 4th Q drive by Cleveland.
The Bucs just found a way to win with 2 starters on the OL and down multiple other starters.
Figure it out please MLF, a fish smells from the head back.
<><
Aldo
September 22, 2025 at 05:43 pm
Yep, giving Love the money they did was like pouring sand down a rat hole. The guy is average, at best. He is too often inaccurate and inspirational. He shows no emotion, certainly not a leader. I can't wait until he is history.
T7Steve
September 22, 2025 at 08:12 am
I thought about this when I saw the replay the first time, "Mental mistakes piled up, such as Xavier McKinney intercepting an arm punt". You're the first I've seen mention it. I think that interceptions were kind of slim for him this season, so he wanted to start stacking some stats. The only excuse for it would be if he could see a good path for a pick 6, but that usually doesn't happen when it's in the middle of the field.
RCPackerFan
September 22, 2025 at 08:24 am
I view this game as a humbling experience. We saw R Walker talking about how this team could go undefeated. And there has been so much hype around this team. Well, time to get out of the clouds and get back in the trenches. Because that is where these games are played. And that is where we lost the game. Make no mistake about it. We lost this game because of us.
Game Balls:
Gary -
He deserves a game ball. He had 2 sacks in the game. He has been really damn good.
Bullard -
He has really taking a 2nd year leap. He has looked great early in the season. Unfortunately he got hurt in the game. (I believe concussion?)
Defense -
The defense overall played a great game. They allowed 1 true scoring drive. The love interception gave Cleveland the ball at the 4. A bad DPI call put the ball at the 1. The blocked FG gave the Browns the ball at the 47. They only had to move roughly 10 yards to be in FG range. These are the Browns stats.
Flacco was 21-36 for 142 yards and 1 INT.
Judkins ran the ball 18 times for 94 yards 5.2 average and 1 TD. He had that one long run. Take away that 1 run (which you can't do), and he was 17-56 for and average of 3.3. That one run changed the outlook of the whole game they played.
Lame Calls:
OL -
It doesn't help that Tom lasted 1 play before he had to go out. It doesn't help that Banks has been injured more then he has played for us this year. It doesn't help that Rasheed Walkers facemask broke on a drive. But they opened up 0 holes in the run game. They were not good pass blocking.
Love -
It wasn't all horrible for him. The OL was horrible. But he gets a Lame call for 2 reasons. First the interception. Some want to blame the LaFleur for a bad play call. They should have ran it.. Is all I have heard this morning. It was 3rd and 3. Had they ran it and not gotten it, they would have called him conservative. They would have called him afraid to win the game.. He is in a lose lose situation. Love has the ball, he threw it, and it went right to a defender. That is on him.
The other bad decision was snapping the ball at the end of the 3rd Quarter. They had no reason to snap it. Think about this. Had they waited till the 4th quarter to snap the ball the Browns wouldn't have had enough time at the end of the 4th to spot the ball. No clue why they snapped it. Also, him taking a sack on that play. It was 3rd and 1 and he was sacked for 11 yards.
Special Teams -
They were not special in the way you want them to be special. Allowing a FG to be blocked. I'm sure there is a trickle down effect on injuries, but you have to be allowed a 43 yard FG to not get blocked.
Penalties -
2nd drive-
They have 3rd and 4 at the 16 yard line. Morgan has a false start to make it 3rd and 9. They don't convert and settle for a FG.
3rd drive-
They have a false start on 2nd and 1 that they overcame. Then later they have they have the ball at the 38 yard line. False start on 1st down. Gain 5 yards to make it 2nd and 10. Then Love was sacked for 5 yards. Its 3rd and 15 at the 43 and an illegal block puts them back another 7 yards. #rd and 22 and Love is sacked again. They were at the 38 and lost 20 yards.
4th drive-
3rd and 1, false start to make it 3rd and 6. Love is sacked on the next play.
Last drive-
Packers have the ball at the 22. Walker has a false start and lose 5 yards. 2 plays later the kick is blocked.
Three and Out:
"Sloppy". Sloppy play. Sloppy execution. Sloppy discipline. Sloppy gameplan."
This game was sloppy. But I don't blame the game plans. There is no game plan that tells the OL to commit 5 or whatever false start penalties. There is no game plan that has 2 of your starting 5 OL getting hurt. They tried about everything offensively and couldn't really do much. The one
"In the NFL, you've got to learn how to win all sorts of games. "
They have to learn how to win games. Every year is a new team. Each team needs to learn how to win and how not to lose together. If they can take this loss and learn from it, and improve, that is a good thing. Sometimes you need a bad loss to create a good team.
"There's going to be a lot of discussion surrounding this game. It all feels so familiar, but what should also feel familiar is a bounce-back from these games. There's no reason for a general doom-and-gloom following this game"
If there is any doom and gloom it is that person persona to be a doom and gloomer. This is the 3rd game. This is against a team we don't normally play, and they have a good defense.
Cheezehead72
September 22, 2025 at 12:37 pm
Thanks for reminding me about the play right before the end of the 3rd quarter. I was surprised they ran that play too. All I can think is Love thought he saw something in the defense that made him think he could get the first down. He was wrong. They should have let the time run out and come up with a good plan.
This would also be on MLF as all he had to do was keep them on the sidelines. Do not put your QB in that situation unless he is Tom Brady and can say nope I do not like it. Most QBs think they are Superman and will make it work.
dobber
September 22, 2025 at 08:27 am
The Packers looked like a team that had been reading its press clippings. Cleveland looked like a team that needed a win. We'll see what happens next week--Dallas's defense looks really, really bad, and they're dinged up. They've shown that they can't cover downfield and they couldn't get to Caleb Williams yesterday with his middling-to-poor OL. Their offense is going to move the ball and score points (and make some costly mistakes), but this is a conference game the Packers need to go on the road and win.
Losing to Cleveland on the road in September isn't the end of the world, but they have to bounce back in a conference game next week against Dallas playing two reserve OL. That's not an ideal spot.
" Zach Tom and Aaron Banks were rushed back from injury too early, and will likely not be back until after the bye."
They need those two guys back and they need to be healthy...especially Tom. Anyone who has had core injuries knows exactly how hard they are to manage and how easy they are to aggravate. The OL depth was a question, anyway, and any team that needs to lean very far into their reserves is going to have issues.
"Penalties"
There was a little home-cooking for Cleveland going on, but many of those penalties were legit. It was getting to the point later in that game where there were flags on just about every snap, and the late goal line possession for the Browns was atrocious. After only 4 penalties v. Detroit week 1, the Packers have taken 24 accepted penalties in the last two games. That can't continue.
T7Steve
September 22, 2025 at 09:07 am
You tend to get more penalties when you're struggling on the O-line.
What happened? They had to use backups against a very good veteran Washington D last week and then had a mini bye.
RCPackerFan
September 22, 2025 at 09:29 am
"There was a little home-cooking for Cleveland going on, but many of those penalties were legit."
I didn't really agree with a few of the DPI penalties they got. But to me the biggest problem with the penalties were all the presnap stuff. 5ish false starts. 1 is too many because its all mental.
EricTorkelson
September 22, 2025 at 10:13 am
100 percent Dobber ... Z Tom was obviously not ready (whatever happened to strength tests) To compound that the Packers threw in Morgan who has only been playing on the left side instead of Belton? I'm not going to blame Morgan he looked unprepared and not comfortable in his new role this is 100 percent on a bad coach's decision.
The bottom line in the NFL if you can pressure the opposing QB with four DLs and Cleveland did (Loves horrific int) you don't need much of an offence to win and they don't...
Razer
September 22, 2025 at 08:31 am
"The Packers snatch defeat from the jaws of victory"
Perfect headline for this game. As much as the Browns clawed for this win, the Packers did their best to give it away, particularly in the 4th quarter. Good teams find a way to win NOT a way to lose. A lot of blame goes on the players for poor discipline and a failure to execute. But, if it is the goal to put your players in a position to succeed, then perhaps some second half adjustments to the poor pre game plan might have helped.
PeteK
September 22, 2025 at 10:15 am
Absolutely, you don't try to thread the needle to a receiver towards the end of the 4th quarter while leading! Also, the penalty that stopped the clock before our FG miss would have at least put the game into overtime. I'm worried that's two very makable FG misses in two wks. The block was on McManus as the kick was very low.
Cheezehead72
September 22, 2025 at 08:50 am
I am on track for my season prediction. I had them at 2-1 right now. Yes I got the last two week wrong. This team showed us they are just above average and that a 10 win season is the most I expect.
STs are terrible. MLF has shown us that he should not be the HC and play caller. I will agree that you do need to run up the middle even though that is the strength of the Browns defense but way too many up the middle calls. The offense is average at best. There is not depth to the OL. Love throwing the INT was unacceptable but then he could not hit Jacobs in the flat which was working. He missed on 4 passes to the flat. He has always had problems throwing to the flat. I believe it is that he does not set his feet properly before the throws.
The defense for the most part looked very good and held them. There is no excuse for a player that gets paid the most of any non QB player to be offsides and especially lining up offsides. Oh and he was out of position on many plays.
Joster11
September 22, 2025 at 08:54 am
The good--I live in Alabama, so I didn't have to watch this nightmare.
The bad--Lafleur's "Why me?" face instead of practical in-game management when Plan A doesn't work.
The ugly--$2 million for a not-so-special-teams coach.
Packers0808
September 22, 2025 at 09:13 am
What I don't get why Morgan, because high draft have to play him. When you have Kinnard on the bench you lack guts to bench a high rounder.
NFLfan
September 22, 2025 at 09:24 am
Packers will look back in the cold of winter and realize they threw this game away.
MLF refuses to hire an authentic Offensive (not Stenavich) mind and he ignores Special Teams. He seems like a 'nice' guy but he puts his comfort first by continuing make the same mistakes, retains bad coaches and does not seem to report to anyone-this is where not having an owner becomes a problem.
jvole
September 22, 2025 at 09:37 am
I'm not commenting on Bissacia again BUT one of MLFs biggest Achilles is he holds onto bad coaches too long. Joe Barry, Moe Drayton, etc.
And I wish he would quit with the "that's on me" BS. Its on you AND Jordan. Stop pretending to be some martyr when everyone knows there is shared blame. He should say "it's a team game, and there is blame shared by coaches and players". Stop trying to protect the sensitive egos of these guys. Makes him look ridiculous. I wonder what the players think when he says stuff like that?
Razer
September 22, 2025 at 10:01 am
Totally agree with both these points. Not surprised the field goal was blocked, disappointed that we couldn't put a fork in the Browns at any point in the 4th. Protection on field goals has been iffy for years. It has never been rectified. And yes, Love has to own that int even if it was a poor play selection from the coach. I have never been a fan of HC and play caller wrapped into one. Matt doesn't do a good enough job at either task and it hurts the team. But who is going to tell him?!
jvole
September 22, 2025 at 02:48 pm
Good points....I think Bisaccia also has the role of 'game time co-manager' or some thing. IDK, seems like he is failing on that front as well.
I would also be nice to go a game where the ST unit that plays 10% of the snaps does not end up with 30% of the freaking penalties.
PatrickGB
September 22, 2025 at 10:00 am
Good, that’s out of the way. Now back to winning football.
J-Rome
September 22, 2025 at 10:15 am
After the first series of this game I had a really bad feeling about it. It had a bad vibe from the beginning. The offensive strategy seemed to be conservative because the line was playing awful. It seemed like they were waiting for the Browns to make a mistake they could take advantage of. Instead, the Packers made the mistakes. On the interception, it seemed like Love was throwing to Kraft no matter what, and it burned us. We have great specialists on special teams but the rest of the operation is highly questionable. The dumb penalties were both a lack of focus, and some questionable calls. It all added up to a bad loss.
dobber
September 22, 2025 at 10:31 am
"On the interception, it seemed like Love was throwing to Kraft no matter what, and it burned us."
He threw underneath to Wicks, and Delpit squatted on that route rather than carrying Kraft downfield. If he goes down the seam to Kraft who just ran through that area and the S was struggling to get to, that's a potential big-gainer.
J-Rome
September 22, 2025 at 10:44 am
OK thanks that makes more sense. I thought the play by play guys said he was throwing to Kraft so I went with that. I didn't see Kraft near where the ball was thrown so I was thinking it was just that bad of a pass.
dobber
September 22, 2025 at 01:18 pm
Well, it doesn't change the fact that Wicks was surrounded by 3 defenders...
harleycops
September 22, 2025 at 10:17 am
Game balls: PackerNation who traveled 9 hrs/570 miles to Cleveland to watch this fiasco
Lame balls: Packer players who boasted of a perfect season and now eat crow sirloin every dinner this week
No balls: Packer team who loses to an 0-2 team qb'd by senior citizen Flacco and figures 14 penalties is a great game plan to beat him
10thArmored
September 22, 2025 at 10:26 am
All I can ask is what would Vince be doing if his team sustained 14 penalties?
PeteK
September 22, 2025 at 10:31 am
I just thought about that pass to Golden towards the end of the game when it looked like he was going to take it all the way, but couldn't stay in bounds even though he had plenty of space. However, remembered later that he must still have a lingering ankle injury that hampered him early in the season. Feel like I fell off a very high cliff.
GregC
September 22, 2025 at 10:31 am
The Browns defense sure looked legit. It quickly became apparent that this was not going to be a blowout win, so I figured this would be a chance for the team to show that it could grind out a win by keeping mistakes to a minimum. Well, so much for that.
Snapping the ball unnecessarily at the end of the third quarter was a really bad sign. It should not have even been an option for Love to do that. The interception was completely baffling as well, though I read that the defender fell off his coverage and stepped in front of it, which happens sometimes. The announcers were clueless throughout the game and did not explain it.
I thought Jordan Love actually played very well except for those two huge mistakes. I know he overthrew a couple of checkdowns, but he had pressure in his face all day, and those touch passes can be tricky when a QB is under duress.
Special teams lost the game, plain and simple, after the offense showed resilience by getting into field goal position.
My only beef with Jeff Hafley last season was when he threw away the last game against the Bears by allowing them to complete a medium-length pass to get into field goal range and spike the ball to stop the clock. I figured he would learn from that mistake. But the same thing happened again in this game.
Razer
September 22, 2025 at 10:59 am
"Snapping the ball unnecessarily at the end of the third quarter was a really bad sign"
Thought the same myself. I think Lafleur relies too much on trickery rather solid, fundamental football. But from this play on I sensed that the Packers were giving the game away thru mistakes and poor execution. Hard to watch
EricTorkelson
September 22, 2025 at 12:36 pm
GregC... Love played very well? maybe but he crumbled huge under pressure, it started when he foolishly took a sack instead of throwing the ball away when he was outside the hashmarks. (Where is his focus). Now overthrowing 2 checkdowns... he had good looks at both of them pressure or not, terrible throws. (What happened to Confidence?) Interception, Love flagged that throw if you watch the replay no less than two browns watched Loves eyes and undercut that throw it was low and uncatchable anyway for the Packer.
Finally, when Love is mentally having issues why is he walking around by himself or sitting by himself on the sidelines... where are the coaches or backup quarterbacks armed with tablets going over plays and strategy's attempting to get Loves head back into the game?
Alberta_Packer
September 22, 2025 at 11:05 am
So it's appears unanimous that MLF and Love are awarded a lame ball. I'll join in but largely for the reason on how LaFleur was unable or unwilling to adjust to the Browns D-plan. It was apparent - quite early - that Love was often being overwhelmed by Browns D. I thought that a sound tactical move would have been to bring in Willis for some reps. At the very least it might have slowed down the Browns rush D - given his running abilities. Plus he has proven that he can throw a good pass. Which brings me to another point - the coddling of Jordan Love.
In other professional sports - top players such as goalies and pitchers are regularly pulled if they're having a rough game. Love was having a rough game and should have been pulled - in whole or in part - to see if Willis was a better option on the day. If not - fine - but at least try to make a meaningful adjustment and counter-move. Of course this did not happen as LaFleur was thoroughly out-coached - from the very beginning of the game right up to the final whistle.
As to Love - I believe that being pulled in favor of Willis could have been an important developmental moment for him. That a little tough love from LaFleur could result in a little mentally tougher Love for future games. Because up to now - always sheltering Love appears to be more hindering than helping.
Green Bay Shareholder
September 22, 2025 at 11:42 am
100% - well stated !
GregC
September 22, 2025 at 11:54 am
I thought Love actually played very well except for the interception. He was constantly under pressure. Most QBs would've been sacked more than he was in that game. He is not being coddled. Switching between two QBs is something you see in college football sometimes, but almost never in the pros. It would most likely create more problems than it would solve.
Alberta_Packer
September 22, 2025 at 12:24 pm
I'll just add taking a 13 yd. sack - when he should have thrown the ball away - on his bad play list.
I don't think that Love was the main reason why the Packers lost - as I list the greater problems being O-line, STs and LaFleur coaching.
Yes Love was under constant pressure - which reinforces my argument that a more mobile Willis should have been brought in on a situational / occasional basis.
Trades in the NFL almost never happened - until it did. Same with the tush push. So thinking the same for switching QBs. Especially with a proven backup with complementary abilities.
13TimeChamps
September 22, 2025 at 12:25 pm
I agree. I can't think of one example of an NFL team being successful switching between QBs during games. The offense gets used to their QBs cadence and rhythm, especially the OLine. I think this would lead to more confusion than anything else.
I also agree that, considering the constant pressure that Love was under, he played reasonably well. Obviously, you'd love to have the INT back. It happens to every QB. That was Love's first INT of the season, by the way.
My biggest takeaway from the game was the struggles from the Oline. Injuries certainly played a part there, but the pre-snap penalties absolutely need to get cleaned up.
Alberta_Packer
September 22, 2025 at 12:28 pm
How many teams have a Malik Willis as their second QB?
Packerpasty
September 22, 2025 at 11:20 am
MLF and once again his inability to make any sort of adjustment, Love who continues to make really dumb mistakes, taking sacks, sliding too early when everyone knows Packers are horrible at 3rd and short, just too many boneheaded plays by a very well paid QB.....dumbest play of the day...end of third quarter trickery where they lost 11 yards (throw the damn ball away at least).....
LambeauPlain
September 22, 2025 at 11:29 am
LaFleur had 10 days to prepare for the Browns.
What did he not know about the Browns D that surprised him? Many here were concerned about the OL going into season... getting the best 5 identified and playing as a unit. He and his O coaches are still trying to figure out who the best at each OL spot and the best overall 5. It showed just how the OL is the soft under-belly of the Packers now. Even Jenks sucked. Who's coaching the OL up?
Bicassia had 10 days to prepare for the Browns.
What did he do to improve blocking assignments and techniques for the FB unit? They showed signs of leaking during the first two games. Now Mr. Automatic McManus is suddenly very ordinary and bringing up memories of Rich's Carlson folly.
Hafley had 10 days to prepare for the Browns.
His men did what they had to do for the win.
At least this incompetence from the O and STs came against an AFC opponent.
EricTorkelson
September 22, 2025 at 12:46 pm
Lambeau... it started when an injured Z Tom was giving the start for one play and replaced by Morgan who had been only playing left guard and left tackle previously instead of Belton who had played well at right tackle in previous game (dumb)
LambeauPlain
September 22, 2025 at 04:50 pm
I don't understand it. After Tom went down, did LaFleur make the decision to play Morgan after zero game snap experience at RT...even in college? Or did Matt delegate that to Stenovich? Butkus?
I thought Belton is...or was the RT backup. I could even understand Kinnard. He played OK at RT. Why experiment during a game with one of the best fronts in the NFL?
Flipping from one side to the other in the NFL is not so easy, as Josh Sitton so graphically described as changing the hand that holds the Charmin. And why a player that has ZERO game experience playing RT?
Alberta_Packer
September 22, 2025 at 05:58 pm
First - it was irresponsible to start Tom at all - when it was apparent that just before the Browns game he was struggling with forward movement. So LaFleur decided to send a physically compromised Tom to face Myles Garrett ! Just unbelievable. Especially when Tom re-injured himself after just one snap.
LaFleur's second dubious decision was to play Morgan at RT - which he rarely has played. With Morgan out of position - against a stout Browns D-line - the end result was inevitable.
If I was Ed Policy - I'd start to put together a long list of head coaching candidates for next season.
WD
September 22, 2025 at 11:34 am
One horrible missed block on special teams field goal cost us the game. The defender went right through 85 like he wasn't even there. I suggest we get someone who can at least attempt to block the guy on the edge. Even a slight delay on the defender and we would have won. In all honesty.... a pathetic loss from that one play from special teams. The question is what are they going to do about it? Just when you thought our special teams were no longer a problem. ....This.
Leatherhead
September 22, 2025 at 11:42 am
No. The offense played poorly all day and only put up 10 points. 10 points RARELY is enough to win in the NFL. Had they scored 27, like the two previous weeks, one bad play on special teams doesn't change anything. Or even if they'd scored 14 points, which is almost never enough to win, the blocked FG wouldn't have meant the game.
Special teams consists of the bottom of your roster. Your offensive starters are at the top of the roster....QB, RB, WR, etc. Those are the guys that should be determining the game, not a bunch of rookies, and UDFAs that you typically find on special teams.
This is the nature of special teams. It's why they're going to make mistakes. More than one kick got blocked yesterday. It happens. If you don't want it to happen, don't kick FGs.
10thArmored
September 22, 2025 at 01:44 pm
It looked to me too like it was the edge guy who blocked it but it was actually a DT in the middle who got his hand on it. Either way it was shit blocking and/or McManus didn't lift the ball enough.
Green Bay Shareholder
September 22, 2025 at 11:39 am
How many years does it take to get an excessive amount of penalties "Cleaned Up" or to adjust to a quick passing game when the Oline apparently is overwhelmed or under manned - especially not naming names but a former 1st round draft pick that was imploding in front of our eyes. Coaching adjustments with play calling - just sayin' - maybe, just try and see if it works ? Would be wonderful to see the team bounce back like the Lions did after we beat them, not sure if we have that kind of coach though. Fingers crossed that the Browns game was a teaching moment.
Leatherhead
September 22, 2025 at 11:50 am
Across the league,from what I've been able to see, it seems like officials are really asserting themselves. Even the guys in the booth are saying "Well, I don't know about that...." when they look at the replays. There's nothing worse, IMO,than when officials start to act like they're a part of the game instead of being mostly invisible. The people don't pay to watch the officials.
You can call any play that you want to, but if guys aren't getting blocked, it isn't going to matter. That's the fundamental problem right now....not play calling. That's all we need to get cleaned up. We'll be fine if we can do that.
Of the two road games before the break, better to lose to Cleveland and beat Dallas. We win next week, and we'll be 3-1, we'll take a break, and we'll be ready for the midseason.
canadapacker
September 22, 2025 at 12:04 pm
And the big thing is how much money is being won or lost sometimes due to a call that changes the game. Like the movement on the tush push - what happens if early movement is called and the next down is from the 6 and they dont convert - Big bucks to someone.
GregC
September 22, 2025 at 11:59 am
I think they DID adjust to the quick passing game. Sure looked like it to me. They still threw some passes downfield, but not as many as usual. If your O-line is not getting people blocked, it's going to be a rough day no matter what plays you call.
canadapacker
September 22, 2025 at 01:30 pm
He cant just sit there - they had success when he rolled out . Especially against the motion - and all he needs to do is make one guy miss if they leave a guy there. They did not use his strength. And a couple of times he just played it too safe - ie ran out of bounds when he could have gained extra yards. The game plan was arrogant - and they never really adapted.
JohnnyLogan
September 22, 2025 at 12:11 pm
I haven't seen an article yet willing to discuss whether Le Fleur should be replaced. Six or seven years in, and we're still faced with the same deer-in-the-headlights look on Le Fleur's face every time he screws up another game—horrible ST, an undisciplined team that commits too many penalties, and an uninspired offense. Nothing has changed. This team is loaded with talent, but seems stuck with a coach, a QB, and an offensive scheme that aren't NFL-caliber for a Super Bowl contender. All the talk about our great depth at receiver, a #1 pick WR, and a top-five RB, and yet even in the two previous wins, the offense was not fun to watch, with far too many three-and-outs.
I've been ready for Le Fleur to get the axe for a couple of years now. I'd love him to be gone before this year is pissed away, but that's not going to happen. We'll likely make the playoffs, but who has confidence that Le Fleur can coach us past the first round? Policy, who has watched Le Fleur's brain farts in close games before, could decide to change horses in mid-stream, but why wait? Change before we hit the stream. I'd love to see a bold move and replace him now, although the odds are overwhelmingly against that happening.
What is the consensus here as to whether Le Fleur should be gone now or later, or not at all?
jannesbjornson
September 22, 2025 at 01:03 pm
He's not the guy to bring home the Trophy.
CanPackFan
September 22, 2025 at 01:27 pm
Hafley is sitting in the wings. I'd make him HC in a heartbeat. Find a new OC - Steno is an OC in title only - and we're off to the races!
Packerpasty
September 22, 2025 at 07:13 pm
id make this his last "make it or break it" year...he should be an OC somewhere or at least hire a good one for the Packers to help him...his ego wouldn't allow that I'm sure...smartest guy in the room..
Snap the ball
September 22, 2025 at 12:13 pm
It’s one game. First road trip.
They play scared on offense
The Defense didn’t.
EricTorkelson
September 22, 2025 at 05:41 pm
Except the last play Snap that Cleveland executed before the game winning field goal, Evans was playing seven yards off the slot receiver with 12 seconds left ... it was an easy quick toss and a gain of ten and field goal range ( like taking candy away from a Packer )
gsd3
September 22, 2025 at 12:15 pm
Need to look for a center and move Jenkins back to LG.
Snap the ball
September 22, 2025 at 12:18 pm
I think Josh Jacob’s needs to take over of leadership on the Offense and Jenkins….
dblbogey
September 22, 2025 at 12:26 pm
Why start Morgan at RT when he's never played the position and you had Belton available who held up well the previous week? Especially when Morgan hasn't really impressed at any position. I suppose it's because they wasted another 1st round pick but aren't ready to admit the mistake.
CanPackFan
September 22, 2025 at 01:13 pm
The advertised Oline depth is a myth. Love still makes stupid decisions after all this time. LaFleur is a consistently inconsistent play caller and in game coach. Sts are an absolute joke outside of the 2 kickers. Fire Rich B immediately!
EskyBrian
September 22, 2025 at 01:45 pm
This article NAILS it. Wake up MLF. Coach your GUYS.
THESZOTMAN1
September 22, 2025 at 02:33 pm
Where's the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly?
Here are mine anyway.
The Good ; D-fense overall + Golden (Shifty) + Heath, Doubs, and Kraft (until FG)
The Bad: Offense overall; O-line in particular. Couldn't run block, which took Jacobs out of game, or pass block which limited Love (tho a lot of the screw ups are on HIM esp INT).
The Ugly: You know. Never saw 1 play that stole defeat from the jaws of victory. 3 points pissed away AND great field position for them for winning FG drive.
Gotta play better v. Boys or it's 2-2.
The Szotman
Aldo
September 22, 2025 at 06:29 pm
Again, the lack of disciplined, tenacious football is not going to get the Packers anywhere. Discipline equals excellence in execution and makes no excuses for incompetence. That was not the Green Bay Packers by any stretch of the imagination on September 21, 2025.
Packerpasty
September 22, 2025 at 07:24 pm
how are the Packers ever going to get a run game going with this O line?? MLF better come up with some schemes to get Jacobs the ball somehow not just use him as a blocker all year...
BAMABADGER
September 22, 2025 at 08:01 pm
Watched film of Tom practicing on Wednesday, can't remember what podcast. He could barely run. I was shocked when they decide to start him. We always hear the Packers protect their injured players until more than ready to start. He may be out a month or more. Why didn't they consider Walker playing RT and Morgan at LT?
BAMABADGER
September 22, 2025 at 08:04 pm
Review the blocked field goal. The block was all on Tucker Kraft. Have know idea where his head was at. Didn't even know he lined up for FGs.
bjkdad44
September 22, 2025 at 09:36 pm
Undisciplined!
WinUSA
September 23, 2025 at 03:31 pm
Embarrassing! A half century… 50 Years!!!!!! And I NEVER saw such an astounding sloppy game!!!!
And the refs were WAY slanted toward the Browns.
Sure let’s keep the legalized gambling in pro sports!
Disgusted!!!!!!!!
Tundraboy
September 23, 2025 at 06:28 pm
Thank God I didn't watch this. I was at work and excitedly took time from my lunch break to check in on the game and the debacle of the last 2 minutes. Not seeing how it unfolded I was just ill.
I still can't believe what happened. Yuck. Just have to forget and move on