Packers vs Bears: As the NFC North Should Be

The NFC North crown could be decided in the next three games

There are many major rivalries in pro sports. The NBA features Celtics vs. Lakers, MLB showcases Yankees vs. Red Sox, and the NHL presents Bruins vs. Canadiens. But perhaps the greatest in all of pro sports is the Green Bay Packers vs the Chicago Bears. The Packers own a 108-96-6 record over the Bears all-time. A significant part of that is due to the Packers' dominance in the rivalry over the last 30 years, with a record of 47-14. Many Packers' fans who are 40 years or younger can't recall the Bears ever dominating the rivalry; it's been all Packers. As a result of this, you get some mixed reactions from younger Packers fans when asked who their most-hated NFL team is. Many of them might gravitate towards the Vikings, given how competitive that rivalry has been in the same time span. Not to mention the Vikings' apparent obsession with signing former Packers players. 

If you ask a Vikings fan which team they hate the most, it's the Packers. If you ask a Lions fan, it's the Packers. And of course, if you ask a Bears fan, it's without question, the Packers. Even if Packers fans may have mixed answers between the Vikings or Bears, or maybe even the Lions, none of them will argue that the Bears are the Packers' biggest rival. The Vikings just have little brother syndrome while they try to do everything the Packers do and even take their players in an effort to remain just annoying enough. The Lions, come on, they might have a good team now, but they've barely been relevant since Barry Sanders lined up in their backfield. And even then, the Packers still got the best of them the majority of the time. 

When you look at the Packers/Bears rivalry, there's even bad blood that brewed between the founders and coaches. There was no love lost between Curly Lambeau and George Halas. When Vince Lombardi took over, despite having a respect for Halas as a person and competitor, Lombardi was not a fan of Papa Bear on the field of battle, often telling his players that they had to dislike everything about the Bears, even Halas as he stood on the goal line during warm-ups. Lombardi had "Beat the Bears" painted on all the blocking bags. Lombardi had an 11-3 record against the Vikings; needless to say, he couldn't have cared less about the new team in purple. 

When Clay Matthews revealed his "message from the president" at the NFL Draft, saying "The Bears Still Suck," I would imagine that somewhere up in football heaven, Vince Lombardi and Curly Lambeau had big smiles on their faces, while George Halas just stood nearby smirking and shaking his head.  

At the start of the 2025 season, many had the Packers and Lions battling atop the NFC North with the Vikings perhaps a scrappy third, but the Bears were thought to remain at the bottom, or maybe third if they got lucky. Not many predicted the Bears to be 9-3, a half a game on top of the NFC North after week 13.  Most fans felt that the Packers would be back on top of the North after the Black Friday match between the Bears and the Eagles, but the Bears pulled off an eye-opening 24-15 victory over the defending Super Bowl Champions in their own house. Suddenly, weeks 14 and 16 have a lot of significance with regard to the NFC North title. 

The Bears and Packers have had several games in the history of their rivalry that essentially decided the NFC North, or decided which team with reach the playoffs right at the end of the regular season. This year, the Packers will face the Vikings at the regular season closer, which, as of right now, will just have the Vikings trying to play spoiler. But one could call the two games between the Packers and Bears in the next three weeks the NFC North Championship. Granted, there are five games left, and performance in those other three games obviously matters, but the Packers getting a full game and a half up on the Bears with two wins would be a step in the right direction. 

Getting out in front

It all starts on Sunday, December 7th. The Packers are coming off the high of defeating the Detroit Lions on Thanksgiving in their stadium for the second time in three years. It was the first time this season the Packers were considered the underdogs. They rose to the challenge and feasted on turkey legs on Ford Field. The Bears are coming off the high of essentially stunning the league by beating the Eagles in their own stadium on Black Friday. Both teams have a lot of momentum going in their favor, and this game is about to be like two freight trains colliding in the middle of Lambeau Field. 

With the arrival of Ben Johnson, the Bears are making the move toward a more aggressive and smash-mouth approach on offense. They're running the ball well, and the Packers will need to keep that contained to pull off the victory. On Thanksgiving, the Packers unfortunately lost DL Devonte Wyatt for the season to an ankle injury. It was thought that when Wyatt was absent early in the season, Green Bay's defense just didn't function as dominantly as it should have. So, they now have a long road ahead. 

If they wish to contain the Bears' running attack, players like Nazir Stackhouse, Warren Brinson, and Karl Brooks are going to have to step up in the middle of the defensive line. Perhaps the best defense in this situation may be a good offense. If the offense can score points and get out to an early lead, it could force the Bears to abandon the run. That's when the Packers' potent pass rush comes in handy. 

Packers fans may hate the Bears, but many will agree that there is no other team they'd rather have these meaningful battles against each season than Chicago. As long as the Packers keep winning, of course. 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (59)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
gsd3's picture

November 30, 2025 at 06:22 am

Like him or hate him, Johnson is building something. The north will go to the winner of these games. No worse than a 3 seed and a home playoff game.
Hoping Gute gets a serviceable DT in now so he has some time to absorb the Hafley D. If the bears can run the ball like they did on Philly, there won't be the down and distance to unleash Parsons.
This is the season. Fingers crossed.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 09:47 am

They said the same things several years ago when Matt Nagy came in and looked like a wunderkind in his first year...virtually everything broke right for that team. They bought Khalil Mack. They forced a crap-ton of TOs and scored a bunch of defensive TDs.

Two words, "Double doink!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BICgLiBy46o
(watch the Bear mascot under the uprights)

Teams rise and fall. There are plenty of one-year surges. The Bears right now are looking like the 2022 Vikings: winning a lot of one-possession and lower-scoring games....which is ripe for regression. We can't deny that they're winning games. We'll have to see if how they're winning is sustainable.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

November 30, 2025 at 11:34 am

I LOVE the double doink!!!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 11:52 am

In that year when everything was going right for the Bears and almost nothing was working for the Packers, the double doink and the bear mascot falling over was a heart-warming moment that sustained me until September.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

December 01, 2025 at 01:13 am

It truly was amazing.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

December 01, 2025 at 01:27 pm

Not to mention the Bears, along with Indy and the Pats have one of the easiest schedules, against teams like the Saints, Ravens, Comanders and Steelers with backup QBs. The next 5 games will tell us where the Bears are.

0 points
0
0
jvole's picture

November 30, 2025 at 07:17 am

I wonder if having Parsons as a linebacker on 1st and 2nd down would help against the run? He's so fast that he could do a delayed blitz, if needed, but otherwise his ability to chase down RBs could be effective. The bears running game was pretty impressive against the Eagles.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 30, 2025 at 07:35 am

Parsons is only slightly faster than Walker or Cooper (4.39 versus 4.52 and 4.51 respectively). Why replace either Cooper or Walker with Parsons when you keep more speed on the field by playing all three with Parsons at DE? Now if Parsons is replacing McDuffie, that is a different matter.

0 points
0
0
jvole's picture

November 30, 2025 at 12:39 pm

If there is any "weakness" to Parson's game as a defensive end it's in shedding blocks on run plays. But he then of course, runs backs down from behind...just a wow-making machine (thank you Jerry).

Anyways, I think he often just can't see the play happening or he can't generate enough power at the point of attack because the people in front of him are often 4-5 inches taller and 50-60 lbs heavier. But if he's back from the line he might be able to diagnose and penetrate.

After Wyatt was out last time, the D dropped off so much...I'm sure Hafley's thinking of creative ways to avoid this from happening again.

0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

November 30, 2025 at 03:04 pm

"Parsons is only slightly faster than Walker or Cooper (4.39 versus 4.52 and 4.51 respectively)."

That is more than slightly faster in the NFL. Slightly faster would be 4.47 vs 4.52/1. I agree that in nickel I wouldn't have him at LB instead of Walker or Cooper. However, in base I could see him at OLB with Gary and LVN at DE.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 30, 2025 at 10:58 pm

You do realize that the difference is about one tenth of a second. A player who runs the 40 in 4.4 seconds covers about 9 yards in a second and less than one yard in a tenth of a second. That is essentially one stride difference over 40 yards. I'll stick with "slightly faster".

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 01, 2025 at 09:55 am

Really, it comes down to burst of speed since you’re not normally running 40 yards as a LB or EDGE. First 10 yards would be most important.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

December 01, 2025 at 10:35 am

Spot on Murf. I think football "mental acuity" and the ability to quickly process information and translate that into quick physical movement (burst) are far more important than timed speed in the 40. Some players have that in a big way (Parsons) and others less so (Walker).

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 30, 2025 at 08:35 am

Parsons played about 90% of the snaps last game..

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 30, 2025 at 05:22 pm

Relentlessly!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 09:49 am

Most defenses--and LB--are going to struggle against the run if they can't keep OL out of the second level. If your DL isn't up to the task, you need to force the issue by committing LBs and Ss more aggressively.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

November 30, 2025 at 08:02 am

The sweetest victories are against the Bears. There’s the pleasure in the Packer victory with great big dollop of schadenfreude on top. Delicious!

The Vikings and Lions are buzzing flies. It’s a relief to swat one down, but they’re just minor annoyances.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 30, 2025 at 08:43 am

Hopper tested in the 4.6s at the combine but low 4.5s at his pro day. Gutekunst has also mentioned that the team also tested him in the 4.5s. From what I’ve seen, that appears to be more representative. Jamon Johnson had a 4.50 at his pro day too (4.6 at the combine). Welch did not get a public test at draft time.

At his pro day, McDuffie actually ran a 4.59. So he’s not slow, but it’s straight line speed. He struggles with short area change of direction. That suggested he’s good down hill, but has issues in coverage, which has been the case.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 09:37 am

I think the bottom line is that McDuffie has played well in his extended play time, and either teams really haven't tried to exploit him or the Packers have done a good job of hiding him in coverage.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 30, 2025 at 10:09 am

This is a league where QBs complete 70% of their passes. If they throw 6 passes at McDuffie, they're supposed to complete at least 4 of them. That would be average.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 11:55 am

Nobody told me there'd be math...

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

November 30, 2025 at 10:50 pm

Thankfully it's just the grade school variety.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 01, 2025 at 06:47 am

He has played well Dobber, but In this little spell he hasn’t faced a team with both a capable QB and the weapons to exploit him (Goff was without LaPorta and St Brown) in the passing game. I think it’s that more than hiding.

The stars have aligned in that the games are ones where his strengths were key and his weaknesses largely non factors. I believe the Chicago games actually suit him just as favorably on paper and him them just as well.

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

November 30, 2025 at 08:05 am

"The vikings just have little brother syndrome while they try to do everything the Packers do and even take their players in an effort to remain just annoying enough." You hit that nail, on the head, Greg! The "Look what we've done" vikings are always looking for the notoriety the Packers-Bears rivalry has had, through out the history of the NFL. Without winning anything close to a Championship, they feel they need to be in the conversation, when it comes to being a great team. They just make me laugh!

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 30, 2025 at 08:40 am

I read what Dallas Goedert said about the Eagles loss to the Bears-'not doing their 1/11th, missing a tackle here, running a poor route there, poor linebacker support, 7 penalties, etc., AJ Brown 2 false starts...'

After watching Valentine miss tackles against Detroit, he will likely be targeted as one of the weak links.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 30, 2025 at 08:46 am

Giving up 200+ rushing yards and winning is a rare feat indeed.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 09:32 am

We can look at the Eagles game as a bellwether moment for the Bears (beating a winning team on the road) but the Eagles--who used to bully teams with their trench play on both sides--are scuffling offensively. In aggregate metrics, they're now bottom third in the league offensively and defensively. I don't know what's wrong with them because their personnel is still very good, but I suspect there's more brewing internally (we all heard AJ Brown's complaints) than we know.

The Bears are winning games. That's the bottom line. They're doing it by running the ball and propping up a QB who really isn't a world-beater. They're doing it by forcing TOs and limiting opponent TDs by (we've heard this before) limiting possessions and forcing opponents to try to string together plays, be methodical and mistake free, and beat them on the ground. Like McCarthy, Williams has been best on his first couple drives (scripted plays) and late in games (playing against prevents). They're just making key plays when they need them.

I still think the Lions are probably better than the Bears.

In the end, the Packers are going to likely use about the same game plan against Chicago that they did against Detroit. They are going to need to be aggressive against the Bears' run game--especially without Wyatt. They're going to need to force Williams to make plays from the pocket. One difference is that the Bears' LBs are beat up, and so the Packers may try to exploit them underneath, but the Packers need to throw the ball downfield without ignoring their own run game.

More than anything else, the Packers need to win +/-.

0 points
0
0
Stinky Cheese's picture

November 30, 2025 at 10:48 am

You could almost write the same thing about the Packers offense. The Bears' offense is the better of the two offenses. CW is progressing nicely and is right on track.

The Packers' defense is much better than the Bears' defense, and that's where they have the edge. It should be a good game. #FGB

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 12:05 pm

"You could almost write the same thing about the Packers offense."

I won't deny that.

"CW is progressing nicely and is right on track."

To quote LH above: this is a league where average QBs complete 2/3 of their passes. CW sits firmly at 58%...and has been closer to 50% than 66% percent in his last 6. He's made some clutch throws and some clutch runs.

As Bill Parcells said: you are who your record says you are. Whether people believe in them or not, the Bears have 9 wins.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 01, 2025 at 07:17 am

The Bears OL is much better than the Packers’ has been. Their QB is not. The Bears pass rush is not as good as that of the Packers. Williams’ best attribute is that he’s been hard to bring down. The Packers have done well at corralling those types of QB since Hafley.

The Bears have to win with the run and do so with speed. Our D is good against speed but struggles against power used consistently. The Bears aren’t obviously well set to exploit our corners deeper. Conversely, running on the Bears doesn’t look like a recipe to win games. Unlike Detroit, that’s not due to their potential to score points fast through the air, but the stoutness of their D.

So this is a game where our OL either plays much better in the run game or we need to take on the Bears strength in the secondary to put points on the board while holding their run game in check. This is a game where the best game plan and tactics likely makes a huge difference.

Like the Lions fans, I think the Bears people think they can run over us. I feared Montgomery might have given the chance. The Bears don’t have that type of threat. Take the run game away (including Williams) and then it’s up to us offensively to come out with a mindset more like that of last week than in the three games beforehand.

On paper I think the Bears don’t match up with us as well as they think unless we play into their hands through going back to insisting on setting up the pass game by running. It will be a good test of LaFleur and of Hafley’s ability to get Williams down in the back field while again containing the run. Similar to last week, but with a more mobile QB who is more dangerous on the move than in the pocket, and harder to bring down.

0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

November 30, 2025 at 03:10 pm

As the season has progressed CW has regressed.

0 points
0
0
NorthernFinn's picture

November 30, 2025 at 08:36 pm

#FTB

0 points
0
0
WorseWisconsin's picture

November 30, 2025 at 01:05 pm

"In aggregate metrics, they're now bottom third in the league offensively and defensively"

Well, I'll agree that the Eagles' offense performance is very uneven in '25; but they're top-8 in points given-up on D, so they're still pretty sturdy defensively where it matters most.

The packers scored 7 points against the Eagles D.
The Lions scored 9 points against the Eagles D.
The Bears scored 24 points against the Eagles D.

All 3 of those games were THIS month.

"Williams has been best on his first couple drives (scripted plays) and late in games (playing against prevents)."

1: Equating McCarthy and Williams is a laughably BS comparison.
2: Uh, did you watch the same game the rest of the NFL watched? The Bears were AHEAD of the eagles; that was no 'prevent' defense in that throw to Kmet.

A critique on William's completion percentage would be a fair take. But his 4th-quarter performance is no fluke.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

November 30, 2025 at 05:04 pm

First off, matchups are a thing in pro football.
You can’t just compare results vs. a common opponent and cone to insightful conclusions about how the variable teams will perform against one another.

Second.. riddle me this, Batman:

How many drops did the Bears and Detroit have vs. the Eagles?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 01, 2025 at 07:30 am

Williams didn’t win the game against the Eagles, pretty obviously. As to the Eagles, I’m not sure where they are going but they all look to be on the precipice of a meltdown. They may already have started to puddle.

Their win against the Packers was one that essentially stemmed from the Packers not taking the game to them on offense enough to enable one play to be the difference.

If LaFleur goes into the game with a similar plan, then Chicago might well win, but all this praise of your offense and particularly the passing game is self-hype run riot to this point.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

December 01, 2025 at 01:15 am

We own the Bears. If we don’t turn it over, we win. The End.

0 points
0
0
Bsantoro112's picture

November 30, 2025 at 09:53 am

Flying out Saturday for the game. Atmosphere is going to be ELECTRIC!

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 30, 2025 at 10:45 am

Most games are not won, they are lost. The Packers are playing some pretty clean football right now. The penalties, turnovers, dropped passes, etc. that dogged us the first half of the season are looking more like a distant memory.

Over this three game streak, not a single turnover. Very few penalties. Very few drops. The offense actually seems improved without Jenkins and Kraft, at least if you count on Points/Game. We're averaging 27 without them.

Rhyan has done a good job at Center replacing Jenkins. And Belton has had some encouraging moments as the RG. I think this configuration of Walker, Banks, Rhyan, Belton and Tom has been our best Oline so far.

You also have to factor in Watson's return. He's a big help in the run game, he certainly creates some space for other receivers, and he got targeted 22 times in this win streak. Three TDs.

This is what we are. Our RBs carry the load, and they're good at it. This combo of Jacobs and Wilson is one of the better 1-2 punches I can recall us having.. We have a WR by Committee where it might be Wicks, or Doubs, or Watson. Or maybe even Golden or Reed before the season is over. We throw 30 times/game, Love completes 20 of them. We don't turn it over. We aren't beating ourselves with penalties..

And we defend. Few teams get past 20. Half of them can't even get past 18. The primary feature of this defense is relentless pressure by waves of rushers, led by Parsons. We've sacrificed some run stoppers to achieve this.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 12:22 pm

" I think this configuration of Walker, Banks, Rhyan, Belton and Tom has been our best Oline so far."

Earlier I think you posted something to the extent of, "every starter you cut, you need to replace." Part of that dealt with whether or not to cut Jenkins and with the assumption that Rhyan would walk. Someone needs to snap the football.

My assertion is that they could cut (or trade) Jenkins, use his $20+M in cap savings to sign Rhyan to be C (if they like him and his attitude) to a deal that pushes his hit out beyond the Parsons/Love "balloon payment", and still have Jenkins $$ to use this offseason. Assuming Morgan is the heir-apparent at LT, that puts a starting OL in place for the next 2-3 years. I don't think Jenkins is washed, but if they like Belton at RG, is there a place for him?

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 30, 2025 at 12:48 pm

I like your assertion. I don't think Jenkins is washed, but he is 30, he is expensive, and he will miss half the season. I think that it is so costly to resign your own Olinemen, you almost have to plan on replacing two of your nine guys every year.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

November 30, 2025 at 10:57 pm

"Assuming Morgan is the heir-apparent at LT"

I really hope they don't assume that and draft a T in the 2nd round to compete with him. Or move Tom and let Morgan compete at RT with a high draft pick. A disaster at LT could really darken the '26 season.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 01, 2025 at 07:52 am

Morgan looked pretty good in preseason. There’s some reason to hope. He’s definitely not giving much reason to hope as a G. His failure to increase play strength is not a recommendation to me, but I concede, he was clearly being prepared to play LT only in the off season and summer.

Belton was almost exclusively prepared to play T, first RT and then left. I have my doubts about his balance and horizontal agility at T and certainly so without a radical technical jump. He looks like more of a G, at least initially. Now he is learning G on the fly. It’s not always pretty, but if it slows down he shows the potential to be a good one.

Coaching decisions are a big part of our OL experience this year. As to next year, if Walker does move on, we have only Glover and Brant Banks (who may have worthwhile upside) behind Morgan (Kinnard is a G athletically if he stays), so yes, we need to reinforce and foster genuine competition.

We also need to decide if Tom is really going to stay at RT in perpetuity or move to LT over the off season, which is normally where one wants one’s best T for a right handed QB. If that move is ever going to happen, this off season would appear to be the ideal opportunity to make it.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

December 01, 2025 at 10:06 pm

Wherever Belton ends up he needs to work on his balance through contact and consistently keeping his hands inside. Like Wahle showed with his hands inside if he gets latched on the defender is done but if his hands get outside the numbers he doesn't have the feet to reset and try again.

That breakdown he did of Rhyan a couple weeks ago was pretty interesting, shows some upside with the right coaching. He showed plays where his footwork was very good and then others where he clicked his heels and even a couple where he crossed over. That kind of leads back to what he's said over the last two years; that it's not one guy causing problems in the running game but various guys making mistakes in different parts of the game. That didn't occur as much under Steno.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 02, 2025 at 08:28 am

Stenavich was a good technical coach without doubt. The problem had been that when empowered to make decisions that standard had not been maintained and his personnel usage has been extremely dubious from the moment he got control and almost completely rejigged the OL that got us to the playoffs before a playoff game, with disastrous results. He’s also fell on his sword for that one, LaFleur seemingly just acquiesced. That’s continued ever since.

He’s also said he doesn’t get involved much with the OL now (since promotion). He’s also seemingly delegated as heavily to Butkus and LaFleur to him. The result is lack of growth, poor use of players, no improvement in the run game despite LaFleur openly moving to what had been intended to be a run led offense and changes in personnel type.

0 points
0
0
JQ's picture

November 30, 2025 at 11:01 am

"If the offense can score points and get out to an early lead, it could force the Bears to abandon the run. That's when the Packers' potent pass rush comes in handy."

Agreed!
I think for Green Bay, this game embodies, "Sometimes the best defense is a good offense."
Make the 'da bears play from a couple scores down, keep Caleb contained and force chicago to throw the ball.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

November 30, 2025 at 11:09 am

With this year's Bears - I am reminded of a quote from Satchel Paige - "Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you," Not only have the Bears gained on the Packers - they have headed them.

The Bears are in a prime position to act as spoilers in the NFC North - and perhaps beyond. The Eagles took them lightly - which resulted in their embarrassing loss. The same fate awaits the Packers - should their mindset be that they're playing the Eberflus Bears.

I view this Bears game as every much of a litmus test for the Packers as the Lions game. Consequently - should the Packers win - and assertively - it will confirm the Team as a legitimate SB contender. So another game of the year opportunity for the Packers.

0 points
0
0
WorseWisconsin's picture

November 30, 2025 at 02:09 pm

"The Bears are in a prime position to act as spoilers in the NFC North...I view this Bears game as every much of a litmus test for the Packers as the Lions game."

Great post.

While I'm rooting for the Bears in the next matchup, the Packers should win based on talent, home-field and recent (15 years) history of the packers dominating the matchup.

And of course, with the officials granting the packers retroactive timeouts, the Bears will have to play a perfect game to even have a shot of keeping it a single-score game.

But the 2018 comparisons I see fall apart in a few ways:

1: Ben Johnson has a track record of being a quality OC before becoming a HC. 'Captain Curl Route' Nagy wasn't even the playcaller in KC!

2: The '18 squad did get lucky in 1 way people here didn't mention: very few injuries to critical players. This '25 squad has been eviscerated by injuries on D. The game against the Eagles was the first game this season where the secondary was even partially healthy.

3: Caleb Williams is much more clutch and more talented at QB than either Trubisky or Fields. He's still a work-in-progress on completion percentages, but he hasn't had the luxury that Love had in holding a clipboard for 3 years while working on the weaknesses of his game. Williams will get better.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 01, 2025 at 10:09 am

Williams has more in common with Tru and Fields. None of them threw very accurately.

0 points
0
0
Brewcity_BearsFan's picture

November 30, 2025 at 11:42 am

Friday's win over the Eagles was the best the Bears have looked since they handily beat Dallas.

Chicago spent the first half of the season learning how not to lose. Now they look like a team, that believes it can win.

Caleb Williams is in his second season, and learning in real time. Love's second season he was holding a clip board. That isn't a shot, just highlighting the difference in organizational philosophy. In a year and a half, Williams will reset the QB market.

The team has bought into Johnson. People are seeing why he was as coveted as he was. This isn't Matt Nagy, who I think actually got a bad rap.

The Bears run game is legit. They dominated the LOS against an Eagles defense that had been pushing around most other teams. GB and Det combined, scored 16 points. It has been YEARS since a Fangio defense got run over the way the Eagles did on Friday.

I get the skepticism. Hell it reminds me of last summer, when Cub fans were shitting on the Brewers with much the same excuses. (Don't let my SN fool you, Bears aside, I despise all other Chicago teams).

At the start of the season, I thought they could at best contend for a WC. However, they are ahead of schedule under Johnson. With their opportunistic defense, and one of, if not the best rushing offense, they certainly can straight up win the division. Looking forward to a week from today, and the build up getting there.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 12:11 pm

"I get the skepticism. Hell it reminds me of last summer, when Cub fans were shitting on the Brewers with much the same excuses. (Don't let my SN fool you, Bears aside, I despise all other Chicago teams)."

I actually respect your opinions and the fact that you don't come in here trolling.
It's hard to argue with a lot of what you posted here.

Matt Nagy was undermined by a GM (Pace) who seemed to be more interested in flash (that kept him employed) than substance. I suspect he might be getting another chance to be a HC soon.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 30, 2025 at 01:45 pm

The Bears are not in hibernation. They have the Talent. Karl prevented the sweep last season. This Packer group dropped two winnable games @ Lambeau. There is no fear coming into cheeseland. LaFleur best have these
guys prepared and dialed in. The Bye should not be considered a vacation period.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 30, 2025 at 12:39 pm

Bares have better OL play vs the Packers 5, who still are not playing like a cohesive, synergistic unit.

I do believe the OL is playing better. The IOL has had few games together now and slowly improving...but Rhyan and Belton remain weak links in the chain. Banks is finally healthy. It shows.

The Packers OL seems to block consistently better on pass plays. Get off to a fast start and outscore the bares in the first half. Pass for first downs, move the chains, score.

Force the bares into passing in the 2nd half and let the Parsons and Co. pass rush go to work for three and outs and/or turnovers.

Then there are STs. Still seeking acceptance.

Are the bares on the rise or are the Eagles in decline? Bit of both?

A bit of both!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 30, 2025 at 01:01 pm

Something is amiss in Philly. Same thing happened in '23 when they went in the shitter down the stretch and lost something like 5 of their last 6...then took a one and done in the playoffs.

0 points
0
0
NitschkeFromTheGrave's picture

November 30, 2025 at 01:45 pm

Packers OWN the Bears... Win or lose that statement lives forever.

That said, The Pack wins next week !

GPG

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

November 30, 2025 at 01:46 pm

The loss of Wyatt (for the second time this season) does set back the packers defensive front overall, but the run defense will actually improve a decent amount.

Wyatt is not a run stopping DT, he’s a penetrating presence who is better at rushing the passer than playing the run.

If the offense has finally flipped the switch, the packers D is going to be playing from leads, and hopefully Hafley will be willing to send an extra body from time to time if the 4 man rush can’t disrupt the QB when their ears are pinned back, if need be.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

November 30, 2025 at 01:57 pm

I would also suggest that having someone like Nazir on the line in place of Wyatt could be a boon for the defense going against the Bears. They are winning games by clock control offense, not on the arm of their QB.

Beef up the run D, show Williams a ton of late safety rotation and combo coverages he’s not seen on film, and let our edge defenders take a few ticks off of Williams’ internal clock, and the Packers could really put the screws to the Bears.

I like how this is setting itself up. Always fun to watch the Bears gain some confidence and then slap them in the face with a green and gold reality check.

0 points
0
0
GBPfaninMO's picture

November 30, 2025 at 02:03 pm

It's like my Jr High PE coach used to say it's cut and dry boys keep the run game under REASONABLE control & make Caleb beat them

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

November 30, 2025 at 09:41 pm

Bears are now officially the number 1 team in the NFC with the Rams losing. I can say one thing, I thought Caleb was done and a bad pick. Lucky for him they got a coach who could take him aside and show him the little things he wasnt doing and how to stop trying to do it all running and passing himself.
We've all seen prospects going nowhere because the HC couldnt work with the guy and the game plan was just too complicated. They just faded away.

Congrats to the Bears for putting together a decent team via early draft picks, trades, and free agengy acquisitions for key positions. If anything, they are young, talented and not going away.

I have them slightly ahead of the packers talent wise. The Vikes are done until they get that QB they need then they will be right back in the fold because of a stellar defense and receivers.
The Lions are done. Poor GM management, loss of good coaches and too many dump decisions by Dan C. When your coach is costing you games your in trouble.

0 points
0
0
Gman1976's picture

December 01, 2025 at 09:47 pm

I grew up in the 60's hating the Bears. In the 70's & 80's, when we had losing seasons, beating the Bears made the world a better place. Then with Favre & Rodgers in the 90's until recently, we finally surpassed the Bears in wins, and the Bears became unbearable to watch. Their franchise with its ugly stadium sunk so low, I even felt sorry for them. Now, I no longer hate them. I respect them & want to beat them by at least 4 or 5 touchdowns. I just don't want the Pack to beat themselves.

0 points
0
0