The NFL’s New Kickoff Rules Still Need to Be Tweaked

The NFL’s new kick return rules still need some tweaks to make them work effectively. Through three preseason games and two regular season games, the best thing you can say about the changes is that they are different. Right now, it seems like more than anything, the rules changes have deprived the Green Bay Packers of a weapon that they have in return specialist Keisean Nixon.

I do give the NFL credit for trying to improve kick returns. Player safety was an issue with plenty of high-speed collisions taking place on kick returns. That’s because players raced down the field at full speed and had impactful collisions as the coverage team tried to break through the blocking wedge and reach the ball carrier.

So, the league cut down the distance and time players had to run and didn’t let them start moving until the ball was caught or landed on the ground. In theory, it reduces the intense high-speed collisions that can cause the most damage to a player’s body.

However, the excitement and game-changing potential of a long kickoff return has been lost thus far this season. After two games, the Packers have returned a grand total of one kick. That return was actually a mistake, a desperate gamble by Nixon late in the loss to the Eagles where Nixon ran the ball back from deep in the end zone to try to make a game-breaking play and set the Packers up with a short field. Instead, he was tackled inside the 30-yard line and took valuable time off the clock.

Officially, Nixon has returned one kick for 24 yards while the opposing team has run back two kickoffs for 38 yards through the first two games of the 2024 season.

One of the stated goals of the new rules was to create more returns albeit with fewer full speed collisions. The hope was that teams would try to place their kicks in the “landing zone” and try to pin opponents inside the 30. Return specialists would still have the opportunity to try to do better than that and bring the ball back beyond the 30-yard line.

Instead, kickoffs have sailed into or even out of the end zone and teams have been content to take over on the 30. Yes, it’s better field position than last year’s rules that placed the ball on the 25, but the difference isn’t significant or game changing. The way the rule is set up right now, it’s simply too easy to kick the ball into the end zone and have the opposing team take over on the 30. So, we’re barely seeing any returns at all.

Teams have yet to figure out a great way to kick off and pin opposing teams deep on a consistent basis without kicking the ball out of bounds. They have also yet to figure out a good way to return kicks for long gains.

The Packers did come close on one of their first kicks against the Eagles. Brayden Narveson kicked off and the ball squibbed inside the 10 and it stayed in bounds. The Eagles Kenneth Gainwell muffed the kick at the four, managed to recover it at the seven and ran it out to the 16.

Was this intentional or did Narveson slip on the terrible turf in Sao Paolo? The risk is great that a squibbed kick lands out of bounds which gives the receiving team the ball at the 40, something no team wants to allow. The Packers have not tried to replicate this method of kicking off since.

The league needs to make the penalty for kicking the ball out of end zone greater if they want to deter teams from doing that most of the time. Maybe taking over at the 35 or even the 40 on touchbacks would force kicking teams to put the ball in play more often. Or maybe the alternative is to just eliminate kickoffs and give teams the ball on the 30 to start every drive. That’s something I don’t want to see given the excitement kick returns can generate.

Hopefully, as the weather gets colder, we’ll hopefully see more kickoffs that are caught in the landing zone and get put in play. Right now, the new rules have helped reduce the number of returns and that’s not a good thing.

The Packers have had a string of great return specialists like Al Carmichael, Travis Williams, Steve Odom, Desmond Howard and now Nixon. We don’t want to see the kick return go the way of the drop kick.

The league still has a chance to figure out how to make these rules work for them or to improve on them in some way. But losing kick returns altogether takes something away from the game. The Packers certainly didn’t pay Nixon all that money not to do what he does best on the field.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (12)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
stockholder's picture

September 19, 2024 at 10:11 am

Trash it - Let's go back.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 19, 2024 at 10:17 am

Kick offs? Kick offs? We don't need no stinking kick offs!

Operationally, there is no kick off game in the NFL now. May as well just start the other team at the 30 after a score and forget going through the motions.

Or move the start to the 35, even the 40 after the end zone kick.

Or go back yesteryear, unless the kick off play is truly a mounting list of injured players. I have never seen the stats on this. Maybe it is.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

September 19, 2024 at 10:23 am

Just move the kicker back 10 yards on the kickoff. Problem solved.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 19, 2024 at 12:06 pm

Go back 20 and disincentivize non returns by setting the touch back start at the 20. That should make it a challenge for most kickers and give teams reasons to try to improve position. At the moment there is little to no risk of a kicker not getting it out or for a returning team to just let it go.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 19, 2024 at 01:05 pm

The current rules favor teams with stronger defenses. Kick it through the end zone, limit the chance for a fluke return or penalty that stakes an opponent to 7 or a FG attempt, and put your playmakers on the field.

They've been trying to disincentivize returns and special teams injuries over the years, and this has the look of a success.

0 points
0
0
marpag1's picture

September 19, 2024 at 02:49 pm

"this has the look of a success..."

Yes, if success is defined as avoiding injuries. A very, very boring success.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 19, 2024 at 05:24 pm

If this is success as they really define it, then scrap the whole thing. I agree it’s just dull and wastes time. If that’s what you want the either just start drives at the 20 (I think 30 is too far with kickers these days) or move the kick way back and have the spot where it lands or 30 yard line, whichever is further from the kick point. If not, keep the formation rules and make it harder to get a kick back and disincentivize accepting one. Just not the current rule!

0 points
0
0
jurp's picture

September 20, 2024 at 05:08 pm

Just pick up the rule from the CFL that gives the kicking team a point if a ball is downed in the end zone or goes out of the end zone. In the NFL's case, they'd have to move the kickoff back as well to make it harder to kick it out on the fly, but no coach will want to give up that point.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

September 19, 2024 at 12:45 pm

Change one aspect only. Any kickoffs that go into the EZ start at the 40, period. Put the ball in play, or pay with field position.

0 points
0
0
Ferrari-Driver's picture

September 19, 2024 at 04:17 pm

The days of Green Bay Packers Travis Williams exciting kick off returns would not have happened in today's game. Unfortunately, that historic and sometimes exciting aspect of the game is no longer present with this year's kick off rules. When Gil says "tweak" it just seems like a big understatement to me.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

September 19, 2024 at 05:30 pm

I think it's crazy to sit there and think of ways that you can give the bottom of your roster more opportunities to lose the game for you.

0 points
0
0
canadapacker's picture

September 19, 2024 at 07:00 pm

Trash it - trash it and completely trash it. I find it very hypocritical that they tinker with the kick offs - claiming trying to protect against injuries all the while have a whole bunch of Thursday night games most with very little time in between games. It would be much better to make sure that any team playing Thursday night either is coming off a bye ( and add a bye week and give teams two byes a season) or make sure that teams especially early in the season play only noon games before a Thursday night game. I am sure that the schedule makers could fix these issues. But no - screw up the game with diddly squat moves. I know that the owners would not like this but increase the roster size to allow for more core special teams guys to suit up on special teams - cheaper than losing higher paid salary guys.

0 points
0
0