Cory's Corner: Gutey's Bold Move
Gutekunst was told no on a contract extension, so he responded by doing something most NFL general managers would never do.
One of Ed Policy’s first tasks when he became the Packers president and CEO was to simply say no.
Policy’s first day on the job was July 25 and it didn’t take him any time at all to decline a contract extension for Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst. His contract is set to expire at the end of the 2026 season.
It’s amazing what a simple no can do. You say no to your kid and he or she whines and complains until your breaking point is reached and you give in or until you just ignore it and stand firm.
Gutekunst went the other way. He said, “Fine, I’ll do something so amazing and extraordinary that an extension will be completely obvious.”
Gutekunst did exactly what the Packers hardly ever do. It has only happened three times in 106 years of being a franchise. In 1974, the Packers traded two first rounders for veteran quarterback John Hadl, which ultimately doomed the franchise. In 1992, the Packers traded a first rounder for the future Hall of Famer Brett Favre, And in 2018, they traded away a first rounder before eventually moving back up into the first round and drafting Jaire Alexander.
Gutekunst sent a three-time Pro Bowler in Kenny Clark and two first round picks to Dallas for one of the most dynamic players in the league. It’s a huge risk-reward decision, because if Micah Parsons gets injured, that $47 million per year becomes a huge burden.
But if anything, it says that Gutekunst is willing to do whatever it takes. Some people in the league are still surprised that the trade actually happened. That move should tell Policy that Gutekunst isn’t afraid to go and get it. There are plenty of teams that are close to a Super Bowl title but are missing that extra piece.
The question just comes down to, what are we going to do in order to get over the hump? Gutekunst identified where the Packers needed the biggest boost and then locked in by making sure a trade with Dallas was consummated.
Now this trade can fail — Parsons could become a team problem in the locker room or he could get injured. But even if the trade ultimately fails down the road, the fact that Gutekunst had the courage to do it should ensure his extension.
That may seem strange, but there are so many NFL general managers afraid to make a bold move because they don’t want to make a mistake. You cannot think that way. You have to think about making your team a contender each and every year.
I’m still surprised that Gutekunst was able to land one of the best pass rushers in the league. Mainly because that is a guy that you do not let out of your grasp. Teams are built to protect the quarterback and get to the quarterback. If you have found the guy that can consistently get to the quarterback, then you’ve done your job as a general manager.
Parsons, 26, ran a 4.36 40-yard dash coming out of Penn State — which is faster than a lot of wideouts. Of course he checks the versatile box by being able to play off-ball, on the edge or even drop into coverage. Since 2021, Parsons has a 30 percent pass-rush win rate, which means that he beats his blocker in 2.5 seconds on 30 percent of pass rush attempts.
Parsons is just different and in order to get playmakers, the price tag is usually pretty high. The fact that Gutekunst did that, really showed me that he was out to prove to Policy that he can do whatever it takes.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn
__________________________
Comments (62)
dobber
September 06, 2025 at 06:30 am
"One of Ed Policy’s first tasks when he became the Packers president and CEO was to simply say no.... His contract is set to expire at the end of the 2026 season....Gutekunst went the other way. He said, “Fine, I’ll do something so amazing and extraordinary that an extension will be completely obvious.”"
Good grief, can we stop this narrative? Two years left on his deal. TWO. He's not a lame duck. These things very likely have nothing to do with each other.
Oppy
September 06, 2025 at 07:04 am
But at least three people have said it, so it must be true
dobber
September 06, 2025 at 07:36 am
Which end of the bar were they sitting on?
Oppy
September 06, 2025 at 07:45 am
Wait.. so you're trying to tell me the bar ends at some point?
Guam
September 06, 2025 at 07:58 am
I was having a hard time connecting Cory's dots too Dobber. Just an odd narrative to suggest Gute wouldn't have made this move if his employment was more secure. I think Parsons was just an aggressive move made by a competent GM and would have been done with or without an extension.
Coldworld
September 06, 2025 at 08:45 am
He signed a 5 year extension in July 2022, as did LaFleur, so you are correct. I think it’s worth actually collating what has been said on this topic publicly, which is absent above. Pardon the length, but I think it essential to a rational take.
Back in June Policy spoke to reporters. During that conference he responded to a question on the contractual intentions with respect to the football leadership by saying that:
"All three of them (Ball, Gutekunst and LaFleur) [are] under multi-year contracts. None of them are up at the end of this year. We won't be doing anything going into this season."
…
“I'm generally opposed -- I'd never say never -- [but] I'm generally opposed to a coach or GM going into the last year of their contract” ... "That creates a lot of issues. I think normally you have a pretty good idea of where that relationship is going when you have two years left -- not always, but normally.”
…
"So I think generally speaking I would avoid lame-duck status. It's oftentimes difficult on everybody involved. But there are certain situations that probably call for it, so I would not say never."
That is the origin of the belief that this is a prove it year for not just Gute, but LaFleur and Ball as well. It sounds to me like that part of the premise that results are needed has some credibility though not specifically from Gute.
What I think is pure speculation is that it prompted the move for Parsons. Gute tried for Mack in the past, essentially matching the winning offer only to lose out on perceived pick priority reportedly. We do know, however, that the Packers offer was significant. Gute has regularly stated a willingness to swing for the fences if a truely exceptional player becomes free as well.
It’s worth remembering that Policy is not an outsider. The transition has been going on for a while, certainly predating the “urgency” comments. Gute and co. know him and him them. So his comments in January about urgency (partially quoted below) predate Policy officially, but are set against a background where his accession was known and his expectations likely understood when, on January 16, Gute said:
“"I think, for me, the thing that's been on my mind as we've concluded this season is we need to continue to ramp up our sense of urgency. These opportunities don't come (very often). The life of a player in the National Football League is not very long. We've got a bunch of good guys in that locker room, got a bunch of talented guys in that locker room, and yeah, I think it's time that we start competing for championships, right?
….
"I think they're [the player group] ready. Like I said, I think they are wired right. I think that group is the kind of guys that can do that. At the end of the day, you've got to go do it. ... I'm excited about the group, but the sense of urgency, not getting complacent… Some of these guys have now proven themselves to be NFL football players and have attained that, but what's out there for us as a team that we're willing to commit to and sacrifice for?"
That’s how the land lies in the public words of both Policy and Gute. Draw your own conclusions as to their overall significance with respect to all three individuals and also that in relation to Parsons (or Corey’s take).
Guam
September 06, 2025 at 09:40 am
Good summary of the history CW. Public words of a competent management team that wants a championship.
LeotisHarris
September 06, 2025 at 10:42 am
There's more out there about when Jim Ringo sent his agent in to negotiate with Policy, but it's not gaining meme-level traction ('scuse me, what's that?). oh, it's not gaining meme-level traction YET!
Bitternotsour
September 06, 2025 at 11:03 am
The thing Gutekunst should be worried about given the Policy family history is if Ed makes him an offer he can't refuse.
LeotisHarris
September 06, 2025 at 02:23 pm
A horse's head here and there, who's counting?
TKWorldWide
September 06, 2025 at 07:38 am
It was a 4.39 at Penn State’s Pro Day.
Details matter in an investigation.
dobber
September 06, 2025 at 08:03 am
...probably not his GPA.
LambeauPlain
September 06, 2025 at 09:42 am
If Penn State grades on a 5 pt scale, it could be his GPA.
Parsons has awed Hafley and the coaches with his incredible football IQ, understanding complex concepts quickly and understanding the underlying strategy for individual plays...and what tactics he can use to win the play.
dobber
September 06, 2025 at 10:08 am
"If Penn State grades on a 5 pt scale, it could be his GPA."
Ok...I'll buy that.
<<tips hat>>
TKWorldWide
September 06, 2025 at 02:43 pm
(I got that from Reacher.) 😉
NitschkeFromTheGrave
September 06, 2025 at 07:39 am
Is this really Corry's article?
Because a junior high almost graduate could have come up with a more interesting story with some substance.
LambeauPlain
September 06, 2025 at 07:53 am
Another SMH article from the keyboard of Cory that flows out of an imaginary occurrence.
So let me understand the entire premise of this fantasy story: One of the FIRST things, as the new President and CEO did was to "decline a contract extension for Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst" who has TWO MORE YEARS on his contract.
Really? Did Ed next march into Russ Ball's office and tell him "no extension for you!" Then head over to LaFleur's digs and tell him "no extension for you!"
To paraphrase Dire Straits: "That's the way you do it, extensions are for nothing, so you better please me!"
Amazing! You nailed it Cory! You cracked the code behind Ed! He's an intimidating task master pushing his direct reports to take huge risks to justify remaining in their position. If the risks don't reward...well, too bad for you!
dobber
September 06, 2025 at 08:01 am
" Did Ed next march into Russ Ball's office and tell him "no extension for you!" Then head over to LaFleur's digs and tell him "no extension for you!""
Well...maybe he was trying to get his steps in...
"You cracked the code behind Ed!"
OK....so the new sheriff in town doesn't want to do things the same way as Murphy...hawt takes? GO!!!
stockholder
September 06, 2025 at 07:56 am
Cory you could have added 1 more trade.
When The packers traded for John Jefferson.
WR Audra Thompson
A 1983 1st rd pick
A 1982 2nd pick
A 1984 2nd pick
The right to exchange first rd choices in 1982
Jefferson Contract disputes caused him to be traded a lot.
So looking back - I have to question
Policy first task.
Boneman
September 06, 2025 at 08:38 am
I remember being so excited about this trade! Lofton and Jefferson together, Lynn Dickey throwing to them. Never really worked out though. Jefferson was just OK and Dickey began decline. Fun for a minute though.
barutanseijin
September 06, 2025 at 08:47 am
Just think! Bart could have picked so many more Bruce Clarks and Rich Campbells!
Ray-66
September 06, 2025 at 01:45 pm
Also, Mossy Cade cost a first round in 1986.
packer132
September 07, 2025 at 08:45 pm
SH: Here is an idea; live in the present and not 40 years ago. Different time and you can't compare, even from 10 years ago. So what about would a should a drafted or traded for this guy. You play with what you have and I think the Packers have done a great job. Second best record in NFL since 2015.
NFLfan
September 06, 2025 at 08:36 am
Gute made a bold move because his own first picks never really flowered-LVN, Gary, Wyatt, Q Walker and many more.
I hope Policy proves to be team-centric.
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 09:43 am
F'n A
I'll give my take on why Gute made this move further down.
LambeauPlain
September 06, 2025 at 09:57 am
All 4 players you diss are on defense and had to endure 2 or 3 years under Barry Ball. Hafley, unlike Barry, knows the talents and skills of his players to put them in position to make plays. Not soft zone/prevent D for the entire season.
Hafley said he would adjust the defense every week for the next opponent and create matchups to attack their weaknesses. He has. 6th best D in the NFL last year with heavy contributions from all 4 players who you say are dying flowers on the vine. I believe the other flower, LaFleur, disagrees with you. I know Hafley does because he plays them A LOT.
Gary is a 2 time pro bowler...and one of the best edge rushers in the NFL. The other 3 players are going into the their second year of the Hafley pressure defense...vision and break...swarm to the ball and make the takedown.
All 4 are playing Hafley's Defense very well and will only get better...and bloom where they are planted.
barutanseijin
September 06, 2025 at 11:34 am
Perhaps you are familiar with a Cardinals draft bust named Simmons? Well, guess what Cardinals fans used to say about him? That’s right, “if only he would have had better DC, a consistent scheme he could’ve been somebody, an-All Pro, a contender…”.
EnemyTerritory
September 07, 2025 at 12:42 pm
And this means what? I fail to see the relevance …. Scans roster…doesn’t see Simmons…
NFLfan
September 06, 2025 at 11:34 am
All 4 players were coached by Hafley last year-Someone whiffed (MLF or Hafley) by retaining Rebrovich but there is no excuse for the mediocre play of the 4 I 'dissed'.
Gute clearly didn't think the 4 I dissed were acceptable either-Parsons?
WestCoastPackerBacker
September 06, 2025 at 01:59 pm
Three of the four played hurt last season (as did Kenny Clark, Jordan Love and more). I want to see these guys healthy working in the Hafley defense I don’t think we’ve seen what they can do. And as a team the Dcwas in the top 5-10 in most defensive stats. Not a perfect D but a good one for being the youngest team with a new coordinator. They will all benefit from the addition of Parsons and his effectiveness and ability to play from several positions.
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 01:55 pm
"Gary is a 2 time pro bowler" - LP
Not sure where you get your NFL knowledge
Is this another fictional story?
".....and one of the best edge rushers in the NFL"
Nice!!....lol
He's lucky he's a one time Pro Bowler based on his numbers last season.
Not sure how 7.5 sacks and 26 solo tackles gets you a Pro bowl nod, but ok.
I guess Kyler Fackrell should have gone to the Pro Bowl in 2018 when he had 10.5 sacks and 29 solo tackles in 16 games.
WestCoastPackerBacker
September 06, 2025 at 02:30 pm
There were only four players with a higher pressure rate than Rashan Gary since he entered the league. Those players are named Parsons, Bosa, Hendrickson, and Garrett. He’s also the top ranked edge rusher against the run. So he’s not a one trick pony, he’s an all-around great defensive player. It’s possible to affect the offense even when it doesn’t end up in the sack column. It doesn’t mean he’s not being effective in his role.
Since'75
September 07, 2025 at 03:21 pm
Well, lets put it this way, Canton is in no danger of having to make room for Gary.
He's a slightly above average player with a contract paying him to be a difference maker.
He's never been a difference maker, and he doesn't show up in the playoffs.
If you want to give Gary his flowers, more power to you.
It's one thing to be paid 'elite'.
It's another to be 'elite'
Rashan Gary is a good player, he's not elite.
Sorry
WestCoastPackerBacker
September 06, 2025 at 02:27 pm
Players with a higher QB pressure rate than Rashan Gary since he entered the league:
Parsons
Bosa
Hendrickson
Garrett
That’s the entire list of players that had a higher rate of pressure than Gary. Oh and ESPN had Gary ranked as the number one edge rusher against the run in 2024.
It’s completely clueless to consider Gary a poor draft pick. Pressuring a QB is key for the D and with help on the other side Gary should really contribute this season.
Packers0808
September 06, 2025 at 08:45 am
Isn't drafting done with team work and then they select who they think best for whatever round. Why do they always say Gutes first rounders?
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 09:46 am
Simple....the ultimate decision is Gute's.
He makes the pick.
It isn't complicated.
LambeauPlain
September 06, 2025 at 10:07 am
Sure, someone has to call the NFL and provide the selection...but Gutey has stated the Packer Draft Board is put together by consensus by the personnel team with additional input from the coaching staff while building it pre draft.
He makes the pick, but I do not believe there are any surprises in the Packer War Room when it is decided.
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 01:31 pm
Oh jeez....nobody questioned anything about, 'who puts together the draft board', except you.
All draft boards are put together by mainly scouts.
But, here's maybe what you don't understand..there is always one guy, one guy who makes the final decision.
The draft room is a very fluid and fast moving operation, phone's ring, calls are made, trade's happen, trades don't happen, draft boards move in ways they didn't anticipate, scenario's change, therefore strategy's change.
Someone is in charge, someone has the final say.
PSSSTT......IT'S THE GM!!
Lets not spread that around though, lets keep that between us, ok.
You're welcome.
LambeauPlain
September 06, 2025 at 07:17 pm
For what?
RobinsonDavis
September 06, 2025 at 09:30 am
Ehh! A little cranky this morning, are we??? Time for football!!
Skimming the subline, I incorrectly thought this may be about a player's potential extension that was denied by that player or their agent...Not a Gute extension, or lack thereof. So, I will digress and opine about my original thought, which odds are, HAS happened or, at least, negotiations sidelined.
The Parsons/Clark trade actually opened some doors, but may have closed others due to cap and time restraints, IMO. But importantly, it's probable that negotiations for other extensions had to be sidelined until they had a contract agreement with Micah and agent, so that Russ & Gute fully understood their cap projections. It will be interesting to see if we get any rare in-season extensions given the special circumstances of the blockbuster trade and/or some in-season pick-ups to the roster.
GO PACK!
LambeauPlain
September 06, 2025 at 10:11 am
What is your evidence the Parsons deal was linked to an extension for Gutey's contract that still has TWO seasons to go?
I don't think this narrative is probable at all.
RobinsonDavis
September 07, 2025 at 09:13 am
Read it again, Lambeau! I did not state that AT ALL! It is probable that other PLAYERS' negotiations were sidelined until the Parson's contract was finalized, was the point.
PackBacker
September 06, 2025 at 09:32 am
I'm obviously looking forward to seeing the results from the newest Packer, Micah Parsons. But I'm even more thrilled to anticipate the steady diet of quarterback sacks that Rashan Gary will be feasting on because of all the double team attention Parsons will be getting, starting tomorrow. Enjoy your food, Rashan! And it's okay if you put on a few pounds from all the dead-meat quarterbacks you'll be consuming.
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 10:29 am
Hope you're right, because i'd be about G D time.
Dragon5
September 06, 2025 at 10:10 am
"But even if the trade ultimately fails down the road, the fact that Gutekunst had the courage to do it should ensure his extension."
I had to do a double take and check today's date to make sure it's not April 1st.
Good grief Charlie Brown🤦♂️
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 10:28 am
WOW..where to start.
Buth Gute and MLF have expiring contracts in '26.
Most NFL teams like those two positions to be of the same length for obvious reasons.
It's why Ryan Poles just got extended for the Bears, to match Ben Johnsons deal.
Which i personally find comical. Typical Bear move.
Extend a GM with a .300 winning percentage.
Now, for more entertainment......
Lets NOT act like we know what Gute said or thought after getting denied an extension.
Basing that 'fiction' on the 'reason' why he made this trade?
C'MON MAN.
This article further states that even if this trade fails, it ensures that Gute will get an extension regardless.
"Now this trade can fail — the fact that Gutekunst had the courage to do it should ensure his extension." - CJ
Lol...you actually believe that?
My friend...maybe it's time to put down the bottle and sleep it off. Just sayin.
Usually....when you give away two 1st round picks and a Pro Bowl player for a trade that failed....
Usually.....you don't get 'rewarded' with an extension!!
But that's just my dumb opinion, what do i know, i'm not a sports writer.
***********
CJ calls this move a 'high risk-high reward trade.'
That may be true in football parlance.
But for Gute, career wise in Packerland...
It is a low risk - high reward move.
I'll tell you why.
If the Packers don't get past the divisional round in the playoffs, it's a failure that is becoming a pattern and no extension is given, maybe the opposite.
If the Packers get past the Divisional playoff round and Parsons plays well.
Extensions are almost a given, for both Gute and MLF
THE V.O.R.
LambeauPlain
September 06, 2025 at 11:31 am
"...after getting denied an extension."
What and where is the evidence Gutey asked for, and was denied and extension for a contract that has two years to go? Or Policy, out of the blue, as first action, decided to deny a non existent request for some reason.
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 01:07 pm
What, and where is the evidence you have a High School diploma?
**********
Is that question directed at me, or Cory?
Maybe you should ask Cory, he brought it up.
I was replying to Cory's article genius.
LambeauPlain
September 07, 2025 at 07:30 am
The more you post insulting and arrogant, know it all comments, it reinforces the best about them is probably the avatar photo you found online on some "site". Although that photo says a lot about you too.
Since'75
September 07, 2025 at 03:52 pm
I stated earlier, i have to get my thumbs down back up over my thumbs up.
It's working.
But i'm sorry, i didn't mean to hurt your feelings.
I understand you live here, my apologies.
I'll try to be more sensitive to your feelings.
It does say a lot LP, i like sexy women.
Don't spread it around though, it's not something i'm proud of
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 01:09 pm
"Policy’s first day on the job was July 25 and it didn’t take him any time at all to decline a contract extension for Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst." - Cory
Since'75
September 07, 2025 at 03:45 pm
Hey, i didn't say it....lol
dobber
September 07, 2025 at 03:50 pm
Agreed: "Denied" is a terrible choice of words to begin with.
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 10:55 am
With what i said above, i like this trade on the surface. As i said in the past, it's a all in move in a 2-3 year window.
With trades, like draft picks, there are no guarantee's either way.
But if you don't try to move forward....you usually don't.
Now....the time for Gute to make an 'all in' move (imo) was in 2020, when the Packers reached the NFCCG, not one, but two seasons in a row.
THAT was a good time to go 'all in'.
But....what did Gute do?
Drafted a 1st round bench player for 3 years, looking towards the future, then proceeded to whiff on a 2nd round guy they called Quadzilla. Who already has a foot outside of the NFL door right now.
He hasn't averaged 4 YPC since 2022.
Are those the moves that Gute made to propel the Packers from the NFCCG to the Super Bowl in 2020?
Of course it wasn't, he was 'obviously' drafting for the future.
Meaning.....he gave up on that current team.
Yes, it still bothers me.
When you get that close to the SB, you make a move!!!!
You don't 'give up'.
But now, when he wants an extension, he goes all in?
I mean, this team can't win a divisional playoff game, but he'll go all in now?
Hmmmmmm.
barutanseijin
September 06, 2025 at 12:24 pm
What more did those teams need? They had a guy whom many of you believe to be the greatest quarterback ever. Aaron Jones, a n excellent LT and left guard, Davante Adams and a bunch of #1 picks on D. A couple of those teams went 13-3 and the 2021 team was 13-4. One of those defenses intercepted Tom Brady 3 times in the conference championship game. All of that should have been enough.
Since'75
September 06, 2025 at 01:01 pm
You're right, they had enough, thank you!!.
When you get to the NFCCG, and you can't win it, a smart GM will always cut bait and start drafting for the future because, that current team.....had enough and had their chance.
WOW...brilliant!!
Thank you so much, i love it here because i learn so much!!
**************
Yes, we intercepted Brady 3 times.
The defense also gave up 3 easy TD's. I mean EASY TD's!!
2 by ALL PRO Kevin King, one on a dumb as F..., completely mis-timed jump (Evans). The other, King just got burned deep (Miller).
Them Amos, just lets the Bucs tight end (Brate) run right by him (barely even gave him a look) at the 15, ran right into the end zone... STOOD WIDE OPEN, TD!!
3 easy TD's....21 points.
NOTE: Actually Gute did try to improve that 2020 team, he resigned Kevin King to a new contract.
YIPPEE!!
Can't win a Championship with Kevin King.
Kevin King is now changing oil at Janis's Tire and Auto shop, after his shift at Kwik trip.
******
Should we bring up the Seattle NFCCG?
Up by 12 with 5 1/2 minutes left.
Then.....the clown show started.
*********
"What more did those teams need?"
Good one barutan.....
Always keep em laughing.
Since'75
September 07, 2025 at 03:54 pm
You got nothing?
Shocking.
PackersNightingale
September 06, 2025 at 03:43 pm
Gutekunst continues to destroy the Packers.
Bad enough that Gutenkunst was given a talented team team on the brink of Superbowls and instead of adding the missing piece – a top college receiver – “Gutey” drafts the poor guy – Jordan – that had just led all of College football in throwing interceptions and showed the same lack of accuracy in college he has shown in the NFL.
Then he pisses off future 1st team Hall of Famer Davante Adams and loses him.
Then the team had just gone 13-3, 13-3, 13-4 – and was 3-1 at the time future NFL 1st ballot Hall of Famer - breaks the thumb on his throwing hand but plays the season through it – and “Gutey” despite the team having the best record in the NFL over that 42-10 span throws away the longest tenured Packer of all time and continues to destroy team chemistry, giving away Rasul Douglas and then Aaron Jones and now Kenny Clark.
And what have the Packers to show for all these “Gutey” moves - $75 million guaranteed signing bonus and 6 year $220 million contract ($160.3 guaranteed) – through 2028-29 - to Jordan whose NFL record as a starter at the time of his signing on July 28, 2024, after holding Gutey’s feet to the fire with a “Hold In” was:
10 wins 10 losses
and now is:
19 wins 17 losses and actually should be 18 wins and 17 losses as Malik Willis should be the QB credited with the Jacksonville win.
And 1-5 vs. the Division! - 0-6 if Karl Brooks doesn’t get a finger on the field goal attempt.
0-6 against the Lions, Vikings and Eagles!!
And now this huge $188 million, ($120million fully guaranteed at signing and 136 million total guaranteed) contract to injured goods Micah Parsons, who may need an epidural to play on Sunday and what were the Cowboys WITH Parsons last year:
Points Allowed 468 31st in the league!!!
Rushing Yards Allowed per Carry: 4.8 yards per carry, 28th in the league!
Dallas had nearly the worst Defense in the NFL with Micah as its star!!
Watch Dallas Defense improve with Packer Kenny Clark playing a starring role.
Meanwhile Rodgers plays for $10 million in 2025 and Rodgers performance looks better than our - $75 million guaranteed bonus already in the bank - for our $220 million, $55 million per year Jordan over the last 10 games of 2024-25:
TDS: Rodgers 18 Jordan 10
Interceptions: Rodgers 4 Jordan 5
Completion %: Rodgers 64.0% Jordan 63.8%
Passer Rating: Rodgers 97.0 Jordan 93,4
Makes you wonder if the other 31 NFL billionaire owners planted Gutekunst in his position to tank Green Bay and lower the team’s financial value and set them up for a “privatization” scheme with some billionaire to acquire and privatize the team for a song. Over all these years they must have hated seeing the only community/communist/socialist version of football doing so well without the need for a hoarding profit making billionaire. I am sure they are drooling over the prospect of profiting off the Packers.
PackerBackerAZ
September 06, 2025 at 06:04 pm
Your psychiatrist is failing you. Your last paragraph is alarmingly deficient of any reality.
I believe that a gm and hc should be gone after six years of not going to a Super Bowl.
As bad as Gutekunst's first round picks have been, his trades and free agent acquisitions have been polar opposite stellar. Hopefully, Golden will be Gutekunst's second elite first round draft pick. Getting Parsons will improve Gary, Van Ness and Wyatt statistically. His failure to improve the cornerback room might come back to haunt the Packers. I hope the d-line will prevent the corners from being consistently torched.
I'm riding that Pack is Back Super Bowl train because of the Parsons trade. Injuries and lack of cornerback improvement can always derail the train. For now, I believe the Packers can get to and win the Super Bowl with the team they have now. Love doesn't need to be elite, just adequate while cutting down on bad decisions.
With the expiring contracts it might be a one year window. One year is better than none.
dobber
September 07, 2025 at 03:51 pm
Look at the spacing. It's a cut and paste diatribe moving from site to site.
Don't give this guy the time of day.
Leatherhead
September 06, 2025 at 04:26 pm
I'd like to know what you're smoking, because I wouldn't want to accidentally get ahold of it.
PackerBackerAZ
September 06, 2025 at 06:49 pm
Policy said of Ball, Gutekunst and LaFleur. "None of them are up at the end of this year. We won't be doing anything going into this season." That's from an interview with ESPN. I doubt that he had to say no to an extension for any of the three. That's Policy's policy and I'm sure the three are aware of it. Just a very poor take on a non-issue.