Where Does Javon Bullard Fit in the Packers Defense?
By GilMartin

The Green Bay Packers selected Javon Bullard in the second round of the 2024 NFL Draft. The Georgia alum started 11 games as a rookie and played in 15. He missed a couple of games late in the season due to an ankle injury.
Bullard was productive, making 90 total tackles and recovering a fumble. But with the addition of Nate Hobbs, where does Bullard fit into the Packers defense in 2025? As of now, the answer is not so clear cut.
Bullard has the versatility the Packers prefer in the defensive backs. He played both safety and in the slot as a rookie. Most scouts felt he played better in the slot.
Pro Football Focus graded Bullard as a strong run defender but a below average player in coverage. According to pro-football-reference.com, Bullard struggled badly in coverage as a rookie. Opposing quarterbacks completed 85.2 percent of their passes when throwing to receivers covered by Bullard and had a quarterback rating of 120.6. Hopefully, Bullard will improve in coverage in his second season in the NFL.
But the big question surrounding Bullard is where will he play in 2025? The Packers didn’t select Bullard in the second round to have him sit on the bench. They have expectations that he will be a solid contributor to the defense which he already was during his rookie year. But there will be tight competition for playing time in the secondary this season.
If Jaire Alexander returns to Green Bay, he will almost certainly be one of the starting boundary corners assuming he can stay healthy. Keisean Nixon, Carrington Valentine, and Hobbs would battle for the other boundary corner spot.
If the Packers move on from Alexander, Nixon, Valentine and Hobbs would be competing for two starting spots. There is also the possibility the Packers add a cornerback in this year’s draft class, and he would be competing for playing time as well.
Nixon, Hobbs and Bullard also have experience playing in the slot. In fact, that’s the position Hobbs played most frequently with the Raiders although GM Brian Gutekunst indicated he believes Hobbs can play both the slot and on the boundary. Thus far, the slot has been Bullard’s best position. He appears to have more competition for that job now.
The Packers could also have Bullard compete for a spot at safety. Xavier McKinney had a Pro Bowl campaign in 2024 and will certainly be one of the starters. The other starting spot was manned by rookie Evan Williams who performed better than Bullard as the other safety last season. In fact, Williams earned All-Rookie honors.
Defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley has been high on Bullard even with his struggles in coverage. In fact, midseason, Hafley indicated that Bullard’s strong play near the line of scrimmage helped McKinney make big plays in the secondary. He definitely liked what Bullard brought to the defense.
“I think when you watch Bull, you watch how physical he is around the ball and you just want to try to find ways to get him more involved play after play,” Hafley said midway through Bullard’s rookie year. “We’re playing a team that we felt was going to try to run the football a lot [the Rams], and what better way to get a good physical defender in the ‘11’ personnel grouping?
“So, rather than have a guy who’s just going to be in there for coverage reasons, you kind of get the best of both worlds. You’re almost playing with three safeties. He can do it all, though. I think he can cover. I know he’s physical in the run game. He’s a really good blitzer.”
Most NFL coaches consider competition a good thing. The expression head coach Matt LaFleur likes to use is “iron sharpens iron.” Bullard will now face competition for playing time in his second year with the team. He could earn one of the starting jobs at safety or in the slot. Or he could be a rotational piece in nickel packages that could help improve the run defense when the team lines up with smaller, quicker, personnel.
Either way, Bullard faces a challenge in year two. We’ll see what role he carves out in 2025, his second season in the NFL.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers
__________________________




Comments (47)
Coldworld
April 10, 2025 at 09:57 am
Bullard is an asset as a tackler. I suspect he will continue to be a situational piece in the slot while further developing as a safety. What we have added appears to be more options to handle slot duties in more obvious passing situations.
LLCHESTY
April 10, 2025 at 02:47 pm
It would be kind of strange to have two CBs that have mostly played slot end up being the starters outside and Gutey talked up Hobbs' versatility after they signed him. If Alexander is gone they need at least two more CBs to fill out the roster but I think they can be day 3 picks. I think Valentine has a decent shot at ending up a starter and that really opens up a ton of options.
I think they NFL will be transitioning to treating DBs like colleges mainly play today. Unless it's a Major college program if you can play outside you're left out there and everyone else is inside in three safety looks. If you look at where inside guys played they usually start out playing deep, then play slot and then in the box. That outliers from that are kids that come into college with more developed frames but otherwise it makes sense to get players closer to the LOS as they gain weight and strength. With so many safeties playing slot in college it makes sense for the NFL to adapt to that model.
Leatherhead
April 10, 2025 at 11:15 am
This is a good defensive piece, He was third in defensive snaps behind McKinney and Nixon. He was third in tackles. He's our defacto slot guy....Williams comes in at S and Bullard moves to the slot.
Our starting nickel group should be McKinney, Williams, Bullard, Nixon, and Hobbs. We've put worse groups on the field.
dobber
April 10, 2025 at 12:37 pm
When the S position was weaker (before 2024) they used Nixon in the slot and played two outside CB. Last year--as you note--there was clearly more strength at S, so the S played that nickel spot. The DB group is pretty good and has some depth for the first time in awhile.
LLCHESTY
April 10, 2025 at 02:32 pm
Counting out Valentine is foolish. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he gets more snaps outside than Nixon. Nixon struggles with his back to the QB on the outside and opposing teams will know it by September. Teams are going to test him deep and if he doesn't learn to get his head around he's going to give up long completions and rack up penalties.
jannesbjornson
April 10, 2025 at 04:53 pm
He will have to show he has some sting in his bite. Dallas Goedert made him look like a fool, dragging him 20 plus yards to a TD in the Playoff Game. I have Two CBs added in this draft. One with a higher selection.
dobber
April 11, 2025 at 09:24 am
Goedert is going to drag a lot of solo-tackling CB around...he got Valentine on the end of a stiff-arm and there wasn't much he could do but hang on.
jannesbjornson
April 12, 2025 at 11:16 am
Take his legs out. Not complicated.
SicSemperTyrannis
April 13, 2025 at 07:26 pm
Show me.
GregC
April 10, 2025 at 11:35 am
This is an interesting question. The Hobbs signing puts the squeeze on Bullard a little, although it mostly puts the squeeze on Valentine--probably bumping Valentine out of the starting lineup and relegating him to dime back duties.
If they use a high draft pick on a CB, which many people think they should, Bullard may end up spending most of his time on the bench. That's why I don't think they need to spend a high pick on a CB. They just need to get a couple of developmental players to fill out the CB room, whether it's late in the draft or via the UDFA route or the waiver wire. Ordinary guys to replace Stokes and Ballentine, but with more upside.
And I'm saying this even though I think Jaire Alexander is done in Green Bay. I'm fine with that. They don't need him.
dobber
April 11, 2025 at 09:26 am
This leads us to question the motivation of "Why Hobbs" and not a more traditional outside CB in FA?
Could be because they liked how Nixon transitioned to perimeter CB and they saw a lot of the same in Hobbs.
Could be they felt the slot wasn't adequately handled by Bullard and they're hedging their bets with inside-outside guys.
We'll see.
SicSemperTyrannis
April 13, 2025 at 07:28 pm
Ordinary guys can't replace Stokes or Ballentine
Lphill
April 10, 2025 at 11:40 am
so what did the Packers see on his college tape to make him a second round pick ?
GregC
April 10, 2025 at 11:49 am
This is not a case of the Packers drafting a player earlier than expected, if that's what you're getting at. Bullard was generally considered to be the second best safety in the draft, after Tyler Nubin, and a good bet to be selected in the second round. There's no shame in him being the primary nickel back on the #6 defense in the NFL, as a rookie.
HawkPacker
April 10, 2025 at 11:58 am
Yes, but they got Williams starting at Safety and he was a 4th round pick.
I understand it takes different amounts of time for each draftee have the light bulb go off but it seems surprising that we got a 4th rounder starting over a 2nd rounder.
I was excited to see them get Bullard in the second round based on what everyone said before the draft. I guess I just expected more from him and yes I know he was injured but....
I am not excited about him not being a coverage guy in the slot. I think, based on where he was drafted, he should be better than that.
dobber
April 10, 2025 at 12:16 pm
"I understand it takes different amounts of time for each draftee have the light bulb go off but it seems surprising that we got a 4th rounder starting over a 2nd rounder."
There are two guys here worthy of play time at similar positions who came out of the same draft. Let it be that.
Litigating draft position is frustrating.
LLCHESTY
April 10, 2025 at 05:48 pm
The best thing a team can do is forget where a player came from as soon as they are on the team, doesn't matter if it's a draft pick, FA, SFA or UDFA. Draftocracy is not a good thing. Unfortunately it's much harder for fans to forget than most teams.
GregC
April 10, 2025 at 12:20 pm
I don't think it was a case of Bullard faltering so much as it was a case of Evan Williams playing so well that they couldn't keep him off the field. And it's not like Bullard was a bench warmer. As LH noted above, Bullard played the third most snaps on defense last year. I do share some of your concern that Bullard was exposed in coverage at times. That seemed to happen more toward the end of the season, and I'm hoping it happened mostly because he was playing on a bum ankle.
Leatherhead
April 10, 2025 at 12:48 pm
Where did you get the idea that Williams was starting in place of Bullard?
Bullard started 11 games, Williams 6. Bullard had more snaps. Bullard had more tackles.
He's not just a 'coverage guy in the slot' He's a tackler in the slot, and he makes a lot of them.
Coldworld
April 10, 2025 at 01:22 pm
Williams was injured. He won the second safety spot prior to that. It was pretty clear that Bullard was practicing almost exclusively at the slot at that point. The real wrinkle is that that might well have been the initial intent and Williams just freed them up to do it. Later, Anderson and Oladapo were used deep over Bullard (successfully too), which just lends weight to where they saw Bullard contributing.
The one issue was the fact that with Nixon outside, there was no obvious more cover capable DB option for the slot they felt comfortable with. That meant Bullard probably being put in situations they would rather not have had him in. Now, that seems to have been resolved through targeted FA. Again that speaks volumes.
Coldworld
April 10, 2025 at 01:14 pm
Williams outplayed almost anyone’s expectations. Good. Those are the holy grail draft picks one hopes for, not a reason for questioning other picks.
Tom, Walker, Williams are wins not examples of players picked where they were on actual merit but due to their merit being underestimated generally.
SicSemperTyrannis
April 13, 2025 at 07:30 pm
If he makes the team, that's plenty to be excited about. Depth matters!
dobber
April 10, 2025 at 12:19 pm
Absolutely spot on. We could argue over who the top couple safeties in last year's draft were, but in virtually every discussion Bullard was one of them. Most around here were pretty happy with that selection at the time...maybe it's more a salute to scouting that a S drafted later developed faster.
More people were wondering why the Packers were fishing on Williams in the 4th than they were wondering why they invested a 2 in Bullard.
SicSemperTyrannis
April 13, 2025 at 07:35 pm
Two great players! I'm very glad they're Packers. Both suffered injury, which is not surprising. We need more just like them ...
jannesbjornson
April 10, 2025 at 05:01 pm
Wrong guy for the job. Kam Kinchens , or Bullock were the real deal safeties. Bullard is a liability in coverage, which is part of a saftey's job description.
He comes up to the scrum and gets his nose in there to tackle, but that is expected after Owens, Savage and Ford
played the stay away game, protecting their bones for impending free agency.
T7Steve
April 10, 2025 at 11:58 am
This is a nice problem to have. Starters fighting for starting spots and starters for backups that won't leave a gapping whole when the frequent injuries happen.
beerandbrats
April 10, 2025 at 12:09 pm
With an opposing QB rating of 120, Bullard's value is the same as McDuffie. They're good for our run defense but both are a liability in coverage.
GregC
April 10, 2025 at 12:32 pm
With McDuffie, it's been a pattern for his entire career, and it limits him as a player. With Bullard, he was a rookie and was playing hurt toward the end of the season, so let's see how he does in his second year. I wonder if this Hafley defense puts a lot of stress on players who have to defend the shallow middle part of the field. I recall reading something about that when Hafley was hired last year, i.e. that the linebackers may have a hard time in pass coverage. It's the price that is paid for the defense being strong in other areas.
beerandbrats
April 10, 2025 at 12:43 pm
I expect our LBs to struggle in coverage because their primary responsibility is defending the run.
A DB who can not cover is an entirely different problem...
Coldworld
April 10, 2025 at 01:24 pm
So you hated Nick Collins for 3 years? Many safeties take a while to learn coverage. Not very many tackle as well as Bullard. I don’t know how much Bullard will improve in coverage, but he is likely to improve.
I also didn’t see another slot option if Nixon was outside. That suggests that, even as he is, he fulfilled a valuable role. Indeed that lack of options may well have forced him into situations that weren’t ideal at this point, which I see the acquisition of Hobbs as a possibly confirming. Coming in, Bullard excelled playing man. So playing in a zone based scheme may also have been a factor in his struggles as a rookie.
beerandbrats
April 10, 2025 at 01:45 pm
I have to agree CW. It seems some guys play very well in zone coverage but cannot play man to man, and vice versa. This has to make drafting and planning the defense very challenging. I am not down on Bullard. I favor the DBs with man-to-man coverage skills. Bullard is young and I expect he will only get better.
jannesbjornson
April 10, 2025 at 05:07 pm
No Comparison.
Leatherhead
April 10, 2025 at 07:16 pm
Safety....the guys who are supposed to keep plays from being long TDs.
In the opener, Philly had the long one of 60+ yards.
The next longest TD was a 39 yard play. Then two more of 30 or more yards.
That's four plays out of over 1000 where an opponent got a long TD on us.
Leatherhead
April 10, 2025 at 02:28 pm
So, with so many guys that were liabilities,and our best CB out injured, and with inadequate pressure.....how did we manage to have one of the better pass defenses in the NFL last year? We were 6th in adjusted yards/attempt!! How is that accomplished with so many weak links on defense?
LLCHESTY
April 10, 2025 at 02:40 pm
If he has that same QB rating against this year I'd agree, but he won't. His two worst games were when he had to play safety after practicing at nickel all week. He was having to think too much and that causes hesitation. Hopefully that's not a problem this year.
dobber
April 10, 2025 at 12:25 pm
DBs in general are a perishable commodity. They get hurt...Williams played a physical brand of football last season that seems to expose him to injury.
A front line signing plus two draftees who belong (Bullard and Williams) plus a third (Oladapo) who was getting snaps later in the season = a S room that's in good hands. But none of the four are the same kind of player.
T7Steve
April 10, 2025 at 02:13 pm
Did you get a thumb because you just made a nice comment that wasn't controversial? It doesn't matter but I'd just like to know what you said that was controversial.
LLCHESTY
April 10, 2025 at 05:54 pm
If you don't get a couple thumbs down every comment are you even commenting?? If I had a dollar for every time Stocky gave me the 👎 I'd have enough for a couple pizzas and a 12 pack of good microbrew!
LLCHESTY
April 10, 2025 at 11:54 pm
I knew Stocky would come through! 🤣
dobber
April 11, 2025 at 09:29 am
I don't pay any attention to the thumbs anymore, and I don't care if they downvote and don't reply. People got a right to vote and not comment. Thumbers gonna thumb.
LLCHESTY
April 10, 2025 at 02:43 pm
I wouldn't mind seeing them draft a safety who is good at playing deep. I don't think that's a strong suit of Williams or Bullard and you can find safeties that mainly played deep later in the draft. Bonus if they have return ability.
LLCHESTY
April 10, 2025 at 02:29 pm
Hafley put a lot on his plate and he struggled but that could pay dividends this year. If you listened to Hafley's weekly press conferences you'll know that they had to play Bullard a couple times at safety when he had practiced at nickel all week. If he puts in the time in the film room and comes in with a solid grasp on what his responsibilities are at all three spots he should be the chess piece Hafley is looking for, if not he'll probably struggle again.
Lphill
April 10, 2025 at 03:46 pm
What DB on the Packers can cover Jefferson, St Brown, M Neighbors or any other elite receiver? If you think Nixon you are crazy .
Coldworld
April 10, 2025 at 11:45 pm
Alexander. That’s why we should keep him. To be fair, not many cornerbacks in the league can really cover those guys consistently one-on-one with the rules the way they are.
dobber
April 11, 2025 at 09:29 am
That's the definition of elite and elite usage.
Lphill
April 11, 2025 at 11:28 am
I agree this is why we need Alexander.
SicSemperTyrannis
April 13, 2025 at 07:46 pm
His cost against the cap is less than $7MM this year. I don't see how Gutey gets a better value elsewhere.
I have seen conflicting information about how keeping Ja this season does and does not affect his cap hit next year, even if he's not a Packer in '26. If it's actually a $17MM difference against the cap in '26, that's certainly a factor to consider ...