The Lass Word: Raising the Standard

Parsons sees the vision.

      You can be forgiven if you are still recovering from the shock of the collapse of the Green Bay Packers defense last Sunday night.  It’s understandable.  It really was quite stunning to see a unit that had pretty well shut down the Lions, Commanders and Browns, suddenly turn into a sieve of ineptitude, unable to sack the quarterback, tackle, cover, or take the ball away.  A unit that gave up 40 points to a team that was beaten 31-14 by the Bears the previous week.  Did we all overrate this defense?  Were those first three games a mirage?  An illusion?  A fluke? 

    Micah Parsons says no.  The defense is for real.  He called the Dallas game “a rough patch”.  It is not who they are, he says.  And certainly not what they will become.  He wants you to understand that his arrival on the team completely changes its potential, in a way that perhaps the players and the coaches don’t yet understand.  “I can play all five spots,” the two time all pro states, in a way that seems matter of fact, void of conceit.  “I don’t think there’s anyone that can do what I do.  I mean that in the most humble way possible.” 

    It’s not bragging if it’s true.  Quarterback pressures are a subjective statistic.  I've seen several different figures.  According to jsonline.com, Parsons has 24 pressures, 9 QB hits and 2.5 sacks.  He's done that despite being with his new team for only a little over a month. Whatever caused the breakdowns against the Cowboys, it wasn’t because of Parsons.  He, of course, won’t say that, but reading between the lines of his comments after the game isn’t difficult.   

    One thing he hopes will develop in light of his presence is a general raising of the standard on defense.  He pointed to the praise he has received for chasing down Dak Prescott from behind inside the five yard line  in the fourth quarter.  The sack prevented a touchdown that likely would have lost the game.  “I’m here because I’m supposed to make that play, not because ‘oh my god he made that play’, I’m supposed to make that play.  I’m supposed to help our defense.  That’s the reason I was brought here.  Making plays is what I’m supposed to do.  Taking over games is what I’m supposed to do.  I don’t think I should be rewarded for that play.  That’s the reason I’m here.” 

    Parsons believes big defensive plays should be the norm for everybody on the unit.  They shouldn’t stand out.  He believes this defense will get to that point.  What’s more, he has ideas on how to do it, ideas he is excited about.  So much so, he started talking to defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley about them as the team was in the locker room following the tie with the Cowboys.  “We (he and Hafley) were just sitting down together for ten or fifteen minutes post game and I said I want to meet with you one-on-one.  Same thing I did with (former Dallas DC Mike) Zimmer, same thing I did with (former Dallas DC) Dan Quinn. Just about what he sees, what I see, how we can scheme up.  I’ll take my personal time out of my way so that we can build our relationship together.  I hope that, throughout this bye week, we come back and start doing more things together.” 

    As we come to the quarter mile pole in the season, the stats reveal a curious state of affairs about the defense.  The trade for Parsons was supposed to shore up the Packers’ pass rush and pass defense.  Prior to opening day, there was still concern as to whether the unit could stop the run, particularly in light of the loss of Kenny Clark.  Ironically, through four games, Green Bay ranks second in the league in rush yards allowed.  Only the Browns have been better at stopping the running game.  However, the Packers currently stand no better than sixteenth in passing yards allowed. (per nfl.com)  They stand tied for seventh in sacks with eleven total. One believer in the Parsons plan is Rashan Gary.  The seventh year veteran has never had double digit sacks in a season.  This year he is already nearly halfway there with four and a half. 

    Parsons says things will only get better.  “We’re still new together.  I wish we had a training camp together where he (Hafley) could have seen some things, and we could have had some things in by now to expand on how really good we can be together.” 

    A bye week is certainly not a training camp, but it can, and should, provide time to figure out what this defense can be.  Next week the Packers will face the Bengals, a team struggling on offense after the loss of quarterback Joe Burrow.  It will be interesting to see if Green Bay’s defense can return to dominance.  With the combined brains of Hafley and Parsons, they should find a way to do it. 

     After all, there's a new standard to live up to.  

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (23)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Savage57's picture

October 03, 2025 at 07:17 am

In the first three games we saw consistent play without gaffes across all three levels in the defense.

Against Dallas, the defensive discombobulation we saw once Wyatt was injured is either reassuring or scary as hell. If that guy's presence is that significant, Gute backed up the Brinks truck at the wrong guy's house.

Hopefully, it's an aberration.

0 points
0
0
TheKanataThrilla's picture

October 03, 2025 at 09:22 am

Wyatt's injury was certainly a turning point of the game. Unfortunately behind him we have Rookies and JAGs.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

October 03, 2025 at 07:19 am

Defense probably ranked much better before week 4 so hopefully Dallas was just a bad game. It isn't like Detroit and Washington are no good on offense either. The fact Dallas was running the ball so well has me more concerned than the pass rush. Mainly because that was my worry to start the season and I know this pass rush will get home. With the Parson's trade it left the defense a little light in the pants as Vic Ketchman would say. Any long term injuries to a DT would really hurt this team, possibly more than even a injury to Parsons as we have LVN and Gary for depth.

Every season has ebbs and flows. No one dominates the full season since the cap has been in place. The Pats team that went 16-0 wasn't playing their best football at the end of the season and lost the SB. The 2010 Packers looked dead in the water in mid-December than caught fire and won it all. Way too early to make declarations on what this team will or won't be just yet.

The coaches will be working overtime this bye week. I wouldn't put Hafley in a head coaching job just yet. He will have to figure out away to make this defense tops in pass and run coverage. There is talent on D but there also some holes that need addressing. With a great pass rush other deficiencies can be masked with a good coordinator.

As for the players during the bye week, they will be on vacation. A trend we handicappers have seen is that teams coming out of a bye are very poor against the spread. Fans seem to think these players are single minded responsible adults who will go to bed early all week and study film. In reality it is a bunch of kids in their mid to late 20s with millions of dollars in the bank account. What would you do on your week off under those circumstances? I would be on a beach with my shirt off talking to all the ladies. For the players the bye week is about blowing off steam and forgetting about the grind for a few days. They will be trickling back to Green Bay this weekend with bloodshot eyes and lots of fun stories.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

October 03, 2025 at 07:28 am

Parsons was a good addition to this team but he addresses only one need at basically one position. The loss of Kenny Clark and Slayton may be the sad offset to this trade. Teams with decent O-lines will run the ball through us as they typically did. Dallas, down a couple of starting linemen did exactly that. Gary and Van Ness are who we have seen over the last 3-4 years, need the benefit of scheme or weak O-lines to be effective. Teams will double team Parsons and wear him down unless some other guys step up. Unfortunately, the secondary needs Parsons more than we like to admit. The pass rush was suppose to cover for another gap in this defense

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

October 03, 2025 at 08:53 am

A good pass rush will cover up other areas which is why the Edge rushers get paid like they do. If you can rush 4 and get pressure you don't need a great secondary. Diggs and Bland got paid in Dallas but they should be sending Parsons a gift basket. Those guys won't get those kind of deals again now they actually have to cover WRs for more than a few seconds.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

October 03, 2025 at 10:05 am

Very true BB. The other factor we now need to consider is that our light in the pants D-line requires that we commit more resources to stop the run. This makes us vulnerable to smart play calling, the likes of which we saw in Dallas.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

October 03, 2025 at 11:08 am

They both made key plays to stifle the Pack last Sunday.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

October 03, 2025 at 07:51 am

That stupid Shield your coins add won’t let is still blocking the last paragraph to read…fix it or lose it!

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

October 03, 2025 at 08:45 am

?

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

October 03, 2025 at 10:10 am

bjk, google "free ad blocker" or put your phone in read mode.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

October 03, 2025 at 08:34 am

Fans often forget there are smart people working for the 31 other teams in the NFL.

Baseball offers a bit of perspective. A new hot pitcher comes on the scene and blows everyone away(The Miz). But after several games his hot stuff cools off as the scouts find a weakness hitters can exploit. The same is true in the NFL. The scouts see the Packers weaknesses and exploit those weaknesses. It's part of the game. That is not the end of the story. A true winner finds a way to overcome the setbacks and once again set the agenda.

I've never been big on this 'vision thing' because the real work to make the vision real is often done by people who often aren't around talking big picture. It begins with every block, every handoff, every pass, every tackle. You can envision a great meal but it happens only if a great cook sweats the work.

I have long maintained the NFL is 80 percent talent, 10 percent coaching and 10 percent pure luck(such as injuries).
I hope the team has its sights set on the Super Bowl, but it won't get there unless the high-paid talent does all the little stuff to make it happen.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

October 03, 2025 at 08:56 am

I would say about 20 maybe 25 teams have smart people working for them. There are more than a few franchises that are completely clueless. The NFL more than almost any other profession is filled with nepotism and favors to friends. Some owners run their franchise like it is the family food truck.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

October 03, 2025 at 10:15 am

The Jets exist, Harry, so I think we have to stipulate smart people exist on 30 teams rather than 31. Also, the NFL is at least 20% fashion these days.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

October 03, 2025 at 10:37 am

Aaron Glenn is hardly a fool. There just aren't as many smart people around him.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

October 03, 2025 at 11:34 am

Talent is 80% but coaching is only 10%? Never, ever in my experience playing competitive sports, watching it, and observing the impact of coaching changes has coaching been a low percentage contributor leading to Team success.

How did Hafley and his coaches take most of that 80% Defensive talent...that for several years dwelled in the NFL basement, were "coached" to an NFL top 5 Defense?

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

October 03, 2025 at 12:14 pm

Talent will always supersede coaching. I don't know what percentage is but owners shell out big money for talent and coaches usually make a fraction of that. Never in my years of competition, viewing or handicapping have I ever thought coaching was worth more than a point or two. How many HOF coaches didn't have a HOF QB? Gibbs is the only one I can think of but he had plenty of other talent and his QBs where all pretty good. How many OCs of Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Rodgers we see completely fail because when they moved on they didn't have a HOF QB with them? IT would be easier to list the ones that succeeded.

Where the Packers a top 5 defense last year? They where 6th in scoring and yards. That is good but that really only tells us half the story in the NFL. How did they perform vs the best offenses? Couldn't stop the Vikings or Lions last year. The schedule last year was fairly easy with easy games vs offenses completely decimated by injury such as Saints, SF and Miami.

A bad coach can tank a team but there aren't that many really bad coaches out there. You can point to some quick turnarounds but a most of the time that turnaround was do to the team drafting top 10 and the talent hitting its prime. Not saying coaching doesn't matter but I will take great talent over great coaching every day and twice on Sunday.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

October 03, 2025 at 08:49 am

Remember, when Micah first came to the NFL he was an off-ball linebacker. Then as time went on his pass rush was so impressive he spent more and more time there. When he says he can play all 5 spots, he means it. I have every confidence that Hafley will use Parsons in a dizzying number of ways.
Sure, the league adjusts from week to week, no doubt. But when it comes to Hafley, I think more often than not, his adjustments will give the GB D the advantage.
GPG!

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

October 03, 2025 at 09:46 am

Parsons isn't alone out there. If he is being double teamed, that means the one or another pass rushers should be able to at least be able to force the QB to hurry his throw, if not get a sack. Make the offense adjust the OL blocking schemes to have to account for more than one player. I have heard on here by at least two columnists that the Dallas OL got away with a lot of holding during the game. That is where LaFleur needs to step in, get in the ref's ear and let him know repeatedly that holding is occurring. If a couple of flags are thrown, the OL should have to play more honestly, giving the defense more opportunities. Bottom line, the other guys on the line need to do their jobs better.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

October 03, 2025 at 10:33 am

Thoughtful piece, Ken. I love the title; gives me old-school Packers yearbook vibes like "Koncar Remains the Hub" and "Lofton: I'll Stay in Green Bay."

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

October 03, 2025 at 11:00 am

Hopefully Stackhouse has an education now and improves rather quickly. He has to obviously show great improvement and rather quickly!

0 points
0
0
Duneslick's picture

October 03, 2025 at 11:17 am

Why didnt they bring up Brinson instead of stackhouse. He is much much more similar to wyatt

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

October 03, 2025 at 11:38 am

Guess they must have thought Stackhouse was ahead of him in his training and readiness.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

October 03, 2025 at 11:44 am

There is a reason Stackhouse went undrafted. He has great size and skills to coach up...but entering the draft he was not translating his size and skills consistently. And he has been far less consistent being "educated" in the NFL to date. It's early...but he has been covered up rather well by the opponents he has faced...all of them better than most all of the guys he faced in college.

Will he learn and adjust? His work ethic seems quite good. He's a project yet...but one Covington should enjoy molding him to be a key rotation player.

0 points
0
0