How Early Packers Could Take Each Position in 2026 NFL Draft

There are a lot of options for how the Packers could use their early picks.

Quarterback - Round 4

The Packers love to invest at QB, but with only two picks in the top 100,  they do not have the luxury of being able to use an early draft pick to do it this year.

This draft does not have their usual type on day two anyway, with only LSU’s Garrett Nussmeier (who is light with small hands) projected to go.

The first real option is probably Penn State’s Drew Allar (116th on the consensus big board) with there being various day three options who would suit them from there on.

Running back - Round 2

This is not to say they should draft a running back in round two. Frankly, it would not be a wise use of resources, with Josh Jacobs and former 3rd round pick MarShawn Lloyd representing two investments at a non-premium position.

But if they do want Mike Washington from Arkansas, who is 69th on the consensus board and was in on a 30 visit, they might have to, with their first two picks at 52 and 84.

It is more likely Green Bay adds a back on day three – Nick Singleton from Penn State seems very much their type –  but the team is indicating they are at least willing to draft one early by showing interest in Washington.

Wide receiver - Round 2

The Packers went big at receiver last year, with two of their first three picks spent there, but those two players, Matthew Golden and Savion Williams, are the only two under contract for 2027. Even if Christian Watson re-signs – which he surely will – that’s only three.

You can never have enough weapons, and after trading Dontayvion Wicks, Green Bay may be in the market for another. Prospects who could interest them as early include Louisville’s Chris Bell, Alabama’s Germie Bernard and Georgia State’s Ted Hurst, who has been in for a 30 visit.

Tight end - Round 3

Maybe there is a world where the Packers break from type a little bit on size and shock everyone by drafting Vanderbilt  speedster Eli Stowers in round two, but more likely the first serious option for them is Georgia’s Oscar Delp, who is 89th on the consensus board.

Other than that, there look to be plenty of their traditional type available on day three. With Tucker Kraft entrenched as one of the pillars of their offense, it makes more sense to use a pick later rather than earlier. One name to watch: Dallen Bentley from Utah.

Offensive tackle - Round 4

Usually the Packers would be happy to spend an early pick on a succession plan on the offensive line, as they have done in the past by drafting Jordan Morgan in round one to eventually take over from Rasheed Walker at left tackle.

But right now it does not seem they have a spot on the O-line where they could be looking for an off ramp. They are heavily invested in Morgan, Aaron Banks (whose contract is now harder to get out of next year following a restructure), Sean Rhyan, Anthony Belton and Zach Tom.

The prospects projected to go on day two are also not their usual flavor, which is experienced college left tackles. Their range likely starts in round four with Duke’s Brian Parker II, who has center flexibility, or Florida’s Austin Barber, an athletic player who could kick to guard.

Interior offensive line - Round 4

It is a similar story on the interior of the offensive line.

A surprise round two pick could be Georgia Tech’s Keylan Rutledge, a powerful guard who plays with a mean streak and is a great athlete, but drafting someone who has only ever played guard would be out of character for the Packers, although he did get center reps at the Senior Bowl.

After handing Rhyan an extension, they probably do not want to draft a ‘center only’, which is what most of the early center prospects appear to be. They are likely to be after versatile players on day three, such as Kentucky’s Jager Burton, who has experience at all three interior spots. 

Defensive tackle - Round 2

This class does not have as many Packers types at defensive tackle as they would probably like, but it is still a screaming long term need.

They brought Christen Miller from Georgia in for a 30 visit, and among their reported visitors so far he is the highest ranked on the consensus board (47th). He is a big man who moves well and has played in various spots on the defensive line.

Domonique Orange from Iowa State stands out as more of a pure nose tackle option, and he could also be in play in round two.

EDGE - Round 2

While it may not be the most obvious need, do not rule out the Packers adding another pass rusher early.

They have usually had three significant EDGE investments at once in Brian Gutekunst’s tenure, whether that be early draft picks or highly paid veterans. After trading away Rashan Gary they are down to two. Micah Parsons is set to miss multiple weeks to start the season due to his torn ACL.

That means right now, Barryn Sorrell is probably starting across from Lukas Van Ness, with Brenton Cox Jr. likely first off the bench, as Collin Oliver is not a three-down player. Van Ness made real strides last year, but it’s not certain he’ll be on the team two years from now.

Gabe Jacas from Illinois stands out as the best option if the Packers go EDGE early, as a run-through-your-face type of rusher. They also brought Romello Height from Texas Tech in for a visit, who is more undersized and explosive. He is ranked 75th on the consensus board. 

Linebacker - Round 2

Linebacker is also not a desperate need, but Zaire Franklin is not a long term solution next to Edgerrin Cooper, and this draft class is strong, with multiple players the Packers will probably like projected to go right in the range of their first pick at number 52 overall.

This includes Jacob Rodriguez from Texas Tech, Anthony Hill Jr. from Texas and Jake Golday from Cincinnati. They are three different flavors of linebacker, so it would depend on what type of player the Packers may be looking for.

Cornerback - Round 2

For Green Bay to take a corner in round two, they would likely need to trade up to snag one of Tennessee’s Colton Hood, South Carolina’s Brandon Cisse or San Diego State’s Chris Johnson if they fall close enough to their pick at 52. How likely that is remains to be seen.

If they miss out there, they should still have plenty of options in round three or four in a deep cornerback class, with Arkansas’s Julian Neal, Texas’s Malik Muhammad, Florida State’s Devin Moore, Georgia’s Daylen Everette and Texas A&M’s Will Lee III (another 30 visit) all of potential interest.

Safety - Round 7

In this exercise last year, I wrote: “To be honest, it would be a bit of a shock if the Packers drafted a safety at all”. They did not need one then, with Xavier McKinney, Evan Williams, Javon Bullard and Kitan Oladapo all on the roster, and that is still the case.

If a prospect catches their eye late, they could throw them into the room and see if they can fill out the back end of the depth chart, but safety is arguably last on Green Bay’s priority list.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (14)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
PackEyedOptimist's picture

April 13, 2026 at 10:03 am

This article assumes that no much-higher-rated-on-the-Packers-board player is there at 52.

If their #20 player on their board is available, they are going to take him, even if he is a safety. Well, more IDEALLY, they'd find a trade partner who REALLY wants that safety.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 13, 2026 at 10:15 am

Lololol. Point taken, PEO! Too good. That thought has crossed my mind.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 13, 2026 at 10:12 am

Aside from Safety and TE, it all depends on who the Packers are staring at with Pick #52.

There are cases to be made for RB or WR at 52. None of us knows their plans to see the Packers into a legit title run.

If they take DE, I’ll tip my cap to what I’d consider to be a Micah Parsons Approved selection. WR? The player must be THAT GOOD. RB? Again, I’m certain it wouldn’t be without a clear plan for 2026 to tandem with Jacobs in an offensive power shift. OG might figure in there as well. I have ZERO problem with the Packers adding a 6-5 330 destroyer to protect Love and open gaping holes for Jacobs and another RB with that #52. Same with the #84.

NT, CB - those are easy. Weighing the value per what is available is going to be key.

I could see the right CB, NT, LB be our 52 pick as much as any other.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 13, 2026 at 01:08 pm

"I have ZERO problem with the Packers adding a 6-5 330 destroyer to protect Love and open gaping holes for Jacobs and another RB with that #52."

They just did that last year when they drafted Anthony Belton in the 2nd round. So I'm thinking they shouldn't do it again this year. They need to see if Belton pans put.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 13, 2026 at 10:48 am

Qb rd 4
Go sign Russel Wilson.
RB - in 2
Mike Washington
Is a second prize.
WR - Rd 2
This works for me.
But not if his name isn’t
Hurst or Lance.
In fact; those gems have
Climbed.
I’d trade Reed. But with his injured past.
Gute might be stuck with him.
Te- rd 3
Oscar Delp would work.
But Just don’t see the pack
Taking Offense their first 3 picks.
Would I do it. YEs-
Rd 4 -Puts us at 153 -160
That is just to late for a quality OL
Project , maybe center? RT?
Defense - DL -Maybe
If you see Miller or Jackson.
No to orange.
Edge -
@52 Better trade up.
LB - Not happening early.
CB rd 2 -
No- I’m still a Stukes fan .I’m for a NB.
Long speed is my concern.
Demmings is rd 3 now.
Safety rd. 7
Maybe rd 2 if #7 leaves.
Will Kamarek TE OSU!

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 13, 2026 at 10:49 am

I’ve taken DTs (big ones with disruption potential as well), OLB and CBs and even an OL that’s too good to miss. Often a higher player drops at those positions, but if one doesn’t, trading back seems to lead to the best drafts.

There are a lot of CB options I’d be very happy with in rounds 2-5 and I typically take 2. There are fewer Edges I really like early or before day 3. If I take one it’s a player with the size to play the run, burst and bend. No more speed to power bull rushers!

I generally find that the drafts I am happiest with involve either a trade down or a dual role DT. To me, that is the hardest position to fill convincingly. Edge is either in round 2 or day 3. OL is rare early for similar reasons, after the early players (most often gone) there is real upside later at far less cost). No WR or RB excites me in round 2 or 3 comparatively to need or other talent.

Let this draft come to us. It’s one with talent that can help us if we don’t try to force it. DT, CB most likely, Edge and OL in exceptional circumstances. Trade back if we can absent a player we covet at those positions falling.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 13, 2026 at 11:08 am

Who are the Edges and CBs you like Cold? And where would you pick them?

I want the CB room built back up so bad that a month ago I would always pick a CB with our first pick, but always after a trade back for more picks. A move back usually gets a late 3rd or very early 4th back. I want starters or players that contribute a lot with Day 1 & 2 picks, period.

But I now think that if we draft an Edge with our first pick, maybe Jacas, Lawrence, Deni-Sutton, or Moore, we get a guy that will start right away because our Edge room after Parsons is all question marks. Players that have produced and played very little. There will be a ton of CBs we can take after #84 that can start for us, again because our CB room is bad.

Also Cold, what is your view on Caleb Banks, is he worth an early pick with his foot problems?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 13, 2026 at 02:07 pm

Caleb Banks comes under the heading of good enough that one shouldn’t pass. If Christian Miller was there, I might well go for him first, but, ultimately, truly disruptive run stuffers are rare to the point of taking Banks if he drops.

Of course, I do not have access to the medical expert assessments, so it would depend on that. Delay is one thing (after all, most of our possible alternative picks won’t start immediately), but congenital career-threatening assessment would change the equation sharply negative.

As to edges. We are going to play LVN, Sorrell and Cox alongside Parsons as is. Oliver likely spells Parsons. LVN is a pure strength/speed bull straight line rush. Sorrell is more hands technique and strength than pure burst, but he’s not rapid or particularly bendy. Cox is a smaller, more flexible, strength/burst type.

In other words they are all similar. They win by power and speed off the mark, not agility or change of direction. We need to be able to be more varied than that opposite or without parsons. We need agility and bend. The players you cite are more of the same essentially. We have seen how that works for enough years now. We have seen the missed QBs, the escaping.

If we are to draft OLB early it must be a player capable of holding up in the run game and also of mirroring Parsons/Oliver once behind the line. Of presenting a challenge that is different to Ts on both sides of the line. Malachi Lawrence is one of the few we might have a hope of early. The others will go 20 picks or so before that at least.

After that, they are mostly bull rush types till Max Llewellyn and Caden Curry, probably in the 5th. I do not like this edge rush class much after Lawrence. So that rules out all the ones you mentioned.

If I take a strength rusher, I would go with Landon Robinson on day 3, who is not much slower than Jacas and more explosive with better leverage and possibly change of direction (Jacas avoided testing) . He can play the run and rush inside if needed as well.

0 points
0
0
CheeseEdWest2's picture

April 13, 2026 at 03:22 pm

If the draft board is that strong, I could see GB wanting to take two corners, maybe Rd 2 and 4. It's a weak link.

0 points
0
0
Oxymoron 3339's picture

April 13, 2026 at 11:15 am

How Early Packers Could Take Each Position in 2026 NFL Draft?

I think you missed Kicker, Punter and Long Snapper.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 13, 2026 at 11:50 am

Hard to believe they could take a TE in round 3 but would not take an OL until round 4. Other than that, I basically agree with the author.

0 points
0
0
GreenandBold's picture

April 13, 2026 at 02:19 pm

Note to Gute . Draft a young man out of Wyoming nicknamed the Vanilla Gorilla . He’s a mauler and will bring a new attitude to the Packers OL .

0 points
0
0
gsd3's picture

April 13, 2026 at 03:28 pm

Don't care. If they like a guy and feel he can contribute, take him. F#%K the consensus "value".

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

April 13, 2026 at 09:06 pm

Thanks great analysis lot of work put in. I did take notice that Bernard was mentioned. He would be a steel imo. Best Bama receiver, good hands and route running. If he was available and we filled other needs I would jump on him. I think he will go quickly.

0 points
0
0