Does Zaire Franklin Trade Foreshadow a Splash at Defensive Tackle?
Green Bay is now in a situation where they must address defensive tackle before the draft.
By markoldacres

Trading Colby Wooden for Zaire Franklin helped plug one roster hole ahead of free agency, but made a pre-existing roster problem even more pressing.
Adding Franklin makes sense, even coming off a down year. He was worse than Quay Walker last year, but in 2024 had a better season than any Walker has produced. Franklin could also cost half of what Walker will when he hits the open market.
The Packers probably gauged what it would cost to keep Walker and made this corresponding move, looking for a cheaper solution. More than just solving the linebacker position though, the trade may say something about what Green Bay is ready to do at defensive tackle.
Their situation on the interior was already bad, and they just made it worse. Wooden was their best run defender last year per PFF, and he only ranked 88th out of 127 eligible players. The other three (Karl Brooks, Devonte Wyatt and Warren Brinson) were all in the bottom 20.
Wyatt and Brooks are out of contract after this upcoming season, and Brinson is a former 6th round pick, not a pillar of stability to rely on long-term.
Because they at least had bodies at defensive tackle, there was a world where Green Bay rolled into the draft with their core group of Wyatt, Wooden, Brooks, Brinson and Stackhouse and tried to address it there.
That surely cannot be the case now for a team who likes to enter the draft with no glaring holes so they can take the best player available.
Most of the free agency class at defensive tackle is old, and signing those kinds of players is not usually what the Packers do.
But in itself, acquiring Franklin, who will turn 30 this year, looks like a sign they are open to bringing older players onto the team after being the youngest roster in the league for three straight seasons.
If they want to add a defensive tackle in free agency with proven quality, that’s what they are going to have to do. Thinking outside the box, could the Franklin acquisition be a precursor to another trade at defensive tackle?
The trade market has already been very active across the league before the new league year has begun, and it should continue to be the case, especially as free agent pools seem to get more tepid with each passing year.
Green Bay is in line to collect as many as four compensatory picks in the 2027 draft due to the players they are about to lose, and would surely like to protect those by not spending too much in free agency.
Another player for player swap would accomplish that goal, although those deals are often tricky to do.
On the other hand, if signing a free agent could potentially cost them a comp pick anyway, there is not much difference between doing that, and trading a pick for a player now, then still getting the comp picks.
A defensive tackle trade would not necessarily mean the Packers are shopping for a high end player, but Brian Gutekunst showed his willingness to be aggressive last year, and recently said the “most important thing” with their decisions is how they can compete for a championship in 2026.
The recent trade seems to imply that one way or another, they will make a more proactive move to fix the defensive tackle position.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres
__________________________




Comments (14)
splitpea1
March 09, 2026 at 10:28 am
What do they say, "age is just a number"? Franklin-Myers has started virtually all games the past five seasons. Very solid run and pass defender, leaps and bound betters than anyone we currently have. I would welcome this signing in a nanosecond, but there will be a lot of competition for him, so don't get crazy with overpayment.
Dragon5
March 09, 2026 at 01:06 pm
If he's hurt and / or underperforms the majority of his enemy year, will you still feel the same? He's also a 7 life path; 7s & injury are like PB & J
GreenandBold
March 10, 2026 at 05:24 pm
Oh yeah I forgot
MaruishiEmperor
March 10, 2026 at 06:12 am
"Very solid....and run defender". Where did you get that info? Everything reported on him says he is a mediocre pass defender. Suggest you do more research before commenting. Packers got this guy for salary cap/cost reasons vs what Quay Walker would have cost. He'll play early run downs but get pulled out of obvious passing situations.
splitpea1
March 10, 2026 at 11:13 am
I was talking about possibly acquiring DT Franklin-Myers, not the LB Franklin. I just forgot to add the "-Myers" in the post...the unedited comment did look pretty bad.
GregC
March 09, 2026 at 11:37 am
Trading away Wooden, combined with probably moving to more of a 3-4 base, makes me think the Packers could very well acquire two new defensive linemen before the draft and then draft one in the second or third round. I've heard that Gannon likes bigger defensive linemen. Karl Brooks is around 300 pounds but is not stout against the run, so I wonder if he may be traded or cut.
MaruishiEmperor
March 10, 2026 at 06:15 am
Reading the tea leaves, I think the Packers will sign that big tackle that played for the Cardinals...the one that is about to turn 40 years old. He'll be a cap friendly 1-year signing. Sorry but I don't remember his name.
greengold
March 09, 2026 at 11:56 am
I'm going to say no. Gutekunst has his system we fans have learned to be a pattern. He adds a veteran at a position of need, then drafts for same position. LB simply happens to be a need position, and I'd expect more of the same at our other need positions as FA opens.
nagawicka
March 09, 2026 at 05:17 pm
zackly. Gutekunst addressing any position will: sign a veteran free agent of two (Jennings, Kennard), draft an early & a late round pick (Morgan Glover Monk; VanNess Wooden Brooks)-- or two mids, and have a pool of UDFAs (Baldwin) on-hand cycling through the practice squad (Mosby, Cox, Ford). Gute does this for specific positions he needs to shore up, and all the time anyway. Valentine, Ballentine, Kalen King, Hobbs. Every position.
GreenandBold
March 10, 2026 at 05:29 pm
Valentine Ballentine King and Hobbs sounds like a legal firm not a bunch of corners . Oh wait they really aren’t much as corners .
Houndog
March 09, 2026 at 12:32 pm
I don't know what to think!
To me it looked like a Zaire Franklin for Quay Walker trade, while losing Wooden in the process.
Help me make sense of that, Wooden seemed like a kid on the rise!
GreenandBold
March 10, 2026 at 05:31 pm
That’s the sad part on the Packers he seemed to be on the rise cause he tanked 88th against the run .
golfpacker61
March 09, 2026 at 02:29 pm
Calais Campbell would look great in Green Bay. Maybe Dominique Orange in the 2nd round or Iowa DT Aaron Graves in the 5th/6th.
nagawicka
March 09, 2026 at 05:17 pm
IN. In the draft.