Packers 28 Bears 21 Game Balls & Lame Calls
The Packers hold off a late comeback from the Bears, and reclaim the inside track to the NFC North crown.
By Kalani Jones

What a game.
The Packers emerged victorious on Sunday, with what felt like the entire nation watching them. They've regained first place in the NFC North and still have a shot at the first seed in the NFC, along with the crucial first round bye and home field advantage that comes along with it. Green Bay has extended their winning streak to four games, their longest of the season.
Doesn't it feel like the Packers are starting to become he more level headed, battle tested team on the field, more often than not? Last season, even earlier this season, the Packers would frequently get in their own way. Do they still do that? Of course. But they are starting, slowly but surely, to become a team who is capable of winning these kinds of games. It's these contests that give you a sense of maturity behind Evan Williams' comments earlier this week, when he said "At our best we feel like we can beat any team in the league". It feels different than earlier this season, when Rasheed Walker declared that the team could go undefeated, and instead the team immediately fell on their face in Cleveland.
This team is battle tested, getting healthy, and in control of their own playoff destiny. And this game went a long way to proving that.
Game Balls
Josh Jacobs
Is it hyperbole to say that Josh Jacobs won us this game? Probably. But man, he felt like a superhero on the Packers' game winning drive. An eleven yard run to start the drive. 21 yard reception on a third and two. Seven yards on a toss play that looked DOA. He touched the ball on six out of eight plays, and gained 42 total yards along the way. He decided that the Packers weren't losing this game, and that was that.
The Offensive Line
For an area of the team that has received its fair share of scrutiny since the season began, the big boys up front really feel like they are starting to find themselves. The combination of Anthony Belton and Sean Rhyan playing out of position has the line looking... rejuvenated? Is that fair to say? Aaron Banks has also been playing his best ball of late, since healing up from the rash of injuries he began the season with. Jordan Love only took one sack in this game, which makes only four in Green Bay's last four games. Meanwhile, the rushing game looks capable of moving the ball consistently for the first time all season.
When Elgton Jenkins went down against Philly, I (and I know a few of you out there as well) thought it might have spelled doom for the Packers' post season chances. Instead, they've found a way to turn up the dial, and haven't been the overall negative unit that they were earlier. I give a ton of credit to these guys for pulling it together. We're going to learn a lot about this starting five next week, when they go up against the league leaders in sacks out in Denver. .
The Run Defense
Going into this game, the run defense was probably my biggest area of worry for Green Bay. Of course, it's been ineffective all season, but going up against the best rushing attack in the league meant that a huge amount of pressure was on them.
Was it a perfect night for the run defense? No. Especially on Chicago's first fourth quarter drive, which saw the Bears spend 8:32 over 17 plays, running the football up the Packers' gut. That drive almost felt like doom for Green Bay, with how exhausted the Packers were by the end of it. But you know what the defense still did, on that drive and all game long? They didn't allow the Bears any explosive runs. Over Chicago's 138 rushing yards, the Packers did not allow a single rush over nine yards. They forced the Bears to earn every single yard along the way. And when the game came down to its final plays, they shut down three runs in a row (including a hell of a play by Kingsley Enagbare to deny a first down), which set up the Bears' final fourth and one play. Late in the season, you've got to come up big when the moment is there, and the defense did just that on Sunday.
Lame Calls
The Refs
Look. I'm not usually a "take it out on the refs" kind of guy. I think that kind of thinking has been somewhat in regression in recent years, thanks to certain technologies and policies that the NFL has implemented. I also think that people are coming to terms with how hard it actually is to make those kind of snap judgment calls when superheroes are moving all around you in the blink of an eye.
That being said, what the hell was that?
Where to even start? A fumble that was called incomplete, even though it never hit the ground? Keisean Nixon gets a hand around his throat, but a penalty for getting it off him? Bears players in the Packers huddle. And of course, there is the offensive holding on Micah Parsons. Every. Single. Play.
Every team's got to deal with bad calls going against them. It's just a part of football at this point, and the Packers were luckily able to come away with the win anyway. In my opinion, the only way to fix reffing is to tear that entire institution down and rebuild it from the ground up. Use every technology you have. Remove the human element as much as possible. Make everything reviewable. Until that day, however, c'est la vie.
Keisean Nixon (until the last play)
Nixon had a hell of a tough day at the office. Until he was one of the heroes of the game.
He had one touchdown allowed, and was beat multiple times in coverage. The personal foul penalty, as I mentioned, should not have been called on him, but it's still a negative play that cost the Packers big, on the same drive he let another fifteen yards go. Of course, he also made the game winning play. So, you know.
Nixon has had, for the most part, a pretty damn good year in the outside CB spot. The Packers need more of the latter version of him moving forward, and less of the former.
Three and Out
-- Today's Phrase of the Game: "Old School Vs New". I don't mean that in the sense that there was anything old school about the teams out there tonight. These are two highly modern schemes on display from Matt LaFleur and Ben Johnson. They are both young coaches who represent a new, analytical view of the game. Is that a good thing? I'll let you decide for yourself.
But didn't this just feel like an old school game? It's been hit on a thousand times this week, but this was the first Packers-Bears game with any real stakes since 2013. And I found myself a bit... relieved at that? Has it been fun to beat up on the Bears this last decade? You bet. Will we continue to beat up on them moving forward? I hope so. But it feels so satisfying to do when the Bears actually have some skin in the game too.
Besides that, this matchup just had the feeling of an old school rivalry game. The chippiness. The tension between coaches. The cold weather in Lambeau. It just doesn't get any better than this.
-- Injuries: As far as I know at the writing of this article, the Packers only suffered one new injury in this game, an unfortunate concussion for Kristian Welch. We'll keep a close eye on his status for next week's game, and hope that he'll be good to go.
However, it's important to recognize how important that lack of injuries is.The Packers have already suffered a number of crucial injuries, including Tucker Kraft, Elgton Jenkins and Devonte Wyatt. If the Packers are going to bring the Lombardi back home to Titletown, keeping their best players on the field is obviously so, so crucial. They received a number of reinforcements in this game, and they've still got LVN, Savion Williams, and others on the way.
-- Next up for the Packers is a massive test, in the form of the AFC's #1 seed and the winners of eleven in a row: the Denver Broncos. Is it too early to start using the phrase Super Bowl preview around this matchup? The AFC as a whole looks extremely winnable, no matter what your feelings are on Broncos' QB Bo NIx. That defense is formidable. Is it as good as the unit that dragged Denver to a championship in 2015? We'll have to wait and see, but I do want to take a moment to point out one area in Green Bay's favor going into this game. The Broncos run the most blitz heavy, man coverage heavy, cover-0 oriented defense in the league. Guess who is the best quarterback in the league against the blitz and man coverage? That's right, its Jordan Alexander Love.
I'll be at that game in person, and I'll be cheering loud enough for all of you.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns!
__________________________




Comments (106)
jvole
December 08, 2025 at 07:37 am
The refs are worse than I remember, and I've said this before, but the raw dollar amount of legal gambling that is going on for every single statistic (e.g., Parsons sacks per game) has got me seriously worried. A ref doesn't need to fix a game to get a payday.
And Nixon was robbed but why walk over there? Just play on man.
Sean Rhyan has found a way to get paid. He is not always in the right or perfect spot, but if he get his mitts on someone, it is over.
Guam
December 08, 2025 at 07:57 am
Spot on comment about Sean Rhyan. Earlier this year I didn't see any way that Rhyan was going to get a second contract from the Packers and suddenly he seems to be their center of the future. I don't think he will be all that expensive to resign and he has played surprisingly well since replacing Jenkins.
Bitternotsour
December 08, 2025 at 08:34 am
Why would you think that Sean Rhyan wouldn't be expensive to re-sign? He is a proven starting G/C in a league desperate for quality lineman. Start crossing your fingers that Monk can play.
Guam
December 08, 2025 at 08:43 am
Rhyan was a barely adequate guard and is an average center. Average centers don't cost a bunch ($6 - $8MM AAV) and will certainly cost far less than the $20MM Jenkins is due to make next year.
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 09:38 am
Rhyan at G was a huge rollercoaster in game and from one game to the next. Curiously, even allowing for transition issues, he’s been much more consistent at C. He won’t be cheap in the sense of a rookie, but he shouldn’t be expensive in veteran terms as a never quite established starter, unless perhaps he really grows and we go all the way.
dobber
December 08, 2025 at 09:56 am
I don't think it's any surprise that the Packers are going to have to go looking for OL help this off-season. Tom, Belton, Jenkins, and Banks are starters under contract, but there's uncertainty with Jenkins in terms of his injury, quality of play, and contract. It's possible Jenkins looks much better playing between Belton and Banks than he does playing next to Rhyan/Morgan.
The Packers probably already have an idea on how they're going to engage the Jenkins--Rhyan--C situation this off-season. I suspect it could change meaningfully based on these last few games. If Rhyan balls out and looks like a higher ceiling guy (and not like a guy learning to play C) or suffers a serious injury, it's going to complicate things. I think an injury to Rhyan probably puts Tom at C and Kinnard at RT at this point.
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 10:08 am
I really do not see Jenkins back. He was not good and he looks to have lost something to injuries. I think they just let him walk by cutting him before the cap hurdle to start the season, and eat any injury settlement. They are not likely to pay him as scheduled based on his play this year and I don’t see him taking a drastic cut to compete at C or G. I think we take the cap and he gets a deal as a G with another team when healthy.
I think if Tom went down or was needed at C, we might now see Morgan at RT, since he’s supposedly now getting time there. Kinnard is really a G athletically, as the Eagles figured out. Morgan is a T but was just thrown in unprepared last time. I think next year we may see Glover back up RT. He looked to be progressing in the summer.
I have no idea what they are doing with or think of Monk. Perhaps he’s ready. If he’s not, I’m not going to count on him for next year either and Lecitus Smith may be our second best C now, from the PS.
T7Steve
December 08, 2025 at 12:12 pm
Jenkins could restructure and be the perfect 6th man for the remainder of his career/contact as he gets older. He knows the other teams/players and would be good to have in the room. That's why I was genuinely surprised that he didn't hit it out of the park at center. Maybe, (and that's a weak maybe) he was an improvement on Myers, but at least the team realized there was a problem last season and has tried to fix it.
SicSemperTyrannis
December 08, 2025 at 12:29 pm
Jordan Morgan plays better on the left side, seems foolish to try turning him into a RT. Keep him in the weight room until preseason.
EricTorkelson
December 08, 2025 at 04:39 pm
100% agree Coldworld and I have posted this before Jenkins is done in GB
13TimeChamps
December 08, 2025 at 10:12 am
"The Packers probably already have an idea on how they're going to engage the Jenkins--Rhyan--C situation this off-season."
As long as they don't come up with some goofy rotating them in and out, like they did with Rhyan at RG most of the year. Center is too important of a position. Besides, since they've stuck with their current five the past few games, the OL seems to be playing much better.
Next year, Morgan/Banks/Rhyan/Belton/Tom has the potential of being a pretty strong group. Sadly, I think Jenkins may have played his last game as a Packer. He's never seemed quite the same post injury and we have younger, cheaper options currently on the roster.
Bitternotsour
December 08, 2025 at 10:00 am
I'm not saying he's getting Aaron Banks money, but to think he's going to be a value proposition ignores what starting offensive linemen bring in free agency.
I would say Sean Rhyan is ascendant - and he'll be paid accordingly.
Leatherhead
December 08, 2025 at 10:14 am
John Runyan got $30M over three years.
When I look at Spotrac, the interior offensive linemen who were 4 year vets and interior offensive linemen in FA, I see a lot of guys getting over $5M/year, so I'd kind of see that as the floor, with $10M being more of a ceiling.
The cold, hard, solid decision is to resign Rhyan and part company with Jenkins.
GilThorp
December 08, 2025 at 11:38 am
I wonder if Rhyan would resign with the Packers. While he said all the right things publicly, I don't think he was happy when he was benched in favor of Morgan.
T7Steve
December 08, 2025 at 12:16 pm
If Rhyan wasn't unhappy being benched, he's in the wrong sport. Nobody likes to be or believes he should be replaced.
SicSemperTyrannis
December 08, 2025 at 12:32 pm
Rhyan for somewhere between 5 - 10 MM seems reasonable to me? Hopefully it's doable.
LLCHESTY
December 08, 2025 at 05:00 pm
"The cold, hard, solid decision is to resign Rhyan and part company with Jenkins."
In other words the opposite of what you were saying a month ago.
dblbogey
December 08, 2025 at 12:49 pm
Monk? LOL.
Gman1976
December 08, 2025 at 09:14 am
I didn't count, but I saw an offensive lineman's arm around his chest or neck numerous times and not one holding call?!
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 09:48 am
Apparently there has been only one call for holding Parsons all season (declined, as it happens, in week two). That’s pretty staggering.
I dislike blaming officials. Unless it’s a fail mary travesty that no replay can excuse, all I ask is that they be consistent and balanced. Yesterday however, that was not the case. The turnover that wasn’t was dubious, as was one of the calls on Nixon, but also in-play calls.
The worst for me were the overturn of the catch by Musgrave and the blatant neck pull in front of the official on Parsons. I see no conclusive proof on the former and, on the latter, I can’t think of a more blatant or play affecting hold. I’m glad LaFleur said the same publicly about the holding (not just that particular one.
The Musgrave catch probably irritates me even over the hold since it was a booth review, where there is zero excuse and the presumption is supposedly that if there is an iota of doubt, honor the on-field call.
Bitternotsour
December 08, 2025 at 10:01 am
It was not a good day for officiating yesterday throughout the NFL. The Ravens got jobbed. Absolutely jobbed. Other examples abounded.
T7Steve
December 08, 2025 at 12:19 pm
I haven't noticed because I only complain about the other team, but maybe our guys are getting away with allot of holding too. They drew the line when Banks put his hands to the face/neck though.
Packerlifer
December 10, 2025 at 01:59 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8olkxIyGW8
DoubleJ
December 08, 2025 at 07:42 am
This year it seems like every game the Packers are having to go against the refs as well as the opposing team. From blatantly obvious offensive holding that refs just ignore to things like Nixon getting choked and him being called for a penalty. Parson has only drawn a single offensive holding penalty all season (back in week 2) and that was declined as he got a sack. Otherwise we have seen him get tackled and there isn't a penalty. I just think that these refs don't see the game fast enough. There are 8 of them on the field but they miss things all the time. Jvole above said the bit about gambling, yes it is a conspiracy theory, but it feels like the NFL is trying to fix games for Vegas via officiating.
Packers0808
December 08, 2025 at 07:46 am
There was paly I think 3rd quarter where Parsons had 3 guys hanging on him like a curtain. What is with refs and their angst against calling holding at least once in a while for Parsons. Just a call here and there and the holding would lessen up!
Nobuttkiss
December 08, 2025 at 07:47 am
Fix.
When the Bears player first grabbed Nixon's throat, there was a ref was right there watching.
And how can a pass be called incomplete when it never touches the ground? You tell me.
Major Snafu
December 08, 2025 at 08:09 am
My wife was really p o'd about that. I told her it often happens they miss the original hit and only see the rebutal. The other penalty on him for the face mask was unmistakeable though.
DoubleJ
December 08, 2025 at 09:10 am
Sure the refs usually miss the instigator but in this case they saw Nixon swat at Burden's arm which means they HAD to see the hand around the neck. This game was so horribly officiated you had to think the NFL wanted this to be a close game. If this is called evenly the Bears are blown out.
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 09:53 am
While the retaliator does often get the punishment, when a player grabs another’s face or punches, that’s normally it (any escalating retaliation a second penalty). In this case there is no chance the official didn’t see the initial contact, so the call was flunked.
Llew
December 08, 2025 at 07:50 am
Thank you, Kalani, for giving the O-Line some love! I'm hoping some other writers do a little bit more of a deep dive this week. I don't think its any coincidence that the current winning streak coincides with the changes up front. Rhyan and Belton have been an upgrade and yesterday was their best yet. Its been a little frustrating reading about the Pack these past few weeks while I think the press is burying the lead. I think these two are the biggest reason for the offence clicking the way it has. I'll be interested to see the PFF grades...I thought Belton in particular had a really good game. Best part?....they're both going to get better.
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 09:56 am
The OL did pretty well, though the Bears DL isn’t great. However we still only managed 0.8 yards before contact compared to the Bears’ 2. I don’t know if that’s scheme mostly or in part, but there is some work to be done. There’s enough beef there that we should do better. We will have to next week.
egbertsouse
December 08, 2025 at 08:07 am
The run defense should not cget a game ball. It got dominated in the second half by the Bears O-line. It was only because whiz kid genius Ben Johnson decided to pass on the last play rather than run for the yard that the game didn’t go to OT. Reminded me of Pete Carroll blowing the Super Bowl by passing instead of handing off to MarShawn Lynch for the TD. Brilliant!
Razer
December 08, 2025 at 08:43 am
Totally accurate on our run defense and Ben Johnson being the smartest guy in the room. The Packers finally recognize that interior D-line is important. Gutekunst goes bargain shopping late in the season to try and find Howard Green's son
WestCoastPackerBacker
December 08, 2025 at 03:52 pm
Disagree that the score was a given if they ran it. GB held on 3rd and 1. CHI was unable to get a first down running 3 times so they tried the option. GB defenders sealed off the route for Caleb Williams to run it in and he underthrew the pass. Nixon read the play as the same one the Bears had run against Philly for a score the previous week. Evan Williams failed to cover the TE and Nixon made sure to cover him, thinking that’s where Williams would go with the ball.
EricTorkelson
December 08, 2025 at 04:44 pm
Packers defense held Chicago 15 yards under there season rushing average
Major Snafu
December 08, 2025 at 08:10 am
The one thing I noticed again and I may be wrong but teams come in seeing the films and Nixon is their goat. I'm sure the plan even before the game started was they were going to go to whomever Nixon is convering for the big play they needed. It didnt work this time.
Razer
December 08, 2025 at 08:48 am
Love Nixon but he gets goofy and puts himself ahead of the team. His physical talent is evident as the pick shows but he makes boneheaded mental mistakes. He needs to spend time with Leroy Butler for pro counseling.
murf7777
December 08, 2025 at 10:18 am
I’d really like to know what happened on that play. Watching closely, I’m not sure it was Nixon’s man, but he was wide open right away. A better QB like Love probably makes that throw. I suspect Caleb was indecisive about whether to run or pass, and by the time he decided, the window had closed and Nixon recovered to make the interception.
WestCoastPackerBacker
December 08, 2025 at 03:55 pm
Nixon said it was Evan Williams guy and Nixon saw the TE was left uncovered and figured that’s where the ball was going. So it was basically a broken play on D and Nixon saw what was needed.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 09:06 am
And you are correct you may be wrong.
Opponents are going to attack (for the most part) either Nixon or Valentine on boundary passes. And for the most part they would be wise to avoid Nixon. He just doesn't quit.
He's second in the NFL in passes defended at 16. And he will tackle you to the ground (58 tackles playing CB). And he's often around the ball with 3 TFLs, and INT and fumble recovery.
I like the growth of Valentine, but not as much as I enjoy the growth of Nixon. He learned how to play slot and now is learning how to play solid boundary CB.
Even when he has a long day...he's still there at the end competing like it is the first quarter. Great demeanor for a CB.
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 10:00 am
Avoid Nixon in the short game where he can face the QB particularly. He’s very good there and very physical. Deeper, avoid Valentine as he’s a natural cover type who is much more likely to stay with the WR and contest the catch point successfully.
Rebelgb
December 08, 2025 at 10:23 am
Spot on.
WestCoastPackerBacker
December 08, 2025 at 03:57 pm
It wasn’t Nixon’s guy. It was Evan Williams but Nixon saved the game when he saw the TE uncovered and moved to cover him.
Houndog
December 08, 2025 at 08:14 am
Great article, Kalani, and I'll touch on a couple spots.
Yes! This did seem different with Da Bears getting most of the press all week long, and it was crucial (as I saw it) that the Packers needed to win. Not just to shut up Ben Johnson, but to reestablish (or remind people of) the pecking order as well, two weeks from now will be equally as important, and maybe more!
I'm also happy to see you mention Enagbare, there have been times I've wondered if maybe the FO should consider re-signing him and trading away Gary's big contract? Let the thumbs-down begin on that one!
Guam
December 08, 2025 at 09:58 am
Same thought occurred to me Houndog - Enagbare is playing nearly as well as Gary at a small fraction of the price. With LVN, Cox, Sorrell and Oliver waiting in the wings, maybe signing Enabare to a reasonable contract and trading Gary after the season would be a good idea.
Leatherhead
December 08, 2025 at 10:17 am
Trading Gary is going to result in $20M in dead money. Better to keep him for one more year. I don't think Cox, Sorrell, or Oliver is at his level yet.
Packerpasty
December 08, 2025 at 11:24 am
No they aren't...everyone seems to want more out of Gary but he's really doing a pretty good job...the job that's being asked of him..
dblbogey
December 08, 2025 at 12:55 pm
Also, these people who say "trade him" don't seem to consider nobody else wants to pay $20 million year for a pretty average player.
GregC
December 08, 2025 at 08:31 am
Was Nixon that bad? In the Snap Counts article, TGR said that PFF credited Nixon with allowing 2 out of 5 completions in coverage for a total of 11 yards. One of them was a TD, but the coverage was tight. It was a great throw and catch and was basically indefensible.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 09:16 am
Nixon being 2nd in the NFL in passes defended surely had the attention of the bare D coaches before the game.
And with only 2 of 5 targets for 11 yards during the game...they avoided Nixon and he played rather well when they didn't.
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 10:19 am
Discipline aside, I thought that Nixon had a pretty good day. As usual, he’s best facing the QB and closer to the line of scrimmage. That’s the Bears O really. His coverage on the TD was very good and very unlucky. That was a throw that shouldn’t have been made really.
packerbackerjim
December 08, 2025 at 08:37 am
Game: Luke Musgrave had clutch receptions. Looking like a guy worthy of being drafted.
Lame: Valentine is so easily juked. Can the DB position coach work with him on that? Please.
Razer
December 08, 2025 at 08:51 am
Maybe Musgrave is tapping into his inner basketball player. He'll never be a physical element in this offense but if he elevates his competitive quotient he may become a poor man's Jimmy Graham.
TXCHEESE
December 08, 2025 at 08:39 am
Yes, Enagbare made a couple really key plays, love how he plays the game. However, I thought Gary did a good job of harassing Williams and keeping the edge against the Bears.
Really curious how Hafley plays his defense against the Bears in round 2. It's obvious when Williams gets pressured, his first inclination is to escape to the right. Early in his career, that was the MO on Josh Allen, and the Baltimores and KC's would often send safety help to that side of the field to restrict his throw/run options. Unless Williams learns how to play in the pocket, he's going to be another Russell Wilson who becomes ineffective once he loses a step. Hats off to him though, for making the plays and bringing his team back in to the game. However, THE BEARS STILL SUCK!
I know Nixon didn't have the best day at the office overall, but I love the way he competes. Buy that man as beer. He did a great job on that last play of staying in his zone and making the play.
Shout out to Reed as well. His return will only make the offense even more formidable.
packerbackerjim
December 08, 2025 at 08:53 am
Ben Johnson knows where to find the open spots in the Packers Zone D. Forcing Caleb to the left is harder to do but he is way less effective when he does .
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 09:36 am
Williams was as advertised. Some "wow!" passes but some real clunkers too. He won't beat you in an air war.
He is Houdini on the run...and better feet than Bobby Douglas. He runs so well behind that OL, the team strength. The 4th quarter was like Ali (Packer's D) doing the Rope a Dope vs Foreman (bares OL). But stupid bares decided to let Williams try to win the game so he threw a clunker to Nixon, who was in solid position.
Speaking of passing, Love launched some of the most beautiful passes I have witnessed in Lambeau Field. Reed and Watson have supercharged the offense with Love throwing pin point, arching, tight spiral passes.
Rebelgb
December 08, 2025 at 10:27 am
His arm seems stronger than I had thought and yes he is throwing some amazing balls. My Brother and I commented on a pass yesterday (throw to musgrave?) that sometimes his passes are "Aaron like"; just the sheer velocity and the tightness of the spiral. Love can also throw off his hip, something Aaron was and is the best at of all time.
Watching love the last 4 games its hard to see how any Packer fan can complain now about drafting the guy, he really is a mix of old school Gun Slinger aka Brett Favre and tight spiral ball magician Aaron Rodgers. Might as well make his jersey # 42.
GregC
December 08, 2025 at 01:15 pm
Maybe the complaints about his footwork can stop too. I never bought into that anyway. I mean, I thought it was only an occasional problem. Not a major issue at all. Favre and Rodgers had unconventional footwork as well.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 01:48 pm
And more and more Love shows the demeanor and leadership of Bart. Shares the credit. Cool and under control in critical moments.
packerbackerjim
December 08, 2025 at 11:59 am
Agreed on Love, But……he underthrows virtually all of his long passes.
SicSemperTyrannis
December 08, 2025 at 12:44 pm
He's not used to the speed. Keep #0 9 and 11 on the field and see him get in sync with them ...
GregC
December 08, 2025 at 01:23 pm
He underthrew a lot of deep balls in the first half of his first season as a starter. He improved after that. Maybe he's not quite where we want him to be, but he's close. It's hard to throw a deep pass with accuracy, and all QBs miss some of them. Also remember that a slight underthrow is better than a slight overthrow. If you overthrow it, it's incomplete every time. But a slight underthrow has a good chance of being caught or drawing a pass interference penalty on the defender.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 01:51 pm
Sure you are not confusing him with Caleb? He's as uncooked as raw beef making many throws, especially deep.
He can wow you with a great pass and an equally great whiff.
EricTorkelson
December 08, 2025 at 05:40 pm
Glad you had the Guts to say it packerbackerjim, Posters with Green gold glasses on dont want this spoken...I watched Loves tape all Loves long throws were short and thrown off his backfoot. Both long TD throws were almost contested when they shouldn't have been. The two long passes in 2nd half were way short one should have been picked. Im not saying I don't like Love I'm a fan, I share season tickets but Love had great protection yesterday he didn't need to throw off his backfoot...he played good but was not great...lets hope it doesn't hurt the team at the wrong time. IMHO
T7Steve
December 08, 2025 at 08:46 am
I would scoff at the earlier comments about the refs, but it looks like it's happening in all the games, not just the Packer games. I've always had a bad feeling about the NFL teaming up with the gaming industry. I was worried about the players, but now that I see it, it makes more sense if the refs try to control the spread. I thought 6½ was a little high but try as they might the Packers still covered anyway.
Razer
December 08, 2025 at 09:01 am
I agree that the refs show an unbalance on some of this stuff. When the NFL wants to alter the game they do this "point of emphasis" bullshit. I think that in their attempt to make this an offense league they are 'de-emphasizing' holding against pass rushers. Otherwise, guys like Parsons would elevate offensive holding to a large part of every series. That would be bad for business.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 10:01 am
And speaking of the gaming industry, another observation during the Chiefs/Texans game was watching Travis Kelsey flummoxed with passes to his breadbasket that "could" be described as intentional drops. They were that bad.
Maybe a certain billionaire singer he knows took the under on the pro bowl TE's game production?
AI concerns me deeply...but it must replace those scale tippers on Lambeau Field yesterday and elsewhere this season. I simply do not know what a catch is now. Or holding. The refs are just making so many dubious calls now and corruptly cover it up with confusing rulings. It will continue. Why would it stop, especially with $billions in play?
T7Steve
December 08, 2025 at 10:04 am
Was meaning to ask you about the crowd? Didn't seem to be too many Bear fans or at least they were quiet for the most part.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 10:13 am
Not as many bare fans as Ugly Purple fans. There were many bare fans there. But the home crowd was LOUD on defense.
Starrbrite
December 08, 2025 at 06:47 pm
It will not be long before a NBA-like betting scandal will make the front page headlines re the NFL. Money…what can you say…
dobber
December 08, 2025 at 08:56 am
"The combination of Anthony Belton and Sean Rhyan playing out of position has the line looking... rejuvenated? Is that fair to say?... Jordan Love only took one sack in this game"
Compared to Walker, who's played pretty much every snap, Rhyan and Belton are pretty fresh. They should have legs under them for the stretch run. Going to need them this week against Denver--the AFC's complement to the Packers, with the difference being that their pass rush gets home.
Jordan Love took one sack, but he's got a tendency for those "one sack" sacks to cost the Packers points. 2nd and 5 at Chicago's 38 and he drops 15 yards on the sack, leading to the INT and costing the Packers at least a FG attempt. Luckily, the Bears got nothing of the ensuing possession. I think Love has pretty good pocket presence, but sometimes he's trying to do too much.
Pass Defense--Caleb Williams was a dog throwing the ball most of the night. He needed late drives to salvage his stat line, but the Packers only allowed 3 receptions of over 17 yards and two of those were late in the game.
We complain about the holding calls--clearly the Packers are just going to need to find ways to get the rush home, anyway--but Williams was dead in the water multiple times and scooted away. Bo Nix is athletic, but not as fast as Willams. They'll catch him in those situations, but you'd better believe that Sean Payton is watching this film and noting what the Bears did against the Packers shell coverage late.
Micah Parsons--he gets a game ball for getting Enagbare a sack when he was being run off the rush but managed to give RT Darnell Wright a push off his line and open up the underneath route directly to Williams for the sack. Rewatch that play if you get a chance.
Nixon--needs to be smarter. Talk smack? OK, but don't trot halfway across the field after the play to engage in crap talk and contact. The refs can see that.
Ben Johnson--or should I say Matt Nagy 2.0--has his team believing they can win. They generally play their best ball in the first and fourth quarters, and last night it wasn't enough. He hasn't been able to run away from most teams and they play tight games where a single play going against you can cost you a win...he's mostly turned up aces so far, and that's ripe for regression. Trap game for them this week at home against the Browns with the rematch against the Packers coming up in two weeks. Is Cleveland good? Not on the whole, but their defensive front 7 is if their offense can get them breathers. They'll shut down the Bears' run and put the game in scattershot Williams' hands. If the Browns can find a way to score in the 20s, they'll beat the Bears.
All that said, the Bears get 3 of their final 4 at home (while the Packers and Lions play 3 of 4 on the road) with two divisional games, a game against a Browns team with a lame duck coach, and a road game against an SF team who will also be playing for a spot in the playoffs. Last night wasn't a must win for the Packers, but they needed at least a split with the Bears and having that one in hand is a big deal. The Lions can be the Packers' best friends at this point with that final week game in Chicago.
Starrbrite
December 08, 2025 at 06:51 pm
Great post Dobby. Your Nix/Williams comp is what I believe also.
harleycops
December 08, 2025 at 08:57 am
Everything I was going to say was said above. But Nixon, gosh that guy drives me nuts. He's got to keep his head when attacked by a dagum rookie. The flag should've been on Burden's chokehold. How refs can't see something 2 ft in front of their face is beyond me. Nixon was the dog of the game, but came out as the rescue dog on the int in the end zone. The other good news is minimal injuries after this dogfight game. Keep healing up for the final leg of the season which won't be easy. Get everyone back and win out! That should keep Johnson's mouth shut until next year.
Oh, by the way......Da'Bears still suck!
GVPacker
December 08, 2025 at 08:58 am
Listening to Kevin Burkhardt & Tom Brady call the game sure makes me long for the Joe Buck & Troy Aikman years, Brady's voice Is super annoying!
mrtundra
December 08, 2025 at 09:01 am
100%, Brady is annoying!
NFLfan
December 08, 2025 at 01:22 pm
Agree-but the grate of Chris Collingsworth's voice requires an immediate volume turn-down
brenner
December 08, 2025 at 02:21 pm
I'm sorry but NOTHING will make me wish for Aikman and Buck to call the packers game again... Not until Monday Night Football gets the call for a Superbowl game
Starrbrite
December 08, 2025 at 06:58 pm
I’ll take Cowboy homer Ache-Man long before Brady, the, “I’m incredibly more important to the world and NFL than any mere human.” Collingsworth is equally annoying.
mrtundra
December 08, 2025 at 08:59 am
Did anyone here mention how the refs never threw a flag, on the Bears, for holding Parsons, on every defensive snap? It's hard enough for a team to beat another team, in this league, but when you have to beat the refs, as well, that is patently unfair.
I agree on the Rhyan comments. He has deserved to start at Center, for a few weeks now. Give it to him and continue to develop Monk, there.
I think Nixon has been playing well at CB for us, for a while. There have been times when he has been beaten, there, but who else on this team has not been beaten, at their position? He made some mental errors yesterday and MLF yelled at him, once as he came off the field, for it. He was a hero of the game with that game winning INT. Corral his headspace issues and let him play.
Josh Jacobs is a stud. Watson is everything I hoped he would be at WR.
On to Denver. GO PACK, GO!!!
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 09:43 am
We need to recall Nixon came to the Packers with scant experience playing slot or CB. Now he does both well.
He's an amazing football player. His tackling is outstanding too...Hafley's focus on vision and break to the ball and get it on the ground has found a willing student in Nixon.
Ferrari-Driver
December 08, 2025 at 09:16 am
I just realized that the Bears Head Coach's initials are BJ...yup old Blow Job Johnson. I'm sure hope Matt had a little smirk on his face during that lightning handshake.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 01:58 pm
It appeared Matt quickly strolled past Benny with barely a handshake and didn't even look at him.
NFLfan
December 08, 2025 at 09:28 am
Iv'e always enjoyed Nixon's heart and doggedness but it's unfair to call him a CB #1 and expect him to play that role. He is doing his best but he costs the team as much as he saves it. And, he needs some counseling re: his hot-head-'Straight outta Compton' style.
He's a CB#2. I do relish his heart, though.
Watson's play was pure beauty.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 09:45 am
Yeah, I wish Nixon could have won the game for the Packers by collecting an INT in the end zone.
Maybe he will do it in the Rockies.
dobber
December 08, 2025 at 10:04 am
He'll get exposed playing a lot of man coverage, but he's good in zone and plays physically in run support. That's just who he is. For what the Packers are paying him, he's been a good return on his contract.
That said, the Packers will be drafting more than one CB in the spring.
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 10:24 am
I also think it’s almost prototypically what Hafley wanted in a corner. Hobbs is almost a Nixon lookalike on paper. Hopefully, Hafley is now coming to value coverage skills more. Valentine has contributed greatly to keeping our secondary afloat. One Nixon type on the boundary may be a good thing but two on the perimeter is just too vulnerable.
WD
December 08, 2025 at 09:53 am
Is Van Ness expected to be back in time for the playoffs? Anyone?
Coldworld
December 08, 2025 at 10:29 am
I’d bet IR is more likely than this week, but they are keeping that one firmly under wraps. I suspect that the next reinforcement would probably be Cox who is now entering week two of practicing.
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 09:54 am
"They didn't allow the Bears any explosive runs."
That bodes well for the next 7 games.
pantz_bURp
December 08, 2025 at 09:56 am
Now, Coach Johnson is getting too much flack. He called a play with options built-in and Caleb made the ultimate decision.
Nowww, I lead a sheltered existence and unfortunately need and rely on others to make my existence spicey. Sooo, letz hope that da Bears somehow get ol' #12 (now #8) on their roster. Could you imagine the smartest guy in the room Coach and the smartest guy in the room Player coexisting?
What theater! Imagine if you will, lean in brothers and sisters. Packers vs Bears for the NFC title next season.
Love ya (some more than others),
Pantzy meeting you Here
BuckyBadger
December 08, 2025 at 10:18 am
Of course it is better to beat the Bears when the game means something. Hardly any fun beating team whose only hope it to play spoiler. Doesn't hurt them when they lose. Yesterdays game made the windy city moan and it was music to my ears.
Stinky Cheese
December 08, 2025 at 12:23 pm
Good game, fudgepackers. The city didn't moan, we know we are ahead of schedule and came one play and a 2 point conversion from beating you. It's funny reading all your comments of grand delusion. CW is in year 2 of what was a disaster in year one. He will be the best QB in the North by the end of next year. There will likely be many more good games between these rivals in the years to come. Congrats on the W. See you in 2 weeks
pantz_bURp
December 08, 2025 at 01:24 pm
No worries Stinky. I remember when I had my first full can of beer too.
In two weeks, your going down like fat kid on a well greased, metal-runnered toboGGan. ;)
Peace,
Pantz
BuckyBadger
December 08, 2025 at 02:16 pm
I would say grand delusion would be saying a QB that can't complete 55% of his passes will morph into one of the best in the league. Chicago swung and missed again. Could have had Mahomes instead of Trubisky and you could have had Maye instead of Caleb.
Stinky Cheese
December 08, 2025 at 05:03 pm
Time discovers Truth. I didn't say best in the league, I said the North. We will see :)
LambeauPlain
December 08, 2025 at 02:51 pm
More bare hot air...Interestingly, there was not much of the gas being belched out yesterday by the windies of flatland. They were kind of a quiet bunch.
Williams is currently the 23rd rated QB with a % completion that is the 5th worst in the entire NFL. Those are the primary reasons he didn't get it done yesterday. I doubt he's going to be better than Love ...or Goff...or even JJ McCarthy next December.
But then you seem knowledgeable about "grand delusion".
Stinky Cheese
December 08, 2025 at 05:08 pm
All coachable and easy fixes. Cherry-picking stats is lazy. He is developing and is only going to get better :)
Would you like to see what the league would say if you were starting a franchise today, would you take JLO or CW?
CW's ceiling is higher.
WestCoastPackerBacker
December 08, 2025 at 04:09 pm
Just sitting here happy the Bears passed on Drake Maye. Unless Williams miraculously turns into a pocket passer, his impact will run out as his legs age or he takes some big hits.
Stinky Cheese
December 08, 2025 at 05:12 pm
Silly Packers fans. JLO is not AROD or even Favre. Half his game is throwing a 50/50 ball. He is good, but not special.
WestCoastPackerBacker
December 08, 2025 at 05:24 pm
Silly Stink. Love is 4th in passer rating and 2nd in ESPN’s QBR this season. I’m okay with that. He’s proving to be pretty elite on efficiency and with the long ball. Now that he’s got his two best receivers back the offense is operating at a better consistency.
canadapacker
December 08, 2025 at 02:00 pm
Agree with this mostly - especially the Nixon penalty - but I think that he has gotten this from his reputation and he has also taken some dumb PI penalties in other games
As I posted during the game - #1 seems to get held around the neck almost every time he tries to get to the QB
I am not a fan of what our offense does to our defense to start the second half - too many 3 and outs. And some seemingly dumb ones. I mean someone other than Doubs is open and Love throws the long ball. To start the second half and if the D gives up a long grinding series - it behooves the offense to make sure that they run a whole bunch of time consuming drives to let the D catch their wind and scheme it up.
The referees do not know what a catch is or isnt - that TD in the Ravens game - how can a player knock the ball out of the receivers hands when he is about to hold it up celebrating a catch and it is called no catch - and in our game Musgrave had complete control and the tip was on the ground and the Bears receiver had the ball wrestled away from him and it didnt touch the ground when Green bay had it on his body.
I bet you that there are some bettors on these games pretty pissed off.
Ihappydirt
December 08, 2025 at 05:25 pm
If they call the PI on Doubs, it's not a 3-and-out, js.
canadapacker
December 08, 2025 at 06:00 pm
Yes you are correct but according to many there was an open man. But I dont like this whole mantra of going long on 3rd and short - especially to start the 2nd half - we dont need 3 and outs.
WestCoastPackerBacker
December 08, 2025 at 04:14 pm
Where is that doom and gloom lady who only sees the negative? Haven’t seen a comment by her during this win streak.
THESZOTMAN1
December 08, 2025 at 04:59 pm
All good points, Kalini: BUT a couple caveats:
Playing well "more often than not" does describe our O-Line play. But it's not a prescription for a deep playoff run.
Saying the run defense was "perfect." Did you watch the 2nd half?
Player quotes would be better left unsaid. Just supply billboard material for opponents.
But you're spot on about uncoming Denver game. Not a Must Win, but a victory would give us a boost and tell us we can beat a very good (the best?) AFC team.
But 1st, let's beat da Bears. Again.
The Szotman
CanPackFan
December 08, 2025 at 06:10 pm
Lame - Just TERRIBLE OFFICIATING! I've never seen so much holding that wasn't called and strange calls around roughing and turnovers. You'd think the league would put a better crew on for such an important/ game of the week?
Lame - GBs first 2 second half offensive series - both 3 and out. They allowed their defense to get gassed in the second half. Poor play selection on both drives.
Game - The Oline is coming together. I've loved watching Rhyan and Belton getting better each week.