Cory's Corner: Patience Is Needed With MarShawn Lloyd
Injuries have taken their toll on the third round pick. But don't give up on the USC standout.

I can just hear the song, “Oops! … I Did It Again,” being played on a loop in my head.
MarShawn Lloyd came to the Packers with a lot of promise as a third round pick in the 2024 NFL Draft after averaging over 7 yards a carry at USC.
However, the moment he put on the green and gold, he suffered a hip injury, which forced him to miss the early portions of the 2024 training camp. Then he suffered a hamstring sprain in the preseason opener. In Week 2, he suffered a grade 2 ankle sprain, which led to him being placed on injured reserve. In November, he was diagnosed with appendicitis and had to undergo an emergency appendectomy. He was moved to the non-football injury/illness list and didn’t play again in 2024.
This past offseason, the Packers sent Lloyd to UW-Madison to get evaluated at the Badger Athletic Performance facility, which was where Christian Watson went to get evaluated for his oft-injured hamstrings.
Things were going good in camp until he missed the preseason opener with a groin injury and then he suffered a hamstring injury at Indianapolis this past Saturday.
The cryptic quote from Packers coach Matt LaFleur didn’t say much but it said a lot. “He’s going to miss some time.”
And we all know that hamstring injuries are soft tissue and have a tendency to flare up throughout the rest of the season. That’s why this injury hurts so much. It’s not just because Lloyd has had a checkered past with injuries. It’s because this could very well nag at him throughout the rest of the season.
There is a reason why the Packers drafted him. He brings that rare blend of speed, vision and the willingness to run through contact.
However, do the Packers really know what they have in Lloyd? They’ve seen all of his highlights as he makes defensive players look silly. But none of that has translated to Green Bay yet.
And now the Packers and Lloyd are in a weird position. Do the Packers rush Lloyd back quickly in an effort to capitalize on his athleticism, while risking another injury? Or do they let him sit for a long period of time, knowing that the longer he sits out, the longer it might take to get him back to his regular quick-cutting self?
That’s a tough call. At this point, the smart answer is to just sit longer and take your time. Lloyd has already been stung by enough injury bugs. The Packers need to see him healthy — even if that means putting the running back room a little thin at depth.
I loved the Lloyd pick last year. It was a solid choice and he has said numerous times how excited he is to be in Green Bay. Unfortunately, the most important ability in the NFL is availability — and he just hasn’t been around enough to make a viable impact.
I’ve heard and read that the Packers should give up on Lloyd. That’s the wrong answer for a guy that is only 24. He is under contract until 2027 with cap hits of $1.2 million in 2025, $1.5 million in 2026 and $1.8 million in 2027. That’s peanuts in today’s NFL.
Lloyd also has the attitude that he wants to prove everyone wrong that already has him labeled as an injury risk.
I still think he can succeed in this league, it will just take patience — from both sides.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn
__________________________




Comments (91)
NickPerry
August 19, 2025 at 07:10 am
Losing Lloyd AGAIN was a real bummer. I was really looking forward to what a one / two punch Jacobs and Lloyd would be like on the field this season. Wilson and Brooks have done a nice job when called upon, but IF we ever get to see the Marshawn Lloyd I saw at USC, Lloyd will deliver something much better than "a nice job".
Personally I'd sit Lloyd longer to give him the best shot to contribute THIS season. Good luck young man, get healthy!
barutanseijin
August 19, 2025 at 08:35 am
Odds are you will never see the USC version of Lloyd again, for the simple reason that he’s playing against bigger, faster and stronger defenders. It looks like keeping up with NFL training camp level competition takes him beyond his body’s limits.
Mister Chievous
August 19, 2025 at 12:36 pm
Wilson is way better than brooks
WD
August 19, 2025 at 05:33 pm
And Amar Johnson is way better that both of them.
Cheezehead72
August 19, 2025 at 07:23 am
Do not rush him back. Put him on the reserve PUP before the cutdown and let him heal up. We have Jacobs, Wilson, and Brooks. We also have Abanikanda who has looked serviceable.
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 07:49 am
We can’t put him on PuP as he’s already practiced. We can now nominate 2 players as direct to IR and eligible to return at cut downs without waiver. The question is now, unfortunately, which 2 players? Players put on IR before waivers cannot play for us this year.
Some of that depends on how long they expect a player to be out. If it’s a week or 2 they may just roster them and leave them inactive. If they are not sure they will make it back then they may not spend a designation on them.
For some the waive and resign and put on IR from the initial 53 option also exists (they can reactivate a total of 8 from IR during the season—the 2 protected do not actually have to be), if they don’t get claimed. Lloyd is probably too high a pick to risk that, but others may not be. Gute is going to have to make some tactical gambles potentially.
How much do they think of Amar Johnson? He’s a 4.4 runner as opposed to a 4.46, though he is 15 pounds lighter. He is probably better in protection at this point.
Do they see Johnson as capable of filling the role they had earmarked for Lloyd well enough to start out with him on the roster and see how things go with him and Lloyd’s help? They could try to waive Johnson too, hope he’s not claimed, and elevate him for 3 games to buy time for that. If he does well though, they might face a claim and be forced to make space for him.
Cheezehead72
August 19, 2025 at 09:14 am
My mistake but the key is they need to be careful and he could be one of the two that comeback from IR. The key is that they need to put him on IR so they can save him. If they need him to be one of the two coming back then bring him back or keep him on IR if they can. Yes that means that if he gets healthy they have to bring him back or release him. It is one of those chess moves the GM has to make.
It would hurt this team not to put him on IR at cutoff because that means they have an injured player on the roster with an injury that can linger.
WD
August 19, 2025 at 05:36 pm
Amar Johnson is the only one who is a threat to score every time he touches the ball. He is the clear replacement for Lloyd. Watch the film.
WD
August 20, 2025 at 06:35 am
You would have to be blind to not include Amar Johnson in the mix
Cheezehead72
August 19, 2025 at 07:26 am
I got a question. Watching last nights game I noticed a runner getting hit and tackled in the endzone. When is it a penalty? If he was hit like that on the sideline it would be a penalty. Once the ball touches the plain of the endzone it is a TD and the play is dead. Why the inconsistency?
egbertsouse
August 19, 2025 at 07:58 am
Because it’s the NFL. Did you see the last play by the Colts? The announcers thought it was a TD, the ref called it a completion at the one, and the replay official said incomplete pass. Each game is a crapshoot in the NFL.
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 08:08 am
If a runner in possession of the ball (ie not bobbling it) is tackled in the end zone it’s a TD. However, if the motion to tackle started before the runner broke the plane then the tackle is legal, just ineffectual. After that, it’s at least unnecessary roughness technically.
GregC
August 19, 2025 at 08:18 am
The refs seem to be more lax on calling late hits in the end zone, compared to calling them on the sidelines. Maybe they want to give defenders the benefit of the doubt when they are trying to make a TD-saving play. But I agree that they should probably flag players for some of those hits in the end zone. I didn't see the one last night.
Cheezehead72
August 19, 2025 at 09:17 am
Last night's was close but the defender probably knew he made a touchdown. I have seen worse not called. The defender should know where the endzone is.
LeotisHarris
August 19, 2025 at 03:08 pm
Forever lax. Can't forget how the Cowboy's MIke Gaechter was not flagged for his hit on Boyd Dowler in the end zone in the 1966 NFL Championship. Dowler hurt his shoulder on the play.
Bitternotsour
August 19, 2025 at 04:07 pm
if memory serves, that hit on Dowler was legal in 1966. I think they changed the rule after that very play.
LeotisHarris
August 19, 2025 at 04:18 pm
Immediately after the play?
Bitternotsour
August 19, 2025 at 04:22 pm
i believe they went into executive session, yes.
LeotisHarris
August 19, 2025 at 04:37 pm
I suppose the Rules Committee was smaller in those days, and Rozelle was a man of action. Oh, how I pine for simpler times.
Guam
August 19, 2025 at 07:28 am
One of the best talents is availability, something Lloyd seems to be lacking. I'm not saying give up on the kid, but at some point he has to be able to play. He can't help the team from the trainer's room.
Not sure why the kid has been so fragile in the pros as I didn't see anything in his college career that indicated he would be injury prone. Hopefully he can get right and contribute this season. If he spends another season on IR, he will very much be under the microscope next year. Cory is correct that he isn't costing the Packers much so this is not a Jaire Alexander situation, but he still has to be able to contribute eventually or continued employment is pointless.
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 08:19 am
Hamstrings are a worry as they have a tendency to recover slowly and be prone to reaggravation after return. Unfortunately, we have a number of players with that issue. Lloyd though has now a bit of a history with his. I think this is an occasion when very detailed individual medical assessment is required. Since we won’t see that, we will just have to wait and see though.
I admit that my gut instinct says Lloyd and Williams should just be shut down and use the 2 straight-to-IR options to keep options open for a mid season reboot if fully recovered. However, that depends on who else may need to go on IR and how integral they are to our plans and depth. Sorrell perhaps, for example.
Guam
August 19, 2025 at 08:40 am
Cory indicated Lloyd has already had that detailed medical assessment done at UW Madison (the same group that helped C. Watson recover from his recurring hamstring issues) so I am not sure how much else there is to do along those lines. I assume Lloyd was doing the things recommended by his UW team.
You are spot on that once injured, a hammy is a lengthy recovery. They shouldn't hurry him back as a reinjury would be highly likely. That's why he may be a candidate for yearlong IR if the hammy pull is serious. As a seventh rounder, Williams could probably use a red shirt year. Sorrell they will want back on the field asap. I suspect Lloyd's status will depend on the severity of his injury and who else gets injured before the season starts.
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 10:31 am
I know he had an assessment done, but we don’t know how bad the current tear is. A sprain or worse? That’s critical information to overlay on any past medical insight in his case, but for anyone with a hamstring injury if we are trying to determine the possibility and timing of a successful return.
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2025 at 01:28 pm
I admit I was intrigued with Lloyd being the change up to pounding the D with the fastball JJ. Due to constant reinforcement of all teasing, no pleasing with Lloyd's invisibility, now it's just "whatever".
The RB room, sans Lloyd is loaded nonetheless. That excites me...the starting 5 on the OL can all run block well. The young talent after JJ, Wilson, Brooks...Johnson and Abanikanda...look good. Put one on the 53 and the other to the PS. Haven't seen enough of Davis-Price...maybe he's a PS candidate.
Johnson, "when" he makes the 53, would be the smallest RB on the roster at 5'10" 205. He'd likely have a chance to replace the Lloyd "changeup" attack if he continues to impress Sirmans (one of the best Packer Coaches IMO) and LaFleur. He has shifty, quick power. Gets low through the hole with good feet to use his blockers and once he cuts, shows a burst off his 4.4 speed. In addition to his 3100 rushing yards and 23 TDs, he also caught 53 passes at SDSU.
Abanikanda is a nice looking power back with speed too...4.45! Not as shifty as Johnson, a terrific athlete with solid production at Pitt.
I don't want to lose either of these guys...especially for the Packers who run the ball over half their snaps.
nagawicka
August 19, 2025 at 08:39 am
Availability? It's football, players get dinged up, and you can't expect otherwise. Can't mess around with hamstrings. Pushing him for an early return is more likely to result in a career cut short plagued by injuries. Bring him along slowly to heal the root cause once & for all, and Lloyd's likely to be good to go for the foreseeable future. With four other backs ready to roll, there's no advantage to be gained by fking this up by labeling him 'fragile' or playing him injured, neither of which tracks as sound football or smart management.
I get Eddie Lee Ivery PTSD but the Packers are in the catbird's seat on this, with all the time in the world to get a guy under contract ready to play.
Guam
August 19, 2025 at 08:47 am
"Bring him along slowly to heal the root cause once and for all and Lloyd's likely to good to go for the foreseeable future."
That's what they said last year when they shut him down and sent him to UW-Madison for hamstring evaluation. Rinse and repeat..........
Availability.
nagawicka
August 20, 2025 at 09:08 am
Sure. Like every team does with every player whose *availability* they value. Whose skill they value. And who they've invested their expertise adn acumen in, because they know what he can do. Go ahead and throw away the whole Cadillac because that guy in Jersey scratched the paint.
TKWorldWide
August 19, 2025 at 03:13 pm
I heard an interview with one of the doctors who performs the physicals every year at the Combine. They asked him if he can predict which players are more prone to injury based on the exam. His answer was, “Absolutely not.”
I feel bad for Lloyd. I’d even go so far as to say he wants to get healthy and play even more than we want him to.
stockholder
August 19, 2025 at 07:38 am
What did AJ Dillon teach you?
Often injured doesn't work.
Not now , not later.
I get cutting a draft pick is sensitive.
But if Gute can get rid of Aaron Jones.
Just accept it.
nagawicka
August 19, 2025 at 08:54 am
Accurate. However, these are two different players. LIterally, not only TWO (2) numerically distinct physical bodies, but who're also defined by categorically different atheletic profiles. The weightlifting fullback-- stronger quads, Quadzilla! -- vs a freakin runner who flies like a deer. Not the same thing.
No cure for those suffering from Eddie Lee Ivery PSTD. You'll just have to lump it.
dblbogey
August 19, 2025 at 11:27 am
You misspelled Dillon and Aaron Jones.
Just accept it.
stockholder
August 19, 2025 at 12:00 pm
- It's important to be respectful.
Isn't it.
nagawicka
August 20, 2025 at 09:10 am
If it were important to you, your 'assessments' would incorporate a droplet of respect.
jannesbjornson
August 19, 2025 at 06:00 pm
He selected the wrong back. Irving was the value and proved he's the real deal.
Packers0808
August 19, 2025 at 07:40 am
Yes I know the big money difference but isn't the reason Packers got rid of Alexander, unavailability? Just saying!
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2025 at 01:43 pm
Yes it was, my view too. Alexander the Occasional stated he would have stayed with the Packers if Gutey would have offered him Ravens money...$6 M INCLUDING incentives. Gutey probably told him "you should probably take that deal, Ja."
barutanseijin
August 19, 2025 at 08:17 am
The contract argument for Lloyd is unconvincing. He hasn’t shown exceptional strength, power, speed, wiggle or balance. These are qualities you either have or don’t have; they’re not developed. Whatever he did in college, in the NFL, he’s eminently replaceable and replacement level RBs are cheap.
GregC
August 19, 2025 at 08:21 am
He showed all of those qualities in college. That's why he was drafted in the third round, which is right where he was expected to be drafted. And only three other RBs were drafted before him.
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 08:27 am
It’s only last week that the media present were salivating at what they saw of him running in practice. Im not always going to believe them, but when its all of them and their usual cynicism after many camps is dissolved by one player in unison, it leads me to think the “no talent” claims are extremely dubious.
barutanseijin
August 19, 2025 at 08:45 am
He’s not in college anymore. He needs to prove he can cut it in the pros. He hasn’t. NEXT!
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 08:20 am
Lloyd had a more refined upbringing with a doting mother who worried about injuries, Catholic school, etc. than someone like scrappy Josh Jacobs, one of 5, who spent time living in cars, shelters, never slept in a bed until college. Marshawn Lynch grew up in a rough part of Oakland. Something to think about.
GregC
August 19, 2025 at 08:25 am
So he's having all of these injuries because he had a doting mother? What did she do to his hamstring? And his hip? And his appendix?
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 08:27 am
There is a good chance Jacobs and Lynch play(ed) through injuries. Recovery from a laparoscopic appendectomy is
4-6 weeks. He could have returned before the end of the season. Surgery was Nov 15, 2024, Last game was Jan 15, '25
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 08:36 am
I hope not through a hamstring. For one they’d be largely useless and for another their appearance would likely be brief before they were prone and incapable. There a reason people used to hamstring enemies. It’s more feasible to play through a bone break than a hamstring.
I can only deduce that you’ve never really played a physical sport from this and prior comments on injuries.
dblbogey
August 19, 2025 at 11:29 am
WTF?
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2025 at 08:21 am
"And now the Packers and Lloyd are in a weird position. Do the Packers rush Lloyd back quickly in an effort to capitalize on his athleticism, while risking another injury?"
You'd think Cory just parachuted onto Lambeau Field and looking around in awe and wonder saying "who are these guys?"
A weird position? Good grief, they are in this position every single year. When it comes to Packer injuries, the only "rushing" done for an injured player is into the training room, weeks of careful rehab, and the patience of Job before they even contemplate a snap.
T7Steve
August 19, 2025 at 08:31 am
Like Watson, he's a guy you have to keep your fingers crossed for every time he's on the field. If they can't prove themselves in the first four years, the NFL weeds them out, unfortunately.
nagawicka
August 20, 2025 at 09:17 am
So, Lloyd's got 3 (THREE) more years then, before fans can go whingeing & screeching about how he's unavailable and no-good and his career's over and he's injury prone and a wasted pick and never never ever was a worthy draft pick, GUTE. Like, he's got 3 more years, per you, before fans can jump down his throat too early. It's the NFL, and they never have to admit that fact.
Pop quiz: HOW MANY hamstrings are Packers players dealing with? Are 'analysts' and fans treating 'em all pretty much the same?
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 08:40 am
He looks like Watson 2.0-nice person but too injury-prone.
crayzpackfan
August 19, 2025 at 08:50 am
With him being injured and out all the time, we don't even know if he has fixed his fumbling issues (I say jokingly).
Since'61
August 19, 2025 at 09:05 am
Give Lloyd the chance to get healthy. No need to rush him back. It's disappointing that he is injured again but an early return is likely to result in yet another injury. Do it correctly and let's get him to the point where he can contribute this season. GPG! Thanks, Since '61
HarryHodag
August 19, 2025 at 09:13 am
Sorry, can't back keeping Lloyd. The reason is there's an abundance of talent at the position. Lloyd, when not injured, showed flashes but you simply can't base your performance on guys who aren't on the field.(Note to Christian Watson fans). Josh Jacobs took an incredible pounding last season and barely missed a snap.
Lloyd gets tackled last weekend on a routine play and comes up gimpy again.
The old ball coach once said sentimentality will get you beaten. Sorry, but the Packers should find another running back.
BuckyBadger
August 19, 2025 at 09:19 am
You are not going to cut a 3rd round pick already. No reason to. Put him on the PUP and hopefully he can make it back. Wouldn't be the 1st player to have injury issues to start his career only to go on and have a nice career.
HarryHodag
August 19, 2025 at 09:29 am
Why not cut him? It's a waste of a roster spot and money for a player who simply cannot stay healthy.
Don't let "the draft" position be a main factor in determining performance. Play on the field is the only measure that matters and Lloyd has(and likely will) come up short.
nagawicka
August 20, 2025 at 09:19 am
Why cut him? There's no upside. Cutting him is all downside. We made the investment, no back can offer what he can, and if he does go down we've got running backs to step in. We've got the roster spot, the money, the role for Lloyd. Wasting all that investment before you've seen the goods & been paid on the field in Lllyd's play is stupefyingly negligent.
Mister Chievous
August 19, 2025 at 12:58 pm
an abundance of talent? lol. same thing everyone said about our wide receivers last year until half way through the season. everyone except me.
BuckyBadger
August 19, 2025 at 09:21 am
Patience is all anyone can do about the situation. He will probably be on the PUP to start the year and hopefully he can over come the early set backs. He isn't going to get cut this year so you can forget that idea.
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 10:45 am
He will not be on the PuP because he has practiced. We could put him on IR. Do that now and he can’t play for us this year. Alternatively we have 2 spots to nominate a player for in season IR at cut downs now that protect them from waiver. We could use one on him.
However, we’ve no idea how long he’s projected to be out. If it’s 3 weeks they may just roster him. If it’s longer there’s no guarantee we don’t decide 2 other hurt players are not more essential to protect for return. As had been pointed out, our RBs last year were a strength and all return plus Amar Johnson might actually be a good fit for what Lloyd was going to do if they decide they want that outside the tackles option enough.
We don’t even actually know if Lloyd was a lock to get serious snaps or simply that the team was trying to see if they trusted him to protect and not fumble as well as general performance. That’s what camp is often used for when alternatives are known. Sadly, if so, those questions remain unanswered and, even if healthy his role might be very limited as a result.
We are going to need to be patient. They will probably do nothing till cut down time to ensure they know the whole picture before deciding how to handle the injured still on the 90 best for the team as they see it.
Leatherhead
August 19, 2025 at 10:38 am
I took a lot of downvotes when I questioned why Lloyd was leapfrogging over Wilson and Brooks. The optimism that Lloyd might stay healthy throughout training camp was never based on anything, IMO, except best wishes. And now he's injured again.
The 53 man roster is less than a week away. We still have Jacobs, Wilson, and Brooks, and we've added Abanikanda and Johnson to the mix. Lloyd is not eligible for PUP. We either have to put him on IR, put him on the 53, or release him.
It's hard to release a Day 2 pick his second year. The higher percentage move is to put him on IR. We still have his contract for two more years after this. Wilson will be gone next year and a healthy Lloyd might have a shot at moving ahead of Johnson and Abanikanda and sticking on the 53 . As for this season, I don't think he figures into the mix.
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2025 at 11:24 am
Thinking about how Lloyd could positively impact the Packers this year is akin to doing the same thinking with Micah Parsons. One can't be counted on to actually play much, if at all, the other would wreck your cap and mess up the roster.
Block them both out and move on...especially when two of the most talented rooms on the Packers are at RB and LB.
7 or 8 injuries now for Lloyd in one year (half of them soft tissue damage)...each one causing significant loss of training and practice time...is more than just bad luck. Some Packers are just injury prone. Watson is...so is Musgrave...Doubs might be...Alexander was the poster boy and I do believe it was the reason Gutey only timidly tried to keep him as a Packer.
Lloyd won't be cut given his rookie deal...but take him off the depth chart already. And take a long look at Johnson and Abanikanda. One of those should be on the 53 and the other hopefully makes it to the PS.
Major Snafu
August 19, 2025 at 02:33 pm
Not if your convinced he should have been a day four pick instead
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 10:40 am
Packers won't cut him but they should not rely on him. He'll likely play 5-6 games at this rate.
There are enough players we are 'having patience with' such as LVN, Q Walker, Musgrave, Wyatt, Watson, and so on. The Packers don't cut their losses early enough. (Welp--they are all early-rounders who have required 'patience' for 3-4+ years)
These types of players drain energy from the team. Either it is their inconsistency, unavailability, frequent injuries.
I see NFL football like the military-team members need to trust each other to show up and play hard.
I've played competitive team sports for in high school and college; swim relay teams, center forward in hockey.
Best players have that 'dog' mentality-like Kraft & Jacobs-neither of them are always nursing injuries.
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 10:48 am
There little to gain by cutting him as he’s on a rookie contract. They won’t. They may decide to shut him down for the year at most.
Leatherhead
August 19, 2025 at 10:55 am
I’m not sure what’. “Shut him down”. means.
We can put him on the 53, or put him on IR, or cut him. Is there another option?
Coldworld
August 19, 2025 at 03:29 pm
Shutting him down for me would be putting him on IR now without using one of the 2 cut down day destinations to return (at team discretion). Like Glover, he would remain a Packer but not be able to be activated this season.
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 11:18 am
Both Watson and Lloyd are non-contact type athletes-they are more like gymnasts-they can do back-flips on demand.
Leatherhead
August 19, 2025 at 11:39 am
That would be easier to believe if I hadn’t seen Watson make hundreds of solid blocks. Non-contact my ass.
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 12:28 pm
@LH-non-contact might not be the correct word but he is very injury prone-that better?
Talk to me with respect-I'm sick of your nasty attitude.
Leatherhead
August 19, 2025 at 01:11 pm
I’m sick of your stupidity
13TimeChamps
August 19, 2025 at 11:58 am
Do you ever get tired of making ridiculous comments? First, it's Lloyd's doting mother that is the cause of his injuries. Now Watson, one of the best blocking receivers on the team is a non-contact type athlete.
What are your thoughts on Jewish space lasers?
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 12:31 pm
@13-EC-Many of you are surface evaluators. There is something to be said about the toughness of an upbringing that prepares a man for a gladiator sport.
I would invite you and many of the other apologists on this site to face reality once in awhile.
Watson is not built for football nor is Lloyd
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2025 at 12:07 pm
Watson has been playing "contact football" as a kid, in High School, in College and for the last 3 years in the NFL. He never had an injury history before.
Who knows why he's suddenly been injury prone as Packer...but it certainly was not due to being a "non contact type athlete". He's a "play hard, hit hard, hair on fire" type athlete.
Snap the ball
August 19, 2025 at 12:20 pm
You forgot. He BLOCKS.
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2025 at 01:55 pm
I did not...I said he hits.
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 12:32 pm
@LP-Perhaps he played in high school but he is clearly not durable at the NFL level-nor is Lloyd.
I would ask why Kraft and Jacobs can hack it.
Bitternotsour
August 19, 2025 at 04:19 pm
You mental pip-squeak - you realize Watson's dad played in the NFL for 4 years, despite your attempts to slander his upbringing and physicality he was literally born to play in the NFL. He has a bloodline.
maybe for a day or two just stop posting stupid shit.
Snap the ball
August 19, 2025 at 12:19 pm
Watson is the reason why we win the games we do with him. They double or triple cover him. Others are open. Wide open.
I can only image if he was playing with Rogers in his prime.
Snap the ball
August 19, 2025 at 11:01 pm
Ok I guess I’m wrong. Not
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2025 at 11:52 am
Lloyd is just another blow to the questionable offense. All banged up, so many preferred starters unable to practice the playbook and with each other.
This is a serious issue for the play date with the lions. So is the weak OL depth of poorly developed, undisciplined players. I cannot stand the lions...but they are a physical, nasty bunch...especially on Defense. They get chewed out if they "thud tackle" vs getting hollered at for not doing it.
I can't even contemplate the Packers losing two starters off the OL. Campbell can and does: "OK men. you better be tackling and blocking and hitting with 100% aggression against these guys. If you don't, you're getting benched! Sound Good?!?"
I feel confident about the Packer D. The O has me questioning so much. I need to shake this feeling I had last year...a few games before the playoffs...that they are backing into this season the way they did the playoffs.
Major Snafu
August 19, 2025 at 02:32 pm
May be the year Gutts bad picks come out and show us just how many targets he missed. Lloyd is a bust until he isnt but how long can you afford someone taking up room that is unproductive Gutt?
nagawicka
August 20, 2025 at 09:39 am
Welcome to the NFL. Orientation is THAT way ---->
Snap the ball
August 19, 2025 at 12:13 pm
Google Grudens NFC preview. Very good. Breaks down each team. It’s a longer video. Good to watch and expected changes for each team.
Snap the ball
August 19, 2025 at 11:03 pm
Thumbs down. Interesting. Maybe a . Lions fan. Vikings fan. Bears fan
I would say Gruden knows his stuff.
Snap the ball
August 19, 2025 at 12:13 pm
NFC north preview
Snap the ball
August 19, 2025 at 12:17 pm
This team should be in Santa Carla in February. Winning….
Other team backs are back for a reason. Back ups. On the O line.
If it gets that bad maybe Kenny Clark at guard or Karl Brooks.
Bo can do it so can Kenny
Mister Chievous
August 19, 2025 at 12:34 pm
no one has said anything about giving up on Lloyd. stop making things up to add drama to an otherwise worthless recap of his injury history. we all know it ad nauseum. running out of stuff to write about?
NFLfan
August 19, 2025 at 12:36 pm
Campbell would not be employing 'patience' with an oft-injured player. Nor would he be waiting 3-4 years for an early rounder to live up to his draft-status-this is on Gute and poor drafting.
Major Snafu
August 19, 2025 at 02:28 pm
I lack patience. I gave up in Stokes and Alexander about year three. Nothing burgers who were oft injured. I'm giving up on Lloyd now. Three or four injuries, mostly in non contact stuff and he has produced nothing and worse, doesnt look like he is ready to produce. Thus, we paid him a year and a half to bench sit and he shows zero promiss of production. Way too many backs out there on other teams, practice squads to waste on this guy. Throw Watson in that group also, never produced anything when he played.
Thats the problem, its not the injuries for Watson its, what has he done as a player and it aint much.
I have no given up on LVN. Reason, I think he was poorly coached and handled year one and if screwed up his mind. I always thought that once he gets the right coaching and has a chance to prove his worth he will or he will be the bust some suspect. This is his year to shine or else.
joejetson
August 19, 2025 at 08:41 pm
Lloyd is listed at 5'9", 220#.
That is not a physique that seems fragile, or not built to take a hit. I think it's just a case of terrible luck.
Everyone in the NFL gets banged up sooner or later. It's the nature of the sport. Really big, really strong, really fast guys beating the crap out of each other for three and a half hours every week. It amazes me that there aren't even more injuries than what we see now.
What bothers me are the non-contact injuries. There's got to be a way for these guys to minimize those. More stretching? I don't know. But seeing Watson, and now Lloyd go down without being hit, it is frustrating.
You could see Lloyd's talent on the play he got hurt. It was a simple wheel route where the linebacker had him covered to the outside. But #32 showed a burst and beat him to the sideline where the defender didn't even get a push on him to get out of bounds. He was thirty yards downfield and almost outran the next guy before he went down awkwardly with the hamstring injury.
That run was something neither Jacobs nor any of the other RB's could do. I'd definitely find a way to keep the door open for the kid to come back and play this year. He, like Watson, has a special talent.
They just need a way to keep them healthy.
People who just throw up their hands and declare, "cut Lloyd" and "cut Watson" are nuts. You don't cut two of your best players because they had some bad luck injuries. You try to solve the problem, get them back out there, and have a plan to reduce the likelihood of re-injury.
barutanseijin
August 19, 2025 at 10:50 pm
Wilson had a wheel route reception that went for 32yds AND he got through the game without major injury. Advantage Wilson.
The idea that a running back who has spent most of his time on with the Packers on the sidelines and who has contributed next to nothing is one of the Packers’ best players is risible.
Snap the ball
August 19, 2025 at 11:04 pm
Amar Johnson