Jonathan Ford vs. Nazir Stackhouse: Who Gets the Packers' Final Defensive Tackle Spot?
Which defensive lineman should the Packers keep?
By Dan Saia
Bottom of the roster training camp battles are often won far from the spotlight. While fans focus on quarterbacks, first-round picks, and high-profile veterans, some of the most important roster decisions occur at the back end of the depth chart. For the Green Bay Packers, there is an intriguing competition entering the 2026 season that may be more important than at first glance. That’s the battle between Jonathan Ford and Nazir Stackhouse for what could be the final defensive tackle spot on the 53-man roster.
With Green Bay transitioning into a 3-4 defensive front under defensive coordinator Jonathan Gannon, the importance of interior defensive line depth has never been greater. The Packers have invested heavily in the position this offseason, adding veteran Javon Hargrave, drafting Chris McClellan, and continuing to develop young players such as Warren Brinson. That leaves limited room for reserve defensive tackles, making every snap during training camp and the preseason critical.
The question becomes simple: Whose the best depth piece for Green Bay’s defensive line?
The Case for Nazir Stackhouse
Stackhouse enters camp with one significant advantage: familiarity with the current roster and coaching staff.
The former Georgia standout made Green Bay's opening-day roster as an undrafted rookie in 2025, extending the Packers' impressive streak of undrafted rookies making the team. He appeared in 13 games and recorded 12 tackles while serving primarily as a rotational run defender.
At 6-foot-4 and roughly 327 pounds, Stackhouse possesses the prototypical size teams seek in a traditional nose tackle. His college tape at Georgia showcased a player capable of occupying multiple blockers and creating opportunities for linebackers behind him. During the Bulldogs' national championship runs, Stackhouse developed a reputation as a reliable run stuffer rather than a flashy pass rusher.
That skill set could be particularly valuable in Gannon's defense. A true 3-4 front requires players who can anchor against the run and clog interior rushing lanes. While Green Bay added Hargrave to improve its interior pass rush, the defense still needs players willing to do the dirty work on early downs.
The organization also appears to value Stackhouse's developmental potential. Packers.com highlighted him as one of the team's intriguing second-year defensive linemen entering 2026 after he successfully earned a roster spot as a rookie.
Perhaps most importantly, Stackhouse has youth on his side. At just 24 years old, there is still room for growth. Teams are often more willing to keep a younger player with upside than a veteran whose ceiling is already known.
The Case for Jonathan Ford
If Stackhouse offers upside, Ford offers experience.
Originally drafted by Green Bay in the seventh round of the 2022 NFL Draft, Ford has taken an unconventional path back to the Packers. After spending time with the organization and later the Chicago Bears, he returned to Green Bay late in the 2025 season when injuries ravaged the position. He was then re-signed again this offseason.
Unlike Stackhouse, Ford has spent multiple years in NFL systems. He understands the demands of professional football and has proven he can stick around despite roster churn.
Ford also has something Stackhouse lacks: experience in multiple defensive schemes. That versatility could prove valuable when coaches are evaluating players for the final few roster spots.
The Packers' struggles against the run late in the 2025 season likely influenced their decision to bring Ford back. After allowing significant rushing production in several games, Green Bay searched for additional interior depth and viewed Ford as someone capable of helping stabilize the position.
There is also the reality that Ford has spent four years fighting for NFL opportunities. Players with that type of experience often enter camp understanding exactly what coaches want. They know how to prepare, how to maximize preseason snaps, and how to avoid costly mistakes.
When roster spots come down to minor details, experience matters.
Why Stackhouse Has the Edge
While both players have legitimate arguments, Stackhouse likely has the inside track.
Several offseason roster projections have included Stackhouse among the Packers' defensive tackle keepers while projecting Ford on the outside looking in. In these projections, Stackhouse is the sixth and final member of the defensive line group, leaving Ford either on the practice squad as additional depth or on the street.
The reasoning is understandable.
The Packers already know what Ford is. He is a dependable depth option capable of providing emergency snaps. There is value in that, but teams generally reserve final roster spots for players who could become more than backups.
Stackhouse still has that possibility.
The former Georgia defensive tackle was a productive college player who entered the NFL with a reputation as a run defender. While his rookie season was relatively quiet, young defensive linemen often take longer to develop than players at other positions. It is not uncommon for interior defenders to make significant leaps in Years 2 and 3 once they adjust to NFL strength and conditioning programs.
Additionally, Green Bay's current defensive tackle room already features several experienced players. Hargrave, Devonte Wyatt, and Karl Brooks provide a blend of veteran leadership and established production. That makes it easier for the Packers to carry a developmental player such as Stackhouse rather than prioritizing another veteran depth piece. Add in the fact that he is under contract for beyond just 2026 while players such as Wyatt and Brooks are in the final years of their deals and Green Bay will want that young cheap talent for 2027.
What Will Decide the Battle
The deciding factor may ultimately come down to one simple question: Who can stop the run?
The Packers struggled at times in that area during 2025, and the move to a 3-4 front only increases the need for reliable interior defenders. Coaches will closely evaluate which player consistently holds his ground at the point of attack, sheds blocks, and creates opportunities for linebackers such as Edgerrin Cooper and Zaire Franklin to make plays. If the Packers defense is going to take a step forward and really become a championship level unit in 2026, the run defense needs to improve.
Special teams could also become a factor. Players fighting for the final roster spots often need to contribute outside their primary position. Whichever player proves more valuable on field-goal units and other special-teams packages could gain a significant advantage.
Prediction
This competition should be one of the more closely watched battles during training camp, but Stackhouse enters as the favorite.
Ford's experience and familiarity with the organization make him a legitimate contender, and he could ultimately earn a practice-squad role if he fails to crack the initial 53-man roster. However, Green Bay has consistently shown a willingness to develop young defensive linemen, and Stackhouse's combination of size, youth, and upside fits what the Packers typically value in depth players.
Unless Ford clearly and undoubtedly outperforms him throughout camp and the preseason, expect Nazir Stackhouse to win the final defensive tackle spot and continue his development as a rotational run defender in Green Bay's evolving defensive front.
-Dan Saia




Comments (19)
Coldworld
June 25, 2026 at 10:13 am
Maybe both. Wyatt, McClellan, Hargrave and Brinson are all better playing next to a genuine NT on moved downs than being one. All of them are better versus the run than Brooks and as good or better as penetrating threats. That’s ignoring the possibility of Van Ness playing DE on passing downs. How many DE types do we need? It maybe that Brooks, in his last year of his contract and whose best year was his rookie season 3 years back, is the odd man out.
TKWorldWide
June 25, 2026 at 11:58 am
By “passing downs”, do you mean nickel? I am assuming that the nickel will have two edge rushers, like Van Ness and…whoever, early on. And in that same alignment it’ll most likely be Wyatt and Hargrave as 3-techs.
Or are you saying they might have LVN as a 3-tech in the nickel?
I think the only time they have a nose on the field is when they are in their 3-4 base.
Coldworld
June 25, 2026 at 05:44 pm
Call it what you will positionally, if teams run at us up the middle then we need to be able to stop them. The reality is that’s what happened last year and the non base fronts got rarer as teams just pounded. Sometimes one has to be able to stop the opponent’s agenda before one can impose ours. Once Parsons is back even more so. If they can run up the middle for 10+ play drives then the pass rush is marginalized anyway.
TKWorldWide
June 25, 2026 at 09:31 pm
Yeah I think mainly they just try to match personnel. 3 wides? Nickel. But I do think they have some pretty good front seven pieces, especially if Franklin can return to form.
GregC
June 25, 2026 at 01:41 pm
It seems unnecessary to keep two pure NTs when McClellan, Hargrave, and maybe Brinson can play that position at least some of the time--especially when the two pure NTs are marginal NFL talents. They can keep Stackhouse or Ford for short yardage situations and Brooks for rushing the passer. Brooks is not great, but he will give you more pass rush than Stackhouse or Ford.
Starrbrite
June 25, 2026 at 08:47 pm
That’s what I believe CW. Brooks may not be retained.
dobber
June 25, 2026 at 01:23 pm
I think this article actually does a pretty good job of summing up the situation. It might actually be painting Ford's chances as being a little better than they really are. Unless Stackhouse has been following the BJ Raji (post SB season) off-season workout plan, I think he's pretty securely ahead of Ford.
So as near as we can say in June, "locks": Hargrave, Wyatt, McClellan
Very likely: Brooks, Brinson
I think that Stackhouse is clearly the next guy, and Ford, et al., are behind him. It just comes down where Wyatt is in his recovery and how many guys they decide to keep.
TKWorldWide
June 25, 2026 at 01:36 pm
Yes. And in the 4-3, I think DT’s with some ability to rush the passer were at an advantage as to making the final 53. With the move to the 3-4 and a true nose, MAYBE a guy who can ONLY stuff the run has a chance.
dobber
June 25, 2026 at 01:54 pm
I think we're getting way too hung up on 4-3 vs. 3-4.
TKWorldWide
June 25, 2026 at 09:35 pm
Probably true. Nickel is really the base, and there’s no nose in nickel. Or probably they’ll sometimes shade a DT over the center. I think the main discussion here is if there is room on the 53 for a DT with zilch for pass rush if he’s a good enough run stuffer.
GregC
June 25, 2026 at 02:00 pm
Not mentioned in the article is the fact that Nazir Stackhouse was a healthy scratch for the last four meaningful games of the 2025 regular season--although he was active for the playoff game. He played 13 snaps in that game, compared to 17 for Jonathan Ford. So this contest is probably closer than the author portrays it to be.
dobber
June 25, 2026 at 02:12 pm
Yup: Stackhouse's snaps went to Jordon Riley down the stretch. Both Ford and Stackhouse played a lot for the Packers' JV against the Vikings in week 17 after Riley blew out his achilles.
I'll be happy to be wrong about Ford, so long as the defense finds a way to be stout--whether that means they bring in a tree stump or find a way to put opponents behind the chains by other means.
Coldworld
June 25, 2026 at 05:14 pm
Riley was worse than either in terms of run play. He did do better at collapsing the pocket. Realistically though, I’ve always liked Ford. He has plays where he just wreaks havoc. He’s got burst and strength. The problem is it’s one play in 15 or 20 that this happens on because the rest of the time he gets too upright and loses anchor/leverage and is stymied or simply moved. After a few years of this, I admit I’ve lost faith he can change that. Not hope, but belief. That’s a big shame, because he could be really good if he could win leverage even most of the time.
Leatherhead
June 25, 2026 at 04:40 pm
I like Stackhouse, but if the Packers liked him as much as I do, they wouldn't have signed Hargraves and drafted McClellan.
Coldworld
June 25, 2026 at 05:20 pm
Hargraves these days and McClellan are capable of being stout against the run for DEs but they are not NTs in the true sense. In base, both profile to DE, as does Brinson. Outside of Base, in effect it’s situational, but what they bring is disruption first not anchor. Had we wanted a true NT we could have gone Orange.
If you listen to why we didn’t, Gute isn’t focused on Stackhouse/Ford and their role but on increasing options to generate threat. I don’t know if that’s because he likes who he has at NT or if he continues to undervalue the ability to anchor robustly. I’m concerned it’s the latter and that it will cost us again. All the non base fronts and penetrative threat fall apart if teams can just drive us back relentlessly.
dobber
June 25, 2026 at 05:58 pm
The guy designing the D has changed. Hafley seemed to like going small and quick inside. Supposedly Gannon likes size.
golfpacker61
June 25, 2026 at 06:18 pm
Stackhouse is a completely different type of player than Hargrave or McClellan. Hopefully we can squeeze the last amount of football out of Hargrave this year, he is after all just a bridge, like Franklin. McClellan was always the DT pick in my mocks, he offers more than the one trick ponies like Stackhouse is.
Leatherhead
June 25, 2026 at 07:03 pm
They can call it whatever they want, but in the base we're going to have 3DL on the field, whether you want to call them DTs or DEs.
I agree that Stackhouse is different....he's a big horse in the A gap. It's hard to run against that half-ton pile he makes where the hole is supposed to be. But everything I see/hear indicates to me that we are prioritizing guys who can pressure the passer more than guys who can plug the run, so that works against Stackhouse.
Wyatt. Hargrave, Brooks are going to be the three main horses. If you add in Brinson and McClellan, that's 5 guys right there and probably as many as we'll dress. We'll average something like 2.5 DL on the field per snap.
When we go to the nickel, it'll be two DL (like Wyatt and Brooks), two DE/Edge (like Parsons and VanNess) the two linebackers (Cooper and Franklin), and our 5 man secondary.
MrFitz66
June 25, 2026 at 11:50 pm
I almost bought the Ford XXL 99 game jersery on Packers Pro Shop in the clearance section, because I liked the number. I fell asleep during the transaction. I'll get it this time around. Adios you Beat trader.