Green Bay Packers v. Washington: Behind the Numbers
Here is a closer look at the stats and figures that you need to know from the Green Bay Packers' win over Washington.
By Paul_Bretl

3
10
5
9
9
123
0/4 and 2/4
5/15
3
13
95
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Born and raised in Green Bay, WI and I still call it home. After my family, watching the Packers, sharing my opinions on the team through my writing and interacting with other fans is my greatest passion. You can find me on Twitter at @Paul_Bretl.




Comments (20)
LambeauPlain
October 25, 2021 at 11:25 am
AZ is going to be tough to pass on ranking 3rd in the NFL for yards given up per play. Stingy pass D.
However their run D is ranked 31st!
Pound the rock!
Coldworld
October 25, 2021 at 12:05 pm
And spy the QB.
PatrickGB
October 25, 2021 at 12:13 pm
Campbell mentioned his experience against Murray. He thought it’s more about lane discipline than using a defender to spy. But with Grey running the defense on Thursday, you might be right. Yet for me, I don’t like the idea of a spy. It means one less defender against the pass. I would rather give up a shorter run than have a long pass completed.
CoachDino
October 25, 2021 at 05:14 pm
I don't have a strong opinion as it often depends on the match-ups of personnel and scheme but the issue isn't short runs, its very long runs.
PatrickGB
October 25, 2021 at 12:06 pm
Well, our run game is just coming off a bye so there is that. I imagine they are rested up and ready to go. Dillon might be in the doghouse for his fumbles and I imagine that he really wants to make up for it. Jones will be a threat in the run and pass game and just might shock the Cards who will not expect that.
scullyitsme
October 25, 2021 at 12:25 pm
I’m not sure how we where supposed to run more when our online was getting manhandled. We didn’t run much in this game because we couldn’t, and it was obvious early. Do what you have to do to get the W. This game it was the pass.
Thegravedigger
October 25, 2021 at 11:01 pm
thank you for stating the obvious. lots of fans calling for more runs, but the backs were running into brick walls. i get the idea of running more, and its gonna be the attempted game plan this week, but if its not working, you adjust.
Thegreatreynoldo
October 26, 2021 at 01:02 am
Yeeesssss. I don't know that it was that bad, though. In the first half, the runs were 9,3,1,2 and 3 yards (not counting ESB's 13 yard jet sweep or AR's 2 scrambles for 17 yards). That isn't great but there are no negative yardage plays. It seems like a pretty quick hook to me.
ImaPayne2
October 25, 2021 at 01:39 pm
I always compared Gary to Perry, two guys whose carrers I followed pre college and college being from Michigan Org.
Perry was a huge high school star from Michigan who thumbed his nose at U of M (go blue) and went to USC. He had a good career playing next to three future pro bowl defensemen who made him look better then he was.
Gary came to Michigan with a similar cant miss nominclature and was un impressive overall. He seemed to always miss the big games with a nagging little injury. He was lights out against a Rutgers but was lost against Ohio State or didnt play.
To me both are gold bricks who look good when they need to and for sure the contract year is when to shine to get da money. After that forget it. Your getting average jo from there on.
Both Perry and Gary were never rated as first round picks either. Both were considered second rounders and one was even and early third round steel.
Gary should have done ten times more than he has to date for being a 12 pick but like the analyst said, he lacks upper body power and bigger linemen can handle him.
He had a nice game against Washington, lets hope it continues and he doesnt go missing against Arizona. No one on our defense can keep up with Murry. He should have a very big run and pass day.
WestCoastPackerBacker
October 25, 2021 at 05:05 pm
Ranking 9th in total pressures indicates Gary is far above average and it's not a contract year for him. He was very young coming into the league, and much like Kenny Clark, had to grow into the game. I always thought it was a bit ridiculous to expect an impact from Gary right away give that they had the Smith Bros ahead of him and he was learning a new position. By his third year, Clark was having a real impact, same as Gary. As far as Perry, he was impactful in the two seasons where he was healthy and played in enough games to make an impact. His issue was injuries. Gary's been pretty available. Let's all hope Rashaan proves your comparison completely wrong. They don't look the same to me at all.
Since'61
October 25, 2021 at 01:57 pm
If the WFT game was pass heavy I'm expecting the Cardinals game to be run heavy based on the Cards run defense so far this season. The key issue is whether our OL can meet the challenge to sustain the ground game. Our OL was not effective blocking for the run against the WFT, although we still should have had more than 13 rush attempts.
The Cardinals defense is only allowing 16 PPG through their first 7 games. The Packers are averaging 18 PPG on defense since the Saints game. Adding in the Saints the PPG average moves up to 21 PPG. The defenses are pretty closely matched at this point. However the Cardinals offense is averaging 32 PPG while the Packers offense is averaging 24 PPG, but nearly 26 PPG since the Saints game.
IMO the packers would be wise to slow this game down with a run more/pass less approach. Hopefully wear down the Cards D and keep their offense off the field. We should take the ball if we win the toss and drive for a score to take the crowd out of the game early. If our defense hangs tough and we can control the game with our ground attack we can take this game and hand the Cardinals their first defeat of the season. They are due to stumble, it might as well come against us on TNF. GPG! Thanks, Since '61
Wisma Packer
October 25, 2021 at 03:40 pm
I like your strategy Since'61. May your words come true!
Thegravedigger
October 25, 2021 at 11:06 pm
they are most definitely going to try and run. that is a fact. but with adams and mvs most likely out, i would also say that the cards might put 8 in the box. if that happens, rodgers is going to start chuckin the rock, regardless of the play call. i hope to see alot of aaron jones, at back and wr. 2 back sets. slow it down, then flank the backs out. id imagine with 17 not playing that rodgers will throw to aaron jones a bit more.
Thegreatreynoldo
October 26, 2021 at 01:06 am
I agree with all of this.
Look for the Packers to promote JuWaan Winfree as a Covid replacement elevation if Adams can't play.
Swisch
October 25, 2021 at 04:04 pm
I sense that Rashan Gary is entering beast mode as a premier defender in the NFL.
I wouldn't be surprised if both him and Campbell make the pro bowl this season.
jurp
October 26, 2021 at 07:40 am
But wait! How can this be? All I've been hearing from certain members of this board is that Gary is terrible and a wasted draft pick? Do you mean that these guys are terrible, horrible analysts who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground?
MarkinMadison
October 25, 2021 at 08:32 pm
10 effing pressures. And without an elite player on the opposite end. That is just awesome. Gary haters. Own it.
Good thing that Lazard was found this week. Adams on the COVID list. Yeah. Arizona is not going to be fun without Adams. Rodgers might have to run the ball, or maybe even actually not throw the ball to Adams. Maybe.
Thegravedigger
October 25, 2021 at 11:07 pm
i bet davante gets at least 2 targets. while hes home in isolation.
dobber
October 26, 2021 at 08:01 am
It's Tuesday and I think he already has 4.
Savage57
October 26, 2021 at 07:22 am
The Packers got this.
I seent a stat they're 6-0 when playing without Adams, 27-6 with during LaFleur's tenure.