Packers Snap Counts: Week 16 Vs. The Saints

The Packers activated Luke Musgrave. He took the last spot on the 53-man roster. The Packers elevated Safety Omar Brown from the practice squad. Quay Walker. Jaire Alexander, Bullard, Javon Bullard and Evan Williams were inactive due to injury. Heath and Monk were healthy scratches.
OFFENSIVE LINE:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Rhyan | 69 | 100 | 6/29% |
| Myers | 69 | 100 | 6/29% |
| Jenkins | 60 | 87 | |
| Walker | 60 | 87 | 6/29% |
| Tom | 60 | 87 | 6/29% |
| Telfort | 9 | 13 | 6/29% |
| Glover | 9 | 13 | 6/29% |
| Dillard | 9 | 13 | 6/29% |
The offensive line did a good job pass blocking. They allowed 3 quarterback hits but no sacks. Love had enough time in general. The run blocking was pretty good, though there were some breakdowns. Each one of the running backs each broke tackles or made someone miss just to get back to the line of scrimmage. That said, the Packers gained 188 yards on 39 carries for a 4.82-yard average. It was 191 yards on 36 carries for 5.31-yard average if one omits the three kneel downs at the end of the game. The Packers were successful converting third (and fourth) and short situations, once by Love and twice by Kraft. Kudos to LaFleur for going for it on fourth down on the Packers second possession of the game, which ended up as a touchdown. That put the Packers up 14-0 and the Packers never looked back.
QUARTERBACKS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Love | 60 | 87 | |
| Willis | 9 | 13 |
Love completed 16 of 28 (57.14%) for 182 yards with 1 touchdown and no interceptions. He finished with a 88.7 passer rating. He rushed once for 2 yards on a successful sneak. Love completed 12 of 18 (66.67%) for 127 yards and a touchdown in the first half, good for a 105.6 passer rating. He cooled off in the second half, completing just 4 of 10 for 55 yards. Malik Wills looked sharp. He completed a 34-yard rocket to Reed with perfect placement and timing in mop up duty.
RUNNING BACKS:
| Players | Snaps | % | Routes | STs |
| Jacobs | 28 | 41 | 11 | |
| Wilson | 25 | 36 | 8 | |
| Brooks | 22 | 32 | 9 | 11/52% |
All of the running backs looked good. They all broke tackles and/or made people miss. Josh Jacobs finished with 69 yards on 13 carries for a 5.31-yard average. He had a rushing touchdown and a 20-yard long. Jacobs also caught all 4 of his targets for 38 yards. He is such a weapon. Emanuel Wilson gained 52 yards on 11 carries (4.73-yard average) and Brooks gained23 yards on 6 carries. Brooks also caught a pass for 2 yards. These three players constitute a really good running back room. [All routes run information in this article is from Pro Football Focus.]
TIGHT ENDS:
| Player | Snaps | % | Routes | ST |
| Kraft | 43 | 62 | 19 | 6/29% |
| Fitzpatrick | 26 | 38 | 7 | 1/5% |
| Sims | 13 | 19 | 2 | 1/5% |
| Musgrave | 8 | 12 | 6 |
Kraft caught 3 of his 4 targets for 63 yards with a long of 30. Kraft also carried the ball once for 2 yards, converting a 4th down opportunity. Sims and Fitzpatrick had no targets. Musgrave had 1 target as the Packers eased him back into the flow of things after his long injury. Musgrave generally replaced Kraft rather than ?Sims or Fitzpatrick. I do not believe Kraft and Musgrave were on the field at the same time in a two tight end set.
WIDE RECEIVERS:
| Player | Snaps | % | Routes | ST |
| Doubs | 46 | 67 | 25 | |
| Wicks | 42 | 61 | 16 | |
| Reed | 40 | 58 | 25 | 4/19% |
| Watson | 30 | 43 | 13 | |
| Melton | 22 | 32 | 6 | 11/52% |
Reed caught 3 of 4 targets for 76 yards with a long of 37. He also carried the ball once for 5 yards. Doubs caught 2 of 3 targets for 30 yards. Wicks caught 3 of his 7 targets for 13 yards and 1 touchdown. Watson and Melton each had 1 target but no receptions. Love threw the pass to Melton into the dirt even though he was open. Watson was open a few times. Melton carried the ball once for 14 yards and Watson gained 23 yards on 2 carries. Watson was injured when the tackler fell on his leg. Much of the damage was done on the ground in this game.
DEFENSIVE TACKLES:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Brooks | 29 | 52 | 4/19% |
| Wyatt | 22 | 39 | |
| Wooden | 22 | 39 | |
| Clark | 20 | 36 | |
| Slaton | 17 | 30 | 6/29% |
Wyatt had 4 tackles (3 solo) including 2 tackles for loss. He had 2 quarterback hits and a sack off a twist. Per Gen Stats, Wyatt had 3 pressures on 14 pass rushing chances. Clark had 2 tackles (1 solo). Wooden had an assisted tackle and he was flagged once. Slaton and Brooks had no defensive statistics, but Brooks had at least one pressure. The Saints gained just 67 yards on 20 carries for a 3.4-yard average. There was a good interior push when the Saints tried to pass, which really helped the Edge players. This was very good complementary football.
As a note, the referees really seemed to be letting them play, especially after the Packers got a substantial lead. There were some egregious holds that were not called. I would note an obvious hold against Cooper in the 2nd quarter, a hold against Clark, a really obvious hold against Brooks on the pass Zayne Anderson ended up intercepting, and I lost count of the times the officials sat on their hands while Gary was being held. Here is a clip of the hold on Brooks.
The announcers mentioned the issues with the Saints' offensive line. Rookie LT Taliese Fuaga looks pretty good. Center Erik McCoy is an absolute beast, but he got hurt and left the game after just 7 snaps. RG/OC Cesar Ruiz is a good veteran. RT Trevor Penning, the 19th pick in the 2002 draft, has been a little underwhelming. He is a good run blocker but is less than adequate as a pass blocker. What the announcers meant was that the Saints were playing Lucas Patrick at LG, and it got worse on their interior when McCoy left the game. Give credit to the line for taking advantage of the opportunity.
DEFENSIVE ENDS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Cox | 26 | 46 | 5/24% |
| Enagbare | 25 | 45 | 7/33% |
| Gary | 24 | 43 | |
| Mosby | 19 | 34 | 125/71% |
| Van Ness | 18 | 32 | 11/52% |
Gary had 2 tackles ( 1 solo) and a fumble recovery. Van Ness had a solo tackle and a quarterback hit. Enagbare and Mosby each had 1 assisted tackle (and Mosby added another tackle on special teams). Cox had 2 solo tackles, including a tackle for loss, a sack, and 2 quarterback hits. According to Next Gen Stats, Cox led the Packers with 6 pressures. Lucas Van Ness had 5 pressures and Gary had 4 pressures. Next Gen indicated that the Packers got pressure on Rattler on 52.6% of his pass attempts, with no less than eight different defensive linemen (DEs and DTs) getting at least 1 pressure against the Saints, not to mention pressures by the linebackers and defensive backs.
LINEBACKERS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Er Wilson | 56 | 100 | 15/71% |
| Cooper | 39 | 70 | 4/19% |
| McDuffie | 21 | 38 | 3/14% |
| Hopper | 8 | 14 | 9/33% |
Edgerrin Cooper filled the stat line (again). His speed and hard hitting jumped out. He had 8 tackles (6 solo) tackles, 1 tackles for loss, multiple pressures. He lived in the backfield. Cooper again had 2 additional tackles on special teams. Eric Wilson had 8 tackles (3 solo). McDuffie and Hopper had no statistics.
DEFENSIVE BACKS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Valentine | 51 | 91 | 4/19% |
| Anderson | 48 | 86 | 10/48% |
| Nixon | 48 | 86 | 1/5% |
| McKinney | 43 | 77 | 6/29% |
| Stokes | 35 | 52 | |
| Ballentine | 23 | 41 | 9/43% |
| Olapado | 15 | 27 | 5/24% |
| Brown | 8 | 14 | 6/29% |
| Rochell | 9/43% |
Nixon has 3 solo tackles with a sack and a forced fumble. Valentine also had 3 solo tackles and his own forced fumble, though that rolled harmlessly out of bounds. Zayne Anderson had 3 tackles (2 solo), 2 passes defensed including an interception. McKinney had 2 solo tackles and a pass defensed.
SPECIAL TEAMS:
McManus made a 55-yard field goal, a 46-yarder, and all 4 of his extra points. Whelan punted twice for a 46-yard gross average and 36 net.
RB: 1.09
TE: 1.30
WR: 2.61
DT: 1.96
DE: 2.00
LB: 2.21
DB: 4.84
Photo courtesy of Mark Hoffman, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________




Comments (34)
GregC
December 24, 2024 at 07:36 am
I thought the Saints defense would put up more resistance than it did. They had been good in the red zone, but that didn't matter to the Packers. They were really dominant on those first three drives. The game was pretty much over at 21-0.
The three big issues that people talked about before the bye were interceptions, drops, and penalties, and the Packers cleaned up every one of those issues after the bye. Maybe we could add red zone offense to the list of concerns that has also been addressed. That little flip to Wicks at the 1-yard-line that lost a yard was an ugly play, but I was fine with them trying something different, and I liked that they went right back to Wicks for the easy TD on the next play. (The acting job by the Saints' DB, trying to get a pass interference call, was hilarious.)
I'm loving the new Packers identity as a power running team that can usually get a yard or two for a first down or TD when needed. The performances of Chris Brooks and Emmanuel Wilson made me think that Marshawn Lloyd's season is over. Unless one of the top three RBs gets injured, there will be no need to put a rookie RB with a history of fumbling on the field during a playoff run.
Luke Musgrave looked out of place. I'm not sure how he fits into this team right now, but maybe they can figure out a limited role in which he will occasionally be useful. I think the one target he got was that pass that was tipped high in the air and should've been intercepted by that big #50.
Malik Willis was really sharp coming in cold off the bench. It's good to know we have that guy. What a world of difference there is between him and most of the other backup QBs the Packers have trotted out in recent years.
Before Preston Smith got traded away, I was wondering if they were ready to give up on Cox. In the preseason, he seemed to be neck-and-neck with Aron Moseby for a roster spot, but now that they are both on the team, it is very clear that Cox is much more of a force.
I agree with TGR that in spite of only three sacks, the pressure was good. I noticed Rashan Gary getting a good push on most of his rushes. When the Packers are on offense, Jordan Love is usually able to sidestep the pressure without taking his eyes off the action downfield, while in the past couple games, opposing QBs have had to deal with a collapsing pocket and usually no escape route.
I missed Quay Walker on that throw that went over the outstretched arms of Eric Wilson. Walker would've gotten a hand on that one.
So far Zayne Anderson looks like a really good backup safety even though he is not as physical as Evan Williams. What a pleasant surprise he has been. Few people expected him to even make the roster, and supposedly he only did so because of his special teams play.
murf7777
December 24, 2024 at 07:50 am
“I'm loving the new Packers identify as a power running team that can usually get a yard or two for a first down or TD when needed.“.
With their new weapon Tucker Kraft! I could see a play where they do this in the playoffs and fake the run with Tucker making a pass to Love for a big gain.
Getting a couple yards when needed can be the difference of winning or losing in the playoffs.
Guam
December 24, 2024 at 08:09 am
Really good post GregC. Agree with every single point including the second down "cutesy" flip to Wicks on the goal line. Could have lived without seeing that play. If you are a power rushing team (and the Packers are), run the damn ball straight ahead near the goal line.
Coldworld
December 24, 2024 at 08:31 am
Anderson is interesting. He had ball skills and is a good athlete (mid 8s RAS) with good agility. He played a fair amount of slot in college. He probably tested above expectations based on tape speed. The main knock on him was a lack of strength and a willowy build. That may be linked to the other big knock, durability. He missed a lot of games in college.
He’d payed a lot of STs in college and had been pigeonholed in the NFL as a result. If he’s added mass and functional strength, and he does seem more sturdy, he might just be a higher upside player than we have given him credit for. That would go some way to explaining why the Packers held on to him over a former late draft pick.
It was a pretty toothless opponent last night, but Anderson looked mentally and physically as if he belonged as opposed to a STer drafted in only due to emergencies. Maybe a find we all overlooked and a competent depth player.
Thegreatreynoldo
December 24, 2024 at 07:39 am
The Packers dominated the Saints. There is not much to do other than sit back and admire the work. The Saints defense is 16th in points allowed but 30th in yards allowed. That seems odd.
I was interested in Cam Jordan, the ancient one. He had 5 tackles (3 solo) and a tackle for loss. He is 35 and 14 NFL seasons probably take a toll. He looked alright, if not the really dominant force he used to be in his prime (3 time all-pro, 8 pro bowls, some votes for Def player of the year).
And got me to thinking about how the Saints handled the retirement of a HOF QB to whom they owed a fortune versus how the Packers handled moving on from Rodgers. The situations might differ significantly - I have heard that New Orleans is such a fun town that the Team can't afford to be bad lest they lose all their fans. I don't know about that. So, they are $63M over the cap for 2025 and they have already done some rounds of restructuring contracts. Jordan is probably a cap casualty for $11M or so in savings, and Derek Carr gets $40M in cash. They could cut him (if there is no injury guarantee involved) and save $30M and be done with his contract or they could restructure to save $32M.
LLCHESTY
December 24, 2024 at 08:24 am
Brees played his last year in 2020 and the most draft capital the Saints have used on a QB since then is a couple of 4ths for Ian Book and Jake Haener. Carr is a decent bridge QB but I doubt you'd find many GMs that think he could get you a ring. Mickey Loomis has been the GM since the early 2000s but I'd guess his time with the Saints is wrapping up and they'll finally do the house cleaning they should have started on 4 years ago.
LeotisHarris
December 24, 2024 at 10:46 am
Jordan played hard, and I felt for him in the second half. He looked plenty demoralized on the sidelines. Rizzi, too. That poor guy had the look of a man who just wants to get his kids back. I wonder when he last had a good night of sleep.
tobinrote
December 24, 2024 at 07:40 am
seems like the decision makers are a bit disappointed with 'van Ness as his snaps keep getting reduced. Not much to complain about in this game given how the Saints barely showed up. We did not miss Walker at all. That throw of Willis's was a thing of beauty, would that Love could be that accurate. We may have a first rate QB as the back up; the guy can just play.
GregC
December 24, 2024 at 08:53 am
That's been the biggest surprise about the aftermath of Preston Smith being traded away: fewer snaps for Van Ness, and Kingsley Enagbare being the starter and having the most increased workload. It's not a huge deal because there is heavy rotation, but it's not what one would have expected. I guess it's proof that they are not going to force a player into the starting lineup just because he's a first round pick.
13TimeChamps
December 24, 2024 at 11:15 am
What a great pickup Willis was. According to a certain QB guru on this site, he's not a legitimate NFL QB because he's unable to go through his progressions. Watching that replay, he looks to his left, then the middle before finding Reed down the right sideline. I believe that's called going through his progressions.
DoubleJ
December 24, 2024 at 11:53 am
I wonder if a QB needy team will try to trade for Willis before the draft. This year isn't a very good year for QBs so giving up a 2nd (I wouldn't trade him for less than that) to the Packers for Willis might make sense.
dobber
December 24, 2024 at 03:52 pm
I don't think anything happens until draft day or shortly after.
Racingdad
December 25, 2024 at 07:42 am
I’m with you in this - do not let Willis go for anything less than a second !!! My hope is that gb resigns him and keeps him long term
murf7777
December 24, 2024 at 07:45 am
YES, playoff bound once again. Awesome Game where they played great for all 4 quarters. This defense is excelling right now and over the past 7 games they’ve held opponents to 14-15 points per game. With an offense that has produced over 30 points 5 games in a row, this team is scary good at the right time. Kudo’s to Coach Mlf for always getting his team better in December when the pressure is on the most.
Could this be the year? Yes, if this defense can hold the top teams (Philly, Minny and Detroit) to under 24 because this offense has shown it will score 24+. Let’s go kick some Vikings ass!
Guam
December 24, 2024 at 08:31 am
The Packers are ready for their rematch with the Vikings. They played their first truly complete game against the Saints and will need every bit of that effort against Minnesota. The Packers have yet to beat a top tier team this year and Minnesota is their last chance before the post season.
Through 15 games the Viking's defense ranks #2 (18.4) in points allowed and #14 (335.8) in yards allowed. The Packer's defense ranks #6 (19.1) in points allowed and #7 (312.1) in yards allowed. The Vikings offense is #9 (26.4) in points scored and #12 (346.3) in yardage gained. The Packer's offense is #7 (27.4) in points scored and #4 (377.7) in yardage gained.
Statistically this is a pretty even match and both teams are playing well. GPG!!!
Coldworld
December 24, 2024 at 08:41 am
The complete game thing is a bit of a reach for me. The D did, the running game did. The O seized up though for most of the second half and we were playing a team devoid of threat in the air or on the ground. We did what we needed to do against a toothless opponent, which is all one can ask. That was not all that much of an ask though and, run aside, we were still disjointed on O.
We still seem to be far too committed to speculative long balls. I would argue that the offensive seizure started with us dropping the run and trying repeated long balls and didn’t really recover till Willis and the reappearance of Wilson and the run (though we did hit Reed on one long ball before that). Very little in the way of shorter and intermediate passing routes or targets except to RBs again.
Guam
December 24, 2024 at 09:02 am
I was disappointed that Love was inaccurate on those long balls, but I didn't mind the calls. At least the Packers didn't go into a too conservative offensive shell. Those shots downfield discourage teams from loading the box and stifling the Packer's rushing game so they serve a purpose.
MLF's play calls still cause me some concern. The Packers had a number of successful short passes to Jacobs in the first half and then those calls disappeared in the second half. Didn't see a change by the NO defense that caused those calls to go away either. And don't get me started on that goofy second down flip to Wicks at the goal line. The Packers are a power rushing team - go straight at the defense!
Leatherhead
December 24, 2024 at 11:17 am
I have a theory on those long balls......
A real benefit of those long heaves, even if they're incomplete, is that it keeps that idea in the heads of the DBs and DCs, and that makes other things work better, so maybe they're laying the groundwork for something later.
It's obvious that we're a power rushing team with a good offensive line, probably the best Packer Oline I've seen in 20 years. It's not just misdirection and unsustainable smoke and mirrors.....we actually have 300 lb men pushing people out of the way, and we have RBs who beat the first tackler routinely.
They really want Wicks to have some success. They're trying everything, like that goofy flip near the goal line when we'd be better off just horsing it in. Maybe it'll pay dividends. I remember Terrell Owens in a playoff game in 1998 dropping everything that hit him in the hands and yet, he ended up making the biggest catch of the game. Hoping that Wicks has the Mother Of All Big Games soon.
Oh, Guam, we've disagreed on the defense. I'll say that now, after 15 games, we are doing better than last year's defense. We have a game on the road against a playoff team with a good offense this weekend; I'm going to wait until after that before I crown them. We can shut down mediocre offenses...5 out of our last 6 games we've kept opponents under 20. But we're not going to be playing mediocre offenses in the playoffs.
Guam
December 24, 2024 at 11:56 am
I liked the Packers complete game against the Saints. The offense put 34 on an average Saints defense which was a pretty decent performance. The Packer defense was significantly aided by a decimated NO offense and that certainly was part of the reason for a zero on the scoreboard. I like this defense better than last year's. We can debate whether it was due to Hafley or the influx of rookie talent (Bullard, Williams and Cooper) or some combination thereof.
I think the Minnesota game will be a litmus test for the Packer postseason. If the Packers can't beat the Vikings (and will then have beaten none of the top tier NFC teams), that doesn't bode well for the playoffs. The defense is going to have to find ways to keep a lid on the Minnesota offense and they can't have a repeat of the first half of the first Minnesota game. We will see if they are up for the challenge.
I sure hope we get Alexander, Bullard and Williams back for that game. I don't want to see the Packers undermanned against a top offense.
Bitternotsour
December 24, 2024 at 12:53 pm
We don't need to debate, just appreciate. The defense is passing the eye test. My hope for the season was to get to the playoffs with a chance. Mission accomplished.
As for Alexander, Bullard and Williams. I'll be happy to see them at full strength week one of the playoffs.
Guam
December 24, 2024 at 01:45 pm
I dunno Bitter, this group likes to debate........
Williams pulled a quad in practice this week and LaFleur was quoted as "hoping we get him back for the playoffs". Fingers crossed.
Bitternotsour
December 24, 2024 at 04:53 pm
Debate is I suppose healthy. I object to denigration. Hell, I object to deification. Some fool on the site yesterday tried to compare Dan Campbell to Vince Lombardi. Dan Campbell is more reincarnated Rex Ryan than he is Vince Lombardi.
Since'61
December 24, 2024 at 09:22 am
Guam the Packers defense has actually allowed 274 points or 18.3 PPG. They are tied with the Chargers for #1 in points allowed by the defense. The Packers totals points allowed is 287 but 13 of those points were the result the 2 pick 6s which Love has thrown this season. The PAT was blocked after one of those pick 6s.
Now I don't know if the other top 5 defenses points allowed totals include any returns for TDs. But I don't count points against the defense when they are not on the field. The league rankings and stats should do the same.
Thanks, Since '61
Guam
December 24, 2024 at 09:58 am
Fair point Since'61 but the NFL database I use counts pick sixes against the defense. I knew about the Packer pick sixes, but don't know about pick sixes against other teams. The only fair comparison I could do was use the NFL database as is. I suspect many teams have a pick six against them, but the Packers are likely on the high side of that statistic with two pick sixes.
I think we can both agree the Packer defense is playing well this year.
Edit: Did a little research and there have been 26 pick sixes in the NFL year to date. That means each team has about .81 pick sixes or about 6 points counted against their defense ON AVERAGE. The Packers have 13 points counted against their defense this year.
Leatherhead
December 24, 2024 at 10:36 am
At pro-football-reference.com, at the bottom of the Summary for the season, they have a record of where the scores came from.
We're listed at 19.1, which is good for 6th best. If you deducted the 14 points it would put us at 273, or lowest total in the league. However, you'd also have to deducted 14 from Philadelphia, and 7 from Minnesota, which would put them at 269.
One shutout makes a pretty big difference, but at this point, after 15 games, we're clearly ahead of last years 350 points. If we gave up 40 in the next two games, we'd still only be around 325-330.
XXXXXXXXX
A cautionary note: Nobody, or no team, is ever as good, or as bad, as they look at any specific moment. I'd caution against taking too much away from last night....without Kamara and Carr, this is one of the weakest offenses in the league.
Next week, we play Minnesota. On the road, against a playoff team, just like the rest of our season (except the Bear game). If we can throttle Minnesota, that'll be a lot different than throttling the Saints at home.
I agree that points that are scored against the team when the defense is not on the field should not count against the defense. But.....that means that returning an interception for a TD doesn't count, but if they return it to the 5 and have first and goal, it does. That doesn't really seem right, either. And since it's a team game, points that are score against the team are what counts.
Since'61
December 24, 2024 at 02:46 pm
LH I agree with your points. However when comparing or ranking defense I think that only points allowed by the defense should used. Points allowed on returns should be counted as a team statistic.
I appreciate your research effort for the Philly and Vikings defenses. Bottom line is that our defense is in the top 5 in points allowed and the Packers defense hasn't been in that class for a long time. It's good to see with the playoffs approaching.
I don't think that we will throttle the Vikings on the road but if the Packers can play a solid game and come away with a win I think that it will show that the Packers can beat anybody in the playoffs. Thanks, Since '61
LLCHESTY
December 24, 2024 at 08:32 am
After Keisea Nixon signed his new deal if you had told me he'd be more valuable as a DB than as a returner I wouldn't have believed you but he's earning his money this year. He's playing the run aggressively and has been a real weapon on blitzes. Shout-out to Valentine and Stokes as well, they've been pretty stingy when it comes to outside completions the last couple weeks.
Coldworld
December 24, 2024 at 08:45 am
Nixon is best in the slot and we are better when he’s there. Stokes and Valentine have actually held up well on the on the outside over the last 5 games, though last night was not particularly busy for them. Nice to see Stokes making some solo tackles near the line last night.
Bitternotsour
December 24, 2024 at 09:13 am
imagine that, he's better when healthy than when playing at 80%
Leatherhead
December 24, 2024 at 10:53 am
I saw Stokes make tackles, too!! But I stand by my assertion that Stokes doesn't really like contact and avoids it when possible. Still, I can live with that if he covers people.
The CB room of Alexander, Stokes, Nixon, Valentine, Ballantine isn't a particularly strong group, especially when Often Injured Alexander isn't playing. Nonetheless, they've actually held up OK against our last several opponents.....who don't have particularly strong passing attacks.
GregC
December 24, 2024 at 09:20 am
Tom Silverstein said that Nixon is one of the most passionate players he's seen, and he's like that all the time. Not sure that's the word he used, but it was something like that. So I think a lot of what Nixon does is due to sheer determination, and he has some pretty impressive athletic skills to go with that attitude.
Leatherhead
December 24, 2024 at 10:53 am
He was our best CB in 2023. He had more snaps and more tackles than any other CB on the team. And so far this year, same story. He's 4th on the defense in tackles.
I think having a veteran who has been around the block, and who you can depend on showing up, counts for a lot.
Bitternotsour
December 24, 2024 at 11:05 am
Bisaccia, Nixon, and Jacobs. We're doing OK with Raider cast-offs.
Leatherhead
December 24, 2024 at 11:23 am
We focus on the draft, but several of the moves that have really helped this team didn't involve the draft. Jacobs, Nixon, Willis, McKinney....