Engineering a Titletown Sack Machine

The Packers' pass rush goes from weakness to strength

Looking back at the 2024 season, when you look at statistics, the Green Bay Packers don't look that bad when it comes to sacking the opposing quarterback. They were in a three-way tie for eighth in the league with 45 sacks on the season. Not too shabby, right? Well, wrong actually. 45 sacks on the season gives you an average of roughly 2.6 sacks per game, but the Packers had 10 games where they fell below this average. In fact, seven of those games either had only one sack or none. That 45-sack total was bolstered by two games where the Packers' pass rush feasted on poor opposing offensive lines for a total of eight and seven sacks, respectively. That means about 33% of the team's season sack total occurred in only two games. Not ideal. 

One could question, if they didn't get the sack, did they at least rush the QB? Unfortunately, they didn't do so hot in that area either. As a team, the Packers had a pass rush win rate of only 35%, which is good enough for 26th in the league. With pass rushers Rashan Gary, Lukas Van Ness, and, for half the season, Preston Smith being three of their highest compensated players for the season, to rank so low is unacceptable. Obviously, something had to change. 

And it did. The Packers brought in a new defensive line coach in DeMarcus Covington, they invested further effort into Lukas Van Ness having a third-year breakout season, and they recently traded for premier pass rusher Micah Parsons. 

All offseason long, we heard that the Packers didn't do a thing to improve their pass rush. No free agent signing, no prime draft investment on the position, nothing. The articles read that the team was destined for a repeat of last year or worse. 

But then training camp came along, and it was noticed how disruptive Lukas Van Ness had become in the pass rush. Edgerrin Cooper as well. Brains shifted to thinking perhaps they could be better if Lukas Van Ness' improvement was real. Perhaps a new perspective from a new defensive line coach could pour a little bit of lighter fluid on the flame. Then came the Micah Parsons trade, and that lighter fluid just became an entire barrel full of gasoline. 

Now the Packers' pass rush went from the family dog that might bite you if you push it far enough, to a full-blown werewolf to haunt the nightmares of anyone who ducks under center. 

Manufacturing Nightmare Fuel

A little over a month ago, while talking about Lukas Van Ness making noise in Training Camp, I mentioned the Packers' premier pass rusher in the early 2010s, Clay Matthews. Matthews wreaked havoc on defenses in his first few seasons, but after a while, the Packers' pass rusher ran into a problem; he was the only formidable pass-rushing threat the team possessed. That meant opposing offenses could focus on knocking him out of the play and not worrying about anyone else. Matthews needed a running mate, a pass rusher on the opposite side to take the heat off him. Imagine if in 2012, the Packers traded for another premier pass-rusher like Von Miller. That pass rush would've been lights out as Matthews and Miller would have competed for who could get to the QB first. 

Today, while he doesn't have the career stat line of Clay Matthews, Rashan Gary very much has suffered the same fate. Gary is a skilled pass rusher who has no issue being disruptive, but the problem is, he has no one to help take the attention and pressure off him. Until now. Micah Parsons could be to Rashan Gary what Von Miller would've been to Clay Matthews had such a move occurred. Not only could this take attention off stopping Gary, but this takes it off everyone else as well. 

In the 2024 season, Jeff Hafley demonstrated some creativity with stunts in the pass rush, sending Edgerrin Cooper all over the field to generate pressure. Late in training camp, some of those looks were shown utilizing both Quay Walker and Cooper on stunts around the defensive line. 

Stunts are usually referred to as a manufactured pass rush. The defense is using trickery to confuse the offensive line into making a mistake or missing an assignment, so that one or more rushers spring free to rush the quarterback. This is what you get when your pass rushers aren't frequently winning the battle at the line of scrimmage. This isn't always the case, but it's usually a good chance you'll get a pass rush when you need it out of these play designs. 

Now, the Packers have a pass rusher who, in 2024, tied for third in pass-rush win rate. With Micah Parsons, they have the best of both worlds. Who do you focus on? If you double-team or chip Rashan Gary on one end, Parsons could make you pay on the other. If your tackles can win vs Gary and Parsons one-on-one on the edges, are your interior linemen going to pick up Cooper, Walker, or even Van Ness coming in on the inside? Not to mention an interior lineman like Devonte Wyatt, who could benefit from some of the attention focusing elsewhere. 

The Packers aren't a team that just traded for Micah Parsons to single-handedly revive their pass rush. They traded for Micah Parsons to be Micah Parsons, but also possibly be the spark that frees Rashan Gary, Devonte Wyatt, Lukas Van Ness, Edgerrin Cooper, Quay Walker, and maybe more players to make this defense the best pass-rushing unit in the league.  

All the Packers need is for Micah Parsons to be Micah Parsons, and the sky could be the limit for their defense. 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (19)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Lphill's picture

September 03, 2025 at 02:07 pm

Cooper will benefit from Parsons coming on board.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

September 03, 2025 at 03:18 pm

And he is not the only one!

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

September 04, 2025 at 08:48 am

Everyone on the team will benefit. Think how Mlf and Love can be more aggressive knowing their D can get them the ball back quicker or without an opponent score. I can’t wait!!!!

0 points
0
0
D_Dave_Wittmann's picture

September 03, 2025 at 03:32 pm

"The Packers had 10 games where they fell below this average."
"7 games ... 1 or 0."
"2 games ... for a total of 8 and 7 sacks, respectively ... 33%"
Every time I hear this, something's always left out: 31 other teams.
The Packers may have the most games below average.
They may have the most games with 1 or 0.
They may have the most in 2 games.
Do they?
Some other team?
Multiple other teams?
How does this compare to other teams?
I need to know.
Give me these same numbers for all 32 teams.
And give me the sacks each game, 17 numbers, for each team.
Then I can compare how bad this is
for the Packers compared to other teams.
All teams, to some extent, have this problem:
fluctuations below or above average.
Leaving this out exaggerates how bad the Packers' problem is.
The Packers may have the worst problem with this,
but it is mitigated because other teams have it too (at least a little).
For example: no team had 51 sacks with exactly 3 every game.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

September 03, 2025 at 03:50 pm

Yes, good point!
I have no doubt that GB was not the ONLY team to beat up on bad offensive lines.
Heck, the Eagles had fewer total sacks in the regular season, but oh baby did they look like world beaters in the post season.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

September 03, 2025 at 03:54 pm

This is a fair ask. Though the article is still valid as it shows too how bad we measured against the league in hurries/pressures/hits which implies to me anyway, that the other 10 games sacks were isolated without much pressure before or after that 1 sack a game. Also, I would be curious how many of those sacks came from our front 4 only without having to blitz LB's, CB's, or Safeties? From my memories of watching all the games, I don't remember a whole hell of a lot of pressure or sacks coming from that front 4 group. I remember a fair amount of blitzes that ended up being stuffed with wide open catches in the middle of the of the field where our CB's and safeties were playing too deep. To the premise of this article, pressure/sacks/hits/hurries with our front 4 need a great deal of improvement. Hopefully with Parson's we will be able to accomplish this and be top ten in most defensive categories.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

September 03, 2025 at 03:59 pm

It isn't just about sacks but about pressures and causing chaos. The Packers D didn't get on the other side of the LOS enough to cause havoc.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 03, 2025 at 04:11 pm

Two things were notably and consistently absent. An ability to get into the backfield quickly in the middle and, in contrast, plenty of that from the edges, but a lack of agility to redirect that inside rather than overshooting.

Parsons should address the second one of those directly, and perhaps that was the hope behind picking Oliver too. We need more from Wyatt, who was the exception inside when briefly healthy, Brooks and Brinson at the 3T spot.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 04, 2025 at 08:17 am

It's always the same thing from the boo-birds when a Packers pass rusher, who has been deemed "bad" by some fans, produces a solid sack total or win rate or pressure rate or hit rate.

It's always "but we played x number of teams with bad o-lines", or, "but the numbers are skewed because he had two games where he racked up multiple sacks", etc etc etc.

...as though other pass rushers on other teams don't play x number of teams with bad o-lines, or other pass rushers on other teams don't have a couple of big games where an unusual amount of sacks get tallied.

It's always the same with these people, and I don't think they even realize the isolated bias they display. There's no level comparison across the board.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

September 03, 2025 at 03:56 pm

It will be interesting how they use the roster. On passing down do they kick Gary or LVN in or keep them on the edge and move Parsons around? I think Xavier could end up leading the league in INTs with the pass rush. Diggs wasn't a great cover CB who benefited from the chaos Parsons caused. The worry of course is that the D is light in the pants. Have to be able to hold the point of attack to stop the run. That might be a challenge.

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

September 03, 2025 at 04:43 pm

If we can’t stop the run won’t matter

The lions had the most snaps under center last year.

Plus the most when we played them at home in the rain

We sat in the pistol or shotgun in the rain with Jenkins playing center. Why?..

Who ever team plays under the center most wins

Love needs to get back to that..

0 points
0
0
Racingdad's picture

September 04, 2025 at 08:12 am

Don’t you realize love was playing injured ? That’s why not many under center snaps

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

September 04, 2025 at 09:01 am

This isn't the 80s anymore. KC ran 77% of its plays in shotgun and Baltimore runs out of it almost exclusively. I seem to remember both teams doing very well last year. Philly ran out of the shotgun the majority of the time as well. Running out of the shotgun is just fine. As Baltimore shows you can have a power run game in that formation.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

September 04, 2025 at 08:06 am

Detroit will be a good test of the Packer rush defense as they were one of the better rushing teams last season.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

September 04, 2025 at 04:12 pm

This cannot be understated. Great point, Guam.

I do like the idea of Wyatt, Wooden, Brooks & Co. getting way more snaps, allowing them to settle in, learn more and improve as solid trench players.

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

September 03, 2025 at 04:00 pm

I too remember how ineffective we seemed to be pressuring while also allowing wide open TE's to roam 10 yards past the LOS.
That seemed to be our Achilles heel during critical down/distances during all big games.
I don't really care what the year end statistics say.
Nose test said something was off.
Hopefully the subject of the article makes those issues go away.
GPG!

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

September 03, 2025 at 07:08 pm

Players, not Plays.

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

September 03, 2025 at 04:40 pm

Look out for lots of screens. Lions will run those

I bet they have both the running backs on the field at the same time.

Goff will run also.

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

September 03, 2025 at 04:44 pm

They will go two backs a lot I bet. Get them on line backers.. spread out lions way of playing

Need guys to tackle and get turnovers

0 points
0
0