The Lass Word: Something's Missing

But what is it?

The Green Bay Packers are in the playoffs for the sixth time in Matt LaFleur's seven years at the helm.  There's a lot to be said for that.  The Atlanta Falcons haven't been to the post season in eight years.  The New York Jets haven't taken the field for a playoff game in fifteen years.  There are a bunch of fan bases that would give anything to enjoy the level of success that we supporters of the green and gold enjoy.  

The question is, do we enjoy it?  Or does the elation get lost in the frustration of the failures to make deep runs toward the Super Bowl?   Matt LaFleur is 3-5 in post season play.  His Packers have lost twice in the NFC championship game, and haven't made it back to that game since 2020.  But the past is the past.  Here they stand again with another run at it.  When the Vikings upset the Lions on Christmas day, the Packers were given their ticket to the dance once more.  In all likelihood, they will have to be road warriors once again.  It Is possible, though not likely, Green Bay could still win the division.  They would have to win their final two games, and the Bears would have to lose both of theirs.  Hard to see that happening.  It looks like the Rams, Seahawks and 49ers may finish with better records than the Packers.  So just like last year, it looks like a number seven seed, and a tough road game at the number two seed.

But at least they are in the tournament.  Are they good enough to catch fire and make a run all the way, as they did in 2010 when they entered the playoffs as the lowest seed, but won three straight road games to get to the Super Bowl and win it?. Is this that kind of team?  Frankly, it hasn't looked like it.  At least not consistently.  Consider what has transpired over the course of the last four months:  

In week three at Cleveland, the Packers needed only to kick a 43 yard field goal to beat the Browns.  The kick was blocked, and five plays later, the Browns booted a walk off field goal to win the game. 

In week nine at home, Green Bay executed a 12 play, 71 yard drive, scoring a touchdown with 2:32 left to play, to tie the Panthers 13-13.  But then the defense, which had been stout the entire game, yielded a nine-play drive to Carolina, which ended with a walk-off game-winning field goal. 

In week ten, the Packers were trailing the Eagles 10-7, but were in the middle of a nine-play drive in the final minutes.  On fourth and one, Josh Jacobs fumbled the ball behind the line of scrimmage.  Drive over.  Game over. 

In week fifteen Green Bay had gone ahead of the Broncos in Denver by nine points in the third quarter, and the defense had just held and come up with a stop.  But Jordan Love had a long pass to Christian Watson intercepted, Watson was hurt on the play, and the entire team immediately collapsed.  Denver reeled off 20 points, and won 34-26.  They also inflicted a physical beating on the Packers, as several left the game injured. 

And of course, in week sixteen, Green Bay, despite losing Jordan Love to concussion protocol early on, had the Bears basically beaten in the final minutes, only to botch an onside kick, and then fail at the end of regulation and in overtime, suffering a costly and crushing defeat. 

Something is clearly missing from this team.  Yet I am hard pressed to figure out what it is.  It’s not lack of talent.  The Packers have shown they can outplay some of the best teams in the league, at least for the majority of a game.  They’ve beaten the Lions twice.  They dominated the Commanders when Washington was at full strength early in the season and whom many thought would go to the Super Bowl, and they still had Jayden Daniels.  They pounded the Steelers in Pittsburgh.  They knocked off the Bears in Lambeau, and had them whipped in Chicago, until they didn’t.  Green Bay couldn’t have been in those situations unless they had strong and deep talent. 

It’s not the coaching.  Any objective observer has to be impressed with the way Matt LaFleur and his staff have designed game plans and called plays to keep the team competitive in the wake of critical losses including Micah Parsons, DeVonte Wyatt, Elgton Jenkins, and Tucker Kraft, as well as the temporary losses and limitations of Christian Watson, Evan Williams, Zach Tom, Josh Jacobs and Quay Walker.  Even their kicker was banged up for a while.  The coaching staff has done a solid, if not brilliant, job of holding things together. 

It’s not the front office.  Brian Gutekunst has gathered a roster that is as deep and talented as any in the league, and even swung big to acquire Parsons in an effort to put the team over the top.  His maneuvering to add key subs such as Malik Willis and Derek Kinnard have proved to be life saving. 

It’s not even the injury misfortunes.  Every team has them.  The Bears played last Saturday without their two best receivers.  Green Bay was on the road, with a deafening hostile crowd, playing a team fighting for its place in history, on national prime time TV.  The Packers had lost their starting quarterback early on.  Jacobs had to be pulled out with a bad knee.  Watson was on a pitch count.  And yet, the team executed beautifully and was in perfect position to win the game. 

So, if it’s not the talent, the coaches, the front office or the injuries, what is it?  Why can’t this team close?  All five of their losses were by one score.  Three of them ended with walk off plays by the opponent.  Why is their collective poise and confidence so fragile?  Is it because they are once again the youngest team in the league?  I don’t buy that, because all of the key players are battle-tested veterans.  Guard Anthony Belton is the only rookie making a significant contribution.   

Is it culture?  Can’t be.  Where in the NFL is there a winning culture more evident than in Green Bay?  Titletown.  Thirteen championships.  These players know the standard, the expectations.  They also know the Packers haven't won the division since 2021.  

To bring another Lombardi trophy to Lambeau Field, this team is going to have to find that missing element.  That little magic that makes the difference between pulling close games out of the fire, or choking them away.  They have two more regular season games to find it, beginning against the Ravens Saturday night.  It will be important to finish strong.

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (138)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Savage57's picture

December 26, 2025 at 06:10 am

That missing element is confidence.

When the kimchi gets deepest, the team mirrors their coach, and becomes distressed.

Matt has a lot of attributes as a head coach, but a steely, measured resolve in the crucible of the most pressure-filled moments isn't among them.

0 points
0
0
panda's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:00 am

Totally agree

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:23 am

Totally disagree. LaFleur isn't a Jim Harbaugh, Jon Gruden, overtly rah-rah type, but I think he is pretty steely - and recently has been bolder....

I have seen nothing, absolutely nothing to suggest he is distressed when things are tight (as they so often are, this being the NFL where margins are razor-thin). I believe you are confirming your own personal bias, more than making an objective comment......
(see @murf7777' s comment below).

0 points
0
0
Savage57's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:35 am

Look back at the bright light games and observe Matt's behavior at the end of of them when the outcome hangs in the balance.

You typically won't see calm, cool, and collected. More often than not you'll see confusion, panic, chaos, exasperation, and questionable decision-making.

I don't have a bias towards Matt, no ax to grind with him. It's an anwser to the question Ken posed, and a conclusion predicated upon empirical evidence. High pressure moments aren't Matt's, or the team's, wheelhouse.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:47 am

.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:48 am

Don't forget the stupid challenges he makes in pressure moments either. He does that shit all the time!

That's a good part of the reason why most of his challenges are unsuccessful. Many of his challenges are emotional reactions without much of a chance to be overturned.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:56 am

I don't need a coach that's calm cool and collected. That's one way to win, and is obviously JL10's style. I'll agree I detect exasperation, frustration, and a general inability to adjust when what he's doing doesn't work. Some people put it that he gets "out coached," and I can't disagree; the obvious question there is which instances has that happened, vs not. What I think is relevant is that when everything's happening at once including clock management and still needing to call plays and get appropriate player personnel packages on (and off!) the field, those big moments have been too much for him with some regularity. That's not a knock on MLF, either; there's a limit to what any one person can do and I'd like to see some responsibilities delegated. I didn't see this type of scenario in either of the two most recent losses.

Is it as simple as your last sentence? Is the solution as simple as a coach with a stronger mind / will / determination bleeds that onto the team? I'm not joining the chorus of those calling for anyone's job (except RB, I think that need has been obvious for at least two seasons now) but neither do I rule this out as a possible solution. I do know that I don't want to see this team without Hafley next season ...

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:45 am

I think MLF is improving in this regard, but plenty of times he looks distressed. Plenty of times we've seen him behind, not knowing what to do, and losing the game. Both from a lead, as well as being dominated throughout the game. Fortunately that hasn't happened once this season, which does still give the impression that this team could beat anyone, even with several of our best players out injured.

Is that really responsible for the inexplicable losses? Many suggest so. I'm not so sure it's that simple, but I don't claim to know the answer. I do agree with the article here that it's not a lack of talent. While it took MLF multiple games to conjure up what to do without #85, he did eventually adjust in ways that gave this team a chance to win. I don't want to say it's impossible to win the SB this season, but I'd be pleasantly surprised by getting as far as the NFCCG, even with a loss there. One and done wouldn't surprise me, but no one on the roster can afford that mentality.

GPG!

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:56 am

You can criticize any coach (even the best) for showing signs of distress or anxiety and point to reasons like being outplayed or making poor decisions. Certainly, Mlf has made his share. Still, MLF has led the team to the playoffs three straight years with Love, who’s been frequently injured and is solid but not on the level of Mahomes, Josh, or Lamar—the only quarterbacks whose teams have more wins over the past six years. Isn't winning the ultimate measure of a head coach's success, rather than appearing distressed?

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:11 am

I believe Lafluer is a quality head coach who demonstrates ample resolve, a quality often misunderstood as a need for an outward, fiery demeanor. The notion that he lacks commitment, determination, or a desire to overcome obstacles is flawed.

In fact, the seemingly more "steely-eyed" coach, Dan Campbell, who many have stated in the past they want him over LaFluer, is sitting home for the playoffs. This contrast in outcomes highlights that coaching styles vary in effectiveness. LaFleur, while often calm and calculated, has plenty of "fire" and an aggressive mindset when the situation demands it.

LaFleur's consistent success and the Packers' performance through roster changes (especially the transition from Rodgers to Love) are the real metrics of his resolve and ability to adapt.

We all have our opinions, but what matters the most is results.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:11 am

Well put! Discussing these intangibles certainly isn't going to change anything, but makes for an interesting thought experiment, and might be cathartic through this painful waiting period as we watch how this season plays out. GB has maintained a certain level of success throughout MLF's tenure, and what he accomplished with AR12 is still laudable even without winning it all. Nobody's talking about it but getting the sixth seed is also a possibility this season, which would at least be some variety.

"LaFleur, while often calm and calculated, has plenty of "fire" and an aggressive mindset when the situation demands it." I'll agree, but also state that the balance and timing between being aggressive vs conservative calls for good judgment, which MLF has not consistently delivered. Some have written him off as being unable to put it together at the highest level; I don't see how that's knowable, neither do I see who's available that would make a better HC. If it comes down to this choice, I'd rather see Hafley retained as HC vs losing him to that promotion somewhere else. While I doubt MLF would be willing to take the demotion to OC, it might be a winning combination. In August no one expected the current "best five," but it shows signs of developing into something special. Hafley as HC with MLF as OC might prove to be a winning combination too? (Hopefully Ryan's knee holds up after the friendly fire)

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 03:58 pm

I don’t deny that MLF has made some bad calls, and I think if other coaches were scrutinized as closely as ours, you’d find flaws there too. That’s why I believe the best measure isn’t our opinions, but consistent winning. My guess is if GB let him go, he’d be hired within a day or so—he’s that good by comparison.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

December 31, 2025 at 09:44 am

As has been said already, ALL coaches have made decisions, made calls, thrown flags, that fans (well, at least some fans) will claim are 'stupid'.

It's an easy criticism to level at a coach, especially as the fan does not have to worry about being wrong. I'd add that some fans (not all, but a vocal minority) seem bipolar, insofar as they love a coach or hate them and there just isn't anything in between, no sliding scale, no balance.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:21 am

"In fact, the seemingly more "steely-eyed" coach, Dan Campbell, who many have stated in the past they want him over LaFluer, is sitting home for the playoffs."

Campbell is stoic mostly during games. He was certainly stoic yesterday and against Pittsburgh as the Lions frittered away their playoff chances.

There have been many who have said that his act has a short shelf life in the NFL--him and Jim Harbaugh. They tend to get the motors burning hot, but you can't play and practice that way all the time for very long. Admittedly, as their young roster matured into second contracts, they've lost their OL depth and injuries haven't helped there, either.

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

December 26, 2025 at 01:14 pm

Since 1992, the Green Bay Packers have the best winning percentage by a team, winning 63.0 percent of the time.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

December 26, 2025 at 06:42 am

Great question Ken. I'm less critical of the coaching staff now, than previous parts of the season. I think the game plans adjusting for key injuries have been very good. If anything....still around discipline and focus in the heat of moments. On the sideline, in the huddle...what is needed that all 11 players are focused and avoid penalties or blown assignments at key moments when the crux of the game is at hand...and emotions are high. That Brinson facemask was huge, as one example which nullified a deep sack and 4th down. Maybe a lilttle veteran leadership in the huddle...I don't know. I agree. Talent is there, as well as all of the pieces to reach the championship. GB is close. Your question is the question to ask. Why doesn't this team turn out the lights and close the door?

0 points
0
0
Renllaw's picture

December 26, 2025 at 06:59 am

Six straight playoff berths under LaFleur is elite consistency. Thanks to the Vikings embarrassing the Lions on Christmas, we're officially dancing again.

This squad has shown flashes of dominance. With two weeks to heal our remaining guys and let the offense find its rhythm—Jordan Love back slinging TDs, Watson stepping up—There is nothing stopping this team from catching fire like that magical 2010 run. You remember the IR list on that team?

And dont forget our special teams, we....... Ahh crap..... Offense and Defense need to make sure we are up by 3 possessions going into the final last 6 or 7 minutes of a game.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:19 am

"This squad has shown flashes of dominance."

More than just flashes! They've been downright dominant for long stretches of games, just not 60 minutes. Going back to last season I was frequently stating the need to develop the habit of 100% effort from everybody, every play, throughout the whole game. If that habit had been ingrained for two seasons or longer, I'd like to think there wouldn't have been these disastrous meltdowns. I think that would show up in the W column.

If the team had only shown flashes of dominance this season, it wouldn't be so agonizing right now. They've shown dominance enough to overcome even self inflicted errors, for up to 57 minutes out of multiple games ...

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:15 am

There have been too many close losses for sure, but they are 9-5-1. They have closed out their opponents in several close games.

I was actually hoping the Lions would win yesterday so the Packers would have to do some more work to earn a playoff spot. They are still fighting for a chance at winning the division, though, so it should be all hands on deck tomorrow. Lamar Jackson is listed as "doubtful" for the game, but the Ravens have a good backup, Tyler Huntley, and they are still in the hunt--just barely--for a playoff spot.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:14 am

Tyler Huntley was more than the Packers could handle a couple years ago when the Ravens came a two point conversion from beating the Packers in Baltimore.

He's been up and down and around the league, since, but most of his ups have come in Baltimore.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:31 am

Yes, it's far from a gimme game....Now, if Baltimore had Brosmer playing, I'd feel a whole lot better. He's just not very good and looked rattled from the beginning to the end.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:03 am

"Now, if Baltimore had Brosmer playing"

...or Cooper Rush.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:26 am

I almost think a wounded Lamar gives us a better chance to win as compared to facing Huntley at 100%. Not sure if JL10's re-injured left AC joint or Malik's freshly injured right shoulder would be more of a hindrance if both are deemed ready to go?

0 points
0
0
jlc1's picture

December 26, 2025 at 03:03 pm

He was more than a Joe Barry coached defense could handle. Big difference I think.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:22 am

It's also possible that GB gets the sixth seed, in addition to 1 and 7 still being possible. It's also possible that neither #10 or 2 can play. Hopefully it doesn't come to that ...

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

December 27, 2025 at 10:48 pm

Hunley like other back ups we faced this year, will look HOF material against our secondary.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:16 am

Pass rush. Not enough pressure.
With Parsons out, it just got worse.

0 points
0
0
Savage57's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:13 am

They're getting the pressure, it's just not getting home.

"In the Bears' Week 16 overtime win against the Green Bay Packers on December 20, 2025, Williams was pressured on 18 of his 38 dropbacks, which equates to approximately 47.4%. Despite the high pressure rate, PFF noted that he managed to complete 8 passes for 165 yards and two touchdowns in those situations."

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:05 am

The Packers are rushing more than 4 way more often. I think they blitzed on over 40% of Chicago's drop backs last week. It creates those holes underneath and puts the DBs in position to play more man (which isn't their strength).

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:35 am

Compare that to the first meeting; pretty similar, right? What stats don't do, and can never do, is give the eye test. The extent of pressure Caleb was under was more intense with Micah Parsons on the field, which should surprise no one. He threw away many downs, scrambling for his life.

I was pleasantly surprised by how often that happened last game, but there wasn't the same level of duress. Caleb is going to be "a problem" for some time, the way he can complete passes under duress. So will Josh Daniels. I don't see either of them as having as much talent as JL10 when it comes to throwing off platform. I'd still like to see Jordan throw with textbook mechanics when there's no need not to, the way Malik does. Not only do we have a good QB room, we've still got talent all over the field! (CB is a top draft need)

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:27 am

Of course it got worse, but it's not like they couldn't generate any pressure.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:19 am

Thankfully the Packers are a team of effort, that has been a constant over these years. With very good QB play and a sprinkle of offensive talent it has kept us competitive. Ultimately we are not talented enough to consistently play at the higher levels. Offense plays well until it runs into a good defense with a good D-line. Similarly, defense plays well until it runs into an offense with a good O-line.

We can point to a winning record during regular season play when teams are still forming, mistakes govern the day and there is a steady diet of average. There is little room for average teams as we get to December. Watching the Packers unable to exert their will against good opponents late in games tells me they are not physical enough or trained enough. The talented enough should be evident with our stars shining in these playoff style games. Unfortunately we are not seeing enough shine when it matters most.

I am grateful for a competitive team that brings effort and is relevant. I am not seeing a championship quality team. I am not sure how they will get there from here.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:20 am

I agree its a coaching deficiency in critical situations.

0 points
0
0
GBPfaninMO's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:56 pm

Yep I've posted the same thing previously Lafleur is a good HC not great & will not get GB to a super bowl.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:23 am

It actually is the President, Front Office and Coaching. They create the culture and none of them seem to wish to make the hard decisions...
Rumors abound that Policy will re-instate Gute though he has been responsible for many questionable roster choices which has created a shaky--OL, DL CB-room and over-spending on average, expensive players with Cap casualties-
MLF would not fire subpar Coordinators, coaches nor pay attention to Special Teams.The team will remain ranked as 8th or 9th out of 32 with these underlying problems. Fans have been made to sound ungrateful or have been criticized if they question the current status quo, but GB's actions do not align with their promises. Change begins @ the GM/HC level and if done well will change the culture-look @ the Bears (Ben Johnson), Jaguars (Gladstone, Coen and Campanile), Rams (Snead, McVay).
The Bears and Jags have made remarkable leaps in one year.

LATE ENTRY: Hafley is a culture-changer-he has been on the level of Ben Johnson, Anthony Campanile and Sean McVay.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:42 am

You nailed it. Being a slightly better than average team is their business model. And “No Accountability “ is their corporate slogan. Policy was an internal hire so this is the way it’s going to be for some time.

It’s probably not a bad model for the organization. They don’t have a rich owner like the Rams or Broncos to bail them out in bad years. I just prefer the big swingers like Howie Roseman with all its ups and downs. I find it more entertaining than Grounding Day. But I was born 50 miles from GB and am a Packer fan for life whether I enjoy it or not. It’s in my DNA.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

December 26, 2025 at 02:43 pm

"They don’t have a rich owner like the Rams or Broncos to bail them out in bad years."

What more can they do financially than the Packers who devote their entire impeccable balance sheet to the Football Team? There are no "family gold" issues to interfere with team investments. (See the bares)

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:15 am

Laid out a lot of truth in your post. Let's give Policy a chance afterall he come from a legacy of winning. Maybe some of his father rubbed off. I do believe that our front office has been underperforming. They are recognizing athletes but have a hard time seeing football players. It is the reason a guy like Evan Williams stands out. We need to draft better and free agent build better if we want to compete higher.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:47 am

I tend to trust Rob Demovsky and he has said it is almost a forgone conclusion that Gutekunst will be re-signed and that he will be given full GM powers. BC has made the same mistakes for 7 years and Policy will likely remains 'hands-off' (as he has said in his interviews), which is of great concern in terms of FO accountability.

I recommend fans listen to 2-3 interviews of Policy to get the measure of the man.
(I would like to be incorrect in my assessment)

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:02 am

"I tend to trust Rob Demovsky and he has said it is almost a forgone conclusion that Gutekunst will be re-signed and that he will be given full GM powers. "

Why does anyone think that Policy is going to shift the structure at all?
And if Gutey "has made the same mistakes for 7 years," why would Policy reward him with full GM powers?
It's my expectation that nothing will change in structure until the team is prepared to move on from LaF: shifting him from reporting to the Pres. to reporting to the GM is effectively a demotion. Why would he accept that?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:37 am

If they want him to accept that, then keeping him would be inherently wrong. The fact that it was irresponsible to create this situation doesn’t change the current reality. However, of the realization is that we need to return to a unified football hierarchy as a first step to improving, that just strengthens the case for moving on from LaFleur.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:46 am

For that matter, why would MLF "accept" the team promoting Hafley to HC to prevent him from being poached elsewhere?

There's nothing easy about greatness. There's nothing great about being content with mediocrity. Several franchises envy GB's consistency in being an "also ran."

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:52 am

"For that matter, why would MLF "accept" the team promoting Hafley to HC to prevent him from being poached elsewhere?"

He won't...at least, accept a demotion to OC as some suggest around here. No HC would....ex-specially when he knows that if he were fired he won't last much more than an interview cycle on the open market before he'd be picked up as a HC somewhere else. On the other hand, moving him under Gute might be a way for the Packers to force a resignation if they want to move on. In that case, his contract would probably force him to sit out a year before he could take a job elsewhere.

"Several franchises envy GB's consistency in being an "also ran.""

You only have to look as far as Chicago, who canned Lovie Smith after a loss to the Packers bounced the Bears from the playoffs, and have had only two playoff appearances and two winning seasons since. Smith wasn't an ace, but with their crappy front office did more than just about anyone not named Ditka.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

December 26, 2025 at 01:28 pm

Dobber,

"shifting him from reporting to the Pres. to reporting to the GM is effectively a demotion. Why would he accept that?"

The answer is because nothing would have changed, assuming that the final word for all decision making on all things football-related would presumably be the GM, as it was before Ted Thompson's health crisis when Mark Murphy decided to uproot the existing structure and insert himself as the central hub that all football decisions routed through.

That is to say, MLF has always had to report to someone else who makes the final decision. So long as he continues to report to someone else who makes the final decision, nothing has really changed.

In fact.. if the Bob Harlan/Ron Wolf model is truly restored, MLF would be GAINING more control; under Harlan's model, while the GM was the final say in all football related matters, Wolf's tact was that he hired the HC he felt appropriate, and the GM's role was to make sure the HC had the talent he needed to see his vision for the team blossom. Wolf left all other coaching/staff decisions to his HC. Yes, they definitely worked as binary team to see things through, but at the end of the day, the President/CEO hired the GM he saw fit, and let his do his job. The GM hired the HC he saw fit, supported his roster needs, and left him to do his job. Etc and so forth.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

December 26, 2025 at 01:32 pm

*all of the above would hinge on Gutekunsts, should he be restored true full-control GM status as the Harlan model would have, decides to retain MLF as the head coach, of course.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 27, 2025 at 08:32 am

"That is to say, MLF has always had to report to someone else who makes the final decision. So long as he continues to report to someone else who makes the final decision, nothing has really changed."

IMO we're talking points of pride here as well as structure. I'm thinking that there are many folks here who have gone through similar administrative changes. All I would say is that in any other industry, injecting a layer of administration above someone usually is viewed as a demotion or a slap in the face...especially given that the person in question used to be a peer. Maybe the counterpoint here is that most teams don't want their HC promoted to GM, too (Mike Sherman--involuntary shudder), so your HC is unlikely to earn that "promotion" from the start.

I suppose that insult can be assuaged with a raise and contract extension, but it doesn't change the point that positioning has changed. It's only a problem once because the next man in as HC is hired into the "new" existing structure.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:42 am

What's a BC?

I'd welcome keeping Gutey with the addition of normal GM responsibility.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:39 am

I can't disagree with your sentiments here, especially wrt to Policy. I think we all fear the status quo becoming ingrained ...

0 points
0
0
LoftKing's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:27 am

If getting to the playoffs isn't enough for fans, you would not have made it through the '70s. Looking at the last two Super Bowl Teams, there was a leader on the defensive side of the ball. Reggie White and Charles Woodson. This year ours may have been Parsons, he is beyond any doubt one of the best players I think I have ever watched, but was he that guy? But with him out, I don't see that presence on the defensive side. Will someone be that guy? IDK.

Team chemistry is a mystery and can't be manufactured. But when it is there, you know it. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Right now, I see a lot of great parts.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:52 am

I think it's fine to just make it to the Play-offs but many fans want the SB and GB promises it.
GB has to get honest about building real trenches and a competent CB room before promising Super Bowls.

Parsons was being asked to correct too many existing weaknesses.

0 points
0
0
LoftKing's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:05 am

The SB is always the Goal for a Team like GB that is how it should be. Stating a goal is not making a promise. Has the team promised a Super Bowl? Not that I am aware of. For other teams, their goal may be to win 8 games. To even be in the playoff talks at the end of the year.

But to make the Super Bowl, you have to make the playoffs. With Parsons, the chances were much greater. Without him? I just don't see it. But hey, the last time they won the Super Bowl I didn't see it then either.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:49 am

We've still got many great players on the active roster. Also, it seems like every SB winner needs more than one player who didn't play much in the regular season to step up big time in the playoffs ...

GPG!

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

December 26, 2025 at 03:10 pm

This line by LoftKing:
"Stating a goal is not making a promise."
That should be in 20 point letters, backlit and flashing !!!

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:36 am

In the NFL, you have to remember that when you pay top dollar for a position like Parsons, you lose opportunities elsewhere. It becomes harder to build a well-rounded team, and there will be more weaknesses since the money isn’t spread around. GMs have a tough job managing it all.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 27, 2025 at 07:57 am

You need to elevate your low-money guys and make good on players with rookie contracts, and you need to be prepared to let some of those guys walk for comp picks.

Until the Parsons acquisition, that's been the Packers' MO. Drafting heavily into individual positions a year in advance for replacement. Now the high draft picks go away.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:34 am

If you want to see the best DE/EDGE pass rusher, check out Myles Garrett—he’s an absolute monster. Parsons is an incredible pass rusher with blazing speed, but in my opinion, he doesn’t quite measure up to Garrett or legends like Reggie White.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:53 am

"If getting to the playoffs isn't enough for fans, you would not have made it through the '70s"

The issue is this team came out in week 1 with their hair on fire, looking like they could beat anybody. The only team that has beaten GB this season is GB. Further, on paper it looks like the team "should" begin getting worse starting next season, simply due to cap restraints and how many of our starter's rookie contracts are expiring.

It wouldn't be nearly so anxiety inducing if this team hadn't shown so much potential this season.

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:35 am

We should dominate with Reed, Watson , Golden, Doubs, Wicks , Williams if he isn’t hurt

Golden either isn’t as good as we thought or we don’t pay much attention to him.

Watson , melton Golden fast on the deep balls go make a play.

You watch other teams they run after the catch. Seems like it’s either a long ball or short passes no yac.

Most of the yac went away when South Dakota got hurt.

It’s not the receivers fault . It’s bad angles. Chicago game bad angle to Watson ….that was embarrassing let him come in and break out I….its a Td.

Reed in motion. Doesn’t show much Let him work on a guy from not being in motion.

A lot of times it’s tempo with us

Lions games and parts of commanders game had good tempo

Tempo. Tempo. Tempo.

Love not under center a lot ….doesnt help. …

Wicks big Detroit game and nothing much since.

I don’t want to say it but I will.

Love is starting to remind me of Carson Wentz. One read and throw..

He is far better than Wentz…….but it seems he has went backwards parts of the seasons

Is that coaching. Play calling. A combination of both. Or like the Carolina game looking like he didn’t want to be there.

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:48 am

Golden is not being used as a deep threat. It's all end arounds and short passes, into traffic, for him.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:59 am

#0 seems to only be looked at if #11 isn't on the field. I call that a MISTAKE! It's not against league rules to have multiple fast deep threats on the same play.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:57 am

Golden is LOADED with talent! It's a crime against football to not have #0 9 and 11 on the field at the same time. Not only does speed kill, give JL10 a chance to get used to throwing to targets who can run that fast.

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:41 am

I think it revolves around not using your players to their best abilities. They hadn't drafted a WR, in the 1st round, for over 20 years. Then, this past draft, they got Matthew Golden. So what do they do? They use him on end arounds and on short slant passes.I have rarely seen, this season, a deep ball thrown Golden's way. We have Watson, who always get the deep ball thrown his way. Why not create plays for Golden, deep? I think they are wasting Golden's abilities at WR, if they don't throw him the deep ball, once in a while. Open up the offense for the WRs. Where has Wicks been, the past couple of weeks?
Another thing that gets me frustrated, is our TE room and their YAC. Tucker Kraft is sorely missed. He is the standard all other GB TEs should emulate. Musgrave is like a train that just left the rails, on his catches. Sure, he can get us 40 yards, but that's because that's where he caught the ball. Once he catches it there is no chance for YAC, as he has lost his balance, or trips over his own feet. Fitzpatrick simply does not catch passes. Now, he's out with an Achilles injury. Who is left in the TE room?
Using their players, to the best of their abilities, IMO, solves a lot of GB's problems. GO PACK, GO!!!

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:09 am

There have been rumors that Golden hasn't fully understood the play-book which has resulted in more superficial use.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:58 am

More "rumors", eh?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:43 am

He had been claimed to have run wrong routes regularly. Looking at games on rewatch he’s been involved where armor one is obviously on several occasions. That suggests some struggles. However, the idea that all players can come in and master all roles/entire playbooks is a fallacy we’ve run into before.

Rather than have players master one role, we throw everything at them. Some can handle that, some can not, and it’s not directly tied to football ability. Coaching is a lot about understanding players and how to get the most out of them. Under LaFleur, that’s not been a strength. Golden appears to be the latest example of potential deferred as a result,

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

December 26, 2025 at 01:40 pm

Perhaps Goldens needs to play a few games with Arod, he’ll learn real quick about running the wrong routes!

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

December 26, 2025 at 01:54 pm

Green Bay, historically over (roughly) the last 35 years or so, eases WRs into their offensive game plan. Whether that's by design, or a matter of happenstance, I can't say for certain, but I don't really see too much unusual of anything that can be tied directly to MLF in terms of Golden not being a featured target on offense as a rookie.

Fan expectation of what a rookie WR 'should' produce has probably been the biggest departure between 2025 and any of the 30+ years prior, and that's largely due to the 1st round pick status.. but that doesn't mean the organization is operating any differently, only that some fans thought the organization should.

Golden's utilization thus far (based on targets as a percentage of total passing attempts) is about the same as Nelson, Jennings, Adams rookie seasons . and so forth) When I say "about the same", I mean within 3-5%.. in a different offense.

I fear you have become to MLF what StockHolder is to Gute.. That's fine, just something to consider.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 27, 2025 at 08:44 am

The snap count was there, early. Golden was playing 60-70% of the snaps--where most of the "regulars" at WR fall--until Watson came back, which I think tells us something about their perceived roles. Getting someone to throw him the ball is a different matter.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 27, 2025 at 08:50 am

How do you just say things like LaFleur doesn't understand players? Especially a coach who wins so much?

Golden is a rookie. He's behind Watson, Doubs, Reed, and Wicks. That's how it's supposed to be. Next year will be different.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:02 am

How hard can it be NFLfan? I drew up many, many winning plays on the playgrounds in north central WI.

In the huddle, you tell "Golden" to run a post, full speed past the third bush on the left, stop at the spot I kissed Suzie last recess, fake an injury to the right leg (contusion or ankle sprain), fake like you are goining to call a timeout, then get up and run like Forrest Gump to the spot we talked about in Mrs William's class where we were discussing burying our report cardz.

Go, go, gooooooo,

PB

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:07 am

"In the huddle, you tell "Golden" to run a post, full speed. Catch the ball and run like Forrest Gump...."

I hope he's not wearing a knee brace...

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:09 am

Dobber....DOBBER, I am starting to dislike intelligent, knowledgeable football fans more and more....!

"full speed after the 2nd break...using leverage..."

I appreciate u brother,

PB

*Now, if we were in the huddle Dobb(ers)s, and you questioned my play call (with time running out), I would of given you the look and commanded full attention in the huddle. Thatz what winners and leaders do. I did all this and took full responsibility for the comings and goings on that playground. I was self-annointed "lil Vince", the conquerer and playa. No paycheck, just the admiration of my colleagues, lil' Suzie watching (blushing) and a Dave Roller RC, beat to heck.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:27 am

"*Now, if we were in the huddle Dobb(ers)s"

I'd be wondering how my barstool got on the field!

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:36 am

We were using it as a goal line marker. :D

Most bushes used prior seasons died due to dog urine. They obviously weren't impressed with my play calling or team execution.

WAIT, maybe it was the canines way of communicating, we got a leg up on the competition. BTW; dog's pizz was boiling.

I digress,

PB

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:40 am

I don't understand the Golden thing. 1st rounder that is hardly involved in this offense. Are all our high round picks projects? Is this a WRs coaching thing?

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:02 am

Worse than that, it's easy for a player like #0 to lose that nth degree of speed from even slight injury. I'm afraid that will happen the way they're using him; seem to only throw to him in traffic. Let the man get OPEN!

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:45 am

We shouldn’t even be talking about number 2 seed. Number 6. Etc…..

We should be number 1 seed. We flipping had it …..

Lost to panthers ,cowboys and browns Even eagles game

That’s the difference ….

So will have to get Jacob’s healthy next couple of weeks ..to make final push.

I would rest Gary also….get him fresh…

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:47 am

...I would rest Gary also….get him fresh…

Thanks for the Christmas chuckle.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:52 am

You're still playing for a home track through the playoffs.
Get the 2 seed and with the parity in the NFC you've got a good chance of hosting a couple games.
You can't rest everybody. It makes sense to rest Jacobs because Wilson has shown himself to be a very capable runner in relief, but they need to be playing as many of their first stringers as they can: both to try to get the highest possible seed, but also to establish momentum.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:04 am

#8 will take longer than a couple weeks to return to 100%. His knee has been the size of a basketball for over a month, and now he has a bum ankle too. I'd be surprised if he's healed up fully before March. Hopefully he can recover fully ...

0 points
0
0
GreenandBold's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:48 am

Gary has been resting all season .

0 points
0
0
gsd3's picture

December 26, 2025 at 02:35 pm

You could rest Gary all you want. Won't change his DNA.

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:46 am

Vikings have 8 wins with bad qb play.

We have 9 wins.

Think about that

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:18 am

The Vikings also have 8 losses, compared to 5 for the Packers. So, almost twice as many.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:06 am

Viqueens and Kittens are both 8-8, and eliminated from the playoffs 😮

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

December 27, 2025 at 10:52 pm

The Vikes are the best team in the NFC North right now and with a QB next year the bears pack and lions will be fighting for 2,3,4 because the Vikes drafted well on offense and defense and spent wisely in free agency like Van Winkle and other pass rushers who were available.
They like the Steelers will end up with 9 wins because the D kept them in games they should have lost. The packers D loses games for the them as teams pass for success and the pass rush is so so at best

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:47 am

Lions 8 wins
Lots of players missing

Packers 9 wins.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:08 am

Looking at injury updates on NFL.com was funny, it shows Lions with 12, SF with 10, several others with lots, but GB (with 20 on the injury report) with TWO! Only #10 & 2.

There are teams with more stars out for the season than we have.

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:50 am

What’s missing is players who can control the LOS (both sides).

And coaches who can control the players (both sides).

The Packers will never be consistent winners until they have both of the above.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:41 am

That’s an interesting point..."(the packers will never be consistent winners)"

The Packers have been a consistently winning team, and over the past six years with MLF, they’ve had the fourth most wins. Not sure what more you could want besides a Super Bowl, which we all hope for.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:13 am

We went to the NFCCG two years in a row, right? Only one playoff win since moving on from AR12. I'm not pining for him back, just stating the obvious that "the more we could want" is winning in the playoffs, which is possible even without hoisting the Lombardi.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 27, 2025 at 07:38 am

It is conveniently forgotten that, in the early part of the LaFleur era, we really did not have a lot of divisional competition. Perhaps the Vikings and later the beginnings of Detroit’s reemergence. However, the NFCN was typically flat out bad until the last couple of years.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 27, 2025 at 08:52 am

"Only one playoff win since moving on from AR12."

The roster has almost completely turned over in that time, too.
This is a very different team.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 27, 2025 at 08:56 am

Only one playoff win in two seasons. Yeah, that's terrible.

Six trips to the playoffs in seven years. How many other franchises are in that boat?

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:10 am

I agree we lost the last two games in the trenches. Going 1-9 in the red zone might simply be a reflection of that? Or it might be its own problem, I'm not sure.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

December 26, 2025 at 07:55 am

It.Is.About.Time.

It shouldn't take this long to identify the leader(s). Letz say you didn't know anything about football or the Green Bay Packers (just a coincidence if some of you posters think I am referring to you, I am not:).

Letz say all the Packer players and staff are wearing the same clothes without anything differentiating one person from the other. Just observe...could you tell who is (are the leaderz)?

Maybe, it's behind closed doors. Waitttttt, is that a Conway Twitty song? "When we get behind closed doorz,...."

I love my Packers, through Holiday weight and thin.

Yourz and theirz,

PB

0 points
0
0
Lrcole13's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:24 am

Charlie Rich

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:46 am

Thanks dude, I can be sharp as a marble sometimes.

PB

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:26 am

Throw a marble hard enough and it will cut.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:15 am

I go to Cheesehead TV thinking I would find a story saying 'Yes! The Packers Made The Playoffs AGAIN!". Instead I find the usual array of Debbie Downers trying to pick a scab that has healed over.

I think a sizeable number of Packers fans simply like to feel miserable so in some twisted way they can feel good.

Here's another take: after a long and very tough season the Packers have fought through the competition to find themselves among the NFL's best teams. Is that so hard to fathom?

Is the team perfect? No way. No team is. But you look at the winners in the league and you find these elements: exceptional talent coached to maximize effort. The Packers are a deep and talented team, fully capable of beating any team. They have proven that this season.

"Any Given Sunday!"

So, to all the naysayers: "The Packers Are In The Playoffs, AGAIN!" Just sayin'. I will give myself a thumbs down to begin the parade of folks who like to feel miserable who will push the thumbs down.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:20 am

Great take……our fan base is too spoiled! Just try to be a fan of Da Bears, Browns or many others for the past few decades and see how that feels. Us older fans still remember those feelings from the 70-80’s!

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 26, 2025 at 08:57 am

Green Bay promises Super Bowl contention too often when they clearly do not have the OL/DL/CB strength to achieve that goal. Nor do they have QB/receivers to compensate by putting up tons of points on the board. IMO, they should give it their best & stop promising SB's until their trenches are rock solid and they have a competent CB room.There is nothing wrong with being in the top 10. That is where they are but fans believe the hype. I would say Green Bay over-promises and under-delivers too often.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:23 am

Promises? I heard exactly no one promise diddly squat.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:27 pm

But you’re not fooled, not you Nerf Foosball Fan. You’re too smart for that. Not like the benighted Hype-Guzzlers around here who need to be reminded of your oracular powers several times every day.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:37 am

You can't have primo seats at the concert if you don't have tickets, but you can still see the show from the nosebleeds. The goal is to win the Super Bowl, which many of the elite fans around here are quick to point out. You can't win the Super Bowl in November or December (but you can lose a shot at it), and you can't win it if you don't make the playoffs: that's the first hurdle of the round-robin season. Playoff positioning is a result, and winning over the next two weeks could still get the Packers from the nosebleeds to floor seats.

Bottom line is that this team needs to be playing its best ball and be at the best health it can manage in three weeks. They've got plenty of player adjustments and schematic adjustments to make. If they win these next two--even if they don't win the division--they will have won 6 of their final 8, and played well enough in the two losses on the road to higher-end playoff teams to win and give us reason to believe they can compete in the playoffs. Neither the Ravens nor the Vikings are going to lie down, but with a little help from the Niners and Lions the Packers could be at home.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 27, 2025 at 07:41 am

The Vikings are fired up to make their draft position worse. Have to appreciate that as a Packer fan. At least till next week.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 27, 2025 at 08:59 am

After watching Detroit get run over on Thursday, next week will be interesting.

0 points
0
0
Swisch's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:05 am

Hooray for Harry!
Look at the mighty Chiefs and Lions not making the playoffs this season, along with the Vikings.
With Gute and LaFleur, the Packers consistently place among the top teams of the NFL season after season.
We so easily forget their recent run of four straight wins, including the gauntlet of divisional foes in the Vikings and Lions and Bears (oh my!).
The two losses since have still been with good performances by the Packers on the road against two of the best teams of this season.
They actually outplayed the Bears for the most part, even without Micah and then losing Love for most of the game -- until being undone by a flurry of improbable plays: the Jacobs fumble, the onside kick non-recovery, the fourth-down touchdown completion by the Bears, the fumble by Malik, and then in OT a perfect touchdown pass by the Bears QB.
Although it's good to honestly assess the flaws and faults of the Packers, and to call for improvement, this is no time for negativity.
It's time to hearken back to 2010, to rally the troops, and to strive for a run in the playoffs.
I'm excited that we made it into the postseason, while having two games in between to rest the wounded and to work in any needed substitutes.
Lots of good coaching and good playing on these Packers thus far; let's hope they're not discouraged but rather ready to take on all opponents and obstacles!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:22 am

This season has been filled with heartbreak, caused by BAD losses meaning games that really should have been won. No team dominated GB. It can be said that the only team to beat GB is GB. The only thing consistent this season is they haven't done that consistently.

Which gives us absolutely no idea what to expect from the remaining (at least three) games. But I'll agree with you that sliding into the playoffs backwards due to games the Packers did even play in is good news, even though it comes in a strange way.

Hopefully GB continues to play at least as well as they did the last two games, and pulls out some wins ...

GPG!

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

December 27, 2025 at 10:45 pm

I think the gloom is due to them backing in. The recent play is not up to standards and they may be one and done in the playoffs so just how important are the playoffs if you lose?

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:08 am

Alright, alright,....

Who, who is gonna be lil' CindyLouWho on the Packers who is gonna tame the Scrooge of past playoff loses?

Pantz

*there is no whining on forumz such as this. Pleaze, no name calling or trying to put another person'z opinion down just because they are different from yourz.

Letz Chevy, Case the Lombardi trophy baby!,

PB

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

December 26, 2025 at 01:49 pm

bURp, you can't mix Dickens and Seuss. It's dangerous, like crossing the streams when fighting ghosts.

I appreciate your efforts to make this space less abrasive, but for goodness sake, man, be careful out there.

0 points
0
0
the_gavia_pass's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:27 am

CLEAN THE HOUSE.
we are already late.
the problem Is upstairs.
why love Is playing even if everybody can see willis Is much better??? the only reason is he is playing because gutekunst gave him 55 millions per year so he needs to save his ass.
MR Policy, CLEAN the house please.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:47 am

Hafley is exceptional and has been a culture-changer which is a big reason he will be coveted by other teams.

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

December 27, 2025 at 10:43 pm

Not knocking you you feel that way about him but I dont. He had no defensive coaching when he came here. I swear he picked up Barrys play book, read it and is using most of it with some twist but he did learn one thing, these secondary guys cannot play press, so he to uses the zone barry did and recently it hasnt worked too well imo

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:47 am

My thought is the Packers haven't demonstrated they have that "extra gear"....how to push it to 11. Some teams have it. I don't believe that's about coaching: you don't coach "motor" in developed adults...it's about the motor and resilience of individual players. Some teams have that one (or two) guys who they can count on to make that key play and provide that extra gear. Without Parsons, I don't know who that is for GB. They've got two weeks to find that guy and/or figure out where to get that extra gear.

0 points
0
0
MooPack's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:38 am

I agree that this team can’t seem to find that extra gear. Especially in key high pressure moments. However, I have to push back against “ I don't believe that's about coaching.”

A rising tide lifts all boats. That tide is the coaches job. Otherwise they just need a guy who draws up some cutesy plays. Might as well just let an AI computer pick the highest percentage chance for success. No a coach does what that word means - he coaches. A lot of these young men are not fully mature yet. They need molding physically and more importantly mentally. Some have it as you say. Some people are self starters by nature. Good coaches use them to mold the others and rise above adversity.

I’m not going to down thumb because I’ve never done that, but please offer a rebuttal that I’m somehow mischaracterizing what you meant.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

December 26, 2025 at 03:56 pm

Great coaching matters because those recognized as such, have multiple teams they have taken from poor/mediocre to great...as in winning championships.

LaFleur is a good coach again this season. Winning record and in the playoffs.

Is being good...good enough at 1265 Lombardi? Policy will decide and I believe, short of punching a Super Bowl ticket, he will return the GM of Personnel to his prior role being GM of Football Operations.

Then Gutey will decide who the best HC coach of the Packers will be...LaFleur (status quo), Hafley (NFL riser) or someone else.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 27, 2025 at 09:14 am

What I mean is that some players find that extra bit in them in the clutch--that guy who always seems to be the one who makes that key play when it needs to be made based on sheer effort. They can "take it to 11" when the time comes.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:26 am

We can look at every team making the playoffs, and we can easily say that parity is real, but the biased eye refuses to see the difference in play of these teams. The Packers are the friendliest team, as they just won't beat their opponent to the ground, they just want to get a win, and that allows teams the opportunity to not lose. This team hasn't got a killer instinct, especially when they need to show it and declare who they are, no, they shrink Offensively, and play a weaker Defense hoping to survive the assumed quit of the opponent.

This teams' best attribute for opponents, is its deepest weakness, they always leave the door ajar, whether by coaching, or player failings. The mantra in the opponents' locker room, pregame and halftime, The Packers love to leave the door open to be robbed of a win, and it doesn't seem to take much effort.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:33 am

So, the problem is ... GB is too nice? Midwestern nice? The cheese is too good?

Lol I'm not sure this is a valid football explanation but I might know what you mean. Every chance to stick the dagger in and create a convincing win on the scoreboard has been passed up. (Refs handing out unnecessary roughness and other 15 yard calls don't seem to agree with your assessment, but I say several of those were bogus)

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:11 pm

You got it right after your attempt at sarcasm failed. I don't know what 'Midwestern nice' is or means, but I'd say it's no different from anywhere, depending on the person you're dealing with.
The Refs throw more flags on the team that are more prone to committing the penalty, and the Packers are known for doing so, but there is a rule, don't leave the outcome of games to the Refs. Refs make bad calls every game, but you think the Refs are out to get GB, you're delusional, and would cheer every bad call as fine on the opponent. The better team overcomes, adapts, you know, Semper Fi, which you believe not to be in the Packer character with the 'Blame the Refs' bs.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:28 am

What’s missing is full consistency. Going 17-0, with every game won by a score of 35-0.
Then a run through the playoffs and a SB win by a score of 28-7, after which, some fans would be whining about how they underachieved in the Super Bowl, questioning the playcalling, and calling for a major housecleaning.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:06 am

Well, we've clinched a playoff spot with two games remaining. How many teams can say the same thing?

0 points
0
0
MooPack's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:13 am

10 or ~ a third.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 26, 2025 at 04:38 pm

I had to check this. I know you aren't a guy who just throws stuff out there.

If the Packers, at 9-5-1 have already clinched, then obviously anybody with 10 wins or more has clinched in the NFC. Philly and Chicago are division leaders. The West has three teams, the 49ers, Rams and Seahawks, that have 10 wins. And whoever wins the South (currently) Carolina, gets in.

It looks to me like 6 of the 7 spots in the NFC are already spoken for, with only Carolina and Tampa competing for the last spot. AFC looks like a similar deal. It appears that most of the playoff teams have already clinched.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

December 26, 2025 at 11:22 am

It's that time of year when we've almost made it through the hap-happiest time of the year. In my neck of the woods, the weather vacillates between "ugh, it hurts to go outside" and "crap, now everything's covered in ice." It's the time of year when my inner voice calls to me to lie on my side and eat brown food. BUT, there is light in the form of the Green Bay Packers. And, the Green Bay Packers are headed for the playoffs. Again.

I think this team, this group of men, with these coaches, and all the challenges they've faced this year so far is in a position they have never been before. It's not the same as any prior season. Every player and every coach is bringing something new to this collective effort. Nothing stays the same. So, for this team, and for me the direction to look is forward. The Packers have an opportunity to beat the Ravens, and then defeat a Vikings team that will surely want to play spoiler. Go do it, and see where that leads.

GPG

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:14 pm

I don’t know what it is, but gawdanmit ima gonna complain about it.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:17 pm

Maybe it's lack of attention to detail or having the proper mindset in crucial situations. Like, "Nobody is taking this ball away from me when I'm running in the red zone", or "If that onside kick comes my way, that ball is mine, even if I can only smother it and curl up in a fetal position."

0 points
0
0
TheBigCat's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:51 pm

Ken, I believe an organization's success is a function of leadership, which can occur at various levels. The Giants' success in the 1950s was based on the leadership of the DC (Landry) and OC (Lombardi). The 1990s Packers were successful because of Wolf and Holmgren; and once Holmgren was replaced by Rhodes (a HC with an easier manner), things went south in hurry and he lasted only one year. The overnight transformation of the Broncos by Payton is a good example of strong (ruthless?) leadership. It's a long season. Coaches should be intimately familiar with their players' strengths and weaknesses, and place them in situations that will produce individual (and organizational) success. And should know how and when to motivate each player. And the coaches should be very familiar with the strengths and weakness of their opponents, and plan accordingly. I feel good about the Packers' chances this postseason. It's up to MLF to provide the leadership to bring it home.

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

December 27, 2025 at 10:40 pm

Cat you made a good example here. Payton is a good coach but he inherited one of the top defenses in football so when he came on board he only had to fix one thing, the passing game with a QB who can run his system and he found that in Nix.
You look at the avg teams and they are broke on both the D and O and special teams and need over hauls.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:54 pm

"The Lass Word: Something's Missing"

Yes, the something missing part is we haven't had the last word in the last two games.

Don't worry about starting fast, work on finishing strong.

Peace to all and let's have some fun while we are at it.

Reporting as eligible,

Pantz

*as a friendly reminder: if you have been carrying the G for years, make sure to switch hands every now and then so as to not have one arm much longer than the other.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

December 26, 2025 at 03:08 pm

Since Murphy installed the Football Committee in 2018 and made himself Chairman and Acting GM, the Packers have been very status quo. The team will win more than they lose in the regular season and lose more than they win in the playoffs. And as long as the Chairman/GM is satisfied with the results...well, carry on!

Chairman/GM Murphy has been most responsible for the Packers results since 2018. As Captain of the SS Titletown he hired both Gutey and LaFleur into their current roles. Lots of status quo records, coaching, organization structure over this time.

Committees encourage status quo management as long as the Committee is satisfied with the results. I often imagine how Wolf and Ted would have managed the last 6 years. Wolf was not status quo. Ted was at times.

What will Ed's new "policy" be after spending the last Season in the Captain's Chair?

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 26, 2025 at 03:42 pm

From what I see from Policy's interviews, he is a loyal lieutenant of Murphy who seems to be alive and well in Titletown.

0 points
0
0
badaxed's picture

December 27, 2025 at 10:12 pm

What’s missing is a bus ticket for MLF. TIME TO CLEAN HOUSE.

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

December 27, 2025 at 10:32 pm

I hate the negative stuff but if this or any team was perfect there wouldnt be any. IMO and many wont agree, the achiles heel of this team has been the secondary. Poor tackling skills, lack of quickness to play press coverage and the reason for this silly zone D of Hafwits. Valentine cant tackle, Nixon is too slow to the ball and misses assignments via mental mistakes, McKinny plays center field hoping for interceptions but when he has the chance he drops them early and often. And these are the stars of the secondary I'm talking about.

I did not see the game tonight and I know they ran for td's but I would bet the Ravens moved down the field at will via the pass and then ran when close to the goal line.
The bears beat us last week passing like crazy the last three minutes of the game.
People arent beating us with the run, they are beating us with the pass.

My take the packers have two more games this season, next week a loss to the Vikes as their defense is flat out winning games for them and whomever we play in round one. Thats it. Season over because both those loses will be due to secondary play. We can score points and compete but we cant stop good passing teams from scoring the points faster then we do. Again my opine.
Fix that problem and you have a totally different packers team that at least becomes hard to beat.

0 points
0
0
MooPack's picture

December 27, 2025 at 11:00 pm

Ken, That picture may be more prophetic than you realize.

0 points
0
0
PAPackerbacker's picture

December 28, 2025 at 05:10 am

I disagree. It is the coaching. Nothing brilliant about passing on close field goal attempts and going for it on 4th down and turning the ball over. The player talent is there. Penalties are almost predictable when the team gets into scoring position after a long drive. Disipline is missing on both sides of the ball.

0 points
0
0