The Lass Word: Nothing Would Be Sweeter

Is it in them?

It’s hard to overstate the impact Micah Parsons had on the Green Bay Packers defense.  In just thirteen and a half games, he had already put himself in distinguished company.  His 12.5 sacks are the most by a Green Bay player since Za’Darius Smith had 13.5 in 2019.  Only eight players are listed in the record books as having more than 12.5 sacks in a season for the Packers.  They are Tim Harris (19.5 and 13.5), Reggie White (16 and 13), Aaron Kampman (16.5), Ezra Johnson (14.5), Tony Bennett (13.5 and 13.0), Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila (13.5 twice), Clay Matthews (13.5 and 13.0), and Za’Darius Smith (13.5). 

For some reason, which I don’t understand, quarterback sacks are only recognized from the 1982 season forward.  Even though game scorebooks  and preserved video can accurately document sacks in games and seasons well prior to that.  This means that the great Willie Davis, who had 13 sacks in 1962, and 14 in 1964, is not recognized.  Nor are Ezra Johnson’s 17.5 takedowns in 1978. 

The explanation from the league is that, because the NFL was not specifically keeping track of sacks prior to 1982, any sacks prior to that year are considered unofficial.   What makes that so bizarre, is that the league does list sacks on a quarterback’s record going back to 1963!  (though still unofficial)  This means that if Ray Nitschke sacked Chicago Bears quarterback Billy Wade in 1963, the sack would have counted on Wade’s record, but not on Nitschke’s.  Ridiculous. 

Anyway, I digress.  The point is, Micah Parsons was on his way to a historic year rushing the passer.  The sacks don’t even reflect the constant pressure he put on opposing signal callers, chasing them around the field, and forcing incompletions.  It is difficult to picture the Packers keeping the explosive Bears’ offense under control without Parsons, and without DeVonte Wyatt, who might have been the team’s best run stopper.  Even with Parsons, Green Bay’s ability to actually get to the passer was limited.  They managed just one sack against the Bears two weeks ago, and none against the Broncos last Sunday.The biggest disappointment by far has been Rashan Gary, who has gone seven games in a row without a sack.  That’s despite Parsons drawing double, and sometimes triple team blocking.   

It’s probably time to turn linebackers Edgerrin Cooper and Quay Walker loose as pass rushers.  There will be a price to pay for this, however.  Sending them to the quarterback will leave the short middle even more wide open than it has been in the past.  How many times have we seen opponents convert third downs by completing short passes over the middle?  Particularly to tight ends, and the Bears have two capable ones in Colston Loveland and Cole Kmet.  Also, if Caleb Williams escapes the pocket, as he is skilled at doing, that’s one less defender in his way if he tucks the ball and runs with it.  

In the end, Green Bay’s best chance to beat the Bears Saturday night is probably going to be to outscore them.  This means a redeeming effort from the offensive line, which melted before the Broncos pass rush in the fourth quarter last week.  Josh Jacobs will have to have a big day running the ball, setting up some play action passes.  As of this writing, the status of Christian Watson was still uncertain.  His ability to stretch the Chicago secondary would be a huge asset.   

There is a need here for a new hero to emerge.  This would be a perfect time for first round pick Matthew Golden to announce his arrival.  Or for Luke Musgrave to finally have a big game.  Or for Romeo Doubs to reclaim his grip on the title of being go-to guy in the red zone. 

Somebody on defense is going to have to take the ball away.  I’m looking at you, Xavier McKinney.  The rangy safety hasn’t had a pick since November 2 against Carolina. 

Am I the only one that is shocked the Packers are actually favored in this game?  The latest line has them at minus 1.5 points.  What do the wise guys know that we don’t know?  The Bears are at home, coming off a shellacking of the Browns, national television, looking for revenge, Packers without Parsons and maybe Watson and Evan Williams as well.  Sure doesn’t look good on paper to me.   

But who knows?  Maybe something special is brewing in that locker room.  Maybe these guys are tired of hearing they are toast without Micah Parsons.   Maybe they have something to prove.   

How sweet would it be to sweep these guys under these circumstances? 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (40)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Savage57's picture

December 19, 2025 at 06:28 am

This team has faced it's share of prove-it games, and so far the ledger's tipped towards them showing up and out.

Dust off that pre-Parsons scheme and game plan Hafley, and turn the dogs loose.

This game's outcome is too critical in the process of getting a ticket to the dance to be conservative.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

December 19, 2025 at 07:00 am

I am not so concerned about Hafley turning the dogs loose as I am about LaFleur going into one of his shells with a very conservative game plan. I want to see LaFleur turn Love loose.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 19, 2025 at 08:01 am

Generally I agree, but it’s going to be interesting to see who is active and how Hafley uses them now he’s seen Williams in action once in this offense. Williams has very strong traits. We need a better solution to his exiting the pocket and, minus Parsons, to stopping him running as well as his pass up the sideline. We also need to be far more stout in the middle. This week will be a very interesting test of Hafley, not just LaFleur.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

December 19, 2025 at 10:10 pm

Agreed that this will be an important game for Hafley, but he has been pretty consistent over his two years in Green Bay. I think he will have a decent game plan. I think LaFleur is much more the wild card regarding strategy.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

December 19, 2025 at 04:20 pm

MLF like to get a lead and then try to protect it and get conservative...doesnt usually work...GO FOR THE DAGGER.....let's not see that sad looking guy staring at a play sheet tomorrow late in the game...

0 points
0
0
Ihappydirt's picture

December 20, 2025 at 12:09 am

He's put that behind him (I hope).

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

December 19, 2025 at 07:20 am

"who knows? Maybe something special is brewing in that locker room"
I don't know why, Ken, but I woke up this morning thinking the same thing.
I've seen a number of interviews with coaches over the past few days and they seemed very confident with MLF and Hafley almost having that "Cat that swallowed the Canary" look at times.
I keep checking their roster moves to see if they've found another Reggie White, Sterling Sharpe, and Charles Woodson somewhere, and maybe they have but they just ain't talkin'! Has anyone heard anything about Cox, Oliver, or maybe Baryn Sorrel?
Whatever they have up their sleeves I don't know, and to some degree don't care, but its great to see that kind of confidence and hoping that it transfers to the players and the field.
There'd be nothing better that showing Ben Johnson what its like to 'Lose' to Matt LaFleur twice a year

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

December 19, 2025 at 07:27 am

I believe the line changed to Bears by 1.5.

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

December 19, 2025 at 07:34 am

No surprise if it did, with all the Packers' injuries it would seem to make more sense.

0 points
0
0
Ihappydirt's picture

December 20, 2025 at 12:07 am

Should be 3 Chi, for home field. Plus Bears are missing their 2 best WR.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

December 19, 2025 at 07:29 am

The Bears D has been opportunistic but if they don't get a TO they give up a lot of points. Don't turn the ball over and you should have success moving the ball against them.

0 points
0
0
WorseWisconsin's picture

December 19, 2025 at 12:37 pm

"The Bears D has been opportunistic but if they don't get a TO they give up a lot of points."

I...mostly...agree with this.

The Bears D backend has had its depth challenged and while their season totals on yardage and points are not good, the turnovers have offset that.

But they've been getting healthier and they're starting to get a little stingier on points and yardage.

Overall the Bears have pretty solid talent on the backend (CB, S, LB), but the Bears big issue is their D-line at both DT and DE. With all due respect to the Legion of Doom, most top-8 defenses need an NFL+ D-line in order to take control of a game.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 19, 2025 at 07:37 am

I place my bet on Edgerrin Cooper--he is incredibly athletic and instinctive. He will become a household name this Saturday. He will defintely do his best but the other guys need to show up too-Cox and Sorrell.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 19, 2025 at 12:10 pm

People talking about him simply playing #1's role. I think he's better in coverage than #7, and Quay's at his best playing downhill, so it would seem to make more sense to keep Cooper in coverage and have Quay do his best Micah Parsons impersonation, if this type of strategy is tried at all.

I'll be very interested to see who they play, where, and how this game is coached ...

GPG!!

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 19, 2025 at 12:54 pm

I was recently watching tape on Cooper and it was staggering how he could diagnose OL
coverages and not only slip through easily but his speed was amazing. He's quite intelligent.
I can see both of them charging WIlliams

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

December 19, 2025 at 07:42 am

" The latest line has them at minus 1.5 points. What do the wise guys know that we don’t know? "

The public tends to overreact to injuries. I have seen very few non-QBs move a line more than a point. Parson's is a great player but when handicapping he probably only moves the line about half a point. That isn't to say he isn't a great player but if you took the average of a 1000 simulations of the game after his loss the average point loss is less than most fans who don't look at probabilities would think. Trent Williams has been the only non-QB who gets injured that actually moves the line more than a point, he was 1.5 to 2 points in recent years. 49ers where a different team without him. Miles Garrett might be another, hasn't missed enough time for me to ever handicap it. Sorry to the WR fans who think they are game changers, losing Chase was less than a .5 point. They are easier to mask and replace than most fans think.

With that said the Bears line did get slammed to where they are now -1.5. Someone with lots of cash and the respect of the Casinos hit that line hard to make it switch sides. IMO this isn't a game you bet, too much of a coin flip.

0 points
0
0
mjbrogno's picture

December 19, 2025 at 07:55 am

I agree it’s time for the offense to play a mistake free game. The defense will give us a chance to stay in the game. We need time consuming drives, that did not happen two weeks ago. Yes, it’s great to score fast, but let’s keep the Bears defense on the field longer, Go Pack Go !!!

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 19, 2025 at 11:26 am

Well, I don't know about mistake free, but they absolutely, positively, have to not turn the ball over.

If we shorten the game, and each team ends up with 9 possessions, and we give away two of them, we have to score on just about every remaining possession, and about half need to be TDs, not FGs. That would give us around 30 points, and that's what it's going to take, IMO.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 19, 2025 at 08:07 am

The line is pretty noncommittal in reality anyway. Time for the coaches to show what they’re made of, but in any case, the Packers health is so opaque that it could be a big factor among those active, hardly noticeable or anywhere in between.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 19, 2025 at 08:12 am

I don’t expect much blitzing in this game with or without Parsons out. Hafley will probably focus on containment, using Quay or Coop as a spy to limit his ground game. The plan would be not just containment but also making sure he can’t roll out to his right. Two years of data show that Caleb struggles with accuracy when scrambling, so hopefully he’s not as sharp as he was in the first game. One area he is very good at is 10+ yards over the middle. We must concentrate on that area as well. I believe that will be partially Hobbs responsibility. This approach should also make our run defense more effective, which I see as another key to the game—stopping the run.

On offense, I’m not against taking a conservative approach, though definitions may vary. I see a run-heavy game plan as the key to opening up the passing game, rather than the reverse as some suggest. Running the ball helps limit exposure to the Bears’ ball-hawking secondary. Mixing in more play action to find open receivers makes sense to me. And if they switch to a single high safety and give us one-on-one opportunities, then by all means, take the shot. In order to win the North, this is truly a must win game!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 19, 2025 at 10:13 am

"I see a run-heavy game plan as the key to opening up the passing game, rather than the reverse as some suggest. "

I think the Packers need to be prepared to adjust their attack based on what the Bears throw at them defensively. The Bears aren't in the same category as Denver either in pass rush or in defense in general, but the Packers walked up and down the field on Denver until Watson got hurt (and even after Tom got hurt). I'd be building off that: mixing up run and pass calls on early downs and being active in the intermediate zones to loosen up the front 7 against the run.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

December 19, 2025 at 10:31 am

Teams don't employ a "spy" all that much anymore. A spy can be detrimental to a defense. You are basically taking a guy off the board just to contain the QB from running. That spy also would need a clear path to the QB to be able to contain them which is never the case. If the QB is a big threat to run it will limit how much you can play man coverage. Play zone and be cognitive that the QB could be running behind the routes.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 19, 2025 at 12:16 pm

And if your spy can't overtake the QB he's entirely ineffective. Cooper and Quay ran a 4.51 and 4.52 40 at the combine, Caleb 4.59. That's not a big enough difference to be able to cover ground and catch up.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 19, 2025 at 02:03 pm

How you define a spy can vary, but essentially it’s about having someone watch for a QB run. Some coaches prefer sticking with containment in a zone scheme, but not all, and using a spy can be very effective at stopping QB runs on 3rd and long that might otherwise turn into first downs. However, with Hafley, it’s clear he’ll aim to contain Caleb’s running ability.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 19, 2025 at 08:15 am

"Maybe something special is brewing in that locker room. Maybe these guys are tired of hearing they are toast without Micah Parsons. Maybe they have something to prove."

The Packers need to play with a sense of urgency and the coaching staff can't wait for new player groupings and tendencies to gel...they'll need to force the issue. Three games to go--they need to win two to lock up a postseason berth on their own, but that magic number drops with every Detroit loss, too. Philly is the question mark, but it's looking more and more like a WC round rematch with the Bears is lurking on the horizon.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 19, 2025 at 12:17 pm

We aren't supposed to be a wildcard again this year :/

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

December 19, 2025 at 08:32 am

I was also surprised that the Packers were favored in this game, and I'm not surprised that it caused a lot of people to bet on the Bears, so they are now favored.

No mention of Zach Tom being hurt. His loss in the Denver game was a killer, and he probably won't play in this game. But at least they can prepare for his absence this time.

I don't think this is a good game to do a lot of blitzing. Williams is just the kind of QB who can evade blitzers and run or throw for big gains when they go past him. And he's not the kind of QB who's going to sit in the pocket and carve up a defense, especially with his two best receivers not playing. Of course there needs to be some pressure, but choose your spots carefully for blitzing.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 19, 2025 at 09:18 am

You have to blitz into his face side, preferably with a Safety, or CB. Get there fast and if he retreats, he will be moving to his left. Can Gary hold the Edge? Hafley should get the 3-4 looks in play with Hopper taking some gaps to counter the 12 looks from Johnson. . We will see if LaFleur can rise to the moment?

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 19, 2025 at 11:35 am

IF he moves to his Left, it forces our secondary to cover much more of the field than when he's rolling Right, where we have to cover a smaller field because he can't throw across his body to the middle of the field.

I'd use it against him: Keep him rolling right, chase him with a fast guy so he can't just turn upfield. He threw 35 times for 185 yards last time....that's barely better than handing it off. He's not hurting us when he throws like that.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

December 19, 2025 at 01:06 pm

Some of his best throws in that last game were made when he was rolling to his right. I think he may actually benefit from having more limited choices. In that situation, the emphasis is more on his athleticism than his decision making. I hope they can keep him hemmed in on that side better than they did last time.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 20, 2025 at 09:11 am

His highest completion average is around 65% throwing from the pocket. His primary escape route from [pressure is to roll out to his right where his deep ball completions are less than 20%. If he goes left the completion rate is around 18%. These tendencies are similar to his time at USC. He is more dangerous in the pocket and his short game works best running to his right to the safety valve. Get in his face fast and make him move left from the pocket.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

December 19, 2025 at 09:05 am

Ordinarily would like to see the run game to open the pass vs the bares.

My gut now tells me to pass to open up the run. Need first downs and long scoring drives and keep the Defense on the sideline and fresh for the 2nd half.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 19, 2025 at 09:19 am

Dust off the Holmgren game plans.

0 points
0
0
Swisch's picture

December 19, 2025 at 11:13 am

I'm hoping that Micah's time with the Packers is having a good effect on raising up the play of our other defenders -- not only with techniques and tricks of the trade, but with instilling the relentlessness that Micah exhibits so profoundly.
Being around the greatness of Micah may rub off on his teammates.
It's not that the other defenders on the Packers should try to be exactly like Micah, but that perhaps they can learn a thing or two tactically, while also taking away a sense of the effort that is required for greatness.
While Micah was in the game against the Broncos, I had the impression that Nix was always aware that Micah was probably on pace to track him down on any given drop back, and that Nix was a little more in a hurry as a result, and so not as effective.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 19, 2025 at 12:55 pm

Andy Herman graded the D after Parsons went out and they had significant negative grades.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 19, 2025 at 02:12 pm

He would’ve had significantly lower grades in the second half of the Bears game with Parsons in there. Parsons isn’t the end-all, be-all, one player doesn't make a football team. Look at Cinci, LV, Pitts, Cleveland & Dallas last year with Parsons, one great edge rusher or at any position other the QB isn't going to make you into a winner. Adjustments were made, and we didn’t handle them well in either game. That’s on Hafley and the players.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 19, 2025 at 11:30 am

After watching the Seahawks/Rams last night, I feel better about the Packers. These guys make plenty of mistakes.

They also score points, and we're at that point in the year where the best teams score points, even without key people (like Davante Adams, last night, for LA). The Packers offense needs to score points . We scored 28 on Chicago two weeks ago, and we need to improve on that. From here on out, weak offensive outputs will either cost us the division title or a playoff spot altogether.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 19, 2025 at 02:13 pm

Yep, there isn’t a dominant team in the NFC. As fans, we tend to scrutinize our own team more than others. It’s understandable—we’re passionate about them and don’t watch other teams as closely.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

December 19, 2025 at 10:44 pm

Just move the chains…all night..long drives…defense can’t get gassed like the first Bears game…

0 points
0
0
Ihappydirt's picture

December 20, 2025 at 12:11 am

Seriously think Cox could impact this game. He was coming on big at the end of last year and has been champing at the bit all 2025. He knows this is his opportunity.

0 points
0
0