Who Are the Green Bay Packers’ Building Block Players?
Who are the "keepers" and the "walkers" on the Packers' roster?
There’s been a lot of speculation over the futures of Head Coach Matt LaFleur and General Manager Brian Gutekunst since the Green Bay Packers’ epic 4th quarter collapse against the rival Chicago Bears on Wild Card Weekend. Regardless of whether Team President Ed Policy stays the course for year 8 of the LaFleur era or not, whoever’s leading this team is going to have to rely on “building block” players. These are the guys that are worth giving the bag to, often at a market-setting rate.
For the purposes of this exercise, I’m not considering a player’s potential for more than the next 4 seasons. I’m also asserting that the typical NFL team can only afford to seriously pay 11 guys given cap constraints. I arrived at this number by analyzing how many veterans are currently set to have a larger cap hit in 2026 than a team’s top earner on a rookie contract, and I limited my analysis to the NFC North teams, the team with the most 2026 cap space, the team with the least 2026 cap space, and the most recent Super Bowl champions. So who are the 11 guys that Green Bay should build around?
Locked and Loaded
-
Micah Parsons
-
Zach Tom
-
Jordan Love
-
Xavier McKinney
The current contracts, ages, and overall performance of Micah Parsons, Zach Tom, Jordan Love, and Xavier McKinney all but guarantee that they’ll be the anchors of the team for the next 3-4 years. Jordan Love and Micah Parsons will need extensions to make their contracts palatable by the end of this window, but Green Bay’s not letting them go anywhere. Safety Xavier McKinney is the one iffy guy on this list, as his current deal ends after the 2027 season and he’ll be 29 years old heading into 2028, plus he plays a less premium position than the other guys. That said, he is elite and safeties tend to play well into their 30s.
Promising and Paid For
-
Matthew Golden
-
Anthony Belton
NOTE: These two are worth calling out as building block players, but they DO NOT count toward the 11 paid veterans criteria, given their rookie contract status.
The Packers’ 1st and 2nd round picks from the 2025 NFL draft are both tied up with affordable rookie deals for the next three years, and WR Matthew Golden could warrant the club’s 5th year option as he eats up the snaps of the many receivers that will be departing Green Bay over the next two years. While neither of these players have proven themselves to be difference-makers yet, both showed a lot of promise when given opportunities by a coaching staff that’s notoriously averse to playing rookies.
Back Up the Brink’s Truck
-
Tucker Kraft
-
Evan Williams
-
Javon Bullard
-
Edgerrin Cooper
You won’t find many Packers fans who weren’t impressed with the 2025 performance of Tucker Kraft, Evan Williams, Javon Bullard, and Edgerrin Cooper. Every one of these youngsters has shown elite capability for stretches and have proven that they can at least be relied upon as consistent, above-average starters. Kraft’s torn ACL carries some concern with it, but given his role as an emerging leader on the team and how dire Green Bay’s tight end situation has been for the majority of the 21st century, I think it would be unwise to wait on an extension and risk losing Tuck after the 2026 season.
Probably Stuck with Them
-
Aaron Banks
-
Nate Hobbs
Now the not-so-fun part. Assuming that the Packers pay any of the guys from the preceding section of this article, they’re probably already parting ways with most or all of Elgton Jenkins, Trevon Diggs, Josh Jacobs, Keisean Nixon, Isaiah McDuffie, Rashan Gary, and Brandon McManus over the next two years. Each one of these aging and/or under-performing players has a contract out where cutting them would offer cap savings significantly greater than the dead cap hit. 2025 free agent disappointments Aaron Banks and Nate Hobbs? Technically they could both be cut for very minimal savings in 2026, but when you factor in the cost of replacing them, even with players on veteran minimum contracts, it just doesn’t make financial sense. Green Bay is likely stuck with these signings for at least another couple years and will just have to hope that injuries were the reason for such lackluster performances this past season.
Choices
-
Christian Watson
-
Jayden Reed
-
Jordan Morgan
-
Rasheed Walker
-
Quay Walker
For those of you who’ve been keeping tabs, we’ve accounted for 10 veterans that the Packers are likely to invest in. So which of these 5 guys deserves the final paycheck? Christian Watson unquestionably ascended to WR1 in the Packers’ offense this past season, but he’s never been a high volume guy and he has a looooonnnng history of injury. Jayden Reed looked like an unconventional WR1 for parts of his first two years, but has also completely disappeared for months at a time, has dealt with drops, and is now racking up his own injury history. Would you feel comfortable handing either of these guys a deal in the range of Tee Higgins’ $28,750,000 annual average, or even Chris Godwin’s $22,000,000? These are the going rates for borderline WR1s.
What about Jordan Morgan? He does have 2 more years under contract, as well as the 5th year option if the Green Bay brass thinks he’s worth paying top-15 tackle money, but this is a guy who got benched for a rookie earlier this season and who’s never impressed when he has seen the field. Can the Packers really feel comfortable just giving Morgan a pat on the behind and praying that he’ll look like an NFL-caliber player protecting Jordan Love’s blindside just because “that’s his natural spot”?
That brings us to this offseason’s marquee free-agents: LT Rasheed Walker and MLB Quay Walker. Both have helped this team play winning football and started a lot of games for the green and gold. Both have also looked woefully below-average in key areas of their game. It’s difficult to call either a difference-maker based on the 4 years of tape they’ve produced.
Maybe none of these five players are worth paying? Maybe rolling the dice on free agent gold like Xavier McKinney or Josh Jacobs is the way to go, even if it requires some kicking of the cap can down the road this year or simply waiting a year for a pretty loaded 2027 free agent class.
Where Are the Shelves Bare?
So where does that leave Packers Nation? These are the core guys:
-
Micah Parsons - DE
-
Zach Tom - OT
-
Jordan Love - QB
-
Xavier McKinney - FS
-
Matthew Golden - WR
-
Anthony Belton - OG
-
Tucker Kraft - TE
-
Evan Williams - SS
-
Javon Bullard - NB
-
Edgerrin Cooper - LB
-
Aaron Banks - OG
-
Nate Hobbs - NB
-
Predicting home-grown Christian Watson gets extended - WR
It’s clear that whoever’s leading the Packers for the next few seasons is going to have to count on slam-dunk rookies, sleeper veterans, or dramatic internal roster growth to provide game-changing snaps at center, offensive tackle, running back, defensive tackle, outside cornerback, and kicker, at the very least.
The good news is that Micah Parsons, Zach Tom, and Jordan Love give the Packers a rock solid foundation at the sport’s most important positions. And the prospect of paying big bucks for another 4 studs actually isn’t that bad of a position to be in. How does that outlook compare to the team’s NFC North rivals?
Compared to the Bears
The Bears do have QB Caleb Williams under contract for the next 2 years with the 5th year option extending that window to 3 years, but they’re going to have to pay OT Darnell Wright big money before 2028 and they don’t have a young pass rusher worth paying. As if that weren’t bad enough for Bears fans, here’s their list of the rest of their above-average or promising starters whose contracts expire within the next 2 years: SS Jaquan Brisker, CB Nahshon Wright, NB Chauncey Gardner-Johnson, RB D’Andre Swift, DE Montez Sweat, CB Jaylon Johnson, OG Joe Thuney, OG Jonah Jackson, DT Grady Jarrett, C Drew Dalman, LB TJ Edwards, and DE Austin Booker. Including Williams and Wright, that’s a total of 14 starters who will be expecting new contracts. The Bears are going to lose a lot of talent very soon.
Compared to the Lions
The Lions are in good shape at the most critical positions, as Jared Goff, Penei Sewell, and Aidan Hutchinson are all locked up for years to come. Having said that, here’s the list of major upcoming free agents that they’re going to struggle to retain over the next 2 years: DT DJ Reader, LB Alex Anzalone, TE Sam LaPorta, SS Brian Branch, OT Taylor Decker, RB David Montgomery, CB DJ Reed, RB Jahmyr Gibbs, and LB Jack Campbell. 9 starter-level players. Do you think the Lions will regret giving WR2 Jameson Williams nearly $27,000,000 per year if they lose Jahmyr Gibbs over it?
Compared to the Vikings
Things don’t look so good for the Vikings if QB JJ McCarthy doesn’t turn things around in year 3. They’ve got OT Christian Darrisaw locked up, but none of their edge rushers are elite and their starters are 31 and 29 years old entering the 2026 season. Taking a peek at the talent exodus coming in Minnesota, here are some of the more notable expiring contracts in the next 2 years: OT Brian O’Neill, DT Javon Hargrave, OLB Andrew Van Ginkel, RB Aaron Jones, C Ryan Kelly, LB Blake Cashman, RB Jordan Mason, TE TJ Hockenson, DT Jonathan Allen, OLB Jonathan Greenard, CB Byron Murphy, K Will Reichard, and WR Jordan Addison. 13 starter-level players.
What Does it All Mean?
When compared to their most important competitors, the Packers are actually in pretty good shape over the next several years. Sure, they’re going to lose some key starters, and they’re probably stuck with one or two bad contracts, but a talented core is there and any coach would be thrilled to lead a team with so many key building blocks in place. At the positions of upcoming weakness for the Packers, it’s not uncommon to find day 2 and 3 offensive linemen and running backs in the draft who can start from day 1, or close to it. Finding quality defensive tackles and cornerbacks to build around will likely be Green Bay’s biggest challenge in the near future, but in the salary cap era, every team has at least one Achilles’ heel.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cody Cottrell is a proud shareholder of the greatest sports franchise on Earth, the Green Bay Packers. He's also a complicated fella who loves writing a good hot take.
__________________________




Comments (18)
the_gavia_pass
January 16, 2026 at 10:05 am
micah parsons. stop.
dobber
January 16, 2026 at 10:15 am
"Jordan Love and Micah Parsons will need extensions to make their contracts palatable by the end of this window"
I expect one, the other, or both to be cut or traded after 2027 and before the balloon payments on those mortgages come due. Maybe they extend Love if he's playing well to push out the cost, but QBs will play well into their 30s and Parsons will be starting to physically decline.
"I think it would be unwise to wait on an extension and risk losing Tuck after the 2026 season."
They can keep the first couple years of an extension pretty affordable with bonus structures further down the line for any of the players in this category.
"Probably Stuck with Them"
I don't think that Nate Hobbs will be invited back for 2026. As I've been saying: you can't cut everyone, but I think they can replace him with a draft pick on day 2 and that gets Hobbs off the books for 2027. They could do a Jun 1 cut and wait to see how the draft shakes out, but his injury track record held up and he was a mis-match for what they asked him to do. I think Banks is back. He's an NFL body at a position where they're already losing too much.
"That brings us to this offseason’s marquee free-agents: LT Rasheed Walker"
Too many lapses later in the season--he looked checked-out at times. We already knew he wouldn't be back.
"MLB Quay Walker. "
Let him go. He's mis-cast as an MLB in the Packers' base (I've been saying for years he's a chase/WLB) and doesn't bring enough coverage chops for the 4-2-5. Hopper might not be as big or fast, but I don't think he'll be a step down. You can't replace everyone and you can't put every expectation on the draft, but there are good LBs in this upcoming draft, too.
"It’s clear that whoever’s leading the Packers for the next few seasons is going to have to count on slam-dunk rookies, ...at the very least."
They're going to have to be coaching these guys well, yes. It's time to up the game in that category.
"Compared to..."
The Packers have relied heavily on churn and planning for replacement. The "youngest team" thing isn't an excuse, it's Gute's MO for team building post ARod and Bakh contracts, and why we're reading this article. It relies on good coaching, finding good developmental pieces, and planning for replacement.
I don't think what we're outlining for the Packers and the other NFCN teams is really unusual: everyone is trying to draft pieces and everyone is looking at succession plans and filling with vets. It's biting the Vikes on the ass now--virtually all the players you mention are "old" by league standards. There's no replacement depth. They need to bail and rebuild. The Lions are getting into that spot. The Bears are a hybrid where many of the players exiting in the next two years are second and third contract guys who they need to draft to replace, anyway. They have some developmental pieces, but need to draft well.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 16, 2026 at 11:03 am
Hobbs will be interesting. We have a surplus of slot defenders. Does Gutey keep both #25 and Hobbs? That seems unlikely, the need for boundary CB is too great.
I'm not betting on #1 declining physically at any set point in time, just like I'm not betting against Mahommes. That said he didn't make the playoffs this year and Father Time hasn't lost yet. Big Dog has retired, but he's almost 42; an amazing career but #1 is even more of an athletic freak.
The BIG thing is to focus on a coaching staff that excels at player development; the main reason I went to my first TC (actually 3 days) was to see what they're doing with O linemen. I didn't come away with anything I was impressed with, and the ensuing seasons confirmed that further. Hopefully Ed Policy focuses on this ...
dobber
January 17, 2026 at 08:28 am
I keep coming back to guys like Julius Peppers who were athletic freaks who played well for a long time but were also incredibly durable. He never missed more than 2 games in a season, so he never had to recover from serious injury or deal with the impacts that come with it.
At some point Parsons is going to need an extension, and the Packers have to decide whether they want to marry themselves to to that. Parsons' contract is an odd one in how it's structured. The cash value is small year-by-year until the last year when it becomes huge, but there's not much to restructure to save cap. He's actually pretty cap friendly for 2026 given his prowess as a player, and with the cap going up 2027 is high but not brutal. So my perspective is more one of contract, and the return that could be gained on the trade market--that might be needed to help reset the next window for this team.
splitpea1
January 16, 2026 at 10:28 am
No mention of Romeo Doubs? I guess it's a foregone conclusion that's he won't be back, but Jordan Love probably considers him to be a core player. Oh well, he'll have to starting developing the same chemistry with Golden; long overdue!
No mention of Wicks, either. I think he's still useful for depth. Jayden Reed is a nice player, but in no way is he worth Higgins money. Watson, although he really came through in the stretch, is still a risky long-term signing.
No way they pay Rasheed Walker. Morgan at least has value as a swing tackle and can be a placeholder while the Packers draft another tackle, which I expect them to do. You never know, Morgan could improve and lock down the job.
Cooper: Another talented player, but I would really like to see more impact plays; hopefully a big breakout is coming.
Quay: Why are the Packers so enamored with him? There's too may times where he looks confused, in outer space, or is slow to react. He's been in the league four years now and I would expect better. Move on and avoid a long term extension, even if it's at the cheaper end.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 16, 2026 at 11:05 am
#7 has never been a true MLB. Is Cooper? If Quay is directed by Cooper instead of wearing the green dot he might be surprisingly salvageable.
stockholder
January 16, 2026 at 10:39 am
Building Blocks- ?
I'm not suffering from PTSD -like symptoms-
over MLF playoff record.---- Give me MLF.
Now with that said-
What are you willing to pay for the building blocks?
Under Gute; we've had financial insecurity.
TT was Frugal, and a lot more
resourceful, and economical with money.
So whats the next psychological boost:
Gute will keep spending money.
But whats happening; is other teams
are profiting off the packers discards now.
The reality is; who is going to be on the field.
And keeping the cupboard full should be the answer.
Since'61
January 16, 2026 at 11:00 am
If I were the Packers I would move on from Rasheed Walker and Quay Walker. Also I would try to move on from Banks and Hobbs. I might give Hobbs a pass based on his injuries during the 2025 season. As for the other core guys discussed in the article I agree with keeping them. The Packers need core players and players who can provide leadership on the field.
I have concerns about Kraft and Tom returning at 100% from their respective injuries but time will tell. GPG! Thanks, Since '61
stockholder
January 16, 2026 at 11:09 am
If you have concerns about Tom
Why would you not want to keep walker.
(As a lot of people that grade the packers, are suggesting)
Quay and Cooper are the glue to the defense.
Gary is not.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 16, 2026 at 11:11 am
Rasheed Walker has played ok at times but outright SUCKED later in this past season. Is he still one of the best 8? 10? And how would anyone really know? There SHOULD BE a number of O linemen really improving ...
stockholder
January 16, 2026 at 11:27 am
I suggested those who want walker signed are right.
Morgan got praised at RT.
Walker is a battler and took on the best.
Tom's injury history at RT is what it is now.
I Prefer signing him and dumping Banks.
TT dumped Guards and brought in new.
He never over-paid the guard position.
Since'61
January 17, 2026 at 12:36 pm
I believe that Walker will be too expensive given the level of protection he provides or rather the lack of protection. He will probably try FA and get more from another team than the Packers would or should offer.
As for Quay Walker he runs himself out of too many plays and he is not very good at getting off of blocks. Most of his tackles are 5 yards or more beyond the LOS. He is not very good in pass coverage either. He is also another guy who will get a better offer in FA than the Packers are willing to pay. Thanks, Since '61
SicSemperTyrannis
January 16, 2026 at 11:09 am
#9 and 11 returning from their injuries at least as good as ever is encouraging. #85 and 1 all have the same injury as 9. Wyatt is more complex. Tom's type of injury hasn't had the drastically improved track record of ACL injuries, we really can't afford to lose his best ...
TKWorldWide
January 16, 2026 at 01:30 pm
So you’d let both Walkers walk?
Poetic.
13TimeChamps
January 16, 2026 at 11:25 am
I think Tucker Kraft is pretty much the heart and soul of the offense, just as Parsons is for the defense. A big part of the reason for that is his somewhat reckless abandon approach to the game, daring defenses to bring him down. I wonder if his ACL injury might make him a little more hesitant going forward, which would be understandable. Gotta love that guy's heart.
BuckyBadger
January 16, 2026 at 11:57 am
Players come back from ACL fairly well. I wouldn't expect much decline with his age.
BuckyBadger
January 16, 2026 at 12:00 pm
The Packers still have the best roster if they can get healthy. On offense they will have to invest a 3rd and/or 4th picks there but after that they they are solid. Might want to start looking for another RB as Jacobs has a lot miles on him. The defense should be fine as well. Will have to look at investing a pick at CB and hopefully bring in a big body for the DL but they have enough talent to pressure QBs. I think in August the Packers will be the favorites to win the North.
Leatherhead
January 16, 2026 at 12:21 pm
Three or four years is a long time, and would depend on what got accomplished.
But for next year, we have people under contact. We start with Love and Jacobs. We return two veteran TEs, Kraft and Musgrave. And at WR, we have Watson, Reed, Golden, Wicks, and Williams all under contract.
On the Oline, we have Tom, Belton, Banks, Morgan, Jenkins, and a couple of practice squad guys I've never heard of,
Those are our starters and main backups. Replace Willis and Wilson(who I think we'll lose to FA), and we're around 20. We carry 25 offensive guys, and dress 21.
So, that's what we're starting with on offense, unless you want to throw people away. Since Walker and Rhyan are both FAs, and Jenkins is an attractive target for a salary cap related cut, this is an opportunity rebuild the line. Replace Walker and Rhyan with people who are better, and replace Jenkins with someone younger, without an injury history, and $20M cheaper.
On defense, it's a little different. We're very well set at Safety. At CB, we have 5 under contract for next year: Valentine, Diggs, Nixon, Hobbs, and Bartholomew. Diggs can be kept for $15M, or he could be released and we'd have another $15M to spend.
At linebacker, Walker will have to be retained or replaced. Combined with Cooper and McDuffie, that's a pretty good rotation at ILB over a 17 game season. Cooper is a bargain for two more years. Mcduffie has one year remaining.
The defensive line is where the question marks start adding up. At DE, Parsons, Gary, VanNess, Sorrell, and Oliver are all under contract, but Enagbare will have to be retained or replaced.
At DT, we have Wyatt , Wooden, Brooks, and a bunch of guys. I think the Packers are really hoping that Brinson, or Stackhouse, or Riley, can be a player .
So regardless of who the HC is (LaFleur), or who the DC is (not Hafley), this is what's in the pantry. It's not like the cupboards are bare. We do have to retain or replace about 8 guys, and that's before we release anybody for costing too much or not being 'good enough'.